This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (57) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sarquis, J. I. Articles by Morgan, P. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sarquis, J. I. Articles by Morgan, P. W. Agricola Articles by Sarquis, J. I. Articles by Morgan, P. W.

Environmental and Stress Physiology

Ethylene Evolution from Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedling Roots and Shoots in Response to Mechanical Impedance

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77840

The effect of mechanical impedance on ethylene evolution and growth of preemergent maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings was investigated by pressurizing the growth medium in triaxial cells in a controlled environment. Pressure increased the bulk density of the medium and thus the resistance to growth. The elongation of maize primary roots and preemergent shoots was severely hindered by applied pressures as low as 10 kilopascals. Following a steep decline in elongation at low pressures, both shoots and roots responded to additional pressure in a linear manner, but shoots were more severely affected than roots at higher pressures. Radial expansion was promoted in both organs by mechanical impedance. Primary roots typically became thinner during the experimental period when grown unimpeded. In contrast, pressures as low as 25 kilopascals caused a 25% increase in root tip diameter. Shoots showed a slight enhancement of radial expansion; however, in contrast to roots, the shoots increased in diameter even when growing unimpeded. Such morphological changes were not evident until at least 3 hours after initiation of treatment. All levels of applied pressure promoted ethylene evolution as early as 1 hour after application of pressure. After 1 hour, ethylene evolution rates had increased 10, 32, 70, and 255% at 25, 50, 75, and 100 kilopascals respectively, and continued to increase linearly for at least 10 hours. When intact corn seedlings were subjected to a series of hourly cycles of pressure, followed by relaxation, ethylene production rates increased or decreased rapidly, illustrating tight coupling between mechanical impedance and tissue response. Seedlings exposed to 1 microliter of ethylene per liter showed symptoms similar to those shown by plants grown under mechanical impedance. Root diameter increased 5 times as much as the shoot diameter. Pretreatment with 10 micromolar aminoethoxyvinyl glycine plus 1 micromolar silver thiosulfate maintained ethylene production rates of impeded seedlings at basal levels and restored shoot and root extension to 84 and 90% of unimpeded values, respectively. Our results support the hypothesis that ethylene plays a pivotal role in the regulation of plant tissue response to mechanical impedance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. W. Chehab, E. Eich, and J. Braam Thigmomorphogenesis: a complex plant response to mechano-stimulation J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2009; 60(1): 43 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Okamoto, S. Tsurumi, K. Shibasaki, Y. Obana, H. Takaji, Y. Oono, and A. Rahman Genetic Dissection of Hormonal Responses in the Roots of Arabidopsis Grown under Continuous Mechanical Impedance Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1651 - 1662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-W. Chen, Y.-W. Yang, H.-S. Lur, Y.-G. Tsai, and M.-C. Chang A Novel Function of Abscisic Acid in the Regulation of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Root Growth and Development Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 1 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. HANBURY and B. J. ATWELL Growth Dynamics of Mechanically Impeded Lupin Roots: does Altered Morphology Induce Hypoxia? Ann. Bot., October 1, 2005; 96(5): 913 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Buer, G. O. Wasteneys, and J. Masle Ethylene Modulates Root-Wave Responses in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 1085 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Ma, T. I. Baskin, K. M. Brown, and J. P. Lynch Regulation of Root Elongation under Phosphorus Stress Involves Changes in Ethylene Responsiveness Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 1381 - 1390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Sharp and M. E. LeNoble ABA, ethylene and the control of shoot and root growth under water stress J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2002; 53(366): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Roberts, A. Hussain, I. B. Taylor, and C. R. Black Use of mutants to study long-distance signalling in response to compacted soil J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2002; 53(366): 45 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hussain, C. R. Black, I. B. Taylor, and J. A. Roberts Soil Compaction. A Role for Ethylene in Regulating Leaf Expansion and Shoot Growth in Tomato? Plant Physiology, December 1, 1999; 121(4): 1227 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. A. Johnson, M. L. Sistrunk, D. H. Polisensky, and J. Braam Arabidopsis thaliana Responses to Mechanical Stimulation Do Not Require ETR1 or EIN2 Plant Physiology, February 1, 1998; 116(2): 643 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]