Plant Physiol. (1999) 121: 207-214
Developmental Expression of Violaxanthin De-Epoxidase in Leaves
of Tobacco Growing under High and Low Light1
Robert C. Bugos,
Sue-Hwei Chang, and
Harry Y. Yamamoto*
Department of Plant Molecular Physiology, University of
Hawaii-Manoa, 3190 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
 |
ABSTRACT |
Violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) is a
lumen-localized enzyme that catalyzes the de-epoxidation of
violaxanthin in the thylakoid membrane upon formation of a
transthylakoid pH gradient. We investigated the developmental
expression of VDE in leaves of mature tobacco (Nicotiana
tabacum) plants grown under high-light conditions (in the
field) and low-light conditions (in a growth chamber). The difference
in light conditions was evident by the increased pool size
(violaxanthin + antheraxanthin + zeaxanthin, VAZ) throughout leaf
development in field-grown plants. VDE activity based on chlorophyll or
leaf area was low in the youngest leaves, with the levels increasing
with increasing leaf age in both high- and low-light-grown plants.
However, in high-light-grown plants, the younger leaves in early leaf
expansion showed a more rapid increase in VDE activity and maintained
higher levels of VDE transcript in more leaves, indicating that high
light may induce greater levels of VDE. VDE transcript levels decreased
substantially in leaves of mid-leaf expansion, while the levels of
enzyme continued to increase, suggesting that the VDE enzyme does not
turn over rapidly. The level of VDE changed in an inverse, nonlinear
relationship with respect to the VAZ pool, suggesting that enzyme
levels could be indirectly regulated by the VAZ pool.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
In the natural environment, the light intensities that plants
receive vary over a wide, dynamic range. When the radiant energy exceeds the capacity of the photosynthetic system, this can result in
overexcitation and photooxidative damage to the photosynthetic reaction
center. A protective mechanism that plants use to deal with excessive
radiant energy involves the interconversions between the carotenoids
violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, and zeaxanthin (VAZ), otherwise known as
the violaxanthin or xanthophyll cycle (Yamamoto et al., 1962
). The
cycle is catalyzed by two enzymes localized on opposite sides of the
thylakoid membrane. Violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) is localized in the
lumen of thylakoids and, in the presence of ascorbate and an acidic
lumen generated by the proton pump, catalyzes the de-epoxidation half
of the cycle (Hager, 1969; Yamamoto et al., 1972). Zeaxanthin
epoxidase, which is localized on the stromal side of the thylakoid
membrane, catalyzes the regeneration of violaxanthin. Epoxidation
proceeds in the dark or under low light and is optimal near pH 7.5 (Hager, 1975; Siefermann and Yamamoto, 1975). The role of zeaxanthin in
protecting the photosynthetic apparatus against the adverse effects of
excessive light was first proposed by Demmig et al. (1987). Further
evidence demonstrates that both antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin, along
with the transthylakoid pH gradient, mediate the non-radiative
dissipation of excess energy as heat (Gilmore and Yamamoto, 1992, 1993;
Gilmore et al., 1995, 1996).
VDE was purified from romaine lettuce to one major polypeptide using
conventional purification techniques and a novel lipid-affinity precipitation step using monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (Rockholm and
Yamamoto, 1993, 1996). VDE has a molecular mass of 43 kD and a pI of
5.4, as determined by two-dimensional IEF/SDS-PAGE. VDE was also
purified from spinach and identified as a 43-kD protein (Arvidsson et
al., 1996). The N-terminal region of the spinach VDE protein was
sequenced and found to be 90% identical to the lettuce VDE N terminus
(Arvidsson et al., 1996; Bugos and Yamamoto, 1996).
The lettuce VDE cDNA was cloned, and verification of the cDNA was
accomplished by expression of an active protein in Escherichia coli (Bugos and Yamamoto, 1996). The expressed enzyme also showed the characteristic inhibition by DTT (Yamamoto and Kamite, 1972). The
lettuce VDE cDNA encodes a polypeptide of 473 amino acids, with a
calculated molecular mass of 54.4 kD (Bugos and Yamamoto, 1996). This
preprotein contains a 125-amino acid bipartite transit peptide for
transport into the chloroplast and thylakoid lumen. VDE cDNAs from
tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis were also
isolated using the lettuce VDE cDNA, and their deduced amino acid
sequences are highly homologous; only nine amino acid positions in the
mature proteins have different amino acids in the three proteins (Bugos
et al., 1998). All three proteins also have 13 invariant Cys residues,
11 of which are localized in a Cys-rich domain (Bugos and Yamamoto,
1996) in which DTT most likely has its effect on the reduction of
disulfide bridges. Niyogi et al. (1998) found that a single base-pair
substitution that changed the last Cys in the Cys-rich domain to a Tyr
abolished all VDE activity in Arabidopsis.
The isolation of the cDNA encoding VDE has provided the opportunity to
study the regulation of the gene. In this report we analyzed the levels
of VDE activity, protein, and mRNA in leaves of mature tobacco plants
to observe changes during leaf development. We analyzed plants
receiving nonsaturating light conditions (in a growth chamber) and
saturating light conditions (in the field). In addition, pigment levels
were quantified to determine if there was any correlation between the
VAZ pool size and the levels of VDE. Our results provide a benchmark
for comparison with transgenic tobacco plants having altered levels of
VDE.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv Xanthi) plants were grown
in plastic pots with potting mix (Supersoil, Rod McLellan, San
Francisco, CA). The plants were watered daily and fertilized
periodically with a commercial liquid fertilizer and a pellet-type
fertilizer in which the fertilizer ingredients are coupled to an
organic base.
The plants were grown under two different environments. One set of
plants was grown in a growth chamber under light provided by
fluorescent and incandescent lamps. The top of the plant received a
photon flux density (PFD) of about 300 µmol
m
2 s1 for a 16-h
light/8-h dark photoperiod, with day/night temperatures of
27°C/22°C. The other set of plants was grown outdoors during the
spring on the university campus under full sunlight in a non-shaded area. The plants received a maximum PFD of 2,400 µmol
m2 s1 with an
approximately 13-h/11-h light/dark photoperiod. The air temperature
during the day reached as high as 29°C, while the night temperature
reached as low as 20°C.
All plants were grown for 6 to 8 weeks and harvested just prior to
appearance of flower buds. Plants were dark adapted for 7 h prior
to analysis. The plants typically had between 26 and 28 leaves. Leaves
were numbered starting from the top of the plant, and leaf no. 5 was
defined as the first leaf to have a midrib length of 9.5 cm. In most
cases, there were four younger leaves preceding leaf no. 5.
Pigment Analysis
Discs (13 mm in diameter) cored from tobacco leaves near the tip
were ground in a tissue homogenizer with acetone and 10 to 15 mg of
CaCO3. Pigments and chlorophylls in 90% (v/v)
acetone extracts were separated and quantitated by HPLC using a
Spherisorb ODS-1 column (Alltech) and solvents A-1 and B, as described
previously (Gilmore and Yamamoto, 1991).
Thylakoid Isolation and Extraction of VDE
Chloroplasts were isolated from tobacco leaf tissue (1-4 g)
essentially as described by Neubauer and Yamamoto (1992). For leaf nos.
5 through 8, leaves were pooled from three plants to obtain sufficient
tissue for chloroplast isolation. The leaves were sliced into small
pieces and macerated three times for 5 s in a blender at low speed
in 75 mL of ice-cold grinding buffer (300 mM sorbitol, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM
KH2PO4, 30 mM
KCl, and 50 mM MES, adjusted to pH 6.1 with KOH) that was
supplemented with 5 mM ascorbate just prior to use. The
homogenate was filtered through a 36-µm-mesh nylon cloth and the
filtrate centrifuged at 5,500g for 1 min at 4°C. The
chloroplast pellet was resuspended in approximately 30 mL of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 6 mM
MgCl2 by vortexing and the resuspension was
incubated on ice for 10 min for chloroplast lysis. Following
centrifugation at 20,200g for 5 min at 4°C, the pellet
containing thylakoids was resuspended in a small volume (0.3-1.0 mL)
of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 6 mM MgCl2. Thylakoids were
lysed with five freeze-thaw cycles using liquid
N2 as described previously (Hager and Holocher,
1994). The suspension was centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 min
at 4°C, and the supernatant was assayed for VDE activity.
VDE Assay
VDE activity in 5 to 40 µL of extract was tested using the in
vitro assay at pH 5.1 and the change in
A502540 as described previously
(Yamamoto, 1985). Fatty acid-free BSA (Sigma) was added to the assay at
a final concentration of 0.1%. Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol from
spinach was obtained from a commercial source (Lipid Products, South
Nutfield, UK) and dissolved in methanol to a final concentration of 270 µM. Violaxanthin was isolated from a saponified
methanol extract from spinach leaves by TLC. Pigments from the
saponified methanol extract were washed into diethyl ether, dried using
a rotary evaporator, and dissolved in a small volume of acetone. An
aliquot of this acetone extract was applied to a silica-gel plate
(Fisher Scientific) and chromatographed using a solvent system of 30%
acetone in hexane. The second major band from the bottom of the plate,
violaxanthin, was scraped from the plate and eluted with methanol.
Purity was assessed by HPLC (Gilmore and Yamamoto, 1991) and
spectrophotometric analysis (Yamamoto, 1985). A 10 µM violaxanthin solution in methanol had a
A441 of 1.5.
One unit of VDE activity is defined as 1 nmol of violaxanthin
de-epoxidized per minute. Activity was calculated from the initial rate
of absorbance change using the difference extinction coefficient of 63 mM1 cm1
(Yamamoto, 1985).
Protein Determination
Protein was determined using a protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad) and
bovine 
-globulin as the standard.
Western-Blot Analysis
Protein (20 µg/lane) extracted from thylakoids by freeze-thaw
was resolved on a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel as described by Laemmli
(1970) and electrophoretically transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore). The blots were blocked for 1 h with 5% (w/v)
nonfat dry milk in TBST (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% [w/v] Tween 20), and probed for
1 h with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (0.5 µg/mL of blocking
solution) prepared against a synthetic peptide from the N terminus of
lettuce VDE (VDALKTCACLLK) (Bugos and Yamamoto, 1996; Rockholm and
Yamamoto, 1996). Blots were developed by immunodetection using alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The relative levels of the
VDE immunoreactive bands were determined using image-analysis software
(SigmaScan, SPSS, Chicago).
Northern Hybridization Analysis
Total RNA was isolated from 500 mg of leaf tissue using a RNA
extraction reagent (TRI reagent, Sigma). The RNA samples had A260/280 ratios of 2.00 ± 0.08. RNA (15 µg/lane) was resolved by electrophoresis in a 0.66 M formaldehyde/1% (w/v) agarose gel (Fourney et al., 1988), transferred by downward capillary blotting to a
nylon membrane (Schleicher & Schuell), and fixed by UV cross-linking (Stratagene). The full-length tobacco VDE cDNA (Bugos et al., 1998) was
used to synthesize 32P-labeled DNA probes by the
random-primed DNA-labeling method (Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983).
Blots were hybridized with the probes at 65°C as described by Church
and Gilbert (1984) and washed at the same temperature. Hybridization
was detected by autoradiography (Biomax MS film, Kodak). The relative
levels of the hybridizing bands were determined using image-analysis
software (SigmaScan).
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Tobacco plants were grown under two different environments, in the
field and in the growth chamber, to analyze the levels of pigments,
chlorophyll, VDE protein, and mRNA in leaves at various stages of
development. The main difference between the two growth environments
was that the growth-chamber-grown plants were exposed to nonsaturating
light conditions, whereas the field-grown plants were exposed to
saturating light conditions for a large portion of the day. PFD in the
growth chamber was adjusted to approximately 300 µmol
m2 s1 at the top of the
plant, with the bottom leaves receiving significantly less light due to
the distance from the light source and shading. The field-grown
plants were exposed to variable light conditions produced by sunlight,
in which the PFD reached a maximum of 2,400 µmol
m2 s1 around
midday.
Although not grown under the same environmental conditions, growth
conditions were similar in that both sets of plants received the same
fertilizer treatment, and the growth chamber was adjusted so that the
temperature and photoperiod were similar to conditions in the field
(see ``Materials and Methods''). Therefore, the leaves of the plants
were analyzed not to only examine the changes that occurred in leaf development, but also to observe if there were differences in the
levels of pigments and VDE when plants were grown under saturating and
nonsaturating light conditions.
Leaf development in tobacco was followed by measuring the length of the
midrib from the youngest leaf (leaf 5) to the oldest leaf (leaf 24)
examined in mature tobacco plants (Fig.
1). Even though leaf expansion was more
rapid in field-grown plants, leaves from both sets of plants reached a
maximum midrib length at leaf no. 20. In contrast, the older leaves
(leaves 21-24) of the field-grown plants showed a sequential reduction
in the midrib length compared with growth-chamber-grown plants, in
which the midrib length was essentially unchanged. This trend in
expansion of the leaf midrib is very similar to that reported for leaf
development (as measured by leaf area) in 3-month-old greenhouse-grown
tobacco plants (Schindler et al., 1994).
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
Leaf development in wild-type tobacco as measured
by leaf midrib length. Plants were grown under nonsaturating light
conditions in the growth chamber ( ) or under saturating light
conditions in the field ( ). Leaf no. 5 was defined as the first leaf
at the top of the plant to have a midrib length of 9.5 cm. Error bars
represent SE values (n = 6 individual
plants). For points lacking error bars, the SE was smaller
than the symbol size.
|
|
Chlorophyll content in tobacco leaves varied depending on the stage of
leaf development. The major difference between the field- and
growth-chamber-grown plants was the reduced levels of chlorophyll in
the youngest leaves of the field-grown plants (Fig.
2). For example, the youngest leaf (leaf
no. 5) from the field-grown plants had almost half the chlorophyll
content of the growth-chamber-grown plants. Chlorophyll content in the
younger leaves of field-grown plants increased rapidly and reached a
peak at leaf no. 14, after which there was a slow decline. Chlorophyll in the younger leaves of the growth-chamber-grown plants also increased
rapidly with chlorophyll content, reaching a maximum earlier (at leaf
no. 10). The chlorophyll content remained essentially constant from
leaf no. 10 to leaf no. 20, after which the chlorophyll content
decreased. Figure 2 shows that the chlorophyll levels in both sets of
plants were similar from leaf no. 14 to leaf no. 24. The loss in
chlorophyll in the oldest leaves most likely indicates that these
leaves were starting to undergo senescence. The chlorophyll a/b ratios were similar for both sets of plants, with the
ratios continuously declining: from 3.67 in leaf no. 5 to 3.09 in leaf no. 24 of the growth-chamber-grown plants, and from 3.96 in leaf no. 5 to 3.05 in leaf no. 24 of the field-grown plants. A similar trend in
chlorophyll content per leaf area was reported previously in leaves
from 3-month-old tobacco plants grown in a greenhouse (Schindler et
al., 1994).
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
Development of total chlorophyll (Chl) content in
wild-type tobacco plants grown under nonsaturating light conditions in
the growth chamber () or under saturating light conditions in the
field (). Error bars represent SE values
(n = 5 individual plants).
|
|
Pigments in tobacco leaves were quantitated by HPLC to observe how the
levels change during leaf development. Leaf discs from dark-adapted
plants were cored near the leaf tip, since this part of the leaf would
likely have the most exposure to light. Neoxanthin and 
-carotene
were found in nearly identical levels in field- and
growth-chamber-grown plants when based on the total chlorophyll content
(Fig. 3). The levels of these pigments
remained essentially consistent throughout leaf development, suggesting
that there was a very tight regulation of the levels of these two
pigments with respect to total chlorophyll. The level of lutein,
however, was higher in field-grown than in growth-chamber-grown plants throughout most of leaf development. In both sets of plants, the level
was somewhat greater in the youngest leaves up to leaf no. 10, after
which the level stayed fairly constant.
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
Pigment levels and VAZ pool of wild-type tobacco
leaves based on total chlorophyll (Chl) determined by HPLC. Error bars
represent SE values (n = 5 individual
plants). For points lacking error bars, the SE was smaller
than the symbol size. , Neoxanthin, growth chamber; , neoxanthin,
field;  , -carotene, growth chamber;  , -carotene, field;
 , lutein, growth chamber;  , lutein, field;  , VAZ, growth
chamber;  , VAZ, field.
|
|
Demmig-Adams et al. (1996) reported that the levels of lutein and
-carotene in Smilax australis in sun and shade leaves on a per-unit chlorophyll basis were increased by 40% to 60% in the sun
leaves, whereas neoxanthin levels remained unchanged. The shade and sun
leaves received a peak PFD of 30 and 1,500 µmol m2 s1 at midday,
respectively. In another study analyzing sun and shade leaves from
various plant species, the levels of -carotene were higher, the
levels of neoxanthin remained unchanged, and there was no consistent
general difference in lutein content when these pigments were expressed
on a per-chlorophyll basis (Demmig-Adams and Adams, 1992). Even though,
except for the unchanged -carotene levels, our data are in agreement
with these earlier analyses, the similarity must be viewed cautiously.
Although there was nearly an 8-fold difference in the high- and
low-light growth conditions, a PFD of 300 µmol
m2 s1 cannot be
considered shade conditions. Nevertheless, the trends between high- and
low-light conditions paralleled those of light and shade plants,
respectively.
Unlike the other pigments, the VAZ pool differed significantly between
the two sets of plants (Fig. 3). The levels of VAZ on a chlorophyll
basis remained higher throughout development in the field-grown plants.
VAZ levels (nmol mol
chlorophyll a + b) in the field-grown plants
ranged from 134.49 ± 5.76 in leaf no. 5 to 91.31 ± 11.11 in
leaf no. 24, whereas the levels ranged from 85.88 ± 4.17 in leaf
no. 5 to 56.12 ± 2.47 in leaf no. 24 of the growth-chamber-grown
plants. It is well documented that the size of the xanthophyll cycle
pool on a per-unit chlorophyll basis is lower in shade-adapted plants
than in sun-adapted plants (Thayer and Björkman, 1990;
Demmig-Adams and Adams, 1992; Demmig-Adams et al., 1995, 1996). In our
study, both types of plants also showed a gradient in the VAZ pool that
decreased from the top to bottom leaves. This effect may have been due
to leaf aging, but an effect of shading is also possible. The VAZ pool had a sudden drop in leaf nos. 22 and 24 of the field-grown plants (Fig. 3). These leaves on average were shorter than the leaves directly
above (Fig. 1), so the level of shading of the leaf tip was even
greater.
The gradual vertical decrease in the VAZ pool was a direct consequence
of samples being collected from the same area of the leaf. This
sampling method cannot consider the variation in the VAZ pool that can
occur within a leaf. For example, when the VAZ pool size was analyzed
in two leaves of one of the field-grown plants, it differed greatly. In
leaf no. 18, a canopy-shaded leaf, the pool was 105.13 nmol VAZ
mol chlorophyll
a + b at the leaf tip and 55.06 nmol VAZ
mol chlorophyll
a + b near the leaf petiole. This indicates that, in this particular leaf, the VAZ pool size can differ across the leaf
by almost 50%. In contrast, leaf no. 8 from the same plant, a
virtually non-shaded leaf, had a pool size of 118.62 nmol VAZ mol chlorophyll
a + b at the leaf tip and 122.26 nmol VAZ
mol chlorophyll
a + b near the leaf petiole.
Prior to performing the analysis of VDE activity in leaves at various
stages of leaf development, we observed that some component in the
freeze-thaw extracts was inhibitory to VDE activity. When VDE activity
was assayed in an extract from freeze-thawed intact chloroplasts
(including both stromal and lumen components) from leaf no. 8 of a
growth-chamber-grown plant, the specific activity of VDE decreased
about 360% as the amount of extract was increased from 10 to 40 µL
in the assay. The results were much less dramatic when VDE was
extracted from thylakoids using the freeze-thaw method (stromal
components were washed away prior to freeze-thaw). A moderate
inhibition of VDE activity occurred only when more than 40 µL of
extract was used in the assay. This suggests that the inhibitory
component was mainly from the stroma.
All assays in this study used either 5 or 10 µL of extract from
freeze-thawed thylakoids, except for leaf nos. 5 and 6, which used 40 µL of extract. In an earlier report, zeaxanthin epoxidase activity in
chloroplasts from lettuce was stimulated by the addition of BSA to the
reaction assay (Siefermann and Yamamoto, 1975). This was attributed to
BSA presumably binding fatty acids that were inhibitory to the
zeaxanthin epoxidase. To test the effect on the in vitro VDE assay,
fatty acid-free BSA was added to the assay at concentrations ranging
from 0.05% to 0.20%. The addition of 0.1% (w/v) BSA produced
the optimal result, enhancing VDE activity by approximately 45% in two
separate experiments using enzyme extracted from leaf no. 8 of a
growth-chamber-grown plant. Therefore, 0.1% BSA was added to all VDE
assays in this study.
VDE activity was measured throughout leaf development in one
field-grown and one growth-chamber-grown plant. When activity was based
on total protein extracted from thylakoids by the freeze-thaw method,
the specific activity in both plants was very low in the youngest
leaves (Fig. 4A). The activity in the
growth-chamber-grown plant continued to increase, whereas activity in
the field-grown plant reached a maximum at leaf no. 16 and then
gradually decreased in the older leaves. The data show that there was a
large divergence in VDE activity in leaf nos. 16 through 24. However,
the data are somewhat misleading because of the difference in the
amount of protein extracted by the freeze-thaw method. In the
growth-chamber-grown plant, the extractable protein per gram of fresh
weight tissue reached a maximum at leaf no. 15 and then gradually
decreased (data not shown). In the field-grown plant, the amount of
extractable protein continued to increase to leaf no. 24. In fact, the
levels of extractable protein were between 77% and 83% greater in
leaf nos. 22 through 24 in the field-grown plant. If the VDE levels were normalized for the amount of protein extracted, they would be
similar for the two plants. The levels of VDE protein in the freeze-thaw extracts were also analyzed by western blotting using a
polyclonal antibody prepared against a synthetic peptide from the N
terminus of lettuce VDE (Bugos and Yamamoto, 1996; Rockholm and
Yamamoto, 1996). VDE activity (in units per milligram of protein) correlated very well with the relative levels of VDE protein as determined from western blots for both plants (data not shown).
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 4.
Violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity in wild-type
tobacco leaves based on total protein (A), total chlorophyll (Chl) (B),
and leaf area (C). Enzyme assays were performed in duplicate from
enzyme extracted from a single tobacco plant, except for leaf nos. 5 through 8, which were a pooled sample from three tobacco plants.
Regression curves were calculated using scientific graphing software
(SigmaPlot, SPSS) , Field-grown plants; , growth-chamber-grown
plants.
|
|
When the specific activity of VDE was expressed on a total chlorophyll
or leaf area basis, a different trend was observed. Again, in both
plants VDE activities were very low in the youngest leaves (Fig. 4, B
and C). However, there was a more rapid increase in the level of VDE in
the field-grown plant until leaf no. 18, after which the activities
were similar between the two plants. The specific activity in the
growth-chamber-grown plant shows that the VDE levels increased in a
linear manner. The rapid increase of VDE in the field-grown plant
suggests that the increased intensity of light has an effect on
inducing higher levels of VDE.
The expression patterns of VDE transcripts were determined by
northern-blot analysis from the same leaf tissue used for determining VDE activity. The RNA blots of both plants indicated a biphasic pattern
of expression, with maximal expression in the youngest leaves followed
by a substantial decrease in VDE transcript level and a second peak of
VDE transcript at leaf no. 18 or leaf no. 20 (Fig.
5A). The second peak in the biphasic
pattern of expression was not as strong as the VDE transcript levels in
the youngest leaves. The 1.7-kb hybridizing band shown in Figure 5A was
the only signal detected on the northern blot following
autoradiography. Overall, the VDE transcript levels were higher in
leaves of the field-grown plant (the blots were hybridized with the
same probe and exposed to the same piece of film), with greater levels
of VDE transcript expressed for a longer duration in the youngest leaves of the field-grown plant (leaf nos. 6-12) compared with the
growth-chamber-grown plant (leaf nos. 6 and 8) (Fig. 5).
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 5.
Developmental pattern of VDE transcript and
activity in wild-type tobacco. A, RNA blots of total RNA (15 µg/lane)
isolated from leaves of a growth-chamber-grown and a field-grown plant.
RNA samples are from same leaf tissue used for determining VDE specific
activity. The blots were probed with the full-length tobacco VDE cDNA.
The hybridizing signals are approximately 1.7 kb. Ethidium bromide
staining of rRNA is shown below each blot. B, VDE specific activity
based on total chlorophyll (Chl) as reported in Figure 4B. The error
bars represent SE values (n = two
assays). The relative VDE mRNA levels were determined from the RNA
blots. The plot labeled with the open inverted triangles represents the
relative VDE mRNA levels determined from another field-grown plant in
which the odd-numbered leaves were analyzed to show the reproducibility
of the RNA-blot analysis. The blots were digitized and the signals
quantified according to area and average intensity using image analysis
software. A value of 100% on the ordinate represents the maximum
steady-state mRNA detected within the experiment.
|
|
The increased duration of greater VDE transcript level in the youngest
leaves of the field-grown plant correlates with the rapidly increased
levels of VDE specific activity based on chlorophyll or leaf area
measured in the same leaves (Figs. 4, B and C, and 5B). This suggests
that the increased light intensity in the field-grown plant may induce
increased levels of VDE transcript and protein. However, the relative
level of VDE transcripts seem to peak earlier than the levels of VDE
specific activity. The reason for this pattern of expression is not
entirely understood. Since the VDE activity levels remain high in the
middle to later stages of leaf development, when transcript levels are
very low, it appears that the VDE protein either does not turn over
rapidly or does not turn over at a single rate during development.
It was recently demonstrated that when spinach plants were shifted from
low light (100-250 µmol m2
s1) to high light (950 µmol
m2 s1), VDE activity
decreased 15% to 30% on the day following the shift to high light
(Eskling and Åkerlund, 1998). The reduced activity was due to a
decrease in the level of VDE protein as determined by western-blot
analysis. The level of VDE protein was 15% to 30% less in spinach
plants after exposure to 5, 6, and 7 d of high light. In contrast,
the VAZ pool size based on total chlorophyll doubled on the d 3 of
exposure to high light. This may suggest that the level of VDE changes
in an inverse relationship with respect to the VAZ pool.
Our results also seem to suggest that the younger tobacco leaves had a
larger VAZ pool and lower VDE levels, whereas the older leaves had a
lower VAZ pool and higher VDE levels. In fact, plotting the VDE
activity based on total chlorophyll (data from Fig. 4B) for the various
leaves versus the VAZ pool based on total chlorophyll (data from Fig.
3) shows an inverse nonlinear relationship for both the
growth-chamber-grown and field-grown plants (Fig.
6). All of the data fit the inverse trend
well except two points representing the values for leaf nos. 22 and 24 of the field-grown plant. These data were not included in the nonlinear
regression analysis because the sudden drop in the VAZ pool in these
particular leaves caused these points to digress from the trend (Fig.
3). Further research is needed to focus more clearly on whether the VDE
promoter is regulated by light and if VDE levels are regulated
indirectly by the VAZ pool.
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 6.
Relationship between VDE specific activity based
on total chlorophyll (Chl) (data from Fig. 4B) versus the VAZ pool
based on total chlorophyll (data from Fig. 3) in leaves of both
field-grown and growth-chamber-grown plants. Regression curves were
calculated using scientific graphing software (SigmaPlot).
|
|
| |
FOOTNOTES |
1
This work was supported by the U.S. Department
of Energy, Division of Energy Biosciences (grant no.
DE-FG03-92ER20078).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail yamamoto{at}hawaii.edu; fax
808-956-3542.
Received December 7, 1998;
accepted May 30, 1999.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Tarana J. Mohamed for technical assistance and Amy S. Verhoeven for reviewing the manuscript.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
Arvidsson P-O,
Bratt CE,
Carlsson M,
Åkerlund H-E
(1996)
Purification and identification of the violaxanthin deepoxidase as a 43 kDa protein.
Photosynth Res
49:
119-129
[CrossRef]
Bugos RC,
Hieber AD,
Yamamoto HY
(1998)
Xanthophyll cycle enzymes are members of the lipocalin family, the first identified from plants.
J Biol Chem
273:
15321-15324
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bugos RC,
Yamamoto HY
(1996)
Molecular cloning of violaxanthin de-epoxidase from romaine lettuce and expression in Escherichia coli.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
6320-6325
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Church GM,
Gilbert W
(1984)
Genomic sequencing.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
81:
1991-1995
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Demmig B,
Winter K,
Krüger A,
Czygan F-C
(1987)
Photoinhibition and zeaxanthin formation in intact leaves: a possible role of the xanthophyll cycle in the dissipation of excess light energy.
Plant Physiol
84:
218-224
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Demmig-Adams B,
Adams WW III
(1992)
Carotenoid composition in sun and shade leaves of plants with different life forms.
Plant Cell Environ
15:
411-419
[CrossRef]
Demmig-Adams B,
Adams WW III,
Logan BA,
Verhoeven AS
(1995)
Xanthophyll cycle-dependent energy dissipation and flexible photosystem II efficiency in plants acclimated to light stress.
Aust J Plant Physiol
22:
249-260
Demmig-Adams B,
Gilmore AM,
Adams WW III
(1996)
In vivo functions of carotenoids in higher plants.
FASEB J
10:
403-412
[Abstract]
Eskling M,
Åkerlund H-E
(1998)
Changes in the quantities of violaxanthin de-epoxidase, xanthophylls and ascorbate in spinach upon shift from low to high light.
Photosynth Res
57:
41-50
[CrossRef]
Feinberg AP,
Vogelstein B
(1983)
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.
Anal Biochem
132:
6-13
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fourney RM,
Miyakoshi J,
Day RS III,
Paterson MC
(1988)
Northern blotting: efficient RNA staining and transfer.
Focus
10:
5-7
Gilmore AM,
Hazlett TL,
Debrunner PG,
Govindjee
(1996)
Photosystem II chlorophyll a fluorescence lifetimes and intensity are independent of the antenna size differences between barley wild-type and chlorina mutants: photochemical quenching and xanthophyll cycle-dependent nonphotochemical quenching of fluorescence.
Photosynth Res
48:
171-187
[CrossRef]
Gilmore AM,
Hazlett TL,
Govindjee
(1995)
Xanthophyll cycle-dependent quenching of photosystem II chlorophyll a fluorescence: formation of a quenching complex with a short fluorescence lifetime.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
2273-2277
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gilmore AM,
Yamamoto HY
(1991)
Resolution of lutein and zeaxanthin using a non-endcapped, lightly carbon-loaded C18 high-performance liquid chromatographic column.
J Chromatogr
543:
137-145
[CrossRef][ISI]
Gilmore AM,
Yamamoto HY
(1992)
Dark induction of zeaxanthin-dependent nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching mediated by ATP.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
1899-1903
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gilmore AM,
Yamamoto HY
(1993)
Linear models relating xanthophylls and lumen acidity to non-photochemical fluorescence quenching: evidence that antheraxanthin explains zeaxanthin-independent quenching.
Photosynth Res
35:
67-78
[CrossRef]
Hager A
(1969)
Lichtbedingte pH-Erniedrigung in einem Chloroplasten-Kompartiment als Ursache der enzymatischen Violaxanthin- 
Zeaxanthin-Umwandlung; Beziehungen zur Photophosphorylierung.
Planta
89:
224-243
[CrossRef]
Hager A
(1975)
Die reversiblen, lichtabhängigen Xanthophyllumwandlungen im Chloroplasten.
Ber Dtsch Bot Ges Bd
88:
27-44
Hager A,
Holocher K
(1994)
Localization of the xanthophyll-cycle enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase within the thylakoid lumen and abolition of its mobility by a (light-dependent) pH decrease.
Planta
192:
581-589
Laemmli UK
(1970)
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
Neubauer C,
Yamamoto HY
(1992)
Mehler-peroxidase reaction mediates zeaxanthin formation and zeaxanthin-related fluorescence quenching in intact chloroplasts.
Plant Physiol
99:
1354-1361
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Niyogi KK,
Grossman AR,
Björkman O
(1998)
Arabidopsis mutants define a central role for the xanthophyll cycle in the regulation of photosynthetic energy conversion.
Plant Cell
10:
1121-1134
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Rockholm DC, Yamamoto HY (1993) Purification of violaxanthin
de-epoxidase by lipid affinity precipitation. In HY
Yamamoto, CM Smith, eds, Photosynthetic Responses to the Environment.
American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, p 237
Rockholm DC,
Yamamoto HY
(1996)
Violaxanthin de-epoxidase: purification of a 43-kilodalton lumenal protein from lettuce by lipid-affinity precipitation with monogalactosyldiacylglyceride.
Plant Physiol
110:
697-703
[Abstract]
Schindler C,
Reith P,
Lichtenthaler HK
(1994)
Differential levels of carotenoids and decrease of zeaxanthin cycle performance during leaf development in a green and an aurea variety of tobacco.
J Plant Physiol
143:
500-507
Siefermann D,
Yamamoto HY
(1975)
Properties of NADPH and oxygen-dependent zeaxanthin epoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: a transmembrane model for the violaxanthin cycle.
Arch Biochem Biophys
171:
70-77
[CrossRef][Medline]
Thayer SS,
Björkman O
(1990)
Leaf xanthophyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC.
Photosynth Res
23:
331-343
[CrossRef]
Yamamoto HY
(1985)
Xanthophyll cycles.
Methods Enzymol
110:
303-312
Yamamoto HY,
Kamite L
(1972)
The effects of dithiothreitol on violaxanthin de-epoxidation and absorbance changes in the 500 nm region.
Biochim Biophys Acta
267:
538-543
[Medline]
Yamamoto HY,
Kamite L,
Wang Y-Y
(1972)
An ascorbate-induced absorbance change in chloroplasts from violaxanthin de-epoxidation.
Plant Physiol
49:
224-228
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Yamamoto HY,
Nakayama TOM,
Chichester CO
(1962)
Studies on the light and dark interconversions of leaf xanthophylls.
Arch Biochem Biophys
97:
168-173
Top
Abstract
Introduction
