|
Plant Physiol. (1999) 119: 463-470
The Arabidopsis CBF Gene Family Is Composed of Three
Genes Encoding AP2 Domain-Containing Proteins Whose Expression Is
Regulated by Low Temperature but Not by Abscisic Acid or
Dehydration1
Joaquín Medina,
Mónica Bargues,
Javier Terol,
Manuel Pérez-Alonso, and
Julio Salinas*
Departamento de Mejora Genética y Biotecnología,
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias y Alimentarias,
Carretera de la Coruña, Km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain (J.M., J.S.); and Departamento de Genética, Universidad de Valencia, 46100 Burjasot, Spain (M.B., J.T., M.P.-A.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have identified two genes from
Arabidopsis that show high similarity with
CBF1, a gene encoding an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the low-temperature-responsive element CCGAC and induces the expression of some cold-regulated genes,
increasing plant freezing tolerance. These two genes, which we have
named CBF2 and CBF3, also encode proteins
containing AP2 DNA-binding motifs. Furthermore, like CBF1, CBF2 and
CBF3 proteins also include putative nuclear-localization signals and
potential acidic activation domains. The CBF2 and
CBF3 genes are linked to CBF1,
constituting a cluster on the bottom arm of chromosome IV. The high
level of similarity among the three CBF genes, their tandem organization, and the fact that they have the same
transcriptional orientation all suggest a common origin.
CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 show
identical expression patterns, being induced very rapidly by
low-temperature treatment. However, in contrast to most of the
cold-induced plant genes characterized, they are not responsive to
abscisic acid or dehydration. Taken together, all of these data suggest
that CBF2 and CBF3 may function as
transcriptional activators, controlling the level of low-temperature
gene expression and promoting freezing tolerance through an abscisic
acid-independent pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Many plant species from temperate regions can increase their
freezing tolerance in response to low, nonfreezing temperatures (Levitt, 1980 ; Sakai and Larcher, 1987 ). This process, called cold
acclimation, involves several biochemical and physiological changes
that seem to be regulated through changes in gene expression (Thomashow, 1994 ). Genetic analyses revealed that multiple genes are
involved in cold acclimation (Thomashow, 1990 ), and a wide number of
genes whose transcript levels accumulate in response to low
temperatures have been isolated and characterized (Thomashow, 1994 ;
Hughes and Dunn, 1996 ; Capel et al., 1997 ; Gana et al., 1997 ; Hong et
al., 1997 ; Capel et al., 1998 ; Kiyosue et al., 1998 ; Urao et al.,
1998 ). However, the precise role that these genes play in the process
of cold acclimation remains to be determined.
During the past few years a major goal in the study of gene expression
induced by low temperature has been to determine the specific
cis-acting regulatory sequences. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and
Shinozaki (1994) first identified two 9-bp DNA elements in the promoter
of the Arabidopsis RD29A gene that activated gene expression
in response to low temperature and drought when fused to a reporter
gene. The two elements contained the low-temperature DRE core sequence
CCGAC, also named C-repeat by Thomashow and colleagues (Baker et al.,
1994 ). This sequence, hereafter referred to as LTRE, has been found to
be essential for the low-temperature responsiveness of other
cold-induced plant genes, including the Arabidopsis gene
COR15A (Baker et al., 1994 ), the Brassica napus gene BN115 (Jiang et al., 1996 ), and the wheat gene
WCS120 (Ouellet et al., 1998 ). Although many of the changes
in gene expression that occur during the process of cold acclimation
are mediated by ABA (Bray, 1993 ; Welin et al., 1994 ), the results of
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki (1994) revealed that the LTRE is not
responsive to ABA, suggesting that it imparts cold- and
dehydration-regulated gene expression through an ABA-independent
pathway.
A step toward increased understanding of the
molecular mechanisms that control cold acclimation and, therefore, how
low temperatures regulate gene expression was the isolation and
characterization of a cDNA from Arabidopsis encoding a
C-repeat/DRE/LTRE-binding protein, CBF1
(C-repeat/DRE-Binding Factor;
Stockinger et al., 1997 ). CBF1 was described as a single- or
low-copy-number gene, the expression levels of which did not change
appreciably in plants exposed to low temperatures or water stress. The
deduced CBF1 amino acid sequence indicated that the protein had in its
N-terminal region a potential nuclear localization sequence followed by
an AP2 DNA-binding motif and an acidic C-terminal half that might act
as an activator domain (Stockinger et al., 1997 ). Furthermore, expression analyses in yeast demonstrated that CBF1 could function as a
transcriptional activator, since it promoted the transcription of a
reporter gene containing the LTRE as an activator sequence. Recently,
Jagglo-Ottosen et al. (1998) showed that overexpression of
CBF1 in Arabidopsis transgenic plants induced the expression of some cold-regulated genes and increased freezing tolerance of
non-cold-acclimated, transformed plants. They concluded that CBF1 is a
positive regulator of the cold-acclimation process, controlling gene
expression and promoting freezing tolerance.
An interesting question raised from the results mentioned above is
whether Arabidopsis contains homologs of CBF1 or other genes
encoding LTRE-binding proteins. Here we describe the identification and
characterization of two Arabidopsis genes homologous to
CBF1. Both genes, which we have called CBF2 and
CBF3, are organized in tandem with CBF1 on
chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis and constitute a small gene family. Like
CBF1, both genes encode proteins containing putative nuclear
localization signals, AP2 DNA-binding motifs, and potential acidic
activation domains. We also show that expression of CBF1,
CBF2, and CBF3 is induced very early and in a
transient manner during the process of cold acclimation but is not
induced by ABA or dehydration treatments. Based on these results, we
suggest a potential role for CBF2 and CBF3 in
cold acclimation and freezing tolerance.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material and Treatments
Arabidopsis Heyhn. ecotype Columbia (Col) was purchased from Lehle
Seeds (Tucson, AZ). Four-week-old plants were used for all of the
experiments. Plants were grown at 22°C under long-day photoperiods
(16 h of cool-white fluorescent light, photon flux of 70 µmol
m 2 s 1) in
pots containing a mixture of perlite, vermiculite, and sphagnum (1:1:1), and irrigated with water and mineral nutrient solution (Haughn
and Somerville, 1986 ) once a week. Low-temperature treatments were
performed at 4°C for different periods under the same light and
photoperiodic conditions. For ABA treatments, plants were sprayed with
100 µM ABA and leaves were harvested 3 h
later. The ABA stock solution (1 mM) was prepared
in DMSO. Control plants were sprayed with water containing the same
final concentration of the ABA solvent. Water stress was induced by
transferring the plants to Petri dishes and allowing them to lose 50%
of their fresh weight. After the treatments, leaves were immediately
frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 80°C until their use.
Molecular Biology Methods
The Arabidopsis P1 genomic clone M7J2, corresponding to the bottom
arm of chromosome IV, was sequenced in-frame as part of the European
Arabidopsis Genome Sequencing Project. A shotgun library approach was
used to determine the DNA sequence of the insert (Povinelli and Gibbs,
1993 ; Anderson et al., 1994 ). The DNA sequence was obtained by using
the IR Taq DNA-sequencing kit (Boehringer Mannheim)
and an automated DNA sequencer (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE). Genomic DNA
extractions were carried out according to the method of Dellaporta et
al. (1983) . Total RNA was isolated from different plant organs
according to the method of Nagy et al. (1988) . Restriction digestions,
cloning, and DNA- and RNA-blot hybridizations were performed following
standard protocols (Sambrook et al., 1989 ).
For DNA- and RNA-blot hybridizations, DNA probes were radioactively
labeled with [ -32P]dCTP using the Megaprime
kit (Amersham). A 692-bp RsaI fragment from CBF2
and a 1124-bp HindIII fragment from CBF3
containing corresponding coding regions were cloned into pBluescript
and used as probes to simultaneously detect all members of the
CBF gene family. Alternatively, DNA fragments partially
encompassing the 3 -noncoding regions were used as gene-specific
probes. The CBF1-specific probe consisted of a 181-bp
PCR-amplified fragment containing 25 nucleotides of coding sequence and
156 nucleotides of 3 -noncoding region that was obtained by using the
primers 5 -GTGAAGCAAAGAAGTAGAAAACG-3 and 5 -GTGACGTGTCGCTTTGGAGTTAC-3 (Stockinger et al., 1997 ).
The specific probe for the CBF2 gene consisted of a 199-bp
PCR-amplified fragment produced by using the primers
5 -GCATTTAAGAATAGCCCACAC-3 and 5 -CGACGGCGATGATGACGACGT-3 . The
fragment had 40 nucleotides of coding sequence and 159 nucleotides of
3 -noncoding region. The CBF3-specific probe consisted
of a 227-bp PCR-amplified fragment covering 38 nucleotides of
coding sequence and 189 nucleotides of 3 -noncoding region. The
fragment was obtained by using the primers
5 -TATTTTGATTTGTTGCTTATGG-3 and 5 -TCGAGGGAGATGATGACGTGTCC-3 . In
addition, a 700-bp PCR-amplified fragment from the Arabidopsis KIN1 gene was also used as a probe (Kurkela and Frank,
1990). This fragment was produced by using the primers
5 -CCCGGATCCGGCACCACCACTCCCTTTAG-3 and 5 -GGGGAATTCGAATATAAGTTTGGCTCGTC-3. Finally, as an RNA-loading control,
a probe consisting of a 700-bp EcoRI-HindIII
fragment corresponding to the RBP4-coding region (Kim et
al., 1990 ) was used.
Databases were searched for sequence similarities using the Basic Local
Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program of the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (Altschul et al., 1997 ). A comparison of the
nucleotide and amino acid sequences was performed with the software
package PC/Gene 6.5 (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA).
Putative phosphorylation sites were identified by comparing the amino
acid sequences against all phosphorylation sites stored in the PROSITE
pattern database (Bairoch et al., 1997 ).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification and Characterization of CBF2 and
CBF3, Two Genes Homologous to CBF1
The sequence of the Arabidopsis genomic clone M7J2 included one
ORF, which, when compared with the databases, resulted in an identical
coding sequence to the CBF1 cDNA described by Stockinger et
al. (1997) . This clearly indicated that the CBF1 gene does not have introns interrupting its ORF. Two new ORFs that showed a high
degree of similarity to CBF1, 81% and 84%, were also
identified. These ORFs, which we named CBF2 (accession no.
AF062924) and CBF3 (accession no. AF062925), contained 651 nucleotides each that were 84% identical to each other. Furthermore,
when compared with CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3
did not appear to have any introns interrupting their ORFs.
CBF2 and CBF3 were located 3 and 7 kb downstream
of CBF1, respectively (Fig.
1A), suggesting that CBF1,
CBF2, and CBF3 constitute a small gene family
organized as a cluster on chromosome IV of Arabidopsis. A search for
additional CBF genes in the Arabidopsis genome was performed
by DNA-blot hybridization experiments under low-stringency conditions.
The probes used were DNA fragments containing CBF2- or
CBF3-coding sequences (Fig. 1B). The results obtained
revealed that both probes hybridized with the same restriction
fragments in each digestion, the only difference being their relative
intensities. Moreover, the number and molecular size of the fragments
recognized by both probes were in agreement with the CBF
gene organization shown in Figure 1A, indicating that no more
CBF-related genes are present in the genome of Arabidopsis.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
Genomic organization of the CBF1,
CBF2, and CBF3 genes. A, Physical map of
CBF genes on chromosome IV of Arabidopsis. The ORFs are
shown with open bars. The restriction sites are HindIII
(H), XbaI (X), and ScaI (S). The
direction of transcriptions is indicated by arrows. B, DNA-blot
hybridizations of Arabidopsis genomic DNA (4 µg) digested with
ScaI (S), NdeI (N), XbaI
(X), BglII (B), and HindIII (H). The
probes used were the 692-bp RsaI fragment from
CBF2 and the 1124-bp HindIII fragment
from CBF3, as described in ``Materials and Methods''.
The positions of molecular size markers are in the center.
|
|
Analysis of the 5 regions of CBF1, CBF2, and
CBF3 (Fig. 2) showed that
these regions also have a moderate level of similarity. In addition,
they showed the presence of sequences with similarity to known
regulatory sequences identified in other plant genes. Thus, the core
CANNTG consensus motif, as well as the CACGTC- and TACGTG-related
sequences, which are present in the promoter region of many genes that
are regulated by different environmental stresses and ABA (Guiltinan et
al., 1990 ; Williams et al., 1992 ; Busk and Pages, 1998 ), were found in
the promoters of the CBF genes. Furthermore, the pentamer
CAGCC, which corresponds to the LTRE core sequence (CCGAC) in reverse
orientation, was present in the CBF promoters. The sequence
CCGTC, which differs in only one nucleotide from the LTRE motif, was
also found in the 5 region of CBF1 (Fig. 2).

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
Alignment of the 5 upstream sequences of
CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3.
Six-hundred-eighty bases of the 5 -untranslated region of
CBF1 were aligned with 720 and 702 bases of the
corresponding regions of CBF2 and CBF3,
respectively. Asterisks indicate nucleotides identical to the
CBF1 sequence. Hyphens indicate gaps inserted in the
sequences for better alignment. The initiation ATGs and putative TATA
boxes (TATAAA) are double underlined. CANNTG motifs and related
sequences CACGTC and TACGTG are shown in gray boxes. Black boxes
highlight the CAGCC pentamers. The CCGTC sequence is single
underlined.
|
|
The coding regions of CBF2 and CBF3 encoded two
polypeptides of 216 amino acids each, with a predicted molecular mass
of 24 kD. The pIs for both polypeptides were low: 5.0 for CBF2 and 4.9 for CBF3. The amino acid alignment of CBF2 and CBF3 revealed that 76%
of the residues were identical and 85% were similar (Fig. 3A). When compared with CBF1, CBF2 and
CBF3 also showed a very high degree of similarity (84% and 86%,
respectively; Fig. 3A). Like CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 included in their
N-terminal regions basic residues that potentially represent nuclear
localization signals (Raikhel, 1992 ) and putative AP2 DNA-binding
domains (Weigel, 1995 ; Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1995 ). Comparison of
the AP2 domains from the CBF proteins and the Arabidopsis DNA-binding
protein AtEBP (Buttner and Singh, 1997 ) revealed high similarity (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, CBF2 and CBF3 also contained acidic C-terminal fragments (pIs of 3.8 and 3.6, respectively) that might act as transcriptional activation domains (Hahn, 1993 ). In addition, they
showed potential recognition sites for protein kinase C and casein
kinase II (Kennelly and Krebs, 1991 ). Some of these sites were
conserved among the three CBF polypeptides as Ser-13, Ser-56, which is
inside of the AP2 domain, and Thr-151 (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
Amino acid sequences of CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3
proteins. A, Sequence alignment. Amino acid residues identical to the
CBF1 sequence at a given position are indicated by asterisks. Points
represent gaps inserted in the sequences for better alignment. Black
box corresponds to the potential nuclear localization signals. Gray
boxes highlight the AP2 domains. Underlined amino acids indicate
potential recognition sites for protein kinase C ( ) and casein
kinase II ( ). B, Comparison of the AP2 domains from CBF1, CBF2, and
CBF3 proteins and the Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive element-binding
protein AtEBP (Bütner and Singh, 1997). Identical amino acids are
highlighted in black boxes. Points represent gaps inserted in the
sequences for better alignment. Residues belonging to the conserved AP2
domain elements YRG and RAYD (Okamuro et al., 1997 ) are indicated.
Amino acids in the RAYD conserved element predicted to form an
amphipatic -helix that might promote DNA binding (Okamuro et al.,
1997 ) are underlined.
|
|
The Expression of CBF1, CBF2, and
CBF3 Genes Is Specifically Induced by Low Temperature in
Different Organs of Arabidopsis
Although CBF1 was first described as not regulated by
low temperature (Stockinger et al., 1997 ), the fact that its
overexpression in transgenic plants induces the accumulation of some
cold-regulated transcripts (Jagglo-Ottosen et al., 1998 ) suggested that
its expression could be induced by low temperature. In addition,
the sequences found in the 5 regions of all of the CBF
genes that show similarity to regulatory elements (see above) supported
this assumption.
To analyze whether the expression of CBF genes is induced by
low temperature, total RNA was prepared from leaves of 4-week-old Arabidopsis plants exposed to 4°C for different periods. Considering the high similarity among the coding sequences of the three
CBF genes analyzed, CBF1-, CBF2-, and
CBF3-specific transcripts were identified by RNA-blot
hybridizations with specific probes prepared from DNA fragments
corresponding to their 3 -untranslated regions (see ``Materials and Methods''). DNA-blot hybridizations showed that each probe
hybridized with only a single restriction fragment in each digestion,
demonstrating that it specifically recognized the corresponding gene
(not shown). As shown in Figure 4,
CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 transcripts
accumulated with very similar kinetics in response to low
temperatures. An increase of CBF mRNA levels was already
detectable after 30 min of exposure to low temperature, reaching
maximal levels of accumulation after 1 h. This increase was
transient, since transcript levels decreased thereafter.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 4.
CBF1, CBF2, and
CBF3 transcripts accumulate in response to low
temperature but not in response to ABA or water stress. RNA-blot
hybridizations were performed with total RNA (10 µg per lane)
isolated from leaves exposed to 4°C for the indicated time, sprayed
with 100 µM ABA (A), sprayed with the ABA solvent (C), or
dehydrated until losing 50% of their fresh weight (D). The probes used
were the 3 fragments of CBF1, CBF2, and
CBF3 and the fragments of the KIN1 and
RBP4 genes described in ``Materials and Methods''.
|
|
To date, most characterized cold-regulated genes are also responsive to
ABA and water stress (Thomashow, 1994 ; Hughess and Dunn, 1996; Rouse et
al., 1996 ; Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 1996 ; Capel et al., 1997 ;
Hong et al., 1997 ; Kirch et al., 1997 ). To determine whether the
accumulation of CBF mRNAs was specifically regulated by low
temperature or was also responsive to these treatments, Arabidopsis
plants were either treated with 100 µM ABA or
dehydrated until losing 50% of their initial fresh weight. Total RNAs
isolated from these plants and from controls were used to perform
RNA-blot hybridizations with the CBF-specific probes
previously described. Figure 4 shows that CBF transcripts
did not accumulate in response to ABA or dehydration, indicating that
the expression of CBF genes is specifically regulated by low
temperature. As positive controls for treatments and RNA loading,
hybridizations with KIN1 and RBP4 probes were
carried out, respectively (Fig. 4). The KIN1 probe recognizes a gene from Arabidopsis, the expression of which is induced
by low temperature, ABA, and dehydration treatments (Kurkela and
Franck, 1990 ), whereas the RBP4 probe recognizes an
Arabidopsis gene that is expressed constitutively (Kim et al., 1990 ).
The accumulation of CBF mRNAs in different organs of
Arabidopsis in response to low temperature was studied in total RNA
isolated from leaves, stems, and roots of plants exposed to 4°C for
1 h. As controls, RNAs from the same organs of plants grown at
20°C were also isolated. RNA-blot hybridizations were performed with the CBF-specific probes used in previous experiments. The
results obtained revealed that, in response to low temperature,
CBF transcripts accumulated to similar levels in all organs
analyzed (Fig. 5). To monitor RNA
loading, hybridizations with the RBP4 probe (see above) were
carried out with the same membranes.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 5.
Accumulation of CBF1,
CBF2, and CBF3 transcripts in different
organs of Arabidopsis in response to low temperature. RNA-blot
hybridizations were carried out with total RNA (15 µg per lane)
isolated from leaves, stems, and roots of plants grown at 22°C (C) or
exposed to 4°C for 1 h (4°). The specific probes for the
CBF genes and the probe used for RBP4 are
described in ``Materials and Methods''.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A significant step toward understanding the molecular mechanisms
that control the process of cold acclimation was the recent isolation
of a cDNA corresponding to Arabidopsis CBF1, the first identified
C-repeat/DRE/LTRE-binding factor (Stockinger et al., 1997 ). Here we
present the identification and characterization of two novel
Arabidopsis genes, CBF2 and CBF3, both of which
are highly similar to CBF1. Furthermore, we demonstrate that
the expression of all three CBF genes is regulated by low
temperature.
Genomic sequence analyses indicated that CBF1,
CBF2, and CBF3 do not show introns among their
coding sequences and are organized in tandem on chromosome 4 of
Arabidopsis. The high similarity existing among CBF1,
CBF2, and CBF3, together with their close linkage
and the fact that they have the same transcriptional orientation, clearly suggests a common origin, probably by two consecutive duplications of an ancestral gene and subsequent divergence through mutations. It is interesting that the same origin has been proposed for
the members of five families of low-temperature-responsive genes from
Arabidopsis, in which the homologous genes are arranged in tandem in
the genome (Nordin et al., 1991 ; Gilmour et al., 1992 ; Kurkela and
Borg-Franck, 1992 ; Horvath et al., 1993 ; Wilhelm and Thomashow, 1993 ;
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 1993 ; Welin et al., 1994 ; Capel et
al., 1997 ). However, the reason that low-temperature-regulated genes
are so frequently organized in tandem remains unknown.
The 5 regulatory sequences of CBF1, CBF2, and
CBF3 have diverged more than the coding regions but still
keep a high level of similarity, which may result in the identical
expression patterns shown by these genes. The fact that
CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 are not responsive to ABA seems to indicate that the CANNTG sequence, repeated
several times in their upstream regions, is not sufficient to confer
ABA responsiveness in the context of CBF promoters. The
consensus LTRE core sequence, CCGAC, which has been reported to be
essential for the low-temperature responsiveness of several genes
(Baker et al., 1994 ; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki 1994 ; Jiang et
al., 1996 ; Ouellet et al., 1998 ), is not found in the CBF
promoters. Only the variant CCGTC, which differs in just one nucleotide
from the LTRE, is present in the 5 region of CBF1. Whether
this sequence can confer the low-temperature response remains to be
seen. However, it is interesting to emphasize that the pentamer CAGCC,
which is the LTRE core sequence in reverse orientation, is present in
the promoters of all CBFs.
CBF2 and CBF3 polypeptides contain a 60-amino acid motif, the AP2
domain, that is evolutionarily conserved in plants (Okamuro et al.,
1997 ) and has been described as a DNA-binding domain (Ohme-Takagi and
Shinshi, 1995 ; Weigel, 1995 ). CBF2 and CBF3, like CBF1, also have
potential nuclear localization sequences in their N-terminal regions
and acidic C-terminal fragments. Moreover, CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 show
potential recognition sites for protein kinase C and casein kinase II.
Some of these sites are conserved among the three proteins, and one of
them, Ser-56, is located in the AP2 domain. Recently, Vazquez-Tello et
al. (1998) proposed that the expression of WCS120, a
low-temperature-inducible gene from wheat that contains two LTREs in
its promoter region, may be regulated by nuclear factors whose binding
activity is modulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation mechanisms.
We speculate that the potential phosphorylation sites found in
the CBF proteins may play an important role in their functions.
Expression analyses revealed that CBF2 and CBF3
are positively regulated by low temperature. Furthermore, in contrast
to previous data (Stockinger et al., 1997 ), CBF1 transcripts
also accumulated in response to low temperature in our experimental
conditions. The cold-inducible expression of CBF genes does
not show marked differences. It is not organ specific, since CBF mRNAs
accumulate to similar levels in different organs of Arabidopsis, and is
transiently regulated. The accumulation of CBF transcripts
increases rapidly after plants are transferred to low-temperature
conditions, reaching the highest levels after 1 h of exposure and
decreasing thereafter. This expression pattern suggests that
CBF genes should be involved in responses that are
transiently produced when plants are exposed to low temperatures, and
fits with the notion that their induction should be an early
amplification event in the low-temperature-induced signaling cascade,
preceding and prompting the accumulation of transcripts corresponding
to CBF-regulated genes. On the other hand, the expression of
CBF genes is not regulated by ABA treatment or water stress,
two conditions that have been shown to increase plant freezing
tolerance (Cloutier and Siminovitch, 1982 ; Chen and Gusta, 1983 ;
Mäntylä et al., 1995 ) and induce the expression of most
cold-inducible genes (Thomashow, 1994 ; Hughes and Dunn, 1996 ; Rouse et
al., 1996 ; Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 1996 ; Capel et al., 1997 ;
Hong et al., 1997 ; Kirch et al., 1997 ).
CBF1 has been described as a transcriptional activator that binds to
the LTRE sequence, inducing the expression of some low-temperature genes and increasing freezing tolerance (Stockinger et al., 1997 ; Jagglo-Ottosen et al., 1998 ). Our data indicate that CBF2
and CBF3 have a high degree of homology with CBF1
(>84%) and show an identical expression pattern. This strongly
suggests that they may fulfill a similar function as CBF1,
controlling the level of low-temperature-regulated gene expression and
promoting freezing tolerance. The fact that CBF genes are
not responsive to ABA indicates that they should be involved in
regulating the expression of low-temperature-inducible genes through an
ABA-independent pathway. Moreover, taking into consideration that LTRE
is able to confer response to dehydration (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and
Shinozaki, 1994 ), the fact that the expression of CBF genes
is not induced by this stress suggests that LTRE-binding proteins other
than CBFs should mediate dehydration-regulated gene
expression through LTREs.
Recently, the isolation and characterization of five Arabidopsis cDNAs
encoding LTRE-binding proteins have been reported (Liu et al., 1998 ).
Three of these proteins, designated DREB1A, DREB1B, and DREB1C,
correspond to CBF2, CBF1, and CBF3, respectively. The other two
proteins, named DREB2A and DREB2B, also contain AP2 DNA-binding
domains, basic residues in their N-terminal regions that might function
as nuclear localization signals, and acidic C-terminal regions that
might act as transcriptional activation domains. Transactivation
experiments using Arabidopsis protoplasts from leaves revealed that
CBF2 (DREB1A) and DREB2A proteins can function as transcriptional
activators. Furthermore, overexpression of CBF2
(DREB1A) cDNA resulted in transgenic plants showing strong expression of the target genes under unstressed conditions, an increase
in tolerance to freezing and dehydration, and a dwarfed phenotype. In
contrast, transgenic plants overexpressing DREB2A cDNA
revealed few phenotypic changes and showed weak expression of the
target genes under unstressed conditions. It is interesting that the
expression of the DREB2A and DREB2B genes seems
to be strongly induced in leaves by dehydration and high-salt stress, but not by low temperature, as with the CBF
(DREB1) genes. All of these results confirm that, like CBF1,
CBF2 and CBF3 are trans-acting factors that regulate
low-temperature-induced gene expression promoting freezing
tolerance. The results also show that DREB2 is an independent family of
LTRE-binding proteins that function in a separate signal transduction
pathway under dehydration conditions.
Considering the large number of genes whose expression is induced in
response to low temperature, we hypothesized that differences in the
sequences of the CCGAC core element and/or in the sequences that
surround it may result in the recruitment of distinct CBF proteins. A
similar situation has been described for the G-box sequence CANNTG and
the bZIP proteins (Williams et al., 1992 ). The availability of all
CBF genes makes it possible to perform in vivo and in vitro
experiments to test this hypothesis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
1
This work was supported by research contract no.
BIO-CT96-0101 from the European Union to J.S.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail salinas{at}inia.es; fax
34-91- 357-3107.
Received July 29, 1998;
accepted November 5, 1998.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
Abbreviations:
DRE, drought-responsive element.
LTRE, low-temperature-responsive element.
ORF, open reading frame.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Dr. G. Salcedo and Dr. J.J. Sánchez-Serrano for
critically reading the manuscript. We are grateful to E. Rodríguez and A. Redondo for their technical assistance with
growing plants.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
Altschul SF,
Madden TL,
Schaffer AA,
Zhang J,
Zhang Z,
Miller W,
Lipman DJ
(1997)
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.
Nucleic Acids Res
25:
3389-3402
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Anderson B,
Povinelli CM,
Wentland MA,
Shen Y,
Muzny DM,
Gibbs RA
(1994)
Adaptor-based uracil glycosylase cloning simplifies shotgun library construction for large-scale sequencing.
Anal Biochem
218:
300-308
[CrossRef][Medline]
Bairoch A,
Bucher P,
Hofmann K
(1997)
The PROSITE database, its status in 1997.
Nucleic Acids Res
25:
217-221
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Baker SS,
Wilhelm KS,
Thomashow MF
(1994)
The 5 -region of Arabidopsis thaliana cor15a has cis-acting elements that confer cold-, drought- and ABA-regulated gene expression.
Plant Mol Biol
24:
701-713
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bray EA
(1993)
Molecular responses to water deficit.
Plant Physiol
103:
1035-1040
[Web of Science][Medline]
Busk KP,
Pages M
(1998)
Regulation of abscisic acid-induced transcription.
Plant Mol Biol
37:
425-435
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Buttner M,
Singh KB
(1997)
Arabidopsis thaliana ethylene-responsive element binding protein (AtEBP), an ethylene-inducible, GCC box DNA-binding protein interacts with an ocs element binding protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
5961-5966
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Capel J,
Jarillo JA,
Madueño F,
Jorquera MJ,
Martinez-Zapater JM,
Salinas J
(1998)
Low temperature regulates Arabidopsis Lhcb gene expression in a light-independent manner.
Plant J
13:
411-418
[Medline]
Capel J,
Jarillo JA,
Salinas J,
Martinez-Zapater JM
(1997)
Two homologous low-temperature-inducible genes from Arabidopsis encode highly hydrophobic proteins.
Plant Physiol
2:
569-576
Chen THH,
Gusta LV
(1983)
Abscisic acid induced freezing resistance in cultured plant cells.
Plant Physiol
73:
71-75
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Cloutier Y,
Siminovitch D
(1982)
Correlation between cold- and drought-induced frost hardiness in winter wheat and rye varieties.
Plant Physiol
69:
256-258
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Dellaporta SL,
Wood J,
Hicks JB
(1983)
A plant DNA minipreparation: version II.
Plant Mol Biol Rep
l:
19-21
Gana JA,
Sutton F,
Kenefick DG
(1997)
cDNA structure and expression patterns of a low-temperature-specific wheat gene tacr7.
Plant Mol Biol
4:
643-650
Gilmour SJ,
Artus NN,
Thomashow MF
(1992)
Plant Mol Biol
18:
13-21
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Guiltinan MJ,
Marcotte WR,
Quatrano RS
(1990)
A plant leucine zipper protein that recognizes an abscisic responsive element.
Science
250:
267-271
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hahn S
(1993)
Structure and function of acidic transcription activators.
Cell
72:
481-483
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Haughn G,
Somerville C
(1986)
Mol Gen Genet
204:
430-434
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hong SW,
Jon JH,
Kwak JM,
Nam HG
(1997)
Identification of a receptor-like protein kinase gene rapidly induced by abscisic acid, dehydration, high salt, and cold treatments in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Physiol
4:
1203-1212
Horvath DP,
McLarney BK,
Thomashow MF
(1993)
Regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Heyn) cor78 in response to low temperature.
Plant Physiol
103:
1047-1053
[Abstract]
Hughes MA,
Dunn MA
(1996)
The molecular biology of plant acclimation to low temperature.
J Exp Bot
47:
291-305
Jagglo-Ottosen KR,
Gilmour SJ,
Zarka DG,
Schabenberger O,
Thomashow MF
(1998)
Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance.
Science
280:
104-106
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Jiang C,
Iu B,
Singh J
(1996)
Requirement of a CCGAC cis-acting element for cold induction of the BN115 gene from winter Brassica napus.
Plant Mol Biol
30:
679-684
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kennelly PJ,
Krebs EG
(1991)
Consensus sequences as substrate specificity determinants for protein kinases and protein phosphatases.
J Biol Chem
266:
15555-15558
[Free Full Text]
Kim Y,
Zhang H,
Scholl RL
(1990)
Two evolutionary divergent genes encode a cytoplasmic ribosomal protein of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Gene
93:
177-182
[Medline]
Kirch HH,
van Berkel J,
Glaczinski H,
Salamini F,
Gebhardt C
(1997)
Structural organization, expression and promoter activity of a cold-stress-inducible gene of potato.
Plant Mol Biol
5:
897-909
Kiyosue T,
Abe H,
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K,
Shinozaki K
(1998)
ERD6, a cDNA clone for an early dehydration-induced gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a putative sugar transporter.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1370:
187-191
[Medline]
Kurkela S,
Borg-Franck M
(1992)
Plant Mol Biol
19:
689-692
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kurkela S,
Franck M
(1990)
Cloning and characterization of a cold- and ABA induced Arabidopsis gene.
Plant Mol Biol
15:
137-144
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Levitt J (1980) Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses:
Chilling, Freezing and High Temperature Stresses. Academic Press, New
York
Liu Q,
Kasuga M,
Sakuma Y,
Abe H,
Miura S,
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K,
Shinozaki K
(1998)
Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
10:
1391-1406
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Mäntylä E,
Lang V,
Palva T
(1995)
Plant Physiol
107:
141-148
[Abstract]
Nagy F,
Kay SA,
Chua N-H
(1988)
Analysis of gene expression in transgenic plants.
In
SB Gelvin,
RA Schilperoort,
eds, Plant Molecular Biology Manual.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1-29
Nordin K,
Heino P,
Palva ET
(1991)
Separate signal pathways regulate the expression of a low-temperature-induced gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.
Plant Mol Biol
187:
169-183
Ohme-Takagi M,
Shinshi H
(1995)
Ethylene-inducible DNA binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element.
Plant Cell
7:
173-182
[Abstract]
Okamuro JK,
Caster B,
Villarroel R,
Van Montagu M,
Jofuku DK
(1997)
The AP2 domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
13:
7076-7081
Ouellet F,
Vazquez-Tello A,
Sarhan F
(1998)
The wheat wcs120 promoter is cold-inducible in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species.
FEBS Lett
423:
324-328
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Povinelli CM,
Gibbs RA
(1993)
Large-scale sequencing library production: an adaptor-based strategy.
Anal Biochem
210:
16-26
[CrossRef][Medline]
Raikhel N
(1992)
Nuclear targeting in plants.
Plant Physiol
100:
1627-1632
[Free Full Text]
Rouse DT,
Marotta R,
Parish RW
(1996)
Promoter and expression studies on an Arabidopsis thaliana dehydrin gene.
FEBS Lett
3:
252-256
Sakai A, Larcher W (1987) Frost survival of plants. In
Responses and Adaptation to Freezing Stress. Springer-Verlag,
New York
Sambrook J,
Fritsch EF,
Maniatis T
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Shinozaki K,
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K
(1996)
Molecular responses to drought and cold stress.
Curr Opin Biotechnol
7:
161-167
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Stockinger EJ,
Gilmour SJ,
Thomashow MF
(1997)
Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
1035-1040
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Thomashow MF
(1990)
Molecular genetics of cold acclimation in higher plants.
Adv Gene
28:
99-131
Thomashow MF
(1994)
Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for studying mechanisms of plant cold tolerance.
In
EM Meyerowitz,
CR Somerville,
eds, Arabidopsis.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 807-834
Urao T, Yakubov B, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1998)
Stress-responsive expression of genes for two-component response
regulator-like proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett
427: 175-178
Vazquez-Tello A,
Ouellet F,
Sarhan F
(1998)
Low temperature-stimulated phosphorylation regulates the binding of nuclear factors to the promoter of Wcs120, a cold-specific gene in wheat.
Mol Gen Genet
257:
157-166
[CrossRef][Medline]
Weigel D
(1995)
The APETALA2 domain is related to a novel type of DNA binding domain.
Plant Cell
7:
388-389
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Welin BV,
Olson A,
Nylander M,
Palva ET
(1994)
Plant Mol Biol
26:
131-144
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wilhelm K,
Thomashow MF
(1993)
Arabidopsis thaliana cor l5b, an apparent homologue of cor l5a, is strongly responsive to cold and ABA, but not drought.
Plant Mol Biol
23:
1073-1077
[CrossRef][Medline]
Williams ME,
Foster R,
Chua NH
(1992)
Sequences flanking the hexameric G-box core CACGTG affect the specificity of protein binding.
Plant Cell
4:
485-496
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K,
Shinozaki K
(1993)
Characterization of the expression of a desiccation-responsive rd29 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana and analysis of its promoter in transgenic plants.
Mol Gen Genet
236:
331-340
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K,
Shinozaki K
(1994)
A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low-temperature or high-salt stress.
Plant Cell
6:
251-264
[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-H. Kim, K. Sasaki, and R. Imai
Cold Shock Domain Protein 3 Regulates Freezing Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 28, 2009;
284(35):
23454 - 23460.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Navarro, G. Marque, C. Ayax, G. Keller, J. P. Borges, C. Marque, and C. Teulieres
Complementary regulation of four Eucalyptus CBF genes under various cold conditions
J. Exp. Bot.,
July 1, 2009;
60(9):
2713 - 2724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-H. Dong, B. K. Zolman, B. Bartel, B.-h. Lee, B. Stevenson, M. Agarwal, and J.-K. Zhu
Disruption of Arabidopsis CHY1 Reveals an Important Role of Metabolic Status in Plant Cold Stress Signaling
Mol Plant,
January 1, 2009;
2(1):
59 - 72.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Badawi, Y. V. Reddy, Z. Agharbaoui, Y. Tominaga, J. Danyluk, F. Sarhan, and M. Houde
Structure and Functional Analysis of Wheat ICE (Inducer of CBF Expression) Genes
Plant Cell Physiol.,
August 1, 2008;
49(8):
1237 - 1249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Welling and E. T. Palva
Involvement of CBF Transcription Factors in Winter Hardiness in Birch
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2008;
147(3):
1199 - 1211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sun, J.-P. Yu, F. Chen, T.-J. Zhao, X.-H. Fang, Y.-Q. Li, and S.-F. Sui
TINY, a Dehydration-responsive Element (DRE)-binding Protein-like Transcription Factor Connecting the DRE- and Ethylene-responsive Element-mediated Signaling Pathways in Arabidopsis
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2008;
283(10):
6261 - 6271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Novillo, J. Medina, and J. Salinas
Arabidopsis CBF1 and CBF3 have a different function than CBF2 in cold acclimation and define different gene classes in the CBF regulon
PNAS,
December 26, 2007;
104(52):
21002 - 21007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-H. Dong, X. Hu, W. Tang, X. Zheng, Y. S. Kim, B.-h. Lee, and J.-K. Zhu
A Putative Arabidopsis Nucleoporin, AtNUP160, Is Critical for RNA Export and Required for Plant Tolerance to Cold Stress
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2006;
26(24):
9533 - 9543.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. El Kayal, M. Navarro, G. Marque, G. Keller, C. Marque, and C. Teulieres
Expression profile of CBF-like transcriptional factor genes from Eucalyptus in response to cold
J. Exp. Bot.,
July 1, 2006;
57(10):
2455 - 2469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-H. Dong, M. Agarwal, Y. Zhang, Q. Xie, and J.-K. Zhu
The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1
PNAS,
May 23, 2006;
103(21):
8281 - 8286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-J. Zhao, S. Sun, Y. Liu, J.-M. Liu, Q. Liu, Y.-B. Yan, and H.-M. Zhou
Regulating the Drought-responsive Element (DRE)-mediated Signaling Pathway by Synergic Functions of Trans-active and Trans-inactive DRE Binding Factors in Brassica napus
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 21, 2006;
281(16):
10752 - 10759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B.-h. Lee, D. A. Henderson, and J.-K. Zhu
The Arabidopsis Cold-Responsive Transcriptome and Its Regulation by ICE1
PLANT CELL,
November 1, 2005;
17(11):
3155 - 3175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Alonso-Blanco, C. Gomez-Mena, F. Llorente, M. Koornneef, J. Salinas, and J. M. Martinez-Zapater
Genetic and Molecular Analyses of Natural Variation Indicate CBF2 as a Candidate Gene for Underlying a Freezing Tolerance Quantitative Trait Locus in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2005;
139(3):
1304 - 1312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. V. Savitch, G. Allard, M. Seki, L. S. Robert, N. A. Tinker, N. P. A. Huner, K. Shinozaki, and J. Singh
The Effect of Overexpression of Two Brassica CBF/DREB1-like Transcription Factors on Photosynthetic Capacity and Freezing Tolerance in Brassica napus
Plant Cell Physiol.,
September 1, 2005;
46(9):
1525 - 1539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. C. M. Hettiarachchi, M. K. Reddy, S. K. Sopory, and S. Chattopadhyay
Regulation of TOP2 by Various Abiotic Stresses Including Cold and Salinity in Pea and Transgenic Tobacco Plants
Plant Cell Physiol.,
July 1, 2005;
46(7):
1154 - 1160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Fowler, D. Cook, and M. F. Thomashow
Low Temperature Induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 Is Gated by the Circadian Clock
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2005;
137(3):
961 - 968.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Buchanan, P. E. Klein, and J. E. Mullet
Phylogenetic Analysis of 5'-Noncoding Regions From the ABA-Responsive rab16/17 Gene Family of Sorghum, Maize and Rice Provides Insight Into the Composition, Organization and Function of cis-Regulatory Modules
Genetics,
November 1, 2004;
168(3):
1639 - 1654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Cook, S. Fowler, O. Fiehn, and M. F. Thomashow
From The Cover: A prominent role for the CBF cold response pathway in configuring the low-temperature metabolome of Arabidopsis
PNAS,
October 19, 2004;
101(42):
15243 - 15248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Knight, D. G. Zarka, H. Okamoto, M. F. Thomashow, and M. R. Knight
Abscisic Acid Induces CBF Gene Transcription and Subsequent Induction of Cold-Regulated Genes via the CRT Promoter Element
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2004;
135(3):
1710 - 1717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zhu, H. Shi, B.-h. Lee, B. Damsz, S. Cheng, V. Stirm, J.-K. Zhu, P. M. Hasegawa, and R. A. Bressan
An Arabidopsis homeodomain transcription factor gene, HOS9, mediates cold tolerance through a CBF-independent pathway
PNAS,
June 29, 2004;
101(26):
9873 - 9878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Novillo, J. M. Alonso, J. R. Ecker, and J. Salinas
CBF2/DREB1C is a negative regulator of CBF1/DREB1B and CBF3/DREB1A expression and plays a central role in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis
PNAS,
March 16, 2004;
101(11):
3985 - 3990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Catala, E. Santos, J. M. Alonso, J. R. Ecker, J. M. Martinez-Zapater, and J. Salinas
Mutations in the Ca2+/H+ Transporter CAX1 Increase CBF/DREB1 Expression and the Cold-Acclimation Response in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
December 1, 2003;
15(12):
2940 - 2951.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Zarka, J. T. Vogel, D. Cook, and M. F. Thomashow
Cold Induction of Arabidopsis CBF Genes Involves Multiple ICE (Inducer of CBF Expression) Promoter Elements and a Cold-Regulatory Circuit That Is Desensitized by Low Temperature
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2003;
133(2):
910 - 918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. T.S. Nogueira, V. E. De Rosa Jr., M. Menossi, E. C. Ulian, and P. Arruda
RNA Expression Profiles and Data Mining of Sugarcane Response to Low Temperature
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2003;
132(4):
1811 - 1824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Abdrakhamanova, Q. Y. Wang, L. Khokhlova, and P. Nick
Is Microtubule Disassembly a Trigger for Cold Acclimation?
Plant Cell Physiol.,
July 15, 2003;
44(7):
676 - 686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Brown, K. Kazan, K. C. McGrath, D. J. Maclean, and J. M. Manners
A Role for the GCC-Box in Jasmonate-Mediated Activation of the PDF1.2 Gene of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2003;
132(2):
1020 - 1032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Haake, D. Cook, J. L. Riechmann, O. Pineda, M. F. Thomashow, and J. Z. Zhang
Transcription Factor CBF4 Is a Regulator of Drought Adaptation in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2002;
130(2):
639 - 648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-H. Hsieh, J.-T. Lee, P.-T. Yang, L.-H. Chiu, Y.-y. Charng, Y.-C. Wang, and M.-T. Chan
Heterology Expression of the Arabidopsis C-Repeat/Dehydration Response Element Binding Factor 1 Gene Confers Elevated Tolerance to Chilling and Oxidative Stresses in Transgenic Tomato
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2002;
129(3):
1086 - 1094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Xiong, K. S. Schumaker, and J.-K. Zhu
Cell Signaling during Cold, Drought, and Salt Stress
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2002;
14(90001):
S165 - 183.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Chen, N. J. Provart, J. Glazebrook, F. Katagiri, H.-S. Chang, T. Eulgem, F. Mauch, S. Luan, G. Zou, S. A. Whitham, et al.
Expression Profile Matrix of Arabidopsis Transcription Factor Genes Suggests Their Putative Functions in Response to Environmental Stresses
PLANT CELL,
March 1, 2002;
14(3):
559 - 574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Y. Wang and P. Nick
Cold Acclimation Can Induce Microtubular Cold Stability in a Manner Distinct from Abscisic Acid
Plant Cell Physiol.,
September 1, 2001;
42(9):
999 - 1005.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Xiong, B.-h. Lee, M. Ishitani, H. Lee, C. Zhang, and J.-K. Zhu
FIERY1 encoding an inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase is a negative regulator of abscisic acid and stress signaling in Arabidopsis
Genes & Dev.,
August 1, 2001;
15(15):
1971 - 1984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lee, L. Xiong, Z. Gong, M. Ishitani, B. Stevenson, and J.-K. Zhu
The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning
Genes & Dev.,
April 1, 2001;
15(7):
912 - 924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Medina, R. Catalá, and J. Salinas
Developmental and Stress Regulation of RCI2A and RCI2B, Two Cold-Inducible Genes of Arabidopsis Encoding Highly Conserved Hydrophobic Proteins
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2001;
125(4):
1655 - 1666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y. Fujimoto, M. Ohta, A. Usui, H. Shinshi, and M. Ohme-Takagi
Arabidopsis Ethylene-Responsive Element Binding Factors Act as Transcriptional Activators or Repressors of GCC Box-Mediated Gene Expression
PLANT CELL,
March 1, 2000;
12(3):
393 - 404.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kanaya, N. Nakajima, K. Morikawa, K. Okada, and Y. Shimura
Characterization of the Transcriptional Activator CBF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. EVIDENCE FOR COLD DENATURATION IN REGIONS OUTSIDE OF THE DNA BINDING DOMAIN
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 4, 1999;
274(23):
16068 - 16076.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|