Plant Physiol. (1998) 116: 879-890

Characterization of SKT1, an Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel from Potato, by Heterologous Expression in Insect Cells

Sabine Zimmermann¹, Ina Talke¹, Thomas Ehrhardt, Gabriele Nast², and Bernd Müller-Röber^*

Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 25, Haus 20, D-14476 Golm/Potsdam, Germany

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

A cDNA encoding a novel, inwardly rectifying K⁺ (K⁺_in) channel protein, SKT1, was cloned from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). SKT1 is related to members of the AKT family of K⁺_in channels previously identified in Arabidopsis thaliana and potato. Skt1 mRNA is most strongly expressed in leaf epidermal fragments and in roots. In electrophysiological, whole-cell, patch-clamp measurements performed on baculovirus-infected insect (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells, SKT1 was identified as a K⁺_in channel that activates with slow kinetics by hyperpolarizing voltage pulses to more negative potentials than 60 mV. The pharmacological inhibitor Cs⁺, when applied externally, inhibited SKT1-mediated K⁺_in currents half-maximally with an inhibitor concentration (IC₅₀) of 105 µm. An almost identical high Cs⁺ sensitivity (IC₅₀ = 90 µm) was found for the potato guard-cell K⁺_in channel KST1 after expression in insect cells. SKT1 currents were reversibly activated by a shift in external pH from 6.6 to 5.5, which indicates a physiological role for pH-dependent regulation of AKT-type K⁺_in channels. Comparative studies revealed generally higher current amplitudes for KST1-expressing cells than for SKT1-expressing insect cells, which correlated with a higher targeting efficiency of the KST1 protein to the insect cell's plasma membrane, as demonstrated by fusions to green fluorescence protein.

	INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

K⁺ channels and transport systems play multiple roles in higher-plant processes, including opening and closing of stomatal pores, leaf movements, and ion uptake in roots (Hedrich and Becker, 1994; Schroeder et al., 1994; Coté, 1995). Different approaches led to the molecular cloning of plant K⁺_in channel cDNAs from Arabidopsis thaliana (kat1: Anderson et al., 1992; kat2: Butt et al., 1997; akt1: Sentenac et al., 1992; akt2 and akt3: Cao et al., 1995; Ketchum and Slayman, 1996), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) (kst1: Müller-Röber et al., 1995; skt2 and skt3: Ehrhardt et al., 1997), and other plant species (Hoth et al., 1997). Considering structural domains, these plant K⁺_in channels can be divided into the KAT and the AKT subfamilies (Schroeder et al., 1994). Recently, the first plant member of a novel class of "two-pore" K⁺ channels has been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana (Czempinski et al., 1997).

Functional characterization of newly cloned channel proteins requires their expression in heterologous expression systems. Xenopus oocytes are widely used to characterize channel proteins and other transporters from animals (Sigel, 1990) and, more recently, also from plants. In addition to metabolite transport proteins (e.g. Boorer et al., 1994) and water channels (e.g. Maurel et al., 1993; Yamada et al., 1995), functional expression of Arabidopsis KAT1 (Schachtman et al., 1992; Véry et al., 1994, 1995; Hedrich et al., 1995; Hoshi, 1995) and potato KST1 (Müller-Röber et al., 1995; Hoth et al., 1997) in oocytes has been reported. However, in some cases expression of plant channel proteins in oocytes can be difficult (e.g. AKT1) or may be dependent on the injected cRNA. Although AKT2 and AKT3 are obviously encoded by the same gene, only Ketchum and Slayman (1996) could demonstrate K⁺_in currents in Xenopus oocytes after injection of the akt3 cRNA. On the other hand, Cao et al. (1995) were not able to show any activity of AKT2 in either Xenopus oocytes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or baculovirus-infected insect (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells. Although the reason for this discrepancy is not known at present, slight differences in the 5 end of the constructs used for the experiments could be responsible. Furthermore, the expression strength and biophysical properties of KAT1 were dependent on polyadenylation of the injected cRNA (Cao et al., 1995). Arabidopsis AKT1 was never reported to be functionally expressed in Xenopus oocytes, although it was active in S. cerevisiae cells (Bertl et al., 1997).

Baculovirus-infected insect cells represent an alternative system for the expression and characterization of channel proteins. Insect cells have been used for the expression of a wide variety of proteins (King and Possee, 1992), including several proteins from higher plants (see Bustos et al., 1988; Vernet et al., 1990; Nagai et al., 1992; Macdonald et al., 1994). More recently, K⁺_in channels from Arabidopsis (AKT1: Gaymard et al., 1996; KAT1: Marten et al., 1996) and potato (KST1: Ehrhardt et al., 1997) were functionally expressed and electrophysiologically studied using this heterologous expression system.

We report here the molecular cloning, functional expression, and electrophysiological characterization of SKT1, another K⁺_in channel from potato. Initial experiments in our laboratory indicated that SKT1 was not functionally expressed in oocytes. The use of baculovirus-infected insect cells enabled us to analyze and compare the potato K⁺_in channels SKT1 and KST1 in the same expression system, such as pH dependence and inhibition of K⁺ currents by Cs⁺. Furthermore, the targeting of the potato channels within the insect cells was studied by protein fusion to GFP, allowing us to visualize differences of K⁺_in channel distribution.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Enzymes and Chemicals

Bacteria and Plants

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv Désirée) was obtained through Saatzucht Fritz Lange (GmbH, Bad Schwartau, Germany). Plants for epidermal fragment preparation were grown in soil in a greenhouse as described by Landschütze et al. (1995).

Isolation of the skt1 cDNA

RNA Extraction and Northern-Blot Analysis

Insect Cells and Virus Infection

Constructs Used for Expression in Insect Cells

SDS-PAGE

Electrophysiology

Unless otherwise indicated, figures are shown for one representative cell, and statistics are given as means ± sd. For comparisons statistical Student's t tests were performed using SigmaPlot (Jandel Scientific, Carle Madera, CA) and P values were calculated (P representing the probability that two means are not significantly different).

Microscopy

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Cloning of the skt1 cDNA from Potato

View larger version (68K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. (On facing page.)Sequence and structure of SKT1. S1 to S6, Transmembrane segments; H5, pore region; cNMP, putative cyclic nucleotide-binding site; A1 to A6, ankyrin-like repeats; KHA, C-terminal homology domain. A, Nucleotide sequence of the skt1 cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence of the SKT1 protein. Transmembrane segments, H5 region, cNMP, and the interaction domain KHA are underlined. The ankyrin-like repeats are boxed and respective conserved amino acids (Bennett, 1992) are in boldface. The conserved His residue His-267 involved in pH sensing (Hoth et al., 1997) is marked by an asterisk. B, Structural model of the SKT1 protein.

The deduced SKT1 protein contains several structural domains that are common to plant K⁺_in channels (see Fig. 1, A and B): (a) six putative transmembrane domains (S1-S6), as deduced from hydropathy blots (not shown); (b) a K⁺-selective pore-forming domain, H5; (c) a putative cyclic nucleotide-binding domain; (d) six ankyrin repeat sequences that are also present in AKT1, AKT2/3, SKT2, and SKT3, but not in KAT1 or KST1 (these domains have been proposed to bind to cytoskeletal proteins [compare with Cao et al., 1995]); and (e) a C-terminal interaction domain present in all cloned plant K⁺_in channels (Ehrhardt et al., 1997). Table I shows identity scores between the potato protein and other plant K⁺_in channel proteins previously published. SKT1 is most closely related to Arabidopsis AKT1, with 73.1% identical (85.6% similar) amino acids.

Functional Expression in Baculovirus-Infected Insect Cells Reveals SKT1 to Be a Second K⁺_in Channel from Potato

To test for protein expression total membrane fractions were prepared from insect cells at d 1 to 6 after infection and separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 2). Already 2 d after infection a protein with a molecular weight corresponding to that of SKT1 appeared (Fig. 2B). The amount of this protein did not change significantly during d 2 to 6 after infection, indicating that insect cells have a protein-synthesizing capacity that allows a maximal level of expression of a channel protein within the first 2 d. Similar observations were made for KST1 (see Fig. 2A).

View larger version (77K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. SDS-polyacrylamide gel showing the presence of KST1 (A) and SKT1 (B) protein in membrane preparations of vir-KST1- and vir-SKT1-infected insect cells. Membrane proteins were isolated from insect cells 1 to 6 d after infection and after electrophoresis visualized by silver staining (typical examples from two independent experiments). The novel proteins KST1 (79 kD) and SKT1 (92 kD), appearing at d 2 after infection, are indicated by arrows.

Insect cells that were infected by the recombinant baculovirus vir-SKT1 were assayed for K⁺ inward currents 2 d after infection in the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp method. In standard solutions ([K⁺_ext] = 30 mm, [K⁺_in] = 150 mm), hyperpolarizing pulses elicited slowly activating negative currents (Fig. 3A). The activation kinetics could be fitted by a multiexponential function. Half-activation times, representing the time in which half-maximal amplitudes of the "quasi"-steady-state currents were reached, were voltage dependent for each individual cell and were found on average to be 389 ± 116 ms at 100 mV, and 259 ± 86 ms at 140 mV (n = 10), respectively (significance of voltage-dependent activation was tested; P = 0.01, paired Student's t test P < 1 × 10⁵). Inactivation of SKT1-mediated currents was not observed under the applied conditions. The current-voltage relation (Fig. 3B) of the mean current at the end of the applied voltage pulses as shown in Figure 3A of vir-SKT1-infected Sf9 cells (n = 10) was compared with that of control currents of uninfected cells (n = 10). Uninfected Sf9 cells as well as cells expressing another protein (i.e. the "two-pore" channel KCO1; Czempinski et al., 1997) displayed only small currents at highly hyperpolarized potentials. SKT1 activated at membrane potentials more negative than the E_a at around 60 mV.

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Electrophysiological characteristics of SKT1 expressed in insect cells. The cells were measured in the whole-cell mode 2 d after infection. A, Hyperpolarization-activated SKT1 currents for one representative vir-SKT1-infected Sf9 cell. Voltage pulses (1.5 s) were applied every 10 s from +60 to 140 mV in 20-mV increments from a holding potential of 30 mV. B, Current-voltage relation of the mean quasi-steady-state currents at the end of the 1.5-s voltage pulses derived from control insect cells (n = 10; not infected) and Sf9 cells expressing SKT1 (n = 10). The Ea was approximately 60 mV. C, SKT1 tail currents elicited by double-voltage pulses. Inward currents were activated at 140 mV (1100 ms) from a holding potential of 40 mV. Current transients in response to a second voltage pulse (900 ms) from 150 to +60 mV in 30-mV increments were recorded. D, Erev of SKT1 at different external K+ concentrations (; n = 4-13). Semilogarithmically displayed data points were linearly fitted. The measured Erev values are in good accordance with the theoretical Nernst potentials for K+ (). E, SKT1 mean current-voltage relations in different external K+ concentrations: 10 mm (; n = 4), 30 mm (; n = 10), and 100 mm (; n = 4) K-gluconate. Error bars for 30 mm are left out for clearness (see B). Note that the Ea did not change significantly.

Standard solutions contained the impermeable anion gluconate as the counterion for K⁺, thus suggesting that K⁺ is the main carrier of the observed currents elicited by hyperpolarizing pulses. Also, the E_rev determined in double-pulse experiments (47 ± 7 mV; n = 13) was in good accordance with the Nernst potential for K⁺ (42 mV; Fig. 3C). Furthermore, we analyzed SKT1-mediated currents in different external K⁺ concentrations. The E_rev from tail-current experiments for [K⁺_ext] of 5 to 150 mm followed approximately the calculated value of the Nernst potential for K⁺ (Fig. 3D). The increase of [K⁺_ext] by a factor of 10 changed the E_rev by 58 mV, as expected from the Nernst equation, indicating permeability for K⁺. The E_a of SKT1 was not significantly dependent on different external K⁺ concentrations (Fig. 3E). Replacing gluconate in the external bath solution with chloride had no influence on the voltage-dependent SKT1 current (n = 5; data not shown), demonstrating the cation permeability of SKT1. Further measurements of SKT1 currents in bath solutions containing monovalent cations replacing K⁺ demonstrated that SKT1 is a highly selective K⁺ channel. Chloride salts of K⁺ (n = 5), NH₄ (n = 6), Na⁺ (n = 4), and Li⁺ (n = 3) were tested. Currents were strongly reduced in the K⁺-free bath solutions and relative permeabilities were determined: K⁺ (1) > NH₄⁺ (0.02)  Na⁺, Li⁺ (<0.01).

To test whether divalent cations, i.e. Mg²⁺ or Ca²⁺, might be responsible for the rectification as described for animal K⁺ inward rectifiers (Matsuda, 1991), we performed experiments with bath and pipette solutions depleted of Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺. As in standard conditions (see Fig. 3, A and B), only hyperpolarizing potentials activated the inwardly rectifying SKT1 currents (n = 5; data not shown), arguing for intrinsic mechanisms of voltage sensing and regulation.

Cytosolic compounds, like nucleotides, are known to influence the activity of ion channels. Because our standard pipette solutions contained ATP, we also checked SKT1 activity in the absence of internal ATP. ATP-free pipette solutions caused a slow decrease of hyperpolarization-activated SKT1 currents within 5 to 10 min (n = 3; data not shown), as was observed for KST1 expressed in oocytes (Müller-Röber et al., 1995) or in insect cells (see below). The long lag time until observation of significant effects may be the result of the time required to equilibrate the cytosol with the ATP-free pipette solution. In addition, high-affinity ATP-binding or phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events might also be considered.

Taken together, these results confirm that SKT1 could be functionally expressed in the plasma membrane of baculovirus-infected insect cells and that it is indeed the second K⁺_in channel cloned from potato.

External pH and Cs⁺ Affect SKT1 Channel Activity

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Dependence of SKT1 currents on external pH. A, Decrease of current amplitude for a representative cell at 140 mV by alkalinization of the external pH from 5.5 to 6.6. B, Current-voltage relationships for the cell shown in A at pH 5.5 (), pH 6.6 (), and finally pH 5.5 (), demonstrating reversibility of the pH regulation.

To characterize SKT1 pharmacologically, we tested Cs⁺ as an inhibitor of plant K⁺ channels (Tester, 1990). Application of Cs⁺ in the bath solution caused a decrease of the K⁺ inward current within a few minutes (Fig. 5, A and B). Inhibition was determined at 130 mV at different external Cs⁺ concentrations and the dose-response curve (see Fig. 6B) revealed an IC₅₀ of 105 µm. Tail-current experiments (n = 4) revealed that the inhibition was dependent on applied potentials (Fig. 5C), suggesting a voltage-dependent block. We found an inhibition of tail-current amplitudes at 90 mV of 51 ± 17%, but at 120 mV the inhibition was 75 ± 10% (inhibition significantly different; P = 0.06, paired Student's t test P = 0.02). The blocking Cs⁺ ion might be more attracted into the channel pore at hyperpolarized potentials but more easily liberated at depolarizing potentials.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Cs+ inhibition of SKT1-mediated K+in currents. A, Control currents of a representative vir-SKT1-infected insect cell (for voltage pulses, see Fig. 3A legend). B, Inhibition of SKT1 current by external addition of 100 µm Cs+. C, Voltage-dependent inhibition of SKT1 tail currents of another cell by 100 µm Cs+ (for voltage pulses, see Fig. 3C legend).

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Characteristics of KST1 expressed in insect cells in comparison with SKT1. A, Hyperpolarization-activated KST1 currents shown for one representative vir-KST1-infected Sf21 cell. Voltage pulses (1.5 s) were applied every 10 s from +60 to 112 mV. B, Dose-response curve of SKT1 and KST1 current inhibition by externally applied Cs+. Percentage of inhibition was determined for quasi-steady-state currents at 130 mV and fitted by a logistic function. , SKT1; , KST1 (n = 3-7). Note that concentrations for half-maximal inhibition were nearly identical for SKT1 (IC50 = 105 µm) and KST1 (IC50 = 90 µm). C, Voltage-dependent mean currents in control cells (; n = 10), vir-SKT1-infected cells (; n = 10), and vir-KST1-infected cells (; n = 13). Note the marked difference in absolute current amplitudes in SKT1- and KST1-expressing cells (significance tested for 100 mV; P < 0.009).

Our data concerning external modulation of SKT1 activity demonstrate a physiologically interesting pH dependence as well as a voltage-dependent Cs⁺ sensitivity that might be of interest in obtaining a pharmacological fingerprint of the different members of plant K⁺_in channels (see ``Discussion'').

SKT1 and KST1, Two K⁺_in Channels from Potato: Similarities and Differences

The pH dependence of KST1 was initially studied in experiments on oocytes (Müller-Röber et al., 1995) and further confirmed by mutational analysis of conserved His's (Hoth et al., 1997). We found that KST1 currents were also reversibly regulated by external pH modulation in insect cells, as shown for SKT1 (see Fig. 4). Alkalinization of the pH from 5.5 to 6.6 decreased KST1 currents by more than 50% (n = 3). Experiments without cytosolic ATP demonstrated a slow decrease of KST1 currents in insect cells, confirming results obtained on oocytes on the single-channel level (Müller-Röber et al., 1995). As in SKT1-expressing insect cells, we observed a rundown of KST1 activity within 5 to 10 min with the ATP-free pipette solution, resulting in about a 50% current decrease after 10 min of the whole-cell configuration (n = 4). Thus, SKT1 and KST1 are both regulated by modulation of external pH and are dependent on the presence of internal ATP.

As previously observed in oocytes, application of 0.5 and 1 mm Cs⁺ to KST1-expressing insect cells caused strong inhibition of the inward current, and the voltage-dependent block was pronounced in tail-current experiments (data not shown). In contrast to pharmacological results obtained on oocytes (600 µm in oocytes; Müller-Röber et al., 1995), however, we determined a much lower IC₅₀ of 90 µm for Cs⁺ in the baculovirus/insect cell system. In this system, the Cs⁺ sensitivities of SKT1 and KST1 turned out to be almost identical (Fig. 6B).

So far, both channels from potato were shown to be inward rectifiers with very similar characteristics. Nevertheless, slight differences in E_a and activation kinetics were detected (see above). Much more obvious was a discrepancy in the amplitudes of SKT1- or KST1-mediated currents, as shown in the current-voltage relation (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, almost all of the vir-KST1-infected cells exhibited K⁺_in currents, whereas K⁺_in currents were detectable in only 30 to 50% of vir-SKT1-infected cells.

Use of GFP to Visualize Targeting of SKT1 and KST1 in Insect Cells

View larger version (100K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. SKT1 and KST1 expression in insect cells visualized by GFP. Microscopic images representing >90% of insect cells expressing GFP or GFP fusion proteins as seen under normal light and UV light in at least eight independent infections (bar = 3.5 µm). Note that insect cells infected with recombinant virus show distinct signs of infection, such as a swollen cell body and a clearly visible swollen nucleus. The size of the cells is variable (8-15 µm) and does not depend on the virus used for infection. A and B, GFP. The protein is equally distributed in the cytosol, as can be seen by a diffuse overall fluorescence. C and D, GFP-KST1 fusion. The protein is clearly localized in cellular membranes. In the plasma membrane, GFP-KST1 appears as fluorescent patches most likely consisting of several clustered channel proteins (compare with Ehrhardt et al., 1997). E and F, GFP-SKT1 fusion protein. The channel protein can be seen only in internal cellular membranes, especially around the nucleus. No fluorescence can be detected in the plasma membrane.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 8. Functional activity of GFP-SKT1. A, Current response of a GFP-SKT1-expressing insect cell. For voltage pulse protocol, see legend to Figure 3A. B, Current-voltage relation of the mean quasi-steady-state currents (n = 3) at the end of the 1.5-s voltage pulses. The Ea of approximately 60 mV is indicated.

These results suggest that the targeting of SKT1 might be affected in vir-SKT1-infected insect cells, preventing the insertion of detectable amounts of fluorescently labeled channel protein, although K⁺ currents were resolved with the more sensitive patch-clamp recordings. Taken together, our observations might explain the observed differences in current amplitudes and occurrence (see Fig. 6C).

The skt1 Gene Is Expressed in Roots and Epidermal Fragments of Potato Plants

View larger version (51K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 9. mRNA expression of skt1 in potato tissues. EF, Epidermal fragments; L, whole leaves; and R, roots. The size of the transcript is indicated at the right of the figure.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

The molecular and electrophysiological characterization of K⁺ channels from various plant species, including crops, is required to characterize the full range of K⁺ transport mechanisms in relation to turgor regulation, nutrient uptake, and nutrient transport, as well as to elucidate the structure-function relationship of these channel proteins. Functional expression of plant K⁺ channels in heterologous systems has been demonstrated mainly for K⁺ channels from the genetic model plant A. thaliana (e.g. Anderson et al., 1992; Sentenac et al., 1992; Ketchum and Slayman, 1996; Czempinski et al., 1997). To our knowledge, the only reported exception is the K⁺_in channel KST1 from potato, which was shown by in situ hybridization to be expressed in leaf guard cells (Müller-Röber et al., 1995). Here we describe the cloning and functional characterization of another K⁺_in channel from potato, SKT1, which on the amino acid level is most similar to Arabidopsis AKT1. Initial attempts to express SKT1 functionally in Xenopus oocytes were not successful, a phenomenon that has also been observed for AKT1. Surprisingly, however, coinjection of skt1 and akt1 cRNAs into Xenopus oocytes resulted in strong K⁺_in currents upon membrane hyperpolarization, indicating that SKT1 and AKT1 subunits were able to associate and form electrophysiologically active K⁺_in channels in this heterologous expression system (Dreyer et al., 1997). We therefore evaluated whether the baculovirus/insect cell system would be suitable to determine the properties of a channel solely composed of SKT1 polypeptides. Insect cells have been used in many cases in the animal field to study channel properties; however, they have only more recently been used for expression of the plant K⁺_in channel proteins KAT1 (Marten et al., 1996), AKT1 (Gaymard et al., 1996), and KST1 (Ehrhardt et al., 1997). Furthermore, modified KST1 proteins, e.g. those harboring N-terminal extensions (GFP or polyhistidine tags [Ehrhardt et al., 1997; T. Ehrhardt, S. Zimmermann, and B. Müller-Röber, unpublished data]), could be functionally expressed in insect cells. Here we demonstrated that another channel protein, SKT1 from potato, can be studied electrophysiologically in these cells.

The expression of plant ion channels in baculovirus-infected insect cells makes it possible to directly compare channels of the KAT family with AKT-type channels. We showed that SKT1 represents a K⁺_in-selective channel that is activated with slow kinetics by hyperpolarizing voltage pulses, indicating that overall properties of SKT1 were similar to those described for KST1 expressed in oocytes (Müller-Röber et al., 1995) and in insect cells (this report; see also Ehrhardt et al., 1997).

Plant growth and activity of K⁺ channels are extremely sensitive to extracellular Cs⁺ (e.g. Tester, 1990; Sheahan et al., 1993). Previously, KAT1 and KST1 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes were investigated with respect to block by Cs⁺ ions (Hedrich et al., 1995; Müller-Röber et al., 1995; Véry et al., 1995). Here we showed that both potato channels, SKT1 and KST1, exhibited a similar voltage-dependent inhibition by Cs⁺ (around 100 µm at 130 mV) when expressed in insect cells. In contrast, much higher concentrations of Cs⁺ were needed to achieve half-maximal inhibition of KST1-mediated currents in Xenopus oocytes (IC₅₀ = 600 µm at 180 mV; Müller-Röber et al., 1995). Similarly, expression of Arabidopsis KAT1 in oocytes required 335 µm Cs⁺ (at 180 mV; Becker et al., 1996) or 500 µm Cs⁺ (at 135 mV; Ichida and Schroeder, 1996) for half-maximal inhibition.

Recently, Dreyer et al. (1997) found a strongly increased sensitivity toward Cs⁺ (IC₅₀ = 40 µm at 150 mV) of K⁺_in currents in Xenopus oocytes upon coinjection of kst1 and akt1 cRNA, and an even higher Cs⁺ sensitivity, with an IC₅₀ of 15 µm, was observed upon coinjection of skt1 and akt1 cRNAs. For AKT1 expressed in yeast a Cs⁺ block with an IC₅₀ of approximately 20 µm was found recently by Bertl et al. (1997). The reasons for the differences in observed Cs⁺ sensitivities in the various systems are not clear at present. For oocytes, Véry et al. (1994) proposed that the level of expression of KAT1 influences the apparent inhibition by Cs⁺. In these experiments injection of lower amounts of kat1 cRNA resulted in smaller K⁺ currents that were more strongly inhibited by Cs⁺. Alternatively, one can speculate that in vivo properties of K⁺_in channels of the KAT family are modified by subunits of the AKT family. The recent observation that electrically active K⁺_in channels can form by oligomerization of members of the two families supports such a possibility (compare with Dreyer et al., 1997). It is interesting that IC₅₀ values of 40 and 64 µm (determined at 200 mV) were obtained for K⁺_in currents in isolated guard cell protoplasts from Vicia faba and potato, respectively (compare with Hedrich and Dietrich, 1996). Our results obtained here for SKT1 and KST1 expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells indicate a Cs⁺ sensitivity that, at least for KST1, is close to the value determined in vivo in guard-cell protoplasts.

Another aspect of particular interest is the observation of pH-dependent regulation of plant K⁺_in channels. We have recently shown that KST1 is activated by acidic pH values of the external medium (Müller-Röber et al., 1995), and that an extracellular His residue, which is highly conserved in all plant K⁺_in channel proteins molecularly identified to date, contributes to pH sensitivity (Hoth et al., 1997). Similarly, KAT1, after expression in oocytes, has been shown to be activated by a shift in external pH from 6.5 to 5.0 (Véry et al., 1995). In guard cells, where KST1 (Müller-Röber et al., 1995) and KAT1 (Nakamura et al., 1995) are expressed, initiation of stomatal opening involves an activation of the plasma membrane proton pump (H⁺-ATPase), leading to membrane hyperpolarization and acidification of the extracellular space (Shimazaki et al., 1986), thereby activating K⁺_in channels (Blatt and Thiel, 1993). In this work we could demonstrate the dependence of current activity on external pH also for SKT1, thereby extending this effect to members of the AKT family. Although the exact cell type in which the skt1 gene is expressed is not known at present, we have shown here that skt1 mRNA is detectable in roots (and in leaf epidermal fragments). Similarly, the akt1 gene has been shown to be expressed in roots of A. thaliana (Basset et al., 1995; Lagarde et al., 1996), consistent with a role of AKT1, and also of SKT1, in K⁺ uptake from the soil. The observation that SKT1 is reversibly activated by a shift to more acidic pH values indicates that also in the cellular environment of the plant tissue (e.g. in roots) this channel might be activated by a combination of membrane hyperpolarization and extracellular acidification. Previous physiological experiments have indeed indicated that uptake of K⁺ is driven by an electrogenic extrusion of H⁺, e.g. in barley roots (Behl and Raschke, 1987).

Although SKT1 and KST1 exhibited similar functional properties in insect cells, we found an important difference in targeting efficiency to the insect cell's plasma membrane, visualized by fusions to GFP. An appreciable proportion of the GFP signal was detected in the plasma membrane upon fusion of GFP to KST1 (see Fig. 7D; see also Ehrhardt et al., 1997). In contrast, we never detected GFP signals in the plasma membrane when the reporter protein was fused to SKT1, even when sensitive confocal microscopy was used, although high amounts of GFP-SKT1 fusion proteins localized to intracellular membranes (see Fig. 7F). These data indicate very inefficient targeting of the GFP-SKT1 protein to the plasma membrane of insect cells. A similar result was obtained by Gaymard et al. (1996) for AKT1 in immunogold studies. At present, we cannot explain the differences in plasma membrane targeting. However, one might speculate that insufficient targeting of AKT-like channels to the plasma membrane is responsible for unsuccessful attempts to express these proteins in Xenopus oocytes.

The presence of multiple K⁺_in channels in higher plants raises questions about their cellular distribution and functional roles. More physiological evidence is needed to determine whether functionally similar ion channels contribute to tissue- and cell-type-specific ion fluxes in planta or whether they are coexpressed and possibly cooperate in plant cell membranes.

	FOOTNOTES

   Received August 4, 1997; accepted December 3, 1997.
   The accession number for the nucleotide sequence of skt1 described in this article is X86021.

	ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviations: E_a, activation potential. E_rev, reversal potential. GFP, green fluorescence protein. IC₅₀, inhibitor concentration for 50% inhibition. [K⁺_ext], external K⁺ concentration. [K⁺_in], internal K⁺ concentration. K⁺_in channel, inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Katrin Czempinski and Dr. Gunnar Plesch for critical comments on the manuscript.

	LITERATURE  CITED

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Amasino RM (1986) Acceleration of nucleic acid hybridisation rate by polyethylene glycol. Anal Biochem 152: 304-307 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Anderson JA, Huprikar SS, Kochian LV, Lucas WJ, Gaber RF (1992) Functional expression of a probable Arabidopsis thaliana potassium channel in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3736-3740 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Basset M, Conjelo G, Lepetit M, Fourcroy P, Sentenac H (1995) Organization and expression of the gene coding for the potassium transport system AKT1 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 29: 947-958 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Becker D, Dreyer I, Hoth S, Reid JD, Busch H, Lehnen M, Palme K, Hedrich R (1996) Changes in voltage activation, Cs⁺ sensitivity, and ion permeability in H5 mutants of the plant K⁺ channel KAT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 8123-8128 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Behl R, Raschke K (1987) Close coupling between extrusion of H⁺ and K⁺ by barley roots. Planta 172: 531-538

Bennett V (1992) Ankyrins: adaptors between diverse plasma membrane proteins and the cytoplasm. J Biol Chem 267: 8703-8706 [Free Full Text]

Bertl A, Reid JD, Sentenac H, Slayman CL (1997) Functional comparison of plant inward-rectifier channels expressed in yeast. J Exp Bot 48: 405-413

Blatt MR, Thiel G (1993) Hormonal control of ion channel gating. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 543-567 [CrossRef][Web of Science]

Boorer KJ, Loo DDF, Wright EM (1994) Steady-state and presteady-state kinetics of the H⁺-hexose cotransporter (STP1) from Arabidopsis thaliana expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 269: 20417-20424 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bustos MM, Luckow VA, Griffing LR, Summers MD, Hall TC (1988) Expression, glycosylation and secretion of phaseolin in a baculovirus system. Plant Mol Biol 10: 475-488

Butt AD, Blatt MR, Ainsworth CC (1997) Expression, evolution and genomic complexity of potassium ion channel genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol 150: 652-660

Cao Y, Ward JM, Kelly WB, Ichida AM, Gaber RF, Anderson JA, Uozumi N, Schroeder JI, Crawford NM (1995) Multiple genes, tissue specificity, and expression-dependent modulation contribute to the functional diversity of potassium channels in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 109: 1093-1106 [Abstract]

Coté GG (1995) Signal transduction in leaf movement. Plant Physiol 109: 729-734 [Web of Science][Medline]

Czempinski K, Zimmermann S, Ehrhardt T, Müller-Röber B (1997) New structure and function in plant K⁺ channels: KCO1, an outward rectifier with a steep Ca²⁺-dependency. EMBO J 16: 2565-2575 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 387-395

Dreyer I, Antunes S, Hoshi T, Müller-Röber B, Palme K, Pongs O, Reintanz B, Hedrich R (1997) Plant K⁺ channel -subunits assemble indiscriminately. Biophys J 72: 2143-2150 [Web of Science][Medline]

Ehrhardt T, Zimmermann S, Müller-Röber B (1997) Association of plant K⁺_in channels is mediated by conserved C-termini and does not affect channel assembly. FEBS Lett 409: 166-170 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gaymard F, Cerutti M, Horeau C, Lemaillet G, Urbach S, Ravallec M, Devauchelle G, Sentenac H, Thibaud JB (1996) The baculovirus/insect cell system as an alternative to Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 271: 22863-22870 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391: 228-232

Hedrich R, Becker D (1994) Green circuits: the potential of plant specific ion channels. Plant Mol Biol 26: 1637-1650 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hedrich R, Dietrich P (1996) Plant K⁺ channels: similarity and diversity. Bot Acta 109: 94-101 [Web of Science]

Hedrich R, Moran O, Conti F, Busch H, Becker D, Gambale F, Dreyer I, Küch A, Neuwinger K, Palme K (1995) Inward rectifier potassium channels in plants differ from their animal counterparts in response to voltage and channel modulators. Eur Biophys J 24: 107-115 [Web of Science][Medline]

Hoshi T (1995) Regulation of voltage dependence of the KAT1 channel by intracellular factors. J Gen Physiol 105: 309-328 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoth S, Dreyer I, Dietrich P, Becker D, Müller-Röber B, Hedrich R (1997) Molecular basis of plant-specific acid activation of K⁺ uptake channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4806-4810 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ichida AM, Schroeder JI (1996) Increased resistance to extracellular cation block by mutation of the pore domain of the Arabidopsis inward-rectifying K⁺ channel KAT1. J Membr Biol 151: 53-62 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ketchum KA, Slayman CW (1996) Isolation of an ion channel gene from Arabidopsis thaliana using the H5 signature sequence from voltage-dependent K⁺ channels. FEBS Lett 378: 19-26 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

King LA, Possee RD (1992) The Baculovirus Expression System: A Laboratory Guide. Chapman and Hall, London

Kopka J, Provart NJ, Müller-Röber B (1997) Potato guard cells respond to drying soil by a complex change in the expression of genes related to carbon metabolism and turgor regulation. Plant J 11: 871-882 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lagarde D, Basset M, Lepetit M, Conejero G, Gaymard F, Astruc S, Grignon C (1996) Tissue-specific expression of Arabidopsis AKT1 gene is consistent with a role in K⁺ nutrition. Plant J 9: 195-203 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Landschütze V, Müller-Röber B, Willmitzer L (1995) Mitochondrial citrate synthase from potato: predominant expression in mature leaves and young flower buds. Planta 196: 756-764 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1987) Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem 163: 21-26 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Luckow VA, Summers MD (1988) Trends in the development of baculovirus expression vectors. Bio/Technology 6: 47-55

Macdonald H, Henderson J, Napier RM, Venis MA, Hawes C, Lazarus CM (1994) Authentic processing and targeting of active maize auxin-binding protein in the baculovirus expression system. Plant Physiol 105: 1049-1057 [Abstract]

Marten I, Gaymard F, Lemaillet G, Thibaud JB, Sentenac H, Hedrich R (1996) Functional expression of the plant K⁺ channel KAT1 in insect cells. FEBS Lett 380: 229-232 [Medline]

Matsuda H (1991) Magnesium gating of the inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel. Annu Rev Physiol 53: 289-298 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maurel C, Reizer J, Schroeder JI, Chrispeels MJ (1993) The vacuolar membrane protein gamma-tip creates water specific channels in Xenopus oocytes. EMBO J 12: 2241-2247 [Web of Science][Medline]

Müller-Röber B, Ellenberg J, Provart N, Willmitzer L, Busch H, Becker D, Dietrich P, Hoth S, Hedrich R (1995) Cloning and electrophysiological analysis of KST1, an inward rectifying K⁺ channel expressed in potato guard cells. EMBO J 14: 2409-2416 [Web of Science][Medline]

Nagai A, Suzuki K, Ward E, Moyer M, Hashimoto M, Mano J, Ohta D, Scheidegger A (1992) Overexpression of plant histidinol dehydrogenase using a baculovirus vector system. Arch Biochem Biophys 295: 235-239 [Medline]

Nakamura RL, McKendree WL Jr, Hirsch RE, Sedbrook JC, Gaber RF, Sussman MR (1995) Expression of an Arabidopsis potassium channel gene in guard cells. Plant Physiol 109: 371-374 [Abstract]

Neher E (1992) Correction for liquid junction potentials in patch-clamp experiments. Methods Enzymol 207: 123-131 [Web of Science][Medline]

Robinson RA, Stokes RH (1965) Electrolyte Solutions. Butterworths, London

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

Schachtman DP, Schroeder JI, Lucas WJ, Anderson JA, Gaber RF (1992) Expression of an inward-rectifying potassium channel by the Arabidopsis KAT1 cDNA. Science 258: 1654-1658 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schroeder JI, Ward JM, Gassmann W (1994) Perspective on the physiology and structure of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in higher plants: biophysical implications for K⁺ uptake. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 23: 441-471 [Web of Science][Medline]

Sentenac H, Bonneaud N, Minet M, Lacroute F, Salmon JM, Gaymard F, Grignon C (1992) Cloning and expression in yeast of a plant potassium ion transport system. Science 256: 663-665 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sheahan JJ, Ribeiro-Neto L, Sussman MR (1993) Plant J 3: 647-656 [CrossRef]

Shimazaki K, Iino M, Zeiger E (1986) Nature 319: 324-326 [CrossRef]

Sigel E (1990) Use of Xenopus oocytes for the functional expression of plasma membrane proteins. J Membr Biol 117: 201-221 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tester M (1990) Plant ion channels: whole-cell and single-channel studies. New Phytol 114: 305-340 [CrossRef]

Vernet T, Tssier DC, Richardson C, Laliberté F, Khouri HE, Bell AW, Storer AC, Thomas DY (1990) Secretion of functional papain precursor from insect cells. J Biol Chem 265: 16661-16666 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Véry AA, Bosseux C, Gaymard F, Sentenac H, Thibaud JB (1994) Level of expression in Xenopus oocytes affects some characteristics of a plant inward-rectifying voltage-gated K⁺ channel. Pflugers Arch 428: 422-424 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Véry AA, Gaymard F, Bosseux C, Sentenac H, Thibaud JB (1995) Expression of a cloned plant K⁺ channel in Xenopus oocytes: analysis of macroscopic currents. Plant J 7: 321-332 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yamada S, Katsuhara M, Kelly WB, Michalowski CB, Bohnert HJ (1995) A family of transcripts encoding water channel proteins: tissue-specific expression in the common ice plant. Plant Cell 7: 1129-1142 [Abstract]

Copyright Clearance Center:   0032-0889/98/116/0879/12
 
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists