|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, January 2001, Vol. 125, pp. 180-188
UPDATE ON GENETIC ENGINEERING
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
GLYCINEBETAINE (GB) AS A DETERMINANT OF STRESS TOLERANCE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GB is a zwitterionic, fully
N-methyl-substituted derivative of Gly that is found in a
large variety of microorganisms, higher plants, and animals (Rhodes and
Hanson, 1993
). At high concentrations, GB does not interfere with
cytoplasmic functions and it efficiently stabilizes the structure and
function of many macromolecules. Thus, it belongs to a group of
compounds that are known collectively as compatible solutes.
GB appears to be a critical determinant of stress tolerance in plants.
It is an extremely efficient compatible solute (Le Rudulier et al.,
1984
) and its presence is strongly associated with the growth of plants
in dry and/or saline environments (Rhodes and Hanson, 1993
). The
accumulation of GB is induced under stress conditions (Gorham, 1995
),
and the level of GB is correlated with the degree of enhanced tolerance
to stress (Saneoka et al., 1995
). Exogenous application of GB improves
the growth and survival of a wide variety of plants under various
stress conditions (Allard et al., 1998
; Hayashi et al., 1998
).
Furthermore, GB is much more effective than other compatible solutes in
the stabilization in vitro of the quaternary structure of enzymes and
complex proteins, as well as the highly ordered state of membranes, at
high concentrations of salts and extreme temperatures (Gorham, 1995
;
Papageorgiou and Murata, 1995
). These properties of GB were deduced for
the most part from studies based on comparative physiology and
genetics, as well as from experiments in vitro. However, such studies
have in fact provided only circumstantial evidence for the important role in vivo of GB in the stress tolerance of plants.
A full understanding of the role of GB requires more than
circumstantial evidence, and genetic engineering of unicellular cyanobacteria has provided a way for us to examine the physiological significance and the modes of action in vivo of this
compatible/protective solute in the stress tolerance of photosynthetic
organisms (Deshnium et al., 1995
; Nomura et al., 1995
). Similar
transgenic approaches have proved fruitful in higher plants such as
Arabidopsis, rice (Oryza sativa), and tobacco
(Nicotiana tabacum), none of which normally synthesizes GB
(Hayashi and Murata, 1998
; Sakamoto and Murata, 2000
). The aim of this
Update is to summarize recent progress in experiments with
transgenic phototrophs that has advanced our understanding on the role
in vivo of GB in stress tolerance. Aspects of the physiology,
biochemistry and genetics of the synthesis, and properties of GB have
been covered elsewhere (Rhodes and Hanson, 1993
; Gorham, 1995
; McNeil
et al., 1999
).
| |
CHOLINE OXIDASE IS A CONVENIENT ENZYME FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING OF THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF GB |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All known pathways for the synthesis of GB start with choline and
proceed through reactions that involve one or two enzymes for the
oxidation of choline to GB (Hayashi and Murata, 1998
). The one-enzyme
reaction is catalyzed by choline oxidase (COD) in soil bacteria
Arthrobacter globiformis and Arthrobacter
pascens. The two-enzyme reaction is by a ferredoxin-dependent
choline monooxygenase (CMO) and an NAD+-dependent
betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) in the chloroplasts of higher
plants. In mammalian cells and in microorganisms such as
Escherichia coli, another two-enzyme reaction is catalyzed by an NAD+-dependent choline dehydrogenase (CDH)
and BADH.
Researchers had to choose one of the three distinct pathways to GB as the most suitable target for the genetic manipulations that would introduce a GB-biosynthetic pathway into non-GB-accumulating organisms. The COD pathway clearly has an advantage over the CDH/BADH and CMO/BADH pathways because a single transformation with the relevant gene should introduce the pathway from choline to GB, and COD does not require any cofactors for the catalysis. In fact, in studies of cyanobacteria and various plants, genetic engineering with the codA and cox genes, which encode COD of A. globiformis and A. pascens, respectively, has proved most successful, as indicated in Table I. Table I also shows that all the enzymes mentioned above have been expressed transgenically and, for the most part, constitutively in photosynthetic organisms that do not normally accumulate GB.
|
A general consequence of such transformation, which was not examined in all cases, is that the transgenic production of GB enhances stress tolerance to a moderate to significant extent, even though the accumulation of GB is osmotically insignificant (Table II). Such transgenic systems provide valuable models for the functional dissection of the role of GB in stress tolerance. In the following sections, we shall summarize the emerging view of how GB contributes in vivo to acclimation to a stressful environment.
|
| |
TRANSGENIC CYANOBACTERIA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Accumulation of GB enhances the tolerance to high concentrations
of NaCl of certain bacteria, e.g. E. coli (Le Rudulier et al., 1984
). Furthermore, unicellular phototrophs can also acquire salt
tolerance if transgenically produced GB accumulates in such cells,
which do not normally produce this compatible solute. For example,
Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 (hereafter,
Synechococcus) is a salt-sensitive, freshwater
cyanobacterium that does not normally produce GB. As an initial step
toward elucidation of the physiological importance in vivo of GB in the
stress tolerance of photosynthetic organisms, members of two research
groups almost simultaneously transformed this cyanobacterium with genes
that are involved in the biosynthesis of this compatible solute
(Deshnium et al., 1995
; Nomura et al., 1995
).
Transformation with the codA Gene Enhances Tolerance to High-Salt and Low-Temperature Stress
Synechococcus actively and efficiently incorporates and
integrates exogenous DNA into its genome by homologous recombination. We introduced the codA gene for COD from A. globiformis, under the control of a constitutively active
promoter, into the genome of the above-mentioned cyanobacterium
(Deshnium et al., 1995
). The resultant cells accumulated GB at levels
as high as 80 mM when choline was supplied
exogenously and the cells exhibited enhanced tolerance to salt stress,
as evaluated in terms of growth, the accumulation of chlorophyll, and
photosynthetic activity (Table II). They also exhibited enhanced
tolerance to low-temperature stress (Table II; Deshnium et al.,
1997
). The phase transition of plasma membranes from the
liquid-crystalline state to the gel state simultaneously shifted toward
lower temperatures in the transgenic strain. This phenomenon
might be expected to be important to the enhanced tolerance of
the cyanobacterium to low temperatures because the phase transition is
accompanied with the loss of numerous functions of the membranes
(Nishida and Murata, 1996
).
Transformation with the bet Operon of E. coli Enhances Tolerance to Salt Stress
Nomura et al. (1995)
took advantage of a prokaryotic gene
expression system and transformed Synechococcus with a
shuttle plasmid that carried the bet operon from E. coli. The operon contains four genes: the betA and
betB genes for CDH and BADH, respectively; and the
betI and betT genes that encode a putative
regulatory protein and a protein that is involved in the transport of
choline, respectively. The transgenic cyanobacterial cells accumulated GB at about 50 mM and contained increased levels
of C-phycocyanin in response to salt stress. The activities of
photosystems I and II exhibited enhanced stability, and the cells grew
better than control cells under salt stress (Table II). Nomura et al.
(1998)
also suggested that Rubisco might be a major target of damage by
salt stress and that GB might protect this enzyme from salt-induced inactivation in the transgenic cells.
| |
TRANSGENIC ARABIDOPSIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our successful genetic engineering of Synechococcus
inevitably led us to apply the same strategy to higher plants that do not produce GB. Transformation of Arabidopsis with the codA
gene from A. globiformis resulted in the accumulation of GB
in various organs of transformed plants (Hayashi et al., 1997
), and we
were eager to examine the impacts of the accumulation of GB on the stress physiology of the transgenic plants at the cellular and the
whole-plant level.
Transformation with the codA Gene Enhances Tolerance to Various Kinds of Stress at Various Stages of Development
Hayashi et al. (1997)
produced Arabidopsis (ecotype Wassilewskija)
plants that overexpressed COD under the control of the constitutively
active 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus. The codA
gene was preceded by a sequence that encoded the transit peptide of the
small subunit of Rubisco of tobacco. The maximum levels of GB
accumulated were 1.2 µmol g
1 fresh weight and
18 µmol g
1 dry weight in shoots and mature
seeds, respectively. Recent analysis suggests that considerable amounts
of the GB is localized exclusively in the chloroplasts in the leaves
(Sakamoto et al., 2000
).
Table II summarizes the physiological responses to various stresses of
transgenic Arabidopsis at various stages of development. The most
striking effects of transformation were changes in the tolerance of
high-salt stress. Transgenic Arabidopsis was tolerant to high-salt
conditions during the germination of seeds, and the growth and survival
of seedlings and mature plants under such conditions were markedly
enhanced (Fig. 1; Hayashi et al.,
1997
, 1998
). The transgenic plants were also tolerant to temperature stress over a broad range of temperatures. The transformation significantly enhanced tolerance to non-freezing low temperatures during the imbibition and germination of seeds, as indicated by higher
frequencies and rates of germination than those of wild-type seeds
(Alia et al., 1998a
). Seedlings of transgenic plants had an increased
biomass under low-temperature stress and mature plants were less
susceptible to chilling-induced chlorotic damage (Hayashi et al., 1997
;
Alia et al., 1998a
). The accumulation of GB also rendered the
transgenic plants more tolerant to high-temperature stress (Alia et
al., 1998b
). Seeds of transgenic plants exhibited considerable
tolerance to high temperatures during both imbibition and germination.
Moreover, enhanced tolerance to high temperatures was not confined to
the initial stages of development, as indicated by the accelerated
growth and enhanced survival after heat treatment of seedlings of
transgenic plants. One particularly interesting phenomenon, reported by
Alia et al. (1998b)
, was that the extent of induction of a
chloroplast-specific heat shock protein was lower at high temperatures
in the transgenic plants than in the wild-type plants, indicating that
GB might have reduced the effects of heat shock. At the other end of
the temperature range, the accumulation of GB dramatically improved the
survival of mature plants at freezing temperatures (Sakamoto et al.,
2000
). Several cold-regulated genes (cor6.6,
cor15a, cor47, and cor78), which have
been implicated in the development of freezing tolerance (Jaglo-Ottosen
et al., 1998
), seemed not to be responsible for the enhanced tolerance
to freezing because there were no significant differences in the levels
of their expression between wild-type and transgenic plants (Sakamoto
et al., 2000
).
|
We previously demonstrated that, in vitro, GB protects the
photosynthetic machinery against salt and heat stress (Papageorgiou and
Murata, 1995
). The photochemical activity of photosystem II (PSII) in
vivo, which we monitored in terms of changes in the fluorescence of
chlorophyll a in intact leaves, was inhibited to a
significantly lower extent in the transgenic plants than in wild-type
plants under various types of stress, such as high concentrations of
NaCl (Hayashi et al., 1997
), low temperatures (Hayashi et al., 1997
),
and freezing temperatures (Sakamoto et al., 2000
). The transformation
also enhanced the tolerance to high-intensity light (Alia et al.,
1999
). It seems likely that this effect resulted from stimulation by
GB, in chloroplasts, of the recovery of the damaged PSII complex,
rather than from protection of the PSII complex against photo-induced
damage (Alia et al., 1999
).
Does Transformation with the codA Gene Have Harmful Effects?
Metabolic engineering of the synthesis of certain compatible
solutes, such as sorbitol, has pleiotropic effects, for example necrosis and the development of growth defects, which are mostly due to
disturbances in endogenous pathways of primary metabolism (Sheveleva et
al., 1998
). We were concerned that the overexpressed COD might compete
for choline with the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of
phosphatidylcholine, a major component of membrane lipids. In fact, we
found no significant differences in the respective levels of choline
and phosphatidylcholine between transgenic and wild-type plants
(Hayashi et al., 1997
; Alia et al., 1999
). Another concern was that COD
might generate high levels of
H2O2 as a by-product of the
synthesis of GB. The level of
H2O2 increased only
modestly (1.5- to 2.0-fold) in transgenic plants under both stress and non-stress conditions, as compared with levels in non-transgenic plants
(Alia et al., 1999
). Simultaneously with the slight increase in the
level of H2O2, we observed
increased activation of ascorbate peroxidase and catalase, both of
which detoxify H2O2 by
converting it to water, in transformed plants as compared with
wild-type plants (Alia et al., 1999
). The
H2O2 generated by choline
oxidase seemed to induce the expression of these scavenging enzymes,
with the resultant maintenance of intracellular
H2O2 at a non-hazardous level.
Transformation with the cox Gene from A. pascens
The demonstration of the physiological impact of the
overexpression of COD in chloroplasts was followed by an effort to
determine the consequences of the overexpression of COD in a different
subcellular compartment. Huang et al. (2000)
transformed Arabidopsis
(ecotype RLD) with the gene for COD, cox, from
another soil bacterium, A. pascens. The accumulation of GB
(maximum level, 18.6 µmol g
1 dry weight),
which resulted from the expression of COD in the cytosol, was similar
to that in the plants that overexpressed the enzyme in their
chloroplasts (Table I). The level of GB increased still further when
choline was supplied exogenously, indicating that the availability of
substrate might limit the synthesis of GB when high-level accumulation
of GB, similar to that in natural producers of GB, is the goal in
non-accumulating species. In relative terms, the transgenic plants
tolerated high-salt, drought, and freezing stress only moderately well
(Table II). The marked differences between the results of
transformation in this and the aforementioned studies indicate that
differences in subcellular targeting of the biosynthetic enzyme might
significantly affect the physiological impact of the accumulation of GB
in intact plants.
| |
TRANSGENIC RICE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rice is not only a staple food worldwide but it is also an
excellent model monocotyledonous plant. Rice plants are sensitive to
various environmental stresses and they do not synthesize GB. The
relative simplicity of systems for the transformation of rice and the
refinement of systems for the expression of transgenes have enabled us
to endow this important monocot with the ability to produce GB. Two
research groups have succeeded in generating transformed rice that
synthesizes GB, exploiting biosynthetic enzymes in different
subcellular compartments (Sakamoto et al., 1998
; Takabe et al., 1998
),
as summarized below.
Transformation with the codA Gene Enhances Salt and Cold Tolerance
We transformed the japonica variety of rice with two
chimeric constructs in which the codA gene was under
control of the 35S promoter and which included an intron that
originated in rice to enhance gene expression. One construct encoded
COD with a signal for targeting to the chloroplasts, whereas the other
lacked such a signal sequence, allowing COD to remain in the cytosol
(Sakamoto et al., 1998
). This study has been, to our knowledge, the
only attempt to date to examine the effects of the subcellular
compartmentalization of GB synthesis on stress tolerance of plants. The
level of GB in leaves was 1 µmol g
1 fresh
weight with the first construct and 3 to 5 µmol
g
1 fresh weight with the second. The targeting
of COD to the chloroplasts provided more effective protection of the
PSII complex under high-salt and low-temperature conditions, suggesting
that the subcellular localization of the synthesis of GB might be of
crucial importance in the protection of the photosynthetic machinery
against high-salt and cold stress. However, both types of transgenic
rice grew better than wild-type plants during the recovery from salt
stress (Table II).
Transformation with a Modified betA Gene Enhances Tolerance to High-Salt and Drought Stress
The CDH of E. coli catalyzes both the first and second
reactions that convert choline to GB, although the latter reaction is
less efficient than the former. Takabe et al. (1998)
transformed japonica rice with the betA gene plus a signal for targeting
to the mitochondria after modifications that eliminated possible polyadenylation signals, palindromic structures, and rarely used codons
in rice, all of which might be expected to prevent the efficient
expression of the sequence of interest. Transgenic plants that produced
CDH accumulated betaine at levels as high as 5 and 1.2 µmol
g
1 fresh weight in leaves and roots,
respectively. By contrast, neither the native gene nor the modified
gene without the targeting signal caused the accumulation of GB in
transgenic plants, results that indicate that these genes were not
efficiently expressed or, if they were expressed, that an appropriate
cofactor (NAD+) for the catalytic reaction was
not available in the cytosol. Transgenic plants that accumulated GB
survived better than control plants during the recovery from salt and
drought stress (Table II). Furthermore, the photosynthetic machinery
was more tolerant in transgenic plants than in wild-type plants to salt stress.
| |
TRANSGENIC TOBACCO |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tobacco has been widely used as a model plant in efforts to
identify genes responsible for stress tolerance and to improve the
performance of plants under stress conditions. Genes for all the
enzymes involved in the synthesis of GB from choline have been
individually manipulated in tobacco (Lilius et al., 1996
; Nuccio et al., 1998
; Holmström et al., 2000
; Huang et al., 2000
). Thus, tobacco is the most intensively studied plant in terms of the
possibility of engineering the synthesis of GB in a non-accumulator (see Table I). The various studies revealed the inefficient expression of transgenes and the remarkably low levels of accumulation of GB, as
compared to those engineered in other species.
Transgenic tobacco expressing the betA gene from E. coli tolerated high-salt conditions, as determined by monitoring
growth and biomass production (Table II; Lilius et al., 1996
). However, the production of GB has not yet been confirmed in such transgenic tobacco. Therefore, the contribution of GB to the salt-tolerant phenotype of the transgenic plants remains to be clarified.
Another research group also introduced into tobacco the betA
gene that had been modified so as to inactivate a possible poly(A) signal in the structural gene (Holmström et al., 2000
). The
resultant transgenic tobacco accumulated GB at an appreciable level,
which was still considerably lower than that in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice (Table I). Transgenic tobacco that expressed the modified betA gene enhanced the biomass production under salt stress
and the tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery to photoinhibition under salt and chilling stress (Table II). When this transgenic tobacco
was crossed with transgenic tobacco that had been transformed to
synthesize BADH, the resultant progeny produced both CDH and BADH, and
accumulated nearly 2-fold higher levels of GB than transgenic plants
with CDH alone (Holmström et al., 2000
). However, it does not
seem likely that the co-existence of CDH and BADH further improved the
stress tolerance.
The potential for production of GB in tobacco by genetic engineering of
the synthesis of CMO alone was examined by overexpressing the
corresponding cDNA from spinach because tobacco has low BADH activity,
although biochemical and molecular properties of such BADH have not
been well characterized (Nuccio et al., 1998
). Constitutive production
and targeting to the chloroplasts of functional CMO resulted in very
low levels of accumulation of GB in the transgenic plants (Table I)
and, consequently, no change in phenotype was expected or recognized
with respect to salt tolerance.
Transgenic tobacco expressing COD was generated by transformation with
the same cox construct as had been used for transformation of Arabidopsis (Huang et al., 2000
). While a few lines accumulated appreciable levels of GB (Table I), the vast majority of transgenic plants contained extremely low levels of COD and GB, if any. The phenotype of such transgenic lines strongly suggests the considerable limitations to the use of tobacco for genetic exploitation of the
transgenic synthesis of GB.
| |
MECHANISMS OF STRESS TOLERANCE: THE ROLE OF GB IN VIVO |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Are the Protective Effects of GB Related to Osmotic Regulation?
Physiological studies of the functions of compatible solutes
suggest that GB in the cell is most likely to act by reversing the
osmotic imbalance between the intracellular and the extracellular environment that is caused by various types of stress. Such reversal can occur only when GB accumulates at high levels, such as the 400 µmol g
1 dry weight recorded in certain
species under stress conditions (Rhodes and Hanson, 1993
). By contrast,
transgenic plants exhibit moderately or significantly enhanced stress
tolerance even though levels of GB are low (up to 5 µmol
g
1 fresh weight; Table I). Such low levels are
insignificant in the context of osmoregulation. The concentrations of
GB in transgenic Synechococcus (50-80
mM) were also insufficient to account osmotically for the acquired tolerance to as much as 400 mM
NaCl. Moreover, this is not an isolated phenomenon because enhanced
protection against stress has been observed in transgenic plants that
produce low levels of other compatible solutes, such as mannitol
(maximum level, 6 µmol g
1 fresh weight;
Tarczynski et al., 1993
) and trehalose (maximum level, 9 µmol
g
1 dry weight; Holmström et al., 1996
).
Taken together, these studies suggest that GB has a protective
rather than an osmotic effect in vivo, and they lead us to question the
established view of GB as an osmoregulator exclusively.
Does GB Stabilize Complex Proteins and Membranes in Vivo?
The protective effects of GB on macromolecules, such as complex
proteins and membranes, which have been well demonstrated in vitro, are
clearly recognizable in vivo also. Under various stress conditions, GB
protects the PSII complex from photo-induced inactivation in transgenic
cells of Synechococcus and in plants (Table II). The
protection by GB of the photosynthetic machinery against photo-induced
damage can be attributed to acceleration of the recovery of the PSII
complex from such damage (Deshnium et al., 1997
; Alia et al., 1999
;
Holmström et al., 2000
).
Evidence that membranes are targets of the action of GB in vivo has
been obtained from Synechococcus cells that have been transformed with the codA gene (Deshnium et al., 1997
). In
the transgenic strain, there is a downward shift in the temperature at
which the transition from the liquid-crystalline state to the phase-separated state occurs in the lipid phase of the plasma membrane.
The lowering of the temperature of the phase transition is a critical
mechanism in the enhancement of tolerance to low temperatures (Nishida
and Murata, 1996
). The unsaturation of fatty acids in membrane lipids
has also been characterized well as a mechanism of acclimation that
leads to low-temperature tolerance (Nishida and Murata, 1996
). However,
GB does not affect the unsaturation of fatty acids in
Synechococcus (Deshnium et al., 1997
) or in Arabidopsis
(Alia et al., 1999
), and this observation suggests that the enhancement
of low-temperature tolerance by GB is due to the action in vivo of GB itself.
A role of GB in protecting membrane integrity was inferred from the
enhanced tolerance to temperature stress that was observed during
imbibition of seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis (Alia et al., 1998a
,
1998b
; Table II). Accumulated GB might prevent the destructive
reorganization of membrane lipids when dry seeds are welted. Such
reorganization often occurs when seeds are allowed to imbibe water at
extreme temperatures. The results obtained from studies of transgenic
plants and microorganisms reflect those obtained in a number of studies
in vitro, with the exception that much higher concentrations of GB are
required in vitro for reproduction of the protective effects of GB.
This issue of concentrations remains to be resolved.
Does GB Protect the Transcriptional and Translational Machinery?
The fact that transgenic plants exhibited tolerance to various
kinds of abiotic stress (notably Arabidopsis; Table II) suggests that
GB might contribute to the maintenance of cellular functions of
fundamental importance under stress conditions. There is some evidence
for the involvement of GB in the protection of the transcriptional and
translational machinery under stress conditions. Rajendrakumar et al.
(1997)
reported that GB decreases the melting temperature in vitro of
double-stranded DNA. Such a destabilizing effect on DNA might
facilitate replication and transcription in vivo in a high-salt
environment. Eventually, Allard et al. (1998)
observed that exogenous
application of GB to wheat seedlings induced the expression of
cold-inducible genes, suggesting that GB has an ability to enhance the
transcription in vivo of genes that are involved in stress tolerance.
Processes involved in the gene expression are highly susceptible to
various kinds of stress such as high concentrations of salt and extreme
temperatures. GroEL, a chaperonin in E. coli, is
effective in vivo in maintaining the function of the transcriptional and translational machinery by interacting with components of the
machinery (Houry et al., 1999
). Bourot et al. (2000)
have recently
demonstrated that GB behaves in vivo like the chaperonin. This seems to
suggest that GB may stabilize the transcriptional and translational
machinery for the efficient expression of genes under stress
conditions. One mechanism that has been proposed as an explanation for
the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis to high-intensity light is that
GB might accelerate protein synthesis de novo: the treatment with
lincomycin, an inhibitor of protein synthesis in chloroplasts,
diminishes the protective effect of GB (Alia et al., 1999
).
How Important Is the Subcellular Localization of GB?
The subcellular localization of GB and the site of its
biosynthesis seem to be crucial for efficient protection by GB from the
effect of stress. The presence of enzymes that can catalyze the
synthesis of GB in chloroplasts has been unequivocally demonstrated in
Chenopodiaceae, but the occurrence of these enzymes in compartments other than chloroplasts cannot yet be ruled out in other plant families, such as Gramineae (McNeil et al., 1999
). The accumulation of
GB in chloroplasts has been demonstrated convincingly in natural accumulators of GB (McNeil et al., 1999
), and such accumulation also
seems to occur in transgenic plants when the appropriate enzyme is
targeted to the chloroplasts (Sakamoto et al., 2000
). Overexpression of
COD in the chloroplasts had a more significant impact on the stress
tolerance of transgenic plants than overproduction in the cytosol
(Hayashi et al., 1997
; Huang et al., 2000
). For efficient protection of
the photosynthetic machinery, it seems to be important to target the
biosynthetic enzyme(s) to the chloroplasts (Sakamoto et al., 1998
).
From the available evidence, it seems reasonable to postulate that, in
vivo, GB protects the physiological and metabolic activities of
chloroplasts, in particular the photosynthetic machinery, by
stabilizing the quaternary structures and functions of protein
complexes such as the PSII complex. However, targeting of the enzyme
for the biosynthesis of GB to mitochondria and the cytosol also
enhanced the tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery to salt and
chilling stress (Takabe et al., 1998
; Holmström et al., 2000
).
The mechanism by which GB, synthesized in mitochondria or the cytosol,
has a protective effect on the photosynthetic machinery remains to be elucidated.
| |
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS TO AGRICULTURE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic engineering of the synthesis of GB and studies of the
responses of transgenic plants to environmental stress have begun to
provide some insight into the roles and functions in vivo of GB and the
molecular mechanisms in stress tolerance. At the same time, the
possibility has emerged that the same approaches might be used to
improve the stress tolerance of agronomically important crops. From a
biotechnological perspective, the initial focus has been on the further
development of the capacity for synthesis of GB. With sophisticated
control of the expression of transferred genes and enhancement of the
availability of the substrate in a specific subcellular compartment, it
may be possible to generate plants that produce elevated levels of GB
and that are more tolerant than available cultivars to various stresses in the agricultural environment. However, such an approach might not be
applicable to all crop species because the potential for the transgenic
approach is limited in some species, e.g. tobacco (Huang et al., 2000
).
A second and extremely attractive approach is a combination of
different strategies that are each, individually, effective in the
enhancement of stress tolerance. Targets for this approach include
genes involved in the biosynthesis of compatible solutes other than GB
(Tarczynski et al., 1993
; Holmström et al., 1996
) and regulatory
proteins, such as a stress-inducible transcription factor
(Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998
). After we have engineered the
synthesis of GB, subsequent introduction of other genes that have been
implicated in stress tolerance might have a significant impact on
efforts aimed at increasing the stress tolerance of agriculturally
important plants.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received August 9, 2000; accepted August 29, 2000.
1 This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (no. 08102011) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan. It was also supported by the fund from the Cooperative Research Program of the National Institute for Basic Biology (Japan) for Studies of the Molecular Mechanisms of Stress Tolerance.
* Corresponding author; e-mail murata{at}nibb.ac.jp; fax 81-564-4866.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Ohnishi and N. Murata Glycinebetaine Counteracts the Inhibitory Effects of Salt Stress on the Degradation and Synthesis of D1 Protein during Photoinhibition in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 758 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Su, R. Hirji, L. Zhang, C. He, G. Selvaraj, and R. Wu Evaluation of the stress-inducible production of choline oxidase in transgenic rice as a strategy for producing the stress-protectant glycine betaine J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(5): 1129 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Young, R. W. Wilen, and P. C. Bonham-Smith High temperature stress of Brassica napus during flowering reduces micro- and megagametophyte fertility, induces fruit abortion, and disrupts seed production J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2004; 55(396): 485 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rontein, D. Rhodes, and A. D. Hanson Evidence from Engineering that Decarboxylation of Free Serine is the Major Source of Ethanolamine Moieties in Plants Plant Cell Physiol., November 15, 2003; 44(11): 1185 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Raman and B. Rathinasabapathi {beta}-Alanine N-Methyltransferase of Limonium latifolium. cDNA Cloning and Functional Expression of a Novel N-Methyltransferase Implicated in the Synthesis of the Osmoprotectant {beta}-Alanine Betaine Plant Physiology, July 1, 2003; 132(3): 1642 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Mou, X. Wang, Z. Fu, Y. Dai, C. Han, J. Ouyang, F. Bao, Y. Hu, and J. Li Silencing of Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase Results in Temperature-Sensitive Male Sterility and Salt Hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, September 1, 2002; 14(9): 2031 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. F. Charron, G. Breton, J. Danyluk, I. Muzac, R. K. Ibrahim, and F. Sarhan Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of a Cold-Regulated Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase from Wheat Plant Physiology, May 1, 2002; 129(1): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|