Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 99:762-764 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dallmier, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dallmier, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dallmier, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C. R.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Effect of Exogenous Abscisic Acid on Proline Dehydrogenase Activity in Maize (Zea mays L.) 1

Kenneth A. Dallmier and Cecil R. Stewart

Department of Botany, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011

Plant responses to drought stress include proline and abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation. Proline dehydrogenase (PDH) (EC 1.4.3) is the first enzyme in the proline oxidation pathway, and its activity has been shown to decline in response to water stress (PJ Rayapati, CR Stewart [1991] Plant Physiol 95: 787-791). In this investigation, we determined whether ABA treatment affects PDH activity in a manner similar to drought stress in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Four exogenous ABA treatments (0, 11, 33, and 100 micromolar ABA) were applied to well-watered maize seedlings. Mitochondria were isolated and PDH was solubilized using Nonidet P-40. PDH activity was measured by the reduction of iodonitrotetrazolium violet under proline-dependent conditions. There was no effect of ABA on PDH activity at 33 and 100 micromolar ABA, but there was a 38% decline at 11 micromolar. This decline was less than the 69% reduction in activity under drought stress. Endogenous ABA determinations and plant growth rate showed that ABA entered the plant and was affecting metabolic processes. ABA treatments had a small effect on shoot and root proline concentration, whereas drought stress caused a 220% increase in root tissues. We conclude that ABA is not part of the pathway linking drought stress and decreased PDH activity.


1 Supported by U.S. Department of Agriculture NRICRG-90-37280-5665.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. B. Bruce, G. O. Edmeades, and T. C. Barker
Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2002; 53(366): 13 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists