Department of Biological Sciences and Phytotechnology Research
Center, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive,
Houghton, Michigan 49931
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Nitrate reductase (NR; EC
1.6.6.1-3) is a central enzyme in nitrogen metabolism of plants with
key roles in nitrate conversion to ammonium and regulation of nitrate
acquisition (Campbell, 1999
). It is clear that regulation of NR
activity and plant nitrogen metabolism is tightly linked to control of
carbon metabolism via signal transduction involving phosphorylation of
NR and the binding protein called 14-3-3 (Huber et al., 1996
; Moorhead
et al., 1996
). At the same time, study of NR biochemistry has been
greatly advanced by recombinant expression of holo-NR in an
active form in the methylotrophic yeast, Pichia pastoris (Su
et al., 1997
). One of the limits to the study of NR biochemistry has
been the small quantities of NR made in plants, and P. pastoris is a heterologous eukaryotic protein expression system
with the capacity to produce high levels of target proteins (Higgins
and Cregg, 1998
). Another limit on NR biochemical studies is the
complexity of the enzyme. NR has a monomeric subunit built from
approximately 100-kD polypeptide and 1 each of Mo, molybdopterin (MPT),
heme-Fe, and FAD with the active enzyme being a homo-dimer (Campbell,
1999
). In addition, the holo-NR is well known to be
proteolytically unstable, which can be attributed at least in part
to the large size of the polypeptide chain. Fortunately,
cofactor-binding sites of NR are built with modular units that are
composed of independently folding regions of the polypeptide called
domains. Thus, proteolytic fragments of NR have been studied via the
partial enzyme activities they catalyze (Kubo et al., 1988
; Solomonson
and Barber, 1990
; Shiraishi et al., 1991
). Moreover, since the domains
of NR are laid out in a linear array in the NR gene, it has been
possible to express recombinant proteins containing the proteolytic
fragments of the enzyme (Campbell, 1996
, 1999
). Basically, recombinant
expression of fragments of NR has resulted in a simplification of the
enzyme's biochemistry and advanced our understanding more rapidly.
Traditionally, NR has been viewed as having three domains for binding
the Mo-MPT, heme-Fe, and FAD cofactors (Solomonson and Barber, 1990
).
However, the recombinant 30-kD FAD-containing cytochrome (Cyt) b
reductase (CbR) fragment of NR also has the NADH-binding site
(Campbell, 1996
). The two domains of CbR, one for binding FAD and one
for binding NADH, were most clearly revealed in the three-dimensional
(3-D) structure of this NR fragment derived by x-ray diffraction
analysis (Lu et al., 1994
, 1995
). It was also demonstrated that the
pyridine nucleotide preference of NR was controlled, at least in part,
by fine structure differences in the NADPH-binding domain of
recombinant CbR derived from Neurospora crassa NADPH:NR
(Shiraishi et al., 1998
). Moreover, we suggested that the large size of
the Mo-MPT "domain" was probably too big to be a single folding
structure and that it might be divided into parts responsible for
formation of the nitrate-reducing active site of NR and the dimer. This
idea was partly confirmed when the 3-D structure of sulfite oxidase
(SOX; EC 1.8.3.1) was determined and found to have three domains: one
for its Cyt b, one for binding Mo-MPT, and one for dimer formation
(Kisker et al., 1997
). Since SOX is also a homo-dimer with about 50%
amino acid sequence identity with NR in their shared functional
domains, a 3-D model for the N-terminal region of NR was made by
atom-replacement, which showed that this part of NR could be folded
into two domains: one for binding Mo-MPT and forming the
nitrate-reducing active site, and one for the dimer interface
(Campbell, 1999
). When the model for the N-terminal part of NR derived
from the 3-D structure of SOX was combined with the 3-D model for the
Cyt c reductase fragment of NR, which was described earlier (Lu et al.,
1995
), a 3-D model for dimeric holo-NR was produced (Campbell, 1999
).
This 3-D model for NR reveals the basic five-domain structure of the
enzyme with one independently folded region for: (a)
Mo-MPT-binding and nitrate-reducing active site; (b) dimer interface;
(c) Cyt b; (d) FAD binding; and (e) NADH/NADPH binding. There are three
other sequence regions of NR that may not have fixed folds in their
structure and are not revealed by the 3-D model of holo-NR: (a)
N-terminal sequence extension with a variable length from about 30 to
110 amino acids in different NR forms and a possible function in NR
activity regulation; (b) hinge 1 between the dimer interface and Cyt b
domains, which contains the regulatory Ser residue that is
phosphorylated and then binds to 14-3-3 when NR is inhibited by this
protein in the presence of divalent cations like
Mg2+; and (c) hinge 2 between the Cyt b and
FAD-binding domains, which varies in length from 15 to 30 amino acids
and probably functions in stabilizing the binding of these two domains.
To investigate if the dimer interface domain of NR is an
independently folding region of the enzyme and really involved in dimer
formation, it was recombinantly expressed in the present study,
separated from the Mo-MPT domain while attached to the C-terminal
fragment of NR via hinge 1. We now suggest that the C-terminal fragment
of NR, which was formerly know as the Cyt c reductase fragment, be
called the Mo reductase (MoR) fragment of the enzyme since this is the
function it serves in holo-NR. We have called the fragment of NR with
the interface domain and hinge 1 attached to N terminus of MoR, "MoR
plus interface domain/hinge1," or simply MoR plus (MoR+). Both MoR
and MoR+ are defined structurally and functionally in Figure
1. The MoR and MoR+ fragments of NR catalyze two irreversible reactions, which are well known partial reactions of holo-NR:
NADH + 2 Cyt
cox
NAD+ + H+ + 2 Cyt cred
Eo' = 0.54 V;
Go =
104 kJ/mol
(Reaction 1)
NADH + 2 FeCNox
NAD+ + H+ + 2 FeCNred
Eo' = 0.68 V;
Go =
131 kJ/mol
(Reaction 2)

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Graphic model for the MoR and MoR+ fragments of
NR. The structural components of MoR and MoR+ are shown: MoR consists
of the CbR fragment of NR attached to the Cyt b domain by hinge 2, whereas MoR+ has the predicted NR dimer interface domain linked via
hinge 1 to MoR. All MoR fragments have NADH-dependent FeCN and Cyt c
reductase activities with the internal redox center involved in
electron acceptor reduction shown.
|
|
Reaction 1 is the unique Cyt c reductase activity of MoR
and MoR+, whereas reaction 2, ferricyanide (FeCN) reductase activity, is also a property of the CbR fragment of NR (Campbell, 1992
; Dwivedi
et al., 1994
). These partial reactions are similar to events in NR
catalysis and characterizing these reactions in fragments of NR is
helpful for overall understanding of NR. In the results presented here,
we also take advantage of the recombinant expression of MoR and MoR+
fragments of NR to explore some aspects of the P. pastoris
protein expression system.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Characteristics of P. pastoris Transformants
Selected for High Level Expression of MoR
The regions of the spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and corn
(Zea mays) NADH:NR proteins expressed as SoMoR, ZmMoR, and
ZmMor+ are defined in Table I along with their predicted
molecular sizes and a short description of their domain compositions
(see Fig. 1). The SoMoR construct has
three AUG start codons in 5' end of the predicted transcript and the
second is used to make SoMoR, as shown by amino acid sequencing of the
purified protein (Ratnam et al., 1997
). The SoMoR P. pastoris clone has the MutS (methanol
utilization) phenotype, whereas the ZmMoR and ZmMoR+/pPICZ P. pastoris clones have the Mut+ phenotype.
These results fit well with the most commonly expected mode of genome
integration for these P. pastoris vectors (Higgins and
Cregg, 1998
). The other difference between the spinach and corn MoR
expressing cell lines is due to the his4 gene, which is
restored to P. pastoris GS115 by the pHIL-D2 vector in the SoMoR clone and not restored by pPICZ or pGAPZ vectors. Therefore, the
culture medium was supplemented with His for growth of P. pastoris cell lines producing ZmMoR and ZmMoR+.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I.
Definition of recombinant MoR fragments of NR
The MoR fragment of NR was formerly called the Cyt c reductase
fragment. Refer to Figure 1 for definition of the functionality of MoR
and MoR+, as well as their structural schematic.
|
|
The P. pastoris cell lines selected for SoMoR, ZmMoR,
ZmMoR+/PICZ, and ZmMoR+/GAPZ have specific activities for FeCN
reductase of 34, 4, 2, and 2 µmol NADH oxidized
min
1 mg
1 protein,
respectively, in centrifuged crude extracts of cells grown in shake
flasks under optimum conditions. The number of copies of these
constructs for the MoR clones integrated in the P. pastoris
genome of the selected cell lines has not yet been determined, however,
the high levels of expression obtained suggest that multiple copies
were present, especially for the SoMoR P. pastoris clone. It
has been shown that for many proteins expressed in P. pastoris that the level of production of the target protein is
related to the number of copies of recombinant gene present in the
P. pastoris genome (Higgins and Cregg, 1998
). Since only very few of the clones analyzed during screening had the high levels of
FeCN reductase activity in the selected cell lines, we suspect that the
expression level in P. pastoris for the MoR fragments of NR
is related to copy number, but this remains to be shown.
Expression of MoR in the Fermenter
For SoMoR, expression was optimized in shake flasks and high
levels of expression of Cyt c reductase activity were obtained after
48 h of culture on methanol (data not shown). Subsequently, a
fermenter was used for a single growth run of SoMoR-expressing P. pastoris cells (Fig. 2A). Production
of FeCN reductase activity was not significant until SoMoR expression
was induced by the methanol feed, after which enzyme activity showed a
near steady increase for the next 40 h. In accordance with the
MutS phenotype of the SoMoR/pHIL-D2 P. pastoris clone, the methanol feed rate was kept low at 4 mL
L
1 h
1 and the wet cell
mass in the fermenter increased by approximately 2-fold from 0.8 to 1.5 kg for the 5-L culture during growth on methanol. In this fermenter
run, total FeCN reductase activity in the cell extract increased by
approximately 90-fold and during the last 24 h, the average
specific activity was 33 ± 8 µmol NADH oxidized
min
1 mg
1 protein
with SD for seven samples. The total yield for
this 5-L fermenter run was approximately 2,100 mg of SoMoR, based on
Vmax for SoMoR FeCN reductase activity in
Table II.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
FeCN reductase activity of SoMoR, ZmMoR, and
ZmMoR+ expressed in fermenter cultures. Operation of the fermenter,
enzyme activity assays, and sampling was done as described in
"Materials and Methods." One unit of FeCN reductase activity is
defined as 1 µmol NADH oxidized min 1. A,
Fermentation of P. pastoris cells expressing SoMoR from the
pHIL-D2 vector with MutS phenotype. B,
Fermentation of P. pastoris cells expressing ZmMoR from the
pPICZ vector with Mut+ phenotype. C, Fermentation
of P. pastoris cells expressing ZmMoR+ from the pGAPZ vector
with constitutive expression. The arrows indicate time points at which
the carbon source for growth was applied as a pumped feed to the
fermenter:methanol (MeOH) feed, mixed (glycerol and MeOH) feed, and Glc
feed.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II.
Steady-state kinetic constants for MoR fragments
Kinetics were analyzed on the HP 8453 spectrophotometer as described in
"Materials and Methods" at 25°C, in 30 mM MOPS, pH
7.0. NADH, FeCN, and Cyt c were varied from 5 to 90 µM, 5 to 200 µM, and 5 to 50 µM, respectively.
True Km and Vmax were
determined from replots of the apparent kinetic constants at each
concentration of the "fixed" or second substrate (Campbell and
Smarrelli, 1978 ), after the apparent kinetic constants were determined
with the EnzPack program (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO) using the
observed initial velocities at each substrate concentration for every
concentration of the second substrate.
|
|
The clone expressing ZmMoR from the AOX1 promoter with the
Mut+ phenotype has a different growth pattern in
the fermenter (Fig. 2B). ZmMoR expression begins during growth of
P. pastoris on glycerol and markedly accelerated during the
mixed and methanol feeds. The uneven pattern for FeCN reductase
activity expression is due to the difficulty in maintaining the optimum
methanol feed rate when using the "oxygen spike" method for feed
rate adjustment, as described in "Materials and Methods." Methanol
feed rates as high as 10 to 14 mL L
1
h
1 were used for this
Mut+ phenotype P. pastoris cell line
and a His supplement was provided. The wet cell mass in the fermenter
increased by 3-fold from 0.8 to 2.4 kg for the 6-L culture during
growth on methanol, whereas the total FeCN reductase activity in the
cell extract increased by approximately 17-fold. During the entire
fermenter run, the average FeCN reductase specific activity was
2.7 ± 0.6 µmol NADH oxidized min
1
mg
1 protein with SD for
13 samples. The total yield for this 6-L fermenter run was
approximately 190 mg of ZmMoR calculated from the
Vmax for FeCN reductase activity of ZmMoR
in Table II.
The production pattern for ZmMoR+ when expressed from the constitutive
GAP promoter shows a steady increase of FeCN reductase activity from
the start of the fermenter run (Fig. 2C). Wet cell mass for the 6-L
fermenter run increased approximately 30-fold from 0.06 to 1.65 kg
during the 35.5-h growth, which was about one-half the time required to
produce this cell mass with the MutS cell line
and equal to the mass produced by the Mut+ cell
lines in 36 h. The total FeCN reductase activity increased approximately 40-fold with an average specific activity of 3.1 ± 1.6 µmol NADH oxidized min
1
mg
1 protein with SD for seven
samples. The total yield for this 6-L fermenter run was approximately
100 mg of ZmMoR+ calculated from Vmax for
FeCN reductase activity in Table II.
Comparison of the total soluble protein produced per gram of P. pastoris cell showed SoMoR, ZmMoR, and ZmMoR+ P. pastoris cell lines had average levels of 53 ± 8, 39 ± 13, and 38 ± 6 mg g
1, with
SD for six to 10 samples. Since SoMoR is produced
at approximately 10 times the level of ZmMoR per liter of culture (Fig.
2, A and B), it is difficult to compare MoR production between the
MutS and Mut+ phenotype
cell lines. However, it is clear that greater P. pastoris cell mass is produced when full methanol utilization capacity is
present. The greater production of MoR in the SoMoR cell line is
probably due to the number of copies of the gene construct integrated
in the genome or some other unique feature of this line and not due to
the difference in Mut phenotype. In comparing the methanol-induced and
constitutive expression systems, it is easier to operate the fermenter
when growing the cells on a simple Glc feed for constitutive expression
of the GAP promoter target protein than for either of the
methanol-induced expression systems. If a longer time had been used for
the production of ZmMoR+ in the constitutive cell line, the amount of
target protein might have approached that obtained for ZmMoR (compare
Fig. 2, B and C). In both methanol driven expression cell lines, the
specific activity of FeCN reductase activity increased or held steady
over the entire growth, while in the constitutive system it declined as
the cells grew. However, as will be shown below, constitutive expression of complex proteins like ZmMoR+ and holo-NR, which are
proteolytically labile, may make down-stream processing easier since
the P. pastoris cells have a different complement of
proteins and perhaps less internal proteinase activity is released on
cell lysis. It is known that when P. pastoris is induced
with methanol, formation of peroxisomes takes place and this shift in
metabolism results in a different protein profile as compared to
constitutively grown cells (Higgins and Cregg, 1998
).
MoR and MoR+ Purification and Characterization
SoMoR was purified using blue Sepharose, as
previously described (Ratnam et al., 1997
). To avoid copurification of
endogenous formate dehydrogenase with SoMoR, the crude extract was
fractionated to obtain the protein precipitating between 30% and 50%
saturated ammonium sulfate prior to affinity chromatography. Purified
SoMoR had a specific activity of 1,900 µmol NADH oxidized
min
1 mg
1 protein for
FeCN reductase activity, which represents approximately 60-fold
purification relative to the crude extract with its high enzyme
content. Yields were 30% to 40% when 0.25-L batches were processed,
which provided 30 to 40 mg of purified SoMoR, determined by
A413. SoMoR was concentrated, buffer
exchanged into 25 mM MOPS (3-[N-morpholino] propanesulfonic acid), pH 7.0, and
frozen at
80°C. Purified SoMoR was homogeneous when evaluated by
SDS-PAGE and its polypeptide was approximately 42 kD as predicted in
Table I (Fig. 3, lane 4). Its N-terminal
sequence is MYSMSEVKKHQT, which established that the second AUG codon
in the construct was used for translation (Ratnam et al., 1997
). SoMoR
cross-reacted with antibodies to ZmCbR in a western blot yielding the
same size for the polypeptide as the SDS-PAGE gel (Fig. 3B, lane 4).
Its oxidized and NADH-reduced visible spectra (Fig.
4A) were virtually identical to those of
spinach and other NR, as well as other MoR fragments of NR (Kubo et
al., 1988
; Solomonson and Barber, 1990
; Campbell, 1992
, 1999
; Ratnam et
al., 1997
). The steady-state kinetic constants for the FeCN and Cyt c
reductase activities catalyzed by SoMoR showed that it has a higher
Vmax for both reactions and higher
Km for NADH and FeCN than ZmMoR (Table II).
The kinetic constants for the SoMoR FeCN reductase activity are
virtually identical to those reported for the spinach flavin domain,
where they found a kcat of 2,800 s
1, which compares closely to the SoMoR
kcat of 2,700 s
1
shown in Table II (Quinn et al., 1996
; Barber et al., 1997
). Spinach NR
was shown to be cleaved in hinge 2 by Staphylococcus aureus
strain V8 proteinase Glu-C (Kubo et al., 1988
; Shiraishi et al., 1991
).
When we treated SoMoR with proteinase Glu-C (ratio 1:1,000,
Glu-C:SoMoR), the enzyme lost all Cyt c reductase activity in 20 min
and yielded fragments of approximately 10 kD with a Cyt b spectrum and
approximately 30 kD with a flavoprotein spectrum similar to ZmCbR when
fractionated by AMP-Sepharose with fragment sizes determined by
SDS-PAGE (Shiraishi and Campbell, 1997
; data not shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
SDS-PAGE and western-blot analysis of purified
SoMoR, ZmMoR, and ZmMoR+. Electrophoresis and western blotting were
done as previously described (Campbell, 1992 ). A, SDS-PAGE: lane M,
rainbow marker protein standards (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech); lane 1, ZmMoR+ constitutively expressed from pGAPZ; lane 2, ZmMoR+ expressed by
methanol-induction from pPICZ; lane 3, ZmMoR; and lane 4, SoMoR. B,
Western blot developed with rabbit antibodies raised against ZmCbR
(Campbell, 1992 ); lane contents the same as in A with the position of
the rainbow marker standard proteins shown.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Visible spectra of oxidized and NADH-reduced
purified SoMoR, ZmMoR, and ZmMoR+. Spectra were taken of MoR fragments
in 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, at 25°C, before and after
reduction with solid NADH in air. A, SoMoR (5 µM);
B, ZmMoR (2 µM); C, ZmMoR+ (14 µM). The
digitized absorbances were converted to the mM extinction
coefficient values by normalizing with A413 = 120 mM 1
cm 1 (Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1985 ).
|
|
ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ were purified by Zm2,69 monoclonal antibody
immunoaffinity chromatography with elution at pH 11 followed by
immediate neutralization, as previously described (Hyde et al., 1989
;
Campbell, 1992
). One difference from purifications done previously with
plant and Escherichia coli extracts was found: The high
concentration of protein in P. pastoris extracts resulted in
non-specific binding of endogenous proteins, which had to be washed off
the enzyme-bound gel by 0.15 M NaCl in MOPS
buffer prior to elution to obtain high purity of the MoR fragment.
ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ had specific activities of 1,700 and 1,000 µmol NADH oxidized min
1 mg
1
protein for FeCN reductase activity, respectively, which represents approximately 600- and 300-fold purification relative to the crude extract. Yields were approximately 50% when 0.5-L batches were processed, which provided 6 to 9 and 4 to 9 mg of purified ZmMoR and
ZmMoR+, respectively, determined by
A413. ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ were concentrated,
buffer exchanged into 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, and frozen at
80°C. Purified ZmMoR was homogeneous when evaluated by
SDS-PAGE and its polypeptide was approximately 41 kD as predicted in
Table I (Fig. 3A, lane 3). ZmMoR+ purified from the Glc-grown P. pastoris cell line with constitutive expression from the GAP promoter was homogeneous when evaluated by SDS-PAGE and its polypeptide was approximately 66 kD, which is slightly smaller than the size predicted in Table I (Fig. 3A, lane 1). ZmMoR+ purified from the pPICZ
P. pastoris cell line had two polypeptides when analyzed by
SDS-PAGE, which were approximately 66 and approximately 41 kD (Fig. 3A,
lane 2). Western blotting with antibodies to ZmCbR demonstrated that
the ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ from both preparations were cross-reactive, which
shows that all the polypeptides are derived from the target proteins
and not due to contamination (Fig. 3B, lanes 1-3). Thus, it appears
that ZmMoR+ is labile at hinge 1 when the target protein is expressed
by methanol induction of the PICZ P. pastoris cell line and
a significant portion of the 66-kD polypeptide is degraded to the 41-kD
ZmMoR fragment in the final product. Since the degradation problem was
not found with ZmMoR+ from the constitutively expressing GAPZ P. pastoris cell line, we presume that an endogenous P. pastoris proteinase is expressed during methanol induction that is
not present in constitutively grown cells. This finding has
significance for the methanol-induced expression of recombinant holo-NR
in P. pastoris, where partially degraded polypeptide has
also been found (Su et al., 1997
). All further studies of ZmMoR+ were
conducted with the enzyme isolated from the constitutively expressing
P. pastoris cell line.
Part of the purpose in expressing ZmMoR+ was to show that the predicted
dimer interface domain of NR is an independently folded region of the
enzyme and determine if it is involved in formation of multimers of the
enzyme. Clearly, the interface domain when added to the N terminus of
the Cyt b domain of ZmMoR via hinge 1 is a stable addition since we
could isolate ZmMoR+ with its predicted size (Fig. 3, A and B, lane 1).
To determine if the interface domain influenced the quaternary
structure of ZmMoR, we compared native sizes of ZmMoR, ZmMoR+, and
AtNR2 using gel filtration (Fig. 5).
Using the method of Siegel and Monty (1966)
and a set of standard
proteins with known sizes, the Stokes radii are: ZmMoR = 31.9 Å,
ZmMoR+ = 50.4 Å, and AtNR2 = 64.6 Å. Redinbaugh and Campbell
(1981)
reported Stokes radii for corn NR forms from 58 to 60 Å, and
squash NADH:NR = 64 Å. For the set of NR fragments and
holo-enzyme determined here the molecular masses evaluated by
the method of Andrews (1965)
are: ZmMoR = 66 kD; ZmMoR+ = 270 kD;
and AtNR2 = 470 kD. Squash NR has a molecular mass of 410 kD by this method. Of course, we know that squash NR has a native molecular mass of 230 kD and a subunit polypeptide with a
predicted Mr = 103,376, which makes it a
dimer of two equally sized subunits (Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1985
;
Hyde et al., 1991
). These results suggest that ZmMoR is a monomer and
ZmMoR+ and AtNR2 are dimers with asymmetric dimensions such that they
run larger on gel filtration than their actual size, like the natural
forms of NR. However, since P. pastoris-expressed
recombinant AtNR2 is a mixture of dimer and tetramer forms when
analyzed by gradient PAGE (Su et al., 1997
), we also analyzed native
molecular sizes of the MoR fragments and compared them to highly
purified AtNR2 using native gradient PAGE (data not shown). In this
native gel, which was calibrated with a set of standard proteins of
known size, SoMoR and ZmMoR ran with sizes of approximately 70 kD,
which corresponds to the size found for ZmMoR by gel filtration and
suggests these NR fragments are monomeric. ZmMoR+ had a major band at
140 kD and a minor band at 280 kD, which suggests that this NR fragment is a mostly a dimer with a small amount of tetramer. AtNR2 was found to
be mostly tetrameric (approximately 500 kD) with a small amount of
dimer ( approximately 230 kD), which agrees with the previous analysis
with less purified enzyme (Su et al., 1997
). Thus, adding the putative
dimer interface to ZmMoR via hinge 1 results in the formation of a
dimer.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Determination of Stokes radii for ZmMoR, and
ZmMoR+ and AtNR2 by gel filtration. The standard proteins and their
Stokes radii (from left to right on the graph) are: ribonuclease A,
16.4 Å; chymotrypsinogen A, 20.9 Å; ovalbumin, 30.5 Å; aldolase,
48.1 Å; ferritin, 61 Å; and thyroglobulin, 85 Å. Equation of the
linear regression line is: y = 0.127x + 0.35 and the correlation coefficient is:
r2 = 0.967. The Stokes radii of ZmMoR,
ZmMoR+, and AtNR2 are 31.9, 50.4, and 64.6 Å, respectively.
|
|
The other reasons for expressing ZmMoR+ were to determine if the dimer
interface domain and the dimerization of ZmMoR influenced its
biochemical properties. We found that the visible spectra of oxidized
and NADH-reduced ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ were virtually identical (Fig. 4, B
and C) and similar to other forms of NADH:NR (Campbell, 1992
; Ratnam et
al., 1997
). We also examined the steady-state kinetic constants for
ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ and found them to be identical (Table II). Thus, the
addition of the dimer interface domain and hinge 1 to ZmMoR has no
influence on its visible spectra or its catalytic activities.
Redox Potentials of SoMoR, ZmMoR, and ZmMoR+
We also analyzed the redox potentials of the FAD and heme-Fe
centers in ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ to determine if the interface domain had an
influence on these properties (Table
III). Here we expected to see a
difference in the redox potential of the heme-Fe center since holo-NR
and the Cyt b domain of Chlorella vulgaris NR with an
N-terminal sequence similar in size to the interface domain have more
negative potentials than the free Cyt b domain or the heme-Fe in SoMoR
(Solomonson and Barber, 1990
; Cannons et al., 1993
; Ratnam et al.,
1997
). We found by spectral analysis of ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ titrated to
different redox potentials under anaerobic conditions that their redox
potentials were indeed different with ZmMoR+ having a mid-point
potential about 30 mV more negative than ZmMoR (Table III). We also
carried out protein film voltammetry on ZmMoR+, ZmMoR, SoMoR, and ZmCbR
in the presence and absence of 10 to 15 mM
NAD+. Cyclic voltammograms of the MoR and CbR
fragments revealed mid-point potentials of
280 to
250 mV, which
were shifted to more positive potential by 40 to 80 mV in the presence
of NAD+ (Table III). These results are similar to
those found by a similar method for the spinach flavin domain and have
been attributed to the two electron reduction of FAD to
FADH2, since this redox potential is about the
same as obtained for the FAD in ZmCbR and NR by chemical redox
titration and spectral analysis (Solomonson and Barber, 1990
; Ratnam et
al., 1995
; Barber et al., 1997
). The proteins were also analyzed
by square wave voltammetry, which has been described as being more
precise than cyclic voltammetry (Barber et al., 1997
), and found the
protein film square wave voltammograms for ZmMoR+, ZmMoR, SoMoR, and
SoMoR/NAD+ could be deconvoluted by mathematical
treatment to reveal three mid-point redox potentials, as described in
"Materials and Methods" (Table III). Using a similar treatment of
the square wave voltammogram of ZmCbR, it could not be resolved into
additional peaks. Multiple peaks in the cyclic voltammogram of
flavo-Cyt c3, which contains FAD and four heme-Fe
centers, have been resolved by a similar mathematical deconvolution
method (Turner et al., 1999
). The most negative square wave
voltammetric peaks (peak 1) for ZmMoR+, ZmMoR, and SoMoR had redox
potentials corresponding to the FAD/FADH2 couple
and were similar to the results for ZmCbR and the spinach flavin domain
(Table III; Barber et al., 1997
). In addition, the presence of
NAD+ shifted peak 1 to a more positive potential
by 50 to 80 mV for SoMoR and ZmCbR, which is similar to the results
previously reported for the spinach flavin domain and ZmCbR and their
site-directed mutants (Ratnam et al., 1995
; Trimboli et al.,
1996
; Barber et al., 1997
). Peak 2 in the square wave
voltammogram of SoMoR was also shifted more positive in the presence of
NAD+ by 100 mV (Table III), which suggests that
this peak is also due to a flavin species. Peak 2 with a redox
potential of
170 to
150 mV is similar to the potential previously
reported for the flavin semiquinone couple
(FAD·
/FADH2), which has
a potential of
180 to
170 mV in spinach and C. vulgaris NR (Kay et al., 1988
; Kay et al., 1989
). Peak 3 of the square wave voltammograms of ZmMoR+, ZmMoR, and SoMoR was more
positive than the flavin potentials and not influenced by the presence
of NAD+, which suggested that it was probably due
to the 1 electron reduction of the heme-Fe center (Table III). Peak 3 potentials were also similar to the potentials determined for the
heme-Fe centers of these NR fragments by spectral-chemical redox
titration (Table III; Ratnam et al., 1997
). Here the influence of the
interface domain on the redox potential of the heme-Fe center in ZmMoR
is more evident since it shifts more negative by 80 mV.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III.
Standard redox potentials for cofactors in NR
fragments at pH 7.0 and 25°C
Mid-point potentials (Eo') are shown in mV
versus the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) with the SD
for n = 8 to 25. Methods used were cyclic voltammetry
(CV), square wave voltammetry (SWV), and spectrochemical redox
titration, as described in "Materials and Methods." When used,
NAD+ was added at a concentration of 10 to 15 mM. Multiple peaks found in SWV analysis of MoR fragments
were resolved by deconvolution of the observed peak using a
semi-derivative method. Single peak values for SWV indicate that no
addition peaks were found by mathematical treatment.
|
|
Stopped-Flow Rapid-Scan Kinetics of ZmMoR
Reaction of ZmMoR with excess NADH under anaerobic conditions at
15°C in the stopped-flow rapid scanning spectrophotometer system
yielded a series of spectra demonstrating the rapid, progressive reduction of the FAD and the heme-Fe (Fig.
6A). Transient kinetics of NADH reduction
of ZmMoR were analyzed using A557 and
A460 to follow reduction of heme-Fe and
FAD, respectively (Fig. 7). These single
wavelength traces did not fit with a good correlation coefficient to a
single exponential equation for a simple first-order reaction (Fig. 7,
A and C), whereas both fit well if two exponential terms are used (Fig.
7, B and D), which suggests that both processes are biphasic. The first
step in NADH reduction of MoR, where FAD is reduced to
FADH2, takes place rapidly with a rate constant of 700 s
1 at 15°C and the second slower phase
has a rate constant of 27 s
1 (Fig. 7D). The
second step where FADH2 transfers a single
electron to the heme-Fe has rate constants of 300 and 28 s
1 at 15°C for the fast and slow phases,
respectively (Fig. 7B). At this point, MoR has one electron in the
flavin and one in the heme-Fe but cannot accept more electrons since
NADH must transfer two electrons at once to FAD. Intermolecular
transfer of an electron between two MoR2
molecules to generate MoR1
and
MoR3
overcomes this barrier to full reduction.
Intermolecular transfer is a dismutation process and second order with
a dependence on enzyme concentration since MoR is a monomer.
Dismutation is expected to be slow and the rates of reduction of
FAD and heme-Fe in the second phase of the reduction reaction are
probably rate limited by the in- termolecular electron
transfer rate. For SoMoR, Ratnam et al. (1997)
found the intermolecular
electron transfer rate to be 2 µM
1
s
1. They also noted that the dissociation of
NAD+ from reduced SoMoR was slow with a rate
constant of 12 s
1, and interpreted this to mean
internal reduction of heme-Fe by FADH2 was gated
by breakdown of the charge-transfer complex between reduced flavin and
NAD+. Our results do not agree with this concept
since in the first phase of the reaction heme-Fe is clearly reduced
with a high rate constant. Dissociation of NAD+
is more likely to be involved with limiting the second phase of the
reaction, because NAD+ must obviously exit the
active site before the second NADH reduction step can occur. Thus, we
conclude that both the FAD and heme-Fe centers are reduced in the rapid
first phase of the reaction between MoR and NADH. This is consistent
with the high rates observed (kcat = 1,300-1,800 s
1 at 25°C) for steady-state MoR
catalyzed reduction of Cyt c by NADH (Table II), which requires the
involvement of the heme-Fe (Fig. 1; Campbell, 1999
).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Stopped-flow rapid-scan spectra of the transient
kinetics of ZmMoR. Four spectral sets were collected for each reaction
under anaerobic conditions in 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, at
15°C, using the Hi-Tech KinetAsyst Double Mixing Stopped-Flow System
and analyzed with SPECFIT software, as described in "Materials and
Methods." A, Representative NADH reduction reaction after mixing 2.6 µM ZmMoR with 70 µM NADH. B, Representative
turnover reaction after 2.6 µM ZmMoR was mixed with a
solution of 75 µM NADH and 180 µM FeCN. The
final concentration of ZmMoR was 1.3 µM. The "dead
time" of the instrument or time elapsed before the first spectra was
taken, was less than 2 ms and 50 µL of each reactant was in-
jected into the 22.5-µL reaction cuvette.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Kinetics of NADH reduction of the heme-Fe and FAD
redox centers of ZmMoR. Single-wavelength kinetic traces for reduction
of the cofactors of ZmMoR were extracted from Figure 6A spectra at
A557 for heme-Fe and
A460 for FAD using the SPECFIT program. The
data were exported to Sigma Plot and fitted with its regression
function to derive rate constants. Two exponential terms were required
for a high correlation fit. A, Trace of the average change in
A557 over 0.4 s for three spectral
data sets of the NADH reduction of ZmMoR. B,
A557 curve fitted data (line) overlaid with
the actual data points. C, Trace of average change in
A460 over 0.4 s for three spectral
data sets of the NADH reduction of ZmMoR. D,
A460 curve fitted data (line) overlaid with
the actual data points.
|
|
The turnover reaction catalyzed by ZmMoR with NADH and FeCN was also
observed with the stopped-flow spectrophotometer system at 15°C (Fig.
6B). Here MoR remains largely oxidized during the entire reaction with
perhaps 10% to 15% reduction of FAD and heme-Fe as judged by
transient changes in A460 and
A557 during the first 100 to 150 ms. The
apparent decrease of the MoR A413 peak is
because of the decrease in A420 due to
reduction of FeCN to colorless ferrocyanide and oxidation of NADH. The
NADH-reduced MoR is rapidly oxidized by FeCN with a few electrons
trapped in the heme-Fe that are eventually oxidized via the FAD. For
the transient turnover reaction of ZmMoR at 15°C, the initial
kcat is 1,700 s
1,
which corresponds well to the steady-state
kcat of 2,300 s
1,
at 25°C.
A kinetic scheme for the NADH:FeCN reductase activity of MoR is
presented in Figure 8A. Two possible
catalytic cycles are presented: one where NAD+
remains bound to the MoR during the transfer of electrons from reduced
FAD to FeCN (the inner cycle) and one where NAD+
dissociates from the reduced enzyme before electrons are transferred to
FeCN (outer cycle with primed rate constants). Heme-Fe remains mostly
oxidized during the observed catalytic cycle and is shown oxidized. Two
steps in the catalytic cycle are irreversible: (a) reduction of the FAD
by bound NADH and (b) electron transfer from reduced MoR to FeCN. The
efficiency of these irreversible steps is represented by the
steady-state
kcat/Km for
NADH and FeCN, which are 200 to 230 and 80 to 140 µM
1
s
1, respectively (Table II). The rate constant
for reduction of the FAD in MoR by bound NADH
(k2) was found to be 700 s
1 (Fig. 7D). The average rate constant for the
reduction of FeCN by reduced MoR (k8 and
k9) is equivalent to rapid-reaction
kcat, 1,700 s
1 at
15°C (Fig. 6B). The steady-state kcat is
2,300 to 2,700 s
1 at 25°C (Table II). The
rate of breakdown of the
NAD+/FADH2 charge-transfer
complex (k7'), which was shown to be 12 s
1 for SoMoR (Ratnam et al., 1997
), is too slow
to be involved in the catalytic cycle and so the outer cycle is not
catalytically competent. Thus, electrons must be transferred to FeCN
from reduced FAD with bound NAD+.
NAD+ probably dissociates rapidly from the
oxidized enzyme, since the Ki is
approximately 2 mM (Trimboli and Barber, 1994
;
Trimboli et al., 1996
; Barber et al., 1997
; Campbell, 1999
), which
suggests k7 is large and on the order of
the kcat. Overall, MoR catalysis of FeCN
reduction by NADH is probably limited by the electron transfer rate to
FeCN, but this rate is very fast and only small amounts of reduced MoR
are observed in the transient turnover reaction.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
MoR catalytic cycles for its FeCN and Cyt c
reductase activities. A, FeCN reductase reaction of MoR. B, Cyt c
reductase reaction of MoR. MoR is represented by the bar and its
cofactors with their redox state shown for each reaction step. Note
that the heme-Fe of MoR remains oxidized during the FeCN reductase
reaction. The numbering of the rate constants is based on the Cyt c
reductase reaction since it has more steps. The inner cycle where
NAD+ remains bound to the enzyme during oxidation
by the electron acceptor is probably the preferred pathway. Thus, the
rate constants in the outer cycle, which are for events also taking
place in the inner cycle, are shown with corresponding primed rate
constants. At the end of the outer cycle, MoR is fully oxidized and the
enzyme is ready to begin another cycle, which is shown by circling the
MoR representation to simplify the graphic.
|
|
Also a kinetic scheme for the NADH:Cyt c reductase activity of MoR is
presented (Fig. 8B). The same style is used here as for FeCN reductase
activity with two possible catalytic cycles: one where
NAD+ remains bound to reduced MoR until the
enzyme is oxidized (the inner cycle) and one where
NAD+ dissociates from the reduced enzyme before
electrons are transferred to Cyt c (outer cycle with primed rate
constants). In addition to the two irreversible steps where MoR is
reduced by NADH and oxidized by Cyt c, there are two obligatory
reductions of heme-Fe by FADH2 and flavin
semiquinone as the reaction progresses. The catalytic efficiency of the
combined reduction and oxidation processes are the steady-state
kcat/Km for
NADH and Cyt c, 130 to 140 and 220 to 300 µM
1
s
1, respectively (Table II). Whereas the rate
of reduction of FAD by bound NADH (k2) is
700 s
1 (the same as with FeCN), the rate of
heme-Fe reduction (k3) is 300 s
1 (Fig. 7B). The steady-state
kcat is 1,300 to 1,800 s
1, which is about 60% of the FeCN reductase
kcat (Table II). Thus, the slower rate of
turnover with Cyt c as electron acceptor is probably due to the slower
internal electron transfers required to reduce the heme-Fe before Cyt c
can be reduced. Again dissociation of NAD+ from
reduced MoR (k7') was found to be too slow
for the outer catalytic cycle to be competent. Also it is clear that if
dissociation of NAD+ from oxidized MoR
(k7) were rate limiting, then the rates of both MoR catalyzed reactions would be expected to be the same. Thus,
internal electron transfer may be rate-limiting in the MoR catalyzed
reduction of Cyt c, but this needs to be confirmed by transient kinetic
analysis of this reaction.
The implications for the NADH reduction of nitrate catalyzed by holo-NR
are that electron transfer from reduced flavin forms to heme-Fe appears
to be sufficient to support catalysis, which has a
kcat of approximately 200 s
1 and
kcat/Km values
for NADH and nitrate of 1 to 3 µM
1
s
1, at 30°C (Campbell, 1999
). Moreover,
dissociation of NAD+ from the charge-transfer
complex is either not required or not limiting for electron transfer
from reduced flavin to the heme-Fe, and dissociation of
NAD+ from oxidized enzyme is also not rate
limiting. These conclusions support and extend previous suggestions for
the rate-limiting step in NR catalysis being either electron transfer
from reduced Cyt b to the Mo center or reduction of nitrate by
MoIV (Campbell, 1999
). The rates of nitrate
reduction catalyzed by NR with reduced methyl viologen and reduced
bromphenol blue as the electron donor are greater than the NADH
supported reaction (Barber and Kay, 1996
; Campbell, 1999
). Since these
artificial electron donors either bypass Cyt b to donate electrons
directly to the Mo center or keep the Mo center more highly reduced
than NADH can via the MoR fragment, it appears that electron transfer is more rate-limiting than the capacity of NR to reduce nitrate at the
Mo center. These possible rate-limiting steps in NR catalysis are
currently under study using stopped-flow and rapid-quench kinetic
methods similar to those used here to study electron transfer and
turnover of MoR.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cloning of MoR Fragments of NR in P. pastoris
The general strategy for cloning MoR fragments of spinach
(Spinacia oleracea L.) and corn (Zea
maize L.) NR into Pichia pastoris vectors in
Escherichia coli involved either limited restriction digestion or PCR to capture the coding sequences from various NR cDNAs
(Table I). After the cloning operation was confirmed by nucleotide
sequencing, the purified plasmid construct was linearized at a unique
restriction site outside the target protein expression cassette and
transformed into P. pastoris either by the spheroplast method or electroporation (Higgins and Cregg, 1998
). Positive P.
pastoris transformants were selected by either growth without His supplements for the pHIL-D2 construct or Zeocin resistance for
pPICZ and pGAPZ constructs (all P. pastoris vectors were
from Invitrogen, San Diego). Putative positive P.
pastoris cell lines were grown in 50- to 100-mL shake flask
cultures for selection by target protein expression level. P.
pastoris cells, harvested from shake flasks, were suspended in
50 mM Na-Pi, pH 7.3, which is called "breaking buffer,"
and extracted by shearing with glass beads (0.5 mm) in a BeadBeater
(BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, OK). After centrifugation, the FeCN
reductase activity in the supernatant was assayed as previously
described (Campbell, 1992
). Clones with the highest FeCN reductase
activity were selected and grown on methanol-containing plates to
determine Mut phenotype. Finally, glycerol stocks of selected clones
were prepared and stored at
80°C.
Spinach MoR (SoMoR) was prepared from the SPNR117 cDNA (Shiraishi et
al., 1991
), in the pHIL-D2 P. pastoris expression
vector, as previously described (Ratnam et al., 1997
). The selected
SoMoR P. pastoris clone has the phenotype
MutS, as shown by slow growth on methanol culture plates.
Corn MoR (ZmMoR) coding sequence was obtained via PCR with ZmNR1S cDNA as template (Campbell, 1992
) and, after restriction digestion of the
purified 1.1-kb PCR product, directionally cloned into the
EcoRI (5' end) and NotI sites of pPICZ-A.
Purified ZmMoR/pPICZ DNA was linearized at the unique
PmeI restriction site and transformed into P.
pastoris GS115 by electroporation (Higgins and Cregg, 1998
).
Putative positive clones were selected on Zeocin plates (0.1 mg/mL). As
expected for pPICZ transformants, the ZmMoR P. pastoris
clone has the phenotype Mut+, as shown by rapid growth on
methanol culture plates.
For ZmMoR+, the ZmNR1 cDNA (Gowri and Campbell, 1989
) was the template
for PCR. The 5'-PCR primer contained an engineered start codon along
with an EcoRI restriction site. The 1.8-kb PCR product
was purified, restriction digested with EcoRI and
SnaBI, and directionally cloned by ligation into
previously digested pPICZ-C and pGAPZ-C vectors. The purified
ZmMoR+/pPICZ and ZmMoR+/pGAPZ plasmids were linearized with
PmeI and AvaII, respectively, and transformed into P. pastoris GS115 by electroporation
(Higgins and Cregg, 1998
). Putative positive clones were selected on
Zeocin plates (0.1 mg/mL). As expected, the ZmMoR+/pPICZ P.
pastoris clone has the phenotype Mut+.
Expression of MoR Fragments in P. pastoris Shake Flasks
and the Fermenter
The SoMoR and ZmMoR+/PICZ P. pastoris clones were
expressed as 1-L cultures in 2.8-L Fernbach flasks at 30°C. All four
P. pastoris clones expressing the MoR fragments were
also cultured in a BioFlo3000 fermenter with 10-L capacity and
maintained at 30°C (New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc.,
Edison, NJ). Starter cultures of SoMoR, ZmMoR, and ZmMoR+/PICZ for
inoculating the fermenter were grown for 12 h in 0.5 L of minimal
media containing glycerol (Higgins and Cregg, 1998
). Starter cultures
were transferred to the fermenter, which had been partially filled with
5.5 L of glycerol minimal media. After the glycerol was exhausted, the fermenter cultures were grown for 4 to 6 h with a glycerol (50%, w/v) feed at the rate of approximately 18 mL L
1
h
1. In some cases, a mixed feed of glycerol and methanol
was used to help the cells make a transition to growth on methanol.
Finally, the fermenter cultures were fed methanol as the sole carbon
source with the rate of the feed being adjusted by determining the
availability of oxygen to the culture when the methanol feed was shut
off. This is done by measurement of the time needed to get an "oxygen spike" using the dissolved oxygen probe in the fermenter (Higgins and
Cregg, 1998
). The objective being to maintain the fermenter culture at
an optimum growth rate without adding excess methanol, which may poison
the culture. During the growth on methanol, the pH was maintained at 5 by addition of NH4OH using the pH stat system of the
BioFlo3000, which supplied the nitrogen for the culture. In addition,
micronutrients (Invitrogen) were supplied to the cultures in the
methanol feed at 12 mL L
1. It is important to note that
HPLC grade methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis) is used in growing
P. pastoris. Samples of the culture (10-15 mL) were
taken from the fermenter every few hours to evaluate cell growth and
the expression of target protein. A600 of
the culture and quantity of wet cell mass per milliliter of culture were monitored, as well as, the amount of total protein and FeCN reductase in the centrifuged, cell extract prepared in breaking buffer
using a Mini-BeadBeater. When a high cell density and a high level of
FeCN reductase activity were achieved, the cells were harvested, and
the wet cell paste was stored at
80°C. For ZmMoR+/GAPZ, the 0.5-L
starter culture for the fermenter was grown in the same manner using
Glc as the carbon source. In this case, the ZmMoR+ fragment is
constitutively expressed when the cells are cultured on Glc in the
fermenter. The culture was grown for 14 h to exhaust the Glc in
the original medium and a Glc (40% w/v) feed was begun at 12 mL
L
1 h
1, which was maintained until the
culture was harvested.
Purification and Biochemical Characterization
Crude extracts of P. pastoris cells suspended in
50 mM K-Pi and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.3, were prepared
using a Bead-Beater and 0.5-mm glass beads at 4°C with 15 s of
cell breakage followed by a 30-s interval for cooling with this cycle
repeated 20 times; or by passage twice through a continuous flow Dyno
Mill model KDL (Glen Mills, Clifton, NJ) at a rate of 10 L
h
1 with 0.6-L stainless steel grinding container filled
with glass beads and maintained at
5°C to 0°C. The crude extract
was centrifuged to remove glass beads and cell debris and the
supernatant retained for further processing by freezing in 500-mL
aliquots at
80°C.
SoMoR was purified by (NH4)2SO4
precipitation and blue Sepharose chromatography (Ratnam et al., 1997
).
ZmMoR and ZmMoR+ were purified by immunoaffinity chromatography on
monoclonal antibody Zm2,69 Sepharose with elution at pH 11 (Hyde et
al., 1989
; Campbell, 1992
). Prior to elution at pH 11, the monoclonal
antibody gel with bound enzyme was washed with 150 mM NaCl
in 50 mM MOPS, and 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.3, to
remove non-specifically bound proteins. All purified MoR fragments were
concentrated and buffer exchanged into 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0. FeCN and Cyt c reductase activity assays were carried out as previously
described (Campbell, 1992
). Crude extract protein content was evaluated
with the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent. Purified MoR fragment protein
content was determined by A413 and an
extinction coefficient of 120 mM
1
cm
1 (Redinbaugh and Campbell, 1985
; Campbell, 1992
).
SDS-PAGE and western blotting with polyclonal antibodies to corn CbR
were done as previously described (Campbell, 1992
).
UV-visible spectra were taken in oxidized and NADH-reduced states with
the 8453 diode array spectrophotometer (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA)
at 25°C. Steady-state kinetic analysis of the MoR fragments was done
in 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, at 25°C, by varying NADH, FeCN,
and Cyt c concentrations in appropriate ranges and monitoring the rate
of NADH oxidation. Gel filtration was done in 50 mM MOPS,
150 mM NaCl, pH 7.3, on a Sephacryl 300 HR 16/60 column
using an FPLC system calibrated with Gel Filtration LMW and HMW
Calibration Kits (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).
Arabidopsis NR (AtNR2) was purified as previously described (Su et al.,
1997
). Native molecular size for SoMoR, ZmMoR, and ZmMoR+ were also
estimated by gradient PAGE using 4% to 20% acrylamide gels (Novex,
San Diego), which were electrophoresed for 20 h at 4°C
with standard Tris-Gly, pH 8.3. AtNR2 was used as a standard for
comparison, which is known to be a mixture of dimers and tetramers with
molecular mass was approximately 200 and approximately 400 kD,
respectively (Su et al., 1997
). The gel filtration HMW standard proteins described above with bovine serum albumin added were also used
to estimate molecular mass values.
Electrochemical Analysis
Redox potentials for the FAD and heme-Fe cofactors were
determined by two methods: (a) anaerobic redox titration followed by
spectral analysis and (b) cyclic and square wave voltammetry with
protein films formed on carbon paste electrodes in manner similar to a
previous studies (Heering et al., 1998
). Voltammetry was performed with
a cv-50-W Voltammetric Analyzer (BAS, West Lafayette, IN) in a 15-mL
electrochemical cell equipped with a Ag/AgCl reference electrode and a
platinum wire as the auxiliary electrode and carbon paste working
electrodes. SoMoR, ZmMoR, ZmMoR+, and ZmCbR (50-200 µM)
were in 116 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, and 100 mM MgCl2, for the initial analysis and then made to 10 to 15 mM NAD+ by addition of solid nucleotide with
the concentration determined spectrally. The addition of 100 mM MgCl2 promotes communication of the protein
redox cofactors with the electrode and does not denature the enzyme, as
was previously described for the recombinant spinach flavin domain
(Barber et al., 1997
). After packing and polishing the carbon paste
electrode, a protein film was formed on the electrode by dipping it in
the protein solution and drying the film in air briefly. Cyclic and
square wave voltammograms were obtained with the protein film electrode
in 7 mL of 116 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 100 mM
MgCl2, which had been purged with ultra-high purity argon
and magnetic stirring prior to the analysis. During analysis, the
solution was blanketed with argon. The cyclic and difference square
wave voltammograms were analyzed using the BAS Windows software to
obtain the mid-point potentials and, in some cases, by mathematical
deconvolution using semidifferentiation to resolve the peak redox
potentials when multiple redox centers were analyzed in MoR and MoR+.
All mid-point redox potentials were converted to the standard hydrogen
electrode potential. ZmCbR was prepared as previously described (Hyde
and Campbell, 1990
; Campbell, 1992
).
Stopped-Flow Rapid-Scanning Kinetics
Stopped-flow kinetic analysis of ZmMoR was done on a Hi-Tech
KinetAsyst Double Mixing Stopped-Flow System (Hi-Tech Scientific, Wiltshire, UK) using a spectrophotometer with a KinetaScan diode array
detector. All stopped-flow kinetic experiments were done in 25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, at 15°C in an anaerobic chamber with
less than 1 ppm oxygen. Anaerobic ZmMoR (2.6 µM) was
mixed in the stopped-flow system with anaerobic NADH (70 µM) to observe reduction of FAD and heme-Fe of MoR from 1 to 398 ms over the wavelength range of 350 to 700 nm with 100 spectra
collected at 4-ms intervals. To observe turnover kinetics of ZmMoR, the
enzyme (2.6 µM) was mixed anaerobically in the
stopped-flow system with an equal volume mixture of NADH (150 µM) and FeCN (360 µM) and data collected from 350 to 700 nm for time courses of 1 to 199 ms (100 spectra at 2-ms
intervals), 2 to 398 ms (100 spectra at 4-ms intervals), and 1 to 999 ms (500 spectra at 2-ms intervals). In both types of experiments, 50 µL of enzyme was mixed with 50 µL of the other reactants to yield a
final volume of 100 µL, of which 22.5 µL was in the observation
cuvette. For NADH reduction of ZmMoR, four identical experiments were
carried out and results averaged for the three spectra sets with the
most similar results. Kinetic analysis was done with SPECFIT (Spectrum
Software Associates, Chapel Hill, NC). Single-wavelength time
courses for ZmMoR reduction by NADH were exported from SPECFIT to Excel
(Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and averaged, and results were fitted to a
rate equation with two exponential terms and a constant in Sigma Plot
5.0 using the regression function (SPSS, Chicago). For ZmMoR turnover
with NADH and FeCN, initial velocities of NADH oxidation and FeCN
reduction were obtained by exporting from SPECFIT time courses for
A350 and A420 and
calculating slopes for 1 to 41 ms. The rate constants for turnover were
calculated from the slopes using extinction coefficients of 5.7 mM
1 cm
1 for NADH at 350 nm and
1.02 mM
1 cm
1 for FeCN at 420 nm, the volume of the reaction mixture (0.1 mL) and amount of enzyme in
the chamber (0.13 nmol of ZmMoR).
Profs. David J. Lowe and Roger Thorneley (Nitrogen Fixation
Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK) are thanked for the use of
the stopped-flow rapid-scanning spectrophotometer system and Lawrie
Skipper and Gillian Ashby (John Innes Center) for assistance with the
experiment. Undergraduate students, Gary Martin, Daniel Miller, Heidi
A. Wiitanen, and David M. Poggi are thanked for assistance with MoR
fragment purifications. The Nitrate Elimination Company (Lake Linden,
MI) is thanked for providing the voltammetric analyzer.
Received November 1, 1999; accepted January 31, 2000.