|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 98:1020-1028 (1992) © 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists Proline Fed to Intact Soybean Plants Influences Acetylene Reducing Activity and Content and Metabolism of Proline in Bacteroids 1Biology Department, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Supplying L-proline to the root system of intact soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants stimulated acetylene reducing activity to the same extent as did supplying succinate. Feeding L-proline also caused an increase in bacteroid proline dehydrogenase activity that was highly correlated with the increase in acetylene-reducing activity. Twenty-four hours after irrigating with L-proline, endogenous proline content had increased in host cell cytoplasm and bacteroids, about three- and eightfold, respectively. In bacteroids, proline concentration was calculated to be at least 3.5 millimolar. In experiments in which [U-14C]L-proline was supplied to uprooted, intact plants incubated in aerated solution, 14C-labeled products of proline metabolism, as well as [14C]proline itself, accumulated in both host cells and bacteroids. When plants were incubated in aerated solutions containing [5-3H]L-proline, 3H-labeled proline was found in host cells and bacteroids. [3H] Pyrroline-5-carboxylate was found in bacteroids, but not host cells, after a 2-hour incubation in [5-3H]L-proline. When [U-14C]L-proline was supplied for 24 hours, a significant amount of [14C] pyrroline-5-carboxylate was found in the host cells, in contrast with the results from the shorter incubation in [5-3H]proline, although the amount in the host cells was only about half the quantity found in the bacteroids. Taken as a whole, these results indicate that proline crosses both plant and bacterial membranes under the in vivo experimental conditions utilized and are consistent with a significant role for proline as an energy source in support of bacteroid functioning. In spite of the increase in acetylene-reducing activity when proline was supplied to the root system of intact plants, proline application did not rescue stemgirdled plants from loss of acetylene-reducing activity, although succinate application did. This suggests a nonphloem route for succinate, but not proline, from roots to nodules.
1 This research was supported by grant GM38786 from the National Institutes of Health to D.H.K. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|