|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol. (1998) 117: 745-751
High Aluminum Resistance in Buckwheat1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High Al
resistance in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. cv
Jianxi) has been suggested to be associated with both internal and
external detoxification mechanisms. In this study the characteristics of the external detoxification mechanism, Al-induced secretion of
oxalic acid, were investigated. Eleven days of P depletion failed to
induce secretion of oxalic acid. Exposure to 50 µM
LaCl3 also did not induce the secretion of oxalic acid,
suggesting that this secretion is a specific response to Al stress.
Secretion of oxalic acid was maintained for 8 h by a 3-h pulse
treatment with 150 µM Al. A nondestructive method was
developed to determine the site of the secretion along the root. Oxalic
acid was found to be secreted in the region 0 to 10 mm from the root
tip. Experiments using excised roots also showed that secretion
was located on the root tip. Four kinds of anion-channel inhibitors
showed different effects on Al-induced secretion of oxalic acid: 10 µM anthracene-9-carboxylic acid and
4,4
-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2
-disulfonate had no effect, niflumic
acid stimulated the secretion 4-fold, and phenylglyoxal inhibited
the secretion by 50%. Root elongation in buckwheat was not inhibited
by 25 µM Al or 10 µM phenylglyoxal alone
but was inhibited by 40% in the presence of Al and phenylglyoxal,
confirming that secretion of oxalic acid is associated with Al
resistance.
Al toxicity is a serious agricultural problem in acid soils, which
make up about 40% of the world's arable land (Foy et al., 1978 The proposed mechanisms of Al resistance can be classified into
exclusion mechanisms and internal tolerance mechanisms (Taylor, 1991 One of the proposed exclusion mechanisms is the secretion of
Al-chelating substances, because the chelated form of Al is less phytotoxic than the ionic form, Al3+ (Hue et al.,
1986 Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. cv Jianxi) shows
high Al resistance (Zheng et al., 1998 Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. cv Jianxi)
seeds were collected from an acid-soil area of southern China. Seeds
were soaked in distilled water overnight and then germinated on a net tray in the dark at 25°C. On d 2 the tray was put on a plastic container filled with 0.5 mM CaCl2
solution at pH 4.5. The solution was renewed every day. On d 4 or 5, seedlings of similar size were transplanted into a 1-L plastic pot
(eight seedlings per pot) containing aerated nutrient solution.
One-fifth-strength Hoagland solution was used, which contained the
macronutrients KNO3 (1.0 mM),
Ca(NO3)2 (1.0 mM), MgSO4 (0.4 mM), and
(NH4)H2PO4 (0.2 mM) and the micronutrients NaFeEDTA (20 µM), H3BO3 (3 µM), MnCl2 (0.5 µM),
CuSO4 (0.2 µM),
ZnSO4 (0.4 µM), and
(NH4)6Mo7O24 (1 µM). The solution was adjusted to pH 4.5 with 1 M HCl and renewed every other day. After 8 to 10 d of
culture in the above-described nutrient solution, the plants were
subjected to the treatments described below. Plants were grown in a
controlled-environment growth cabinet (TGE-9 h-S, TABAI Espec,
Hiroshima, Japan) with a 14-h/25°C day and a 10-h/20°C night regime
and a light intensity of 40 W m Al Resistance in Buckwheat
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
).
Al3+, the phytotoxic species, inhibits root
growth and the uptake of water and nutrients, which ultimately results
in a production decrease, although the toxicity mechanism is poorly
understood (Kochian, 1995). On the other hand, some plant species and
cultivars of the same species have developed strategies to avoid or
tolerate Al toxicity. For the selection and breeding of plants
resistant to Al toxicity, an economic and sustainable approach for
improving crop production on acid soils, it is also useful to gain an
understanding of the mechanisms used by plants for Al resistance.
;
Kochian, 1995). The main difference between these two mechanisms is in
the site of Al detoxification: symplasm (internal) or apoplasm (exclusion). The exclusion mechanism prevents Al from crossing the
plasma membrane and entering the symplasm, reaching sensitive intracellular sites (Taylor, 1991
). By contrast, the internal tolerance
mechanism immobilizes, compartmentalizes, or detoxifies Al entering the
symplasm.
). Because some organic acids such as citric acid can form a stable
complex with Al, their secretion has been reported to be involved in
the exclusion mechanism. Miyasaka et al. (1991)
presented evidence that
an Al-resistant cultivar of snapbean (Phaseolus
vulgaris) exuded higher levels of citric acid into the
rhizosphere than an Al-sensitive cultivar in response to Al stress.
Delhaize et al. (1993)
used near-isogenic wheat lines differing in Al
resistance at the Al-resistance locus (Alt 1) and found that
Al-resistant genotypes excreted 5- to 10-fold more malic acid than
Al-sensitive genotypes. After investigating a wide
range of wheat genotypes differing in Al resistance, Ryan et al.
(1995b)
suggested that Al-induced secretion of malic acid is a general
Al-resistance mechanism in wheat. Citric acid secretion was also found
to be stimulated in an Al-resistant maize line (Pellet et al., 1995
).
Recently, Ma et al. (1997c)
reported that specific secretion of citric
acid was induced by Al in Cassia tora L., an Al-resistant
species. In addition, transgenic tobacco and papaya plants have been
altered genetically by introducing a citrate synthase gene from
Pseudomonas aeruginosa in their cytoplasm (Fuente et al.,
1997
), and overproduction of citric acid resulted in increased Al
resistance in these two plants. These results confirmed that the
secretion of organic acids is related to Al resistance.
). Ten days of intermittent exposure to Al (1 d in 0.5 mM CaCl2
containing 50 µM AlCl3 at pH 4.5 alternating with 1 d in nutrient solution without Al) hardly affected root growth of the buckwheat but inhibited root growth by 65%
in an Al-sensitive cultivar of wheat (Tritium aestivum L. cv
Scout 66) and by 25% to 50% in two cultivars of oilseed rape
(Brassica rapus L. cvs 94008 and H166), two cultivars of oat
(Avena sativa L. cvs Tochiyutaka and Heoats), and an
Al-tolerant cultivar of wheat (cv Atlas 66). Recently, we found that
oxalic acid, the simplest dicarboxylic acid, was secreted by the roots of buckwheat in response to Al stress (Ma et al., 1997b
). Furthermore, Al was found to be accumulated in the leaves without toxicity. Oxalic
acid is known to be a strong Al chelator (Hue et al., 1986
), and
therefore both external and internal detoxification of Al by oxalic
acid may be involved in the high Al resistance of buckwheat. In the
present study the characteristics of Al-induced secretion of oxalic
acid were investigated in terms of the specificity, location, and
effects of anion-channel inhibitors. The role of oxalic acid in
detoxifying Al is also discussed.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
2. Each
experiment was conducted three times.
Collection of Root Exudates and Treatment Solutions
Before collection of root exudates, the roots were cleaned by placing them in 0.5 mM CaCl2 at pH 4.5 overnight. To avoid interaction between Al and other nutrients such as P, a simple salt solution containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 was used as the basal treatment. The Al solution consisted of 50 µM AlCl3, except in pulse treatment and excised-root-tip experiments, when the concentration of AlCl3 was 150 µM. The pH of all solutions was adjusted to 4.5 with 1 M HCl.
1) was added to the root exudates collected by
exposing the roots to the solution without Al for 6 h, and the
concentration of oxalic acid was monitored at different times as
described above.
Specificity Studies
To investigate whether the secretion of oxalic acid is specific to Al stress, the secretion induced by Al stress was compared with that induced by P deficiency and La3+ exposure. Twelve-day-old seedlings prepared as described above were grown in the above-described nutrient solution devoid of P. Root exudates were collected for 6 h every other day by immersing the seedlings in 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution at pH 4.5. On d 12 after P depletion, the seedlings were immersed in the Al-treatment solution and the root exudates were collected for 6 h. Treatment with La3+ was performed by exposing the seedlings to 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution containing 50 µM LaCl3 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), and root exudates were collected for 6 h. Seedlings of the same age were also exposed to Al treatment.Location of Secretion Site
To determine the location of oxalic acid secretion from the roots, two different methods were used with excised roots and intact roots. The amount of secretion from excised roots was compared between sections 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 mm from the root tip according to the method of Ryan et al. (1995a)
. Chromatography filter paper
(no. 50, Advantec, Tokyo, Japan; 10 × 5 cm) was soaked in AlCl3 solution prepared by mixing 25 mL of 5 mM AlCl3, 4 mL of 2 M
HCl, 67 mL of distilled water, and 120 mL of acetone. The paper was
then immersed in phosphate buffer solution, pH 6.86 (Wako, Tokyo,
Japan), for 3 min, followed by washing in deionized water three times
to remove excess phosphate solution. The paper was then placed onto a
layer of sponge (10 × 8 × 1 cm). Fifteen seedlings
previously exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2
solution containing 0 or 150 µM Al at pH 4.5 for 3 h
were arranged on the paper. The root tips were placed on the same line
and then covered by half of the paper. Another sponge (8 × 8 × 1 cm) was placed on the top and then the plants were incubated in a
growth chamber at 25°C. After 8 h the seedlings were removed and
the paper was washed in deionized water for 1 min. Finally, the paper
was placed in pyrocatechol violet solution (37.5 mg dissolved in 100 mL
of pH 5.6 acetate buffer) (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) for 3 min and
washed in deionized water for approximately 2 min to remove excess dye, and photographs were taken on Fuji (Tokyo, Japan) 400 color film.
Effect of Anion-Channel Inhibitors
To examine the effect of four anion-channel inhibitors on Al-induced secretion of oxalic acid, roots were treated with a solution containing 50 µM AlCl3 in 0.5 mM CaCl2 and 10 µM NIF (Sigma) or A-9-C (Aldrich) dissolved in ethanol or PG (Katayama Chemical, Osaka, Japan) or DIDS (Dojindo) dissolved in distilled water. Root exudates were collected for 6 h during the treatment.
Al), 10 µM PG, 25 µM Al
(+Al), and 10 µM PG plus 25 µM Al. The root
length was measured with a ruler before and after treatment.
Determination of Organic Acids
The root exudates and root extracts were passed through a cation-exchange column (16 × 14 mm) filled with 5 g of Amberlite IR-120B resin (H+ form, Muromachi Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), followed by an anion-exchange column (16 × 14 mm) filled with 2 g of Dowex 1X8 resin (100-200 mesh, format form) in a cold room. The organic acids retained on anion-exchange resin were eluted by 1 M HCl, and the eluate was concentrated to dryness by a rotary evaporator (40°C). After the residue was redissolved in dilute HClO4 solution, pH 2.1, the concentration of organic acids was analyzed by HPLC (Ma et al., 1997cBioassay of Toxicity of Different Al-Oxalate Complexes
The toxicity of Al-oxalate complexes with different ratios of Al to oxalic acid was assayed using corn (Zea mays L. cv Golden Cross Bantam). Seeds were soaked in water for 10 h and then germinated on moist filter paper in an incubator at 30°C. After 1 d the seedlings were transplanted into a net tray containing 100 µM CaCl2 solution at pH 4.5 in a growth chamber under the following conditions: 25°C day and 20°C night, 65% RH, light intensity 40 W m
2, and a
14-h photoperiod. After a further 2 d seedlings of similar size
were selected and subjected to the following treatments in 100 µM CaCl2 solution at pH 4.5 (six
replicates): (a)
Al (control, no Al addition), (b) +Al (20 µM as AlCl3), (c) +Al-oxalate at a
2:1 molar ratio, (d) +Al-oxalate at 1:1, and (e) +Al-oxalate at 1:2.
The Al concentration in all treatment solutions was adjusted to 20 µM. Different Al-oxalate complexes were prepared by
mixing AlCl3 and sodium oxalate at different
molar ratios. Root length was measured with a ruler before and after
treatment. The treatment period was 22 h.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To confirm Al resistance of buckwheat, the effect of Al on root
elongation was compared between buckwheat and an Al-tolerant cultivar
of wheat, Atlas 66 (Fig. 1).
Twenty-five-micromolar Al treatment hardly inhibited the root
elongation of buckwheat but inhibited the root elongation of cv Atlas
66 by about 35% during 16 h. This result was consistent with
those obtained in relatively long-term treatment of buckwheat with Al
(Zheng et al., 1998
), which showed high Al resistance.
|
Buckwheat shows high Al resistance compared with other species
such as wheat, rape, and radish (Fig. 1; Zheng et al., 1998 Received December 5, 1997;
accepted April 8, 1998.
Abbreviations:
A-9-C, anthracene-9-carboxylic acid.
DIDS, 4,4 We are grateful to Dr. Ren Fang Sheng at the Soil Research
Institute (Academic Sinica of China) for providing buckwheat seeds.
Bennet RJ,
Breen CM
(1992)
The use of lanthanum to delineate the aluminum signalling mechanisms functioning in the roots of Zea mays L.
Environ Exp Bot
32:
365-376
[CrossRef]
Delhaize E,
Ryan PR,
Randall PJ
(1993)
Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Aluminum-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices.
Plant Physiol
103:
695-702
[Abstract]
Foy CD,
Chaney RL,
White MC
(1978)
The physiology of metal toxicity in plants.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol
29:
511-566
[Web of Science]
Fuente JM,
Ramirez-Rodriguez V,
Cabrera-Ponce JL,
Herrera-Estrella L
(1997)
Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis.
Science
276:
1566-1568
Gardner WK,
Barber DA,
Parberry DG
(1983)
The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L. III. The probable mechanism by which phosphorus movement in soil/root interface is enhanced.
Plant Soil
70:
107-124
[CrossRef]
Hue NV,
Craddock GR,
Adams F
(1986)
Effect of organic acids on aluminum toxicity in subsoils.
Soil Sci Soc Am J
50:
28-34
Ishikawa S,
Wagatsuma T,
Ikarashi T
(1996)
Comparative toxicity of Al3+, Yb3+ and La3+ to root-tip cells differing in tolerance to high Al3+ in terms of ionic potentials of dehydrated trivalent cations.
Soil Sci Plant Nutr
42:
613-625
Johnson JF,
Vance CP,
Allan D
(1996)
Phosphorus deficiency in Lupinus albus. Altered lateral root development and enhanced expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase.
Plant Physiol
112:
31-41
[Abstract]
KochianLV
(1995)
Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
46:
237-260
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Lipton DS,
Blanchar RW,
Blevins DG
(1987)
Citrate, malate, and succinate concentration in exudates from P-sufficient and P-stressed Medicago sativa L. seedlings.
Plant Physiol
85:
315-317
Ma JF,
Hiradate S,
Nomoto K,
Iwashita T,
Matsumoto H
(1997a)
Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in hydrangea. Identification of Al form in the leaves.
Plant Physiol
113:
1033-1039
[Abstract]
Ma JF,
Zheng SJ,
Hiradate S,
Matsumoto H
(1997b)
Detoxifying aluminum with buckwheat.
Nature
390:
569-570
[Medline]
Ma JF,
Zheng SJ,
Matsumoto H
(1997c)
Specific secretion of citric acid induced by Al stress in Cassia tora L.
Plant Cell Physiol
38:
1019-1025
Miyasaka SC,
Bute JG,
Howell RK,
Foy CD
(1991)
Mechanism of aluminum tolerance in snapbean, root exudation of citric acid.
Plant Physiol
96:
737-743
Nordstrom DK,
May HM
(1996)
Aqueous equilibrium data for mononuclear aluminum species.
In
G Sposito,
eds, Environment Chemistry of Aluminum.
CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 39-80
Pellet DM,
Grunes DL,
Kochian LV
(1995)
Organic acid exudation as an aluminum-tolerance mechanism in maize (Zea mays L.).
Planta
196:
788-795
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Ryan PR,
Delhaize E,
Randall PJ
(1995a)
Characterisation of Al-stimulated efflux of malate from the apices of Al-tolerant wheat roots.
Planta
196:
103-110
[Web of Science]
Ryan PR,
Delhaize E,
Randall PJ
(1995b)
Malate efflux from root apices and tolerance to aluminum are highly correlated in wheat.
Aust J Plant Physiol
22:
531-536
Ryan PR,
DiTomaso JM,
Kochian LV
(1993)
Aluminum toxicity in roots: an investigation of spatial sensitivity and the role of the root cap.
J Exp Bot
44:
437-446
Ryan PR,
Skerrett M,
Findlay GP,
Delhaize E,
Tyerman SD
(1997)
Aluminum activates an anion channel in the apical cells of wheat roots.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
6547-6552
Taylor GJ
(1991)
Current views of the aluminum stress response: the physiological basis of tolerance.
Curr Top Plant Biochem Physiol
10:
57-93
Zheng SJ, Ma JF, Matsumoto H (1998) Continuous secretion of
organic acid is related to aluminum resistance in relatively long-term
exposure to aluminum stress. Physiol Plant (in press)
). For collection of root exudates in the present study, although
the plants were not grown under aseptic conditions, careful attention
was always paid to keeping the roots clean by frequent renewal of
solution and by immersing the roots in Ca solution overnight before the
collection of root exudates. By monitoring the concentration of oxalic
acid in the root exudates (both
Al and +Al) at different times, we
found that the lack of aseptic conditions did not affect the
concentration of oxalic acid (data not shown). The specificity of
Al-induced secretion of oxalic acid was investigated by comparing it
with the root's responses to P deficiency and
La3+ treatment. Oxalic acid in root exudates was
monitored every other day after the initiation of P-deficiency
treatment, but no significant amount was secreted up to 11 d (Fig.
2). When Al was added to the P-deficient
roots on d 12 after the treatment, a significant amount of oxalic acid
was secreted. Exposure to 50 µM
La3+ did not induce significant secretion of
oxalic acid (Fig. 3), whereas Al at the
same concentration induced secretion of oxalic acid at 0.70 ± 0.08 µmol h
1 g
1 root
dry weight. Combined treatment with Al3+ and
La3+ did not affect the secretion of oxalic acid
induced by Al.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2.
Effect of P deficiency followed by Al treatment on
the secretion of oxalic acid by buckwheat roots. Ten-day-old seedlings were grown in nutrient solution devoid of P, and root exudates were
collected every other day in 0.5 mM CaCl2
solution at pH 4.5 for 6 h. On d 12 and 14 after P deficiency, the
roots were exposed to 50 µM Al solution, and the root
exudates were collected for 6 h. After passage of the root
exudates through a cation-exchange resin column followed by an
anion-exchange resin column, the anionic fraction was eluted using 1 M HCl and concentrated. Organic acids were analyzed by
HPLC. Error bars represent ±SD (n = 3).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3.
Effect of La3+ and Al3+ on
the secretion of oxalic acid by buckwheat roots. Seedlings were exposed
to 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution, pH 4.5, containing 50 µM AlCl3, 50 µM
LaCl3, or both. After 6 h the root exudates were
collected and organic acids were analyzed as described in Figure 1.
Error bars represent ±SD (n = 3).
1
g
1 root dry weight during the first 3 h
(Fig. 4). This level was maintained for
8 h in control solution without Al and then gradually decreased to
the control level (
Al). In contrast, roots exposed to Al continued to
secrete oxalic acid at a high level (Fig. 4). There are two
possibilities for the pulse result. One is that Al might activate some
biochemical process such that the secretion of oxalic acid was able to
continue for several hours regardless of the Al concentration in the
external solution or in the cell wall. The other is that when the roots
were transferred from the Al solution to the Al-free solution,
sufficient Al was left in the cell wall to trigger the secretion of
oxalic acid for several hours. Since the roots were rinsed with 0.5 mM Ca solution, pH 4.5, several times and the solution was
changed twice with the Ca solution during the collection of root
exudates after pulse treatment, it is unlikely that sufficient Al was
left in the cell wall.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4.
Effect of a 3-h pulse of 150 µM Al
on the secretion of oxalic acid (
). Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution, pH 4.5, containing 150 µM AlCl3 for 3 h and subsequently to 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution, pH 4.5, without Al. Root
exudates were collected during the periods 0 to 3, 3 to 7 , 7 to 11, and 27 to 31 h. For comparison, exudates of roots continuously
exposed to 150 µM Al (
) or 0 µM (
)
were also collected at the same interval. Organic acids were analyzed
as described in Figure 1. Error bars represent ±SD
(n = 3).
Al treatment value subtracted
from the value for +Al treatment), the amount secreted from the 0- to
5-mm section (0.46 nmol tip
1) was 3 times more
than that from the 5- to 10-mm section (0.15 nmol
tip
1). About 15.1 and 5.0% of soluble oxalic
acid in the 0- to 5- and 5- to 10-mm segments were secreted during
3 h, respectively (Fig. 5).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Figure 5.
Al-induced secretion of oxalic acid from a
different section of buckwheat roots. Excised root segments 0 to 5 and
5 to 10 mm from root tips were incubated in 0.5 mM
CaCl2 solution, pH 4.5, containing 0 or 150 µM AlCl3 after washing. After 3 h the root exudates were collected. Soluble oxalic acid in the 0- to 5- and
the 5- to 10-mm root segments were extracted with distilled water at
55°C. Organic acids were analyzed as described in Figure 1. Shown are
the oxalic acid content in roots (white bars), oxalic acid excreted by
the roots not treated with Al (black bars), and oxalic acid secreted
by roots treated with Al (shaded bars). Error bars represent
±SD (n = 3).
). The oxalic acid secreted by the roots
chelates Al from the Al-P complex, and Al is removed by washing from
the filter paper, resulting in a white spot. A white spot was observed when the roots were exposed to Al previously but not in the roots without Al treatment (Fig. 6). The
secretion position was limited to 10 mm from the root tip. The amount
of oxalic acid secreted was estimated to be 0.67 nmol
root
1 from the standard solution of oxalic acid
(Fig. 6).

View larger version (92K):
[in a new window]
Figure 6.
Location of secretion of oxalic acid (OX) along
buckwheat roots. Fifteen roots exposed to 0 or 150 µM Al
for 3 h were placed on the filter paper. After 8 h the amount
of oxalic acid was assayed by the method described in ``Materials and Methods''. For quantification, 5 µL of a 1- to 4-mM
oxalic acid solution was spotted onto the filter paper and assayed by
the same procedures as intact roots (top).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Figure 7.
Effect of anion-channel inhibitors on Al-induced
secretion of oxalic acid. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM
CaCl2 solution, pH 4.5, containing 50 µM Al
in the presence or absence of each inhibitor (10 µM).
After 6 h root exudates were collected, and organic acids were
analyzed as described in Figure 1. Error bars represent
±SD (n = 3).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Figure 8.
Combined effect of Al and PG on root elongation in
buckwheat. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM
CaCl2 solution, pH 4.5, containing no Al (
Al), 25 µM Al (+Al), 10 µM PG, or 25 µM Al plus 10 µM PG for 16 h. Error
bars represent ±SD (n = 10).

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Figure 9.
Effect of different molar ratios of Al to oxalic
acid on the root elongation of corn. The Al concentration was 20 µM in 0.1 mM CaCl2 solution.
Seedlings were exposed to different treatment solutions for 22 h.
Error bars represent ±SD (n = 6).
![]()
DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
). One of
the mechanisms responsible for its high resistance is the secretion
of oxalic acid (Ma et al., 1997b
) that occurs within 30 min after
Al exposure and increases with increasing external Al concentration. In
the present study the characteristics of such Al-induced secretion of
oxalic acid was investigated. To examine the specificity of secretion,
the response of roots to P deficiency and La treatments was compared
with the response to Al treatment. La, which has the same charge as Al,
is also reported to be toxic to plants (Bennet and Breen, 1992
). It
inhibits root elongation in both rice and pea more strongly than Al
does (Ishikawa et al., 1996
). On the other hand, secretion of organic acids has been reported to be a response of plants to P deficiency. White lupin and alfalfa secrete citric acid in response to P deficiency (Gardner et al., 1983
; Lipton et al., 1987
). Because Al is easily precipitated with P, organic acid secretion may be caused indirectly by
Al-induced P deficiency (Miyasaka et al., 1991
). However, the results
have clearly indicated that neither P deficiency nor La addition
induced significant secretion of oxalic acid (Figs. 2 and 3),
suggesting that the secretion of oxalic acid is a specific response to
Al stress. One day of P deficiency also failed to induce secretion of
malic acid in wheat (Delhaize et al., 1993
). In Cassia tora
L., neither P deficiency nor La and Yb induced secretion of citric acid
(Ma et al., 1997c
). All of these findings indicate that the secretion
of organic acids induced by Al is a response different from that to P
deficiency. Usually, induction of organic acid secretion by P
deficiency takes longer (more than 10 d; Johnson et al., 1996
),
but Al-induced secretion of organic acid occurs within several hours
(Ryan et al., 1995a
; Ma et al., 1997c
).
;
Delhaize et al., 1993
; Pellet et al., 1995
; Ma et al., 1997c
). However,
it is unknown whether the amount of organic acids secreted is
sufficient to detoxify Al. The primary site of Al toxicity is localized
to the root apex (Ryan et al., 1993
); therefore, it is a prerequisite
to protect the root apex from Al injury. In wheat and corn the
secretion of organic acids was localized to the root apex using the
divided-root-chamber technique (Delhaize et al., 1993
; Pellet et al.,
1995
). Using excised roots and a nondestructive method, we also showed
that the secretion site of oxalic acid was localized to the root apex
(0-10 mm from root tip; Figs. 5 and 6). Some attempts have been made
to estimate the concentration of organic acids at the root surface
based on data concerning organic acid efflux in the bulk solution.
However, such estimation is very difficult because there are many
related factors, such as the thickness of the unstirred layer, the
length of root apex that should be protected, the diffusion
coefficient, mucilage, and so on (Ryan et al., 1995b
). In the present
study we used an anion-channel inhibitor to demonstrate that the
secretion of oxalic acid is associated with Al resistance in buckwheat. One of the anion-channel inhibitors, PG, was found to inhibit secretion
of oxalic acid (Fig. 7). When PG or Al alone was added to the solution,
the root elongation of buckwheat was not inhibited, but when roots were
exposed to Al in the presence of PG, the root elongation of buckwheat
was inhibited by 40% (Fig. 8). This result indicates that the
secretion of oxalic acid contributes to high Al resistance in
buckwheat.
), and this
secretion was hypothesized to be through an anion channel located on
the plasma membrane (Ryan et al., 1995a
). In excised wheat roots, the
anion-channel inhibitors NIF and A-9-C inhibited malic acid secretion,
whereas DIDS had no effect (Ryan et al., 1995a
). Recently, the same
investigators reported that an anion channel in the apical cells of
wheat roots was activated by Al3+ but not by
La3+ (Ryan et al., 1997
). In the present study we
examined the effects of four kinds of anion-channel inhibitors on the
secretion of oxalic acid in intact roots. One of them, PG, inhibited
the secretion of oxalic acid, but DIDS and A-9-C had no effect on
oxalic acid secretion (Fig. 7). NIF stimulated the secretion of oxalic
acid. Moreover, the amount of secretion was increased with increasing external NIF concentrations (data not shown). We checked the secretion of oxalic acid when NIF was added alone (since NIF probably caused leakage of organic acids from roots), but none was detected. This result suggests that some interactions among Al, NIF, and anion channels caused enhancement of oxalic acid secretion, although the
mechanism is not clear.
). The bioassay experiment showed that the 1:2 complex of
Al-oxalate was nonphytotoxic for corn (Fig. 9). The Al-citrate complex
with a 1:1 ratio was found to be nontoxic to the root growth of corn
using the same assay system (Ma et al., 1997a
). The Al-citrate (1:1)
complex has a stable constant of 10.72, which is close to that of the
1:2 Al-oxalate complex. These findings suggest that both the
concentration and stability constant of a chelator are important in
detoxifying Al.
1
This study was supported in part by a
grant-in-aid for Scientific Research, for Encouragement of Young
Scientists, for Creative Basic Research, for Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science Fellows, and for Scientific Research on Priority
Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of
Japan, by a Sunbor grant, and by the Ohara Foundation for Agricultural
Sciences.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
2
Present address: College of Resources and
Environment, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Peoples'
Republic of China.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail maj{at}rib.okayama-u.ac.jp; fax
81-86-434-1249.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2
-disulfonate.
NIF, niflumic acid.
PG, phenylglyoxal.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
![]()
LITERATURE CITED
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Copyright Clearance Center: 0032-0889/98/117/0745/07
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. R. Ryan, H. Raman, S. Gupta, W. J. Horst, and E. Delhaize A Second Mechanism for Aluminum Resistance in Wheat Relies on the Constitutive Efflux of Citrate from Roots Plant Physiology, January 1, 2009; 149(1): 340 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimmen Electrophysiological Characterization of the Node in Chara corallina: Functional Differentiation for Wounding Response Plant Cell Physiol., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 264 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Li, Z. H. Ye, and M. H. Wong Effects of bacteria on enhanced metal uptake of the Cd/Zn-hyperaccumulating plant, Sedum alfredii J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2007; 58(15-16): 4173 - 4182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kobayashi, O. A. Hoekenga, H. Itoh, M. Nakashima, S. Saito, J. E. Shaff, L. G. Maron, M. A. Pineros, L. V. Kochian, and H. Koyama Characterization of AtALMT1 Expression in Aluminum-Inducible Malate Release and Its Role for Rhizotoxic Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, November 1, 2007; 145(3): 843 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Furukawa, N. Yamaji, H. Wang, N. Mitani, Y. Murata, K. Sato, M. Katsuhara, K. Takeda, and J. F. Ma An Aluminum-Activated Citrate Transporter in Barley Plant Cell Physiol., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1081 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Yang, J. F. You, Y. Y. Li, P. Wu, and S. J. Zheng Magnesium Enhances Aluminum-Induced Citrate Secretion in Rice Bean Roots (Vigna umbellata) by Restoring Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Activity Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ligaba, M. Katsuhara, P. R. Ryan, M. Shibasaka, and H. Matsumoto The BnALMT1 and BnALMT2 Genes from Rape Encode Aluminum-Activated Malate Transporters That Enhance the Aluminum Resistance of Plant Cells Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1294 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. YANG, L. ZHANG, Y. Y. LI, J. F. YOU, P. WU, and S. J. ZHENG Citrate Transporters Play a Critical Role in Aluminium-stimulated Citrate Efflux in Rice Bean (Vigna umbellata) Roots Ann. Bot., April 1, 2006; 97(4): 579 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Gabrielson, J. D. Cancel, L. F. Morua, and P. B. Larsen Identification of dominant mutations that confer increased aluminium tolerance through mutagenesis of the Al-sensitive Arabidopsis mutant, als3-1 J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(4): 943 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Zheng, J. L. Yang, Y. F. He, X. H. Yu, L. Zhang, J. F. You, R. F. Shen, and H. Matsumoto Immobilization of Aluminum with Phosphorus in Roots Is Associated with High Aluminum Resistance in Buckwheat Plant Physiology, May 1, 2005; 138(1): 297 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Yang, S. J. Zheng, Y. F. He, and H. Matsumoto Aluminium resistance requires resistance to acid stress: a case study with spinach that exudes oxalate rapidly when exposed to Al stress J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2005; 56(414): 1197 - 1203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Hayes and J. F. Ma Al-induced efflux of organic acid anions is poorly associated with internal organic acid metabolism in triticale roots J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2003; 54(388): 1753 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Cumming and J. Ning Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance aluminium resistance of broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus L.) J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2003; 54(386): 1447 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohno, H. Koyama, and T. Hara Characterization of Citrate Transport through the Plasma Membrane in a Carrot Mutant Cell Line with Enhanced Citrate Excretion Plant Cell Physiol., February 15, 2003; 44(2): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kollmeier, P. Dietrich, C. S. Bauer, W. J. Horst, and R. Hedrich Aluminum Activates a Citrate-Permeable Anion Channel in the Aluminum-Sensitive Zone of the Maize Root Apex. A Comparison Between an Aluminum- Sensitive and an Aluminum-Resistant Cultivar Plant Physiology, May 1, 2001; 126(1): 397 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Osawa and H. Matsumoto Possible Involvement of Protein Phosphorylation in Aluminum-Responsive Malate Efflux from Wheat Root Apex Plant Physiology, May 1, 2001; 126(1): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W.-H. Zhang, P. R. Ryan, and S. D. Tyerman Malate-Permeable Channels and Cation Channels Activated by Aluminum in the Apical Cells of Wheat Roots Plant Physiology, March 1, 2001; 125(3): 1459 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Wenzl, G. M. Patiño, A. L. Chaves, J. E. Mayer, and I. M. Rao The High Level of Aluminum Resistance in Signalgrass Is Not Associated with Known Mechanisms of External Aluminum Detoxification in Root Apices Plant Physiology, March 1, 2001; 125(3): 1473 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Piñeros and L. V. Kochian A Patch-Clamp Study on the Physiology of Aluminum Toxicity and Aluminum Tolerance in Maize. Identification and Characterization of Al3+-Induced Anion Channels Plant Physiology, January 1, 2001; 125(1): 292 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Yang, J.-Y. Jung, W.-Y. Song, H.-S. Suh, and Y. Lee Identification of Rice Varieties with High Tolerance or Sensitivity to Lead and Characterization of the Mechanism of Tolerance Plant Physiology, November 1, 2000; 124(3): 1019 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. F. Li, J. F. Ma, and H. Matsumoto Pattern of Aluminum-Induced Secretion of Organic Acids Differs between Rye and Wheat Plant Physiology, August 1, 2000; 123(4): 1537 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Dunwell, S. Khuri, and P. J. Gane Microbial Relatives of the Seed Storage Proteins of Higher Plants: Conservation of Structure and Diversification of Function during Evolution of the Cupin Superfamily Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2000; 64(1): 153 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kollmeier, H. H. Felle, and W. J. Horst Genotypical Differences in Aluminum Resistance of Maize Are Expressed in the Distal Part of the Transition Zone. Is Reduced Basipetal Auxin Flow Involved in Inhibition of Root Elongation by Aluminum? Plant Physiology, March 1, 2000; 122(3): 945 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|