Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 97:1035-1043 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Häusler, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Häusler, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, S. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Häusler, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, S. B.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Cross-Resistance to Herbicides in Annual Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum)

IV. Correlation between Membrane Effects and Resistance to Graminicides

Rainer E. Häusler1, Joseph A. M. Holtum and Stephen B. Powles

Department of Crop Protection, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, 5064, South Australia, Australia

The herbicidally active aryloxyphenoxypropionates diclofop acid, haloxyfop acid, and fluazifop acid and the cyclohexanedione sethoxydim depolarized membranes in coleoptiles of eight biotypes of herbicide-susceptible and herbicide-resistant annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Membrane polarity was reduced from –100 millivolts to –30 to –50 millivolts. Membranes repolarized after removal of the compounds only in biotypes with resistance to the compound added. Repolarization was not observed in herbicide-susceptible L. rigidum, nor was it observed in biotypes resistant to triazine, triazole, triazinone, phenylurea, or sulfonylurea herbicides but not resistant to aryloxyphenoxypropionates and cyclohexanediones. Chlorsulfuron, a sulfonylurea herbicide, at a saturating concentration of 1 micromolar, reduced membrane polarity in all biotypes studied by only 15 millivolts. The recovery of membrane potential following the removal of chlorsulfuron was restricted to chlorsulfuron-susceptible and -resistant biotypes that did not exhibit diclofop resistance. These differences in membrane responses are correlated with resistance to dicloflop rather than with resistance to chlorsulfuron. It is suggested that the differences may reflect altered membrane properties of diclofop-resistant biotypes. Further circumstantial evidence for dissimilarity of properties of membranes from diclofop-resistant and diclofop-susceptible ryegrass is provided by observations that K+/Na+ ratios were significantly higher in coleoptiles from diclofop-resistant biotypes than in coleoptiles from susceptible plants. Intact and excised roots from susceptible biotypes were capable of acidifying the external medium, whereas roots from resistant biotypes were unable to do so. The ineluctable conclusion is that in L. rigidum the phenomena of membrane repolarization and resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides are correlated.


1 Supported in part by the Wheat Research Council of Australia and the Reserve Bank of Australia Rural Credits Development Fund.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Plant Biologists