Plant Physiol. (1998) 116: 777-783

Respiratory Elicitors from Rhizobium meliloti Affect Intact Alfalfa Roots¹

Hanne Volpin and Donald A. Phillips^*

Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Molecules produced by Rhizobium meliloti increase respiration of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) roots. Maximum respiratory increases, measured either as CO₂ evolution or as O₂ uptake, were elicited in roots of 3-d-old seedlings by 16 h of exposure to living or dead R. meliloti cells at densities of 10⁷ bacteria/mL. Excising roots after exposure to bacteria and separating them into root-tip- and root-hair-containing segments showed that respiratory increases occurred only in the root-hair region. In such assays, CO₂ production by segments with root hairs increased by as much as 100% in the presence of bacteria. Two partially purified compounds from R. meliloti 1021 increased root respiration at very low, possibly picomolar, concentrations. One factor, peak B, resembled known pathogenic elicitors because it produced a rapid (15-min), transitory increase in respiration. A second factor, peak D, was quite different because root respiration increased slowly for 8 h and was maintained at the higher level. These molecules differ from lipo-chitin oligosaccharides active in root nodulation for the following reasons: (a) they do not curl alfalfa root hairs, (b) they are synthesized by bacteria in the absence of known plant inducer molecules, and (c) they are produced by a mutant R. meliloti that does not synthesize known lipo-chitin oligosaccharides. The peak-D compound(s) may benefit both symbionts by increasing CO₂, which is required for growth of R. meliloti, and possibly by increasing the energy that is available in the plant to form root nodules.

	INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Roots colonized by microorganisms evolve more CO₂ than sterile roots (Barber and Martin, 1976; Meharg and Killham, 1991). However, the source of the extra CO₂ is difficult to determine when both roots and microbes are respiring (Cheng et al., 1993; Swinnen, 1994). It is possible that increases in root-plus-bacterial respiration result when soil microorganisms first enhance root exudation and then respire C compounds in the exudate (Meharg and Killham, 1991). Alternative explanations, however, should also be considered. For example, cell wall fragments from pathogenic fungi increase plant cell respiration (Norman et al., 1994), and it is plausible that products from rhizosphere bacteria may have similar effects. In fact, plant-derived CO₂ may help Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium spp. rhizobia colonize roots because they require exogenous CO₂ for growth (Lowe and Evans, 1962). A role for rhizosphere CO₂ in rhizobial growth is supported by the fact that biotin, a cofactor required for using bicarbonate, limits alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) root colonization by Rhizobium meliloti (Streit et al., 1996).

Rhizobial bacteria form root nodules on legumes by altering genetic, biochemical, physiological, and morphological characteristics of root cells. Many of these changes occur in response to specific LCO signals produced by rhizobia in the presence of plant signal molecules (Dénarié and Cullimore, 1993; Spaink, 1995). Whereas data show that LCOs alter root flavonoid metabolism before nodules appear (Spaink et al., 1991; Savouré et al., 1994), the effects of LCOs and external rhizobia on primary C metabolism of root cells are poorly understood.

Given the rapidly changing metabolic requirements of plant cells at bacterial infection sites, it would not be surprising to find that plant cells respond to rhizobia by modifying the rate or patterns of primary C metabolism. It is possible, therefore, to determine whether rhizobial products increase plant cell respiration. To explore this hypothesis we searched for extracellular products of R. meliloti that enhance root respiration in alfalfa, their normal host plant.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Plant Growth and Inoculation

Rhizobium meliloti 1021 (Rm1021) (Meade et al., 1982) and R. meliloti TJ1A3 (Rm1021nodC::Tn5) (Jacobs et al., 1985) were grown to the early stationary phase in a defined minimal medium (Vincent, 1970). Agrobacterium tumefaciens 1D1609 (Palumbo, 1997) and Escherichia coli S17-1 (Simon et al., 1983) were grown in AB mineral medium with 0.5% (w/v) sodium succinate (Cangelosi et al., 1991) and Luria-Bertani medium (Sambrook et al., 1989), respectively. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation and washed three times with sterile water before roots were inoculated. UV irradiance for killing cells in some experiments was supplied as a 25-min treatment with a transilluminator (model T1202, Sigma). The absence of living cells in UV-killed cultures and sterile, noninoculated control treatments was verified by plating on tryptone yeast medium (Beringer, 1974) for R. meliloti or Luria-Bertani medium for A. tumefaciens and E. coli.

Experiments used 5 × 10⁷ CFU of bacteria per mL of plant nutrient solution unless otherwise noted. Bacteria were grown in their respective media, washed twice in sterile water, suspended in 1 mL of water, and added to the plant nutrient solution of alfalfa seedlings 3 d after germination, when roots were approximately 4 cm long. Sterile water (1 mL) was added to the sterile, noninoculated controls. Plants were harvested to measure root respiration at the times indicated in various experiments. At harvest, roots were excised, blotted briefly onto a paper towel, weighed, and enclosed in a 10-mL gas-tight test tube. Each replicate contained 1 g fresh weight of roots from about 200 plants; every experiment had three or four replicates and all experiments were repeated at least twice.

Analyses

Supernatant from the bacterial growth medium was collected by centrifugation and treated for 4 h with SM-2 Bio-Beads (30 g/L) (Bio-Rad). Compounds adsorbing to the Bio-Beads were eluted with methanol (10 mL/g) and dried under a vacuum. Samples for HPLC were dissolved in water, injected into a HPLC system (Waters) fitted with a Lichrosorb RP-18 column (250 × 4.6 mm) (Alltech Associates, Inc., Deerfield, IL), and eluted with water at 0.5 mL/min from 0 to 10 min. From 10 to 70 min a linear gradient increasing to 100% methanol was applied, and the analysis continued isocratically in 100% methanol for another 20 min. Eluting compounds were monitored with a photodiode array detector (model 996, Waters). Eluate was collected on a Cygnet fraction collector (ISCO, Inc., Lincoln, NE) every minute and dried by lyophilization.

Root-hair-curling capacity of various fractions was assayed by exposing root hairs of 3-d-old alfalfa seedlings grown on water agar. Test compounds were added in 100-µL drops to the root hair zone, and roots were monitored for 2 d with a light microscope at 100× magnification to detect morphological changes.

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Bacterial Enhancement of Root Respiration

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Enhancement of alfalfa root respiration by R. meliloti 1021. Bacteria were supplied to 3-d-old seedling roots at time 0, and 4-cm primary roots, including the tip, were excised at various times to measure respiration. Values are means ± se from three replicates maintained as a sterile, noninoculated control () or treated with Rm1021 (). fresh wt, Fresh weight.

Tests showed that CO₂ evolution by roots in this experimental system was linear for more than 1 h after excision (data not given). For that reason all assays reported here were conducted for 30 min immediately after excision. In several initial experiments in which both CO₂ evolution and O₂ uptake were measured, the CO₂ evolution increased in proportion to O₂ uptake (data not shown). Subsequent experiments measured only CO₂ evolution as an indicator of respiration.

Living bacteria were not required for the respiratory response because UV-killed cells also increased CO₂ evolution by the roots (Fig. 2). In fact, dead bacteria elicited significantly higher rates of root respiration than living cells in several, but not all, experiments. Under the conditions of these assays, an alfalfa pathogen, A. tumefaciens 1D1609, elicited a respiratory response very similar to that obtained with R. meliloti (Fig. 2). E. coli produced significant, but less marked, increases in CO₂ evolution by the roots.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Effects of various bacterial species on respiration of alfalfa roots. Roots of 3-d-old seedlings were exposed to living (UV) or dead (+UV) bacterial cells for 20 h, then 4-cm primary roots, including tips, were excised to measure respiration. Values are means + se from three replicates. fresh wt, Fresh weight.

Tests showed clearly that the respiratory enhancement by Rm1021 occurred in the root-hair region (Table I). In those experiments, bacteria were exposed to the intact plant and then roots were excised and divided into two sections, a 1-cm tip and a 3-cm subtending segment, which had differentiated root hairs by d 3. Although root tips had a much higher rate of CO₂ evolution, Rm1021 enhanced respiration only in the root-hair zone. Calculations made by summing CO₂ produced from the two segments indicated that cutting the roots did not increase respiration markedly. On the basis of these results, all subsequent assays were conducted by exposing bacteria or elicitor fractions to the intact plant and then measuring respiration only in the root segments bearing root hairs.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table I. R. meliloti effects on alfalfa root respiration Intact seedlings were exposed to bacteria for 24 h, then roots were cut into a 1-cm tip and a 3-cm root-hair-bearing region to measure CO2 production. Values in a column followed by different letters show significant (P  0.01) treatment effects. Roots exposed to dead Rm1021 cells remained sterile throughout the 24-h incubation period.

Treatments in which different numbers of Rm1021 cells were inoculated onto roots showed that at least 10⁷ CFU/mL were required for the maximum response (Fig. 3). This concentration of cells was visible to the naked eye. No common contaminants with especially powerful elicitor activity were detected. For example, in a few cases in which plant-growth containers were purposely left open to the air for 24 h, low numbers of air-borne bacteria were detected (e.g. 10⁴ CFU/mL), but root respiration was similar to the insignificant response produced by comparable numbers of Rm1021 cells (data not shown).

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effects of bacterial concentration on respiration of alfalfa roots. Roots of 3-d-old seedlings were exposed to living () or UV-killed () Rm1021 cells for 16 h, then root segments bearing root hairs were excised to measure respiration. Values are means ± se from three replicates. fresh wt, Fresh weight.

The well-characterized LCOs from R. meliloti, which function as Nod factors, were not required for the respiratory response studied in these experiments (Fig. 4). Mutant R. meliloti strain TJ1A3, which produces neither Nod-factor LCOs nor root nodules, was fully capable of eliciting increased respiration in alfalfa root segments bearing root hairs after 16 h of exposure to the intact seedling.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Promotion of alfalfa root respiration by a nonnodulating R. meliloti mutant. Roots of 3-d-old seedlings were exposed to wild-type Rm1021 or mutant Rm1021nodC::Tn5 cells for 16 h, then root segments bearing root hairs were excised to measure respiration. Values are means + se from three replicates. fresh wt, Fresh weight.

Respiration values measured in sterile root segments bearing root hairs differed somewhat in various experiments (compare Figs. 3 and 4). In all cases, however, rhizobial cells or elicitor molecules enhanced significantly the basal rate of respiration. In most instances, elicitors increased respiration 80 to 100% over the sterile, noninoculated control value. No attempt was made to relate these differences between experiments to possible changes in external or internal factors (e.g. root aeration or circadian rhythms).

Isolation of Bacterial Factors Enhancing Root Respiration

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

HPLC analysis of the lipophilic (i.e. Bio-Bead-binding) fraction from culture supernatant of Rm1021 cells indicated that four major peaks (A, B, C, and D) were present (Fig. 5). Tests proved that peak A had no effect on root respiration and did not curl root hairs (data not shown). Peak C was present only in culture filtrates of cells exposed to the known nod gene inducer luteolin (Fig. 5A), and it curled root hairs (data not shown). Those facts suggested that peak C contained Nod-factor LCOs, and no further experiments were done with that fraction. Material in peaks B and D did not curl alfalfa root hairs in tests using concentrations that were normalized through bacterial numbers to those present in the root hydroponic system (data not shown). Rm1021 cells grown without luteolin produced compounds in peaks B and D (Fig. 5B), and each liter of culture filtrate yielded approximately 5 mg of peak B and 1 mg of peak D. No HPLC peaks resembling peak B in terms of retention time and UV-visible spectrum were found in supernatant from either E. coli or A. tumefaciens. A minor peak with a UV-visible spectrum similar to peak D but a different retention time was present in supernatant from A. tumefaciens but not from E. coli.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. HPLC analyses of culture filtrates from R. meliloti 1021. Cells were grown with (A) or without (B) 3 mm luteolin, an inducer of genes required for production of Nod-factor LCOs contained in peak C. Compounds were eluted from a C18 column with an increasing concentration of methanol.

Very small amounts of the material in peaks B and D increased root respiration after intact seedlings had been treated for 16 h (Fig. 6). Peak-D material, for example, promoted respiration significantly (P  0.05) at 6.7 × 10¹⁰ g/L, and a 10-fold higher concentration produced a one-half-maximum response. The maximum increase in respiration elicited by peak D was consistently twice that produced by peak B after 16 h of treatment.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Effects of partially purified bacterial products on alfalfa root respiration. Material from peak B () and peak D () from Rm1021 culture medium (Fig. 5B) was supplied to roots of 3-d-old seedlings at the indicated concentrations. Respiration of root segments bearing root hairs was measured 16 h later. Values are means from two replicates, each containing roots of 200 plants. fresh wt, Fresh weight.

Experiments with these HPLC fractions showed that peaks B and D differed greatly in the time required for changes in root respiration to occur (Fig. 7). Peak B produced a rapid increase in respiration within 15 min, which declined over the next 20 h, whereas peak D required 8 h to elicit a maximum response, which was maintained until the end of the 20-h experiment.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. Short-term respiratory responses in alfalfa root segments. Material from peak B () or peak D () in Rm1021 culture medium (Fig. 5B) was applied at 106 g/L to intact seedling roots for the indicated period before respiration of root-hair-containing segments was measured.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Results from this study establish that two soil bacteria, R. meliloti and A. tumefaciens, increase respiration of alfalfa roots to a greater extent than E. coli. Although it has been shown previously that roots colonized by microorganisms evolve more CO₂ than sterile roots (Barber and Martin, 1976; Meharg and Killham, 1991), data presented here prove that bacterial respiration of root exudates is not required for that response. Both dead bacteria (Fig. 2) and partially purified rhizobial products (Figs. 6 and 7) enhanced alfalfa root respiration. Important characteristics of this bacterial elicitation of alfalfa root respiration were: (a) localization of the response in the region containing root hairs (Table I) and (b) the extreme sensitivity of the response (Fig. 6). If the active material in peak D has a molecular weight between 500 and 1000, then it produces a one-half-maximum increase in root respiration at a concentration of 10 to 20 pm. Clearly, two different types of factors are produced by rhizobia because one, HPLC peak B, elicits a rapid (15-min) increase in respiration, whereas the other, peak D, requires a longer (8-h) period for the plant response (Fig. 7). Material in peak D may be the more important of these two fractions because the time course of the plant response to the purified material is similar to that observed for intact cells (compare Figs. 7 and 1). In addition, a compound spectrally similar to peak D was produced by A. tumefaciens, a rhizosphere bacterium, but not by E. coli.

The elicitor molecules found in this study differ from known rhizobial LCOs involved in root nodule formation (Dénarié and Cullimore, 1993; Spaink, 1995). Unlike those Nod factors, molecules studied here are still produced by Rm1021nodC::Tn5, a nodC mutant (Fig. 4), and they are synthesized by Rm1021 cells grown in the absence of nod-gene-inducing compounds (Fig. 5B). Tests showed that, unlike Nod-factor LCOs, compounds present in peaks B and D (Fig. 5) did not curl alfalfa root hairs. Because rhizobia inoculated on plants in these experiments were grown in the absence of nod gene inducers, Nod factors were not present initially in the hydroponic rooting medium. Inducible, nod-gene-dependent compounds, such as Nod-factor LCOs that are present in HPLC peak C, may have been synthesized by Rm1021 cells during the 16- to 24-h incubation with intact roots, because alfalfa roots release nod-gene-inducing compounds under these experimental conditions (Maxwell et al., 1989). However, the magnitude of the response obtained with Rm1021nodC::Tn5 (Fig. 4) proves that any Nod factors produced by bacteria during exposure to these roots did not function additively with the respiratory elicitors studied here. Moreover, the capacity of UV-killed bacteria to induce the phenomena (Figs. 2 and 3) reinforces the concept that constitutive products, rather than plant-induced bacterial products, are fully capable of eliciting the respiratory response.

Cell wall fragments from pathogenic fungi can elicit increased respiration in plant cells. For example, parsley cell cultures treated with a Phytophthora megasperma elicitor fraction increased respiration within 20 min (Norman et al., 1994). Rhizobial material in HPLC peak B elicited a similar and rapid response (Fig. 7), and rhizobia defective in surface polysaccharides are known to induce a defense-like response (Niehaus et al., 1993). Although micromolar concentrations of Nod factor induce the accumulation of defense-related transcripts in alfalfa roots (Savouré et al., 1997), peak B is not a Nod factor because it was produced in the absence of luteolin and has no root-hair-curling activity. Respiratory increases produced by intact rhizobial cells (Fig. 1) and by material in the HPLC peak D (Fig. 7) required a much longer period to develop. This agrees with the concept that R. meliloti does not elicit the classic host defense response in alfalfa roots (McKhann and Hirsch, 1994). It is not known if material in peak B reached seedling roots in our experiments with intact bacterial cells, but peak D, which has a characteristic UV-visible spectrum, was found in HPLC analyses of the hydroponic root solution after 20 h of exposure to intact line Rm1021 cells (data not shown).

R. meliloti may derive several important benefits from increasing alfalfa root respiration. First, because bacteria use CO₂ for growth in reactions such as acetyl-CoA carboxylation (Burns et al., 1995) and pyruvate carboxylation (Dunn et al., 1996), rhizobia could use plant-derived CO₂ directly and thereby conserve other root-exudate compounds (e.g. amino acids) for direct incorporation into bacterial protoplasm (Phillips and Streit, 1996). Second, the quantity of other compounds in root exudates may increase in conjunction with the enhanced root respiration. Levels of certain flavonoids in alfalfa root exudate increase in the presence of R. meliloti cells (Dakora et al., 1993), and that response can be produced by Nod-factor LCOs in other legumes (Spaink et al., 1991; Savouré et al., 1997), possibly by depolarizing the root-hair cell membrane (Ehrhardt et al., 1992). Whether rhizobial elicitors in peaks B and D affect root exudation in addition to respiration is not known.

The mechanism underlying rhizobial elicitation of increased root respiration remains to be defined. Because CO₂ evolution increased in proportion to O₂ uptake in these experiments, root respiration rather than decarboxylation was the source of the CO₂. The response measured here in root-hair-bearing segments may herald changes in primary C metabolism that develop later in root nodules (Vance and Heichel, 1991; Werner, 1992), but any such relationship remains to be demonstrated. Plants treated with Rm1021 required 48 h before root-hair deformation occurred (data not shown), so energy derived from increased respiration after 24 h may have contributed to that process. The source of additional respiratory substrate cannot be determined from these experiments, but several different processes may operate. Short-term responses (<60 min), such as the effect of material in peak B, may involve oxidation of sugar from known flavonoid glycosides (Tiller et al., 1994), which presumably are present in cortical cell vacuoles. Longer-term responses (4-8 h) could involve changes in photosynthate partitioning or possibly even an increase in photosynthesis. As the elicitor molecules in peaks B and D are identified, they will be important reagents for defining the poorly understood transduction systems affecting root respiration.

	FOOTNOTES

   Received August 18, 1997; accepted November 12, 1997.

	ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming units. LCO(s), lipo-chitin oligosaccharide(s). Nod, nodulation.

	LITERATURE CITED

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Barber DA, Martin JK (1976) The release of organic substances by cereal roots into soil. New Phytol 76: 69-80 [CrossRef]

Beringer JE (1974) R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84: 188-198 [Medline]

Burns BP, Hazell SL, Mendz GL (1995) Acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity in Helicobacter pylori and the requirement of increased CO₂ for growth. Microbiology 141: 3113-3118 [Abstract]

Cangelosi GA, Best EA, Marinetti G, Nester EW (1991) Genetic analysis of Agrobacterium. Methods Enzymol 204: 384-397 [ISI][Medline]

Cheng WX, Coleman DC, Carroll CR, Hoffman CA (1993) In situ measurement of root respiration and soluble C-concentrations in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 25: 1189-1196 [CrossRef]

Dakora FD, Joseph CM, Phillips DA (1993) Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) root exudates contain isoflavonoids in the presence of Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol 101: 819-824 [Abstract]

DeJong TM, Phillips DA (1981) Nitrogen stress and apparent photosynthesis in symbiotically grown Pisum sativum L. Plant Physiol 68: 309-313 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dénarié J, Cullimore J (1993) Lipo-oligosaccharide nodulation factors: a new class of signaling molecules mediating recognition and morphogenesis. Cell 74: 951-954 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Dunn MF, Encarnación S, Araíza G, Vargas MC, Dávalos A, Peralta H, Mora Y, Mora J (1996) Pyruvate carboxylase from Rhizobium etli: mutant characterization, nucleotide sequence, and physiological role. J Bacteriol 178: 5960-5970 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ehrhardt DW, Atkinson EM, Long SR (1992) Depolarization of alfalfa root hair membrane potential by Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors. Science 256: 998-1000 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jacobs TW, Egelhoff TT, Long SR (1985) Physical and genetic map of a Rhizobium meliloti nodulation gene region and nucleotide sequence of nodC. J Bacteriol 162: 469-476 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lowe RH, Evans HJ (1962) Carbon dioxide requirement for growth of legume nodule bacteria. Soil Sci 94: 351-356

Maxwell CA, Hartwig UA, Joseph CM, Phillips DA (1989) A chalcone and two related flavonoids released from alfalfa roots induce nod genes of Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol 91: 842-847 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

McKhann HI, Hirsch AM (1994) Does Rhizobium avoid the host response? In JL Dangl, eds, Bacterial Pathogenesis of Plants and Animals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 139-162

Meade HM, Long SR, Ruvkun GB, Brown SE, Ausubel FM (1982) Physical and genetic characterization of symbiotic and auxotrophic mutants of Rhizobium meliloti induced by transposon Tn5 mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 149: 114-122 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meharg AA, Killham K (1991) A novel method of quantifying root exudation in the presence of soil microflora. Plant Soil 133: 111-116 [CrossRef]

Niehaus K, Kapp D, Pühler A (1993) Plant defense and delayed infection of alfalfa pseudonodules induced by an exopolysaccharide (EPS-I)-deficient Rhizobium meliloti mutant. Planta 190: 415-425 [ISI]

Norman EG, Walton AB, Turpin DH (1994) Immediate activation of respiration in Petroselinum crispum L. in response to the Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea elicitor. Plant Physiol 106: 1541-1546 [Abstract]

Palumbo JD (1997) An isoflavonoid-inducible efflux pump operon in Agrobacterium tumefaciens involved in alfalfa root colonization. PhD thesis. University of California, Davis

Phillips DA, Streit WR (1996) Legume signals to rhizobial symbionts: a new approach for defining rhizosphere colonization. In G Stacey, NT Keen, eds, Plant-Microbe Interactions. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 236-271

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

Savouré A, Magyar Z, Pierre M, Brown S, Schultze M, Dudits D, Kondorosi A, Kondorosi E (1994) Activation of the cell cycle machinery and the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway by active Rhizobium meliloti Nod signal molecules in Medicago microcallus suspensions. EMBO J 13: 1093-1102 [ISI][Medline]

Savouré A, Sallaud C, El-Turk J, Zuanazzi J, Ratet P, Schultze M, Kondorosi A, Esnault R, Kondorosi E (1997) Distinct response of Medicago suspension cultures and roots to Nod factors and chitin oligomers in the elicitation of defense-related responses. Plant J 11: 277-287 [CrossRef]

Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A (1983) A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1: 784-791 [CrossRef]

Spaink HP (1995) The molecular basis of infection and nodulation by rhizobia: the ins and outs of sympathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 33: 345-368 [CrossRef][ISI]

Spaink HP, Sheeley DM, van Brussel AAN, Glushka J, York WS, Tak T, Geiger O, Kennedy EP, Reinhold VN, Lugtenberg BJJ (1991) A novel highly unsaturated fatty acid moiety of lipo-oligosaccharide signals determines host specificity of Rhizobium. Nature 354: 125-130 [CrossRef][Medline]

Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

Streit WR, Joseph CM, Phillips DA (1996) Biotin and other water-soluble vitamins are key growth factors for alfalfa rhizosphere colonization by Rhizobium meliloti 1021. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 5: 330-338

Swinnen J (1994) Evaluation of the use of a model rhizodeposition technique to separate root and microbial respiration in soil. Plant Soil 165: 89-101

Tiller SA, Parry AD, Edwards R (1994) Changes in the accumulation of flavonoid and isoflavonoid conjugates associated with plant age and nodulation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Physiol Plant 91: 27-36 [CrossRef]

Vance CP, Heichel GH (1991) Carbon in N₂ fixation: limitation or exquisite adaptation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 373-392 [CrossRef][ISI]

Vincent JM (1970) A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule Bacteria. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK

Werner D (1992) Physiology of nitrogen-fixing legume nodules: compartments and functions. In G Stacey, RH Burris, HJ Evans, eds, Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 399-431

Copyright Clearance Center:   0032-0889/98/116/0777/07
 
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists