Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 97:515-522 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plaut, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Federman, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plaut, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Federman, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Plaut, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Federman, E.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Acclimation of CO2 Assimilation in Cotton Leaves to Water Stress and Salinity 1

Zvi Plaut and Evelyn Federman

Institute of Soils and Water, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250 Israel

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Acala SJ2) plants were exposed to three levels of osmotic or matric potentials. The first was obtained by salt and the latter by withholding irrigation water. Plants were acclimated to the two stress types by reducing the rate of stress development by a factor of 4 to 7. CO2 assimilation was then determined on acclimated and nonacclimated plants. The decrease of CO2 assimilation in salinity-exposed plants was significantly less in acclimated as compared with nonacclimated plants. Such a difference was not found under water stress at ambient CO2 partial pressure. The slopes of net CO2 assimilation versus intercellular CO2 partial pressure, for the initial linear portion of this relationship, were increased in plants acclimated to salinity of –0.3 and –0.6 megapascal but not in nonacclimated plants. In plants acclimated to water stress, this change in slopes was not significant. Leaf osmotic potential was reduced much more in acclimated than in nonacclimated plants, resulting in turgor maintenance even at –0.9 megapascal. In nonacclimated plants, turgor pressure reached zero at approximately –0.5 megapascal. The accumulation of Cl and Na+ in the salinity-acclimated plants fully accounted for the decrease in leaf osmotic potential. The rise in concentration of organic solutes comprised only 5% of the total increase in solutes in salinity-acclimated and 10 to 20% in water-stress-acclimated plants. This acclimation was interpreted in light of the higher protein content per unit leaf area and the enhanced ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity. At saturating CO2 partial pressure, the declined inhibition in CO2 assimilation of stress-acclimated plants was found for both salinity and water stress.


1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. No. 3150-E, 1990 series.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
S. Lv, K. Zhang, Q. Gao, L. Lian, Y. Song, and J. Zhang
Overexpression of an H+-PPase Gene from Thellungiella halophila in Cotton Enhances Salt Tolerance and Improves Growth and Photosynthetic Performance
Plant Cell Physiol., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1150 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. W. Netondo, J. C. Onyango, and E. Beck
Sorghum and Salinity: I. Response of Growth, Water Relations, and Ion Accumulation to NaCl Salinity
Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
H. MEDRANO, J. M. ESCALONA, J. BOTA, J. GULIAS, and J. FLEXAS
Regulation of Photosynthesis of C3 Plants in Response to Progressive Drought: Stomatal Conductance as a Reference Parameter
Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 895 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. FLEXAS and H. MEDRANO
Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2002; 89(2): 183 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Plant Biologists