This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (70) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pammenter, N. W. Articles by Berjak, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pammenter, N. W. Articles by Berjak, P. Agricola Articles by Pammenter, N. W. Articles by Berjak, P.

Environmental and Stress Physiology

Homeohydrous (Recalcitrant) Seeds: Dehydration, the State of Water and Viability Characteristics in Landolphia kirkii

Plant Cell Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Natal, Durban, 4001 South Africa, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Seed Storage Laboratory, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

Differential scanning calorimetry was used to study the relationships among drying rate, desiccation sensitivity, and the properties of water in homeohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds of Landolphia kirkii. Slow drying of intact seeds to axis moisture contents of approximately 0.9 to 0.7 gram/gram caused lethal damage, whereas very rapid (flash) drying of excised embryonic axes permitted removal of water to approximately 0.3 gram/gram. The amount of nonfreezable water in embryonic axes (0.28 gram H₂O/gram dry mass) did not change with drying rate and was similar to that of desiccation-tolerant seeds. These results suggest that the amount of nonfreezable water per se is not an important factor in desiccation sensitivity. However, flash drying that removed all freezable water damaged embryonic axes. Differences between desiccation-sensitive and -tolerant seeds occur at two levels: (a) tolerant seeds naturally lose freezable water, and sensitive seeds can lose this water without obvious damage only if it is removed very rapidly; (b) tolerant seeds can withstand the loss of a substantial proportion of nonfreezable water, whereas sensitive seeds are damaged if nonfreezable water is removed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Berjak and N. W. Pammenter From Avicennia to Zizania: Seed Recalcitrance in Perspective Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(2): 213 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Liang and W. Q. Sun Desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant Theobroma cacao embryonic axes: the optimal drying rate and its physiological basis J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2000; 51(352): 1911 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Q. Sun Dielectric Relaxation of Water and Water-Plasticized Biomolecules in Relation to Cellular Water Organization, Cytoplasmic Viscosity, and Desiccation Tolerance in Recalcitrant Seed Tissues Plant Physiology, November 1, 2000; 124(3): 1203 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Sacande, J. Buitink, and F. A. Hoekstra A study of water relations in neem (Azadirachta indica) seed that is characterized by complex storage behaviour J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2000; 51(344): 635 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Liang and W. Q. Sun Rate of Dehydration and Cumulative Desiccation Stress Interacted to Modulate Desiccation Tolerance of Recalcitrant Cocoa and Ginkgo Embryonic Tissues Plant Physiology, April 1, 2002; 128(4): 1323 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]