|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, June 2000, Vol. 123, pp. 443-452
UPDATE ON SIGNALING
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The formation of nitrogen-fixing
nodules in leguminous plants involves a subtle, two-way interaction
between a bacterium and its host plant. The host plant produces
signaling molecules, e.g. flavonoids, to which the bacterium responds,
generating its own set of signaling molecules, the Nod factors. The
latter are lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) and are responsible for the
specificity in the symbiotic relationship between a bacterium and its
host during nodule development (Long, 1996
; Schultze and Kondorosi,
1998
). In response to Nod factors, the root hair of the susceptible
plant undergoes a deformation that leads to entrapment and invasion of
the bacterium. While isolated Nod factors are unable to induce the
formation of infection threads, they are capable of stimulating the
early steps of a pre-infection thread formation and root hair
deformation (Fig. 1), and thus their use
permits the experimental analysis of the initial events in signal
transduction leading to nodules. Among the most rapid responses
described are those involving changes in membrane potential and certain
ions, notably Ca2+, Cl
,
and H+. Given the well-recognized regulatory and
physiological roles of these ions, it seems important to generate a
consensus regarding not only the temporal nature of their response
after the application of Nod factors, but their spatial characteristics
and choreography. Together, these pieces of information could
contribute fundamentally in our quest to decipher the primary events
that underlie the initial response of the host plant to Nod factors. In
the last few years, there have been several reports that directly
address these issues, and for that reason it seems appropriate to
review the progress that has been made and to provide direction for
future endeavors.
|
| |
Nod FACTORS CAUSE A DEPOLARIZATION OF THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ehrhardt et al. (1992)
first noted that alfalfa (Medicago
sativa) root cells, impaled with microelectrodes, exhibited a
transient depolarization of the membrane potential of 20 mV in response to Rhizobium meliloti cell-free filtrates. The
depolarization was desensitized by repeated exposure to these factors
and was not observed in a non-legume (tomato cells), suggesting host
specificity. An important contribution of this work was the observation
that purified Nod factor from R. meliloti (NodRm-IV[S])
maintained the capability to induce the membrane depolarization. This
single assay has provided a useful tool for dissecting the mechanism of
Nod signal perception in early nodulation. Application of purified Nod
factors induced a depolarization starting 30 to 60 s after the
factors first reached the root cells. Once initiated, depolarization was slow, with a maximum response being reached in an average of
540 s. The electrical membrane response was dose dependent, having
its major effect at 10
8 and
10
7 M Nod factor, which
is the same range that induces root hair deformation. Repolarization of
the membrane potential occurs spontaneously over 25 to 30 min even in
the presence of Nod factors.
The findings of Ehrhardt et al. (1992)
have been confirmed and extended
by Kurkdjian (1995)
and by Felle et al. (1995)
, who routinely recorded
depolarizations of 20 to 40 mV in alfalfa. Kurkdjian (1995)
reported
that repolarization of the plasma membrane actually occurs in two
steps: an initial fast phase occurs from 30 to 60 s, during which
the membrane potential recovers to about one-half the value of the
total depolarization and remains stable for a few minutes. The second
phase is usually slower, lasting about 15 min, although the length may
be variable. Felle et al. (1995)
further showed that under optimal
concentrations of Nod factor (3 × 10
8
M) and with improved instrument sensitivity, the
depolarization response exhibits a delay of only 15 s. Detailed
molecular specificity has also been established, with the finding that
those factors that are most active in producing root hair deformation
are the ones that also elicit the membrane depolarization.
Curiously, however, while non-legumes do not respond, it was noted that
a Nod (
) mutant of alfalfa (MN NN-1008) unable to undergo
root hair curling displayed membrane depolarization, although weakly
(Felle et al., 1995
). There is some disagreement concerning which cell
types show a response, with Kurkdjian (1995)
allowing that bulging
epidermal cells, i.e. those initiating a root hair, were
very sensitive, while those that were not bulging were
insensitive. In contrast, Felle et al. (1995)
reported that epidermal
cells in the root hair zone respond with membrane depolarization, as do
root hairs. Felle et al. (1995)
also showed that the depolarization event is preceded by a small, brief, but clearly detectable
hyperpolarization of the membrane potential, which may have some
function. They also note that the Nod-induced depolarization does not
provoke a change in membrane conductance (Felle et al., 1995
). In a
more recent study, Felle et al. (1998)
addressed the mechanism by which the depolarization is generated, and concluded, based on studies using
stationary ion-selective extracellular electrodes, that Cl
efflux in response to elevated cytosolic
[Ca2+] is responsible for the membrane
depolarization. In this model, charge balance would be provided by
K+ efflux and re-polarization through the
activity of the H+ pump, two general features of
most plant electrophysiological responses. Felle et al. have since
demonstrated the necessity of the rise in cytosolic
Ca2+ for activation of downstream events such as
Cl
efflux and membrane depolarization (Felle et
al., 1999a
). (Further discussion of Ca2+ issues
will occur in a later section of this Update.)
Despite the unique and specific features of the Nod factor-induced
membrane depolarization, it does not appear to be the primary signal
event. First, it appears only after 15 s, which is at best equal
to or slower than reported changes in intracellular pH or extracellular
Ca2+ (see below). In addition, membrane potential
depolarization is a reasonably common event in plant cells (Felle et
al., 1995
), and the circumstances under which they are recorded are
rather artificial compared with the plant growing in soil. Under
laboratory conditions, the entire root is flooded by Nod factor, very
likely eliciting a more pronounced, global effect on the membrane
potential than that caused by soil bacteria, which, by contrast, would
probably induce a much more localized effect (Felle et al., 1995
). It
seems likely, therefore, that modulation of the membrane properties for
other ions, notably Ca2+ and
H+, is responsible both for the initial signal
transduction events and for the downstream transmission of this signal.
| |
Nod FACTORS ALTER INTRACELLULAR AND EXTRACELLULAR pH |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An important contribution to the understanding of Nod signal
perception was provided by Felle et al. (1996)
with the demonstration that there is a rapid (within 15 s) cytoplasmic alkalinization of
0.2 to 0.3 pH units in alfalfa root hair cells in response to Nod
factors. This response was induced with 10
8
M Nod factor; a subsequent response with a higher
concentration was not observed, indicating a desensitization of the
cells. Although the non-sulfated variants are essentially inactive in
inducing root hair deformation (Schultze et al., 1992
) and membrane
depolarization (Felle et al., 1996
), these molecules can induce
cytoplasmic alkalinization. It is even possible to generate an additive
response when the non-sulfated factor is followed by the sulfated Nod
factor. This lack of a causal linkage between membrane potential
depolarization and alkalinity increase allowed the authors to propose a
hypothesis based on an independent perception system for the sulfated
and unsulfated molecules (Felle et al., 1996
). Both perception systems might have evolved from a common ancestor, and one was selected during
evolution to trigger symbiosis to sulfated Nod factors. On the other
hand, the perception system for non-sulfated Nod factors may represent
an evolutionary relic that is still functional and able to recognize
undecorated Nod signal structures (Felix et al., 1993
; Baureithel et
al., 1994
; Staehelin et al., 1994
).
Given the alkalinization of the cytosol in response to Nod factors, a
question is raised concerning the status of H+ in
the space surrounding the root hair. It might be predicted that an
increase of pH within the cell would be coupled with a decrease of pH
in the surrounding space. Using a stationary ion-selective electrode,
Felle et al. (1998)
found that the pH of the medium around the root
hair, while remaining acidic, becomes less so in response to Nod
factors; thus, the pH increases from 6.3 to 6.7. It is not clear why
the pH changes occur in the same direction both inside and outside the
cell. This finding was explained by Felle et al. (1998)
by considering
the linear relationships between the predictably different buffering
capacity of the extra and intracellular compartments. It has long been
known that protons efflux and influx at different levels along the root
(Weisenseel et al., 1979
; Miller, 1989
; Miller and Gow, 1989
).
Current flow (Hamada et al., 1992
) and proton profiles (Peters and
Felle, 1999
) are undoubtedly related to the coordination of root
growth. Thus, it follows that this complexity of proton regulation is
likely to be the result of a system more elaborate than just two
compartments with different buffering properties. For these and other
reasons, further attention to pH is warranted, especially since
H+ may play a central role in the regulation of
Nod-induced events. Indeed, detailed exploration of the pH patterns
along a root using ion-specific vibrating probes would better define
the modifications after challenge with Nod factors, since this
technique is well known to be at least 1 order of magnitude more
sensitive to small gradient alterations than the stationary pH
electrodes used so far (Küthreiber and Jaffe, 1990
; Kochian et
al., 1992
).
An additional concern with the intracellular pH measurements stems from
the realization that an electrode, while providing an accurate temporal
record of change, only samples one small point within the cell.
Although not specified by Felle et al. (1996)
, presumably this position
is located close to the apex of the root hair, but not at the extreme
apex itself. While we accept with confidence that the pH has increased
at the point at which measurements are taken, we cannot extrapolate to
the entire root hair. We know from recent studies of pollen tubes, which are also tip-growing cells, that there are microdomains within
the apical region that express different values of pH; specifically an
acidic domain is found at the extreme apex of the tube, and an alkaline
band 10 to 20 µm back from the tip (Feijó et al., 1999
). Again,
a preliminary numerical assessment of the non-linearities of this kind
of distribution challenge simplistic views based solely on the linear
buffering capacities, which assume that the whole cytoplasm behaves
homogeneously (Feijó et al., 1999
). With these thoughts in mind,
it becomes important in future work to image cytosolic pH in root hairs
and to determine the position of altered cytosolic pH induced by the
application of Nod factors.
| |
Nod FACTORS STIMULATE CHANGES IN THE INTRACELLULAR Ca2+ CONCENTRATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the ions thought to participate in Nod factor-induced signal
transduction, Ca2+ has occupied a prime position
because of its involvement in a myriad of other physiological and
developmental processes (Bush, 1995
). Recently, the importance of
extracellular Ca2+ has been demonstrated by its
necessity for expression of Nod factor-induced genes (Pingret et al.,
1998
). Observations of Ehrhardt et al. (1996)
substantiated early
assumptions on the involvement of Ca2+ in the Nod
signaling pathway by showing that Nod factors induced a spiking of
cytosolic Ca2+ in alfalfa root hairs. The
response starts about 9 min after the application of Nod factors and is
characterized by an oscillation in the cytosolic
[Ca2+] occurring in the perinuclear region at
1-min intervals for time periods of 20 to 60 min. The response has
specificity, since the Nod factors from R. leguminosarum bv
viciae are unable to induce cytosolic
Ca2+ spiking. In addition, tomato root hair cells
failed to show any change in intracellular Ca2+
in response to the Nod factor. The alfalfa mutant MN NN-1008 (Peterson
and Barnes, 1981
) also failed to show Ca2+
spiking, whereas seedlings from the parental lines showed a normal pattern.
Despite the clarity of this study, there are several questions that
remain unresolved. For example, the spiking is very slow to start, and
thus would appear not to be a primary signal event, but rather one that
follows other rapid processes. Also, Ehrhardt et al. (1996)
failed to
denote an apical intracellular Ca2+ gradient or
modulation thereof, despite the increasing number of reports indicating
that these gradients are common features of growing root hairs
(Clarkson et al., 1988
; Schiefelbein et al., 1992
; Jones et al., 1995
;
Bibikova et al., 1997
; Felle and Hepler, 1997
; Cárdenas et al.,
1999
). The above may be related to the observation that the root hair
depicted by Ehrhardt et al. (1996)
was not growing, and thus not
exhibiting a gradient, and therefore may have been incapable of
undergoing deformation.
A more recent study of Vigna root hairs allows that active
Nod factors induce a rapid (within a few seconds) plateau-like increase
in intracellular Ca2+ (Gehring et al.,
1997
). However, the results presented to support their conclusion are
fraught with substantial problems. Gehring et al. (1997)
used the
acetoxy methylester form of both fura-2 and fluo-3, but failed to take
into account the likelihood that perhaps a significant percentage of
the dye is cleaved by esterases present in the cell wall and never
enters the cytosol. That the above criticism has merit derives from
their published graphs (figure 3, A and D, in Gehring et al. [1997])
showing that the alleged intracellular Ca2+
signal, which is elevated in response to Nod factor, declines to a
basal level within a few seconds following the addition of EGTA.
Correspondingly, the application of Ca2+ to the
bathing medium caused a rapid increase in the signal. The rapidity of
these secondary responses, together with the realization that intact
plasma membranes are not freely permeable to either EGTA or
Ca2+, lends support to the conclusion that the
changes in [Ca2+] being reported are largely
derived from the extracellular compartment.
A second major problem is the tendency for the AM-ester
dyes that have entered the cytosol to become sequestered in the vacuole and other membrane-bound compartments. Gehring et al. (1997)
acknowledged that this occurred, but downplayed its significance.
Nevertheless, even a small amount of sequestered dye could be a major
source of confusion, since it will likely be in a compartment with
excess Ca2+, e.g. the vacuole, and
thus generate a saturating signal, shifting the dynamic range of
detection of the camera to levels at which cytosolic signals are lost.
It should also be noted that the results obtained with the two dyes are
quite different, with the fura-2 signal rising fast, but then declining
to the basal level in 13 to 15 min, while the fluo-3 signal continues
to rise beyond 15 min. Finally, the imaging fails to provide evidence
for an apical gradient or for the kinds of precisely localized events
known to occur in root hairs (de Ruijter et al., 1998
; Cárdenas
et al., 1999
).
In defense of the study by Gehring et al. (1997)
, it must be recognized
that the changes they report show specificity for Vigna root
hairs, as opposed to non-legumes, and for active as opposed to inactive
Nod factor. Could it be that the rapid change they report is a Nod
factor-specific event in the cell wall or at the cell wall-plasma
membrane interface? As mentioned above, there are too many
uncertainties about the localization of the reporting dye that make
this study difficult to interpret.
A more compelling observation has been made by de Ruijter et al.
(1998)
, who used acid loading of indo-1 and showed that the apical
[Ca2+] increases 6-fold to 10-fold in root
hairs of Vicia sativa, which have been treated with Nod
factors. Due to the time it takes to load the indicator dye and other
technical problems, their first measurement could not be made until
after 70 min of incubation in Nod factors. The authors also noted that
because of degradation in the signal from the dye, they were unable to
make repetitive observations. Nevertheless, their snapshot approach
reveals a clear apical localization of Ca2+,
which increases following application of Nod factors. However, changes
in the [Ca2+] during time periods earlier than
70 min, when the signal perception is taking place, were not indicated.
More recently, we addressed the question concerning the status of
cytosolic Ca2+ with particular emphasis on the
spatial location of the change that occurs within the first few minutes
following the application of Nod factors (Cárdenas et al., 1999
).
These studies, which have been carried out in root hairs of the Mexican
black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) with dextranated fura-2
microinjected into the hairs, show a modest Ca2+
gradient around 400 nM under control conditions
that increases to 1,500 to 1,800 nM within 5 to
10 min following the application of active Nod factors (Fig.
2). Subsequently, i.e. after 10 to 15 min, oscillatory changes are observed in the region of the nucleus.
However, in these studies the changes within the apical domain standout
because they are more rapid and of greater magnitude than those in the
region of the nucleus and would appear most closely allied with root
hair deformation. Not only does the apical [Ca2+] increase markedly, but it also displays
spatial mobility. Thus, within a few seconds a hot spot can disappear
in one location and reappear in another location, all occurring within
the apical region.
|
Rapid changes in the intracellular [Ca2+]
(approximately 1-2 min) have been reported by Felle et al. (1999b)
in
root hairs of Medicago sativa following application of Nod
factor from R. meliloti. These studies, which used an
ion-selective intracellular electrode as the detection method, reported
a decline in the apical Ca2+ gradient in the
apical-most 5 to 10 µm, with an increase in the shank 20 µm from
the tip (Felle et al., 1999b
). Although these results differ somewhat
from those obtained by ratio imaging (Cárdenas et al., 1999
), it
must be emphasized that the Ca2+-selective
electrode can only measure [Ca2+] at one point
in the cell, while ratiometric ion imaging is able to provide
information on cytosolic [Ca2+] in all parts of
the cell. For instance, by imaging with injected fura-2 dextran,
Cárdenas et al. (1999)
found that the Ca2+
gradient in bean root hair cells can be steep enough to drop to basal
levels within 10 µm from the tip (Fig. 2B), which would not be
detected by the stationary ion probe. Given the chaotic nature of root
hair curling and deformation following application of Nod factors, it
is reasonable to imagine that these fluctuating intracellular
Ca2+ changes observed by ratiometric ion imaging
are a key underlying regulatory component causing rapid spatial change
in the place of vesicle secretion and thus of cell extension.
| |
Nod FACTORS INDUCE RAPID CHANGES IN EXTRACELLULAR Ca2+ |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A role for Ca2+ gains further support from
studies that focus on its changes in the space outside the root hair.
Using the extracellular ion-specific vibrating electrode, Allen et al.
(1994)
first noted changes in the Ca2+ current
that were usually expressed as an influx focused at the root hair tip.
More recently, using stationary ion-selective electrodes to measure the
[Ca2+] in the solution surrounding the root
hair, Felle et al. (1998)
showed that the concentration drops within a
few seconds following the application of the Nod factor. Commenting on
the rapidity of the extracellular Ca2+ reduction,
Felle et al. (1998)
emphasize that it is the very earliest ion change
thus far observed. The importance of this observation is further
underscored by their use of the Ca2+ ionophore
A-23187, which produces an effect on root hairs that is nearly
identical to the application of Nod factor. The interpretation is that
Nod factor induces a rapid Ca2+ influx into the
cytoplasm. Further support for this idea has been provided by
Cárdenas et al. (1999)
, who showed with the ion-selective
vibrating electrode that Nod factor induces, within 5 min of
application, a marked increase in Ca2+ influx at
the hair apex. Not only does the magnitude of the influx increase 2- to
4-fold, but the area over which the influx occurs also increases.
While it is clear that an influx of extracellular
Ca2+ increases quickly following the application
of Nod factors, the underlying cause is less certain. For example, is
the influx due to movement of ions across the plasma membrane and into
the cytosol, or is it due to changes in ion-binding properties within
the cell wall space? The marked remodeling of the cell wall, which must
occur as part of root hair curling, could involve changes in pectic and
other wall components that increase local affinity for
Ca2+ (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993
). Unfortunately,
the extracellular electrode cannot distinguish between ion entry into
the cell wall domain and ions crossing the plasmalemma (Holdaway-Clarke
et al., 1997
). However, Felle et al. (1998)
counter this argument by
allowing that nifedipine, a Ca2+ channel blocker,
inhibits the decline in extracellular [Ca2+],
thus making influx across the plasma membrane seem at least a
significant component of the Ca2+ movement.
Studies by Pingret et al. (1998)
and Felle et al. (1999a)
using
externally applied EGTA indicate that a minimum amount of external
Ca2+ is required for Nod factor-induced gene
expression and membrane depolarization, respectively, indicating the
necessity of external Ca2+ crossing the plasma
membrane for Nod signal transduction. This is further supported by the
finding that external Sr2+ can replace
Ca2+ in Nod factor-induced membrane
depolarization (Felle et al., 1999a
), while Mg2+
cannot substitute for Ca2+ either here (Felle et
al., 1999a
) or in gene expression (Pingret et al., 1998
).
In attempting to resolve these relative contributions of the cell wall
and cytoplasm as Ca2+ sinks, it is also important
to consider the magnitude of the changes observed and to see if they
make sense from what we know about the relationship between intra- and
extracellular Ca2+. By comparing the quantitative
measurements of the intracellular gradient and the extracellular flux,
Cárdenas et al. (1999)
showed that the extracellular flux is
approximately 10-fold greater than that needed to support the
intracellular gradient. While Felle et al. (1998)
do not state the
actual magnitude of decline in the extracellular
[Ca2+], we can infer from the level of the ion
in the medium (100 µM) and from the fact that an
electrode at a distance of 10 µm from the root hair will be
relatively insensitive to ion changes immediately at the root hair
surface, that the actual decline must have been large, especially
compared with the very low cytosolic [Ca2+].
Although we recognize that some of the extracellular
Ca2+ has crossed the plasma membrane, from these
calculations it nevertheless seems likely that a certain amount of the
influx depends upon binding to the cell wall rather than crossing the
plasma membrane into the cytoplast. Resolving this conundrum could add
valuable information to our understanding of the mechanism of Nod
factor action.
| |
CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Considerable evidence indicates that changes in
Ca2+, H+,
Cl
, and the membrane potential are the most
rapid detectable events in root hairs following the application of Nod
factor (Fig. 3). By determining which
particular change is first, and where it occurs spatially, we come
closer to understanding the sequence of events that constitute the
signal transduction cascade leading to nodule formation. We also gain
valuable insight about the function and even molecular character of the
Nod factor receptor. For example, the close temporal proximity of the
application of Nod factors, with an increase in external
Cl
and a decrease in external
Ca2+, indicate that the Nod receptor and the two
ion channels may be closely associated. At the moment the single most
rapid event measured with confidence is the decline of
[Ca2+] in the solution surrounding the root
hair within a few seconds of addition of Nod factor (Felle et al.,
1998
). The fastest the corresponding Ca2+ change
in the cytosol has been observed is 1.5 min after Nod factor
application (Felle et al., 1999b
), but future studies may well show
that it is much faster. Spatially, it seems important that these early
changes in cytosolic Ca2+ are focused at the apex
of the root hair, where they would be ideally positioned to modulate
the secretion necessary for growth and deformation.
|
An alternate view, however, places the Ca2+
influx event downstream from a heterotrimeric G protein-mediated step
(Pingret et al., 1998
). Building upon the selective activities of
various pharmacological agents for G proteins (mastoparan;
pertussis toxin) and phospholipase C (neomycin; U73122), which
appropriately mimic or inhibit Nod-induced gene expression, Pingret et
al. (1998)
suggest that the Nod receptor sequentially acts through a G
protein, and then phospholipase C. Ca2+ is a part
of their scheme, since its omission or blockage by different agents
(EGTA, La3+, ruthenuim red) inhibits mastoparan
induction of Nod-related events. By analogy with established pathways
from animal systems, Pingret et al. (1998)
conclude that
Ca2+ influx follows phospholipase C activation,
although the possibility of a direct interaction between the G protein
and a Ca2+ channel is acknowledged. In our view,
however, their results do not exclude the possibility of a
Ca2+ influx that precedes G protein activation.
We again note the study of Felle et al. (1998)
showing that the
Ca2+ ionophore A-23187 mimics Nod factor-induced
events, lending support to the idea that Ca2+
influx is a primary step in the signal transduction cascade.
Definitive answers to several questions could greatly enlarge our
understanding of Nod factor action and the cascade of events leading to
the formation of the root nodule. First, it is important to measure the
change in intracellular [Ca2+] at short time
intervals (e.g. 1 s or faster) following the application of Nod
factors. If the rapid extracellular concentration decline reported
represents passage of ions across the plasma membrane, this event
should be detected as a rise of cytosolic
[Ca2+] in the root hair. Imaging this response
will be important to tell us exactly where the change occurs. Given the
uncertainty about the localization of AM-ester dyes
(Gehring et al., 1997
), and the technical problems associated
with both acid loading (de Ruijter et al., 1998
) and microinjection
(Cárdenas et al., 1999
), we recommend the use of a new generation
of Ca2+ indicators, e.g. cameleon (Allen et al.,
1999
; Miyawaki et al., 1999
), which can be transfected into the
cell. With an endogenous reporter molecule, it should be possible to
focus more closely on the temporal/spatial changes in intracellular
free [Ca2+] following application of Nod factor.
Second, while the attention above is directed toward Ca2+, it could be informative to also make similar intracellular measurements of H+. As we have emphasized, the studies thus far with intracellular pH electrodes, while providing good temporal resolution, do not resolve matters relating to the spatial localization of H+ changes. Since it is possible that there are closely juxtaposed acidic and alkaline domains within the root hair, it becomes important to document these through ratiometric ion imaging and to further determine how they are modulated by Nod factor.
Third, we also emphasize the importance of measuring ion activity in
the cell wall space. We think it would be possible to purposely trap an
indicator dye in the cell wall space. Bibikova et al. (1998)
have
succeeded in doing this for H+ in root hairs of
Arabidopsis, permitting them to image ion changes associated with root
hair formation. Successful completion of this study could provide
valuable information about the timing and position of cell
wall-associated changes in Ca2+ and
H+ in response to Nod factor.
Finally, in addition to resolving what change occurs first, and where,
in response to Nod factor, it will be informative to further
characterize the downstream components that contribute to root hair
curling, bacterial entrapment, and infection thread formation. Elevated
levels of intracellular Ca2+ would be expected to
facilitate secretion (Battey et al., 1999
); indeed, the mobile
Ca2+ hot spots in the apical domain observed by
Cárdenas et al. (1999)
might be exactly the sort of process
needed to generate the deformation of the root hair. Elevated
Ca2+ and pH could also profoundly alter the
structure and organization of the cytoskeleton (Kohno and Shimmen,
1987
; and Andersland and Parthasarathy, 1993
). There is emerging
evidence that actin microfilaments, which extend as long cables in
untreated root hairs, are markedly fragmented (Cárdenas et al.,
1998
) or induced to form fine bundles (Miller et al., 1999
) shortly
following the application of Nod factors. These observations are
consistent with the activation of a Ca2+
sensitive, actin-binding protein, such as villin that will fragment the
existing bundles (Vidali et al., 1999
). They are also consistent with
the activation of cofilin/ADF, an actin-binding protein that participates in F-actin remodeling in regions of elevated pH
(Gungabissoon et al., 1998
). Regardless of the specific process that is
responsible, the rapid loss of actin microfilament organization will
contribute to the momentary loss of cell polarity and the induction of
a new developmental program leading to root hair deformation and curling, which are necessary for bacterial infection.
Further studies on downstream activities should give attention to the
perinuclear Ca2+ spikes. These would appear to be
at least partly due to intracellular release, and may play a role in
encoding signals to which the nucleus can respond in stimulating gene
expression (Ehrhardt et al., 1996
). Studies aimed at deciphering their
origin or inhibiting their occurrence might produce novel information
concerning their role in root hair deformation.
Although many pieces of the puzzle remain to be elucidated, it seems inescapable that Ca2+ and H+ play central roles in the physiological and developmental events that lead to root nodule formation. Further study of these ions is clearly warranted, since the temporal/spatial characterization of these initial steps could provide fundamental information about the signal transduction cascade induced by Nod factors.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received November 24, 1999; accepted February 14, 2000.
1 This work was supported by Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (grant nos. IN200196 and 212298), by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México (grant nos. N-9608 and N-27698 to C.Q. and nos. B9608 and N-27640 to F.S.), and by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant no. MCB96-01087 to P.K.H.). J.A.F. received fellowships from the Fulbright Foundation, Luso-American Foundation for the Development, and Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and granting from F.C.T. (grant no. PRAXIS/C/BIA/11034/1998). L.C. was supported by a scholarship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnológia and an installation grant for young scientists (no. I 29972-N).
* Corresponding author; e-mail luisc{at}ibt.unam.mx; fax 52-73-136600.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sugiyama, N. Shitan, and K. Yazaki Involvement of a Soybean ATP-Binding Cassette-Type Transporter in the Secretion of Genistein, a Signal Flavonoid in Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 2000 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Navazio, R. Moscatiello, A. Genre, M. Novero, B. Baldan, P. Bonfante, and P. Mariani A Diffusible Signal from Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Elicits a Transient Cytosolic Calcium Elevation in Host Plant Cells Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 673 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Campanoni and M. R. Blatt Membrane trafficking and polar growth in root hairs and pollen tubes J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(1): 65 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Lohar, N. Sharopova, G. Endre, S. Penuela, D. Samac, C. Town, K. A.T. Silverstein, and K. A. VandenBosch Transcript Analysis of Early Nodulation Events in Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, January 1, 2006; 140(1): 221 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E.D. Oldroyd, M. J. Harrison, and M. Udvardi Peace Talks and Trade Deals. Keys to Long-Term Harmony in Legume-Microbe Symbioses Plant Physiology, April 1, 2005; 137(4): 1205 - 1210. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Takemoto and A. R. Hardham The Cytoskeleton as a Regulator and Target of Biotic Interactions in Plants Plant Physiology, December 1, 2004; 136(4): 3864 - 3876. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Esseling, F. G.P. Lhuissier, and A. M. C. Emons A Nonsymbiotic Root Hair Tip Growth Phenotype in NORK-Mutated Legumes: Implications for Nodulation Factor-Induced Signaling and Formation of a Multifaceted Root Hair Pocket for Bacteria PLANT CELL, April 1, 2004; 16(4): 933 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. WHITE and M. R. BROADLEY Calcium in Plants Ann. Bot., October 1, 2003; 92(4): 487 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Shaw and S. R. Long Nod Factor Elicits Two Separable Calcium Responses in Medicago truncatula Root Hair Cells Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 976 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E.D. Oldroyd and S. R. Long Identification and Characterization of Nodulation-Signaling Pathway 2, a Gene of Medicago truncatula Involved in Nod Factor Signaling Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 1027 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fedorova, J. van de Mortel, P. A. Matsumoto, J. Cho, C. D. Town, K. A. VandenBosch, J. S. Gantt, and C. P. Vance Genome-Wide Identification of Nodule-Specific Transcripts in the Model Legume Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, October 1, 2002; 130(2): 519 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Wais, D. H. Keating, and S. R. Long Structure-Function Analysis of Nod Factor-Induced Root Hair Calcium Spiking in Rhizobium-Legume Symbiosis Plant Physiology, May 1, 2002; 129(1): 211 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. D. Oldroyd, E. M. Engstrom, and S. R. Long Ethylene Inhibits the Nod Factor Signal Transduction Pathway of Medicago truncatula PLANT CELL, August 1, 2001; 13(8): 1835 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Wais, C. Galera, G. Oldroyd, R. Catoira, R. V. Penmetsa, D. Cook, C. Gough, J. Dénarié, and S. R. Long Genetic analysis of calcium spiking responses in nodulation mutants of Medicago truncatula PNAS, November 8, 2000; (2000) 230439797. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Walker, V. Viprey, and J. A. Downie Dissection of nodulation signaling using pea mutants defective for calcium spiking induced by Nod factors and chitin oligomers PNAS, November 8, 2000; (2000) 230440097. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Wais, C. Galera, G. Oldroyd, R. Catoira, R. V. Penmetsa, D. Cook, C. Gough, J. Denarie, and S. R. Long Genetic analysis of calcium spiking responses in nodulation mutants of Medicago truncatula PNAS, November 21, 2000; 97(24): 13407 - 13412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Walker, V. Viprey, and J. A. Downie Dissection of nodulation signaling using pea mutants defective for calcium spiking induced by Nod factors and chitin oligomers PNAS, November 21, 2000; 97(24): 13413 - 13418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|