|
Plant Physiol. (1999) 119: 829-838
NADH-Glutamate Synthase in Alfalfa Root Nodules.
Immunocytochemical Localization1
Gian B. Trepp,
David W. Plank,
J. Stephen Gantt, and
Carroll P. Vance*
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften Eidgenössische
Technische Hochschule-Zürich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland (G.B.T.); Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics (G.B.T., D.W.P., C.P.V) and
Department of Plant Biology (J.S.G.), University of Minnesota, St.
Paul, Minnesota 55108; and University of Minnesota, St.
Paul, Minnesota 55108United States Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service, Plant Science Research Unit, University
of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (C.P.V.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
In root nodules of alfalfa
(Medicago sativa L.), N2 is reduced to
NH4+ in the bacteroid by the nitrogenase enzyme
and then released into the plant cytosol. The
NH4+ is then assimilated by the combined action
of glutamine synthetase (EC 6.3.1.2) and NADH-dependent Glu synthase
(NADH-GOGAT; EC 1.4.1.14) into glutamine and Glu. The alfalfa nodule
NADH-GOGAT protein has a 101-amino acid presequence, but the
subcellular location of the protein is unknown. Using
immunocytochemical localization, we determined first that the
NADH-GOGAT protein is found throughout the infected cell region of both
19- and 33-d-old nodules. Second, in alfalfa root nodules NADH-GOGAT is
localized predominantly to the amyloplast of infected cells. This
finding, together with earlier localization and fractionation studies,
indicates that in alfalfa the infected cells are the main location for
the initial assimilation of fixed N2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
N is an essential element for plant growth and development
(Greenwood, 1982 ). Plants acquire N from the soil in the form of NO3 and
NH4+ and from the atmosphere
through symbiotic N2 fixation. Irrespective of
its source, N must be reduced to NH4+ to become
available for the synthesis of amino acids and other N-containing plant
compounds (Lea et al., 1990 ; Temple et al., 1998b ).
In higher plants ammonia is assimilated by the combined action of GS
(EC 6.3.1.2) and GOGAT (Temple et al., 1998b ). The activities of these
two enzymes are interdependent, and they constitute the GS/GOGAT cycle
(Lea et al., 1990 ). The reaction catalyzed by GS involves the
ATP-dependent amination of Glu to yield Gln. GOGAT catalyzes the
reductive transfer of the amido group of Gln to the -keto position
of 2-oxoglutarate, yielding two molecules of Glu (Boland and Benny,
1977 ; Lea et al., 1990 ). GOGAT, together with GS, maintains the flow of
N from NH4+ into Gln and Glu. These products
are then used by several aminotransferase reactions in the synthesis of
amino acids (Lea et al., 1990 ). In higher plants GOGAT occurs as two
distinct forms, using either Fd or NADH as a reductant (Suzuki and
Gadal, 1984 ; Lea et al., 1990 ). In addition to reductant specificity,
the enzymes differ in molecular mass, kinetics, and antigenicity
(Temple et al., 1998b ). Fd-GOGAT (EC 1.4.7.1) is localized in the
chloroplast, where it is thought to be mainly involved in the
reassimilation of ammonia derived from photorespiration (Lea et al.,
1990 ; Temple et al., 1998b ). The monomeric enzyme is suggested to be an
Fe-S protein, with a molecular mass of 140 to 160 kD (Hirasawa and Tamura, 1984 ; Knauff et al., 1991 ). In contrast, NADH-GOGAT (EC 1.4.1.14) is predominantly active in nongreen tissue (Lea et al., 1990 ;
Temple et al., 1998b ). The plant NADH-GOGAT is a monomer with a
molecular mass of about 200 to 240 kD (Chen and Cullimore, 1988 ;
Anderson et al., 1989 ; Lea et al., 1990 ; Temple et al., 1998b ).
In root nodules N2 is reduced to
NH4+ in the bacteroids by the
enzyme nitrogenase (EC 1.18.6.1) and is then released into the plant
cytosol. The distribution of N assimilatory enzymes in root nodules is
complex and related to the type of nitrogenous compounds that are
transported from the nodules. In ureide transporters such as soybean
and cowpea, cytosolic and plastid enzymes of the infected cells as well
as peroxisomes and ER of uninfected cells are involved in N
assimilation (Boland et al., 1982 ; Shelp et al., 1983 ; Van den Bosch
and Newcomb, 1986). In amide transporters such as alfalfa and clover,
immunogold localization studies indicate that AAT-2 (EC 2.6.1.1) is
localized predominantly in the plastids of infected cells (Robinson et
al., 1994 ), whereas PEP carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.31) is uniformly
localized in the cytosol of both infected and uninfected cells
(Robinson et al., 1996 ). Fractionation studies and immunogold
localization indicate that GS and AS (EC 6.3.5.4) are both cytosolic
enzymes (Shelp and Atkins, 1984 ; Brangeon et al., 1989 ; Forde et al.,
1989 ; Datta et al., 1990 ). On the other hand, the
cellular localization of NADH-GOGAT remains unclear. Although some
authors suggest a cytosolic localization of the enzyme (Hecht et al.,
1988 ), most fractionation studies suggest plastid localization (Boland
et al., 1982 ; Shelp and Atkins, 1984 ; Chen and Cullimore, 1989 ).
Alfalfa root nodule NADH-GOGAT contains a 101-amino acid presequence
(Gregerson et al., 1993 ). The presequence analysis program P-Sort
indicates that this presequence targets the protein to the ER (Nakai
and Kaneshisa, 1992 ), but, based on the criteria of von Heijne et al.
(1989) , the presequence suggests mitochondrial or plastid localization.
In root nodules kinetic studies point toward the idea that NADH-GOGAT
catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the primary assimilation of ammonia
(Boland et al., 1980 ; Chen and Cullimore, 1988 ). This hypothesis is
further supported by molecular data. In contrast to the high protein
and transcript levels of enzymes involved in C and N metabolism, e.g.
GS1, AAT-2, AS, and PEP carboxylase, the level of
NADH-GOGAT protein and transcript are several times lower (Vance and
Gantt, 1992 ; Vance et al., 1994 ). Moreover, NADH-GOGAT is the major
form of GOGAT in this tissue, and enhanced expression in root nodules
is restricted to effective nodulation (Gregerson et al., 1993 ; Vance et
al., 1995 ). In 33-d-old nodules NADH-GOGAT transcript is localized in
the distal part of the N2-fixing zone in a 5- to
15-cell-wide area similar to the distribution pattern of the
nifH transcript (Trepp et al., 1999 ). These results indicate a close relationship between N2 fixation and
NADH-GOGAT expression.
The objective of this study was to determine the subcellular
localization of the NADH-GOGAT protein in alfalfa root nodule cells
using both light and electron microscopy coupled to
immunocytochemistry.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material and Bacterial Strains
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. cv Saranac) seeds were
obtained from Dr. J.F.S. Lamb (U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN). Plants were maintained in
greenhouse sand benches and inoculated with effective
Sinorhizobium meliloti 102F51 as described by Egli et al.
(1989) . For all studies the planting date was designated as d 0. At 19 and 33 d after planting and inoculation, the first two nodules
from the main root were fixed and embedded for use in both the
immunocytochemical and the immunogold localization.
Expression of a NADH-GOGAT Polypeptide
An 886-bp PstI-EcoRI fragment of the
NADH-GOGAT cDNA (Gregerson et al., 1993 ) was subcloned into Bluescript
pKS
(Stratagene2) and recovered
as a BamHI-EcoRI fragment. This fragment was then ligated in frame to the GST in the pGEX-2T expression
vector (Pharmacia Biotech) and transformed into Escherichia
coli DH5 . Expression of the fusion protein was induced with
isopropyl- -thiogalactopyranoside according to the
manufacturer's description. Induction times, yields, and purification
progress were determined using Phast System SDS-PAGE 10% to 15%
gradient gels (Pharmacia Biotech). The expressed fusion protein was
insoluble; therefore, the lysed cell debris was resuspended in PBS
(0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M
K2HPO4, pH 7.2) containing
1.5% sarcosyl. We were unable to purify the fusion protein using the
GST-binding column. Therefore, the fusion protein was cleaved with
thrombin according to the manufacturer's description. The protein was
then precipitated with 30% ammonium sulfate, resuspended in PBS (pH
7.2) containing 1.5% sarcosyl, and applied to a Superose 6 column
(Pharmacia Biotech). The desired column fractions were pooled and
precipitated in 90% ethanol; the pellets were resuspended directly in
Maizel sample buffer (Maizel, 1971 ) and subsequently subjected to
electrophoresis and immunoblotting.
Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting
The NADH-GOGAT antibodies used were produced against purified
NADH-GOGAT protein (Anderson et al., 1989 ). Antibodies were affinity
purified, using the partly purified NADH-GOGAT polypeptide, with the
elution procedure described by Smith and Fischer (1984) . Immunoblot analysis was used to evaluate the specificity of the affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT antibodies. Samples of root nodules were
ground in extraction buffer and prepared for immunoblotting as
described by Gregerson et al. (1993) .
Immunocytochemical Localization of NADH-GOGAT
For light microscopy the root nodule tissues were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde and 0.25% glutaraldehyde in 50 mM sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). The tissue was then rinsed twice in the same buffer and twice in deionized water, and dehydrated in a graded ethanol
series. After the absolute ethanol was replaced with xylene, tissues
were embedded in paraffin (Paraplast, Oxford Labware, St. Louis, MO).
Embedded tissue was sectioned at a thickness of 7 µm and affixed to
poly-L-Lys-coated slides. The paraffin was removed with
xylene and the deparaffinized sections were incubated two times for 10 min in a PBS (pH 7.2) solution containing 0.1% Tween 20. Incubation
with the primary antibody was performed overnight at 4°C in 500 µL
of the same solution containing 15 µg of IgG. As a control, slides
were incubated with the primary antibody solution containing 250 µg
of partially purified NADH-GOGAT polypeptide. The sections were then
washed four times for 10 min each in a PBS (pH 7.2) solution containing
0.1% Tween 20, after which an alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated
secondary antibody (Bio-Rad) was applied overnight at 4°C at a 1:300
dilution. The sections were then washed four times for 10 min each in a
PBS (pH 7.2) solution and transferred into 100 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 9.0) containing 0.5 M NaCl and 5 mM
MgCl2 in which the alkaline-phosphatase reaction was performed with nitroblue tetrazolium
chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate according to the
manufacturer's description (Bio-Rad). Slides were mounted with
Permount (Fisher Scientific), and the sections were viewed and
photographed with a Labophot microscope (Nikon).
For immunogold labeling and electron microscopy, approximately
200-µm-thick root-nodule sections were made from 19-d-old root nodules using a hand microtome and subjected to cryofixation using a
high-pressure freezer (Balzers Union, Balzers, Liechtenstein). Freeze
substitution was performed in anhydrous acetone containing 2% uranyl
acetate, 1% glutaraldehyde, 1% water, and 10% methanol in an freeze
substitution unit 10 (Balzers Union). The substitution times were
12 h in 92°C, 8 h in 62°C, and 8 h in 32°C
(Studer et al., 1992 ). High-pressure freezing, cryosubstitution allows the "real-to-life" preservation of tissues, and thus is superior to
chemical fixation (Studer et al., 1989 , 1992 ; Kaneko and Walther, 1995 ). The specimens were then embedded and polymerized in LR Gold at
20°C (London Resin, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington,
PA) (Staiger et al., 1994 ). Ultrathin sections of silver interference
color were mounted on Formvar-coated nickel grids. Sections were
blocked in PBS (pH 7.2) containing 0.1% Tween 20. Incubations with the
affinity-purified primary antibodies were performed overnight at 4°C
(4.5 µg of IgG in 25 µL). As a control, grids were incubated with
the primary antibody solution containing 75 µg of partially purified
NADH-GOGAT polypeptide. After washing in PBS (pH 7.2) containing 0.1%
Tween 20, samples were incubated with the secondary antibody coupled to
18-nm gold in a dilution of 1:300 overnight at 4°C (Jackson
ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Poststaining was done with 2% uranyl
acetate for 20 min. Sections were examined and pictured on a
transmission electron microscope (Philips CM12, Eindhoven, The
Netherlands). Morphometric methods were used to compare the labeling
density for NADH-GOGAT in root nodules. Twenty-seven micrographs, each of randomly selected infected and uninfected cells from three individual nodules, were evaluated using the point-count method of
Weibel (1979) .
 |
RESULTS |
Analysis of NADH-GOGAT Antibody Specificity Using Western Blots
An 886-bp fragment of NADH-GOGAT cDNA was fused in frame to the
GST gene in the pGEX-2T expression vector. Expression
of the fusion protein in E. coli resulted in the formation
of a 59-kD polypeptide, which contained GST (26 kD) and a 33.1-kD
NADH-GOGAT fragment. The 59-kD fusion protein is cleavable with
thrombin, resulting in a GST and a NADH-GOGAT polypeptide. An
immunoblot incubated with polyclonal NADH-GOGAT antibodies is shown in
Figure 1A. No signal was detected in the
lane containing total protein of E. coli carrying the
uninduced pGEX-GOGAT construct (Fig. 1A, lane 1). In Figure 1A, lane 2, which contains total protein of E. coli carrying the induced
pGEX-GOGAT construct, antibodies reacted with two polypeptides of
approximately 59 and 49 kD. In expression systems different sizes of
polypeptides are not unexpected because of proteolysis and incomplete
translations (Pharmacia Biotech). When the partially purified fusion
protein was digested with thrombin, the expected 33.1-kD NADH-GOGAT
polypeptide was released and reacted with NADH-GOGAT antibodies (Fig.
1A, lane 3). The NADH-GOGAT antibodies did not recognize any protein
from pGEX-2T cells not harboring the NADH-GOGAT fragment (data not shown). When extracted root nodule protein was incubated with the
affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT antiserum, a single band of approximately 220 kD was detected (Fig. 1B). This result is in agreement with previously published data (Anderson et al., 1989 ; Vance and Gantt, 1992 ; Gregerson et al., 1993 ).

View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
A, Immunoblot analysis of the pGEX-NADH-GOGAT
fusion protein. The blot of a 15% polyacrylamide gel was probed with
polyclonal NADH-GOGAT antiserum and developed with
alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Lanes 1 through 3 contain 10 µg of protein each. Lane 1 contains total protein from
E. coli carrying the uninduced pGEX-NADH-GOGAT
construct; lane 2 contains total E. coli protein
carrying the induced pGEX-NADH-GOGAT construct; and lane 3 contains the
partially purified pGEX-NADH-GOGAT construct cleaved with thrombin. B,
Immunoblot of total soluble nodule protein. The blot of a 6%
polyacrylamide gel was probed with affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT
antibodies and developed with alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated secondary
antibodies. Lane 1 contains 100 µg of soluble protein of effective
nodules.
|
|
Immunocytochemical Localization of NADH-GOGAT in Alfalfa Root
Nodules.
Immunocytochemical localization of NADH-GOGAT was performed on
19-d-old alfalfa root nodules. Nodule structure was classified based on
the nomenclature of Vasse et al. (1990) . In a longitudinal section
through an alfalfa nodule (Fig. 2, A and
E), five distinct zones were defined: the nodule meristem (zone I), the
invasion zone (zone II), the amyloplast-rich interzone (zone II-III
[*]), the N2-fixing zone and proximal
inefficient zone (zone III), and the senescence zone (zone IV) (not
seen in Fig. 2). The nodule parenchyma, vascular bundles, and outer
cortex are seen at the periphery of the central nodule tissue. Figure
2, A through E, shows longitudinal sections through 19- and 33-d-old
root nodules incubated with affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT antibodies,
followed by incubation with a secondary antibody linked to alkaline
phosphatase. The immunolocalization (blue spots) found after
development reflects the localization of the NADH-GOGAT protein. The
NADH-GOGAT protein was found throughout the interior of both the 19- and 33-d-old nodules (Fig. 2, A and E). The strongest signal was seen
at the periphery of infected cells (Fig. 2B). At a higher magnification it became apparent that the protein is mainly localized in infected cells near the intercellular spaces (Fig. 2C). A weak staining was also
obtained from uninfected cells (Fig. 2C).

View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
Localization of the NADH-GOGAT protein in
longitudinal sections of 19-d-old (A-C) and 33-d-old (E and F) root
nodules. Nodule ultrastructure was classified based on the nomenclature
of Vasse et al. (1990) : the meristem (zone I), the invasion zone (zone
II), the interzone (*), and the N2-fixing zone (zone III).
Sections A through E were probed with affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT
antibodies and with alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated secondary
antibodies. The signal, which reflects the localization of the
NADH-GOGAT protein, is seen as blue spots. The black arrows point
toward infected cells, and the red arrow points toward uninfected
cells. Longitudinal section of a 19-d-old alfalfa root nodule is shown
in A. Enlargement of the boxed regions in A shown in B and C includes
part of the N2-fixing zone (zone III) with infected and
uninfected cells. D shows control, affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT
antibodies that were incubated together with the partially purified
NADH-GOGAT polypeptide on a longitudinal section through a 19-d-old
root nodule. E shows a longitudinal section through a 33-d-old root
nodule, and F shows an enlargement of the boxed region in E that is
part of the proximal region of the nodule. Bars in A and E = 270 µm; bars in B, D, and F = 70 µm; and bar in C = 15 µm.
|
|
In the accompanying paper by Trepp et al. (1999) , we show that the
NADH-GOGAT transcript in 33-d-old nodules is localized in a 5- to
15-cell-wide zone including the interzone and the
N2-fixing zone. To address whether the NADH-GOGAT
protein is abundant in the proximal part of the root nodule,
longitudinal sections of 33-d-old root nodules were incubated with
affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT antiserum (Fig. 2E). Our results suggest
that the NADH-GOGAT protein is abundant in the proximal part of a root
nodule (Fig. 2F). In addition, the strongest signal after development
was observed at the periphery of infected cells, as it was in 19-d-old
nodules (Fig. 2, B and C). To test the specificity of the localization, affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT antibodies were incubated together with
partially purified NADH-GOGAT polypeptide. This resulted in complete
loss of immunostaining and indicates that the antibodies had specific
affinity for NADH-GOGAT (Fig. 2D). Two additional controls performed
with the preimmune serum and background alkaline-phosphatase staining
resulted in nonspecific staining (data not shown).
Immunogold Localization of NADH-GOGAT in Alfalfa Root Nodules
Immunogold localization of NADH-GOGAT was carried out to determine
the distribution of NADH-GOGAT at the ultrastructural level. Figure
3A shows infected and uninfected root
nodule cells from which all subsequent pictures were taken. Close-ups
of bacteroids, amyloplasts in infected and uninfected cells, and
intercellular spaces are seen in Figure 3, B to E, respectively.
Evaluation of 30 individual profiles showed that gold particles mainly
accumulate over the amyloplasts. Particles were counted in randomly
selected areas (0.25 µm2), and the results
indicate that NADH-GOGAT protein is about 3-fold more abundant in the
amyloplasts of infected cells than in the amyloplasts of uninfected
cells (Table I). Occasionally, some gold
particles were found over intercellular spaces, cytosol, and
bacteroids. However, the particle count was much lower compared with
the amount of gold found over amyloplasts. As a control, the
affinity-purified antibody was incubated together with the partially
purified NADH-GOGAT 33.1-kD polypeptide. This resulted in a loss of
specific localization of the NADH-GOGAT protein (data not shown). Two
additional control experiments performed with the preimmune serum and
background immunogold labeling resulted in nonspecific localization
(data not shown).

View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
Immunocytochemical localization of NADH-GOGAT
protein in root nodules of alfalfa. The section was probed with
affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT antibodies and with secondary antibodies
coupled to 18-nm gold particles. A shows the overview from which
subsequent pictures were taken. Parts of an infected cell with
bacteroids and cytosol are shown in B. C shows an amyloplast of an
infected cell. D and E show an amyloplast of uninfected cells and
intercellular space, respectively. ba, Bacteroid; cyt, cytosol; m,
mitochondria; ap, amyloplast; cw, cell wall; is, intercellular space.
Arrows point toward areas containing gold particles. Bar in A = 5 µm; bars in B through E = 1 µm.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I.
Distribution of gold particles in various alfalfa
nodule cells after immunolabeling with affinity-purified NADH-GOGAT
antibodies
All the tissues were from effective N2-fixing nodules.
Labeling density values are means ± SE.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
To our knowledge, this is the first report to determine the
subcellular localization of the NADH-GOGAT protein by
immunocytochemistry. Our results strongly suggest that the NADH-GOGAT
protein is localized in the amyloplasts of root nodules. This finding
is further supported by the presence of a 101-amino acid targeting
sequence on the NADH-GOGAT cDNA, which indicates compartmentalization
of the NADH-GOGAT protein (Gregerson et al., 1993 ). P-Sort analysis
indicates the presequence targets NADH-GOGAT to the ER (Nakai and
Kaneshisa, 1992 ). Using the criteria of von Heijne et al. (1989) , the
presequence suggests mitochondrial or plastidic localization.
Although some authors suggested a cytosolic localization of NADH-GOGAT
(Hecht et al., 1988 ), most reported fractionation studies indicate a plastid localization for the enzyme (Shelp and Atkins, 1984 ; Chen and
Cullimore, 1988 ). Plants contain two forms of GOGAT, a Fd- and a
NADH-dependent form (Temple et al., 1998b ). Molecular data (Sakakibara
et al., 1991 ), immunocytochemical localization (Becker et al., 1993 ),
biochemical studies (Wallsgrove et al., 1979 ), and genetic studies
(Somerville and Ogren, 1980 ; Lea et al., 1990 ) provide strong evidence
for the plastid localization of Fd-GOGAT. Thus, both forms of GOGAT
that are found in higher plants appear to be localized in plastids.
Several studies have demonstrated that the plant NADH-GOGAT does not
use NADPH as a reductant (Anderson et al., 1988; Chen and Cullimore,
1988 ; Lea et al., 1990 ). Because NADPH and not NADH is thought to be
the most abundant pyridine nucleotide in plastids (Lea et al., 1990 ),
the question arises whether amyloplasts in root nodules are able to
provide sufficient NADH for NADH-GOGAT activity. The recently reported
nodule-enhanced malate dehydrogenase (Miller et al., 1998 ) has also
been localized in amyloplasts of root nodules (G.B. Trepp and C.P.
Vance, unpublished data). The nodule-enhanced malate dehydrogenase also
uses NADH as a reductant (Miller et al., 1998 ). This provides
additional evidence that sufficient NADH is generated in amyloplasts of
root nodules. NADH for NADH-GOGAT activity could be generated in
plastids through the glycolytic degradation of starch (Plaxton, 1996 ).
In root tissue, where Fd-GOGAT can be abundant (Matoh and Takahashi,
1982 ; Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1993 ), GOGAT activity correlates
with the activity of the NADPH-generating oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway. Therefore, it has been concluded that this pathway may be
involved in the generation of reductant for the reaction performed by
Fd-GOGAT (Bowsher et al., 1992 ; Emes and Neuhaus, 1997 ). To become
available for NADH-GOGAT, NADPH must be converted by a trans-hydrogenase into NADH (Bowsher et al., 1992 ). To date,
this enzyme has not been characterized in plastids. Further experiments are required to determine the source of reductant for plastid-localized NADH-GOGAT.
With the localization of the NADH-GOGAT protein in alfalfa root
nodules, we increase our understanding of N2
metabolism in amide-transporting legumes. In ureide transporters such
as soybean, N2 assimilation occurs in both
infected and uninfected cells (Boland et al., 1982 ; Shelp et al., 1983 ;
VandenBosch and Newcomb, 1986 ). However, it appears that in the nodules
of the amide transporter alfalfa, the infected cells are the main site
for primary assimilation of N. Two lines of evidence support this
assertion. First, NADH-GOGAT and AAT-2 proteins are predominantly
present in plastids of infected cells, as shown by immunogold
localization (Robinson et al., 1994 ) and fractionation studies (Shelp
and Atkins, 1984 ; Chen and Cullimore, 1989 ). Second, several
investigators have shown that GS (Shelp and Atkins, 1984 ; Forde et al.,
1989 ) and AS (Shelp and Atkins, 1984 ) activities and protein are
predominantly present in the cytosol of infected cells. Moreover,
analysis of the alfalfa nodule-enhanced GS1
(Temple et al., 1995 ) and AS (Shi et al., 1997 ) cDNAs revealed that
both sequences predict a cytosolic localization for these proteins.
Although the plastid-localized GS2 has been
detected in root nodules (Temple et al., 1998a ), fractionation studies suggest that GS1 accounts for more than 90% of
total nodule GS activity (Shelp and Atkins, 1984 ). Thus, the four
enzymes involved in the primary assimilation of N in alfalfa root
nodules are partitioned between two cell compartments: GS and AS in the
cytosol, and NADH-GOGAT and AAT-2 in the plastids of infected cells.
Considering the cellular location of these four enzymes, two cycles
linked through NADH-GOGAT could explain how amino acids of primary N
assimilation are channeled in amide-transporting legume species. A
cytosolic Glu cycle (cycle 1) functioning synergistically with the
amyloplast Glu cycle (cycle 2) allows metabolite exchange to occur
(Fig. 4). Cycle 1 reactions are catalyzed
by AS and GS, whereas AAT-2 is part of cycle 2, with NADH-GOGAT being
the common link. In addition to the subcellular localization, several
lines of evidence support this hypothesis. Inhibition of AAT-2
stimulates the flow of labeled carbon from Asp into Asn but inhibits
labeling of Glu (Snapp and Vance, 1986 ), showing that Asn and
Glu synthesis are linked via AAT-2. When alfalfa nodules are labeled
with 14CO2 during a 20-min
period, Asn, Asp, and Glu are the most abundantly labeled amino acids,
showing the partitioning between the cytosolic and plastid enzyme pools
(Maxwell et al., 1984 ). Furthermore, inhibition of NADH-GOGAT by
aza-Ser results in increased incorporation of
15N2 into the amide
position of both Gln and Asn (Ta et al., 1986 , 1988 ), indicating the
close linkage of Asn synthesis to NADH-GOGAT. The enhanced expression
of all four genes during effective nodule development (Gregerson et
al., 1993 ; Vance et al., 1994 ; Shi et al., 1997 ) provides further
support for the possibility of these cycles occurring. If the proposed
model is correct, then the link between the two cycles occurs through
the NADH-GOGAT reaction and, therefore, this reaction would be the most
likely regulatory point and rate-limiting step.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 4.
Nitrogen assimilation in alfalfa root nodule and
the cellular localization of the enzymes involved. Two linked Glu
cycles are proposed to be involved in the production of Asn. Cycle 1, Cytosolic Glu cycle; cycle 2, amyloplast Glu cycle. Metabolites
involved are NH4+, Gln, Glu, 2-oxoglutarate,
oxaloacetate, Asp, and Asn.
|
|
To become available for the reactions catalyzed by GS and NADH-GOGAT,
Gln and Glu must be transported across the plastid membrane of a root
nodule cell. Chen and Cullimore (1989) have proposed a specific
translocator that shuttles Gln and Glu between plastids and cytosol in
Phaseolus vulgaris root nodules. An analogous system probably exists in chloroplasts of oat, where a Gln/Glu translocator has been identified (Yu and Woo, 1988 ). Moreover, in Arabidopsis mutants defective in chloroplast dicarboxylic acid transport, the
uptake of malate, 2-oxoglutarate, Asp, and Glu into chloroplasts was
severely reduced, whereas the levels of Gln were unaffected (Somerville
and Ogren, 1983 ). These results indicate that Gln is transported by a
distinct translocator into chloroplasts. It has been proposed that this
Gln/Glu translocator plays an essential role during the
photorespiratory nitrogen cycle (Yu and Woo, 1988 ), suggesting that a
similar translocator may be important during root nodule N
assimilation. However, in chloroplasts several translocators have been
identified with overlapping substrate specificities (Fluegge and Heldt,
1991 ). Whether amyloplasts in alfalfa root nodules have specific amino
acid transporters/translocators or several transporters/translocators
with overlapping specificity, or both, has yet to be determined.
In 33-d-old alfalfa root nodules the NADH-GOGAT transcripts were
localized in a 5- to 15-cell-wide zone (Trepp et al., 1999 ). Because
the NADH-GOGAT transcript is not detectable in the proximal part of
root nodules, we were curious about whether this was also the case for
the NADH-GOGAT protein. Our results suggest that the NADH-GOGAT protein
is present in the proximal part of root nodules. Based on the changes
in bacteroid morphology from type 4 to type 5 as well as
acetylene-reduction assays, Vasse et al. (1990) suggested that the
proximal part of a root nodule is inefficient in
N2 fixation. In 33-d-old root nodules the
nifH gene, which encodes a subunit of the bacterial
nitrogenase, is also expressed in a 5- to 15-cell-wide zone, and the
transcript is nondetectable in the proximal part (Trepp et al., 1999 ).
In Pisum sativum it has been estimated that the stability of
the nitrogenase protein is approximately 2 d (Bisseling et al.,
1980 ). Taken together, these results suggest that there may be little
or no N2 fixation in the proximal part of a
33-d-old root nodule. This evidence leads to the question regarding the
role of NADH-GOGAT in the proximal part of the organ. NADH-GOGAT,
together with GS, may be involved in the remobilization of nitrogenous
compounds in senescing root nodule tissue. However, the NADH-GOGAT
enzyme could be inactive because of a lack of substrate or cofactors.
Several independent studies indicate an important role for
GS1 during senescence (Kamachi et al., 1991 ,
1992 ; Bernhard and Matile, 1992; Feller and Fischer, 1994 ). However,
the evidence in support of a role in senescence for NADH-GOGAT is
controversial. In wheat leaves NADH-GOGAT shows a transient increase in
activity during dark-induced senescence (Peeters and Van Laere, 1992 ). However, this does not appear to occur during natural leaf senescence in rice (Yamaya et al., 1992 ; Hayakawa et al., 1993 , 1994 ). In addition, GS activity in alfalfa nodules of the early-senescing genotype in1 Saranac is comparable with
that of wild type, and the activity of NADH-GOGAT in
in1 Saranac nodules is dramatically reduced
(Egli et al., 1989 ). Thus, the role of NADH-GOGAT in reassimilating N2 during root nodule senescence is unclear.
This report documents the immunogold localization of NADH-GOGAT protein
to amyloplasts in alfalfa root nodules. Furthermore, the NADH-GOGAT
protein is predominantly located in infected cells. We suggest,
therefore, that in alfalfa, infected cells are the main site for
assimilation of symbiotically fixed N2. In
contrast to its transcript, the NADH-GOGAT protein is present in the
proximal part of 33-d-old root nodules; the role of the enzyme in this part of the nodule remains to be determined.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
1
This work was supported in part by National
Science Foundation grant no. IBN-9206890 and ETH-Zurich
fellowship no. 0-28-001-91. This paper is a joint contribution from the
Plant Science Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service, and the Minnesota Agricultural
Experiment Station (paper no. 98-1-13-0101, Scientific Journal Series).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail vance004{at}maroon.tc.umn.edu; fax
1-651-625-5058.
Received September 14, 1998;
accepted December 9, 1998.
2
Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or
vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to
the exclusion of other products or vendors that might also be
suitable.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
Abbreviations:
AAT-2, Asp aminotransferase.
AS, Asn synthetase.
GOGAT, Glu synthase.
GS, Gln synthetase.
GST, glutathione-S-transferase.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank the Integrated Microscopy Resource at the University of
Wisconsin, Madison. We also thank Sue Wick and Thomas Soulen for
reviewing the manuscript, and special thanks to Nikolaus Amrhein for
his insightful remarks.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
Anderson MP,
Vance CP,
Heichel GH,
Miller SS
(1989)
Purification and characterization of NADH-Glu synthase from alfalfa root nodules.
Plant Physiol
90:
351-358
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Becker TW,
Rechenmann CP,
Suzuki A,
Hirel B
(1993)
Subcellular and immunocytochemical localization of the enzymes involved in ammonia assimilation in mesophyll and bundle-sheath cells of maize leaves.
Planta
191:
129-136
Bernhard WR,
Matile P
(1994)
Differential expression of glutamine synthetase genes during the senescence of Arabidopsis thaliana rosette leaves.
Plant Sci
98:
7-14
[CrossRef]
Bisseling T,
Van Straten J,
Houwaard F
(1980)
Turnover of nitrogenase and leghemoglobin in root nodules of Pisum sativum.
Biochim Biophys Acta
610:
360-370
[Medline]
Boland MJ,
Benny AG
(1977)
Enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in legume nodules: purification and properties of NADH-dependent Glu synthase from lupine nodules.
Eur J Biochem
79:
355-362
[Medline]
Boland MJ, Farnden KJF, Robertson JG (1980) Ammonia assimilation
in nitrogen-fixing legume nodules. In WE Newton, WH
Orme-Johnson, eds, Nitrogen Fixation, Vol 2. University Park Press,
Baltimore, MD, pp 33-52
Boland MJ,
Hanks JF,
Reynolds PHS,
Blevins DG,
Tolbert NE,
Schubert KR
(1982)
Subcellular organization of ureide biogenesis from glycolytic intermediates and ammonium in nitrogen fixing soybean nodules.
Planta
155:
45-51
[CrossRef]
Bowsher CG,
Boulton EL,
Rose J,
Nayagam S,
Emes MJ
(1992)
Reductant for Glu synthase is generated by the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in non-photosynthetic root plastids.
Plant J
2:
893-898
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Brangeon J,
Hirel B,
Forchioni A
(1989)
Immunogold localization of glutamine synthetase in soybean leaves, roots and nodules.
Protoplasma
151:
88-97
[CrossRef]
Chen FL,
Cullimore JV
(1988)
Two isoenzymes of NADH-dependent Glu synthase in root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Plant Physiol
88:
1411-1417
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chen FL,
Cullimore JV
(1989)
Location of two isoenzymes of NADH-dependent Glu synthase in root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Planta
179:
441-447
Datta DB,
Xiaoyin C,
Wong PP,
Triplett EW
(1990)
Immunocytochemical localization of glutamine synthetase in organs of Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Plant Physiol
96:
507-512
Egli MA,
Griffith SM,
Miller SS,
Anderson MA,
Vance CP
(1989)
Nitrogen assimilatory enzymes and enzyme protein during development and senescence of effective and plant gene-controlled ineffective alfalfa nodules.
Plant Physiol
91:
898-904
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Emes MJ,
Neuhaus HE
(1997)
Metabolism and transport in non-photosynthetic plastids.
J Exp Bot
48:
1995-2005
Feller U,
Fischer A
(1994)
Nitrogen metabolism in senescing leaves.
Crit Rev Plant Sci
13:
241-273
Fluegge UI,
Heldt HW
(1991)
Metabolite translocators of the chloroplast envelope.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
42:
129-144
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Forde BG,
Day HM,
Turton JF,
Shen WJ,
Cullimore JV,
Oliver JE
(1989)
Two glutamine synthetase genes from Phaseolus vulgaris L. display contrasting developmental and spatial patterns of expression in transgenic Lotus corniculatus plants.
Plant Cell
1:
391-401
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Greenwood DJ
(1982)
Nitrogen supply and crop yield: the global scene.
Plant Soil
67:
45-59
Gregerson RG,
Miller SS,
Twary SN,
Gantt JS,
Vance CP
(1993)
Molecular characterization of NADH-dependent Glu synthase from alfalfa nodules.
Plant Cell
5:
215-226
[Abstract]
Hayakawa T,
Nakamura T,
Hattori F,
Mae T,
Ojima K,
Yamaya T
(1994)
Cellular localization of NADH-dependent Glu synthase protein in vascular bundles of unexpanded leaf blades and young grains of rice plants.
Planta
193:
455-460
Hayakawa T,
Nakamura T,
Mae T,
Ojima K
(1993)
Change in content of two Glu synthase proteins in spikelets of rice plants during ripening.
Plant Physiol
101:
1257-1262
[Abstract]
Hecht U,
Oelmueller R,
Schmidt S,
Mohr H
(1988)
Action of light, nitrate and ammonium on the levels of NADH- and ferredoxin-dependent Glu synthases in the cotyledons of mustard seedlings.
Planta
175:
130-138
Hirasawa M,
Tamura G
(1984)
Flavin and iron-sulphur containing ferredoxin-linked Glu synthase from spinach leaves.
J Biochem
95:
983-994
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kamachi K,
Yamaya T,
Hayakawa T,
Mae T,
Ojima K
(1992)
Changes in cytosolic glutamine synthetase polypeptide and its mRNA in leaf blades of rice plants during natural senescence.
Plant Physiol
98:
1323-1329
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kamachi K,
Yamaya T,
Mae T,
Ojima K
(1991)
A role for glutamine synthetase in the remobilization of leaf nitrogen during natural senescence in rice leaves.
Plant Physiol
96:
411-417
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kaneko Y,
Walther P
(1995)
Comparison of ultrastructure of germinating pea leaves prepared by high-pressure freezing-freeze substitution and conventional chemical fixation.
J Electron Microsc
44:
104-109
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Knauff DB,
Hirasawa M,
Ameyibor E,
Fu W,
Johnson MK
(1991)
Spectroscopic evidence for a [3Fe-4S] cluster in spinach Glu synthase.
J Biol Chem
266:
15080-15084
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lea PJ,
Robinson SA,
Stewart GR
(1990)
The enzymology and metabolism of glutamine, Glu and asparagine.
In
BJ Miflin,
PJ Lea,
eds, The Biochemistry of Plants: Intermediary Nitrogen Metabolism, Vol 16.
Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 121-159
Maizel JV (1971) Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of viral
proteins. In K Maramorasch, H Koporowski, eds, Methods in
Virology, Vol 5. Academic Press, New York, pp 179-246
Matoh T,
Takahashi E
(1982)
Changes in the activities of ferredoxin- and NADH-Glu synthase during seedling development of peas.
Planta
154:
289-294
[CrossRef]
Maxwell CA,
Vance CP,
Heichel GH,
Stade S
(1984)
CO2 fixation in alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil root nodules and partitioning of 14C to the plant.
Crop Sci
24:
257-264
Miller SS,
Driscoll BT,
Gregerson RG,
Gantt JS,
Vance CP
(1998)
Alfalfa malate dehydrogenase (MDH): molecular cloning and characterization of five different forms reveals a unique nodule-enhanced MDH.
Plant J
15:
173-184
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nakai K,
Kaneshisa M
(1992)
A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells.
Genomics
14:
897-911
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Peeters KM,
Van Laere AJ
(1992)
Ammonium and amino acid metabolism in excised leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum) senescing in the dark.
Physiol Plant
84:
243-249
[CrossRef]
Plaxton WC
(1996)
The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
47:
185-214
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Redinbaugh MG,
Campbell WH
(1993)
Glutamine synthetase and ferredoxin-dependent Glu synthase expression in the maize (Zea mays) root primary response to nitrate. Evidence for an organ-specific response.
Plant Physiol
101:
1249-1255
[Abstract]
Robinson DL,
Kahn ML,
Vance CP
(1994)
Cellular localization of nodule-enhanced Asp aminotransferase in Medicago sativa L.
Planta
207:
245-250
Robinson DL,
Pathirana SM,
Gantt JS,
Vance CP
(1996)
Immunogold localization of nodule-enhanced phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in alfalfa.
Plant Cell Environ
19:
602-608
Sakakibara N,
Watanabe M,
Hase T,
Sugiyama T
(1991)
Molecular cloning and characterization of complementary DNA encoding for ferredoxin-dependent Glu synthase in maize leaf.
J Biol Chem
266:
2028-2035
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Shelp BJ,
Atkins CA
(1984)
Subcellular localization of enzymes of ammonia assimilation and asparagine synthesis in root nodules of Lupinus albus L.
Plant Sci Lett
36:
225-230
[CrossRef]
Shelp BJ,
Atkins CA,
Storer PJ,
Canvin DT
(1983)
Cellular and subcellular organization of pathways of ammonia assimilation and ureide synthesis in nodules of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp).
Arch Biochem Biophys
224:
429-441
[Medline]
Shi L,
Twary SN,
Yoshioka H,
Gregerson RG,
Miller SS,
Samac DA,
Gantt JS,
Unkefer PJ,
Vance CP
(1997)
Nitrogen assimilation in alfalfa: isolation and characterization of an asparagine synthetase gene showing enhanced expression in root nodules and dark-adapted leaves.
Plant Cell
9:
1330-1356
Smith DE,
Fischer PA
(1984)
Identification, developmental regulation and response to heat shock of two antigenically related forms of major nuclear envelope protein in Drosophila embryos: application of an improved method for affinity purification of antibodies using polypeptides immobilized on nitrocellulose.
J Cell Biol
99:
20-28
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Snapp SS,
Vance CP
(1986)
Asparagine biosynthesis in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) root nodules.
Plant Physiol
82:
390-395
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Somerville CR,
Ogren WL
(1980)
Inhibition of photosynthesis in Arabidopsis mutants lacking in leaf Glu synthase activity.
Nature
286:
257-259
[CrossRef]
Somerville SC,
Ogren WL
(1983)
An Arabidopsis thaliana mutant defective in chloroplast dicarboxylate transport.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
80:
1290-1294
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Staiger D,
Kappeler S,
Muller M,
Apel K
(1994)
The proteins encoded by two tapetum-specific transcripts, Satap35 and Satap44, from Sinapis alba L. are localized in the exine cell wall layer of developing microspores.
Planta
192:
221-231
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Studer D,
Hennecke H,
Mueller M
(1992)
High-pressure freezing of soybean nodules leads to an improved preservation of ultrastructure.
Planta
188:
155-163
[CrossRef]
Studer D,
Michel M,
Mueller M
(1989)
High-pressure freezing comes of age.
Scanning Microsc Suppl
3:
253-269
[Medline]
Suzuki A,
Gadal P
(1984)
Glutamate synthase: physiochemical and functional properties of different forms in higher plants and in other organisms.
Physiol Veg
22:
471-486
Ta TC,
Faris MA,
MacDowall FDH
(1986)
Pathways of nitrogen metabolism in nodules of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).
Plant Physiol
80:
1002-1005
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ta TC,
MacDowall FDH,
Faris MA
(1988)
Assimilation and partitioning of labeled nitrogen from 15N2 and 15NO3 by alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).
J Plant Physiol
132:
239-244
Temple SJ,
Bagga S,
Sengupta-Gopalan C
(1998a)
Down-regulation of specific members of the glutamine synthetase gene family in alfalfa by antisense RNA technology.
Plant Mol Biol
37:
535-547
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Temple SJ,
Heard J,
Ganter G,
Dunn K,
Sengupta-Gopalan C
(1995)
Characterization of a nodule-enhanced glutamine synthetase from alfalfa: nucleotide sequence, in situ localization, and transcript analysis.
Mol Plant Microbe Interact
8:
218-227
[Medline]
Temple SJ,
Vance CP,
Gantt JS
(1998b)
Glutamate synthase and nitrogen assimilation.
Trends Plant Sci
3:
51-56
Trepp GB,
van de Mortel M,
Yoshioka H,
Miller SS,
Samac DA,
Gantt JS,
Vance CP
(1999)
NADH-Glu synthase in alfalfa root nodules. Genetic regulation and cellular expression.
Plant Physiol
119:
817-828
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
VandenBosch KA,
Newcomb EH
(1986)
Immunogold localization of nodule-specific uricase in developing soybean nodules.
Planta
167:
198-201
Vance CP,
Gantt JS
(1992)
Control of nitrogen and carbon metabolism in root nodules.
Physiol Plant
85:
266-274
[CrossRef]
Vance CP,
Gregerson RG,
Robinson DL,
Miller SS,
Gantt JS
(1994)
Primary assimilation of nitrogen in alfalfa nodules: molecular features of the enzymes involved.
Plant Sci
101:
51-64
[CrossRef]
Vance CP,
Miller SS,
Gregerson RG,
Samac DA,
Robinson DL,
Gantt JS
(1995)
Alfalfa NADH-dependent Glu synthase: structure of the gene and importance in symbiotic N2 fixation.
Plant J
8:
345-358
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vasse J,
de Billy F,
Camut S,
Truchet G
(1990)
Correlation between ultrastructure, differentiation of bacteroids and nitrogen fixation.
J Bacteriol
172:
4295-4306
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
von Heijne G,
Stepphun J,
Herrmann RG
(1989)
Domain structure of mitochondrial and chloroplast targeting peptides.
Eur J Biochem
180:
535-545
[Web of Science][Medline]
Wallsgrove RM,
Lea PJ,
Miflin BJ
(1979)
Distribution of the enzymes of nitrogen assimilation within the pea leaf cell.
Plant Physiol
63:
232-236
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Weibel ER (1979) Stereological Methods, Vol 1. Academic Press, New
York
Yamaya T,
Hayakawa T,
Tanasawa K,
Kamachi K,
Mae T,
Ojima K
(1992)
Tissue distribution of Glu synthase and glutamine synthetase in rice leaves. Occurrence of NADH-dependent Glu synthase protein and activity in the unexpanded non-green leaf blades.
Plant Physiol
100:
1427-1432
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Yu J,
Woo KC
(1988)
Glutamine transport and the role of glutamine translocator in chloroplasts.
Plant Physiol
88:
1048-1054
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. White, J. Prell, E. K. James, and P. Poole
Nutrient Sharing between Symbionts
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2007;
144(2):
604 - 614.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Suarez, C. Avila, F. Gallardo, F. R. Canton, A. Garcia-Gutierrez, M. G. Claros, and F. M. Canovas
Molecular and enzymatic analysis of ammonium assimilation in woody plants
J. Exp. Bot.,
April 15, 2002;
53(370):
891 - 904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Imsande, M. Berkemeyer, R. Scheibe, U. Schumann, C. Gietl, and R. G. Palmer
A soybean plastid-targeted NADH-malate dehydrogenase: cloning and expression analyses
Am. J. Botany,
December 1, 2001;
88(12):
2136 - 2142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chichkova, J. Arellano, C. P. Vance, and G. Hernandez
Transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress alfalfa NADH-glutamate synthase have higher carbon and nitrogen content
J. Exp. Bot.,
November 1, 2001;
52(364):
2079 - 2087.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hirose and T. Yamaya
Okadaic Acid Mimics Nitrogen-Stimulated Transcription of the NADH-Glutamate Synthase Gene in Rice Cell Cultures
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 1999;
121(3):
805 - 812.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|