Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 98:757-760 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amthor, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amthor, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Amthor, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A. J.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

CO2 Inhibits Respiration in Leaves of Rumex crispus L. 1

Jeffrey S. Amthor2, George W. Koch and Arnold J. Bloom

Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616, Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Curly dock (Rumex crispus L.) was grown from seed in a glasshouse at an ambient CO2 partial pressure of about 35 pascals. Apparent respiration rate (CO2 efflux in the dark) of expanded leaves was then measured at ambient CO2 partial pressure of 5 to 95 pascals. Calculated intercellular CO2 partial pressure was proportional to ambient CO2 partial pressure in these short-term experiments. The CO2 level strongly affected apparent respiration rate: a doubling of the partial pressure of CO2 typically inhibited respiration by 25 to 30%, whereas a decrease in CO2 elicited a corresponding increase in respiration. These responses were readily reversible. A flexible, sensitive regulatory interaction between CO2 (a byproduct of respiration) and some component(s) of heterotrophic metabolism is indicated.


2 Present address: The Woods Hole Research Center, P.O. Box 296, Woods Hole, MA 02543.

1 Supported in part by National Science Foundation grants BSR-8821255 and DCB-89-16637 and U.S. Department of Agriculture grant 88-37264-3857.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. M. FRANTZ, N. N. COMETTI, and B. BUGBEE
Night Temperature has a Minimal Effect on Respiration and Growth in Rapidly Growing Plants
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2004; 94(1): 155 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. A. Davey, S. Hunt, G. J. Hymus, E. H. DeLucia, B. G. Drake, D. F. Karnosky, and S. P. Long
Respiratory Oxygen Uptake Is Not Decreased by an Instantaneous Elevation of [CO2], But Is Increased with Long-Term Growth in the Field at Elevated [CO2]
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2004; 134(1): 520 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. S. ZHA, S. KELLOMAKI, and K-Y WANG
Seasonal Variation in Respiration of 1-year-old Shoots of Scots Pine Exposed to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Temperature for 4 Years
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2003; 92(1): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Pinelli and F. Loreto
12CO2 emission from different metabolic pathways measured in illuminated and darkened C3 and C4 leaves at low, atmospheric and elevated CO2 concentration
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2003; 54(388): 1761 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
K.-Y. WANG, T. ZHA, and S. KELLOMAKI
Measuring and Simulating Crown Respiration of Scots Pine with Increased Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Enrichment
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2002; 90(3): 325 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Amthor, G. W. Koch, J. R. Willms, and D. B. Layzell
Leaf O2 uptake in the dark is independent of coincident CO2 partial pressure
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2001; 52(364): 2235 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists