Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.

Plant Physiol, August 2000, Vol. 123, pp. 1199-1200

ON THE INSIDE


    A Novel LOX-Dependent Defense Mechanism
TOP
A Novel LOX-Dependent Defense...
Life and Death at...
Secrets of a Checkered...
Al Catcher in the...
Phosphatidic Acid May Be...

In soybean, lipoxygenases (LOXs) are a multigene family consisting of at least eight members. LOXs are also multifunctional; in some cases, they act as storage proteins; in other cases, they catalyze the addition of molecular oxygen to polyunsaturated fatty acids---an important step in the pathway leading to the biosynthesis of various defense signal molecules including jasmonic acid. In two companion papers, Dubbs and Grimes (pp. 1269-1279, 1281-1288) identify the roles and locations of four of these LOXs (VLX A-D) in soybean pod walls and announce their discovery of a novel and potentially important defense mechanism in soybeans (Fig. 1). In their first contribution, the authors provide evidence that VLXD accumulates transiently in the endocarp just prior to seed filling, suggesting that it may act as a temporary storage protein. In the second paper, Dubbs and Grimes report that three other isoforms (VLXA, VLXB, and VLXC) immunolocalize to a single layer of cells in the soybean pod wall (the mid-pericarp layer or MPL). The cells of this undistinguished layer turn out to be quite extraordinary in that extensive regions of their cell walls are so thin that the protoplasm of one cell will, in some cases, bulge into the adjacent cell and occasionally rupture, apparently allowing some of the cellular contents to mix. Conceivably, this merging of cytoplasms in the MPL during mechanical stress could bring latent enzymes, such as LOX, into contact with previously unavailable substrates, leading to a burst in the production of defense signaling molecules.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.  


    Life and Death at the Edge
TOP
A Novel LOX-Dependent Defense...
Life and Death at...
Secrets of a Checkered...
Al Catcher in the...
Phosphatidic Acid May Be...

The hypersensitive response (HR) is a major form of defense initiated by plants to check the spread of many types of invading pathogens. The basic strategy underlying the HR is to localize the pathogen at the site of inoculation by means of the rapid necrosis of the surrounding tissue. Although the basic underlying strategy of the HR has long been recognized, much remains to be learned about its actual mechanism. Moreover, an even more fundamental question has arisen concerning whether cell death is a cause or a consequence of resistance. There are accumulating reports of cases where pathogen spread is checked even without cell death. Wright et al. (pp. 1375-1385) bring to bear a large arsenal of microscopic techniques upon the question of what is happening to the cells along the edge of the developing necrotic lesion (Fig. 2). Using tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) tagged with green fluorescent protein, the authors were able to determine the precise localization of TMV-infected cells in relation to the developmental progression of HR lesions. They conclude that the HR of tobacco leaves is a two-phase process. The first stage culminates with the collapse and dessication of most of the infected area. During the second stage, the remaining infected cells along the edge of the lesion are progressively eliminated. The authors propose that diffusible signals, possibly salicylic acid or ethylene, might prevent the surviving viruses along the edge of the initial lesion from spreading further.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Visible TMV-infected cells at edge of lesion.


    Secrets of a Checkered Leaf and a Ghostly Tomato
TOP
A Novel LOX-Dependent Defense...
Life and Death at...
Secrets of a Checkered...
Al Catcher in the...
Phosphatidic Acid May Be...

Carotenoids, such as beta -carotene and xanthophyll in the chloroplast, and lycopene in the tomato chromoplast, use phytoene as a precursor in their respective biosyntheses. Desaturases are involved in many steps in the biosynthesis of carotenoids, and several of them appear to be linked to a quinol:oxygen oxido-reductase. It has been found that inactivation of the immutans gene in Arabidopsis results in reduced phytoene desaturation and, consequently, reduced carotenoid content. The checkered appearance of the leaves of this phytoene-accumulating mutant are a manifestation of its constitutively low levels of carotenoids, and consequent susceptibility to photooxidative damage during early chloroplast differentiation (Fig. 3). Josse et al. (pp. 1427-1436) report that the immutans gene product, upon expression in Escherichia coli, confers a detectable cyanide-resistant electron transport component to isolated membranes. The sensitivity of this activity to n-propyl gallate, an inhibitor of the cyanide-resistant alternative oxidase (AOX) of plant mitochondria, as well as many structural similarities to AOX, suggest that the immutans gene product is a plastidic AOX homolog---a plastid terminal oxidase (PTOX)---that serves as a quinol: oxygen oxidoreductase during carotenoid synthesis. Genetic evidence also indicates a role for PTOX in determining the phenotype of the ghost mutant of tomato. This mutant also exhibits checkered leaves like immutans, but has pale petals and fruits. This, and the finding that the expression of PTOX parallels the expression of two desaturases involved in lycopene synthesis, suggests that PTOX also plays a role in carotenoid accumulation in petal and fruit chromoplasts.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.  


    Al Catcher in the Rye
TOP
A Novel LOX-Dependent Defense...
Life and Death at...
Secrets of a Checkered...
Al Catcher in the...
Phosphatidic Acid May Be...

In acid soils, which comprise over 40% of the world's arable lands, Al ions are soluble in the soil solution and are toxic to root growth and function. Understanding the physiological bases underlying Al phytotoxicity is, therefore, an important step toward developing cultivars that can thrive in acid soils. A major way by which Al-tolerant species detoxify Al is by secreting organic acids (e.g. malate, citrate, and oxalate) into the soil. These organic acids, in turn, form stable complexes with Al, thereby preventing its intra- and extracellular binding to the roots. In this issue, Li et al. (pp. 1537-1543) examine the mechanism(s) by which Al triggers these tolerant plants to secrete organic acids. They compared the response of rye, one of the more Al-tolerant graminaceous crops, with that of an especially tolerant cultivar of wheat (cv Atlas 66). These two plant types revealed very different mechanisms of organic acid secretion. The wheat cultivar showed a rapid release of malate in response to Al, possibly due to the opening of an anion channel. In contrast, rye roots released both malate and citrate in response to Al, but only after a lag phase of many hours. Al exposure also led to an increase in citrate synthase activity in rye but not in wheat. These differences indicate that these two grasses arrived at the same solution to the problem of Al phytotoxicity (organic acid secretion) by convergent evolution.


    Phosphatidic Acid May Be a New Lipid Signal
TOP
A Novel LOX-Dependent Defense...
Life and Death at...
Secrets of a Checkered...
Al Catcher in the...
Phosphatidic Acid May Be...

Plants recognize the presence of pathogenic microbes by perceiving chemical elicitors released by the pathogen directly or produced during the breakdown of fungal or plant cell walls. Evidence is emerging for a role for phospholipid signaling in the responses of plants to elicitors. Several types of elicitors have been found to activate phospholipase C in plants, thereby causing polyphosphoinositide turnover and the release of inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). Although a role for IP3 in releasing intracellular calcium is now well established in plants, the role of DAG in plants is less clear (in animal cells, it activates protein kinase C). Recent studies, however, have shown that DAG in plants is rapidly phosphorylated to phosphatidic acid (PA) by DAG kinase and that PA, in turn, is phosphorylated to diacylgycerolphosphate (DGPP). PA, of course, can also be produced directly by the activation of phospholipase D, but van der Luit et al. (pp. 1507-1515) report that nearly all of the PA produced by tomato suspension cells in response to three types of elicitors results from DAG kinase activity. Citing recent studies indicative of a role for PA in such diverse processes as algal deflagellation, alpha -amylase secretion, and stomatal closure, the authors put forth the provocative argument that PA itself may serve as a signaling molecule in plants and that DGPP production may be a means of attenuating the PA signal.

Peter V. Minorsky

Department of Biology, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601

© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Plant Biologists