| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, June 2000, Vol. 123, pp. 575-588 Isolation of Arabidopsis Mutants Lacking Components of Acquired Thermotolerance1Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, Texas 79415
Acquired thermotolerance is a complex physiological phenomenon that enables plants to survive normally lethal temperatures. This study characterizes the temperature sensitivity of Arabidopsis using a chlorophyll accumulation bioassay, describes a procedure for selection of acquired thermotolerance mutants, and provides the physiological characterization of one mutant (AtTS02) isolated by this procedure. Exposure of etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings to 48°C or 50°C for 30 min blocks subsequent chlorophyll accumulation and is eventually lethal. Arabidopsis seedlings can be protected against the effects of a 50°C, 30-min challenge by a 4-h pre-incubation at 38°C. By the use of the milder challenge, 44°C for 30 min, and protective pretreatment, mutants lacking components of the acquired thermotolerance system were isolated. Putative mutants isolated by this procedure exhibited chlorophyll accumulation levels (our measure of acquired thermotolerance) ranging from 10% to 98% of control seedling levels following pre-incubation at 38°C and challenge at 50°C. The induction temperatures for maximum acquired thermotolerance prior to a high temperature challenge were the same in AtTS02 and RLD seedlings, although the absolute level of chlorophyll accumulation was reduced in the mutant. Genetic analysis showed that the loss of acquired thermotolerance in AtTS02 was a recessive trait. The pattern of proteins synthesized at 25°C and 38°C in the RLD and AtTS02 revealed the reduction in the level of a 27-kD heat shock protein in AtTS02. Genetic analysis showed that the reduction of this protein level was correlated with the acquired thermotolerance phenotype.
Plants experience high air and soil
temperatures during periods of drought and when fields receive limited
irrigation. Elevated plant temperatures that occur under these
conditions negatively impact plant health and productivity as
exemplified by changes in metabolism such as the selective
destabilization of secretory protein mRNAs in barley aleurone (Brodl
and Ho, 1991 To obtain useful mutants it is necessary to develop a rapid and
straight forward screen for alterations in the level of acquired thermotolerance. Plant regrowth, electrolyte leakage, and
2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride reduction are commonly
used procedures for evaluating thermotolerance (Wu and Wallner, 1983 We believe that the isolation and characterization of higher plant
mutants is needed to advance our understanding of the role of
individual HSPs in providing acquired thermotolerance. In this report
we detail the temperature characteristics of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings, the isolation of thermotolerance mutants using the bioassay described by Burke (1994)
Optimal Conditions to Assay Acquired Thermotolerance in Arabidopsis Seedlings To develop a thermotolerance screening procedure using the
inhibition of chlorophyll accumulation as described by Burke (1994) Determination of the Temperature for Maximum Chlorophyll Accumulation The temperature that allowed maximum chlorophyll accumulation was determined by exposing etiolated Arabidopsis (Columbia) seedlings to a series of temperatures during a 24-h exposure to continuous light (Fig. 1A). The peak of chlorophyll accumulation occurred at 25°C and similar patterns of chlorophyll accumulation were observed for RLD and C24 ecotypes (data not shown).
Challenge and Pre-Incubation Temperature Determination The temperature-induced inhibition of subsequent chlorophyll accumulation at 25°C in Arabidopsis (C24) seedlings was determined by exposing etiolated seedlings to challenge temperatures between 44°C and 56°C in the dark for 30 min prior to the 25°C, 24-h light treatment. Chlorophyll accumulation was prevented by a 30-min challenge at 48°C, or above (Fig. 1B). Light exposures of 24, 48, and 72 h following the temperature challenge revealed significant chlorophyll accumulation at challenge temperatures below 48°C indicating that these temperatures are sublethal, and no accumulation at 48°C or above (lethal temperature challenges). Depending on the severity of the challenge that was desired, temperatures of 48°C or 50°C for 30 min were used in subsequent experiments to inhibit chlorophyll accumulation. The temperature at which thermotolerance is acquired in Arabidopsis was evaluated by incubating Arabidopsis (C24) seedlings at set temperatures in the dark for 4 h prior to the 30-min, 48°C challenge (Fig. 1C). The maximum levels of chlorophyll accumulation were observed in seedlings pre-incubated at 36°C and 38°C, with the 38°C pre-incubation providing the highest level of chlorophyll accumulation and thus thermal protection. Maximal thermal protection was also obtained with a 38°C, 4-h pre-incubation for RLD and Columbia ecotypes (data not shown).Duration and Magnitude of Acquired Thermotolerance The stability of chlorophyll accumulation (namely acquired thermotolerance) in the 4-h, 38°C pre-incubated Arabidopsis seedlings was determined by delaying the 30-min 48°C challenge for increasing lengths of time. Chlorophyll accumulation levels remained constant, at about 60% to 70% of control chlorophyll accumulation, throughout a 20-h evaluation period suggesting a stable acquired thermotolerance level (Fig. 1D). These results differ from those reported for soybean cotyledons where the pattern of chlorophyll accumulation declined by approximately 50% over the 20-h period following the initial pre-incubation (Burke, 1998 ).
To determine how much protection was afforded by the 38°C
pre-incubation, the pattern of chlorophyll accumulation following a
30-min challenge at a range of elevated temperatures was evaluated in
RLD and Columbia ecotypes with and without the 4-h, 38°C
pre-incubation. Chlorophyll levels were maximum at the minimum
challenge temperature of 42°C for both RLD (Fig. 1Ea) and the
Columbia (Fig. 1Eb) ecotypes when challenged without the 38°C
pre-incubation. Chlorophyll accumulation was significantly inhibited by
increased challenge temperatures, reaching minimum accumulation levels
following challenges at 48°C to 50°C. Pre-incubation for 4 h
at 38°C (white circles) provided increased protection in both
ecotypes to approximately the same level. RLD seedlings accumulated
chlorophyll levels to approximately 75% of control levels with
challenges of 42°C, 44°C, and 46°C. Chlorophyll accumulation
declined with increasing challenge temperatures between 48°C and
54°C. Columbia seedlings accumulated chlorophyll to approximately
80% of control levels with challenges of 42°C, 44°C, and 46°C.
Chlorophyll accumulation declined to minimal levels with the 54°C
challenge in a pattern similar to the RLD seedlings. The magnitude of
acquired thermotolerance in 38°C pre-incubated seedlings of both
ecotypes provided chlorophyll accumulation at temperatures 2°C to
6°C higher than seedlings that had not received the 38°C
pre-incubation.
Additional studies evaluated the effectiveness of the 4-h, 38°C
pre-incubation temperature in providing protection against a 50°C
challenge temperature over a range of challenge times. The time course
for the loss of the chlorophyll accumulation following a 50°C
challenge temperature on Arabidopsis (Columbia) seedlings with (white
circles) and without (black circles) the 38°C pre-incubation is
provided in Figure 1F. The time required to block subsequent chlorophyll accumulation in untreated control seedlings was reduced from 30 min for a 48°C (Fig. 1B) challenge to 20 min for a 50°C challenge (Fig. 1F). The 4-h, 38°C pre-incubation provided a
relatively stable protection level up to 1 h (white circles), well
beyond the 20 min shown to block chlorophyll accumulation (black
circles) in control seedlings.
Correlation between the Induction of Acquired Thermotolerance and HSP Synthesis To determine if the pattern of HSP synthesis in Arabidopsis correlated with acquired thermotolerance as measured by the chlorophyll accumulation bioassay we compared chlorophyll accumulation with the accumulation of AtHSP101 and AtHSP17.6 under the temperature regime designed to induce acquired thermotolerance as determined in our previous experiments (Fig. 2). The two individual HSPs were identified with monospecific antibodies kindly provided by Dr. Elizabeth Vierling from the University of Arizona. Chlorophyll, measured after 24 h of light exposure at 25°C, accumulated in seedlings pre-incubated at 38°C for 60 min or longer prior to the 48°C 30-min challenge. The highest levels of chlorophyll were seen in cotyledons that received 120, 180, and 240 min of 38°C pre-incubation. Accumulation of AtHSP101 was low at 0 and 15 min of pre-incubation, increasing after 30 min to high levels. AtHSP17.6 was not apparent until after 60 min of pre-incubation at 38°C and continued to increase to 240 min. The data clearly demonstrate a close correlation between acquired thermotolerance, as measured using the chlorophyll accumulation bioassay, and HSP synthesis in Arabidopsis.
Screening for Acquired Thermotolerance Mutants Using the time and temperature parameters established for the chlorophyll accumulation bioassay of wild-type RLD, we screened M2 RLD Arabidopsis seeds from plants derived from ethyl methane sulfonate treated seeds to isolate mutants lacking all or some of the components of the acquired thermotolerance system. To recover putative mutants, a 44°C, 30-min challenge was used in place of the 48°C, 30-min treatment. This reduced challenge temperature still allowed visible detection of thermotolerance mutants due to reduced chlorophyll accumulation (Fig. 1E), but also allowed the chlorophyll levels to recover following 72 h of continuous light (Fig. 1B) aiding the recovery of the mutant for seed production (Fig. 3, A and B). Figure 3, C to H, shows the accumulation of chlorophyll in the cotyledons of RLD mutants selected as putative acquired thermotolerance mutants. Two seedlings are shown in each frame, one identified as a putative mutant, and the second showing the protection of chlorophyll accumulation by the 4-h, 38°C pre-incubation. Figure 3, C to E, shows seedlings after 24, 48, and 72 h of continuous light following a 4-h, 38°C pre-incubation and 30-min, 44°C challenge. The seedling on the right shows normal chlorophyll levels, exhibited by the green cotyledons after 24 h of continuous light. The seedling on the left was light green after 24 h and accumulated chlorophyll to control levels within 72 h. Those mutants that did not have altered components of the acquired thermotolerance pathway but had an altered pigment system were white, yellow, or light green even when exposed to continuous light for 72 h (Fig. 3, F-H) in contrast to a protected seedling exhibiting high chlorophyll levels within 24 h of light exposure shown in the lower right portion of frames Figure 3, F to H.
Putative acquired thermotolerance mutants, those that were yellow or light green after 24 h of light and subsequently accumulated high chlorophyll levels (Fig. 3, C-E), were recovered. Using this screening procedure we isolated 36 putative acquired thermotolerance mutants, 11 of which subsequently died following transplanting to soil. The surviving mutants were allowed to self-fertilize and their seeds were further evaluated for the acquired thermotolerance mutant phenotype. Figure 4A presents a bar graph representation of the results of our initial screen of the seeds produced by our selected lines. Those lines having the greatest expression of the mutant phenotype under the initial screen were advanced for further characterization. On average, based upon our analysis of over 5 g of EMS mutagenized Arabidopsis seeds, we obtained one putative acquired thermotolerance deficient mutant for every 5,000 to 6,000 seeds analyzed.
Characterization of the Acquired Thermotolerance Deficient Mutant: AtTS02 Determination of the Temperature for Maximum Chlorophyll Accumulation To validate that our screen did indeed identify mutants in acquired thermotolerance we undertook a more detailed evaluation of the temperature characteristics of one of the first lines identified, AtTS02. A comparison of the temperature response curve for chlorophyll accumulation in AtTS02 and RLD is shown in Figure 4B. Chlorophyll levels in the RLD seedlings increased with temperature from 10°C to 25°C and then declined to minimal levels at 40°C. Chlorophyll levels accumulated to maximum levels at 20°C in AtTS02 and declined with increasing temperatures. The maximum chlorophyll level in AtTS02 was approximately 90% of the level seen for RLD at 20°C. AtTS02 only accumulated chlorophyll to 64% of the RLD level at 25°C and the differential in chlorophyll levels between RLD and AtTS02 increased with increasing temperature. The chlorophyll accumulation data presented in Figure 4B provides a static picture of the endpoint for chlorophyll accumulation. The question raised was whether the low chlorophyll level in AtTS02 at 25°C (compared to RLD) was the result of a difference in the rate of chlorophyll accumulation or was due to a similar rate of accumulation between the two lines with the AtTS02 chlorophyll level peaking before the RLD. To address this question, a study evaluating the time course of chlorophyll accumulation in AtTS02 and RLD was performed at 20°C and 28°C. The rate of chlorophyll accumulation in AtTS02 at 20°C (Fig. 4Ca, white circles) was similar to that of RLD (black circles). The RLD seedlings accumulated more chlorophyll than the AtTS02 during the first 4 h, but exhibited similar rates of chlorophyll accumulation thereafter. The rate of chlorophyll accumulation in RLD seedlings at 28°C (Fig. 4Cb) was approximately twice that of the AtTS02 seedlings across all time points. Comparison of chlorophyll accumulation rates between 20°C and 28°C revealed a slight reduction in accumulation within RLD seedlings at the warmer temperature. The comparison of AtTS02 seedlings across the same two temperatures showed a 2-fold reduction in chlorophyll accumulation at the warmer temperature. Having identified the reduced rate of chlorophyll accumulation at 28°C in AtTS02, subsequent light treatments were at or near 20°C to minimize the treatment differences in chlorophyll accumulation.Pre-Incubation Temperature Determination A comparison of the effectiveness of pre-incubation temperatures in protecting the RLD and AtTS02 seedlings from a subsequent 50°C challenge is shown in Figure 4D. The RLD seedlings showed increased chlorophyll accumulation (our measure of thermotolerance) during the 20°C light treatment when pre-incubated at 40°C prior to the 50°C challenge. A pre-incubation temperature of 38°C also showed significant chlorophyll accumulation with values reaching 80% of that observed for the 40°C pre-incubated seedlings. The level of chlorophyll accumulation was negligible in seedlings that had been pre-incubated at 34°C, 36°C, 42°C, 44°C, or 46°C, thereby suggesting insufficient induction of thermotolerance outside the 38°C to 40°C range to protect against the more severe challenge imposed by a 50°C, 30-min treatment. AtTS02 seedlings (white circles) also showed maximum chlorophyll accumulation when pre-incubated at 40°C, although the absolute level of chlorophyll accumulation was only 29% of that obtained in the RLD seedlings.Genetic Analysis Since chlorophyll accumulation was preserved in RLD seedlings incubated for 4 h at 38°C before they were challenged for 30 min at 48°C to 50°C and the mutant AtTS02 was more sensitive to the 48°C to 50°C challenge temperatures than RLD despite the pre-incubation for 4 h at 38°C, we decided to investigate the genetic basis for the observed temperature sensitivity. An M7 population of the AtTS02 line was evaluated for the characteristic phenotype of the mutant. Seedlings were pre-incubated at 38°C for 4 h and challenged at 46°C for 30 min. The parent RLD seedlings accumulated high chlorophyll levels (Fig. 3I), whereas the AtTS02 showed the characteristic inhibition of chlorophyll accumulation observed in the original selection (Fig. 3J). Because of the use of the non-lethal 46°C challenge temperature, the AtTS02 mutant was able to recover from this high temperature inhibition (Fig. 3L) and continued to grow and develop like the RLD seedlings (Fig. 3K). The inheritance of the mutant phenotype observed in AtTS02 was evaluated by performing crosses between an M8 population of AtTS02 and wild-type RLD plants. The F1 progeny were evaluated for the acquired thermotolerance phenotype. The chlorophyll levels observed in F1 progeny were the same as the wild-type RLD seedlings. F1 seedlings were allowed to self-fertilize and F2 seedlings were evaluated for the mutant phenotype. When AtTS02 was used as the maternal parent, the phenotype segregated with 108 individuals having the RLD phenotype and 42 individuals having the AtTS02 phenotype. When RLD was the maternal parent, 79 individuals showed the RLD phenotype and 26 individuals showed the AtTS02 phenotype. The segregation pattern of the mutant phenotype suggested a single, recessive, nuclear-encoded Mendelian trait.Two-Dimensional Gel Protein Analysis Once it had been established that the AtTS02 line was deficient in the ability to acquire thermotolerance compared to the wild-type RLD Arabidopsis, we were interested in determining if this phenotype could be linked to a concomitant change in the synthesis of HSPs. To accomplish this, RLD seedlings and AtTS02 seedlings were treated in the dark at 22°C and 38°C for 4 h in the presence of 35S-labeled amino acid mix. Labeled proteins were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and detected by fluorography. Protein patterns for RLD and AtTS02 treated at 22°C were qualitatively identical and only minor comparative quantitative differences could be determined (data not shown). The protein patterns from each line are also essentially identical following a 4-h, 38°C pre-incubation (heat shock) treatment, with one notable exception. A low-Mr putative HSP is consistently absent in the heat-shocked AtTS02 line, as evidenced by the absence of this protein in the AtTS02, 38°C fluorograph presented in Figure 5A (left panel) compared with RLD 38°C (Fig. 5B). This protein has an apparent molecular mass of 27 kD, and a pI value of approximately 5. This protein is considered a HSP as it is synthesized during the heat shock treatment, and is not detectable in the control treated at 22°C. The loss of the 27-kD protein is the only consistent and reproducible change in the pattern of proteins synthesized by AtTS02 in response to heat shock when compared to control patterns. To further study the relationship between the absence of the 27-kD protein and the mutant phenotype, homozygous dominant, heterozygous, and homozygous recessive individuals were identified from backcrossed material. Protein analysis of these individuals demonstrated that the absence of the 27-kD HSP was always associated only with the mutant phenotype (homozygous recessive seedlings). The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 5C (heat-shocked homozygous AtTS02) and Figure 5D (heat-shocked RLD).
Characterization of Whole Plant Acquired Thermotolerance The chlorophyll accumulation assay has proven to be useful, not only in identifying acquired thermotolerance (Burke, 1994, 1998), but
also in allowing for the identification and recovery of acquired
thermotolerance deficient mutants. Because the phenotype that this
procedure uses is based upon chlorophyll accumulation, it is possible
that the observed temperature characteristics are unique to that
pathway and may not reflect the true temperature characteristics of the
entire plant. To evaluate this possibility, we compared the temperature
sensitivity of the RLD and AtTS02 lines determined by the chlorophyll
accumulation assay with a different measure of thermotolerance. The
measure of thermotolerance that we chose for comparison was the
viability of light grown seedlings 2 d after a 4-h, 38°C
pre-incubation and 30-min challenge at 46°C, 48°C, 50°C, or
52°C. The results of the viability test are shown in Figure 3M. RLD
seedlings that had an activated acquired thermotolerance system
maintained high chlorophyll levels and seedling turgor following the
46°C, 48°C, and 50°C challenges. The 52°C challenge was
sufficient to overwhelm the protection system and result in RLD
seedling death. AtTS02, on the other hand, maintained high
chlorophyll levels and seedling viability following the 46°C
treatment, but showed a loss of chlorophyll and viability at challenge
temperatures of 48°C and above. Some seedling death was apparent at
48°C, with an increasing number of seedlings dying at 50°C, and all
of the seedlings dying at 52°C. The 2°C to 4°C difference in
protection between RLD and AtTS02 observed in the chlorophyll
accumulation assay, clearly translates to a similar difference in
survival of the whole plant.
In this study we have developed and utilized a protocol for the characterization of the thermal sensitivity of Arabidopsis seedlings to isolate and characterize mutants that are deficient in the process that underlies the trait of acquired thermotolerance. We have also demonstrated a link between the synthesis of HSPs and acquired thermotolerance in one mutant line AtTS02. The protocol we describe is based on the ability of etiolated
tissues to synthesize and accumulate chlorophyll in the light at
optimal temperatures following exposure to an elevated temperature. This bioassay was first developed to investigate the temperature sensitivity and heat shock response in cucumbers (Burke, 1994 To utilize this bioassay for the isolation of Arabidopsis mutants
deficient in (or more proficient in) acquiring thermotolerance it was
necessary to identify optimum temperature and time parameters for the
wild type that yield maximum chlorophyll accumulation, injury, and
acquisition of thermotolerance. The temperature optimum for chlorophyll
accumulation in etiolated 2-d-old Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to
continuous light at 115 µmol m The sensitivity of Arabidopsis to high temperature exposure was
highlighted by Binelli and Mascarenhas (1990) Throughout the literature, the appearance of HSPs is strongly
correlated to the development of acquired thermotolerance. In soybean
induction of the heat shock response is rapid with a change in protein
synthesis patterns occurring within the first 30 min following a shift
from 30°C to 41°C. The production of HSPs becomes a substantial
portion of the total protein synthesis over the next 3 to 4 h (Key
et al., 1985 Using the time and temperature parameters established for the wild type, we screened for mutants that exhibited reduced chlorophyll accumulation (deficient in acquired thermotolerance), despite a 4-h, 38°C pre-incubation. To date, more than 60% of the putative mutants identified during the initial screen maintain a reduced acquired thermotolerance level compared with control seedlings (Fig. 4A). The relative protection levels as measured by the level of chlorophyll accumulation following a pre-incubation and challenge temperature range from 10% (TS47) to 50% of control levels (TS14, TS15, TS25, TS29, TS45, TS46, TS50, TS101, and TS102). It is important to remember that these are values obtained from seeds following self-fertilization of the identified F2 seedling, and therefore represent a possible composite of a series of distinct mutations within an isolate. Therefore backcrosses against the wild-type parents are essential. We have characterized one of the first mutants identified (AtTS02), and demonstrate that the phenotype segregates in a manner representative of a single recessive trait. The temperature sensitivity of chlorophyll accumulation in AtTS02
compared with the RLD parent ecotype (Fig. 4B) showed that similar
levels of chlorophyll were detected at 20°C and below, whereas the
mutant exhibited reduced chlorophyll accumulation above 20°C compared
to the RLD. Differential temperature sensitivity of chlorophyll
accumulation in Arabidopsis mutants is not unique to this study.
Markwell and Osterman (1992) The AtTS02 mutant does not have a fully functional high temperature protection system, thereby making it more susceptible to injury at elevated temperatures. However, pre-incubation at 38°C is not lethal to the mutant since it survives a subsequent challenge at 46°C (Fig. 3, C-E, J, and L). In fact we show that pre-incubation at 38°C and 40°C actually induced acquired thermotolerance in AtTS02, albeit to a lesser extent than the wild type (Fig. 4D). Additional analysis of other acquired thermotolerance deficient mutants is required to determine if the enhanced temperature sensitivity of chlorophyll accumulation at 25°C is a common feature of this class of mutants. Protein analysis of the AtTS02 mutant revealed a consistent reduction
in the level of a 27-kD protein following heat shock (Fig. 5) that
tracked the phenotype throughout the backcross analysis. Wu et al.
(1988) Finally, to validate our screening procedure, we analyzed the whole plant response of AtTS02 to elevated temperatures (Fig. 3M). This clearly showed it had a reduced protection, thus substantiating the usefulness of the chlorophyll accumulation bioassay for identifying acquired thermotolerance mutants. In summary, we have described the characteristics of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis, described a bioassay for identifying acquired thermotolerance deficient mutants, and characterized one of the selected mutants to show that the deficiencies can be linked to a reduction in a particular HSP and that the observed reduction in chlorophyll accumulation correlate with deficiencies observed at the whole plant level.
Plant Growth Conditions Arabidopsis ecotypes C24, Columbia, and RLD seedlings were sown on 1% (w/v) agarose in 35-mm-diameter × 10-mm-deep Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were sealed with Parafilm2 (American National Can, Greenwich, CT) and placed in a refrigerator at 4°C for 6 to 7 d. Following cold incubation, the Petri dishes were unsealed and placed in the dark at 23°C to 25°C for 48 h prior to use. Determination of the Temperature for Maximum Chlorophyll Accumulation Chlorophyll accumulation was evaluated across a range of
temperatures from 10°C to 40°C. Temperatures were obtained by
placing the Petri dishes containing the Arabidopsis seedlings on
moistened filter paper (3MM, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) on the temperature blocks of an electronically controlled eight position thermal plate system named the CELTEC (Burke and Mahan, 1993 Challenge Temperature Determination Etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings were incubated in the dark for
30 min at 25°C (control), 42°C, 44°C, 46°C, 48°C, 50°C,
52°C, or 54°C. Temperatures were obtained by placing the Petri
dishes on moistened 3MM filter paper on the temperature blocks of the CELTEC. The temperature was returned to 25°C following the high temperature challenge and the seedlings exposed to continuous light at
115 µmol m Pre-Incubation Temperature Determination Etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings were placed on moistened 3MM filter paper on the temperature blocks of the CELTEC and pre-incubated for 4 h at 28°C, 34°C, 36°C, 38°C, 40°C, 42°C, or 44°C in the dark. Following the pre-incubation period, the temperature blocks were set to 48°C, taking approximately 30 s to come to temperature, and the seedlings were incubated at this challenge temperature in the dark for 30 min. The temperature blocks were then adjusted to 25°C, again coming to temperature within 30 s, and the seedlings incubated for 16 h under continuous light. The optimal pre-incubation temperature was identified as the temperature providing the maximum chlorophyll accumulation. Duration of Acquired Thermotolerance Etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings were pre-incubated for 4 h at 38°C to induce acquired thermotolerance. The seedlings were challenged at 48°C at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 and 1,200 min in the dark and then transferred to continuous light at 25°C for 24 h. Chlorophyll accumulation was compared with 25°C control seedlings that had not been pre-incubated or challenged. Time Course for the Induction of Acquired Thermotolerance Etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings were pre-incubated at 38°C for 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min in the dark prior to exposure to a temperature challenge of 48°C for 30 min. Seedlings were placed in continuous light at 25°C and chlorophyll content was determined after 24 and 48 h. Screening for Thermotolerance Mutants M2 RLD Arabidopsis seeds from plants derived from ethyl methane sulfonate treated seeds were purchased from Lehle Seeds (Round Rock, TX) and treated as described in "Plant Growth Conditions." The mutant screening procedure involved pre-incubating the seedlings at
38°C for 4 h in the dark and challenging the seedlings at 44°C
for 30 min. The seedlings were then transferred to continuous light at
25°C at 115 µmol m In Vivo Labeling and Protein Isolation Leaf proteins were labeled in vivo by immersing the cut surface
of the stems of derooted seedlings for 4 h in water containing 0.5 mCi/mL 35S-trans label (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) at control
(22°C) or at a temperature providing a high level of acquired
thermotolerance (38°C). This labeling procedure enabled the
incorporation of label into proteins at a rate independent of uptake
rates (data not presented). Following the labeling period, seedlings
were washed in distilled water to remove excess radioactivity, and
homogenized in Tris/Gly extraction buffer (12.2 g/L Tris base, pH 8.4, and 7.6 g/L Gly) using a plastic pestle sized to fit a 1.5-mL microfuge tube mortar. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at
14,000g for 10 min. Proteins were extracted from the
supernatant by an equal volume of water saturated phenol. The phenol
phase was re-extracted with 0.5 volume of extraction buffer and
proteins were precipitated overnight at Protein Isolation and Western Analysis Protein was isolated from shoot tissue by pulverizing the tissue
in extraction buffer (0.5 M Tris-Cl, pH 8.65, 50 mM EDTA, 0.1 M KCl, and 2% [v/v]
Membranes were blocked for 1 h in TBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (TTBS) and 5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk. Primary antibody (1:5,000 for both HSP 101 and HSP 17.6) was incubated with the membrane in TTBS for 1 h at room temperature. Following three 5-min washes in TTBS, goat anti rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce) was incubated with the membrane at a dilution of 1:10,000 in TTBS for 1 h. Following three 5-min washes in TTBS, signal detection was achieved using the SuperSignal Substrate system (Pierce). Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis Two-dimensional separation of radiolabeled proteins was achieved
using the Immobiline DryStrip Kit and ExcelGel SDS on the Multiphor II electrophoresis system (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Procedures followed the manufacturer's instructions with some
modifications. Acetic acid was used instead of Pharmalyte 3-10 in the
rehydration solution for IEF dry strips to improve the quality of the
second dimension and to remove contaminating ampholytes. Approximately
200,000 cpm of each sample were loaded on each first-dimension
Immobiline strip. The SDS-PAGE gel, following the final protein
separation step, was treated with fixer (10% [v/v] acetic
acid and 30% [v/v] methanol) for 30 min and fluor (55%
[v/v] acetic acid, 15% [v/v] ethanol, 30%
[v/v] xylene, and 0.8% [w/v] 2, 5-diphenyl oxazole)
for 1 h. The gel was washed twice in distilled water for 2 min,
covered with wet cellulose acetate sheet and dried for 2 h at
45°C. Labeled proteins were detected by fluorography by exposure to
x-ray film (BIOMAX-MR, Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY) in the
presence of a single enhancer screen at Characterization of Whole Plant Acquired Thermotolerance Arabidopsis ecotype RLD and AtTS02 mutant seedlings were surface sterilized and sown on 1% (w/v) agarose containing MS minimal media (4.5 g/L) as described in "Plant Growth Conditions." The germinating seedlings were moved to a growth chamber (model E-30B, Percival, Boone, IA) at 25°C with continuous light for 5 d. After the 5-d light treatment the Petri dishes containing the seedlings were placed on moistened 3MM filter paper on the temperature blocks of the CELTEC and covered with plastic wrap to prevent the filter paper from drying. The plates containing seedlings were to the temperature blocks of the CELTEC as described in "Determination of the Temperature for Maximum Chlorophyll Accumulation" and exposed to a 38°C pre-incubation temperature for 4 h, followed by a 30-min challenge at 46°C, 48°C, 50°C, or 52°C. The plates were then returned to the 25°C growth chamber for 48 h under light conditions prior to analysis. Plant viability was determined visually. Genetic Analysis RLD and AtTS02 plants were crossed and F1 seeds produced. Some F1 seeds were analyzed for the level of acquired thermotolerance relative to the parental lines. Other F1 seeds were planted in arabaskets and grown as described earlier under light at a constant 25°C. These F1 plants were allowed to self-fertilize, and the resulting F2 seeds were collected and tested in segregation studies of the mutant phenotype. Eighty F2 seeds were planted in arabaskets and grown to maturity. These F2 plants were allowed to self-fertilize and the F3 seed from each individual F2 plant was characterized for the acquired thermotolerance phenotype. Individual F3 seed lots were separated based upon their homozygous dominant, homozygous recessive, or their heterozygous phenotypes. Representatives from these seed lots were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to determine if the absence of any specific protein tracked the mutant phenotype.
The authors wish to express gratitude to Norma Zuñiga, Jacob Sanchez, and Thomas Mahan for their technical assistance throughout the course of this research.
Received November 12, 1999; accepted February 22, 2000. 1 This work was supported in part by the National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program/U.S. Department of Agriculture (grant no. 96-35100-3168).
* Corresponding author; e-mail jburke{at}lbk.ars.usda.gov; fax 806-723-5272.
2 Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
), 48 h (
), and
72 h (
) following the 30-min temperature challenge. C,
Pre-incubation temperatures that induce acquired thermotolerance
of chlorophyll accumulation in cotyledons of Arabidopsis (C24)
seedlings to a previously lethal 48°C challenge. D, Duration of
acquired thermotolerance for chlorophyll accumulation in cotyledons of
Arabidopsis seedlings pre-incubated at 38°C for 4 h and
challenged at 48°C at specified time periods. E, Effectiveness of
30-min temperature challenges on reducing the level of chlorophyll
accumulation in control (
)
cotyledons of RLD (a) and Columbia (b) Arabidopsis seedlings. F, Time
course of injury to chlorophyll accumulation in control (
1 h
20°C by addition of 2.5 volumes of 0.1 M ammonium acetate in methanol. After
recovery by centrifugation the protein pellet was washed once in 0.1 M ammonium acetate in methanol, air dried, and resuspended
in IEF buffer (0.54 g/mL urea, 10 mg/mL DTT, 0.02 mL/mL 3-10 Pharmalyte, 0.005 mL/mL Triton X-100, and 0.001% [w/v]
bromphenol blue). Following resuspension in IEF buffer, insoluble
material was removed by centrifugation at 14,000g for 2 min, the supernatant moved to a new tube, and stored at 
-mercaptoethanol). Pulverized tissue was cleared of cell debris by
centrifugation in 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes in a refrigerated
benchtop microcentrifuge at 10,000g for 5 min. The clear
supernatant was removed to fresh microcentrifuge tubes and protein
concentrations were estimated by the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA) using BSA as standard. Proteins were
fractionated by 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE using the Bio-Rad minigel
system and transferred to PVDF membrane (Pierce, Rockford, IL) using
the Bio-Rad TransBlot in transfer buffer (5.8 g/L Tris base, 2.9 g/L
Gly, and 200 mL/L 100% [v/v] methanol) for 1 h at 0.2 amps.
