Plant Physiol. (1998) 116: 27-35
PNZIP Is a Novel Mesophyll-Specific
cDNA That Is Regulated by Phytochrome and a Circadian Rhythm and
Encodes a Protein with a Leucine Zipper Motif1
Cheng Chao Zheng2,
Ron Porat2,
Pengzhe Lu, and
Sharman D. O' Neill*
Section of Plant Biology, Division of Biological Sciences,
University of California, Davis, California 95616
 |
ABSTRACT |
We
isolated and characterized a novel light-regulated cDNA from the
short-day plant Pharbitis nil that encodes a protein
with a leucine (Leu) zipper motif, designated PNZIP
(Pharbitis nil Leu zipper).
The PNZIP cDNA is not similar to any other gene with a
known function in the database, but it shares high sequence homology
with an Arabidopsis expressed sequence tag and to two other sequences
of unknown function from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis spp. and the red alga Porphyra
purpurea, which together define a new family of evolutionarily
conserved Leu zipper proteins. PNZIP is a single-copy
gene that is expressed specifically in leaf photosynthetically active
mesophyll cells but not in other nonphotosynthetic tissues such as the
epidermis, trichomes, and vascular tissues. When plants were exposed to
continuous darkness, PNZIP exhibited a rhythmic pattern
of mRNA accumulation with a circadian periodicity of approximately
24 h, suggesting that its expression is under the control of an
endogenous clock. However, the expression of PNZIP was
unusual in that darkness rather than light promoted its mRNA
accumulation. Accumulation of PNZIP mRNA during the dark
is also regulated by phytochrome, since a brief exposure to red light
in the middle of the night reduced its mRNA levels. Moreover, a
far-red-light treatment at the end of day also reduced
PNZIP mRNA accumulation during the dark, and that effect
could be inhibited by a subsequent exposure to red light, showing the
photoreversible response attributable to control through the
phytochrome system.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Light is essential for normal plant growth and development not
only as a source of energy but also as an environmental signal that
regulates various developmental and metabolic processes. These
light-regulated responses occur throughout the entire life cycle of the
plant, including seed germination, seedling de-etiolation, leaf and
chloroplast development, flowering, and eventually, senescence (Kendrick and Korenberg, 1994). The perception and transduction of the
light signals are governed by at least three families of photoreceptors, including the phytochrome (red and far-red) receptors, blue-light receptors, and UV receptors (Deng, 1994
; Quail et al., 1995
;
Chamovitz and Deng, 1996
). In addition to light-regulated development
and gene expression, it has been reported that certain light-inducible
genes, especially nuclear-encoded photosynthetic genes, are controlled
also by a circadian rhythm (Guiliano et al., 1988; Nagy et al., 1988
;
Taylor, 1989
; Piechulla, 1993
). Because all rhythmically regulated
genes characterized to date are also light regulated, it has been
proposed that there is an interaction between light and the endogenous
circadian rhythm (Lumsden, 1991
; Dunlap, 1996
).
During the past few years many light-regulated genes from different
species have been identified, and among the most extensively studied
have been the genes that code for the chlorophyll
a/b-binding protein of PSII (CAB), the small subunit of
ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcS), and chalcone synthase
(CHS; for review, see Li et al., 1993
; Terzaghi and Cashmore, 1995
).
Through the analysis of the promotors of these genes, multiple
light-responsive elements were identified and used to isolate cDNA
clones encoding proteins binding to these DNA sequences (Gilmartin et
al., 1990
; Li et al., 1993
; Terzaghi and Cashmore, 1995
). It is
interesting that many of these DNA-binding proteins, including
Arabidopsis GBF1-4, parsley CPRF1-3, and wheat HBP-1a, belong to the
bZIP family of transcription factors (Weisshaar et al., 1991
; Schindler
et al., 1992
; Feldbrugge et al., 1994
; Menkens and Cashmore, 1994
).
However, although considerable progress has been made in identifying
these promotor elements and DNA-binding proteins, it was found that at
least two different promotor elements are required to allow light-regulated transcription and that most of the DNA-binding proteins
isolated so far are themselves not light regulated, suggesting that
other regulatory proteins, such as a possible repressor in the dark or
an activator in the light, are required to regulate light-responsive
transcription. Light-regulated gene expression may be accomplished
through the coordination of multiple-component protein complexes and
promotor elements, but only some of them have been isolated so far
(Gilmartin et al., 1990
; Li et al., 1993
; Terzaghi and Cashmore,
1995
).
To identify additional light-regulated genes that may be involved in
the light signal transduction pathway, we isolated by differential
hybridization several cDNAs corresponding to mRNAs in which abundance
is altered after the transition of the short-day plant Pharbitis
nil cotyledons to continuous darkness (Zheng et al., 1993
;
O'Neill et al., 1994
). In this paper we describe the identification
and characterization of a cDNA named PNZIP (for Pharbitis
nil Leu
zipper), which is a novel plant cDNA that is
homologous to an Arabidopsis EST, which was fully sequenced by us, and
to two more unknown ORFs from the cyanobacterium
Synechocystis spp. and the red alga Porphyra
purpurea. Together, these genes form a new family of
evolutionarily highly conserved Leu zipper proteins. In P. nil, PNZIP mRNA accumulates during the dark
specifically in the leaf mesophyll cells, and its expression is
regulated by both phytochrome and a circadian clock. Given that
PNZIP encodes a Leu zipper protein, it is possible that
PNZIP may heterodimerize with other mesophyll bZIP DNA-binding proteins
and thus act as a negative regulator of light-induced gene expression
during darkness.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Pharbitis nil Choisy strain Violet (Japanese morning
glory) was used for all experiments. Seeds of this Pharbitis
strain were originally obtained from Marutane Co., Ltd (Kyoto,
Japan) and maintained as an inbred line for more than 12 generations at the University of California, Davis. Seeds were
scarified in concentrated sulfuric acid for 45 min on a stirring plate
at room temperature, rinsed well for 15 min under a continuous stream
of deionized water, and then allowed to rehydrate in aerated, distilled
water for 12 to 16 h. The germinated seeds were planted in trays
containing a standard soil mixture and held in a growth chamber under
continuous fluorescent light (250 µmol m
2
s
1; VHO/EW 185 W/1500 mA Philips, Mahwah, NJ)
at 28°C until germination was complete. The 1st d of seedling
emergence was designated d 1 in our experiments.
Photoperiodic and Light Treatments
Photoperiodic and light treatments were routinely initiated at
4:30 pm (0 h) on postgerminated 6-d-old seedlings grown
under continuous light. These treatments included an extended dark
treatment of up to 48 h; an NB with 10 min of red-light
interruption given at 8 h into the dark period; and an end-of-day
treatment with 10 min of red, far-red, red/far-red, or far-red/red
light, prior to the transfer to darkness. For red-light treatments four
fluorescent tubes (Philips F30T12/CW/RS) were filtered with a
3-mm-thick translucent red plexiglass sheet (Acrylite GP, color 210-0;
CYRO Industries, Mt. Arlington, NJ) as described previously (Zheng et
al., 1993
; O'Neill et al., 1994
). The far-red source consisted of two
fluorescent tubes (F48T12/660 nm/VHO, Sylvania) filtered with a
3-mm-thick translucent far-red plexiglass sheet (FRS700, Rohm and Haas,
Philadelphia, PA, dye no. 58015) as described by Li and Lagarias
(1994)
. At the end of each treatment the seedling tissue was harvested
in complete darkness directly into liquid nitrogen, transferred to light-proof plastic containers, and stored at
80°C for later use in
RNA extraction.
For the end-of-day treatments, 10 plants were returned to the growth
chamber for an additional 2 to 3 weeks of growth in continuous light to
examine the effectiveness of the photoperiodic light treatment on
floral induction. Flowering was assessed by determining the amount of
flower buds per plant.
cDNA Library Construction
Total RNA was isolated as described previously (O'Neill, 1992
).
Poly(A+) RNA was isolated using paramagnetic
oligo(dT) beads (Dynabeads, Dynal, Great Neck, NY) according to the
manufacturer's suggestions. LiCl was removed from the
poly(A+) RNA by two ethanol precipitations prior
to first-strand cDNA synthesis. Libraries were constructed from 5 µg
of poly(A+) RNA isolated from 6-d-old cotyledon
tissue treated with 8 to 12 h of darkness. cDNA was constructed
and cloned into the
ZAPII phage vector (Stratagene) according to the
manufacturer's procedures. The cotyledon-specific cDNA library
contained approximately 3 × 106 clones,
approximately 95% of which contained inserts.
cDNA Library Screening
Differential screening of the cotyledon-specific cDNA library was
carried out as follows. cDNAs were labeled with
[32P]dATP in 50-µL reverse-transcription
reactions containing 5 µg of poly(A+) RNA, 1.5 µg of oligo(dT)12-18 mers (Pharmacia), 40 units of RNasin (Promega),
50 µm dATP, 500 µm dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP,
1× reverse transcriptase buffer (GIBCO-BRL), 10 mm DTT,
12.5 µL of [
-32P]dATP (6000 Ci/mmol), and 600 units
of Superscript reverse transcriptase (GIBCO-BRL) at 37°C for 1 h. Approximately 0.5 × 106 clones from the
cDNA library were plated, and replica filters (BA85 nitrocellulose,
Schleicher & Schuell) were made from each plate and screened by
differential hybridization using the 32P-labeled
cDNA probes as previously described (O'Neill et al., 1994
). Each
filter set was hybridized with first-strand cDNA probes synthesized
from either control or experimental poly(A+) RNA
probes. The control probe was synthesized using
poly(A+) RNA isolated from noninduced cotyledon
tissues, whereas the experimental probe was synthesized using
poly(A+) RNA isolated from cotyledon tissues that
were photoperiodically induced by 14 h of dark treatment.
Differentially hybridizing cDNA clones were identified by comparing the
autoradiograms of replica filters hybridized with both the control and
experimental probes. One cDNA clone corresponding to a differentially
abundant mRNA is described in this paper.
Sequence Analysis
Nucleotide sequencing was carried out by constructing a nested set
of deletion plasmids using the Erase-a-Base system (Promega) and
sequencing the deletions by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (Sanger et al., 1977
) using double-stranded DNA templates, 35S-dATP (Amersham), and Sequenase enzyme (United
States Biochemical). The nucleotide sequence was determined from
overlapping clones and from both strands. Sequence analysis and
multiple sequence alignment (PileUp) were accomplished by using the
Genetics Computer Group (University of Wisconsin, Madison) and BLAST
(Altschul et al., 1990
) computer programs. The GenBank accession
numbers of PNZIP and ATZIP are U37437 and U38232,
respectively.
DNA Gel-Blot Analysis
DNA was extracted from cotyledon tissue using the procedure
described by Jofuku and Goldberg (1988)
. Ten micrograms of genomic DNA
was digested with EcoRI, BamHI,
HindIII, or SacI (Promega), separated on a 0.7%
agarose gel, and blotted onto a Nytran membrane (Schleicher & Schuell).
Blots were hybridized with a PNZIP cDNA probe labeled to
high specific activity by random priming (Boehringer Mannheim) with
[32P]dCTP at 37°C in 50% formamide, 5× SSC
(1× SSC is 0.15 m NaCl and 0.015 m sodium
citrate), 0.05 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 5× Denhardt's
solution (1× Denhardt's is 0.02% Ficoll, 0.02% PVP, and 0.02%
BSA), 0.2 mg/mL sheared denatured salmon testes DNA (type III, Sigma),
and 0.2% SDS. Blots were washed three times for 20 min at 50, 55, and
60°C with 0.2× SSC and 0.1% SDS. Autoradiography was performed at
80°C using Kodak XAR-5 film and one intensifying screen (Cronex
Lightning Plus, DuPont). Blots were exposed for up to 2 d.
RNA Gel-Blot Analysis
The methods for RNA extraction and RNA gel-blot hybridization have
been described previously (O'Neill et al., 1994
). Total RNA (30 µg/lane) was separated on a 0.8% formaldehyde agarose gel and
blotted onto a Nytran membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). Blots were
hybridized with a PNZIP cDNA probe labeled to high specific
activity by random priming (Boehringer Mannheim) with [32P]dCTP at 42°C as described for DNA blot
hybridization (see above). Blots were washed three times for 20 min at
55, 60, and 65°C with 0.2× SSC and 0.1% SDS solution and
autoradiographed at
80°C using Kodak XAR-5 film and an intensifying
screen (Cronex Lightning Plus). Blots were exposed for approximately 2 to 3 d.
In Situ Hybridization
Tissues from cotyledons, leaves, hypocotyls, and shoots were fixed
for 4 to 6 h in 50 mm phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 4%
paraformaldehyde (Sigma), and 0.1% glutaraldehyde (Polysciences,
Warrington, PA). Afterward, the tissues were rinsed in phosphate buffer
alone and dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol (10-100%,
v/v). The tissues were embedded in Paraplast Plus (Oxford Labware, St. Louis, MO), cut into 7-µm sections, and mounted on Superfrost Plus
microscope slides (Fisher Scientific). For the synthesis of
PNZIP antisense and sense transcripts, a 1008-bp
XbaI-KpnI cDNA fragment within the ORF was
ligated into pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene) and
transcribed in vitro with digoxigenin-UTP using T3 or T7 polymerases
(Boehringer Mannheim). Prehybridization, hybridization, washings, RNase
treatment, and immunological detection of the incorporated
digoxigenin-UTP were performed using a digoxigenin nucleic acid
detection system (Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. Photographic images were recorded on Kodak Royal Gold
25 film, using a photomicroscope system (BX60, Olympus).
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation and Characterization of PNZIP
cDNA
By differential hybridization screening of a P. nil cDNA library that was constructed from
poly(A+) RNA isolated from dark-induced
cotyledons, we identified and isolated a cDNA clone that corresponded
to an mRNA in which abundance increased during the dark. After complete
sequencing this cDNA was named PNZIP (see above). The
full-length cDNA sequence of PNZIP consists of 1402 bp, with
an ORF of 1110 bp. The PNZIP gene encodes a predicted
polypeptide of 370 amino acids, with a predicted molecular mass of
approximately 43 kD and a pI of 8.37.
The PNZIP protein contains a Leu zipper motif between amino acid
residues 228 and 256 (Fig. 1). The Leu
zipper begins with a Met residue that was reported to serve as the best
substitute for Leu and is found in many known Leu zippers (Landschulz
et al., 1988; Hu et al., 1990
). This is followed by three periodic repetitions of Leu residues that appear every seventh position (Fig.
1). At the next seventh position after these Leu repeats, there is a
Tyr residue that has a long aromatic side chain and was reported to
functionally replace Leu residues in various Leu zippers (Hu et al.,
1990
; Kusano et al., 1995
; Nantel and Quatrano, 1996
). Altogether, the
PNZIP Leu zipper contains five heptadic repeats of hydrophobic amino
acids and contains the minimum of three Leu residues, which were
reported to be required for dimerization (Landschulz et al., 1988; Hu
et al., 1990
).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
Alignment of the predicted polypeptides of
P. nil PNZIP, A. thaliana ATZIP,
Synechocystis spp. ORF, and P. purpurea
ORF. Amino acids that are identical in at least three of the four
different proteins are in closed boxes. The Leu zipper, hydrophilic
domain, and hydrophobic domain are marked in black. The Leu residues in the Leu-rich region are in bold type, and the Arg and Lys residues in
the possible nuclear localization domain are in bold and underlined. The GenBank accession numbers of PNZIP,
ATZIP, Synechocystis spp. ORF, and
P. purpurea ORF are U37437, U38232, D90899, and U38804,
respectively.
|
|
Unlike bZIP transcription factors that have a basic domain adjacent to
the Leu zipper (Vinson et al., 1989
; Izawa et al., 1993
), PNZIP does
not contain a typical basic domain but, rather, has a hydrophilic
domain (Fig. 1). It is possible that this hydrophilic region of PNZIP
interacts with the basic domain of other bZIPs and thus supports
possible heterodimerization between the Leu zipper motifs. The PNZIP
protein also contains a hydrophobic domain rich in Ala, Ile, Leu, Met,
and Val at the C terminus of the protein and a Leu-rich region between
amino acid residues 143 and 159 (Fig. 1). These regions may be involved
in selective protein-protein interactions (Kobe and Deisenhofer, 1994
).
PNZIP contains a possible nuclear localization signal that consists of
the conserved basic amino acids Arg and Lys and appears between amino
acid residues 113 and 121 (Raikhel, 1992
; Fig. 1).
PNZIP Defines a New Family of Evolutionarily Conserved Proteins
Comparison of the PNZIP cDNA with the database of known
sequences revealed no obvious similarity with any other genes of known function. However, by searching the Arabidopsis EST database with the
PNZIP cDNA, we identified and fully sequenced an Arabidopsis cDNA that was homologous to PNZIP and was named
ATZIP by us (for Arabidopsis
thaliana Leu
zipper). In addition, the PNZIP protein was also
homologous to two other ORFs with an unknown function from
Synechocystis spp. and P. purpurea that were just
recently submitted to the GenBank database (Reith and Munholland, 1995
;
Kaneko et al., 1996
).
Altogether, the proteins of the Pharbitis PNZIP,
Arabidopsis ATZIP, and the ORFs from Synechocystis
spp. (S.ORF) and P. purpurea (P.ORF) form a new family of
evolutionarily highly conserved proteins (Fig. 1). All of the different
proteins contain the Leu zipper motif, the hydrophilic domain adjacent
to it, the C-terminal hydrophobic domain, the Leu-rich region, and the
possible nuclear localization signal with only minor modifications,
suggesting that these motifs serve a conserved evolutionary function
(Fig. 1).
The pairwise identity between PNZIP and ATZIP is 86%, whereas that
between PNZIP and the Synechocystis spp. ORF and P. purpurea ORF is only 60 and 59%, respectively. The pairwise
similarity between PNZIP and ATZIP and the ORFs from
Synechocystis spp. and P. purpurea are 94, 81, and 80%, respectively. The relationships between the different members
of the PNZIP family as observed by phylogenetic comparison emphasizes
that the higher plant proteins form a separate class from the
cyanobacterial and red algal proteins (data not shown).
Genomic DNA Gel-Blot Hybridization Analysis of PNZIP
To determine whether PNZIP represents a single locus in
the P. nil genome or whether it is a multicopy gene, genomic
DNA gel-blot hybridization analysis was performed using the
PNZIP cDNA sequence as a probe. The results showed that
PNZIP hybridized to only one genomic restriction fragment,
suggesting that it represents a single-copy gene (data not shown). A
similar DNA gel-blot hybridization analysis of the Arabidopsis genome
using the ATZIP cDNA as a probe revealed similar results
(data not shown), suggesting that the PNZIP gene probably
represents a single locus also in the genome of other plants.
Expression of the PNZIP Gene in
Different Organs
Since the PNZIP cDNA was isolated from a cDNA
library that was constructed from poly(A+) RNA
isolated from cotyledons of P. nil seedlings, we wanted to
examine whether the expression of PNZIP was specific to the cotyledons or was also expressed in other organs. Figure
2 shows that a 1.4-kb transcript was
strongly detected in the cotyledons, more weakly in the hypocotyl
tissue, but could not be detected at all in the root. These results
suggest that the PNZIP gene is expressed especially in
cotyledons, less in other green vegetative tissues, but not at all in
nonphotosynthetic tissues such as the roots.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
RNA gel-blot hybridization analysis of
PNZIP mRNA accumulation in different P. nil organs. Each lane contained 30 µg of total RNA isolated
from cotyledons, hypocotyls, or roots. Hybridization to a ubiquitin
cDNA probe served as a control for equal loading of RNA in each lane.
Numbers on the right indicate the approximate sizes of the mRNAs
detected.
|
|
Regulation of PNZIP Gene Expression by a Circadian
Rhythm and Phytochrome
PNZIP cDNA was initially isolated by a differential
hybridization screening because of its increased mRNA levels during the dark. To further study the light and dark regulation of
PNZIP gene expression and the possible role of the
phytochrome in this process, we performed RNA gel-blot hybridizations
using RNA isolated from plants grown under various light treatments.
Figure 3 shows the circadian regulation
of PNZIP mRNA accumulation. P. nil seedlings were
pretreated with continuous light, and on the evening of the 6th d they
were transferred to complete darkness. The results show that levels of
PNZIP mRNA increased markedly within 8 to 12 h of
darkness and began to decline after 16 h, returning to its basal
level after 20 to 24 h (Fig. 3). The pattern of PNZIP
mRNA abundance appeared to be under the control of a circadian rhythm,
since this pattern of accumulation and loss appeared to repeat at
cycles of approximately 24 h. During a continuous dark treatment
of 48 h, PNZIP mRNA levels peaked after 12 and 36 h and were at their lowest levels at 0, 24, and 48 h (Fig. 3).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
RNA gel-blot hybridization analysis of
PNZIP mRNA levels during an extended dark treatment.
Seedlings were grown in continuous light for 6 d and than
transferred to darkness for 0 to 48 h. At the hours indicated,
plants were harvested and their RNA was isolated. Each lane contained
30 µg of cotyledon total RNA. Hybridization to a ubiquitin cDNA probe
served as a control for equal loading of RNA in each lane. Numbers on
the right indicate the approximate sizes of the mRNAs detected.
|
|
To study the possible role of phytochrome in the regulation of
PNZIP gene expression, we examined the effects of an
end-of-day treatment on PNZIP transcript accumulation. The
end-of-day treatment consisted of a brief illumination with red or
far-red light at the end of the main light period just before the
transition to darkness. This end-of-day treatment is well known to
affect flowering in different short-day plants including P. nil (Takimoto, 1967
; Fig. 4A). When
a red-light treatment was given at the end of the day, it had no effect
on the normal accumulation of PNZIP mRNA during the dark as
indicated after 4 or 14 h (Fig. 4B). However, when a far-red-light
treatment was given, it reduced the accumulation of PNZIP
mRNA as shown after both 4 and 14 h of darkness (Fig. 4B). The
effects of both red- and far-red-light treatments were reversible when
subsequent far-red- or red-light treatments were given shortly after
them (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 4.
Effects of end-of-day treatments of P. nil seedlings with red and far-red light on flowering and
PNZIP mRNA accumulation during the dark. Seedlings were
grown in continuous light for 6 d, and just before the transition
to darkness at 0 h they were exposed for 10 min to red (R),
far-red (FR), far-red and then red (FR/R), or red and afterward far-red
(R/FR) light. A, Effects of end-of-day treatments on flower induction
as measured after 3 weeks. Error bars indicate ses. B, RNA
gel-blot hybridization analysis of PNZIP mRNA levels
detected 4 and 14 h after the end-of-day treatments. Each lane
contained 30 µg of cotyledon total RNA. A photograph of the amount of
rRNA served as a control for equal loading of RNA in each lane. Numbers
on the right indicate the approximate sizes of the mRNAs detected. The
black and white bar at the bottom of the figure schematically presents
the light/dark conditions and the timings of light treatments and RNA
isolation.
|
|
The role of phytochrome in the regulation of PNZIP gene
expression was further investigated by examining the effect of a 10-min red-light NB treatment given precisely 8 h after the transition to
darkness, a treatment that inhibits the photoperiodic induction of
flowering. Figure 5 shows that the NB
treatment decreased the accumulation of PNZIP mRNA during
the darkness as detected after 12, 16, or 20 h.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 5.
RNA gel-blot hybridization analysis of
PNZIP mRNA accumulation during continuous darkness or
following an NB treatment. Seedlings were grown in continuous light for
6 d and then treated with three durations of darkness (DK 12, 16, or 20 h) or were interrupted at the 8th h of dark treatment by a
10-min NB with red light. Each lane contained 30 µg of cotyledon
total RNA. Hybridization to a ubiquitin cDNA probe served as a control
for equal loading of RNA in each lane. Numbers on the right indicate
the approximate sizes of the mRNAs detected. The black and white bars
at the bottom of the figure schematically presents the light/dark
conditions and the timings of the NB treatment and RNA isolation.
|
|
In Situ Localization of PNZIP mRNA Accumulation
To define the spatial pattern of PNZIP gene expression
in different tissues and following different light treatments, we
conducted RNA in situ-hybridization experiments using a
PNZIP digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA as the probe. Figure
6A shows that PNZIP mRNA could not be detected in the shoot apical meristem or in the leaf primordia that covers it. However, in a transverse section through a young expanding leaf that was taken from the fourth or fifth position below
the shoot apical meristem, PNZIP mRNA was found in the cells of the leaf blade that were beginning to differentiate into mesophyll cells and in the subepidermal cells of the main leaf vein (Fig. 6B). In
the hypocotyl tissue PNZIP mRNA could be clearly detected in
the subepidermal cells but not in the epidermis or other cortical cells
(Fig. 6C). A control section of a hypocotyl hybridized with a
PNZIP sense strand did not show any hybridization signal
(Fig. 6D).

View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 6.
In situ localization of PNZIP mRNA
in different P. nil organs and following various light
treatments. Seedlings were grown in continuous light for 6 d and
then were exposed to 12 h of darkness or were interrupted at the
8th h by a 10-min NB with red light. Afterward, longitudinal and
transverse sections (7 µm thick) through the shoot meristem,
hypocotyl, cotyledon, and leaf tissues were collected and
hybridized with a PNZIP antisense RNA probe (A-C, E, G,
I, and J) or a PNZIP sense RNA probe as a control (D, F, and H). Probes were labeled with digoxigenin-UTP. The
transcript-specific hybridization signal is shown in purple. A,
Vegetative shoot meristem of a 7-d-old seedling. B, Young expanding
leaf taken from the fourth or fifth position below the shoot meristem.
C, Hypocotyl. D, Hypocotyl hybridized with a PNZIP sense
RNA probe as a control. E, Cotyledon. F, Cotyledon hybridized with a
PNZIP sense RNA probe as a control. G, Leaf. H, Leaf
hybridized with a PNZIP sense RNA probe as a control. I,
Higher magnification of a young leaf. J, Young leaf after an NB
treatment. ep, Epidermis; lb, leaf blade; le, leaf; me, mesophyll; mv,
main vein; su, subepidermis; tr, trichome; vm, vegetative meristem; and
vt, vascular tissue. Bar = 25 µm.
|
|
In the cotyledons PNZIP mRNA accumulated specifically in the
leaf mesophyll and could be detected especially in the palisade parenchyma and spongy mesophyll cells (Fig. 6E). A control section of a
cotyledon hybridized with a PNZIP sense strand did not show any hybridization signal (Fig. 6F). The strongest accumulation of
PNZIP mRNA was observed in the leaf tissue and was specific to the leaf mesophyll cells but not in the epidermis (Fig. 6G). Again,
a control section of a leaf hybridized with a PNZIP sense strand did not show any detected hybridization signal (Fig. 6H). Figure
6I is an enlargement of the leaf tissue, showing more clearly the
specific accumulation of PNZIP mRNA in the mesophyll cells but not in the epidermal cells, vascular tissue, or trichomes. After an
NB treatment, the accumulation of PNZIP mRNA in the leaf mesophyll cells was strongly reduced (Fig. 6J).
 |
DISCUSSION |
PNZIP Defines a New Family of
Evolutionary Conserved Leu Zipper Proteins
The Leu zipper motif serves as a dimerization domain by allowing
the Leu side chains from one helix to interdigitate with those of a
matching helix of a second polypeptide. The characteristic features of
a Leu zipper are the periodic repetitions of at least four Leus or
alternative substitutes that appear at every seventh position along the
protein (Landschultz et al., 1988
; Vinson et al., 1989
; Hu et al.,
1990
). The PNZIP protein contains a Met residue at position 228, which,
similar to Leu, has a long hydrophobic side chain that is bulky at its
tip, and afterward contains three periodic repetitions of Leu residues
followed by a Tyr residue. All together, the PNZIP Leu zipper contains
five periodic repetitions of hydrophobic amino acids that are separated
by charged or polar amino acids and is likely to promote a functional
dimerization domain.
It is interesting that all of the domains detected in PNZIP,
including the Leu zipper, the Leu-rich region, the hydrophilic and
hydrophobic domains, and the possible nuclear localization signal, were
found also to be highly conserved in an Arabidopsis EST cDNA that was
fully sequenced by us and in two other unknown ORFs from
Synechocystis spp. and P. purpurea. For example,
the only difference in the Leu zipper motif is the replacement of the
third Leu with a Met in the P. purpurea ORF (Fig. 1). The hydrophilic region, on the other hand, appeared to be completely conserved among all of the proteins (Fig. 1).
The highly conserved primary sequence between the higher plant PNZIP
and ATZIP and the lower photosynthetic cyanobacterial and red algal
ORFs suggests that these proteins may serve a conserved evolutionary
function. Since all of these proteins contain a Leu zipper motif, it is
possible that they can dimerize with other Leu zipper proteins However,
since these members of the PNZIP protein family are distinct from other
known Leu zipper proteins, it is also possible that they share some
unique type of interactions and functions. Despite the overall
similarities, the higher plant proteins PNZIP and ATZIP form a separate
class that distinguishes them from that of the cyanobacterial and red
algal proteins. It is possible that they have evolved an additional
function that is specific to higher plants, such as the regulation of
flower development (O'Neill, 1992
).
PNZIP Is Expressed in the Mesophyll
Cells and Is Regulated by Phytochrome and a Circadian Rhythm
RNA gel-blot hybridization analysis revealed that PNZIP
mRNA accumulated mainly in the cotyledons and only slightly in the hypocotyl but not at all in the roots (Fig. 2). More detailed analysis
of the pattern of PNZIP gene expression by RNA in situ hybridization confirmed these results and explored more clearly that
PNZIP mRNA accumulated in the cotyledons and leaves (Fig. 6,
E and G). Within the leaf tissue, PNZIP mRNA accumulated
specifically in the photosynthetically active mesophyll cells but not
in the nonphotosynthetic tissues such as the epidermis, trichomes, and vascular tissues (Fig. 6I).
When plants were held in continuous darkness, PNZIP
exhibited a rhythmic pattern of mRNA accumulation with a circadian
periodicity of approximately 24 h (Fig. 3). This pattern for
PNZIP is unusual in that darkness rather than light promoted
its mRNA accumulation, in a manner opposite to that reported for most
other light-regulated genes and especially for the genes encoding
proteins of the light-harvesting complex of PSI/PSII (Guiliano et al.,
1988; Nagy et al., 1988
; Millar and Kay, 1991
; Piechulla, 1993
).
Therefore, although PNZIP is expressed in the
photosynthetically active mesophyll cells, it is expressed in a manner
opposite to that of most of the photosynthetic genes. Other genes that
exhibit an unusual circadian rhythm pattern are the Arabidopsis
Gly-rich proteins Ccr1 and Ccr2 and the Arabidopsis and maize catalase
genes CAT3 and Cat3, respectively, which peak at
the end of the light period and at the beginning of the dark phase
(Redinbaugh et al., 1990
; Carpenter et al., 1994
; Zhong and McClung,
1996
). Another gene that has been identified in which mRNA accumulation
is suppressed by light is the Arabidopsis HMG1; however, it
is not under the control of a circadian rhythm (Learned, 1996
).
The accumulation of PNZIP mRNA during the dark is regulated
by phytochrome, an observation that is supported by several different sets of results. For example, a far-red illumination at the end of the
day reduced the levels of PNZIP mRNA accumulation, whereas a
subsequent irradiation with red light reversed this response (Fig.
4). Moreover, a brief NB treatment of red light during the middle of
the night markedly reduced the levels of PNZIP mRNA accumulation as indicated by both RNA gel-blot hybridization (Fig. 5)
and RNA in situ hybridization (Fig. 6J).
It is interesting that a red-light treatment given at the end of the
light period had no observable effect on PNZIP mRNA
accumulation during the dark, whereas the same treatment given during
the dark phase markedly reduced its transcript accumulation (Figs. 4
and 5). This suggests that a red-light treatment is not effective by
itself but, rather, only when applied during a particular phase of the
circadian rhythm. Since phytochrome is known to be involved in the
oscillation of the circadian rhythm (Lumsden, 1991
), the inhibitory
effects of a far-red illumination at the end of the day and a red-light
NB treatment during the middle of the night may be indirect and may
have a role in shifting the phase of the circadian clock.
Possible Role of PNZIP in
Light-Regulated Gene Expression
Leu zipper proteins without a basic domain are present in both
animal and plant kingdoms (Kageyama and Pasten, 1989; Ron and Habener,
1992
; Vatten et al., 1992
; Bange et al., 1994
; Sun et al., 1996
). They
have been demonstrated to act as negative transcriptional regulators by
forming nonfunctional heterodimeric complexes with those transcription
factors that contain the basic domain. For example, the rat CHOP Leu
zipper protein negatively regulates transcription by heterodimerizing
with the C/EBP and LAP bZIP transcription factors (Ron and Habener,
1992
). A similar mechanism for the negative regulation of gene
expression by forming competitive heterodimeric complexes was also
reported for helix-loop-helix proteins (Van Doren et al., 1991
).
According to this role for Leu zipper proteins and the specific
accumulation of PNZIP mRNA in the mesophyll cells during the dark period, at the same time that the mRNA levels of many
photosynthetic genes are declining suggests that PNZIP may be involved
in the negative regulation of these genes during the dark. The
transcription factors that bind to the G-box element of the Arabidopsis
rbcS promotor belong to the bZIP class, and at least
GBF1 and GBF2 were reported to be expressed
ubiquitously in the light and in the dark (Schindler et al., 1992
).
Therefore, it is possible that PNZIP may negatively regulate
rbcS gene expression during the dark by forming
nonfunctional heterodimers with these transcription factors.
For the future, we suggest that further research be done with
Arabidopsis using ATZIP, the Arabidopsis homolog of
PNZIP. Examining its possible protein-protein interactions
with GBF1 and GBF2 and directly assessing its
function by altering its expression in transgenic plants or by
obtaining a null mutant will provide further information about the
direct role of this gene in the regulation of light-induced gene
expression.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
1
This research was supported by grant no.
IBN-9317249 to S.D.O. from the National Science Foundation
Developmental Mechanisms Program.
2
C.C.Z. and R.P. contributed equally to this
publication.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail sdoneill{at}ucdavis.edu; fax
1-916-752-5410.
Received May 6, 1997;
accepted September 28, 1997.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
Abbreviations:
bZIP, basic Leu zipper.
EST, expressed sequence
tag.
NB, night break.
ORF, open reading frame.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank A. Bui, J. Nadeau, and D. Van Tassel for their
assistance. We also thank Dr. C.J. Lagarias (University of California, Davis) for the use of the red- and far-red-light filters and for his
help with the light treatments. The Arabidopsis Biological Resource
Center (Ohio State University, Columbus) is acknowledged for the gift
of the EST clone.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
Altschul SF,
Gish W,
Miller W,
Myers EW,
Lipman DJ
(1990)
Basic local alignment search tool.
J Mol Biol
215:
403-410
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bange FC,
Vogel U,
Flohr T,
Kiekenbeck M,
Denecke B,
Bottger EC
(1994)
IFP 35 is an interferon-induced leucine zipper protein that undergoes interferon-regulated cellular redistribution.
J Biol Chem
269:
1091-1098
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Carpenter CD,
Kreps JA,
Simon AE
(1994)
Genes encoding glycine-rich Arabidopsis thaliana proteins with RNA-binding motifs are influenced by cold treatment and an endogenous circadian rhythm.
Plant Physiol
104:
1015-1025
[Abstract]
Chamovitz DA,
Deng XW
(1996)
Light signaling in plants.
Crit Rev Plant Sci
15:
455-478
Deng XW
(1994)
Fresh view of light signal transduction in plants.
Cell
76:
423-426
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dunlap JC
(1996)
Genetics and molecular analysis of circadian rhythms.
Annu Rev Genet
30:
579-601
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Feldbrugge M,
Sprenger M,
Dinkelbach M,
Yazaki K,
Harter K,
Weisshaar B
(1994)
Functional analysis of a light-responsive plant bZIP transcription factor.
Plant Cell
6:
1607-1621
[Abstract]
Gilmartin PM,
Sarokin L,
Memelnik J,
Chua NH
(1990)
Molecular light switches for plant genes.
Plant Cell
2:
369-378
[Free Full Text]
Guilano G,
Hoffman NE,
Ko K,
Scolnick PA,
Cashmore AR
(1988)
A light-entrained circadian clock controls transcription of several plant genes.
EMBO J
7:
3635-3642
[ISI][Medline]
Hu JC,
O'Shea EK,
Kim PS,
Sauer RT
(1990)
Sequence requirements for coiled-coils: analysis with
repressor-GCN4 leucine zipper fusions.
Science
250:
1400-1403
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Izawa T,
Foster R,
Chua NH
(1993)
Plant bZIP protein DNA binding specificity.
J Mol Biol
230:
1131-1144
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jofuku KD,
Goldberg RB
(1988)
Analysis of plant gene structure.
In
CH Shaw,
eds, Plant Molecular Biology: A Practical Approach.
IRL Press, Oxford, UK, pp 37-66
Kageyama R,
Pastan I
(1989)
Molecular cloning and characterization of a human DNA binding factor that represses transcription.
Cell
59:
815-825
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kaneko T,
Sato S,
Kotani H,
Tanaka A,
Asamizu E,
Nakamura Y,
Miyajima N,
Hirosawa M,
Sugiura M,
Sasamoto S,
and others
(1996)
Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. II. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions.
DNA Res
3:
109-136
[Abstract]
Kendrick RE,
Kronenberg GHM
(1994)
Photomorphogenesis in Plants, Ed 2.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Kobe B,
Deisenhofer J
(1994)
The leucine-rich repeat: a versatile binding motif.
Trends Biochem Sci
19:
415-421
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kusano T,
Berberich T,
Harada M,
Suzuki N,
Sugawara K
(1995)
A maize DNA-binding factor with a bZIP motif is induced by low temperature.
Mol Gen Genet
248:
507-517
[CrossRef][Medline]
Landschultz WH,
Johnson PF,
McKnight SL
(1988)
The leucine zipper: a hypothetical structure common to a new class of DNA binding proteins.
Science
240:
1759-1764
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Learned RM
(1996)
Light suppresses 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Physiol
110:
645-655
[Abstract]
Li H,
Washburn T,
Chory J
(1993)
Regulation of gene expression by light.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
5:
455-460
[CrossRef][Medline]
Li L,
Lagarias CJ
(1994)
Phytochrome assembly in living cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
12533-12539
Lumsden PJ
(1991)
Circadian rhythms and phytochrome.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
42:
351-371
[CrossRef][ISI]
Menkens AE,
Cashmore AR
(1994)
Isolation and characterization of a fourth Arabidopsis thaliana G-box-binding factor, which has similarities to Fos oncoprotein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
2522-2526
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Millar AJ,
Kay SA
(1991)
Circadian control of cab gene transcription and mRNA accumulation in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
3:
541-550
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nagy F,
Kay SA,
Chua NH
(1988)
A circadian clock regulates transcription of the wheat Cab-1 gene.
Genes Dev
2:
376-382
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nantel A,
Quatrano RS
(1996)
Characterization of three rice basic/leucine zipper factors, including two inhibitors of EmBP-1 DNA binding activity.
J Biol Chem
271:
31296-31305
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
O'Neill SD
(1992)
The photoperiodic control of flowering: progress towards understanding the mechanism of induction.
Photochem Photobiol
56:
789-801
O'Neill SD,
Zhang XS,
Zheng CC
(1994)
Dark and circadian regulation of mRNA accumulation in the short-day plant Pharbitis nil.
Plant Physiol
104:
569-580
[Abstract]
Piechulla B
(1993)
`Circadian clock' directs the expression of plant genes.
Plant Mol Biol
22:
533-542
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Quail PH,
Boylan MT,
Parks BM,
Short TW,
Xu Y,
Wagner D
(1995)
Phytochromes: photosensory perception and signal transduction.
Science
268:
675-680
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Raikhel N
(1992)
Nuclear targeting in plants.
Plant Physiol
100:
1627-1632
[Free Full Text]
Redinbaugh MG,
Sabre M,
Scandalios JG
(1990)
Expression of the maize Cat3 catalase gene is under the influence of a circadian rhythm.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:
6853-6857
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Reith ME,
Munholland J
(1995)
Complete nucleotide sequence of the Porphyra purpurea chloroplast genome.
Plant Mol Biol Rep
13:
333-335
Ron D,
Habener JF
(1992)
CHOP, a novel developmentally regulated nuclear protein that dimerizes with transcription factors C/EBP and LAP and functions as a dominant-negative inhibitor of gene transcription.
Genes Dev
6:
439-453
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sanger F,
Nicklen S,
Coulson AR
(1977)
DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
74:
5463-5467
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schindler U,
Menkens AE,
Beckmann H,
Ecker JR,
Cashmore AR
(1992)
Heterodimerization between light-regulated and ubiquitously expressed Arabidopsis GBF bZIP proteins.
EMBO J
11:
1261-1273
[ISI][Medline]
Sun DS,
Chang AC,
Jenkins NA,
Gilbert DJ,
Copeland NG,
Chang NA
(1996)
Identification, molecular characterization, and chromosomal location of the cDNA encoding a novel leucine zipper motif-containing protein.
Genomics
36:
54-62
[CrossRef][Medline]
Takimoto A (1967) The spectral dependence of photoperiodic
responses. In S Imamura, ed, Physiology of Flowering in
Pharbitis nil. Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists,
Tokyo, Japan, pp 73-93
Taylor WC
(1989)
Transcriptional regulation by a circadian rhythm.
Plant Cell
1:
259-264
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Terzaghi WB,
Cashmore AR
(1995)
Light-regulated transcription.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
46:
445-474
[CrossRef][ISI]
Van Doren M,
Ellis HM,
Posakony JW
(1991)
The Drosophila extramacrochaetae antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete-scute protein complexes.
Development
113:
245-255
[Abstract]
Vatten NC,
Lu G,
Feri RJ
(1992)
A maize protein associated with the G-box binding complex has homology to brain regulatory proteins.
Plant Cell
4:
1295-1307
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vinson CR,
Sigler PB,
McKnight SL
(1989)
Scissors-grip model for DNA recognition by a family of leucine zipper proteins.
Science
246:
911-916
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Weisshaar B,
Armstrong GA,
Block A,
Silva OC,
Hahlbrock K
(1991)
Light-inducible and constitutively expressed DNA-binding proteins recognizing a plant promotor element with functional relevance in light responsiveness.
EMBO J
10:
1777-1786
[ISI][Medline]
Zheng CC,
Bui AQ,
O'Neill SD
(1993)
Abundance of an mRNA encoding a high mobility group DNA-binding protein is regulated by light and an endogenous rhythm.
Plant Mol Biol
23:
813-823
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Zhong HH,
McClung CR
(1996)
The circadian clock gates expression of two Arabidopsis catalase genes to distinct and opposite circadian phases.
Mol Gen Genet
251:
196-203
[Medline]