|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol. (1998) 117: 753-759
High Aluminum Resistance in Buckwheat1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. cv Jianxi), which shows high Al resistance, accumulates Al in the leaves. The internal detoxification mechanism was studied by purifying and identifying Al complexes in the leaves and roots. About 90% of Al accumulated in the leaves was found in the cell sap, in which the dominant organic acid was oxalic acid. Purification of the Al complex in the cell sap of leaves by molecular-sieve chromatography resulted in a complex with a ratio of Al to oxalic acid of 1:3. A 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance study of the purified cell sap revealed only one signal at a chemical shift 164.4 ppm, which was assigned to the Al-chelated carboxylic group of oxalic acid. A 27Al-nuclear magnetic resonance analysis revealed one major signal at the chemical shift of 16.0 to 17.0 ppm, with a minor signal at the chemical shift of 11.0 to 12 ppm in both the intact roots and their cell sap, which is consistent with the Al-oxalate complexes at 1:3 and 1:2 ratios, respectively. The purified cell sap was not phytotoxic to root elongation in corn (Zea mays). All of these results indicate that Al tolerance in the roots and leaves of buckwheat is achieved by the formation of a nonphytotoxic Al-oxalate (1:3) complex.
Al3+ is toxic to most plant species, but
some can accumulate Al without showing any toxicity. Tea and hydrangea
are well-known Al accumulators. Old leaves of tea can accumulate Al up
to 30,000 mg kg The buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) is an important
economic crop in Asia. The cv Jianxi, which is cultivated in the
acid-soil area of southern China, was found to show high resistance to
Al toxicity (Zheng et al., 1998a Following 10 d of intermittent treatment with 50 µM
Al, the Al concentration of the buckwheat leaves reached about 450 mg Al kg Plant Materials and Al Treatment
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1 on a dry-weight basis
(Matsumoto et al., 1976
), and the Al content in the leaves of hydrangea
plants with blue-sepaled flowers can become higher than 3,000 mg
kg
1 (Ma et al., 1997a
). Some trees in tropical
cloud forests (such as Richeria grandis) have
also been reported to accumulate high levels of Al (more than 1,000 mg
kg
1; Cuenca et al., 1990
). Recently, several
plants (Melastoma malabathricum and Vaccinium
macrocarpon; Osaki et al., 1997
) adapted to low-pH soils were
found to accumulate high Al in either roots or leaves. Although
localization of Al in the cells of these plants has not yet been well
identified, several reports have suggested the presence of Al in the
symplasm in a soluble form (Cuenca et al., 1990
). At the pH of
symplasmic solution (>7.0), the concentration of free
Al3+ is decreased to less than
10
10 M due to the formation of
insoluble Al(OH)3 (Martin, 1988
), but this does
not imply that such low concentrations are biologically inert (Taylor,
1991
). Because of the high affinity of Al for
O2-donor compounds such as Pi, nucleotides, RNA,
DNA, proteins, carboxylic acids, phospholipids, polygalacturonic acids,
heteropolysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, flavonoids, anthocyanins,
etc. (Haug, 1984
; Martin, 1986
), very low concentrations of free Al in
the symplasm are potentially phytotoxic (Taylor, 1991
). For example,
Al3+ binds almost 107 times more
strongly to ATP than does Mg2+; therefore, less
than nanomolar amounts of Al3+ can compete with
Mg for the P sites (Martin, 1988
). These facts suggest that
Al-accumulating plants must possess effective mechanisms for
detoxifying Al internally. However, these mechanisms have not been well
documented.
, 1998b
), and one of the mechanisms responsible for the high Al resistance in this cultivar was the secretion of oxalic acid, a strong Al chelator, by the roots (Ma et
al., 1997b
; Zheng et al., 1998b
). This response was very rapid (occurring within 30 min after exposure to Al solution) and was specific to Al stress; neither P deficiency nor other toxic metals such
as La could induce the secretion of oxalic acid. Furthermore, we found
that cv Jianxi accumulated Al in the leaves.
1 on a dry-weight basis, in contrast to
other species such as wheat, oat, radish, and rape, which contained
less than 50 mg Al kg
1 after the same treatment
(Ma et al., 1997b
). However, the Al concentration in buckwheat roots
was less than that of other species. Based on a
27Al-NMR study, the form of Al in the buckwheat
leaves has been suggested to be an Al-oxalate complex at a 1:3 ratio
(Ma et al., 1997b
). In the present study the Al complex in the leaves
was purified and identified using 13C-NMR, and
the form of Al in the roots was also examined using 27Al-NMR. The results indicate that accumulation
of Al as Al-oxalate (1:3) complex, a nonphytotoxic form, is also
responsible for high Al resistance in buckwheat.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
). Ten-day-old seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM
CaCl2 solution containing 0 or 50 µM Al at pH
4.5 every other day. The seedlings were grown in the nutrient solution
on the other days. The purpose for this intermittent Al treatment was
to avoid interaction between Al and other nutrients such as P. After a
10-d repeated treatment, plants were harvested and separated into roots
and leaves. Leaves were stored at
80°C for cell sap extraction. To
observe Al formation in the roots after a short exposure to Al
solution, root samples for 27Al-NMR measurement
and cell sap extraction were prepared by exposing 20-d-old seedlings to
50 µM Al in 0.5 mM
CaCl2 solution at pH 4.5 for 20 h. The
plants were grown in a growth cabinet (TGE-9 h-S, TABAI Espec,
Hiroshima, Japan) at 25/20°C and 14-/10-h day/night cycles, 40 W
m
2 light intensity, and 70% RH.
Extraction and Purification of the Cell Sap
Frozen samples were ground by hand and then placed on filters in centrifuge tubes (Centricut U-50, Mr cutoff 50,000, Biofield, Tokyo, Japan). Before completely thawing at room temperature, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000g for 20 min to obtain the cell sap (Ma et al., 1997a
1. The
concentration of Al in each fraction was determined by graphite furnace
atomic absorption spectrophotometry (model Z-9000, Hitachi, Tokyo,
Japan). Organic acids in each fraction were determined by HPLC equipped
with an ion-exclusion column (Shimpack SCR-102H, 0.8 × 30 cm,
Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan; Ma et al., 1997a13C- and 27Al-NMR Measurement
13C-NMR spectra of purified cell sap and Al-oxalate (1:25) complex (similar ratio as that in the crude cell sap) were recorded on a 150.8-MHz spectrometer (JNM-
-600) under the
following conditions: frequency range, 40.65 kHz; data points, 16,384;
acquisition time, 0.20 s; and scans, 40,000. The Al-oxalate (1:25)
complex was prepared by mixing an equal volume of 4 mM
AlCl3 and 100 mM
Na2C2O4,
and then the pH was adjusted to 4.6 using 0.1 M
HCl.
-600 spectrometer, JEOL). The roots were cut with scissors and
then placed in NMR tubes 10 mm in diameter. Solution samples were
analyzed using NMR tubes 5 mm in diameter. The parameters used were:
frequency range, 62.5 kHz; data points, 33,000; acquisition time,
0.52 s. AlCl3 (0.2 mM in 0.1 M HCl) was used as an external reference for calibration of
the chemical shift (0 ppm).
Bioassay of Al Toxicity
To examine the toxicity of Al complex purified from cell sap of buckwheat leaves, the effect on root elongation of corn (Zea mays L. cv Golden Cross Bantam) was investigated. Seedlings were prepared as described previously (Zheng et al., 1998b
Al (control, no
Al addition), (b) +Al (addition of 20 µM AlCl3), and (c) +Sap (purified cell sap
containing 20 µM Al from the buckwheat leaves as
described above). The treatment period was 20 h. Root length was
measured with a ruler before and after treatment.
Al) or
with 20 µM AlCl3 (+Al3+) or 20 µM Al-oxalate complex
at a 1:1, 1:2, or 1:3 molar ratio. After 20 h the roots were
placed in distilled water for 5 min and then stained with a 0.1%
aqueous solution of Eriochrome Cyanine R solution (Sigma) for 10 min.
The excess dye was removed by washing with distilled water and then the
roots were observed with a light microscope (model B061, Olympus). The
root length was measured before and after treatment.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Buckwheat leaves accumulated as much as 2.01 mmol Al
kg
1 fresh weight following 10 d of
intermittent treatment with 50 µM Al (Table
I), and the roots contained 3.45 mmol Al
kg
1 fresh weight after 20 h of exposure to
Al solution. Roots intermittently treated with Al for 10 d
contained a similar Al concentration (data not shown). About 90% of
the Al in the leaves was found in the cell sap, where the concentration
was higher than 2 mM (Table I). About 60% of Al in the
roots was extracted in the cell sap. The major organic acid was oxalic
acid (Fig. 1), at a concentration of
about 50 mM in the cell sap of leaves with or without Al
treatment (Table I).
|
|
Several potential mechanisms of internal tolerance for Al have
been suggested, including chelation in the cytosol, compartmentation in
the vacuole, Al-binding proteins, evolution of Al-tolerant enzymes, and
elevated enzyme activity (Taylor, 1991 Received December 5, 1997;
accepted April 8, 1998.
We are grateful to Dr. Hideo Naoki (Suntory Institute for
Bioorganic Research, Osaka, Japan) for fast-atom bombardment-MS measurement.
Cuenca G,
Herrera R,
Medina E
(1990)
Aluminum tolerance in trees of a tropical cloud forest.
Plant Soil
125:
169-175
Haraguchi H,
Fujiwara S
(1969)
Aluminum complexes in solution as studied by aluminum-27.
J Phys Chem
73:
3467-3473
Haug A
(1984)
Molecular aspects of aluminum toxicity.
CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci
1:
345-373
Hue NV,
Craddock GR,
Adams F
(1986)
Effect of organic acids on aluminum toxicity in subsoils.
Soil Sci Soc Am J
50:
28-34
Kerven GL,
Larsen PL,
Bell LC,
Edwards DG
(1995)
Quantitative 27Al NMR spectroscopic studies of Al(III) complexes with organic acid ligands and their comparison with GEOCHEM predicated values.
Plant Soil
171:
35-39
Kochian LV
(1995)
Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
46:
237-260
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Lazof DB,
Goldsmith JG,
Rufty TW,
Linton RW
(1994)
Rapid uptake of aluminum into cells of intact soybean root tips.
Plant Physiol
106:
1107-1114
[Abstract]
Libert B,
Franceschi VR
(1987)
Oxalate in crop plants.
J Agric Food Chem
35:
926-938
[CrossRef]
Ma JF,
Hiradate S,
Nomoto K,
Iwashita T,
Matsumoto H
(1997a)
Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in hydrangea. Identification of Al form in the leaves.
Plant Physiol
113:
1033-1039
[Abstract]
Ma JF,
Zheng SJ,
Hiradate S,
Matsumoto H
(1997b)
Detoxifying aluminum with buckwheat.
Nature
390:
569-570
[Medline]
Martin F,
Rubini P,
Cote R,
Kottke I
(1994)
Aluminum polyphosphate complexes in the mycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor: a 27Al-nuclear magnetic resonance study.
Planta
194:
241-246
Martin RB
(1986)
The chemistry of aluminum as related to biology and medicine.
Clin Chem
32:
1797-1806
Martin RB (1988) Bioinorganic chemistry of aluminum. In
H Sigel, A Sigel, eds, Metal Ions in Biological Systems: Aluminum and
Its Role in Biology, Vol 24. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1-57
Matsumoto H,
Hirasawa E,
Morimura S,
Takahashi E
(1976)
Localization of aluminum in tea leaves.
Plant Cell Physiol
17:
627-631
Nagata T,
Hayatsu M,
Kosuge N
(1992)
Identification of aluminum forms in tea leaves by 27Al NMR.
Phytochemistry
31:
1215-1218
[CrossRef]
Nordstrom DK,
May HM
(1996)
Aqueous equilibrium data for mononuclear aluminum species.
In
G Sposito,
eds, Environment Chemistry of Aluminum.
CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 39-80
Osaki M,
Watanabe T,
Tadano T
(1997)
Beneficial effect of aluminum on growth of plants adapted to low pH soils.
Soil Sci Plant Nutr
43:
551-563
Ryan PR,
DiTomaso JM,
Kochian LV
(1993)
Aluminum toxicity in roots: an investigation of spatial sensitivity and the role of the root cap.
J Exp Bot
44:
437-446
Taylor GJ
(1991)
Current views of the aluminum stress response: the physiological basis of tolerance.
Curr Top Plant Biochem Physiol
10:
57-93
Zheng SJ, Ma JF, Matsumoto H (1998a) Continuous secretion of
organic acid is related to aluminum resistance in relatively long-term
exposure to aluminum stress. Physiol Plant (in press)
Zheng SJ, Ma, JF, Matsumoto H (1998b) High aluminum resistance in
buckwheat. I. Aluminum-induced specific secretion of oxalic acid from
root tips. Plant Physiol 117: 745-751
View this table:
Table II.
Amount of Al and oxalic acid in the crude and
purified cell sap of buckwheat leaves

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2.
Molecular-sieve Sephadex G-10 chromatography
(fourth) of the cell sap of buckwheat leaves. The crude cell sap was
prepared from the leaves of buckwheat intermittently exposed to 50 µM Al in 0.5 mM CaCl2, pH 4.5, for 10 d. Dilute HClO4 solution, pH 4.6, was used as
the eluant, and fractions (3 mL each) were collected at a flow rate of
0.72 mL min
1.
, Al;
, oxalic acid.
at
m/z 89 (data not shown), indicating that the ligand
chelated with Al in buckwheat leaves is oxalic acid.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3.
13C-NMR spectra of Al-oxalate (1:25)
complex (A) and the purified cell sap of buckwheat leaves (B).
Buckwheat was intermittently exposed to 50 µM Al in 0.5 mM CaCl2, pH 4.5, for 10 d. The crude cell
sap was purified four times by Sephadex G-10 column chromatography. Spectra were measured at 150.8 MHz. See ``Materials and Methods'' for
the purification process and measurement conditions.
). The chemical shift of major
signal in the roots was similar to that observed in the leaves (Ma et
al., 1997b
). Since the chemical shift suggested that the Al may be
chelated with organic acids, the organic acids in the cell sap were
analyzed by HPLC. The major organic acid was oxalic acid at a
concentration of 8.8 mM in the cell sap of the roots (Table
I).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4.
27Al-NMR spectra of intact roots
exposed to 0 (A) or 50 µM (B) Al for 20 h or the
cell sap (C) extracted from the roots exposed to 50 µM Al for 20 h. Spectra were measured at 156.3 MHz. See ``Materials and Methods'' for measurement conditions.
).
This suggests that the Al in buckwheat roots is present in the form of
Al-oxalate complexes at a molar ratio of 1:3 and 1:2.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Figure 5.
27Al-NMR spectra of Al-oxalate
complexes with a 1:1 (A), 1:2 (B), or 1:3 (C) molar ratio of Al to
oxalic acid. The pH of the solution was 4.6. Spectra were measured at
156.3 MHz.
). The toxicity of the purified cell sap was tested by
investigating the effect on the root elongation of corn. A 20-h
treatment with 20 µM AlCl3 in 100 µM CaCl2 solution inhibited the
elongation of corn roots by 50%, whereas the purified cell sap
containing the same concentration of Al (20 µM) did not inhibit root elongation (Fig. 6). This
suggests that the purified Al complex is not phytotoxic.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Figure 6.
Effect of the purified cell sap of buckwheat
leaves on the root elongation of corn. Roots were exposed to 100 µM CaCl2 solution containing 0 (
Al) or 20 µM AlCl3 (+Al) or 20 µM Al
complex purified from the cell sap of buckwheat leaves. The treatment
period was 20 h. Values are means ± SD of 10 replicates.
). Binding of Al-oxalate complexes with
different ratios of Al to oxalic acid to roots was investigated by
staining with Eriochrome Cyanine R using cv Scout 66, an
Al-sensitive cultivar of wheat. Heavy staining was observed in the root
apex treated with Al3+, but no staining was
observed in the roots treated with 1:2 and 1:3 Al-oxalate complexes
even though roots treated with 1:1 Al-oxalate were also stained (Fig.
7). The 1:3 complex did not inhibit the root elongation at all, but a 20-h exposure to 20 µM
AlCl3 inhibited it by 90% (data not shown). This
suggests that oxalic acid prevents binding of Al to the cellular
components, thereby detoxifying Al.

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
Figure 7.
Staining patterns of wheat cv Scout 66 roots
exposed to Al-oxalate complexes with different molar ratios of Al to
oxalic acid. Roots were exposed to 100 µM
CaCl2 solution containing 0 (
Al) or 20 µM
AlCl3 (+Al) or 20 µM 1:1, 1:2, or 1:3
Al-oxalate complexes. After 20 h the roots were stained with
Eriochome Cyanine R. Pink color shows the binding of Al to the root
apex.
![]()
DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
; Kochian, 1995
). However, there
is still little evidence supporting these mechanisms. Because
Al3+ has a high affinity for cellular components,
forms other than Al3+ must be present in
Al-tolerant plants. However, very little is known about the Al form in
plants. In tea leaves most of the Al was proposed to be bound to
catechins, based on the observed signal on the
27Al-NMR spectrum (Nagata et al., 1992
). However,
such a complex has not been isolated or identified. In the vacuoles of
the mycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor, Al was
present in the form of polyphosphate complexes (Martin et al., 1994
).
Previously, we found that more than two-thirds of the Al in hydrangea
leaves was present in the cell sap in a soluble form, and this Al form has been identified as Al-citrate complex at a 1:1 molar ratio of Al to
citric acid (Ma et al., 1997a
). We therefore suggest that internal
detoxification of Al in hydrangea leaves is achieved by the formation
of the Al-citrate complex, a nonphytotoxic form.
), which was apparently
different from those observed in hydrangea leaves (broad signal at
chemical shift 11-12 ppm) but was consistent with that of Al-oxalate
complex at 1:3 ratio. Four purifications by Sephadex G-10 resulted in a
complex with a molar ratio of Al to oxalic acid of 1:3 (Table II; Fig.
2). The ligand chelated with Al had the same retention time as oxalic acid on HPLC (Fig. 1). A 13C-NMR study revealed
that the chemical shift of purified Al complex was consistent with that
of a 1:3 Al-oxalate complex (Fig. 3). All of these results suggested
that the Al in buckwheat leaves was complexed with oxalic acid at a
molar ratio of 1:3.
). Oxalic acid can form three species of complexes with Al
at an Al to oxalic acid molar ratio of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3, but 1:3
Al-oxalate complex is the most stable, with a stability constant of
12.4 (Nordstrom and May, 1996
). This stability constant is much higher
than that of Al-citrate (8.1) or Al-ATP (10.9; Martin, 1988
), meaning
that formation of a 1:3 Al-oxalate complex can prevent binding of Al to
cellular components, thereby detoxifying Al.
), and we suggest here that the extent of Al detoxification
depends on the molar ratio of Al to oxalic acid. Two times more oxalic
acid than Al did not inhibit root elongation of cotton, but complexes
with less than this ratio inhibited the root elongation (Hue et al.,
1986
). The Al-oxalate complex at 1:2 did not inhibit root elongation of
corn at all (Zheng et al., 1998b
). In the present study the purified
cell sap containing a 1:3 Al-oxalate complex did not show toxicity
affecting elongation in corn roots (Fig. 6). The staining results
clearly showed that the 1:1 Al-oxalate complex was bound to the root
apex of an Al-sensitive cultivar of wheat (Scout 66), whereas no
binding of Al to the roots was observed upon exposure to an Al-oxalate
complex with a molar ratio of oxalic acid to Al higher than 2 (Fig. 7).
All of these findings indicate that the 1:3 Al-oxalate complex is nontoxic. The difference in Al-oxalate complexes with different ratios
in detoxifying Al can be attributable to their different stability
constants, which result in different activities of free Al3+.
). Because there was no big difference in the concentration of
oxalic acid in the cell sap between leaves treated with Al and those
not treated with Al (Table I), it is unlikely that de novo biosynthesis
of oxalic acid was induced by Al. Al was also mainly present in the
form of a 1:3 complex in buckwheat roots based on the chemical shift of
27Al (Fig. 4). Thus, the Al complex in the leaves
may be translocated from the roots, although the form of translocation
remains to be identified.
). One possibility of Al entering the roots is
that secreted oxalic acid chelates with external Al, and then the
Al-oxalate is taken up by the roots. However, we found that more Al was
accumulated in the leaves when the roots were exposed to the
AlCl3 solution compared with roots exposed to the
Al-oxalate complex at 1:3 (data not shown). This result suggests that
some of Al3+ may be directly transported into the
cell, which then forms a complex with internal oxalic acid. Further
research is needed to confirm this.
). Short-term Al treatment (16 h) also showed that buckwheat had
higher resistance to Al compared with an Al-tolerant cultivar of wheat,
Atlas 66 (Zheng et al., 1998b
). One of the mechanisms responsible for
this high resistance in buckwheat is proposed to be rapid and specific
secretion of oxalic acid by the roots (Ma et al., 1997b
; Zheng et al.,
1998b
). The secretion of oxalic acid can prevent
Al3+ from entering the roots. However, recent
studies indicate that a fraction of the Al enters the root symplasm
fairly rapidly (Lazof et al., 1994
) and is thought to interact at many
cellular sites (Kochian, 1995
). This suggests that internal tolerance
mechanisms are also required for high Al resistance. Internal
detoxification of Al by the formation of a 1:3 Al-oxalate complex in
both the roots and leaves is also responsible for high Al resistance in buckwheat.
1
This study was supported in part by a
grant-in-aid for Scientific Research, for Encouragement of Young
Scientists, for Creative Basic Research, and for Scientific Research on
Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture of Japan, by a Sunbor grant, and by the Ohara Foundation for
Agricultural Sciences.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
*
Corresponding author; e-mail maj{at}rib.okayama-u.ac.jp; fax
81-86-434-1249.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
![]()
LITERATURE CITED
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Copyright Clearance Center: 0032-0889/98/117/0753/07
© 1998 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Gabrielson, J. D. Cancel, L. F. Morua, and P. B. Larsen Identification of dominant mutations that confer increased aluminium tolerance through mutagenesis of the Al-sensitive Arabidopsis mutant, als3-1 J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(4): 943 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Zheng, J. L. Yang, Y. F. He, X. H. Yu, L. Zhang, J. F. You, R. F. Shen, and H. Matsumoto Immobilization of Aluminum with Phosphorus in Roots Is Associated with High Aluminum Resistance in Buckwheat Plant Physiology, May 1, 2005; 138(1): 297 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Pineros, J. E. Shaff, H. S. Manslank, V. M. Carvalho Alves, and L. V. Kochian Aluminum Resistance in Maize Cannot Be Solely Explained by Root Organic Acid Exudation. A Comparative Physiological Study Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 231 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shen, T. Iwashita, and J. F. Ma Form of Al changes with Al concentration in leaves of buckwheat J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2004; 55(394): 131 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ermolayev, W. Weschke, and R. Manteuffel Comparison of Al-induced gene expression in sensitive and tolerant soybean cultivars J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2003; 54(393): 2745 - 2756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Cumming and J. Ning Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance aluminium resistance of broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus L.) J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2003; 54(386): 1447 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shen and J. F. Ma Distribution and mobility of aluminium in an Al-accumulating plant, Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2001; 52(361): 1683 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Dunwell, S. Khuri, and P. J. Gane Microbial Relatives of the Seed Storage Proteins of Higher Plants: Conservation of Structure and Diversification of Function during Evolution of the Cupin Superfamily Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2000; 64(1): 153 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|