Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 99:1309-1313 (1992)
© 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guralnick, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ting, I. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guralnick, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ting, I. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guralnick, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ting, I. P.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Fluorescence Quenching in the Varied Photosynthetic Modes of Portulacaria afra (L.) Jacq. 1

Lonnie J. Guralnick, Robert L. Heath, Guillermo Goldstein and Irwin P. Ting

Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Western Oregon State College, Monmouth, Oregon 97361, Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, Laboratory of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024

The kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence were measured in Portulacaria afra (L.) Jacq. when the plants were functioning in either Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) or C3/CAM cycling (called cycling) modes, as determined by fluctuation in titratable acidity and gas exchange properties. Cycling plants showed primarily daytime CO2 uptake typical of C3 plants, but with a slight diurnal acid fluctuation, whereas CAM plants showed nocturnal CO2 uptake, daytime stomatal closure, and a large diurnal acid fluctuation. Results from fluorescence measurements indicated no significant differences in photochemical quenching between cycling and CAM plants; however, sizable differences were detected in nonphoto-chemical quenching (qN), with the largest differences being observed during the middle of the day. Cycling plants had lower qN than CAM plants, indicating altered photosynthetic regulation processes. This qN difference was believed to be related to reduced internal CO2 concentration in the CAM plants because of daytime stomatal closure and reduced deacidification rates in the late afternoon when most of the malic acid has been utilized. Experimentally, higher external CO2 given to plants in the CAM mode resulted in a decline in qN in comparison to that measured in plants in the cycling mode. No changes were observed in photochemical quenching when CO2 was added.


1 This research was supported, in part, by National Science Foundation grant DCB-8807860 (to I.P.T).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists