Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.

Plant Physiol, December 2000, Vol. 124, pp. 1481-1482

Peter V. Minorsky

Department of Biology
Vassar College
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Science citations are a bit like secondary sexual characteristics: Those who carry large endowments tend to think they are important, whereas those who do not tend to dismiss the whole business as infinitely silly. There are numerous reasons why papers may be under-cited, and all of us can think of many profound and important contributions, particularly our own, that have, for a multitude of reasons, not received anywhere close to their fair share of citations. It is clear that if a paper is under-cited, it does not necessarily follow that the paper is unimportant. It is, however, difficult to refute the argument that a highly cited paper can be anything but a major contribution to the literature. It was with this thought in mind that a search of the literature was made for the most cited Arabidopsis articles of the 1990s (excluding reviews and technique papers). It is important to recognize that these papers, one from each year in the 1990's, represent the most-cited Arabidopsis papers as of October 2000. It is quite possible that these 10 papers represent the hares that will later be passed by the tortoises. Moreover, some of the runner-ups in a given year have been slighted, for they have been cited far more than some of the winners in other years. However, it is inarguable that all of the following papers have been enormously important. Therefore, let us raise our micropipettors on high and salute the authors of these trailblazing researchers in Arabidopsis biology.


    1990: Homeotic Flower Gene/Transcription Factor
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Certain genes result in homeotic transformations of floral organs. Mutations in the agamous gene result in the overall phenotype of a flower within a flower and the absence of stamens or carpels. Yanofsky et al. (1990) used a T-DNA insertion mutation to clone and characterize the Arabidopsis homeotic agamous gene. The protein encoded by the agamous gene resembles transcription factors from humans and yeast, and a homeotic gene from snapdragon.


    1991: Control of Body Patterns
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Mayer et al. (1991) reported on their systematic search for mutations that disrupt the spatial organization of Arabidopsis seedlings by altering embryogenesis. Mutations in nine genes were found to affect three different aspects of the body organization: apical-basal pattern, radial pattern, and shape. Their analysis supports the view that the relative positions of cells in the early embryo determine their developmental fates. This suggests that pattern formation in plant embryos may depend on positional information as it does in animal embryos.


    1992: LEAFY Controls Floral Meristem Identity
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Weigel et al. (1992) analyzed how mutant alleles of the Arabidopsis gene LEAFY affect the generation of the floral meristem. They found that LEAFY interacts with another floral control gene, APETALA1, to promote the transition from inflorescence to floral meristem. They cloned the LEAFY gene, and as expected from the mutant phenotype, found that LEAFY RNA is expressed strongly in young flower primordia. LEAFY expression precedes expression of the homeotic genes AGAMOUS and APETALA3, which specify organ identity within the flower. Furthermore, LEAFY was found to be the Arabidopsis homolog of the FLORICAULA gene, which controls floral meristem identity in snapdragon.


    1993: Ethylene Receptors Are Two-Component Sensors
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Ethylene insensitivity is conferred by dominant mutations in the ETR1 gene early in the ethylene signal transduction pathway of Arabidopsis. Chang et al. (1993) cloned the ETR1 gene by chromosome walking. Each of the four known etr1 mutant alleles was found to contain a missense mutation near the amino terminus. Although the sequence of the amino-terminal half of the deduced ETR1 protein is novel, the carboxyl-terminal half is similar in sequence to both components of the prokaryotic family of two-component signal transducers. Thus, an early step in ethylene signal transduction in plants may involve transfer of phosphate as in prokaryotic two-component systems.


    1994: Plant Disease Resistance Genes
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Plants recognize pathogens through the action of disease resistance (R) genes, which confer resistance to pathogens expressing unique corresponding avirulence (avr) genes. Bent et al. (1994) used a positional cloning strategy to isolate RPS2, an R gene of Arabidopsis that confers resistance to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria expressing the avirulence gene avrRpt2. The derived amino acid sequence of RPS2 was found to contain Leu-rich repeat, membrane-spanning, Leu zipper, and P-loop domains. Based on its amino acid sequence, the authors postulated that the role of the RPS2 gene product in defense signal transduction involves nucleotide triphosphate-binding, protein-protein interactions, and possibly the reception of an elicitor produced by the avirulent pathogen.


    1995: Dual Specificity of a Disease Resistance Gene
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

The molecular basis of gene-for-gene specificity is poorly understood. Grant et al. (1995) discovered that the Arabidopsis RPM1 gene renders a plant resistant to pathogens expressing either of two unrelated P. syringae avr genes. Despite this dual specificity, RPM1 encodes for protein-sharing molecular features with R-gene-encoded proteins that confer resistance to only one pathogen strain. The authors speculated that the evolution of R genes that determine multiple specificities may be one way of reducing the absolute number of R genes required for plant defense.


    1996: Molecular Basis of the KNOTTED Phenotype
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

The KNOTTED class of plant genes encodes for homeodomain proteins, and their expression patterns suggest they play an important role in shoot meristem function. Long et al. (1996) presented evidence that the Arabidopsis SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) gene, required for shoot apical meristem formation during embryogenesis, encodes a class-I KNOTTED-like protein. They also described the expression pattern of this gene in the wild-type plant. STM is the first gene shown to mark a specific pattern element in the developing plant embryo both phenotypically and molecularly.


    1997: The Control of Meristem Size
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Cell proliferation and cell differentiation normally are balanced in the shoot, so that the structure and size of the shoot meristem is maintained. However, Arabidopsis plants homozygous for mutations at the CLAVATA1 (CLV1) locus accumulate excess undifferentiated cells. Clark et al. (1997) described the molecular cloning and expression pattern of the CLV1 gene. The extracellular domain of CLV1 is composed of 21 tandem Leu-rich repeats that resemble the Leu-rich repeats found in many animal hormone receptors. Its resemblance to a receptor kinase suggests a role in signal transduction. The authors provide evidence that CLV1 expression in the inflorescence is specifically associated with meristematic activity.


    1998: Nitric Oxide in Disease Resistance
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Recognition of an avirulent pathogen triggers the rapid production of the reactive oxygen intermediates. This oxidative burst drives cross-linking of the cell wall, induces several plant genes involved in cellular protection and defense, and is necessary for the initiation of host cell death in the hypersensitive disease resistance response. Delledonne et al. (1998) showed that nitric oxide, which acts as a signal in the immune, nervous, and vascular systems, potentiates the induction of hypersensitive cell death in soybean cells by reactive oxygen intermediates and functions independently of such intermediates to induce genes for the synthesis of protective natural products. Moreover, inhibitors of nitric oxide synthesis compromise the hypersensitive disease resistance response of Arabidopsis leaves to P. syringae, promoting disease and bacterial growth.


    1999: Phytochrome Kinase
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED

Fankhauser et al. (1999) identified a phytochrome-binding protein, phytochrome kinase substrate 1, that is a substrate for light-regulated phytochrome kinase activity in vitro. In vivo experiments suggested that phytochrome kinase substrate 1 is phosphorylated in a phytochrome-dependent manner and negatively regulates phytochrome signaling. The data suggested that phytochrome signal transduction involves Ser-Thr phosphorylation.


    LITERATURE CITED
TOP
INTRODUCTION
1990: Homeotic Flower...
1991: Control of Body...
1992: LEAFY Controls Floral...
1993: Ethylene Receptors Are...
1994: Plant Disease Resistance...
1995: Dual Specificity of...
1996: Molecular Basis of...
1997: The Control of...
1998: Nitric Oxide in...
1999: Phytochrome Kinase
LITERATURE CITED
  • Bent AF, Kunkel BN, Dahlbeck D, Brown KL, Schmidt R, Giraudat J, Leung J, Staskawicz BJ (1994) RPS2 of Arabidopsis thaliana: a leucine-rich repeat class of plant-disease resistance genes. Science 265: 1856-1860 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Chang C, Kwok SF, Bleecker AB, Meyerowitz EM (1993) Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to 2-component regulators. Science 262: 539-544 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Clark SE, Williams RW, Meyerowitz EM (1997) The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89: 575-585 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Delledonne M, Xia YJ, Dixon RA, Lamb C (1998) Nitric oxide functions as a signal in plant disease resistance. Nature 394: 585-588 [CrossRef][Medline]
  • Fankhauser C, Yeh KC, Lagarias JC, Zhang H, Elich TD, Chory J (1999) PKS1, a substrate phosphorylated by phytochrome that modulates light signaling in Arabidopsis. Science 284: 1539-1541 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Grant MR, Godiard L, Straube E, Ashfield T, Lewald J, Sattler A, Innes RW, Dangl JL (1995) Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 gene enabling dual-specificity disease resistance. Science 269: 843-846 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Long JA, Moan EI, Medford JI, Barton MK (1996) A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 379: 66-69 [CrossRef][Medline]
  • Mayer U, Ruiz RAT, Berleth T, Misera S, Jurgens G (1991) Mutations affecting body organization in the Arabidopsis embryo. Nature 353: 402-407 [CrossRef]
  • Weigel D, Alvarez J, Smyth DR, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM (1992) LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69: 843-859 [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, Meyerowitz EM (1990) The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346: 35-39 [CrossRef][Medline]
© 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Plant Biologists