Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 96:314-318 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preston, C.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Preston, C.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, S. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Preston, C.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, S. B.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Resistance to the Herbicide Paraquat and Increased Tolerance to Photoinhibition Are Not Correlated in Several Weed Species 1

Christopher Preston, Joseph A. M. Holtum and Stephen B. Powles

Department of Crop Protection, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond South Australia 5064, Australia

Photoinhibition was examined in paraquat-resistant and paraquat-susceptible biotypes of Hordeum glaucum Steud., Hordeum leporinum Link., Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns., and Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronq. Plants were photoinhibited at low temperature, and the extent of photoinhibition determined by O2 evolution and 77 K fluorescence. No difference in the degree of photoinhibition was detected between paraquat-resistant and paraquat-susceptible biotypes for any of the species examined. C. bonariensis plants were also photoinhibited by treatment without CO2 at either 21% (volume/volume) O2 or 4% (volume/volume) O2, and again no difference was observed between the paraquat-resistant and paraquat-susceptible biotypes in reduction of the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence. This is in contrast to a recent report (MAK Jansen, Y Shaaltiel, D Kazzes, O Canaani, S Malkin, J Gressel, [1989] Plant Physiol 91: 1174-1178 in which it was claimed that a paraquat-resistant biotype of C. bonariensis was more tolerant of photoinhibition than a paraquat-susceptible biotype. We conclude that paraquat-resistant biotypes of these plant species are not more tolerant of photoinhibition when compared with the paraquat-susceptible biotypes.


1 This work was partially supported by an Australian Research Council Postdoctoral Fellowship (to C.P.).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Plant Biologists