Plant Physiol. (1999) 119: 1209-1216
Chloroplast-Targeted ERD1 Protein Declines but Its mRNA Increases
during Senescence in Arabidopsis1
L. Michael Weaver,
John E. Froehlich, and
Richard M. Amasino*
Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, 433 Babcock
Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (L.M.W., R.M.A.); and Michigan State
University-Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan
State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823-1312 (J.E.F.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Arabidopsis ERD1 is a
ClpC-like protein that sequence analysis suggests may interact with the
chloroplast-localized ClpP protease to facilitate proteolysis. The mRNA
encoded by the ERD1 gene has previously been shown to
accumulate in response to senescence and to a variety of stresses and
hormones. Here we show that the ERD1 protein, in contrast to the
ERD1 mRNA, strongly declines in abundance with age,
becoming undetectable in fully expanded leaves. Sequence analysis also
suggests that ERD1 is chloroplast targeted, and we show in an in vitro
system that the native protein is properly imported, processed, and
present within the soluble fraction of the chloroplast, presumably the
stroma. We show that ClpP protein, which is also present in the stroma,
declines with age in parallel with ERD1. These results are consistent
with the interaction of ERD1 and ClpP, but they suggest that it is
unlikely that either plays a major role during senescence. Certain
other chloroplast proteins decline with age coordinately with ERD1 and ClpP, suggesting that these declines are markers of an early
age-mediated change that occurs within the chloroplast.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Arabidopsis ERD1 was first reported as an mRNA that
rapidly accumulates in response to dehydration (Kiyosue et al., 1993
). It was later reported, under the name SAG15, as an mRNA that
accumulates during natural senescence (Lohman et al., 1994
; Nakashima
et al., 1997
; Weaver et al., 1998
). ERD1 shows strong sequence
similarity to the Clp ATPases, a widely distributed family of genes
characterized by two nonhomologous nucleotide-binding domains separated
by a spacer region (Squires and Squires, 1992
). These genes have been divided into three categories, based initially on the length of the
spacer. ClpAs have short spacers and are found in bacteria. ClpBs have
longer spacers and are found in bacteria, animals, plants, and fungi.
ClpCs have spacers of intermediate length and are found in plants and
some bacteria. Plant ClpCs have putative N-terminal transit peptides
that suggest chloroplast localization (for review, see Squires and
Squires, 1992
).
ClpBs are heat-shock-induced chaperonins that have been shown in yeast
and Escherichia coli to be necessary for survival at high
temperatures (Parsell et al., 1991
; Squires et al., 1991
; Squires and
Squires, 1992
). ClpAs function as ATP-dependent regulatory subunits of
the ClpP protease (Squires et al., 1991
; Squires and Squires, 1992
) and
also have been shown to function independently as chaperonins in vitro
(Wickner et al., 1994
; Wawrzynow et al., 1996
). The role of the ClpCs
is less clear, although recent work suggests that they also may
function both independently as chaperonins and as subunits of a Clp
protease. An Arabidopsis ClpC (AtClpC) has been shown to interact in
vitro with bacterial ClpP to facilitate ATP-dependent proteolysis
(Shanklin et al., 1995
), and barley ClpC and ClpP coimmunoprecipitate
from chloroplast extracts, suggesting that the two may interact
(Desimone et al., 1997
). It also has been found that a pea (Pisum
sativum) ClpC (originally called ClpA) is associated with the
chloroplast-translocation apparatus (Akita et al., 1997
; Nielsen et
al., 1997
) and may function as a molecular chaperone involved in the
transport of precursor proteins into plastids.
The final stage of leaf development is often characterized by the
mobilization of nutrients stored within the leaf to other parts of the
plant, and this mobilization and the changes that accompany it have
been referred to as the "senescence syndrome" (Bleecker and
Patterson, 1997
), an active process under nuclear control with a large
number of genes with mRNAs, proteins, or activities that increase
coordinately with it (for recent reviews, see Bleecker and Patterson,
1997
; Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997
; Nam, 1997
; Weaver et al., 1997
). An
early target of the senescence process is the chloroplast, where
approximately one-half of the protein in leaves is found. It is not
known which proteases are involved in mobilizing the nitrogen contained
within chloroplast proteins, although ATP-dependent proteolysis has
been observed within chloroplasts (Liu and Jagendorf, 1984
; Malek et
al., 1984
; Lindahl et al., 1995
; Halperin and Adam, 1996
). The ClpP
proteolytic subunit is encoded by and present within the chloroplast,
and certain nuclear-encoded ClpCs are known to be chloroplast localized (Shanklin et al., 1995
). Therefore, the Clp system is a candidate for
the mediation of chloroplast protein degradation during senescence. If
this is the case, then the levels of its components might be expected
to increase during senescence.
The protein or mRNA levels of ClpP and some ClpC family members have
been examined in senescing leaves of several species (although rarely
have mRNA and protein in the same species been studied), and none were
found to be induced (Shanklin et al., 1995
; Crafts-Brandner et al.,
1996
, 1998
; Humbeck and Krupinska, 1996
). An exception is the
Arabidopsis ClpC family member ERD1, which, as discussed above, encodes
an mRNA that accumulates during senescence (Kiyosue et al., 1993
;
Lohman et al., 1994
; Nakashima et al., 1997
; Weaver et al., 1998
). The
senescence-associated increase in ERD1 mRNA levels is
intriguing because ERD1 is diverged from both the other Arabidopsis
ClpC family member (AtClpC) and the other known plant ClpCs (Vierling,
1997
; Fig. 5), which suggests that it might play a distinct role within
the plant. One possibility is that ERD1 mediates Clp-dependent
proteolysis during senescence (Nakashima et al., 1997
; Weaver et al.,
1997
, 1998
).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 5.
Dendrogram of selected Clp genes, including all of
the sequenced full-length, higher-plant ClpCs, produced using the
PileUp program from the Genetics Computer Group (Madison, WI) package.
The class to which each sequence appears to belong is indicated on the
right of the dendrogram (although this sometimes conflicts with the
name the sequence was given), and the expression characteristics of the
group are indicated to the right of that (expression patterns have not
necessarily been determined for all of the individual genes). Note that
ERD1, although clearly neither a ClpA nor a ClpB, appears distinct from
the other plant and photosynthetic bacterial ClpCs. Accession numbers
are as follows: E. coli ClpA, spP15716;
Helicobacter pylori ClpA, giAE000525; Arabidopsis ClpC,
giAF022909; Brassica napus ClpA, spP46523; tomato ClpA,
spP31541; tomato ClpC, spP31541; pea ClpC, spP35100;
Synechococcus ClpC, gi755162; B. subtilis
ClpC, spP37571; Arabidopsis ERD1, spP42762; Arabidopsis HSP101,
spP42730; Glycine max SB100, giL35272; Arabidopsis HSP,
gnlZ97336; E. coli ClpB, spP03815;
Synechocystis ClpB, gnlD90915; H. pylori
ClpB, spP71404; and yeast HSP104, spP31539.
|
|
We show here in Arabidopsis that the ERD1 protein is properly imported,
processed, and present within the soluble fraction of the chloroplast
in an in vitro chloroplast import system, indicating that it is present
within the chloroplast in the plant and is therefore potentially able
to interact with ClpP. Although ERD1 mRNA levels increase
during senescence, ERD1 protein levels actually decline abruptly, in
parallel with ClpP, as leaves senesce.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Materials and Treatments
Arabidopsis ecotype Landsberg erecta (Ler)
was originally obtained from the Arabidopsis Stock Center at The Ohio
State University (Columbus). Plants were grown on germination mixture
(Fafard, Agawam, MA) under cool-white fluorescent light (120 µmol
m
2 s
1) in growth
chambers. In most experiments, plants were grown under continuous
light. In the experiments shown in Figures 1 and 3B, plants were grown
under 16 h of light. Under these conditions, plants flowered after
forming approximately eight rosette leaves (cotyledons were not
counted). All plants used in a given experiment were taken from a
single synchronously growing population and harvested in late
afternoon. Only identically aged leaves were pooled.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
ERD1 protein is down-regulated during senescence,
whereas its mRNA is up-regulated. A, RNA and protein blots derived from
the fifth true leaf of wild-type Arabidopsis (ecotype
Ler) probed with ERD1 polyclonal antibodies or labeled
cDNA (left) or with c-myc monoclonal antibodies or labeled DNA (right).
B, RNA and protein blots derived from the fifth true leaf of
Arabidopsis 15myc Ler, which is Ler transformed with a
c-myc-tagged ERD1 genomic clone, and probed as in A. Young leaves
averaged 15 mm and were harvested 16 d after germination; early
fully expanded (exp) leaves averaged 27 mm and were harvested 20 d
after germination; late fully expanded leaves averaged 30 mm and were
harvested 23 d after germination; early senescent (sen) leaves
averaged 15% yellow and were harvested 29 d after germination;
late senescent leaves averaged 70% yellow and were harvested 33 d
after germination. RNA and protein derived from equal volumes of leaf
tissue were loaded.
|
|

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
Protein blots derived from two developmental
series. A, Time course emphasizing the period between early full
expansion and middle senescence. Arabidopsis plants from a synchronous
population grown under continuous light were harvested over a period of
several days, and protein from the sixth true leaf was prepared.
Protein blots were examined with the indicated antibodies. The
photographs indicate the developmental stages of the leaves at each
time. DAG, Days after germination. B, The broader time course shown in
Figure 1A, left, examined with the indicated antibodies. Plants were
grown under a 16-h photoperiod, and protein and RNA from the sixth true
leaf was prepared. BCB is a known senescence-associated gene, ClpP is
the proteolytic subunit of the Clp protease, and Toc75 is a component
of the chloroplast import apparatus. Protein derived from equal volumes
of leaf tissue was loaded. exp, Expansion; sen, Senescence.
|
|
Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting
Leaf extracts were prepared by grinding tissue under liquid
N2 and adding lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1%
Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.7% 2-mercaptoethanol,
and 1 mM PMSF); equal volumes of lysis buffer and frozen,
ground tissue were used. Samples were vortexed and centrifuged, and the
supernatant was added to an equal volume of 2× loading
buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 0.01% bromphenol blue). Equal volumes of
each sample (representing protein derived from equal volumes of leaf
tissue) were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE gels and electroblotted onto
PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Immunodetection was performed as described by
Shanklin et al. (1987)
.
RNA Extraction and Blotting
Total RNA was extracted (RNA Isolator, Genosys Biotechnologies,
The Woodlands, TX). RNA was size fractionated by electrophoresis on 1%
formaldehyde-agarose gels and transferred onto nylon membranes by
capillary blotting. RNA derived from equal volumes of ground, frozen
leaf tissue was loaded in each lane. Probes were derived from the
ERD1 cDNA (Lohman et al., 1994
) and the c-myc cassette of
the plasmid pJR1265 (R. Hampton and J. Rine, personal communication) and 32P labeled by random priming (Prime-a-Gene
kit, Promega). Hybridization was at 65°C overnight in 0.25 M
NaH2PO4, pH 7.4, 7% SDS,
1% casein, and 1 mM EDTA, and membranes were
washed twice for 45 min each in 0.04 M
NaH2PO4, pH 7.2, 1% SDS,
and 1 mM EDTA. Probe hybridization was visualized
with a phosphor imager using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA).
Antibodies
A 1.5-kb ERD1 XhoI cDNA fragment encoding a 507-amino
acid residue peptide corresponding to the Arg-368 to Ile-675 region of
the native ERD1 (accession no. D17582) was cloned into pET28a (Novagen,
Madison, WI). The resulting plasmid, pSAG15exXho, was transformed
into Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3).
Isopropylthio-
-galactoside induction
resulted in the production of an insoluble protein. Induced cells were
lysed by sonication and centrifuged for 20 min at 2000g, and
the insoluble fraction was washed with binding buffer (5 mM imidazole, 4.5 M NaCl,
and 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9). This protein was
resuspended in binding buffer plus 6 M guanidine and affinity purified on a column (HisBind, Novagen) under denaturing conditions according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified protein was dialyzed several times against 60 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, and 1% SDS and used to inoculate rabbits to raise
polyclonal antibodies. BCB antibody was prepared similarly (L.M. Weaver
and R.M. Amasino, unpublished results). c-myc antibody was obtained from Oncogene Science (Manhasset, NY; anti-c-myc monoclonal 9E10.2, IgG1). ClpP antibody was as described by Shanklin et al. (1995)
, OEC
was as described by Camm et al. (1987)
, Toc75 was as described by
Nielsen et al. (1997)
, and RbcS was as described by Akita et al.
(1997)
.
Construction of the myc-Tagged ERD1 Clone and
Arabidopsis Transformation
The genomic sequences used in the construction were obtained from
a 13.7-kb clone derived from an Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia
GEM11
library (a gift from Ron Davis, Stanford University). The c-myc epitope
cassette used was the 6-myc repeat found in pJR1265 (R. Hampton and J. Rine, personal communication). Primers were designed to PCR amplify the
c-myc cassette while introducing ClaI restriction sights
into its 5
and 3
ends. A ClaI site is also present at the
3
end of the ERD1-coding region, at a position corresponding to amino acid 944. A 3.4-kb genomic EcoRI
fragment containing this ClaI site was subcloned into the
vector pGEM11Zf, and the amplified c-myc cassette was inserted into the
ClaI site to yield the plasmid pSAG15genRH2bmyc. The region
containing the c-myc cassette and insertion site was sequenced and
found to be free of errors. The entire 13.7-kb genomic clone, with the
myc-tagged EcoRI fragment from pSAG15genRH2bmyc substituted
for the corresponding wild-type fragment, was cloned in a series of
steps into the XbaI and SalI sites of the binary
transformation vector pPZP111, to give the plasmid pSAG15myc. pSAG15myc
was transformed into Arabidopsis ecotypes Ler and Columbia
using vacuum infiltration (Bechtold et al., 1993
; Bent and Clough,
1998
) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404. Two
kanamycin-resistant Columbia lines and one Ler line were
examined and showed identical ERD1 and myc protein-expression patterns.
The Ler line was used in the work described.
Chloroplast Binding, Import, and Fractionation of ERD1
Chloroplasts were isolated from 8- to 12-d-old pea (Pisum
sativum var Little Marvel) seedlings as described previously
(Bruce et al., 1994
). After isolation, chloroplasts were resuspended to
1 mg chlorophyll/mL import buffer (50 mM
Hepes-KOH, pH 8.0, and 330 mM sorbitol).
Synthesis of precursor to ERD1 was performed using a wheat-germ extract
(Bruce et al., 1994
) with [35S]Met (DuPont/NEN)
for labeling. The template was the ERD1 cDNA clone
pSAG15full, which consists of the complete ERD1-coding
region, the 3
-untranslated region, and a
poly(A+) tail cloned into pBluescript SK; it
lacks the 5
-untranslated region. Import of ERD1 was performed as
follows: Wheat-germ-translated ERD1 (approximately 500,000 dpm/150 µL
import reaction) was added to pea chloroplasts in the presence of 4 mM Mg-ATP and incubated at room temperature.
Aliquots were removed at given times, and import was terminated by
reisolating intact chloroplasts by sedimentation through a 40% Percoll
cushion. Fractions were resuspended in sample buffer and subsequently
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
Binding of ERD1 was performed by incubating wheat-germ-translated ERD1
with chloroplasts for 30 min in the dark at 4°C under low-ATP
conditions (approximately 75 µM). The binding reaction was divided into two equal fractions. One sample was treated with thermolysin and the other sample was not. Protease digestion was allowed to continue for an additional 30 min on ice in the dark. Proteolysis was terminated by adding EDTA to a final concentration of 5 mM, and intact chloroplasts were reisolated by
sedimentation through a 40% Percoll cushion with 5 mM EDTA
present. Fractions were resuspended in sample buffer and subsequently
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
Fractionation of imported proteins was performed as described
previously (Bruce et al., 1994
). ERD1 was imported as described above,
and intact chloroplasts were recovered by sedimentation through a 40%
Percoll cushion. Intact chloroplasts were lysed hypotonically in 200 µL of lysis buffer (25 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 8.0, and 4 mM MgCl2). The lysis reaction was
incubated on ice for 15 min in the dark, and the supernatant and crude
membrane fractions were separated by centrifugation (30 min at
100,000g; model RP 100-ATP, Sorvall). Isolated chloroplastic
crude membrane and supernatant were resuspended in sample buffer and
subsequently analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
 |
RESULTS |
ERD1 Protein Levels Decline during Leaf Senescence, in Contrast to
ERD1 mRNA Levels
Polyclonal antibodies raised to an E. coli-expressed
ERD1 peptide detected an approximately 100-kD protein in green but not senescent leaves (Fig. 1A, bottom left).
Total RNA isolated from the same tissue as the protein samples, when
blotted and probed with labeled ERD1 cDNA, confirmed
previous observations that ERD1 mRNA levels increase during
senescence (Fig. 1A, top left). This suggested that the ERD1 protein,
in contrast to the ERD1 mRNA, is not induced during
senescence. One possible explanation for this unexpected result is that
the polyclonal antibody recognized not ERD1 but a related Clp family
member or some other cross-reacting species. To examine this
possibility, an epitope-tagged ERD1 was constructed. A 13.7-kb genomic
clone containing the entire ERD1-coding region and 3 to 4 kb
of both upstream and downstream sequences was engineered to include six
repeats of a c-myc epitope tag at the C-terminal portion of the ERD1
protein (Fig. 2). This clone was then
transformed into Arabidopsis, and RNA and protein blots were prepared
from transgenic lines.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
Construction of the c-myc-tagged ERD1 genomic
clone. The 13.7-kb ERD1 genomic clone transformed into
plants is diagrammed. R, H, and X, Positions of EcoRI,
HindIII, and XhoI sites, respectively.
The box represents the ERD1 primary transcript. The darkly shaded
portion of the box indicates the area containing the coding region
(introns are not distinguished). The lightly shaded portions indicate
the 5 - and 3 -untranslated regions. Below the diagram (and not to
scale), the C-terminal ends of the myc-tagged and wild-type proteins
are shown.
|
|
In all cases, the protein detected by both the ERD1 and c-myc
antibodies was observed to decline during senescence, whereas RNA
detected with both ERD1 and c-myc DNA probes was observed to increase
(Fig. 1B). When protein and RNA blots derived from nontransformed
plants were examined with c-myc antibody or labeled c-myc DNA, no
signal was detected, confirming that these reagents detect only the
myc-tagged ERD1 mRNA and protein (Fig. 1A, right). This indicates that
the anti-ERD1 polyclonal antibodies recognize the ERD1 protein, which
declines during senescence. All further ERD1 antibody work was done
using the polyclonal antibodies and wild-type plants.
To further characterize the expression pattern of the ERD1 protein in
leaves, a more detailed developmental time course, emphasizing the
period between early full expansion and early senescence, was examined.
Detectable steady-state levels of ERD1 were again present only in
expanding and young fully expanded leaves, and ERD1 became undetectable
between full expansion and early senescence (Fig.
3A). As a positive control for
senescence, the developmental series was examined with antibody to BCB
(Van Gysel et al., 1993
), also known as SAG14, a gene known
to be up-regulated during senescence at both the mRNA (Lohman et al.,
1994
; Weaver et al., 1998
) and protein levels (L.M. Weaver and R.M.
Amasino, unpublished results). BCB became detectable only in late fully
expanded/early senescent leaves, soon after ERD1 became undetectable.
ERD1 is chloroplast localized (see below), and the series was also
examined with antibodies that recognize four other
chloroplast-localized proteins as controls for senescence and for the
state of the chloroplast (ClpP, Toc75, OEC, and RbcS; Fig. 3). These
proteins declined during senescence, as expected, two with kinetics
similar to ERD1 and two more slowly (see ``Discussion''). One of the
proteins that declined in parallel with ERD1, ClpP, is the protease
with which ERD1 has been hypothesized to interact.
Developmental conditions can affect the progression of the senescence
syndrome. Shorter photoperiods in particular can delay the onset of
senescence (Noodén et al., 1996
). The plants used for the
experiments shown in Figure 3A were grown in continuous light. To
determine whether ERD1 was similarly regulated under different
environmental conditions, with respect to both development and the
other genes tested, a second developmental time course derived from
plants grown in 16-h photoperiods was also examined (Fig. 3B). In both
experiments, the different proteins were coordinately regulated with
respect to each other, although the absolute developmental stages at
which they declined or increased varied (e.g. in both cases, ERD1
became undetectable as BCB became detectable, but it first became
undetectable in fully expanded leaves in the experiment shown in Fig.
3A and in early senescent leaves in the experiment shown in Fig. 3B).
This suggests that, although environmental factors can influence the
timing of the senescence program relative to leaf development, the
program itself remains largely constant.
ERD1 Is Localized within the Soluble Fraction of the
Chloroplast
Because ERD1 appears to have an N-terminal transit peptide and is
similar in sequence to the chloroplast-localized AtClpC, we wanted to
determine whether the ERD1 protein is also imported into the plastid.
An expression construct was made using the full ERD1-coding sequence,
and radiolabeled ERD1 protein was produced in a wheat-germ
transcription/translation system. This protein was then introduced into
an in vitro plastid-uptake system (Bruce et al., 1994
). In the presence
of ATP, ERD1 was imported into the chloroplast and processed in a
manner consistent with the N-terminal transit peptide being removed
(Fig. 4A). Under low-ATP conditions, ERD1
also bound the chloroplast but was not imported or processed (Fig. 4B).
These results are consistent with the behavior of known
chloroplast-imported proteins in this system. After import,
chloroplasts were lysed and crude membrane and soluble fractions
prepared, and ERD1 was observed to be present within the soluble
fraction (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that in the cell ERD1 is
present within the chloroplast and likely within the stroma as well.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 4.
ERD1 import, binding, and fractionation using pea
chloroplasts. A, Import of ERD1 into pea chloroplasts was performed as
described in ``Materials and Methods''. Aliquots were removed at
given times, and import was terminated by reisolating intact
chloroplasts by sedimentation through a 40% Percoll cushion. Fractions
were resuspended in sample buffer and subsequently analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and fluorography. B, Binding of ERD1 to pea chloroplasts under low-ATP
conditions. The binding reaction was equally divided into two
fractions. One sample was treated with thermolysin (+) and the other
sample was not ( ). Protease digestion was allowed to continue for an
additional 30 min on ice in the dark. Proteolysis was terminated by
adding EDTA to a final concentration of 5 mM, and intact
chloroplasts were reisolated by sedimentation through a 40% Percoll
cushion with 5 mM EDTA present. C, ERD1 was imported into
pea chloroplasts and fractionated as described in ``Materials and Methods''. All fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
TP, Ten percent of translation product added to the import reaction; M,
crude membrane pellet; S, supernatant fraction; U, unprocessed form of
ERD1; P, processed form of ERD1; MW, Mr
standards.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Recent studies indicate that many, and probably most, genes that
are induced during age-associated senescence (i.e. senescence occurring
in leaves of nonstressed plants progressing through normal stages of
development) are also induced by one or more stresses or stress-related
hormones (Azumi and Watanabe, 1991
; Hsieh et al., 1995
; Stirpe et al.,
1996
; Buchanan-Wollaston and Ainsworth, 1997
; Park et al., 1998
; Weaver
et al., 1998
). It seems likely that in at least some cases these genes
in fact function directly in both senescence and stress responses, and
one role they may be playing is to protect the cell from damage that
may be common to both. It is important to remember in this context that
the senescence syndrome is an active, ordered developmental process,
not simply passive cell death, so cells undergoing senescence must
remain sufficiently healthy to allow the program to progress. The
induction of stress-response systems during senescence may thus
function to help maintain the necessary cellular integrity. Most of the
work describing senescence- and stress-associated gene induction has
been done at the level of steady-state mRNA, under the assumption that
mRNA levels will reflect protein levels and ultimately biological
function. At the mRNA level, ERD1 is one such
senescence-associated gene that is also induced by a variety of
stresses and hormones (Kiyosue et al., 1993
; Nakashima et al., 1997
;
Weaver et al., 1998
).
ERD1 is a particularly interesting example of the class of senescence-
and stress-induced mRNAs because its sequence suggests that it is
localized in the chloroplast, which is a major target of the senescence
syndrome. As a member of the ClpC family, its sequence also suggests
what it might do there, i.e. mediate proteolysis via the Clp system.
The possibility has been proposed that ERD1 might interact with the
plastid-localized ClpP to promote senescence-induced chloroplast
protein degradation or stress-necessitated chloroplast restoration
(Kiyosue et al., 1993
; Nakashima et al., 1997
; Weaver et al., 1997
). It
has been reported that the N-terminal region of ERD1, when fused to GFP
(green fluorescent protein),
targets it to the chloroplast (Nakashima et al., 1997
). Here we
demonstrate in an in vitro chloroplast import system that the native
protein is imported, processed, and localized within the nonmembranous fraction of the chloroplast, presumably the stroma. ClpP is also present within the stroma (Shanklin et al., 1995
), and the two are thus
potentially able to interact.
We also observed similar developmental regulation of the two proteins,
which likewise is consistent with their interaction. Our data, however,
do not show ERD1 to be in the senescing chloroplast; ERD1 protein, in
contrast to ERD1 mRNA, is present at high levels in
expanding and green fully expanded leaves, but it decreases below the
level of detection at or before the onset of visible senescence.
ERD1 mRNA is present at low levels in young leaves, and the
high protein abundance at that time could be explained if the mRNA
present is translated very actively, if the protein produced is very
stable, or both. In senescing leaves, in which mRNA levels are high but
protein levels are below detection, translation may not occur, and any
protein that is produced may be very unstable (perhaps because another
factor, such as ClpP, is not present).
This disparity between ERD1 protein and mRNA levels may indicate that
ERD1 does not play a role in senescence. If so, there are several
possible explanations for the increase of ERD1 mRNA during
senescence. One is that it is an evolutionary relic of some ancestral
gene that was involved in the senescence syndrome. Another is that
ERD1 is functionally a stress-response gene (in addition to
any constitutive functions it might have) and senescence indirectly
activates its transcription by stressing the cell. The other known
plant ClpCs (Shanklin et al., 1995
) and photosynthetic bacterial ClpCs
(Clarke and Eriksson, 1996
) are constitutively present and are not
stress responsive. The ClpC of the nonphotosynthetic bacterium
Bacillus subtilis, in contrast, is known to accumulate as
part of a general stress response (Kruger et al., 1994
). Photosynthesis exposes an organism to oxidative stress, and it has been proposed that
in photosynthetic organisms ClpC may have evolved away from stress
responsiveness and toward constitutive expression to defend against
these constitutive stresses (Clarke, 1997
). As discussed above,
ERD1 mRNA, unlike the other ClpC mRNAs that have been
examined, is induced by a variety of stresses and stress-related
hormones.
It is intriguing that the ERD1 sequence is as similar to the sequence
of the stress-responsive B. subtilis ClpC as it is to that
of the stress-insensitive Arabidopsis ClpC (approximately 48% identity
to both), whereas all other known plant ClpCs are quite similar to each
other (e.g. 88% identity between Arabidopsis and pea ClpC; Fig.
5). In fact, it was recently suggested
based on sequence alone that ERD1 should be described not as a ClpC but
as the founding member of a ClpD family (Vierling, 1997
). It seems
likely that in the future related genes will be identified in other
plants, making the existence of a separate ERD1/ClpD subfamily more
evident.
Finally, it is also possible that ERD1 mRNA accumulation
during senescence has little significance at all, whether evolutionary or stress related. All activity that occurs during senescence need not
be functionally related to it, and it has been pointed out that the
"molecular ramblings of cells going senile" might not be so easy to
distinguish from more biologically relevant processes (Bleecker, 1998
).
It should be noted that at present very few senescence-associated genes
have been examined at the level of protein expression, so it cannot be
predicted just how unusual this disparity actually is between protein
and mRNA levels.
A second model to explain the disparity between ERD1 protein and mRNA
levels is that the ERD1 protein is functionally involved in senescence
but is highly unstable in senescent tissue. This would presuppose that
the protein is biologically active at low levels and that in senescent
tissue high levels of mRNA are required to maintain even this low level
of protein. If ERD1 stimulates general proteolysis in senescing
chloroplasts, it is perhaps not unreasonable that it would also be a
target of the process, and there is evidence that E. coli
ClpA mediates its own degradation (Gottesman et al., 1990
; Maurizi et
al., 1990
). Our results do not allow us to distinguish between these
two models.
ERD1 is present within the chloroplast, which is an early target of
senescence-induced degradation, so it is possible that the
developmental decline of ERD1 simply parallels a general decline in
chloroplasts. ERD1 protein levels, however, decline well before the
onset of leaf yellowing (Fig. 3), i.e. before changes in the chloroplast are apparent (Thomas, 1977
). To explore the significance of
the timing of ERD1 decline, we examined the levels of four other
chloroplast proteins that have different functions and are present in
various compartments. Toc75 is part of the chloroplast import apparatus
and is present within the outer chloroplast membrane (Nielsen et al.,
1997
). ClpP is the proteolytic subunit of the Clp protease and is
present within the stroma (Shanklin et al., 1995
). RbcS is also present
within the stroma (Akita et al., 1997
). OEC is present within the
thylakoid lumen (Camm et al., 1987
). Toc75 and ClpP declined in
parallel with ERD1, before the onset of visible senescence. The CAB
(chlorophyll
a/b-binding) protein
behaved similarly (data not shown). RbcS and OEC, in contrast, both
remained readily detectable throughout the course of the experiment,
although by the later time they had clearly declined (Fig. 3).
Senescence is known to begin at approximately the time of full leaf
expansion in many species (Mae et al., 1987
; Hensel et al., 1993
;
Crafts-Brandner et al., 1996
), and gradual declines in RbcS protein,
correlated with a gradual decline in photosynthesis, have been observed
in other plants (Gepstein, 1988
; Jiang et al., 1993
; Jiang and
Rodermel, 1995
). The coordinated, abrupt declines in the other
molecules is more unusual, however. One interpretation of these results
is that before the onset of visible senescence the decision is made to
no longer maintain the chloroplast, so proteins involved in long-term
maintenance, as opposed to short-term function, are not replaced. This
model suggests that both ERD1 and ClpP are involved in chloroplast
maintenance and that their simultaneous declines before the onset of
visible senescence are markers of a more general, senescence-related
change that occurs in the chloroplast at that time.
Based on its similarity to ClpAs and ClpCs, ERD1 could function as a
chaperonin, repairing denatured proteins; as a protease regulatory
subunit, presenting denatured proteins to the ClpP protease for
degradation; or as both, repairing or degrading as interactions with
other factors dictate (Squires and Squires, 1992
; Wickner et al.,
1994
). In plants, ClpP is encoded by and localized within the
chloroplast, although nuclear-encoded ClpPs with putative chloroplast
transit peptides are present in the genome (Schaller and Ryan, 1995
;
L.M. Weaver, J.E. Froehlich, and R.M. Amasino, unpublished
observations). Little is known of the role of ClpP in plants, although
it appears to be essential, because it is present even within the
minimal plastid of the nonphotosynthetic flowering plant Epifagus
virginiana, which contains only 42 genes, 38 of which specify
components of the plastid gene-expression apparatus (Wolfe et al.,
1992
). In bacteria, it is known that ClpP can interact with several
different catalytic subunits, which are thought to determine its
specificity. We have shown here that ClpP protein levels, like those of
ERD1, decline during senescence. These results are consistent with
studies in which ClpP mRNA was shown to decline during senescence in
other species (Crafts-Brandner et al., 1996
; Humbeck and Krupinska,
1996
). It appears unlikely, however (although it cannot be ruled out),
that either ClpP or ERD1 is involved in proteolysis during
senescence. It seems most likely that ERD1 is involved in chloroplast
assembly or maintenance during normal presenescent growth and,
possibly, like certain of its bacterial ClpC cousins, during stresses.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
1
This work was supported through the Consortium
for Plant Biotechnology Research (grant no. DE-FG02-97ER20280) and the
Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin. L.M.W. was partially
supported by National Institutes of Health training grant no. T32
GM07215.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail amasino{at}biochem.wisc.edu; fax
1-608-262-3453.
Received October 26, 1998;
accepted December 19, 1998.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
Abbreviations:
OEC, oxygen-evolving complex.
RbcS, small
subunit of Rubisco.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank John Shanklin for generously providing the ClpP
antibody and Janet Meehl and Andrew Staehelin for providing the OEC antibodies.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
Akita M,
Nielsen E,
Keegstra K
(1997)
Identification of protein transport complexes in the chloroplastic envelope membranes via chemical cross-linking.
J Cell Biol
136:
983-994
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Azumi Y,
Watanabe A
(1991)
Evidence for a senescence-associated gene induced by darkness.
Plant Physiol
95:
577-583
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bechtold N,
Ellis J,
Pelletier G
(1993)
In planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants.
CR Acad Sci Paris Life Sci
316:
1194-1199
Bent AF,
Clough SJ
(1998)
Agrobacterium germ-line transformation: transformation of Arabidopsis without tissue culture.
In
SB Gelvin,
RA Schilperoort,
eds, Plant Molecular Biology Manual, Vol B7.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1-14
Bleecker A,
Patterson S
(1997)
Last exit: senescence, abscission, and meristem arrest in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
9:
1169-1179
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bleecker AB
(1998)
The evolutionary basis of leaf senescence: method to the madness?
Curr Opin Plant Biol
1:
73-78
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bruce BD,
Perry S,
Froehlich J,
Keegstra K
(1994)
In vitro import of proteins into chloroplasts.
In
SB Gelvin,
RA Schilperoort,
eds, Plant Molecular Biology Manual, Vol J1.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1-15
Buchanan-Wollaston V
(1997)
The molecular biology of leaf senescence.
J Exp Bot
48:
181-199
Buchanan-Wollaston V,
Ainsworth C
(1997)
Leaf senescence in Brassica napus: cloning of senescence related genes by subtractive hybridisation.
Plant Mol Biol
33:
821-834
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Camm EL,
Green BR,
Allred DR,
Staehelin LA
(1987)
Association of the 33 kDa extrinsic polypeptide (water-splitting) with PS II particles: immunochemical quantification of residual polypeptide after membrane extraction.
Photosynth Res
13:
69-80
Clarke AK
(1997)
Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 ClpC.
In
M Gething,
eds, Guidebook to Molecular Chaperones and Protein-Folding Catalysts.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 247-249
Clarke AK,
Eriksson MJ
(1996)
The cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 possesses a close homologue to the chloroplast ClpC protein of higher plants.
Plant Mol Biol
31:
721-730
[CrossRef][Medline]
Crafts-Brandner SJ,
Holzer R,
Feller U
(1998)
Influence of nitrogen deficiency on senescence and the amounts of RNA and proteins in wheat leaves.
Physiol Plant
102:
192-200
[CrossRef]
Crafts-Brandner SJ,
Klein RR,
Klein P,
Holzer R,
Feller U
(1996)
Coordination of protein and mRNA abundances of stromal enzymes and mRNA abundances of the Clp protease subunits during senescence of Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) leaves.
Planta
200:
312-318
[ISI][Medline]
Desimone M,
Weisswichert C,
Wagner E,
Altenfeld U,
Johanningmeier U
(1997)
Immunochemical studies on the Clp-protease in chloroplasts: evidence for the formation of a ClpC/P complex.
Bot Acta
110:
234-239
Gepstein S
(1988)
Photosynthesis.
In
L Noodén,
A Leopold,
eds, Senescence and Aging in Plants.
Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 85-109
Gottesman S,
Clark WP,
Maurizi MR
(1990)
The ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli: sequence of ClpA and identification of a Clp-specific substrate.
J Biol Chem
265:
7886-7893
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Halperin T,
Adam Z
(1996)
Degradation of mistargeted OEE33 in the chloroplast stroma.
Plant Mol Biol
30:
925-933
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hensel LL,
Grbic V,
Baumgarten DA,
Bleecker AB
(1993)
Developmental and age-related processes that influence the longevity and senescence of photosynthetic tissues in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
5:
553-564
[Abstract]
Hsieh HM,
Liu WK,
Huang PC
(1995)
A novel stress-inducible metallothionein-like gene from rice.
Plant Mol Biol
28:
381-389
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Humbeck K,
Krupinska K
(1996)
Does the Clp protease play a role during senescence-associated protein degradation in barley leaves?
J Photochem Photobiol
36:
321-326
[CrossRef]
Jiang CZ,
Rodermel SR
(1995)
Regulation of photosynthesis during leaf development in RbcS antisense DNA mutants of tobacco.
Plant Physiol
107:
215-224
[Abstract]
Jiang CZ,
Rodermel SR,
Shibles RM
(1993)
Photosynthesis, Rubisco activity and amount, and their regulation by transcription in senescing soybean leaves.
Plant Physiol
101:
105-112
[Abstract]
Kiyosue T,
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K,
Shinozaki K
(1993)
Characterization of cDNA for a dehydration-inducible gene that encodes a CLP A,B-like protein in Arabidopsis thaliana L.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
196:
1214-1220
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kruger E,
Volker U,
Hecker M
(1994)
Stress induction of ClpC in Bacillus subtilis and its involvement in stress tolerance.
J Bacteriol
176:
3360-3367
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lindahl M,
Yang DH,
Andersson B
(1995)
Regulatory proteolysis of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein of photosystem II by a light-induced membrane-associated enzymic system.
Eur J Biochem
231:
503-509
[ISI][Medline]
Liu X-Q,
Jagendorf AT
(1984)
ATP-dependent proteolysis in pea chloroplasts.
FEBS Lett
166:
248-252
[CrossRef]
Lohman K,
Gan S,
John M,
Amasino RM
(1994)
Molecular analysis of natural leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Physiol Plant
92:
322-328
[CrossRef]
Mae T, Makino A, Ohira K (1987) Carbon fixation and changes with
senescence in rice leaves. In W Thomson, E Nothnegel, R
Huffaker, eds, Plant Senescence: Its Biochemistry and Physiology.
American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp 123-131
Malek L,
Bogorad L,
Ayers AR,
Goldberg AL
(1984)
Newly synthesized proteins are degraded by an ATP-stimulated proteolytic process in isolated pea chloroplasts.
FEBS Lett
166:
253-257
[CrossRef]
Maurizi MR,
Clark WP,
Katayama Y,
Rudikoff S,
Pumphrey J,
Bowers B,
Gottesman S
(1990)
Sequence and structure of Clp P, the proteolytic component of the ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli.
J Biol Chem
265:
12536-12545
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nakashima K,
Kiyosue T,
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K,
Shinozaki K
(1997)
A nuclear gene, erd1, encoding a chloroplast-targeted Clp protease regulatory subunit homolog is not only induced by water stress but also developmentally up-regulated during senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
12:
851-861
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Nam HG
(1997)
The molecular genetic analysis of leaf senescence.
Curr Opin Biotechnol
8:
200-207
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Nielsen E,
Akita M,
Davila-Aponte J,
Keegstra K
(1997)
Stable association of chloroplastic precursors with protein translocation complexes that contain proteins from both envelope membranes and a stromal Hsp100 molecular chaperone.
EMBO J
16:
935-946
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Noodén LD,
Hillsberg JW,
Schneider MJ
(1996)
Induction of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana by long days through a light-dosage effect.
Physiol Plant
96:
491-495
[CrossRef]
Park J-H,
Oh SA,
Kim YH,
Woo HR,
Nam HG
(1998)
Differential expression of senescence-associated mRNAs during leaf senescence induced by different senescence-inducing factors in Arabidopsis.
Plant Mol Biol
37:
445-454
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Parsell DA,
Sanchez Y,
Stitzel JD,
Lindquist S
(1991)
Hsp104 is a highly conserved protein with two essential nucleotide-binding sites.
Nature
353:
270-273
[CrossRef][Medline]
Schaller A,
Ryan CA
(1995)
Cloning of a tomato cDNA (GenBank L38581) encoding the proteolytic subunit of a Clp-like energy dependent protease (PGR 95-001).
Plant Physiol
108:
1341
[Medline]
Shanklin J,
DeWitt ND,
Flanagan JM
(1995)
The stroma of higher plant plastids contain ClpP and ClpC, functional homologs of Escherichia coli ClpP and ClpA: an archetypal two-component ATP-dependent protease.
Plant Cell
7:
1713-1722
[Abstract]
Shanklin J,
Jabben M,
Vierstra RD
(1987)
Red light-induced formation of ubiquitin-phytochrome conjugates: identification of possible intermediates of phytochrome degradation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:
359-363
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Squires C,
Squires CL
(1992)
The Clp proteins: proteolysis regulators or molecular chaperones?
J Bacteriol
174:
1081-1085
[Free Full Text]
Squires CL,
Pedersen S,
Ross BM,
Squires C
(1991)
ClpB is the Escherichia coli heat shock protein F84.1.
J Bacteriol
173:
4254-4262
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Stirpe F,
Barbieri L,
Gorini P,
Valbonesi P,
Bolognesi A,
Polito L
(1996)
Activities associated with the presence of ribosome-inactivating proteins increase in senescent and stressed leaves.
FEBS Lett
382:
309-312
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Thomas H
(1977)
Ultrastructure, polypeptide composition and photochemical activity of chloroplasts during foliar senescence of a non-yellowing mutant genotype of Festuca pratensis Huds.
Planta
137:
53-60
[CrossRef][ISI]
Van Gysel A,
Van Montagu M,
Inze D
(1993)
A negatively light-regulated gene from Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a protein showing high similarity to blue copper-binding proteins.
Gene
136:
79-85
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Vierling E
(1997)
Chloroplast-localized Clp proteins.
In
M Gething,
eds, Guidebook to Molecular Chaperones and Protein-Folding Catalysts.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 255-258
Wawrzynow A,
Banecki B,
Zylicz M
(1996)
The Clp ATPases define a novel class of molecular chaperones.
Mol Microbiol
21:
895-899
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Weaver LM,
Gan S,
Quirino B,
Amasino RM
(1998)
A comparison of the expression patterns of several senescence-associated genes in response to stress and hormone treatments.
Plant Mol Biol
37:
455-469
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Weaver LM, Himelblau E, Amasino RM (1997) Leaf senescence: gene
expression and regulation. In JK Setlow, ed, Genetic
Engineering, Vol 19: Principles and Methods. Plenum Press, New York, pp
215-234
Wickner S,
Gottesman S,
Skowyra D,
Hoskins J,
McKenney K,
Maurizi MR
(1994)
A molecular chaperone, ClpA, functions like DnaK and DnaJ.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
12218-12222
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wolfe KH,
Morden CW,
Palmer JD
(1992)
Function and evolution of a minimal plastid genome from a nonphotosynthetic parasitic plant.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
10648-10652
[Abstract/Free Full Text]