|
Plant Physiol, July 2000, Vol. 123, pp. 997-1004
Involvement of Brassinosteroids in the Gravitropic Response of
Primary Root of Maize1
Seong-Ki
Kim,2
Soo Chul
Chang,2
Eun Joo
Lee,
Woo-Sook
Chung,
Young-Soo
Kim,
Seongbin
Hwang, and
June Seung
Lee*
Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 156-756,
Korea (S.-K.K., W.-S.C., Y.-S.K.); Department of Biological Science,
Ewha Woman's University, Seoul 120-750, Korea (S.C.C., E.J.L.,
J.S.L.); and Department of Molecular Biology, Sejong University, Seoul
143-747, Korea (S.H.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Exogenously applied brassinolide (BL,
10 9-10 5 M) increased
gravitropic curvature in maize (Zea mays) primary roots.
The BL-enhanced gravitropic curvature was clearly promoted in the
presence of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA,
10 10-10 8 M), indicating that
BL is interactive with IAA during the gravitropic response. The
interactive effect between BL and IAA was completely diminished by
treatment of p-chlorophenoxy isobutric acid, an auxin
action antagonist. The activation of the gravitropic response by BL in
the absence and in the presence of IAA was nullified by application of
2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, a polar auxin transport inhibitor. The data
indicate that brassinosteroids (BRs) might be involved in
auxin-mediated processes for the gravitropic response. Gas
chromotography-selected ion-monitoring analysis revealed that maize
primary roots contained approximately 0.3 ng g 1 fresh
weight castasterone as an endogenous BR. Exogenously applied castasterone also increased the gravitropic response of maize roots in
an IAA-dependent manner. This study provides the first evidence, to our
knowledge, for occurrence and gravitropic activity of BRs in plant roots.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Since brassinolide (BL) has been
identified as a plant growth promoting substance in rape pollen (Grove
et al., 1979 ), over 40 members of related steroids, collectively named
as brassinosteroids (BRs), have been characterized in the entire plant
kingdom (Kim, 1991 ; Fujioka, 1999 ). Early studies investigated possible
physiological roles of BRs by exogenous application. The results of
those studies suggested that BRs might be involved in the regulation of
cell elongation and division, leaf bending, reproductive and vascular development, membrane polarization and proton pump, source/sink definition, and modulation of stress (for review, see Yokota and Takahashi, 1986 ; Mandava, 1988 ; Sakurai and Fujioka, 1993 ; Arteca, 1995 ; Sasse, 1997 , 1999 ; Yokota, 1997 ; Clouse and Sasse, 1998 ). Recent
studies using BR-deficient Arabidopsis, pea, and tomato mutants
revealed that BR-deficiency caused abnormal pleiotropic developments
such as reduced shoot elongation (dwarfism), reduced fertility, delayed
senescence, and altered vasculature. These mutants can be rescued only
by application of BRs (for review, see Yokota, 1997 ; Clouse and Sasse,
1998 ; Clouse and Feldmann, 1999 ). Thus, BRs are now regarded to be
essential substances for growth and development of plants.
The occurrence of BRs has been demonstrated in almost every aerial part
of plants such as pollen, flower, shoot, vascular cambium, leaf, fruit,
and seed (Kim, 1991 ; Fujioka and Sakurai, 1997 ; Fujioka, 1999 ). It is
possible that because of very low concentrations, however, the presence
of BRs in roots has not yet been demonstrated. Nevertheless,
exogenously applied BRs inhibited primary root extension and lateral
root formation, and they occasionally promote elongation and
adventitious rooting at less than 1 pM of BRs
(Roddick and Guan, 1991 ; Clouse et al., 1993 , 1996 ; Sasse, 1994 ;
Fujioka and Sakurai, 1997 ). In Lotus japonicus, treatment with uniconazole induced stuntedlateral roots, but simultaneous treatment of BR reduced the number to the control value, suggesting that endogenous BRs may regulate initiation of lateral roots (Kawaguchi et al., 1996 ). Recently, a BR-insensitive mutant, bri1, has
been isolated from mutagenized Arabidopsis plants in which root
elongation was not inhibited by BRs, but by other plant hormones,
auxin, gibberellin, cytokinin, abscisic acid, and ethylene, similar to the wild type (Clouse et al., 1996 ). These results indicate that BRs
also have important regulatory functions in growth and development of plant roots.
Gravitropism is the directional movement of a plant in response to the
stimulus of gravity. When a seedling is placed in the horizontal
position, the primary root exhibits a downward curvature, known as
positive gravitropism, whereas the primary shoot shows upward
curvature, known as negative gravitropism. The gravitropic curvature of
both gravitropisms is a consequence of differential cell elongation on
opposite sides of the organ (root or shoot), which is believed to be
mediated by an auxin gradient caused by a redistribution of auxin
across the organs (Chen et al., 1999 ). Some responses induced by BRs
seem to be similar to those induced by auxin. Some auxin-induced
responses are synergistically enhanced by BRs, indicating that both
hormones are interactive in some aspects of plant growth and
development (Yopp et al., 1981 ; Takeno and Pharis, 1982 ; Cohen and
Meudt, 1983 ; Katsumi, 1985 ; Eun et al., 1989 ; Kim et al., 1990 ; Fujii
et al., 1991 ; Fujioka et al., 1998 ; Sasse, 1999 ). Meudt (1987) has
reported that the gravitropic curvature of bean hypocotyls (negative
gravitropism) is enhanced by the application of BR. The enhancement of
the gravitropic response by BR was also demonstrated in tomato
hypocotyls (Park, 1998 ), indicating that BRs might participate in the
regulation of shoot gravitropism. These findings suggested that BRs may
also be involved in the regulation of root gravitropism and led us to
examine the effects of BRs on gravitropic response in maize (Zea
mays) primary roots, a system whose gravitropic response has been
well characterized. In this work, we found that BRs increased
indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-induced gravitropic response. We also
demonstrated the occurrence of BR in the maize primary roots, which
provides the first evidence for the presence of BR in plant roots.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects of BL on Elongation and Gravitropic Curvature
Dose response of BL for elongation and gravitropic curvature of
maize primary roots was investigated at concentrations between 10 9 and 10 5
M. The gravitropic curvature was increased by BL at all
concentrations tested and was greatest at 10 7
M (Fig. 1). In contrast,
elongation of the roots was increased by BL from
10 9 to 10 7
M, with the maximum increase at 10 8
M BL. Concentrations of BL over 10 6
M inhibited elongation. The fact that BL shows differential
dose response between elongation and gravitropic response in maize roots indicates that BL may control and/or affect both events separately.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Dose response for the effect of BL on gravitropic
response and elongation in maize primary roots. For gravitropic
response experiments, the roots were pre-incubated in 5 mM
MES-Tris (pH 6.8) containing various concentrations of BL for 2 h
and placed horizontally for 4 h at 25°C ± 1°C for
gravistimulation treatment. The pre-incubation and gravistimulation
treatment was performed in a water-saturated chamber. In growth
experiments, the roots were pre-incubated and treated as in gravitropic
response experiments, except that roots were positioned vertically
during treatment. All experiments were undertaken at 25°C ± 1°C with aeration in the dark. Values in the figure represent the
means ± SE of five replicates.
|
|
Interaction of BL and IAA in Gravitropic Curvature
It is well known that IAA is involved in root gravitropic response
(Chen et al., 1999 ) and that BR interacts with IAA. The results
illustrated in Figure 1 prompted us to investigate whether BR interacts
with IAA during the gravitropic response. IAA alone showed no effect at
concentrations less than 10 8 M, but
showed inhibitory effects at 10 7 and
10 6 M IAA. In the presence of
10 7 M BL, which exhibits the
strongest stimulation of gravitropic response, significant promotion of
gravitropic curvature was found at 10 10 to
10 8 M IAA (Fig.
2). Moreover, the reduced gravitropic
curvature at 10 7 IAA was clearly reversed to
levels that exceeded control value in the presence of BL. Taken
together, it is suggested that BL and IAA might have an interactive
effect on the gravitropic response.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Dose response for the effect of IAA on gravitropic
curvature in maize primary roots in the presence or absence of
10 7 M BL. The roots were
pre-incubated in a solution of 5 mM MES-Tris (pH 6.8)
containing various concentrations of IAA with or without
10 7 M BL for 2 h, and placed
horizontally for 5 h at 25°C ± 1°C for gravistimulation
treatment. Values in the figure represent the means ± SE of five replicates.
|
|
The time-course analysis of gravitropic response in the presence of BL
and/or IAA shows that IAA (10 8 M)
alone slightly reduced gravitropic curvature compared with untreated
controls from 2 h after gravistimulation (Fig.
3). BL (10 7
M)-increased gravitropic response is evident from 2 h
after the horizontal orientation. Combined application of IAA and BL
shows increased gravitropic curvature similar to BL alone for the first 3 h of graviresponse. Thereafter, the curvature continues over the
level of BL alone. Therefore, BL increases the gravitropic curvature of
maize roots in the presence of low levels of exogenously applied IAA,
as well as normal IAA levels.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Time-course analysis of gravitropic curvature in
the presence and absence of IAA and BL. The primary roots were
pre-incubated in solutions of 5 mM MES-Tris (pH 6.8)
containing no hormone (control), 10 8
M IAA, 10 7 M BL, or
10 8 M IAA plus
10 7 M BL for 2 h and then
placed horizontally at 25°C ± 1°C. Values in the figure
represent the means ± SE of five replicates.
|
|
The order of treatment of IAA and BL was important for showing
synergistic activity in several bioassays (Takeno and Pharis, 1982 ;
Cohen and Meudt, 1983 ; Katsumi, 1985 ; Mandava, 1988 ; Kim et al., 1990 ).
Thus, the order of both hormone treatments on the gravitropic response
was investigated. However, significant difference at 5 h after the
start of gravistimulation treatment was observed, irrespective of the
order of treatments (data not shown).
The stimulatory effect of BL on the gravitropic response in the
presence of IAA indicates that BRs might be involved in IAA-mediated gravitropic processes in the maize roots. To confirm that notion, the
influence of antiauxins on the gravitropic response promoted by BL was
investigated. p-Chlorophenoxy isobutric acid
(PCIB), an auxin action antagonist, decreased the root
gravitropic curvature and diminished the interactive effect between IAA
and BL on the gravitropic response (Fig.
4A). 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA), an
auxin transport inhibitor, greatly delayed the gravitropic curvature
regardless of BL and/or IAA treatments (Fig. 4B). These results
strongly indicate that BL exerts its role through auxin effects and
auxin transport is essential for the regulation of the root gravitropic
response by BL.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Effects of antiauxins, PCIB (A) or TIBA (B) on
gravitropic curvature induced by BL in the presence or absence of IAA
in maize primary roots. The roots were pre-incubated in 5 mM MES-Tris (pH 6.8) containing BL
(10 7 M) or BL plus IAA
(10 8 M) in the presence or absence
of PCIB (10minus]6 M) and TIBA
(10 5 M) for 2 h, and placed
horizontally for 5 h at 25°C ± 1°C. Values in the figure
represent the means ± SE of five replicates.
|
|
Identification of Castasterone from Maize Primary Roots
The results described above prompt the question of whether BRs
exist in maize roots. Thus, we examined the presence of BRs in maize
primary roots. BRs in 3-d-old whole seedlings (150 g) were
preliminarily analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
after purifying as described in "Methods and Materials." As
summarized in Table I, bismethaneboronate
(BMB) of an endogenous BR showed prominent ions at m/z 512, 497, 399, 358, 327, 287, and 155, which are identical to those of
castasterone (CS) BMB. On GC, the retention time
(Rt) of BMB of the BR (16.45 min) was exactly the same as that of authentic CS BMB. Thus, the endogenous BR
in maize seedlings was determined to be CS. Coexistence of teasterone,
typhasterol, dolichosterone, and 28-norCS with CS has been demonstrated
in different cultivars of maize (Suzuki et al., 1986 ; Gamoh et al.,
1990 ; Sekimoto et al., 1997 ). However, no trace of these BRs was
detected in the seedlings.
Thus, CS in primary roots of the seedlings was quantified by
GC-selected ion monitoring (SIM) using deuterium-labeled
([26,28-2H6]) CS as an
internal standard. As shown in Figure 5,
ions at m/z 512 and 155, due to BMB of CS, were detected at
the same Rt (16.45 min) as those of the
authentic specimen. Thus, the presence of CS in primary roots of maize
was unequivocally demonstrated. The endogenous level of CS in the roots
was determined on the basis of the deuterated standard being
approximately 0.3 ng g 1 fresh weight
roots.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Identification and quantification of CS in maize
primary roots by GC-SIM. The ions at m/z 512 and 155 for BMB
of endogenous CS were detected at 16.45 min, which is identical with
that of authentic CS BMB (Table I). The relative ratio of endogenous CS
against [2H6]CS added as
an internal standard (1 µg) measured by 512/518 or 155/161 was
approximately 1:13.
|
|
Effect of Other BRs on Gravitropic Response in Maize Primary
Roots
The identification of CS as an endogenous BR prompted us to
investigate its gravitropic activity in the maize primary roots. As
shown in Figure 6, CS also increased the
gravitropic curvature, and the CS-induced gravitropic response was also
stimulated by IAA. However, the CS-induced gravitropic response was
lower than that induced by BL. This suggested that there is a
structure-activity relationship of BRs in the gravitropic response of
maize primary roots. Tyhasterol and 6-deoxo-CS, direct precursors of CS
(Yokota, 1997 ; Clouse and Sasse, 1998 ), are hard to detect in the rice lamina inclination assay that is known to the most sensitive assay for
BRs. Thus, the possibility for detection of these BRs in gravitropic response of maize roots was investigated. Unfortunately, no significant increments of gravitropic response by either BR was observed, regardless of additional application of IAA or not.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Effect of several BRs on the gravitropic response
of maize primary roots in the presence or absence of IAA. The roots
were pre-incubated in solutions of 5 mM MES-Tris (pH 6.8)
containing no hormone (control) or 10 7
M BRs with or without 10 8
M IAA for 2 h, and placed horizontally for 3 h at
25°C ± 1°C. Values in the figure represent the means ± SE of five replicates.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The role of BRs in gravitropic response has been demonstrated in
shoots such as hypocotyls of bean and tomato (Meudt, 1987 ; Park, 1998 ).
In both plants, however, BR-enhanced gravitropic response in the
presence of added auxin has not been clearly detected. In contrast,
current study shows that the gravitropic response induced by BRs was
clearly enhanced in the presence of auxin in maize primary roots.
Moreover, the enhanced gravitropic curvature in the presence of auxin
was diminished by application of antiauxins, PCIB and TIBA. These
results indicate that there are differential action mechanisms of BRs
between shoot and root gravitropic response, and that root gravitropism
is a complex process in terms of mode of action of BRs.
BL displayed its stimulatory effect in the presence of IAA (Fig. 2),
indicating that BL increases the sensitivity of maize roots to IAA. BL
enlarged the IAA dose response. Therefore, it can be argued that BL
increases overall capacity of the root to the number of occupied IAA
receptors according to Firn's terminology (1986) . However, it is not
certain how the sensitivity is increased by BL. To characterize the
BL-induced changes in root sensitivity to IAA, more studies are needed.
One possibility is a study of BL effects on auxin binding capacity.
Prior to this study, BRs have not been identified in the roots, which
has limited our understanding of the physiological roles of BRs in
roots. To date, the possible functions of BRs in the roots include
inhibition of growth and formation of adventitious and lateral roots
with occasional promotions by very low concentrations (Roddick and
Guan, 1991 ; Clouse et al., 1993 , 1996 ; Sasse, 1994 ; Fujioka and
Sakurai, 1997 ). This concept is still controversial because of the
uncertain occurrence of BRs in roots. This study is the first to
confirm the presence of BRs in roots, which suggests that BRs are
important regulatory substances for growth and development of roots.
The endogenous level of BR in maize roots (approximately 0.3 ng
g 1 fresh weight) is comparable to leaves and
shoots in other higher plants (Roddick and Guan, 1991 ; Fujioka, 1999 )
that show abnormal growth and differentiation by defects of BRs.
Therefore, more data on activities of BRs in plant roots other than
growth inhibition and the gravitropic response can be expected in the
near future.
CS, a 6-keto derivative of BL, shows less biological activity than that
of BL in BRs bioassays. In Catharanthus roseus cells, exogenously applied [3H]CS was successfully
converted into [3H]BL, demonstrating that CS is
a direct biosynthetic precursor of BL (Yokota et al., 1990 ). Recently,
the conversion of CS to BL was confirmed by cell-free systems prepared
from cultured cells of Marchantia polymorpha and
Phaseolus vulgaris (S.-K. Kim, K.-S. Han, T.-W. Kim,
S. Takatsuto, and T. Yokota, unpublished data). Nevertheless, the
role of CS as only a biosynthetic precursor of BL is debated. CS itself
shows strong activity in many bioassays for BRs. In some plant
materials, exogenously applied CS or 24-epiCS is not converted into BL
or 24-epiBL, respectively, but into other metabolites such as
conjugates (Yokota et al., 1991 ; Suzuki et al., 1993 ; Adam and
Schneider, 1999 ) or 3-epiCS (Suzuki et al., 1995 ). Moreover, CS alone
has been identified from some plants that did not contain BL (Kim,
1991 ; Fujioka, 1999 ). Therefore, it is possible that CS itself has
biological activities. In this study we identified CS, but not BL, from
maize seedlings and primary roots, which is similar to other reports
that indicate CS occurs together with other BRs but not with BL in
several different maize cultivars (Suzuki et al., 1986 ; Gamoh et
al., 1990 ; Sekimoto et al., 1997 ). The identification of only CS from
the primary roots of maize may suggest that CS is the active BR
for gravitropic response in the roots. However, our study cannot
rule out the possibility that BL is the active principle for the
gravitropic response in the maize roots, because exogenously applied BL
shows stronger activity than that of CS and endogenous level of BL in plants is sometimes too low to be detected by GC-MS analysis.
The activation of gravitropic curvature of primary roots of maize by
application of BL is a fast response. The accelerated gravitropic
curvature between BL-treated and untreated primary roots was detected
within 3 h after gravitropic stimulation and was amplified by IAA.
The activity of BL in the gravitropic curvature of maize roots,
preferably in the presence of IAA, might be useful as a BR bioassay.
The minimum detectable amount of BR in the curvature assay is
approximately 10 9 M BL equivalents (Fig.
1), which is comparable with that of the rice lamina inclination assay,
where the minimum detectable amount of BL in the rice lamina
inclination assay is 0.0001 µL L 1, or
approximately 2 × 10 10 M.
Furthermore, the curvature assay needs only 3 to 4 d for the entire assay (measurements were made 3-4 h after BL application), which is much shorter than the rice lamina inclination assay, which
needs 12 d for the entire assay and the measurements are typically
made 2 d after BR application). To develop a time saving bioassay
for BRs, the usefulness of the gravitropic activity to detect BRs in
maize primary roots is now under investigation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Materials and Chemicals
Maize (Zea mays L. cv Golden Cross Bantam) seeds
were washed several times with tap water and soaked in distilled water
for 24 h. After soaking, the seeds were placed on trays (27 × 20 × 2.5 cm) covered by water-saturated paper towels. To keep
the seeds moisturized, they were covered with one more layer of
water-saturated paper towel. The trays were positioned vertically at
28°C ± 1°C in the dark with 70% relative humidity. After
germination in the dark for 2 d, seedlings with 1.5- to 2 cm-long
straight-grown primary roots were selected and used in experiments.
Seedlings grown in the same condition for 3 d were used to
identify BRs in primary roots.
All chemicals used in this study were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.
(St. Louis). The BRs used as authentic standards in this study were
provided by Prof. Takao Yokota (Teikyo University, Utsunomiya, Japan).
Measurement of Elongation of Maize Primary Roots
Root caps of seedlings were immersed for 2 h in a MES
[2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid]-Tris
[tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane] buffer (5 mM, pH
6.8), which contained various concentrations of IAA and/or BL, for
2 h with aeration at 25°C ± 1°C. To measure the length
of primary roots, seedlings were positioned vertically in a wall of a
lucent chamber and exposed to a closed circuit digital camera. The
image of the root was then magnified 70 times on a computer monitor
with the SECANT computer program (Yongma, Seoul, Korea) and recorded
every 30 min up to 4 h.
Measurement of Gravitropic Curvature of Maize Primary Roots
The root caps of seedlings were immersed in the buffer solution
(5 mM MES-Tris, pH 6.8) containing various concentrations of IAA and/or BRs for 2 h with aeration at 25°C ± 1°C.
The hormone-treated roots were then placed horizontally in a lucent
Plexiglas container (13 × 9 × 6 cm) for gravistimulation.
Using the closed circuit digital camera and computer program Image-Pro
Plus (Yongma), the image of the root was magnified 10 times on a
monitor and recorded every 30 min for 5 h. The angles of curvature
were measured using the program after the gravistimulation treatment.
Bioassay for BRs
The rice lamina inclination assay was used to detect BRs
activity (Arima et al., 1984 ).
Identification of BRs in Whole Seedlings and Primary Roots of
Maize
The 3-d-old whole seedlings (150 g) were homogenized and
extracted with 90% (v/v) methanol (three times in 500 mL). The extracts were concentrated to aqueous phase in vacuo
and re-extracted with chloroform (three times in 500 mL). The
chloroform-soluble extracts were reduced to dryness in vacuo and
partitioned between n-hexane and 80% (v/v) methanol
(three times in 500 mL). After drying, the 80% (v/v) methanol soluble
fraction was partitioned again between phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and
ethyl acetate (500 mL × 3). The ethyl acetate-soluble fraction
(400 mg) was purified by silica gel (40 g, Merck, Rahway, NJ) column
chromatography. The elution was performed stepwise with chloroform
containing 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%,
20%, 50%, and 100% (v/v) methanol (400 mL each). The 4% and 5%
methanol-in-chloroform fractions that showed biological activity
in the rice lamina inclination assay were combined and chromatographed
on Sephadex LH-20 column (bed volume 340 mL, 22 × 900 mm,
Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology, Uppsala) using a 4:1 mixture of
methanol:chloroform at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min 1. The
bioactive fractions with 0.65 to 0.75 of elution volume/total volume
were combined and subjected to octadecylsilane column (10 g,
LiChroprep RP-18, Merck) eluted with aqueous methanol with an
increase in methanol content every 10 mL (50%, 55%, 60%,
65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, and 100%). The
biologically active fraction eluted with 75% (v/v) methanol was
analyzed by a capillary GC-MS after methaneboronation.
Segments of maize primary roots (240 g) obtained from 3-d-old seedlings
were homogenized and extracted with 90% (v/v) methanol (three times in
500 mL). After concentrating to aqueous phase in vacuo,
[26,28-2H6]CS (1 µg) was added to the
extracts as an internal standard for quantitative analysis. The
extracts were re-extracted and solvent-partitioned by the same methods
described above. The obtained ethyl acetate soluble fraction (300 mg)
was subjected to silica gel (20 g) eluted stepwise with chloroform
containing 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%,
20%, 50%, and 100% (v/v) methanol (100 mL of each). The fractions
eluted with 4% and 5% methanol-in-chloroform were combined and
purified by the same Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography mentioned
above. The active fractions (0.65-0.75 of elution volume/total volume)
was combined, dissolved in small volume of methanol, and subjected to a
reversed phase HPLC (8 × 100 mm, 4-µm Novapak C18 column,
Waters, Milford, MA) at a flow rate 1 mL/min with 45% (w/v)
acetonitrile. The fractions were collected every minute and fractions
13 to 15, which correspond to Rt of
authentic CS (13.7 min), showed biological activity. The fractions were
combined and analyzed by GC-SIM (m/z 155 and 512) after methaboronation.
GC-MS and GC-SIM Analysis
GC-MS and GC-SIM analyses were carried out by a 5973 mass
spectrometer (electron impact ionization, 70 electron volt,
Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) connected to 6890 gas chromatograph
fitted with a fused silica capillary column (HP-5, 0.25 × 30 m, 0.25-µm film thickness, Hewlett Packard). GC conditions
were as follows: on-column injection mode, He 1 mL min 1;
oven temperature, 175°C for 2 min; and thermal gradient, 40°C to 280°C min 1 and then 285°C min 1.
Prior to injection the samples were treated with pyridine containing methaneboronic acid (2 mg mL 1) for 30 min at 70°C.
Replication of Experiments and Statistical Analysis of Data
All experiments for gravitropic curvature and elongation of
maize primary roots were performed at least three times. In every experiment, 20 primary roots were used. To test for significance of the
data, mean values were calculated with Student's t tests.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. T. Yokota (Department of Biosciences,
Teikyo University, Utsunomiya, Japan) for the generous gift of authentic brassinosteroids and helpful discussion and to Dr. K.H. Hasenstein (Department of Biology, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette) for critically reviewing to improve this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received December 2, 1999; accepted March 15, 2000.
1
This research was supported by Korean Ministry
of Education (grant no. BSRI-97-4422 to J.S.L.) and the
interdisciplinary research program of the Korea Science and Engineering
Foundation (grant no. 1999-1-203-002-3 to S.-K.K.).
2
These authors contributed equally to the paper.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail jslee{at}mm.ewha.ac.kr; fax
82-2-3277-2385.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Adam G, Schneider B
(1999)
Uptake, transport, and metabolism.
In
A Sakurai, T Yokota, SD Clouse, eds, Brassinosteroids: Steroidal Plant Hormones. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 113-136
-
Arima M, Yokota T, Takahashi N
(1984)
Identification of brassinolide-related steroids in the insect gall and healthy tissues of the chestnut plant.
Phytochemistry
23: 1587-1591
[CrossRef]
-
Arteca RN
(1995)
Brassinosteroids.
In
PJ Davis, ed, Plant Hormones Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology, Ed 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 206-213
-
Chen R, Rosen E, Masson PH
(1999)
Gravitropism in higher plants.
Plant Physiol
120: 343-350
[Free Full Text]
-
Clouse SD, Feldmann KA
(1999)
Molecular genetics of brassinosteroid action.
In
A Sakurai, T Yokota, SD Clouse, eds, Brassinosteroids: Steroidal Plant Hormones. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 163-189
-
Clouse SD, Hall AF, Langford M, McMorris TC, Baker ME
(1993)
Physiological and molecular effects of brassinosteroids on Arabidopsis thaliana.
J Plant Growth Regul
12: 61-66
-
Clouse SD, Langford M, McMorris TC
(1996)
A brass-inosteroid-insensitive mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple defects in growth and development.
Plant Physiol
111: 671-678
[Abstract]
-
Clouse SD, Sasse JM
(1998)
Brassinosteroids: essential regulators of plant growth and development.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
49: 427-451
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
-
Cohen JD, Meudt WT
(1983)
Investigations on the mechanism of the brassinosteroid response: I. Indole-3-acetic acid metabolism and transport.
Plant Physiol
72: 691-694
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eun J-S, Kuraishi S, Sakurai N
(1989)
Changes in levels of auxin and abscisic acid and the evolution of ethylene in squash hypocotyls after treatment with brassinolide.
Plant Cell Physiol
30: 807-810
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Firn RD
(1986)
Growth substance sensitivity: the need for clearer ideas, precise terms, and purposeful experiments.
Physiol Plant
67: 267-272
-
Fujii S, Hirai K, Saka H
(1991)
Growth-regulating action of brassinolide in rice plant.
In
HG Cutler, T Yokota, G Adam, eds, Brassinosteroids, Chemistry, Bioactivity, and Application, ACS Symposium Series 474. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 306-311
-
Fujioka S
(1999)
Natural occurrence of brassinosteroids in the plant kingdom.
In
A Sakurai, T Yokota, SD Clouse, eds, Brassinosteroids: Steroidal Plant Hormones. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 21-45
-
Fujioka S, Noguchi T, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S
(1998)
Activity of brassinosteroids in the dwarf rice lamina inclination bioassay.
Phytochemistry
49: 1841-1848
[CrossRef]
-
Fujioka S, Sakurai A
(1997)
Brassinosteroids.
Nat Prod Rep
14: 1-10
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Gamoh K, Okamoto N, Takatsuto S, Tejima I
(1990)
Determination of traces of natural brassinosteroids as dansylaminophenylboronates by liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection.
Anal Chim Acta
228: 101-105
[CrossRef]
-
Grove MD, Spencer FG, Rohwededer WK, Mandava NB, Worley JF, Warthen JD Jr, Steffens GL, Flippen-Anderson JL, Cook JC Jr
(1979)
Brassinolide, a plant growth promoting steroid isolated from Brassica napus pollen.
Nature
281: 216-217
[CrossRef]
-
Katsumi M
(1985)
Interaction of a brassinosteroid with IAA and GA3 in the elongation of cucumber hypocotyl sections.
Plant Cell Physiol
26: 615-625
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kawaguchi M, Imaizumi-Anraku H, Fukai S, Syono K
(1996)
Unusual branching in the seedlings of Lotus japonicus-gibberellins reveal the nitrogen-sensitive cell division within the pericycle on roots.
Plant Cell Physiol
37: 461-470
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kim S-K
(1991)
Natural occurrences of brassinosteroids.
In
HG Cutler, T Yokota, G Adam, eds, Brassinosteroids: Chemistry, Bioactivity, and Application, ACS Symposium Series 474. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 26-35
-
Kim S-K, Abe H, Little CHA, Pharis RP
(1990)
Identification of two brassinosteroids from cambial region of Scots pine (Pinus silverstris) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, after detection using a dwarf rice lamina inclination bioassay.
Plant Physiol
94: 1709-1713
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mandava NB
(1988)
Plant growth promoting brassinosteroids.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
39: 23-52
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
-
Meudt WT
(1987)
Investigations on mechanism of brassinosteroid response: VI. Effect of brassinolide on gravitropism of bean hypocotyls.
Plant Physiol
83: 195-198
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Park WJ
(1998)
Effect of epibrassinolide on hypocotyl growth of the tomato mutant diageotropica.
Planta
207: 120-124
[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Roddick JG, Guan M
(1991)
Brassinosteroids and root development.
In
HG Cutler, T Yokota, G Adam, eds, Brassinosteroids: Chemistry, Bioactivity, and Application, ACS Symposium Series 474. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 235-245
-
Sakurai A, Fujioka S
(1993)
The current status of physiology and biochemistry of brassinosteroids.
Plant Growth Regul
13: 147-159
[CrossRef]
-
Sasse JM
(1994)
Brassinosteroids and roots.
Proc Plant Growth Regul Soc Am
21: 228-232
-
Sasse JM
(1997)
Recent progress in brassinosteroid research.
Physiol Plant
100: 696-701
[CrossRef]
-
Sasse JM
(1999)
Physiological actions of brassinosteroids.
In
A Sakurai, T Yokota, SD Clouse, eds, Brassinosteroids: Steroidal Plant Hormone. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 306-311
-
Sekimoto H, Hoshi M, Nomura T, Yokota T
(1997)
Zinc deficiency affects the levels of endogenous gibberellins in Zea mays L.
Plant Cell Physiol
38: 1087-1090
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Suzuki H, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Yokota T, Murofushi N, Sakurai A
(1995)
Biosynthesis of brassinosteroids in seedling of Catharanthus roseus, Nicotiana tabacum and Oryza sativa.
Biosci Biotech Biochem
59: 168-172
-
Suzuki H, Kim S-K, Takahashi N, Yokota T
(1993)
Metabolism of castasterone and brassinolide in mung bean explant.
Phytochemistry
33: 1361-1367
[CrossRef]
-
Suzuki Y, Yamaguchi I, Yokota T, Takahashi N
(1986)
Identification of castasterone, typhasterol and teasterone from the pollen of Zea mays.
Agric Biol Chem
50: 3133-3188
-
Takeno K, Pharis RP
(1982)
Brassinosteroid-induced bending of the leaf lamina of dwarf rice seedlings: an auxin-mediated phenomenon.
Plant Cell Physiol
23: 1275-1281
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yokota T
(1997)
The structure, biosynthesis and function of brassinosteroids.
Trends Plant Sci
2: 137-143
[CrossRef][Web of Science]
-
Yokota T, Ogino Y, Suzuki H, Takahashi N, Saimoto H, Fujioka S, Sakurai A
(1991)
Metabolism and biosynthesis of brassinosteroids.
In
HG Cutler, T Yokota, G Adam, eds, Brassinosteroids: Chemistry, Bioactivity, and Application, ACS Symposium Series 474. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 86-89
-
Yokota T, Ogino Y, Takahashi N, Saimoto H, Fujioka S, Sakurai A
(1990)
Brassinolide is biosynthesized from castasterone in Catharanthus roseus crown gall cells.
Agric Biol Chem
54: 1107-1108
-
Yokota T, Takahashi N
(1986)
Chemistry, physiology, and agricultural application of brassinolide and related steroids.
In
M Bopp, ed, Plant Growth Substances, 1985. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 129-138
-
Yopp JH, Mandava NB, Sasse JM
(1981)
Brassinolide a growth promoting steroidal lactone: I. Activity in selected auxin bioassays.
Physiol Plant
53: 445-452
[CrossRef]
© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Nakamoto, A. Ikeura, T. Asami, and K. T. Yamamoto
Inhibition of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis by Either a dwarf4 Mutation or a Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis Inhibitor Rescues Defects in Tropic Responses of Hypocotyls in the Arabidopsis Mutant nonphototropic hypocotyl 4
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2006;
141(2):
456 - 464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Li, J. Xu, Z.-H. Xu, and H.-W. Xue
Brassinosteroids Stimulate Plant Tropisms through Modulation of Polar Auxin Transport in Brassica and Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
October 1, 2005;
17(10):
2738 - 2753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Whippo and R. P. Hangarter
A Brassinosteroid-Hypersensitive Mutant of BAK1 Indicates That a Convergence of Photomorphogenic and Hormonal Signaling Modulates Phototropism
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2005;
139(1):
448 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Cui, S. J. Neill, Z. Tang, and W. Cai
Gibberellin-regulated XET is differentially induced by auxin in rice leaf sheath bases during gravitropic bending
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2005;
56(415):
1327 - 1334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. WOODWARD and B. BARTEL
Auxin: Regulation, Action, and Interaction
Ann. Bot.,
April 1, 2005;
95(5):
707 - 735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Kimbrough, R. Salinas-Mondragon, W. F. Boss, C. S. Brown, and H. W. Sederoff
The Fast and Transient Transcriptional Network of Gravity and Mechanical Stimulation in the Arabidopsis Root Apex
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2004;
136(1):
2790 - 2805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Ge, H. Chen, J.-F. Jiang, Y. Zhao, M.-L. Xu, Y.-Y. Xu, K.-h. Tan, Z.-H. Xu, and K. Chong
Overexpression of OsRAA1 Causes Pleiotropic Phenotypes in Transgenic Rice Plants, including Altered Leaf, Flower, and Root Development and Root Response to Gravity
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2004;
135(3):
1502 - 1513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Mussig, G.-H. Shin, and T. Altmann
Brassinosteroids Promote Root Growth in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2003;
133(3):
1261 - 1271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Oono, C. Ooura, A. Rahman, E. T. Aspuria, K.-i. Hayashi, A. Tanaka, and H. Uchimiya
p-Chlorophenoxyisobutyric Acid Impairs Auxin Response in Arabidopsis Root
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2003;
133(3):
1135 - 1147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gil, E. Dewey, J. Friml, Y. Zhao, K. C. Snowden, J. Putterill, K. Palme, M. Estelle, and J. Chory
BIG: a calossin-like protein required for polar auxin transport in Arabidopsis
Genes & Dev.,
August 1, 2001;
15(15):
1985 - 1997.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Bishop and T. Yokota
Plants Steroid Hormones, Brassinosteroids: Current Highlights of Molecular Aspects on their Synthesis/Metabolism, Transport, Perception and Response
Plant Cell Physiol.,
February 1, 2001;
42(2):
114 - 120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|