|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, December 2000, Vol. 124, pp. 1525-1531
UPDATE ON ROOT HAIRS
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Multicellular organisms possess a
diverse array of cell types, which vary in size, shape, composition,
and function. Therefore, a fundamental feature of development in
multicellular organisms is the proper specification and differentiation
of distinct cell types. In plants, the formation of hair cells in the
root epidermis has been employed for more than a century as a simple
model for studies of cell specification and differentiation (Cormack,
1935
; Bunning, 1951
; Cutter, 1978
). Root hair cells are easy to observe and analyze because of their long tubular projections (root hairs), which are thought to aid plants in nutrient uptake, anchorage, and
microbe interactions (Cutter, 1978
).
During the past several years, there has been a surge in research activity in root hair development, particularly in Arabidopsis. This heightened interest can be attributed to several features of root hair development that facilitate genetic analyses. First, root hairs are not essential for plant viability, which permits the recovery and analysis of all types of root hair mutants. Also, root hairs are visible on seedling roots shortly after seed germination, enabling high-density genetic screens on defined media in petri dishes. Furthermore, several aspects of root hair development in Arabidopsis occur in a remarkably predictable fashion, including the position-dependent patterning of hair cells and the localization of hair outgrowth at a precise site along the epidermal cell. These features provide the opportunity for efficient detection of mutant phenotypes.
This update article focuses on recent findings uncovered by the genetic analysis of root hair development in Arabidopsis. More broadly, the work outlined here provides a framework for understanding the genes and developmental processes that are necessary to construct a plant cell.
| |
CONTROL OF EPIDERMAL CELL SPECIFICATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During root development in most species, two cell types arise in
the epidermis: root hair cells and non-hair cells, meaning that,
following their formation by cell division in the root meristem, each
immature epidermal cell faces a simple either-or choice. It is
interesting that the specification mechanism that operates in the root
epidermis of Arabidopsis and other members of the Brassicaceae family
generates a distinct position-dependent pattern of cell types. Immature
epidermal cells located over the intercellular space between underlying
cortical cells (outside an anticlinal cortical cell wall; designated
the H-cell position) develop into root hair cells, whereas epidermal
cells over a single cortical cell (outside a periclinal cortical cell
wall; designated the N-cell position) develop into non-hair cells
(Cormack, 1935
; Bunning, 1951
; Dolan et al., 1994
; Galway et al., 1994
;
Fig. 1). In addition to the presence or
absence of a hair outgrowth, which is a relatively late feature of
epidermal development, epidermal cells in the H and N positions differ
from one another in cell division rate, vacuolation rate, cytoplasmic
features, and cell surface characteristics (Dolan et al., 1994
; Galway
et al., 1994
; Berger et al., 1998b
). The simple correlation between
cell position and cell type differentiation in the root epidermis of
these species implies that cell-cell communication events are important
in the establishment of cell identity.
|
Molecular genetic studies have defined several genes that influence the specification of root epidermal cell types in Arabidopsis. A summary of these genes and gene products will be presented here, largely in historical order.
TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA (TTG)
TTG was the first locus to be identified as essential
for root epidermal cell patterning in Arabidopsis (Galway et al.,
1994
). The homozygous recessive ttg mutants possess root
hairs on almost every root epidermal cell, implying that the normal
role of the TTG product is either to promote specification of the
non-hair cell type or to repress specification of the root hair cell
type in immature cells located in the N position. Because
ttg mutations alter all aspects of non-hair cell
differentiation (including early developmental characteristics such as
cell division rate, cytoplasmic density, and vacuolation rate), TTG is
likely to be an early-acting component in the cell specification
process (Galway et al., 1994
; Berger et al., 1998b
).
The TTG gene encodes a small protein with WD40
repeats (Walker et al., 1999
). Although the protein sequence does not
provide an immediate mechanistic understanding of TTG's role, other
WD-repeat proteins are involved in protein-protein interactions,
suggesting that TTG might be a component of a signal transduction
pathway or might interact with transcription factors that specify
epidermal cell fate. At present, the pattern of TTG gene
expression in the root is unknown.
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein (bHLH)
The analysis of the ttg mutant led to the notion that a
bHLH transcription factor in Arabidopsis contributes to root epidermal cell specification. Galway et al. (1994)
showed that ttg can
be functionally complemented by expressing the cDNA of the maize (Zea mays) R gene (encoding a bHLH transcriptional
activator; Ludwig et al., 1989
) under the control of the cauliflower
mosaic virus 35S promoter in Arabidopsis. In addition to restoring the normal specification of non-hair cells in the N position, the 35S::R transgene causes cells in the H position to
develop as non-hair cells (i.e. ectopic non-hair cells; Galway et al.,
1994
). Together, these findings suggest that an R-like bHLH protein
exists in Arabidopsis to promote non-hair cell specification and acts downstream from TTG.
GLABRA2 (GL2)
Homozygous recessive gl2 mutations cause nearly all
root epidermal cells to produce root hairs (Masucci et al., 1996
).
However, in contrast to the ttg mutations, gl2
mutations do not affect any of the other non-hair cell developmental
phenotypes; i.e., the usual position-dependent differences in cell
division rate, cytoplasmic density, and cell vacuolation rate are
observed in the gl2 root epidermis (Masucci et al., 1996
;
Berger et al., 1998b
). This implies that the GL2 product only
influences a portion (or one branch) of the non-hair cell specification pathway.
The GL2 gene encodes a homeodomain transcription factor
protein (Rerie et al., 1994
; DiCristina et al., 1996
), and it is
preferentially expressed in the differentiating non-hair epidermal
cells within the meristematic and elongation regions of the root
(Masucci et al., 1996
). GL2 gene expression is influenced by
TTG and by the maize R bHLH protein, with ttg mutations
causing a reduction in GL2 promoter activity and
35S::R expression causing ectopic GL2 promoter activity (Hung et al., 1998
). Together, these findings suggest
that TTG acts at an early stage in epidermis development to activate an
R-like bHLH transcription factor, which in turn positively regulates
the expression of GL2 (and perhaps other as yet unidentified
genes) in a cell position-dependent manner to specify the non-hair cell type.
CAPRICE (CPC)
The cpc mutant produces a reduced number of root hair
cells, implying that CPC is a positive regulator of root hair cell
specification (Wada et al., 1997
). Double mutant analysis shows that
the gl2 mutation is epistatic to cpc, which
suggests that CPC promotes root hair cell specification by acting as a
negative regulator of GL2.
A possible explanation for CPC's negative action is provided by the
nature of its gene product: CPC encodes a small protein with
an MYB-like DNA binding domain but without a typical
transcriptional activation domain (Wada et al., 1997
). Thus, one
possibility is that CPC acts as a transcriptional repressor of
GL2 by binding to its promoter and blocking its activation
in epidermal cells located in the H position. Consistent with this
possibility, expression of the CPC gene under control of the
cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (35S::CPC)
induces ectopic root hair cells (Wada et al., 1997
).
WEREWOLF (WER)
Homozygous recessive mutations affecting the wer locus
cause nearly all root epidermal cells to differentiate as root hair cells, beginning at an early stage of epidermis development. The WER gene encodes a typical MYB-type transcription factor of
the R2R3 class and is preferentially expressed in cells located in the
N position of the developing epidermis (Lee and Schiefelbein, 1999
).
The wer mutations also disrupt the position-dependent
pattern of GL2 gene expression, leading to a reduced and
largely random pattern of expression (Lee and Schiefelbein, 1999
).
Inspection of the GL2 promoter region known to be
critical for position-dependent gene expression (Hung et al., 1998
)
reveals the presence of putative MYB-binding site elements. Together,
these results support the possibility that WER directly regulates
GL2 transcription in cells located in the N position.
WER action is closely associated with a bHLH protein. The ability of
the maize R bHLH protein (encoded by the 35S::R
transgene) to influence root epidermis cell specification is dependent
on WER activity, and the WER protein physically interacts with the R
bHLH protein in the yeast two-hybrid assay (Lee and Schiefelbein, 1999
). Thus, a WER-bHLH interaction may be responsible for the transcriptional regulation of GL2 and other genes to specify
the non-hair cell fate in the Arabidopsis root epidermis.
The MYB encoded by WER and the truncated MYB encoded by
CPC appear to exert opposing effects on root epidermis
patterning. For example, the phenotype of the wer cpc double
mutant is intermediate, as compared with the wer or
cpc single mutants (Lee and Schiefelbein, 1999
). The similar
nature of the WER and CPC gene products and their opposing effects on
epidermal cell patterning suggest that they act competitively to
regulate epidermal cell fate.
A Model for Specification
The findings from these molecular genetic studies suggest a simple view for the control of root epidermal cell specification in Arabidopsis (Fig. 1). In brief, the fate of an epidermal cell may be determined by the relative abundance of the two MYB-type transcription factors, WER and CPC. In this model, each of these MYBs interacts with a common bHLH protein and the TTG protein. The WER-bHLH-TTG interaction generates an active transcription complex (due to the complete R2R3 MYB encoded by WER), whereas the CPC-bHLH-TTG interaction generates a complex that is unable to activate downstream gene transcription (due to the truncated MYB encoded by CPC; Fig. 1). According to this model, the normal epidermal cell pattern is caused by a relatively high concentration of WER in the N-position cells (which leads to activation of the non-hair cell differentiation pathway), and a relatively high concentration of CPC in the H-cell position (which leads to inactivation of the non-hair cell differentiation pathway and, by default, hair cell differentiation). Although this simple model accounts for the results to date, future work will be necessary to test and extend it. In particular, it will be necessary to identify the putative bHLH protein and test the hypothesis that it forms a transcriptional complex with the other components. It will also be important to define the mechanism that guides the position-dependent accumulation of the WER and CPC transcription factors.
Additional Specification Genes
Although their relationship to the WER/TTG/CPC/GL2 pathway remains
to be established, additional cell specification components have
recently been identified by genetic analyses. These include the
root hairless (rhl) mutants, rhl1,
rhl2, and rhl3, which possess nearly hairless
roots and show an early disruption in position-dependent cell
differentiation (Schneider et al., 1997
). Based on their mutant
phenotype, this group of genes is likely to define root hair cell
identity (Fig. 2). One of these,
RHL1, has been cloned and encodes a novel nuclear-localized
protein that does not regulate GL2 gene expression
(Schneider et al., 1998
). A simple possibility is that GL2
acts as a negative regulator of RHL1 in a linear pathway for
hair cell specification, although this is not consistent with the
observed early developmental defects in the rhl1 mutants and instead suggests independent pathways of control by these
components.
|
Additional mutations are also known to influence non-hair cell
specification, including the recessive ectopic root hair1
(ehr1), pom-pom1 (pom1), and
ectopic root hair3 (erh3) (Hauser et al., 1995
;
Schneider et al., 1997
). Each of these mutants produces an excessive
number of root hair cells, suggesting a role in the proper
specification and/or differentiation of non-hair cells (Fig. 2). It is
interesting that each of these also exhibits a significant
increase in radial cell expansion, suggesting a linkage between the
control of expansion and cell type differentiation. The molecular
analysis of these additional genes will likely lead to refinements in
the simple model outlined in Figure 1.
Features of the Cell Specification Mechanism
In addition to defining the molecular components of the pathway,
the cell specification genes have been used to uncover basic features
of the specification mechanism. One of the important questions is: At
what point during epidermis development do cells begin to adopt a
particular position-dependent fate? As mentioned above, it has long
been known that epidermal cells at the H and N positions exhibit
cytological differences within the meristematic region of the root,
indicating that cell specification must begin at a relatively early
stage of root development (Cutter, 1978
; Dolan et al., 1994
; Galway et
al., 1994
). This view has been extended by the recent use of two
reporter gene fusions, a GL2::GUS fusion construct
(Masucci et al., 1996
) and an enhancer-trap GFP construct (line J2301; Berger et al., 1998c
), each of which express their reporter gene in epidermal cells located in the N position within the
meristematic region of the root. Careful examination using these
sensitive reporters reveals position-dependent gene expression within,
or just one cell beyond, the epidermal/lateral root cap initials, which
implies that positional information may be provided (and cell fates
begin to be defined) within these initial cells (Masucci et al., 1996
;
Berger et al., 1998a
). Furthermore, the analysis of these reporters
shows that the specification pattern becomes established during
embryonic root development in Arabidopsis. Reporter expression is first
detected at the heart stage, when the epidermal tissue becomes distinct
from the ground tissue, and expression is later detected in a
position-dependent pattern that mirrors the postembryonic pattern
(Berger et al., 1998a
). Thus, it appears that specification signals are
provided during embryonic root development to establish the proper
pattern of gene activities that ultimately leads to appropriate
postembryonic cell type differentiation.
The establishment of position-dependent cell specification activity
during embryogenesis opened the possibility that positional information
is only provided to the developing epidermis during embryonic root
development and not postembryonically. To examine this possibility, two
sorts of experiments were conducted. In one, a detailed analysis of
peculiar epidermal cell clones was performed (Berger et al., 1998a
).
The clones examined were generated by rare postembryonic longitudinal
divisions of epidermal cells, which cause the two resulting daughter
cells to occupy different positions relative to the underlying cortical
cells. In these clones, the cells were observed to express marker genes
and to exhibit characteristics that are appropriate for cells in their new position (Berger et al., 1998a
). In a second set of experiments, specific differentiating epidermal cells were subjected to laser ablation such that neighboring epidermal cells were able to invade the
available space. Regardless of the original state of the ablated cell
or invading cell (differentiating hair cell or non-hair cell), the
final characteristics of the invading cell were nearly always determined by its new location rather than its old (Berger et al.,
1998a
). Therefore, in each of these sets of experiments, cells had
effectively undergone a postembryonic change in their position and, in
response, exhibited a change in their developmental fate. This supports
the view that positional information is provided postembryonically, not
only embryonically, to ensure appropriate cell specification in the
Arabidopsis root epidermis.
| |
CONTROL OF ROOT HAIR MORPHOGENESIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After an immature epidermal cell has adopted the root hair cell fate, it must undergo appropriate changes in its size, shape, and cellular characteristics. Which genes are employed to carry out the developmental program launched by the cell specification pathway? In this section, an overview of the genes that control root hair cell morphogenesis will be presented in the order of their developmental timing (Fig. 2).
Root Hair Initiation
The first visible sign of root hair morphogenesis is the formation of a protrusion at the site of hair outgrowth. Genetic analyses have shown that this step is composed of two parts: The cell must first be capable of initiating an outgrowth (root hair initiation) and then the cell must generate a protrusion of the appropriate size at the proper place (bulge formation).
Although technically difficult to distinguish from the class of mutants
affected in hair cell specification (discussed above), mutations that
alter root hair initiation are defined by a cytologically normal
pattern of immature epidermal cells (i.e. cells in the H and N
positions exhibit the typical differences in cytoplasmic and vacuolar
features) and an abnormal number of root hairs. All of the root hair
initiation mutants identified to date are related in some manner to the
action of the plant hormones auxin and ethylene. For example, the
auxin resistant2 (axr2; auxin, ethylene, and abscisic acid
resistant; Wilson et al., 1990
) and the axr3 (altered auxin
response; Leyser et al., 1996
) mutants produce very few root hairs,
although early cell specification appears normal. Mutations in another
root hair initiation gene, CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1
(CTR1), which encodes a Raf-like protein kinase proposed to
negatively regulate the ethylene signal transduction pathway (Kieber et
al., 1993
), causes root hairs to form on epidermal cells that are
normally hairless (Dolan et al., 1994
). The hair initiation defect of
the rhd6 mutant, which produces nearly hairless roots, can
be suppressed by the inclusion of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
(ACC; an ethylene precursor) or indole-3-acetic acid (an auxin) in the
growth media (Masucci and Schiefelbein, 1994
). Further evidence for the
critical role of ethylene and/or auxin is illustrated by the ability of
aminoethoxyvinyl-Gly (an ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor) or
Ag+ (an inhibitor of ethylene perception) to
block root hair formation (Masucci and Schiefelbein, 1994
; Tanimoto et
al., 1995
) and ACC to induce some ectopic root hairs in Arabidopsis
(Tanimoto et al., 1995
; Masucci and Schiefelbein, 1996
).
One possible explanation for the involvement of auxin and ethylene pathways in root hair initiation is that it provides a mechanism for environmental factors to influence root hair frequency. In this view, the newly formed epidermal cells in the Arabidopsis root may be tentatively defined to become hair or non-hair cells (due to the action of the early specification genes), but the ultimate proportion of hair-bearing cells may be determined by environmental factors such as humidity, ion concentrations, or shoot nutrient needs (mediated by auxin and/or ethylene pathways).
Bulge Formation
The root hair bulge is believed to result from the localized
loosening and yielding of the epidermal cell wall. Mutations in the
ROOT HAIR DEVELOPMENT1 (RHD1) and TIP
GROWTH1 (TIP1) loci lead to larger bulges than normal,
suggesting a defect in the spatial control of cell wall loosening
(Schiefelbein and Somerville, 1990
; Ryan et al., 1998
). In
rhd1 mutants, a normal hair ultimately forms from the
enlarged bulge, whereas tip1 mutants produce one or more
abnormally shaped hairs from each bulge.
One of the fascinating aspects of root hair morphogenesis in
Arabidopsis is the predictable location of the root hair outgrowth at
the basal end of the cell (the end near the root apex), which implies
that the process of bulge formation is influenced by cell polarity
(Fig. 2). The location of the bulge site is altered in the
rhd6, axr2, and ethylene resistant1
(etr1) mutants, which exhibit an overall basal shift in the
average bulge site, as well as the ethylene overproducer1
(eto1) mutant, which has a slight apical shift (Masucci and
Schiefelbein, 1994
). The effect of these mutations on bulge site
selection implies that hormone pathways influence the establishment or
perception of cell polarity in developing epidermal cells.
Tip Growth
The major portion of the root hair is formed by the process of tip growth, a specialized type of cell expansion employed to generate tubular-shaped cells. Tip growth is characterized by a highly organized, polar distribution of cellular components geared for efficient localized secretion and cell wall synthesis. Many genes involved in root hair tip growth have been defined by mutations in Arabidopsis, perhaps because tip growth is particularly sensitive to perturbation.
The initiation of tip growth in the root hair bulge is likely to
involve a complex reorganization of cytoskeletal and organelle components to generate a new growth axis. In this view, it is perhaps
surprising that only one gene, RHD2, appears to be
specifically required for the initiation of root hair tip growth. The
hair cells of the rhd2 mutant possess bulges of the proper
size and location, but there is no subsequent hair elongation
(Schiefelbein and Somerville, 1990
).
Several loci are required for tip growth to proceed properly in
Arabidopsis root hairs, including CAN OF WORMS1
(COW1), RHD3, RHD4, TIP1,
and WAVY (Schiefelbein and Somerville, 1990
; Marks and Esch,
1992
; Schiefelbein et al., 1993
; Grierson et al., 1997
; Ryan et al.,
1998
; Galway et al., 1999
). Mutations in these loci alter the
morphology of the hairs, generating swollen, branched, wavy, or
otherwise defective shapes, suggesting that these loci generally
regulate the spatial organization or activity of tip growth processes.
Double mutant analyses suggest a genetic pathway that has COW1, RHD3,
RHD4, and TIP1 acting in parallel (Schiefelbein and Somerville, 1990
;
Grierson et al., 1997
). One of the genes in this group,
RHD3, has been cloned and encodes a novel GTP-binding protein that appears to influence vacuole biogenesis, illustrating the
importance of this process during hair cell enlargement (Galway et al.,
1997
; Wang et al., 1997
).
Duration of Tip Growth
What determines the duration of tip growth, and hence, the length
of root hairs? The presence of significantly shorter or longer root
hairs in hormone-related mutants indicates that auxin and ethylene play
an important role in this process. Mutations in the AXR1,
AUX1, ETR1, and EIN2 loci cause hairs
to be shorter than normal, but to retain their normal morphology (Pitts
et al., 1998
). On the other hand, the eto1 and
phyB mutants generate longer hairs than the wild type (Reed
et al., 1993
; Pitts et al., 1998
), and treatment of seedlings with the
synthetic auxin 2,4-D or ACC also generates longer root hairs (Pitts et
al., 1998
). Together, these findings suggest that auxin and ethylene
are, in part, responsible for determining the extent of root hair tip
growth under laboratory growth conditions.
| |
CONCLUDING REMARKS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A general feature highlighted by these studies is the inherent
plasticity or flexibility in the development of root epidermal cells.
There are now numerous examples whereby epidermal cells that embark on
one differentiation program can switch to the alternate program upon a
change in their position or in response to external factors. This
includes the effect of laser ablation (Berger et al., 1998a
) or ACC
treatment (Tanimoto et al., 1995
; Masucci and Schiefelbein, 1996
) on
root epidermal cell differentiation. Furthermore, the extent of root
hair morphogenesis can be influenced by ethylene or auxin (Pitts et
al., 1998
). It is tempting to speculate that plasticity of this sort
may be important to ensure proper root hair production and hair length
under a variety of environmental conditions.
Although not emphasized in this review, another general point that has
emerged is the high degree of genetic overlap between root hair cell
differentiation and other developmental processes. This is most
striking when one considers the multiple roles of the cell
specification genes. The TTG, WER, and
GL2 genes are each required for proper specification of
epidermal cells in the hypocotyl as well as the root, and in each
organ, an analogous position-dependent pattern of epidermal cell types
is generated (Berger et al., 1998c
; Hung et al., 1998
). Furthermore,
the TTG and GL2 genes (but not WER)
also are required to specify trichomes (leaf hairs) in the shoot
epidermis and seed coat mucilage production in the developing seed
(Larkin et al., 1997
). Genetic overlap is not limited to specification
genes. The RHD3 gene is expressed throughout the plant and
is required for proper expansion of most, if not all, cells (Wang et
al., 1997
). Likewise, the tip1 mutation affects cell growth
in all parts of the plant, including pollen tubes (Schiefelbein et al.,
1993
; Ryan et al., 1998
). This general theme supports the view that the
study of root hair cell differentiation is likely to uncover
developmental mechanisms that are not unique to the root hair cell
type, but are generally employed by plant cells to accomplish the
fundamental processes of specification and morphogenesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I thank the members of my laboratory and colleagues in the root development community (including Christine Bernhardt, Liam Dolan, Yan Lin, Alan Lloyd, David Marks, Myeong Min-Lee, Ben Scheres, Takuji Wada, and Amanda Walker) for their helpful discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received August 7, 2000; accepted September 19, 2000.
* E-mail schiefel{at}umich.edu; fax 734-647-0884.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Segal, T. Kushnir, Y. Mualem, and U. Shani Water Uptake and Hydraulics of the Root Hair Rhizosphere Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2008; 7(3): 1027 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Leblanc, H. Renault, J. Lecourt, P. Etienne, C. Deleu, and E. Le Deunff Elongation Changes of Exploratory and Root Hair Systems Induced by Aminocyclopropane Carboxylic Acid and Aminoethoxyvinylglycine Affect Nitrate Uptake and BnNrt2.1 and BnNrt1.1 Transporter Gene Expression in Oilseed Rape Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1928 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Stenzel, T. Ischebeck, S. Konig, A. Holubowska, M. Sporysz, B. Hause, and I. Heilmann The Type B Phosphatidylinositol-4-Phosphate 5-Kinase 3 Is Essential for Root Hair Formation in Arabidopsis thaliana PLANT CELL, January 1, 2008; 20(1): 124 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cho, S. H. Lee, and H.-T. Cho P-Glycoprotein4 Displays Auxin Efflux Transporter-Like Action in Arabidopsis Root Hair Cells and Tobacco Cells PLANT CELL, December 1, 2007; 19(12): 3930 - 3943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Kramer, N. L. Frazer, and T. I. Baskin Measurement of diffusion within the cell wall in living roots of Arabidopsis thaliana J. Exp. Bot., August 28, 2007; (2007) erm155v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Pislariu and R. Dickstein An IRE-Like AGC Kinase Gene, MtIRE, Has Unique Expression in the Invasion Zone of Developing Root Nodules in Medicago truncatula Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 682 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Lee and H.-T. Cho PINOID Positively Regulates Auxin Efflux in Arabidopsis Root Hair Cells and Tobacco Cells PLANT CELL, July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1604 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kwasniewski and I. Szarejko Molecular Cloning and Characterization of beta-Expansin Gene Related to Root Hair Formation in Barley Plant Physiology, July 1, 2006; 141(3): 1149 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhu, L. Gan, Z. Shen, and K. Xia Interactions between jasmonates and ethylene in the regulation of root hair development in Arabidopsis J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(6): 1299 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-J. Wen, F. Hochholdinger, M. Sauer, W. Bruce, and P. S. Schnable The roothairless1 Gene of Maize Encodes a Homolog of sec3, Which Is Involved in Polar Exocytosis Plant Physiology, July 1, 2005; 138(3): 1637 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. HE, Z. MA, K. M. BROWN, and J. P. LYNCH Assessment of Inequality of Root Hair Density in Arabidopsis thaliana using the Gini Coefficient: a Close Look at the Effect of Phosphorus and its Interaction with Ethylene Ann. Bot., January 2, 2005; 95(2): 287 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cruz-Ramirez, J. Lopez-Bucio, G. Ramirez-Pimentel, A. Zurita-Silva, L. Sanchez-Calderon, E. Ramirez-Chavez, E. Gonzalez-Ortega, and L. Herrera-Estrella The xipotl Mutant of Arabidopsis Reveals a Critical Role for Phospholipid Metabolism in Root System Development and Epidermal Cell Integrity PLANT CELL, August 1, 2004; 16(8): 2020 - 2034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Diet, S. Brunner, and C. Ringli The enl Mutants Enhance the lrx1 Root Hair Mutant Phenotype of Arabidopsis thaliana Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2004; 45(6): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goormachtig, W. Capoen, E. K. James, and M. Holsters Switch from intracellular to intercellular invasion during water stress-tolerant legume nodulation PNAS, April 20, 2004; 101(16): 6303 - 6308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Muller and W. Schmidt Environmentally Induced Plasticity of Root Hair Development in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, January 1, 2004; 134(1): 409 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Zhang, J. P. Lynch, and K. M. Brown Ethylene and phosphorus availability have interacting yet distinct effects on root hair development J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2003; 54(391): 2351 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ohashi, A. Oka, R. Rodrigues-Pousada, M. Possenti, I. Ruberti, G. Morelli, and T. Aoyama Modulation of Phospholipid Signaling by GLABRA2 in Root-Hair Pattern Formation Science, May 30, 2003; 300(5624): 1427 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-T. Cho and D. J. Cosgrove Regulation of Root Hair Initiation and Expansin Gene Expression in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, December 1, 2002; 14(12): 3237 - 3253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rahman, S. Hosokawa, Y. Oono, T. Amakawa, N. Goto, and S. Tsurumi Auxin and Ethylene Response Interactions during Arabidopsis Root Hair Development Dissected by Auxin Influx Modulators Plant Physiology, December 1, 2002; 130(4): 1908 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Q. Ling, P. Bauer, Z. Bereczky, B. Keller, and M. Ganal The tomato fer gene encoding a bHLH protein controls iron-uptake responses in roots PNAS, October 15, 2002; 99(21): 13938 - 13943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ringli, N. Baumberger, A. Diet, B. Frey, and B. Keller ACTIN2 Is Essential for Bulge Site Selection and Tip Growth during Root Hair Development of Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2002; 129(4): 1464 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Johnson, B. Kolevski, and D. R. Smyth TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2, a Trichome and Seed Coat Development Gene of Arabidopsis, Encodes a WRKY Transcription Factor PLANT CELL, June 1, 2002; 14(6): 1359 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shi and J.-K. Zhu SOS4, A Pyridoxal Kinase Gene, Is Required for Root Hair Development in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, June 1, 2002; 129(2): 585 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Golz and A. Hudson Signalling in Plant Lateral Organ Development PLANT CELL, May 1, 2002; 14(90001): S277 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|