|
Plant Physiol, December 2000, Vol. 124, pp. 1468-1471
Arabidopsis Microarray Service Facilities1
Ellen
Wisman* and
John
Ohlrogge
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Now that we know the complete
sequence of the Arabidopsis genome, how can plant biologists most
effectively use this 130 million-bp database to move toward fuller
understanding of plants? Microarray technology is one of a collection
of tools that can accelerate our transition from raw data toward
broader understanding. It is clear that knowing a gene sequence often
does not tell us its function. In fact, more than 30% of the
approximately 25,000 genes of Arabidopsis show no homology to genes of
known or hypothesized function. Thousands of additional genes are only
identified as members of classes such as protein kinases or
transcription factors, but no information is available about their
specific roles. The knowledge that there are 6,000 to 10,000 plant
genes with functions still to be discovered helps to define our level
of ignorance and challenges us to find new tools for investigating gene
function. It is an exciting challenge because uncovering the function
of these poorly understood genes is likely to lead to a very rich harvest of new discoveries. To help meet this challenge, the
Arabidopsis Functional Genomics Consortium (AFGC) was established to
coordinate the study of gene function by two synergistic methods:
microarray gene expression profiling and gene knockout mutagenesis.
AFGC is comprised of a team of investigators from four institutions. Michigan State University and the Carnegie Institute of Washington at
Stanford University have established microarray facilities. The
University of Wisconsin and Yale University coordinate gene knock-out
efforts as described in the accompanying article by Sandra
Austin-Philips. A website explains in more detail the objectives, procedures, and services of AFGC
(http://afgc.stanford.edu).
 |
PRINCIPLE OF MICROARRAYS |
Microarrays are conceptually very simple, but their production and
analysis can be technically demanding. Another name for such technology
might be "reverse northern-dot blots." DNA representing thousands
of genes is deposited on a solid surface at high density (1,000-10,000
"spots"/cm2). These DNA samples are then
hybridized with labeled probes derived from the mRNA population present
in plant sample(s). When two mRNA samples are compared (for example,
from control and treated plants) the intensity of the signal from label
bound to each spot reflects the relative mRNA abundance for each gene
represented on the array. Therefore, information on gene expression can
be obtained simultaneously for thousands of genes (Schaffer et
al., 2000 ). The probes are usually labeled with fluorescent
nucleotide derivatives and the arrays scanned by confocal microscopy.
mRNA species present at very low levels (a few copies per cell) can be
detected and the dynamic range over which expression can be monitored
is several orders of magnitude.
Microarrays can also be produced using oligonucleotides deposited by a
photolithographic process (Fodor et al., 1993 ; Lipshutz et al., 1999 )
and such Arabidopsis arrays representing about 8,000 genes are
commercially available from Affymetrix (Table
I). Although cDNA-based and
oligonucleotide-based arrays are well-proven technologies that provide
reliable data on expression patterns of thousands of genes, each type
of array has distinct advantages. For example, oligonucleotide arrays
can in many cases more easily distinguish between closely related
members of gene families. The arrays offered by AFGC, which are based
on spotting PCR products of cDNA or genomic DNA, also have several
advantages, which include lower costs, the ability to provide data on
different Arabidopsis ecotypes or closely related species such as
Brassica, and the ability to cohybridize probes from two or
more mRNA samples simultaneously on the same array.
 |
WORLD-WIDE ARABIDOPSIS MICROARRAY SERVICES |
An increasing number of laboratories have generated
Arabidopsis-specific microarrays (for review see, Richmond and
Somerville, 2000 ). The first papers reporting the use of Arabidopsis
microarrays applied to scientific problems have recently appeared (for
example, Schena et al. 1995 ; Ruan et al., 1998 ; Kehoe et al.,
1999 ; Girke et al., 2000 ; Reymond et al. 2000 ; Wang et al., 2000 ).
However, producing well-designed, comprehensive microarrays and the
controls needed to validate their output requires substantial
investments in microarray technology that are not feasible for
many laboratories or small institutions. Therefore, centralized
service facilities can allow many more scientists to implement this
technology using a consistent array design. To date there are at least
two publicly funded programs that provide world-wide microarray
services; the AFGC in the USA and GARNet in the UK. The AFGC, funded by
the National Science Foundation, began their services in early 2000, whereas GARNet's is scheduled to start from the first half of 2001. Both microarray services will be available to the community with no
proprietary rights with respect to intellectual property. Two
investigators coordinate the microarray service of the AFGC: Dr. Ellen
Wisman at Michigan State University and Dr. Shauna Somerville who leads
the AFGC Microarray group at the Carnegie Institute of Washington at
Stanford University. The group of Dr. Mike Cherry at Stanford
University provides bioinformatic support for data analysis and
tracking. Alternative Arabidopsis array services are available from
Monsanto and Incyte (Table I).
 |
STANFORD MICROARRAY DATABASE |
Microarrays can, in one experiment, provide information on
expression patterns for thousands of genes and this information often
can supply new insights about already described genes, as well as
useful clues about the function of uncharacterized genes (Fig.
1). Knowing in which tissue(s) a gene is
expressed and how expression changes under different environmental
conditions or is altered in mutants or transgenics can often build a
"modus operandi," which leads toward testable hypotheses about the
gene's function. Examining even a single microarray from, for example, a pathogen-infected plant can provide many previously unattainable and
unexpected insights. However, even greater power of microarray technology emerges when a large number of experiments can be compared. Increasingly sophisticated bioinformatics tools are being developed to
"cluster" or organize millions of datapoints and these tools sometimes reveal completely unexpected relationships that can shift our
thinking in exciting new directions. To fully realize these
opportunities requires that many experiments be collected into a common
database. In this regard, all experimental data generated by AFGC are
deposited in the Stanford Microarray Database (SMD;
http://genomewww4.stanford.edu/MicroArray/SMD/). The
expression profiles will be accompanied by a thorough description of
the experimental conditions for each RNA sample, which provides other users of the SMD a meaningful interpretation of the observed changes in
gene expression levels. A user of the SMD can now search for the
"expression history" of their favorite gene and receive microarray expression data for over 100 different experiments. Just as the huge
sequence databases have provided fertile territory for in silico
discovery, the SMD offers users throughout the world an opportunity to
mine this large data set on gene expression. Given the capacity of AFGC
of several hundred slides per year, its operation should yield a wealth
of gene expression data available to all plant scientists. This
exchange of information in the scientific community will generate an
important and extensive resource helpful in understanding the role of
genes in their respective biological pathways.
 |
DESIGN OF THE AFGC MICROARRAY |
Microarrays currently offered by AFGC are produced by spotting PCR
products of expressed sequence tag (EST) clones onto glass slides. The
Year 2000 array produced by AFGC contains DNAs representing 11,000 clones from the Michigan State University collection of ESTs (Newman et
al., 1994 ). The DNA preparations used as PCR templates were from the
same tubes used for the original EST sequencing performed by Dr. Tom
Newman. This unique resource, developed with National Science
Foundation funds and kindly made available to the AFGC by Dr. Tom
Newman, has allowed the AFGC to avoid handling errors often associated
with large gene sets. For The Year 2001 array a new collection of ESTs
has been selected that represent a significant increase in information
content and reduction of redundancy. The new set consists of many ESTs
from the original collection, a few thousand new EST clones, and
thousands of gene fragments amplified from genomic DNA with
gene-specific primers. The gene-specific fragments will be produced in
collaboration with the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC) in
the UK and Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. It is anticipated that the 2001 arrays will represent at
least 12,000 Arabidopsis genes.
The AFGC service accepts RNA samples from the users and performs
labeling, hybridization, and data collection. Protocols for preparing
samples, a list of clones on the arrays, and the guidelines for
application are available from the Internet at
http://afgc.n. The microarray service facility will
have approximately 400 arrays (slides) available in year 2001. Most
experiments include two arrays to be used for biological or technical
replicates of the same experiment. Academic laboratories may request up
to six experiments per year. Users of the service can choose for
immediate data release or for a 3-month delay. If microarray services
are oversubscribed, a science review committee independent of the AFGC
will rank the applications. Although the National Science Foundation
provides the major support for establishing AFGC arrays, the price of
$1,200 per experiment ($300 per mRNA sample hybridized) recovers the costs for labor and materials.
Members of the AFGC microarray team also are performing surveys of gene
expression patterns in different developmental stages and different
genotypes of Arabidopsis and much of this data is already publicly
available via SMD. The tissue survey including roots, leaves, siliques,
flowers, and stems has now provided a base data set for the community
and will enhance other expression studies by allowing researchers to
identify tissue specificity of their differentially expressed genes. In
addition to the tissue survey, AFGC will record the response to a
number of biological conditions such as circadian rhythms (Fig.
1).
The microarray service facility of GARNet is part of the Biotechnology
and Biological Sciences Research Counsel Investigating Gene Function
initiative and aims to create national facilities of genomics resources
for Arabidopsis and other plant research. The GARNet consortium
includes a public array service with the intention to generate an
array containing the complete transcriptome of Arabidopsis by 2003. This service is the responsibility of the NASC in collaboration with
the John Innes Center, Norwich and Horticulture Research International
(HRI) Wellesbourne. NASC's goal is to provide arrays in micro-
(slide), and macro- (filter) format to the community and to provide a
complete microarray service (labeling, hybridization, analysis, and
data mining) from the first half of 2001. GARNet policy determines that
emergent data will be made public within 3 to 6 months. It will
integrate prevailing public standards on array content and data
distribution, particularly those of the AFGC, The Arabidopsis
Information Resource, the National Center for Genome Resources, and the
European Bioinformatics Institute.
 |
CONCLUSION |
In conclusion, AFGC and GARNet will provide the ability for
hundreds of laboratories to carry out microarray experiments using carefully designed and well-controlled microarrays processed under consistent conditions. Collection of millions of datapoints from these experiments in common public databases will allow each researcher and the world-wide community to develop a much richer understanding of
gene expression patterns and how these patterns change.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received September 7, 2000; accepted September 25, 2000.
1
The Arabidopsis Functional Genomics Consortium
is funded by the National Science Foundation (grant no. DBI-9872638 to
Pam Green).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail wismanp{at}pilot.msu.edu; fax
517-353-9168.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Fodor SP, Rava RP, Huang XC, Pease AC, Holmes CP, Adams CL
(1993)
Multiplexed biochemical assays with biological chips.
Nature
364: 555-556
[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Girke T, Todd J, Ruuska S, White J, Benning C, Ohlrogge J
(2000)
Microarray analysis of developing Arabidopsis seeds.
Plant Physiol
124: 1570-1581
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kehoe DM, Villand P, Somerville S
(1999)
DNA microarrays for studies of higher plants and other photosynthetic organisms.
Trends Plant Sci
4: 38-41
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Lipshutz RJ, Fodor SP, Gingeras TR, Lockhart DJ
(1999)
High density synthetic oligonucleotide arrays.
Nat Genet
21: 20-24
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Newman T, Debruijn FJ, Green P, Keegstra K, Kende H, McIntosh L, Ohlrogge J, Raikhel N, Somerville S, Thomashaw M, Retzel LE, Somerville C
(1994)
Genes galore: a summary of methods for accessing results from partial sequencing of anonymous Arabidopsis cDNA clones.
Plant Physiol
106: 1241-1255
[Abstract]
-
Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE
(2000)
Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
12: 707-720
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Richmond T, Somerville S
(2000)
Chasing the dream plant EST microarrays.
Curr Opin Plant Biol
3: 108-116
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Ruan Y, Gilmore J, Conner T
(1998)
Towards Arabidopsis genome analysis: monitoring expression profiles of 1,400 genes using cDNA microarrays.
Plant J
15: 821-833
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
-
Schaffer R, Landgraf J, Perez-Amador M, Wisman E
(2000)
Monitoring genome wide expression in plants.
Curr Opin Biotechnol
11: 162-167
[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO
(1995)
Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray.
Science
270: 467-470
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang R, Guegler K, LaBrie ST, Crawford NM
(2000)
Genomic analysis of a nutrient response in Arabidopsis reveals diverse expression patterns and novel metabolic and potential regulatory genes induced by nitrate.
Plant Cell
12: 1491-1510
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Udall, J. M. Swanson, K. Haller, R. A. Rapp, M. E. Sparks, J. Hatfield, Y. Yu, Y. Wu, C. Dowd, A. B. Arpat, et al.
A global assembly of cotton ESTs
Genome Res.,
March 1, 2006;
16(3):
441 - 450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. C. Meyers, D. W. Galbraith, T. Nelson, and V. Agrawal
Methods for Transcriptional Profiling in Plants. Be Fruitful and Replicate
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2004;
135(2):
637 - 652.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. A. Hoekenga, T. J. Vision, J. E. Shaff, A. J. Monforte, G. P. Lee, S. H. Howell, and L. V. Kochian
Identification and Characterization of Aluminum Tolerance Loci in Arabidopsis (Landsberg erecta x Columbia) by Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping. A Physiologically Simple But Genetically Complex Trait
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2003;
132(2):
936 - 948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Schultz, M. P. Rumsewicz, K. L. Johnson, B. J. Jones, Y. M. Gaspar, and A. Bacic
Using Genomic Resources to Guide Research Directions. The Arabinogalactan Protein Gene Family as a Test Case
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2002;
129(4):
1448 - 1463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-i. Tanaka, N. Mochizuki, and A. Nagatani
Expression of the AtGH3a Gene, an Arabidopsis Homologue of the Soybean GH3 Gene, is Regulated by Phytochrome B
Plant Cell Physiol.,
March 1, 2002;
43(3):
281 - 289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ferrando, Z. Koncz-Kalman, R. Farras, A. Tiburcio, J. Schell, and C. Koncz
Detection of in vivo protein interactions between Snf1-related kinase subunits with intron-tagged epitope-labelling in plants cells
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 1, 2001;
29(17):
3685 - 3693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Ausubel
Arabidopsis Genome. A Milestone in Plant Biology
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2000;
124(4):
1451 - 1454.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|