Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 97:245-252 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burkey, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burkey, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burkey, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Response of Soybean Photosynthesis and Chloroplast Membrane Function to Canopy Development and Mutual Shading

Kent O. Burkey and Randy Wells

United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7631 1, Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7631, Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7631

The effect of natural shading on photosynthetic capacity and chloroplast thylakoid membrane function was examined in soybean (Glycine max. cv Young) under field conditions using a randomized complete block design. Seedlings were thinned to 15 plants per square meter at 20 days after planting. Leaves destined to function in the shaded regions of the canopy were tagged during early expansion at 40 days after planting. To investigate the response of shaded leaves to an increase in available light, plants were removed from certain plots at 29 or 37 days after tagging to reduce the population from 15 to three plants per square meter and alter the irradiance and spectral quality of light. During the transition from a sun to a shade environment, maximum photosynthesis and chloroplast electron transport of control leaves decreased by two- to threefold over a period of 40 days followed by rapid senescence and abscission. Senescence and abscission of tagged leaves were delayed by more than 4 weeks in plots where plant populations were reduced to three plants per square meter. Maximum photosynthesis and chloroplast electron transport activity were stabilized or elevated in response to increased light when plant populations were reduced from 15 to three plants per square meter. Several chloroplast thylakoid membrane components were affected by light environment. Cytochrome f and coupling factor protein decreased by 40% and 80%, respectively, as control leaves became shaded and then increased when shaded leaves acclimated to high light. The concentrations of photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers were not affected by light environment or leaf age in field grown plants, resulting in a constant PSII/PSI ratio of 1.6 ± 0.3. Analysis of the chlorophyll-protein composition revealed a shift in chlorophyll from PSI to PSII as leaves became shaded and a reversal of this process when shaded leaves were provided with increased light. These results were in contrast to those of soybeans grown in a growth chamber where the PSII/PSI ratio as well as cytochrome f and coupling factor protein levels were dependent on growth irradiance. To summarize, light environment regulated both the photosynthetic characteristics and the timing of senescence in soybean leaves grown under field conditions.


1 Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the United States Department of Agriculture or the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. L. PONS and Y. E. M. de JONG-VAN BERKEL
Species-specific Variation in the Importance of the Spectral Quality Gradient in Canopies as a Signal for Photosynthetic Resource Partitioning
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2004; 94(5): 725 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Wells
Leaf Pigment and Canopy Photosynthetic Response to Early Flower Removal in Cotton
Crop Sci., September 1, 2001; 41(5): 1522 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. A. Nelson and K. A. Renner
Soybean Growth and Development as Affected by Glyphosate and Postemergence Herbicide Tank Mixtures
Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 428 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. O. Burkey and J. N. Mathis
Identification of a Novel Isoform of the Chloroplast-Coupling Factor alpha -Subunit
Plant Physiology, February 1, 1998; 116(2): 703 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Plant Biologists