This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (33) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Childs, K. L. Articles by Morgan, P. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Childs, K. L. Articles by Morgan, P. W. Agricola Articles by Childs, K. L. Articles by Morgan, P. W.

Development and Growth Regulation

Genetic Regulation of Development in Sorghum bicolor

VI. The ma₃^R Allele Results in Abnormal Phytochrome Physiology

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

Physiological processes controlled by phytochrome were examined in three near-isogenic genotypes of Sorghum bicolor, differing at the allele of the third maturity gene locus. Seedlings of 58M (ma₃^R ma₃^R) did not show phytochrome control of anthocyanin synthesis. In contrast, seedlings of 90M (ma₃ma₃) and 100M (Ma₃Ma₃) demonstrated reduced anthocyanin synthesis after treatment with far red and reversal of the far red effect by red. De-etiolation of 48-hour-old 90M and 100M dark-grown seedlings occurred with 48 hours of continuous red. Dark-grown 58M seedlings did not de-etiolate with continuous red treatment. Treatment of seedlings with gibberellic acid or tetcyclacis, a gibberellin synthesis inhibitor, did not alter anthocyanin synthesis. Levels of chlorophyll and anthocyanin were lower in light-grown 58M seedlings than in 90M and 100M. Etiolated seedlings of all three genotypes have similar amounts of photoreversible phytochrome. Crude protein extracts from etiolated seedlings were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose. Phytochrome was visualized with Pea-25, a monoclonal antibody directed to phytochrome from etiolated peas. The samples from all three genotypes contained approximately equivalent amounts of a prominent, immunostaining band at 126 kD. However, the sample from 58M did not show a fainter, secondary band at 123 kD that was present in 90M and 100M. The identity and importance of this secondary band at 123 kD is unknown. We propose that 58M is a phytochrome-related mutant that contains normal amounts of photoreversible phytochrome and normal phytochrome protein when grown in the dark.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hanumappa, L. H. Pratt, M.-M. Cordonnier-Pratt, and G. F. Deitzer A Photoperiod-Insensitive Barley Line Contains a Light-Labile Phytochrome B Plant Physiology, March 1, 1999; 119(3): 1033 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				I.-J. Lee, K. R. Foster, and P. W. Morgan Photoperiod Control of Gibberellin Levels and Flowering in Sorghum Plant Physiology, March 1, 1998; 116(3): 1003 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. A. Finlayson, I.-J. Lee, and P. W. Morgan Phytochrome B and the Regulation of Circadian Ethylene Production in Sorghum Plant Physiology, January 1, 1998; 116(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text]