Plant Physiol. (1998) 117: 9-17

Aluminum-Resistant Arabidopsis Mutants That Exhibit Altered Patterns of Aluminum Accumulation and Organic Acid Release from Roots¹

Paul B. Larsen, Jörg Degenhardt, Chin-Yin Tai², Laura M. Stenzler, Stephen H. Howell, and Leon V. Kochian^*

United States Plant, Soil, and Nutrition Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Station, Tower Road, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 (P.B.L., J.D., L.V.K.); and Boyce Thompson Institute, Tower Road, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 (C.-Y.T., L.M.S., S.H.H.)

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Al-resistant (alr) mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana were isolated and characterized to gain a better understanding of the genetic and physiological mechanisms of Al resistance. alr mutants were identified on the basis of enhanced root growth in the presence of levels of Al that strongly inhibited root growth in wild-type seedlings. Genetic analysis of the alr mutants showed that Al resistance was semidominant, and chromosome mapping of the mutants with microsatellite and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers indicated that the mutants mapped to two sites in the Arabidopsis genome: one locus on chromosome 1 (alr-108, alr-128, alr-131, and alr-139) and another on chromosome 4 (alr-104). Al accumulation in roots of mutant seedlings was studied by staining with the fluorescent Al-indicator dye morin and quantified via inductively coupled argon plasma mass spectrometry. It was found that the alr mutants accumulated lower levels of Al in the root tips compared with wild type. The possibility that the mutants released Al-chelating organic acids was examined. The mutants that mapped together on chromosome 1 released greater amounts of citrate or malate (as well as pyruvate) compared with wild type, suggesting that Al exclusion from roots of these alr mutants results from enhanced organic acid exudation. Roots of alr-104, on the other hand, did not exhibit increased release of malate or citrate, but did alkalinize the rhizosphere to a greater extent than wild-type roots. A detailed examination of Al resistance in this mutant is described in an accompanying paper (J. Degenhardt, P.B. Larsen, S.H. Howell, L.V. Kochian [1998] Plant Physiol 117: 19-27).

	INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Al toxicity is a global problem that limits crop productivity on acidic soils. Al is the most abundant metal in the earth's crust, and in acidic soils (pH < 5.5) the phytotoxic species Al³⁺ is solubilized to levels that inhibit root growth and crop yield (Kochian, 1995). Large areas of the world contain acidic soils (>30% of the arable land), so Al toxicity is a very important worldwide agricultural problem (Von Uexkull and Mutert, 1995). Despite the agronomic importance of this problem, little is known about fundamental mechanisms of Al toxicity and resistance. It has been well documented that many plant species exhibit significant genetic variability in their ability to resist Al toxicity (Delhaize and Ryan, 1995; Kochian, 1995, and refs. therein). Although it is clear that certain plant genotypes have evolved mechanisms that confer Al resistance, the cellular and molecular basis for Al resistance is still poorly understood.

There are two strategies that plants can use to deal with Al toxicity: exclusion from the root apex or development of the ability to tolerate Al once it enters the plant symplasm (Delhaize and Ryan, 1995; Kochian, 1995). Because of the complex interactions between Al and the plant, it is very likely that there are a number of different mechanisms that plants use to confer Al resistance. This is supported by genetic studies of Al resistance, which have shown it to be a dominant, multigenic trait controlled by one or a few major genes and several minor genes (Lafever and Campbell, 1978; Aniol, 1990; Carver and Ownby, 1995).

Recent experimental evidence supports an Al-resistance mechanism that results in the exclusion of Al from the root apex via the release of Al-binding ligands such as organic acids and/or phosphate. When these ligands are released into the rhizosphere, they can effectively chelate Al³⁺ and prevent its entry into the root. In several species, including snapbean, maize, and wheat, increased Al resistance is correlated with Al-dependent organic acid (citrate or malate) release (Miyasaka et al., 1991; Delhaize et al., 1993b; Basu et al., 1994; Pellet et al., 1995). In near-isogenic lines of wheat, increased Al resistance is dependent on Al-inducible release of malate into the rhizosphere (Delhaize et al., 1993a, 1993b). Further examination has shown that in a large number of wheat genotypes, Al resistance is strongly correlated with the level of Al-induced malate that is released from root tips (Ryan et al., 1995b).

A similar mechanism has also been reported in maize; an Al-resistant cultivar was shown to release citrate in response to Al (Pellet et al., 1995). More recently, it was shown that constitutive phosphate release might operate in conjunction with Al-induced organic release to confer a greater degree of Al resistance in certain wheat genotypes (Pellet et al., 1996). Another mechanism of Al exclusion that is frequently proposed is a root-mediated elevation in the pH of the rhizosphere adjacent to the root apex (Kochian, 1995). Because the solubility of Al³⁺ is pH dependent, increases in rhizosphere pH would reduce the activity of Al³⁺ in the rhizosphere, thus decreasing Al entry into the root. However, no direct evidence for this Al-exclusion mechanism has been found to date.

The primary effect of Al toxicity is a rapid inhibition of root growth, which appears to result from complex interactions between Al and the root apex (Ryan et al., 1993). Because this response is rapid (e.g. significant inhibition within 1 h in wheat), it is likely that cell elongation, not cell division, is initially inhibited. However, in the long term, Al-dependent root-growth inhibition is probably dependent on blockage of both cell division and elongation (Kochian, 1995). The molecular and biochemical basis of Al toxicity is not well understood, but it is likely that a number of processes that are associated with both the root apoplast and the symplast are targeted by Al. In Arabidopsis thaliana, mutations affecting at least eight unique loci confer increased Al sensitivity, indicating that Al sensitivity is a complex trait in plants (Larsen et al., 1996).

We were interested in determining the molecular and physiological basis of Al resistance in higher plants, so we identified and characterized Arabidopsis mutants with altered responses to Al. We previously identified and characterized a number of Al-sensitive Arabidopsis mutants, and through analysis of these mutants, are attempting to identify genes encoding targets of Al toxicity (Larsen et al., 1996, 1997). In the present study, we have conducted research aimed at identifying loci that are responsible for Al resistance via screening for Arabidopsis mutants with increased resistance to Al. By isolation and analysis of such mutants, we hope to identify and characterize genes responsible for Al resistance and to gain a better understanding of the genetic and physiological mechanisms resulting in resistance.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Isolation of Mutants

Screening was carried out in 100- × 25-mm Petri dishes containing 85 mL of nutrient medium (pH 4.2) plus 0.125% gellan gum (Gell-Gro, ICN) (for composition of nutrient medium, see Larsen et al., 1996). Al was introduced into the gel medium by equilibration for 2 d with a soak solution consisting of a modified nutrient solution, pH 4.2, and 1.5 mm AlCl₃ (Larsen et al., 1996).

Mutagenized seeds were sterilized and cold stratified (4°C) for 2 d in the dark to synchronize germination. Two-hundred-fifty M₂ generation seeds suspended in 0.15% agarose were planted around the periphery of each Petri dish. After incubation for 7 d in a growth chamber (20°C with a day/night cycle of 16/8 h), putative Al-resistant mutant seedlings were identified based on enhanced root growth in the Al-containing environment, and then rescued onto plant nutrient medium without Al and with Suc added (Lincoln et al., 1990). After 2 weeks, putative mutants were transferred to soil and grown in a light room at 20°C, 40% RH, and a light intensity of 50 µE m² s¹. Putative alr mutants were selfed, and M₃ progeny were rescreened using the same screening method. Each mutant was backcrossed four times into the Columbia background and the resulting BC₄ generation was used for subsequent genetic and physiological analyses.

Genetic Analysis

The chromosome location of each alr mutation was mapped using microsatellite markers (Bell and Ecker, 1994). To generate mapping populations, alr mutants (Col-0 ecotype) were crossed with wild type (Wassilewskija, Ws-0 ecotype). Homozygous wild-type (not resistant to Al) F₂ progeny were identified on gelled-nutrient medium equilibrated with 1.5 mm AlCl₃. Progeny were confirmed as being homozygous by rescreening F₃ families using the same method. Map distances were analyzed using the Mapmaker II program (Lander et al., 1987).

To identify more closely linked markers on chromosome 1, RAPD analysis was performed by comparing pools of homozygous resistant and homozygous wild-type F₂ plants generated from a mapping cross between alr-128 and Ws-0 (Reitter et al., 1992).

Root-Growth Measurements in Solution Culture

Determination of Al Accumulation in Roots

After 4 d of growth, the growth solution was replaced with a new medium containing 25 µm AlCl₃, and seedlings were incubated for up to 3 h. Seedlings were then rinsed in nutrient medium for 5 min. For root tissue in which cell wall-bound Al was desorbed, samples were washed in 0.5 mm citrate, pH 4.2, for 30 min at 4°C (Zhang and Taylor, 1990). Root tips were harvested by cutting the terminal portion with a razor blade against the polycarbonate support rod. Collected roots were dried in an oven at 90°C overnight, and dry weights were determined using a microgram balance (model UMT2, Mettler, Greifensee, Switzerland).

Dried tissue samples were ashed in 20 µL of hot, concentrated nitric acid. Samples were resuspended in 10 mL of 1.0% nitric acid and analyzed using an inductively coupled argon plasma mass spectrometer (model 5000, Perkin-Elmer/Sciex). Samples were compared with AlCl₃ standards.

All plasticware used for growth and collection of samples was soaked in 20% HCl before use to minimize Al contamination.

Visualization of Callose in Roots

Measurement of Root Organic Acid Content and Exudation

Solutions were frozen, lyophilized, and resuspended in 600 µL of deionized water. Samples were analyzed on an ion chromatography system (model DX-300, Dionex) fitted with a 4-mm AG-11 guard column and a 4-mm AG-11 ion-exchange analytical column. Samples were separated using an eluent gradient of NaOH in 17% high-purity methanol, and anions were detected by measurement of electrical conductivity. Identification of organic acids in the exudates was achieved by comparison of retention times with those of organic acid standards. Quantification was based on standard curves generated from peak integration of standards.

Roots used for measurement of internal organic acid concentrations were grown in the absence of Al as previously described. Roots from 100 5-d-old seedlings were rinsed in deionized water, harvested, weighed, and ground in 1 mL of 60% ethanol. Cellular debris were pelleted, the supernatant collected, and the pellet resuspended in 95% ethanol. The debris were repelleted and the supernatant was collected and combined with the previous supernatant. The samples were then dried under vacuum and resuspended in 600 µL of deionized water. Concentrations of organic acids in roots were measured as previously described for measurement of organic acids in root exudates.

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Isolation of Mutants with Increased Al Resistance

Approximately 2500 M₂ seedlings were screened from each of 40 mutagenized pools, resulting in the isolation of 57 putative mutants from approximately 1 × 10⁵ seedlings. Rescreening of M₃ seedlings confirmed that 6 mutants from different pools were Al resistant (Table I). An "in-gel" AlCl₃ dose-response curve for the alr mutants demonstrated increased Al resistance at concentrations from 0.25 to 1.5 mm AlCl₃ (data not shown). Root growth in the wild type was inhibited in gel medium equilibrated with 0.75 mm or higher concentrations of AlCl₃. In contrast, root growth in alr-128 was inhibited only when grown in gelled-nutrient medium equilibrated with AlCl₃ concentrations  1.25 mm. It should be noted that root growth in the absence of Al was similar for wild type and all of the alr mutants.

Genetic Analysis of alr Mutants

Because Al resistance was semidominant, it was not possible to sort the alr mutants unambiguously by complementation analysis. To determine whether the alr mutants represented unique genetic loci, the mutations were mapped on the Arabidopsis genome (Table I). The Ws-0 ecotype was chosen as a mapping partner because it was shown previously that roots of Ws-0 seedlings had Al sensitivity similar to that of Col-0 (Larsen et al., 1996). Homozygous wild-type (non-Al-resistant) F₂ progeny were used to construct a mapping population. The genotypes of the F₂ progeny were confirmed by the analysis of F₃ families. alr-104 mapped near the cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence marker B9-1.8 on chromosome 4 (Table I) (Konieczny and Ausubel, 1993). Four other alr mutants (alr-108, alr-128, alr-131, and alr-139) mapped on chromosome 1 near the microsatellite marker nga280 (Table I). Mapping analysis was not carried out for alr-142 because it has a weak phenotype and is difficult to follow in crosses.

RAPD mapping was performed to identify an anonymous marker that was more closely linked to alr-128 than nga280. Pools of DNA from homozygous Al-resistant and wild-type F₂ plants generated from the cross described above were compared by RAPD analysis. A polymorphic band derived from primer OPW-10 appeared in the resistant pools but not in the wild-type pools and was determined to represent a site tightly linked to the alr-128 locus. Inheritance of the OPW-10 polymorphism was examined for each of the alr mutants that mapped near alr-128 (Table I). The results indicate that these alr mutants map closely together on chromosome 1 and either represent a cluster of genes affecting Al resistance or are alleles of the same gene.

Growth of alr Mutants in Al-Containing Solution Culture

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Growth of Arabidopsis roots in hydroponic solution culture containing Al. Al-dependent root growth inhibition was compared for wild type (wt), alr-104, and alr-128. Seedlings were grown for 4 d in nutrient solution with no added AlCl3, pH 4.2, and then transferred to nutrient solution containing varying concentrations of AlCl3 and grown for an additional 2 d. Relative root growth increment in the presence of Al was expressed as (RL d 6  RL d 4)/(RL d 4) × 100, where RL = root length. Error bars represent the se (n = 50).

Root growth of wild-type seedlings was inhibited at concentrations of AlCl₃ as low as 10 µm, and declined sharply at 20 µm. In contrast, at concentrations between 10 and 40 µm AlCl₃, root growth in both alr-104 and alr-128 decreased gradually, with maximal differences in Al resistance between wild type and the alr mutants occurring within this concentration range. In nutrient solution containing 50 µm AlCl₃, root growth of both wild type and the alr mutants was completely inhibited. A concentration of 50 µm AlCl₃ in our nutrient solution represents an Al³⁺ activity of 3.9 µm, as determined by the Geochem-PC program (Parker et al., 1987).

Growth of alr Mutants in La-Containing Solution Culture

Callose Accumulation

View larger version (60K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Accumulation of Al and callose in roots after exposure to AlCl3. A, Patterns of Al-dependent callose accumulation were examined for roots of wild type (wt), alr-104, and alr-128. Roots of 4-d-old seedlings were exposed to nutrient solution containing 75 µm AlCl3 for 24 h, except for the first panel, in which no Al was added (Al). Seedlings were then fixed, stained with 0.1% aniline blue, pH 9.0, and observed using epifluorescence microscopy. The top row represents bright-field images of the treated roots, and the bottom row are fluorescence images indicating callose accumulation. B, Patterns of Al accumulation by roots of wild type, alr-104, and alr-128 were observed using the Al-indicator dye morin. Five-day-old seedlings grown in nutrient solution without Al were exposed to nutrient solution containing 25 µm AlCl3 for 1 h, except for the first panel, in which no Al was added (Al). Roots were then stained with 100 µm morin, a stain that fluoresces when complexed with Al.

Patterns of Al Accumulation

Roots of intact wild-type, alr-104, and alr-128 seedlings were exposed to a nutrient solution containing 25 µm AlCl₃ for either 0 or 3 h, after which time roots were rinsed for 5 min in nutrient solution without Al. Root tips, representing the terminal 1 to 2 cm of the roots, were analyzed for Al content using ICP-MS. As shown in Table II, analysis of 0-h samples revealed a minimal amount of background Al. After 3 h of Al exposure, wild type accumulated 48% more Al than alr-104 and 61% more than alr-128.

Al bound to the root cell wall was desorbed with an ice-cold 0.5 mm citrate solution following the methods of Zhang and Taylor (1990) to determine if the differences in root Al accumulation between wild type and the alr mutants was attributable to symplastic or apoplastic Al. It should be noted that it is likely that this desorption regime does not remove all of the cell wall Al (see Rengel, 1996), but primarily removes Al in the free space and loosely bound to the cell wall. Under these conditions, after desorption the Al left in the root would be either tightly bound to the cell wall or sequestered in the symplasm. Citrate desorption reduced the amount of Al that accumulated in wild-type roots, but had no effect on Al concentrations in roots of alr-104 and alr-128 (Table II), suggesting that Al accumulated in alr roots represents Al that cannot easily be desorbed from the root cell wall. Therefore, the fraction of Al desorbed from wild-type roots may represent a free pool of apoplastic Al that was not present in the alr roots.

Wild-type seedlings and the alr mutants were further examined for their capability to exclude Al by using the Al-indicator dye morin. The use of morin, which fluoresces when complexed with Al, allows for better spatial resolution of Al accumulation in the root apex, the primary site of Al toxicity. Seedlings were exposed to 25 µm AlCl₃ for 1 h, washed, and then stained with morin. As shown in Figure 2B, morin staining revealed that there were significant differences between wild type and the alr mutants in terms of Al accumulation within the root apex. Roots not exposed to Al exhibited a very slight fluorescence. In contrast, intense morin fluorescence was observed in wild-type root tips exposed to 25 µm AlCl₃. Morin fluorescence in Al-treated root tips of both alr-104 and alr-128 was reduced compared with wild type, with alr-128 exhibiting the lowest levels of fluorescence after the 1-h exposure to Al. This was especially true right at the root apex of alr-128, where staining intensity approximated that seen in untreated wild-type roots.

Organic Acid Release

Seedlings of wild type and each alr mutant were grown in sterile culture for 5 d in nutrient solution and subsequently transferred to a sterile solution consisting of 100 µm CaCl₂, pH 4.2, containing either 0 or 2.7 µm AlCl₃, and grown for an additional 24 h. Subsequently, the root-bathing solution was collected and analyzed for organic acids. These root-exudate experiments were carried out in simple salt (CaCl₂) solutions to eliminate interference from the high levels of inorganic anions in the nutrient solution (i.e. NO₃, SO₄², and PO₄³) during HPLC analysis. It was determined with the Geochem-PC program that the addition of 2.7 µm AlCl₃ to the low-salt solution (100 µm CaCl₂) would yield the same Al³⁺ activity as 25 µm AlCl₃ in the full nutrient solution.

When roots of wild-type seedlings were incubated in the root-bathing solution without added Al, the profile of organic acid release during the 24-h time period was complex (Fig. 3). Citrate was the predominant organic acid released by wild-type roots, along with smaller amounts of pyruvate, succinate, and malate. Exposure to 2.7 µm Al³⁺, which inhibited root growth in wild-type seedlings but not in the alr mutants, did not significantly change the profile or magnitude of organic acid release by wild-type roots.

View larger version (63K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Organic acid exudation by roots of wild-type (wt) seedlings and alr mutants in the presence or absence of Al. One-hundred seedlings of wild type (Col-0), alr-104, alr-108, alr-128, and alr-131 were grown for 5 d in nutrient solution and then transferred to a solution consisting of 100 µm CaCl2, pH 4.2, containing either 0 or 2.7 µm Al3+ for 24 h. Root exudates were collected, free Cl was removed, and samples were analyzed using an ion-chromatography system. Each panel represents the total picomoles of organic acid released by 100 roots during the 24-h period in the absence (Al) or presence (+Al) of added Al. Error bars represent the se (n = 6).

The profiles of released organic acids indicate that the group of mutants mapping on chromosome 1 (alr-108, alr-128, and alr-131) are phenotypically similar but not identical (Fig. 3). These mutants constitutively exhibited an increased rate of malate and/or citrate exudation. alr-108, alr-128, and alr-139 each exhibited stimulated malate release, particularly alr-128, which had a 2-fold increase in malate exudation compared with wild type. In the absence of Al, each mutant exhibited a slight to moderate increase in citrate release. This was most evident for alr-131, a mutant that did not exhibit enhanced malate exudation. Increased rates of citrate exudation were not sustained when the mutants were exposed to Al. Each of the four chromosome 1 mutants exhibited a 2- to 3-fold stimulation in pyruvate exudation (which does not effectively chelate Al). alr-104, the lone mutation on chromosome 4, did not exhibit an enhanced citrate or malate exudation compared with wild type (Fig. 3). Thus, the mechanism of Al resistance in alr-104 does not appear to involve stimulated organic acid exudation.

Internal Organic Acid Concentrations

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Al Resistance in Arabidopsis

We have identified at least two loci in Arabidopsis that confer Al resistance, which does not appear to be as genetically complex in Arabidopsis as Al sensitivity, for which eight different loci have been found (Larsen et al., 1996). All eight Al-sensitive loci have not been mapped yet, but so far we have no evidence that the mutations affecting Al sensitivity and resistance involve common genes. Certainly, the Al-sensitive mutations may affect the same mechanisms affected by alr mutations, but they probably would do so in different ways. It is likely that some of the Al-sensitive mutations are just as important in understanding Al resistance as the alr mutations.

To varying degrees, both alr-104 and alr-128 appear to exclude Al from the root tip. This was shown both by staining root tips with Al-indicator dyes and by quantifying Al accumulation with ICP-MS. Differences in Al accumulation between wild type and the alr mutants appeared to be much greater when analyzed by morin staining than by ICP-MS. This is probably a result of technical limitations attributable to the difficulty of isolating only root tips for analysis via ICP-MS. In both wheat and maize, Al exclusion and organic acid release were specifically localized to the root apex, and there were no differences in Al accumulation for mature root regions between Al-resistant and Al-sensitive genotypes (see Rincon and Gonzales, 1992). We also found little difference in Al accumulation between the alr mutants and wild-type seedlings in the mature root regions based on results from morin staining (data not shown). The smallest root tip segments we could obtain by harvesting root tips en masse were about 5 mm in length. Because the root apex in Arabidopsis is only about 1 mm long, it would be expected that the differences in Al concentration between root tips of the alr mutants and wild type as determined by ICP-MS analysis are an underestimation of the actual differences within the root apex.

In addition to the fact that root growth in alr-104 and alr-128 is resistant to Al, each accumulated less callose, which is a good indicator of Al toxicity in roots (Wissemeir et al., 1987; Schreiner et al., 1994; Zhang et al., 1994). After Al exposure, callose accumulation in the roots of both alr mutants was reduced compared with wild type. Unlike Al-sensitive Arabidopsis mutants, in which no correlation was found between Al sensitivity and Al-dependent callose accumulation (Larsen et al., 1996), a reduction in callose accumulation in the alr mutants appears to be a good marker of increased Al resistance.

Organic Acid Exudation in Relation to Al Resistance

Both malate and citrate have high affinities for Al³⁺ (Hue et al., 1986; Delhaize et al., 1993b). Recent studies have shown that Al-resistant, near-isogenic lines of wheat bearing the Alt1 gene exhibit a severalfold stimulation in the rate of root malate exudation compared with the Al-sensitive line. The function of Alt1, which is responsible for differential Al resistance, has not been ascertained. When Ryan et al. (1995b) compared a number of different wheat cultivars exhibiting varying degrees of Al resistance, a good correlation was found between Al-inducible malate release and Al resistance. A similar mechanism has been described in maize, in which Al exclusion from the root tip in Al-tolerant lines is correlated with an Al-inducible exudation of citrate localized to the root apex (Pellet et al., 1995).

Malate (and Cl) efflux across the plasma membrane coupled to K⁺ efflux has been studied extensively in relation to stomatal closure. Work by several groups has shown that anion channels are responsible for the observed release of Cl and malate during stomatal closing (Linder and Raschke, 1992; Hedrich and Becker; 1994; Hedrich et al., 1994; Schroeder, 1995). Similar anion channels have been studied in the plasma membrane of epidermal cells of Arabidopsis hypocotyls and are assumed to exist throughout the plant, including the root (Thomine et al., 1995). Therefore, it is presumed that organic acid release from root cells is mediated by an outward-rectifying, plasma membrane-localized anion channel.

Because plant anion channels can be regulated by a number of external and internal factors (Ebel and Cosio, 1994; Schroeder, 1995; Thomine et al., 1995; Ward et al., 1995), it is possible that at least in wheat and maize, Al may play a role in anion-channel gating (Delhaize et al., 1993b; Pellet et al., 1995, 1996; Ryan et al., 1995a, 1995b). Support for this possibility comes from the results of a recent study by Ryan et al. (1997), which were based on an electrophysiological (patch-clamp) analysis of protoplasts isolated from the root apex of the Al-resistant wheat line used to initially demonstrate Al-inducible malate release. They presented evidence for an Al-activated anion channel in the plasma membrane of these protoplasts that could play a key role in the Al-exclusion response previously studied in intact roots. The physiological characteristics of organic acid release observed in the Arabidopsis alr mutants may be somewhat different than that seen in Al-resistant lines of maize and wheat. Unlike maize and wheat, the altered pattern of organic acid release observed, for example, in alr-128 does not appear to be Al induced, suggesting that the mutation responsible for this phenotype does not result in a change in the Al-dependent regulation of the transporter.

However, it is possible that the increased organic acid release of alr-128 results from a change in the Al-independent gating of an organic acid transporter, thus allowing constitutive increases in citrate, malate, and pyruvate release. The anion channel involved in guard-cell closure has been reported to have low ion selectivity, with the capability to transport a broad range of anions out of the guard cell (Schmidt and Schroeder, 1994; Schroeder, 1995). The low selectivity of such a transporter involved in anion efflux suggests that organic acids in roots may be transported via a similar system.

The observed increase in the rate of organic acid exudation by roots of alr-128 could also represent some change in the compartmentalization of organic acids. Citrate, malate, and pyruvate are all organic acid species that accumulate in the cytoplasm after export of citrate from mitochondria. It is possible that the increased release of organic acids out of the root may result from an alteration in citrate export from mitochondria. Based on the data shown in Figure 3, which indicate that in alr-128 citrate efflux is increased slightly, whereas malate efflux is doubled and pyruvate release is tripled, it can be speculated that a mutation that leads to either enhanced transport of citrate from the mitochondria or reduced citrate transport into the vacuole results in the progressive increase in the cytoplasm of derivatives of cytoplasmic citrate. Inherent in this speculative model is the concept that increased levels of cytoplasmic organic acids lead to increased transport of these species out of the cell. Support for this comes from the recent work by de la Fuente et al. (1997), in which transgenic tobacco and papaya seedlings expressing bacterial citrate synthase resulted in increased citrate accumulation in the root cytoplasm, enhanced citrate exudation from the root, and a significant increase in Al resistance.

Apparently, Al resistance in alr-104, a locus that maps to a different chromosomal location than alr-128, arises from a different mechanism than enhanced organic acid release. Degenhardt et al. (1998) describe a mechanism by which roots of alr-104 exhibit an Al-inducible increase in rhizosphere pH, resulting in a decrease in the activity of the rhizotoxic Al³⁺ species in the rhizosphere.

This study represents the first report to our knowledge of Arabidopsis mutants selected for increased Al resistance in roots. Isolation of such mutants will allow for further characterization of Al-resistance mechanisms and may provide an opportunity to identify other Al-resistance mechanisms that have not been previously described. In addition, such mutants provide the opportunity to isolate genes responsible for these mechanisms. This is significant because previous work to characterize Al resistance mechanisms has been performed in plants with complex genomes, such as wheat and maize, in which it is more difficult to isolate the genes involved in Al resistance.

	FOOTNOTES

   Received May 27, 1997; accepted November 20, 1997.

	ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviations: EMS, ethyl methylsulfonate. ICP-MS, inductively coupled argon plasma MS. RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The technical assistance of Jon Shaff, Steve Schaefer, and Calie Santana is much appreciated, as are the comments and suggestions from Drs. Rob Last and David Jones.

	LITERATURE  CITED

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

Aniol A (1990) Genetics of tolerance to aluminum in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Thell). Plant Soil 123: 223-227 [CrossRef]

Basu U, Godbold D, Taylor GJ (1994) Aluminum resistance in Triticum aestivum associated with enhanced exudation of malate. J Plant Physiol 144: 747-753

Bell CJ, Ecker JR (1994) Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19: 137-144 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Carver BF, Ownby JD (1995) Acid soil tolerance in wheat. Adv Agron 54: 117-173

Degenhardt J, Larsen PB, Howell SH, Kochian LV (1998) Aluminum resistance in the Arabidopsis mutant alr-104 is caused by an aluminum-induced increase in rhizosphere pH. Plant Physiol 117: 19-27 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

de la Fuente JM, Ramirez-Rodriguez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L (1997) Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science 276: 1566-1568 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Delhaize E, Craig S, Beaton CD, Bennet RJ, Jagadish V, Randall PJ (1993a) Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). I. Uptake and distribution of aluminum in root apices. Plant Physiol 103: 685-693 [Abstract]

Delhaize E, Ryan PR (1995) Update on environmental stress: aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol 107: 315-321 [ISI][Medline]

Delhaize E, Ryan PR, Randall PJ (1993b) Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Aluminum-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices. Plant Physiol 103: 695-702 [Abstract]

Ebel J, Cosio EG (1994) Elicitors of plant defense responses. Int Rev Cytol 148: 1-36

Hedrich R, Becker D (1994) Green circuits: the potential of plant specific ion channels. Plant Mol Biol 26: 1637-1650 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hedrich R, Marten I, Lohse G, Dietrich P, Winter H, Lohaus G, Heldt H-W (1994) Malate-sensitive anion channels enable guard cells to sense changes in the ambient CO₂ concentration. Plant J 6: 741-748 [CrossRef][ISI]

Hue NV, Craddock GR, Adams F (1986) Effect of organic acids on aluminum toxicity in subsoils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 28-34 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kinraide TB, Ryan PR, Kochian LV (1992) Interactive effects of Al³⁺, H⁺, and other cations on root elongation considered in terms of cell-surface electrical potential. Plant Physiol 99: 1461-1468 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kochian LV (1995) Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46: 237-260 [CrossRef][ISI]

Konieczny A, Ausubel FM (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using the co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4: 403-410 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Lafever HN, Campbell LG (1978) Inheritance of aluminum tolerance in wheat. Can J Gen Cytol 20: 355-364

Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newberg L (1987) Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174-181 [CrossRef][Medline]

Larsen PB, Kochian LV, Howell SH (1997) Al inhibits both shoot development and root growth in als3, an Al-sensitive Arabidopsis mutant. Plant Physiol 114: 1207-1214 [Abstract]

Larsen PB, Tai C-Y, Kochian LV, Howell SH (1996) Arabidopsis mutants with increased sensitivity to aluminum. Plant Physiol 110: 743-751 [Abstract]

Lincoln C, Britton JH, Estelle M (1990) Growth and development of the axr1 mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2: 1071-1080 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Linder B, Raschke K (1992) A slow anion channel in guard cells activating at large hyperpolarization may be principal for stomatal closing. FEBS Lett 313: 27-30 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Miyasaka SC, Buta JG, Howell RK, Foy CD (1991) Mechanism of aluminum tolerance in snapbeans. Root exudation of citric acid. Plant Physiol 96: 737-743 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parker DR, Zelazny LW, Kinraide TB (1987) Improvements to the program Geochem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51: 488-491 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pellet DM, Grunes DL, Kochian LV (1995) Organic acid exudation as an aluminum tolerance mechanism in maize (Zea mays L.). Planta 196: 788-795 [CrossRef][ISI]

Pellet DM, Papernik LA, Kochian LV (1996) Multiple aluminum resistance mechanisms in wheat. The roles of root apical phosphate and malate exudation. Plant Physiol 112: 591-597 [Abstract]

Reiter RS, Williams JGK, Feldmann KA, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV, Scolnik PA (1992) Global and local genome mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana by using recombinant inbred lines and random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 1477-1481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rengel Z (1996) Uptake of aluminium by plant cells. New Phytol 134: 389-406 [CrossRef]

Rincon M, Gonzales RA (1992) Aluminum partitioning in intact roots of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Plant Physiol 99: 1021-1028 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Randall PJ (1995a) Characterisation of Al-stimulated efflux of malate from the apices of Al-tolerant wheat roots. Planta 196: 103-110 [ISI]

Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Randall PJ (1995b) Malate efflux from root apices: evidence for a general mechanism of Al-tolerance in wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 531-536

Ryan PR, DiTomaso JM, Kochian LV (1993) Aluminium toxicity in roots: an investigation of spatial sensitivity and the role of the root cap. J Exp Bot 44: 437-446 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ryan PR, Skerret M, Findlay GP, Delhaize E, Tyerman SD (1997) Aluminum activates an anion channel in the apical cells of wheat roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 6547-6552 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmidt C, Schroeder JI (1994) Anion selectivity of slow anion channels in the plasma membrane of guard cells. Large nitrate permeability. Plant Physiol 106: 383-391 [Abstract]

Schreiner KA, Hoddinott J, Taylor GJ (1994) Aluminum-induced deposition of (1,3)-beta-glucans (callose) in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Soil 162: 273-280 [CrossRef]

Schroeder JI (1995) Anion channels as central mechanisms for signal transduction in guard cells and putative function in roots for plant-soil interactions. Plant Mol Biol 28: 353-361 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Thomine S, Zimmerman S, Guern J, Barbier-Brygoo H (1995) ATP-dependent regulation of an anion channel at the plasma membrane of protoplasts from epidermal cells of Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Plant Cell 7: 2091-2100 [Abstract]

Von Uexkull HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171: 1-15 [CrossRef]

Ward JM, Pei Z-M, Schroeder JI (1995) Role of ion channels in initiation of signal transduction in higher plants. Plant Cell 7: 833-844 [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Wissemeir AH, Klotz F, Horst WJ (1987) Aluminum induced callose synthesis in roots of soybean (Glycine max L.). J Plant Physiol 129: 487-492

Zhang G, Hoddinott J, Taylor GJ (1994) Characterization of 1,3-beta-D-glucan (callose) synthesis in roots of Triticum aestivum in response to aluminum toxicity. J Plant Physiol 144: 229-234

Zhang G, Taylor GJ (1990) Kinetics of aluminum uptake in Triticum aestivum L. Identity of the linear phase of aluminum uptake by excised roots of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive cultivars. Plant Physiol 94: 577-84 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Copyright Clearance Center:   0032-0889/98/117/0009/09
 
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists