Department of Biological and Nutritional Sciences, The University
of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
(R.S.P.); and Department of Agriculture and Food Studies, Seale-Hayne
Faculty, University of Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6NQ, United
Kingdom (M.P.F.)
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The survival and performance of
temperate wild and crop species depends on their ability to tolerate
some degree of freezing. Understanding freezing tolerance creates means
to improve crop performance and helps explain the distribution of wild
species. Current strategies for achieving this understanding focus on
molecular analysis of cold acclimation (Pearce, 1999
; Thomashow, 1999
). However, it is equally important to understand the freezing process itself. This can identify similarities or differences between species
in how they are affected by freezing, and is essential for eventually
differentiating aspects of freezing that the plant does and does not control.
During freezing, substantial amounts of ice accumulate between the
cells, growing at the expense of water drawn from inside the cells and
thus dehydrating them (Pearce, 1988
; Pearce and Ashworth, 1992
). The
cells are killed when their dehydration tolerance is exceeded. It is
clear that this will only happen to a cell or tissue if freezing
reaches that part of the plant. Understanding the spread of freezing
within the plant is one factor helping to explain susceptibility of
different plant parts to freezing damage and may indicate ways of
controlling or avoiding damage.
Different plant organs or tissues may freeze at different temperatures.
This is particularly well known in woody plants and is explained by
different ice nucleation events in different parts of the plant and by
barriers to spread of ice (Burke et al., 1976
; Ashworth, 1996
;
Wisniewski et al., 1997
; Wisniewski and Fuller, 1999
). It is argued
that ice forms in xylem vessels and then spreads to other parts of the
plant through the vessels (Sakai and Larcher, 1987
). The idea of rapid
spread through vessels is a reasonable suggestion. There is direct
evidence for ice propagation through xylem tissue (Kitaura, 1967
).
Although the rate of spread of freezing through stems can be fast, of
the order of 1 to 2 cm s
1 (Single and
Marcellos, 1981
; Sakai and Larcher, 1987
), direct evidence for
nucleation in vessels and spread through vessels is lacking.
In cereals, stem nodes and the base of the roots pose a barrier
to spread of ice, possibly related to xylem structure (Single and
Marcellos, 1981
; Záme
ník et al., 1994
). Proteins
and polysaccharides with antifreeze properties are present in cereal
leaves and the crown, respectively (Olien and Smith, 1981
; Griffith and
Antikainen, 1996
). On the other hand, a comprehensive account of spread
of freezing in cereals is lacking, yet is essential for
understanding the relative roles of any specific features identified.
Our purpose was to use infrared video thermography (IRVT) to obtain a
more comprehensive account of spread of freezing in cereals and to seek
new and informative details.
When supercooled water freezes it causes a release of heat (an
exotherm). Freezing is detected by the consequent rise in temperature. Freezing after even slight supercooling is detectable. The usual method to study freezing has been by attaching thermocouples to parts
of a plant and recording the time and temperature at which exotherms
occur. Though this has provided important information (Burke et al.,
1976
; Sakai and Larcher, 1987
), the approach has limitations: it cannot
identify the site of nucleation of freezing, is not ideal for
identifying the pathway of spread of ice, and gives only partial
information on rates of spread. In addition, thermocouples themselves
may induce freezing (Fuller and Wisniewski, 1999
).
IRVT has recently been used to study freezing (Wisniewski et al.,
1997
). Data obtained using IRVT comprises video images in which false
color indicates the temperature. IRVT provides detailed real-time
images of the surface temperature of plant organs and allows the site
of nucleation and initial spread of freezing to be observed. So far it
has mainly been applied to tender species such as bean, tomato, and
potato, and to woody species such as rhododendron and fruit crops
(Wisniewski et al., 1997
; Carter et al., 1999
; Fuller and Wisniewski,
1999
; Wisniewski and Fuller, 1999
; Workmaster et al., 1999
). These
studies have shown that freezing may occur first on the leaf surface
and that ice enters leaves through stomata, but also that in some woody
species freezing may first occur inside the plant (Wisniewski et al.,
1997
; Wisniewski and Fuller, 1999
). They have also verified the
importance of internal barriers to the spread of freezing (Carter et
al., 1999
; Workmaster et al., 1999
).
IRVT studies have not included hardy herbaceous plants, nor any grasses
or cereals, and have been entirely based on laboratory studies. In a
radiation frost moisture condenses on the plant and freezes, and this
may nucleate freezing in the plant. This is difficult to achieve in the
laboratory, and therefore nucleation is ensured by artificial methods.
For this reason it is important to include field experiments to help
verify the ideas about plant freezing developed on the basis of
laboratory experiments.
Thus we used IRVT to characterize freezing in whole plants of barley
(Hordeum vulgare) and in barley and grass leaves
(Hordeum murinum and Holcus lanatus), mostly in
the laboratory, but also in nature, including determining rates of
spread, spatial distribution, directions of spread, and sequences of
organ freezing, and we drew conclusions about the possible routes of
spread and role of barriers to spread.
 |
RESULTS |
Shoots of cereal plants usually require moisture on their surface
to freeze in laboratory tests at temperatures similar to those at which
they freeze in the field. To verify this in the present experiments
eight well-watered plants in pots, but having dry shoot surfaces, were
cooled to a shoot temperature of
4.0°C. No parts of the plants
froze (data not shown). In addition, when ice or single droplets of
water or of a suspension of ice-nucleation active (INA) bacteria were
placed on leaves, freezing was initiated at the point of application
(below), and not at any other point. Hence for shoot freezing to be
studied in the laboratory, water, ice, or a suspension of INA bacteria
had to be brought into contact with the shoot surface.
Interpretation of the Images
A freezing event is exothermic and therefore its initiation can be
detected as a rise in temperature. When the freezing event has
finished, no more heat is released and the temperature falls. In each
experiment the temperature range covered by the false-color scale (e.g.
Fig. 1) was reset as cooling progressed, to keep the temperature of
unfrozen parts of the plant at the bottom-end of the temperature range,
shown by cold-pink or blue. Thus freezing would be detected by warming,
giving a blue (if the specimen was initially cold-pink) or white color.
With further warming the color would change again, to green, yellow, or
red. Black indicates a temperature below, and pale pink indicates a
temperature above, the set range. It was important to identify the
termination of the freezing event, when all the ice that could form at
that time in the experiment had formed, and when the specimen would
recool. This was seen as a change in color toward the cold-end (blue or cold-pink) of the temperature scale.

View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Sequential freezing of parts of a barley plant
during cooling in a controlled environment chamber showing spread of
ice through the plant, including the first (red arrows) and second
freezing events in a number of leaves (leaves 2-5) and freezing of
roots (black, double-headed arrow), a leaf sheath (s), and secondary
tiller (t). IRVT images are shown in time order from before the plant
began to freeze (a) to when extensive freezing had occurred
(j). k is a visible light image taken when freezing was complete.
Leaves are numbered from the second to the fifth leaf to emerge (the
first leaf was removed before the test). The plant was removed from
soil and placed flat on a cork surface and exposed to subzero cooling.
The stars in a and k mark two pins holding down a strip of plastic that
gently held leaf 3 in contact with ice (indicated by a single-headed
black arrow) to initiate freezing. Black bar (in a) = 1 cm. The
color scale table (bottom right) indicates the temperature scale for
each figure. Leaf 3 froze first and showed two freezing events. The
warming of leaf 3 in b (red arrow) compared with in a indicates
freezing. The leaf then cooled (c-e). It warmed again (f), indicating
a second freezing event, and reached a higher temperature than in the
first freezing event (compare g and h with b), and then cooled again
(i). Roots froze second (red arrow in c). Leaf 2 froze next (red arrow
indicates warming of the leaf in d) and also showed two freezing
events: it cooled (e) and then warmed again (starting in f and
continuing in g and h), finally cooling again. The sheath of leaf 2 (s)
also froze (second freezing event shown in h-j). Leaf 4 froze next,
ice spreading up the leaf (red arrow in f; the second freeze is shown
in g-h and cooling in i) and the last leaf to freeze was leaf 5 (red
arrow in g, cooled in h, second freezing event shown in i). The
secondary tiller froze (red arrow in i; the second freezing event is
shown in j).
|
|
More than one warming and recooling could occur sequentially at one
location. This would indicate that only part of the water that could
freeze at the location had frozen during the first warming and
recooling event, with more water freezing later.
Freezing of Whole Plants in the Laboratory
The effect on the spread of ice of simultaneous exposure of all
parts of the plant to the same temperature was tested. To do this,
young barley plants were placed on cardboard or polystyrene and ice was
placed in contact with the youngest fully expanded leaf of each plant,
and then freezing was followed during cooling.
Table I shows the time interval between
ice reaching the region where the sheath base joins the stem at the
base of the plant, and the first occurrence of freezing in other
organs. It therefore indicates the time to spread across the stem at
the base of the crown and reach each of the organs. These time
intervals differed significantly between organs, varying from seconds
to reach the roots, to minutes or about 1 h to reach the youngest
leaves and secondary tillers. The time-interval data for the acclimated
(n = 5) and nonacclimated plants (n = 4) tested was not significantly different (P > 0.05;
details not shown) and the data were therefore pooled in Table I. The
order of time interval for spread to these organs was: roots < leaf older than the nucleated leaf < leaves younger than the
nucleated leaves and secondary tillers.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I.
Time between the freezing front reaching the bottom
of the sheath of the first leaf to freeze, and reaching other organs
Plants of barley cv Gleam were grown in either a greenhouse
(nonacclimated: four plants) or in the field (acclimated: five plants)
and were analyzed in February 1999. Freezing was initiated by placing a
piece of ice in contact with the youngest fully expanded leaf. Nine
plants analyzed from three separate cooling runs, which each included
acclimated and nonacclimated plants.
|
|
The time intervals varied between plants and a more precise account of
the order in which freezing occurred was obtained by documenting it
separately for each plant. Figure 1 is
typical of the initiation and spread of freezing in the nine plants
used in Table I: The leaf in contact with ice froze first, the ice spread rapidly and nucleated the roots, ice then spread to the next
older leaf and subsequently to the younger leaves, and finally, it
spread to secondary tiller. The same order occurred in the acclimated
and nonacclimated plants tested (P > 0.05 in all
comparisons; details not shown). In two of the plants used in Table I
there were two leaves younger than the nucleated leaf. Further
tests were made of two more young barley plants and of two reproductive wheat plants each with two leaves younger than the one nucleated. In
all six specimens the leaf next youngest after the nucleated leaf froze
before the most recently emerged leaf.
Figure 1 also shows typical freezing of the leaves in two stages. The
first freezing event involved rapid spread of an area of slight
warming. This recooled and subsequently, a second freezing event
occurred that was more prolonged than the first freezing event and
involved a larger rise in temperature. Thus, in Figure 1, leaf 3 showed
the first freezing event (arrow in Fig. 1b), recooled (Fig. 1, c-e),
and then a second freezing event occurred (Fig. 1, f-h). The same
sequence occurred in the other leaves, older and younger than the first
leaf to freeze (Fig. 1), and all leaves of the nine plants analyzed in
Tables I through III, acclimated and nonacclimated, froze like this.
Thus the same pattern of freezing occurred in each leaf whether it was
the first leaf to freeze, initiated by external ice or froze later,
nucleated by ice spreading within the plant.
Table I also shows that spread of ice across the stem at the base of
the crown was much slower, between
1.5°C and
2.0°C, than below
2.9°C. Temperature also affected the time between the first and
second freezing event in the leaves: at and below
2.2°C it was a
few minutes, but at and above
1.9°C the average was 48 min (Table
II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II.
Time in each leaf of whole barley cv Gleam plants
between the start of the first and second freezing events
Experimental details were the same as in Table I. Leaves were analyzed
from 15 plants from three separate cooling runs, including four
nonacclimated plants and 11 acclimated plants.
|
|
The spread of the ice front in leaves was very rapid within each leaf:
1 to 3 cm s
1 in leaf blades and leaf sheaths of
the main and secondary tillers (Table
III). This did not differ significantly
between field-grown (acclimated) and greenhouse-grown (nonacclimated)
plants. However, spread was about twice as fast in younger leaves than
in older leaves. Again, spread was slower at
1.5°C and
2.0°C
than at and below
2.5°C, though the difference was smaller than the
effect of temperature on spread between organs.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III.
Rate of longitudinal spread of the first freezing
event in leaves of whole barley cv Gleam plants
Leaves and secondary tillers were analyzed from nine plants from three
separate cooling runs. Experimental details were the same as in Table
I. The data for leaf blades was analyzed by ANOVA to test for effects
of temperature, growth environment, and the position of the leaf on the
plant. ANOVA indicated significant differences (P < 0.01) between factors, and means were compared using confidence
intervals.
|
|
Visible damage symptoms were assessed 7 d after testing. The
lowest temperature that the plants in Tables I through III were exposed
to was
7.0°C. The nonacclimated plants showed damage symptoms,
whereas the acclimated plants did not.
Plants in pots or dug from the field and used with an intact root ball
were also tested. In these laboratory tests the soil was expected to
cool more slowly than the leaves and it was expected that the base of
the crown embedded in the soil surface would therefore also cool more
slowly than the leaves. Therefore, it was predicted that ice nucleated
in one leaf in each plant would not initially spread to other leaves or
other tillers. The first test was with four greenhouse-grown
(nonacclimated) plants in which one drop of a suspension of INA
bacteria was placed on one leaf of each plant. Figure
2A was typical; as expected, freezing in
the nucleated leaf did not immediately spread to other parts of the
plants.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Freezing of barley plants in pots and of excised
leaves of barley during cooling in a controlled environment chamber.
IRVT images in each of B through G are shown in time order. In A and C
through G, freezing was initiated by placing a droplet of a suspension
of INA bacteria on or touching the leaf surface. In B the plants were
sprayed with water till run-off. Black bars = 1 cm. The color
scale table (bottom right) indicates the temperature scale for each
figure. A, Freezing of a greenhouse-grown (nonacclimated) plant of
barley cv Gleam nucleated by a droplet of INA bacteria (black
arrow) placed on the surface of a leaf blade. In the image this leaf is
warmer than the other leaves. It had already begun to freeze, whereas
the other leaves (which remained cooler) had not. Note that freezing
had progressed into the sheath (red arrow) of the freezing leaf, but
not to the rest of the plant. At this stage in the experiment the soil
surface (s) was 1.00°C (in the pot showing at the base of plant),
whereas the unfrozen leaves were 3.0°C. Freezing did not spread to
the rest of the plant during the subsequent 75 min of observation, by
when the soil surface had cooled to 2.6°C. B, Freezing of a
field-grown (acclimated) plant of barley cv Gleam sprayed with water.
The images show three leaves from one tiller. (The semicircle of light
pink at the bottom left of the image is due to the soil [s] in the
plant pot.) In a, several leaves were freezing, indicated by their warm
color, including freezing of surface droplets (arrow heads). Later,
these leaves had completed their freezing (b), but had not nucleated
freezing of the youngest leaf (center of each figure). In this youngest
leaf a droplet at its tip froze first (red arrow in b) and this
initiated freezing in the whole leaf (warming shown in c). C and D,
Successive exposure to freezing of whole leaf blades excised from
plants of barley cv Igri grown in a 20°C/15°C (nonacclimating)
environment. In C the leaves were cooled to 7.0°C. They were then
thawed and kept for 3 h in a dark humid environment, during which
they remained water-soaked. In D they were then exposed again to
subzero cooling. In C there were two freezing events. Freezing began
from the droplet of INA bacteria (black arrow in a) and was first
indicated by a localized warming (change in color from pink/blue to
blue then to blue/white), which spread down the blade (red arrows in b
and c). The area of warming spread to the base of the blade (d) and
then cooled (e), indicating the end of the first freezing event.
Shortly after, the second freezing event began throughout the blade
(warming indicated by blue/white area in f, red arrowheads). The leaf
progressively warmed further (white to yellow in g-i), indicating
continuation of freezing, and then recooled (j and k), indicating
completion of the second freezing event. In D there was one freezing
event. The spread of warming was indicated by the spread of the area of
yellow and red down the leaf (b-h), beginning from the droplet of INA
bacteria (black arrow in a). The warming of the leaf was greater than
in the first freezing event in C, as indicated by the yellow and red
false color. E, Typical details of a time-sequence of freezing in part
of a leaf blade of barley cv Gleam. Freezing was initiated by a drop of
a suspension of INA bacteria placed on the middle of the lower surface
of the leaf, outside the upper edge of the field of view of the IRVT
images (m is a visible-light photograph of the leaf piece showing the
droplet: black arrow). a shows the leaf piece just before freezing.
Freezing first appeared as a wedge of warmer tissue (blue) in the upper
part of the image (b). This spread down the leaf (c and d) and cooled
(becoming pink in f). The second freezing event was indicated by
progressive warming in g through k (white to green to yellow) followed
by recooling (to pink/blue in l). Note that the warming that initially
spread down the leaf was most intense in narrow strips (red arrows in c
and d). The second freezing event began at the edge of the leaf (red
arrowheads in g) and spread inwards from there (h-j). F and G, Details
of freezing of excised pieces of partially water-soaked leaf blades
from plants of H. murinum (induced by 24 h in a 22°C,
dark, humid environment). In F (typical of five out of eight of the
leaves tested) initial warming spread in strips down the leaf (red
arrows in b and c). Immediately after, localized freezing events
occurred (red arrowheads in d) and rapidly recooled. This was followed
by a period in which many localized freezing events, which lasted for
varied times, occurred throughout the leaf (warmer patches in e). In G
(typical of three out of eight of the leaves tested) there was initial
spread of substantial warming down the middle of the leaf (b-e), and
again, this was followed by many localized freezing events throughout
the leaf (e).
|
|
The plant surface in many climates acquires condensed moisture early
during a freezing night. To simulate this, three greenhouse-grown (nonacclimated) and three field-grown (acclimated) plants were sprayed
with deionized water, to run-off. In these tests the soil surface
remained at or above
1.0°C and did not freeze during the course of
the experiment. Below a leaf and droplet temperature of
3°C, the
droplets of water on the shoots froze sporadically, some before the
leaves on which they were froze and some after. Most leaves froze
during the course of the experiment. Figure 2B shows typical results.
The leaves indicated froze at different times, and each froze by an
initial spread of ice from at or near the tip.
In these experiments using potted plants or plants dug from the field
and tested with root ball intact, freezing of a total of seven
greenhouse-grown (nonacclimated) and 10 field-grown (acclimated) plants
was examined. Damage to the leaves was visually assessed 7 d after
freezing. The lowest temperature of the leaves was
2.5°C to
5.0°C in different tests. In no tests did leaves of the acclimated plants show damage symptoms. In nonacclimated plants no damage was seen
when the lowest temperature reached was
2.5°C, whereas, in shoots
that cooled to
4.5°C, the leaves that froze showed damage symptoms
and those that did not freeze showed no symptoms.
Freezing of Excised Leaf Blades in the Laboratory
When leaf blades were cut from the plants and immediately cooled
there was again a very rapid spread through the leaf of an area of
slight warming followed by recooling, and then a second and larger rise
in temperature, which persisted for longer (Fig. 2C). Whereas the first
freezing event spread down the leaf, the second freezing event did not
start at one point and spread from there. Instead it started
simultaneously in many parts of the leaf.
Leaves from nonacclimated plants (grown in a 20°C/15°C environment)
were tested during two successive freezing tests in which they were
cooled to
7.0°C. Because they were not acclimated, the leaves were
killed by the first exposure to
7.0°C (confirmed by visible
symptoms). During the first test they froze typically, with an initial,
very rapid spread of an exotherm that quickly disappeared, followed
shortly by a second, more intense exotherm (Fig. 2C). When thawed they
had a water-soaked appearance. The leaves were stored for 3 h in a
dark, humid environment before retesting. They remained water-soaked,
indicating that the previous freeze killed the leaves and redistributed
water, filling the extracellular spaces. During the second test,
freezing occurred differently from the first test. The first freezing
event was much more intense (the leaf warmed much more and for much
longer) than in the preceding freezing test, and freezing spread much more slowly down the leaf (4.13 ± 0.42 cm
s
1 in the first freezing test and 0.40 ± 0.08 cm s
1 in the second; n = 6). In addition, although in the first test the second freezing event
occurred 11.5 ± 0.8 s (n = 6) after the
first freezing event, in the second test there was only a single
extended freezing event (Fig. 2D).
Digital analysis was used to obtain more precise temperature data than
could be obtained directly from the color video images. This confirmed
that the first freezing event involved a much smaller rise in
temperature and the rise lasted for a much shorter time than in the
second freezing event. Less than 0.37% ± 0.12% of leaf water froze
during the initial spread of freezing (first freezing event, Fig.
3A). The digital analysis showed a clear separation in time between the first occurrence of freezing at different places in the leaf, and this was observed during the first
spread of ice in the first and second freezing tests (Fig. 3B).
However, in the first test the second freezing event was clearly shown
as occurring at the same time in different parts of the leaf (Fig.
3B).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Rise in temperature with time at one (A) or two
(B) sites on leaf blades of barley cv Igri during typical freezing.
Temperature was averaged at one (A) or two (B) lines crossing the image
of the leaf, and averaged background temperature was subtracted. In B
the two lines were spaced 4 cm apart, 6 and 10 cm, respectively, from
the droplet of INA bacteria that nucleated freezing in the leaf. A,
First freezing event compared with the second freezing event. B,
Initial stages in freezing at the two positions in the leaf. Results
are shown for the same leaf during exposure to freezing for the first
time (first freezing test) or after cooling to 7.0°C and thawing,
during exposure for the second time (second freezing test). In both
tests ice spread down the leaf from the site of nucleation. Thus, the
position on the leaf that the ice reached first warmed first, and
warming occurred at the second site shortly after. Note that there was
a shorter time gap between the start of freezing at the two sites in
the first test (start of warming indicated by the single-headed bold
arrows) than between the start of freezing at the two sites in the
second test (start of warming indicated by stars). This indicates the
different rates of spread of ice in the two tests, 2.0 and 0.4 cm
s 1, respectively. Note
also that in the first test the start of the second freezing event
(indicated by the double-headed bold arrow) began at the same time at
both sites, and the subsequent curves of warming at the two sites
remained closely similar. On the other hand, in the second test the
curves of warming at the two sites remained separate.
|
|
Details of freezing were studied by close-up examination of leaf pieces
of only a few centimeters length (Fig. 2E). These confirmed the rapid
initial spread of ice and the higher more prolonged second freezing
event. In addition, they showed (n = 10) that the
warming of the specimen during the initial freezing event was not
evenly distributed across the leaf surface. Instead, more warming
occurred in narrow strips down the leaf (equal numbers of leaves
nucleated on the upper or lower surface with a drop of INA bacterial
solution gave the same appearance). This indicated some lateral
localization of the initial freezing event. The leaf pieces also showed
that the second freezing event began at the edge of the leaf and
progressed toward the mid-rib (Fig. 2E, g-j).
In these experiments with short pieces of leaf, freezing was initiated
by placing a drop of a suspension of INA bacteria in the center of the
leaf surface or touching one edge. This nucleated freezing throughout
the leaf, and not just along the central region or edge with which
the drop was in contact. This made it possible to measure the rate of
the initial spread of ice laterally across the leaf, as well as
longitudinally. The lateral spread was an order of magnitude slower
than the longitudinal spread (Table IV).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV.
Rate of longitudinal and lateral spread of first
freezing event in excised youngest fully expanded leaves from plants of
barley cv Gleam (grown in the greenhouse, nonacclimated, in the field,
acclimateda) and analyzed in February 1999
Freezing was initiated by freezing of a droplet of a suspension of INA
bacteria placed near the tip of each leaf. First spread of ice occurred
when leaves were at 2.5°C to 4.0°C.
|
|
Short pieces of leaf were also used to examine spread of ice in
partially water-soaked samples. Partial water soaking was obtained by
placing potted plants of H. murinum in a growth chamber at
22°C with no lights and 100% relative humidity for 24 h before excising leaves and exposing them to subzero cooling. This resulted in
one of two patterns of freezing. In five out of eight leaves tested,
the initial spread of ice occurred in the usual way, by a rapid spread
of ice, especially in strips. However, this was immediately followed by
localized, more intense, but short-lasting (1 to several s) freezing
events (Fig. 2F), which continued to occur in new locations until the
leaf had finished freezing. The time gap between the initial spread of
ice and the first localized higher-intensity freeze was 1.96 ± 0.82 s (mean ± SE; n = 5) and the two shortest intervals were 0.40 and 0.56 s. In three
out of eight leaves tested the initial spread of ice was slow and localized to the mid-rib region of the blade, and the warming in
this initial spread of ice was much higher than usual. However, this
was again immediately followed by localized spread laterally of the
area of warming accompanied by, as in the first type, localized high-intensity short-lasting freezing (Fig. 2G).
Freezing of Lawn Grass Leaves in Situ
To verify the relevance of parts of the laboratory
observations to Poaceae in the field, freezing of leaves of H. lanatus in a lawn was studied during a mild winter frost. Two
leaves froze at
1.5°C and two at
2.5°C. All leaves showed an
initial rapid spread of ice, seen as rapid spread of slight warming
lasting for a short time (Fig. 4; Table
V). At the higher temperature a second
freezing event did not occur within the period of observation, whereas
at the lower temperature a second freezing event occurred less than 1 min after the initial spread of ice. The initial spread of ice in two
leaves was basipetal. In one of these, droplets of water on the leaf
surface froze sequentially, starting near the base of the leaf and
freezing droplets further up the leaf. When freezing of these surface
droplets reached the tip, it nucleated freezing within the leaf. In the
other leaf the tip was nucleated, causing spread of ice through the
leaf, when ice spread on an adjacent frozen surface touching a droplet
at the leaf tip (Fig. 4, A and C). In the other two leaves the initial
spread of ice was acropetal. In one leaf, when the ice spreading
internally reached the tip of the leaf, it froze a guttated drop
located there (Fig. 4B). In the three leaves where freezing of the
droplet at the tip occurred, no difference in time could be detected
between the moment when the guttated droplet froze and the moment when freezing spread from or to the tip, indicating a direct connection between water freezing in the leaf and the guttated drops.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Freezing of leaves of H. lanatus in
situ in a lawn during a mild natural frost. Images in each of A through
C are shown in time order. No artificial aid to nucleation of freezing
was applied. Black bar = 1 cm. The color scale (top middle)
indicates the temperature for the figures. A, Spread of freezing on the
leaf surface in which droplets initiated freezing in adjacent droplets.
This progressed toward the tip and froze a droplet there that then
initiated the first freezing event in the leaf. Numerous water droplets
had condensed on the leaf surface (some indicated by the red arrowheads
in a). Droplets froze outside the field of view and nucleated droplets
toward the base of the leaf (indicated by a warmer area at the left in
b). Nucleation of surface droplets progressed sporadically, mainly
acropetally (c). When a droplet at the tip was nucleated (red arrow in
d) slight warming spread basipetally through the leaf (spread of the
green, warmed, area from the tip toward the base in e-g). Other
surface droplets subsequently froze (warmer areas in h), but eventually
further surface freezing events ceased (i). A second freezing event
within the leaf was not seen during the period of observation. B, The
first freezing event spread up the leaf and nucleated a guttated
droplet at the leaf tip. Warming spread up the leaf starting from
outside the field of view (slight warming indicated by white/blue at
the bottom of b). This spread to the tip where it nucleated freezing in
a guttated droplet. The red arrowhead in a indicates the droplet before
freezing; the red arrow in c indicates the droplet at the moment of
freezing; the guttated droplet continued to emit heat in d through f,
but had cooled again in g. The leaf cooled slightly (d) following the
spread of freezing to the tip of the leaf. The second freezing event,
indicated by warming, began at several points in the leaf (white and
white/blue patches in e). This then spread and increased in
warmth (green and white areas in f) and then cooled (g), completing the
second freezing event. C, Contact between frozen droplets on the
background surface and a droplet at the leaf tip initiated the first
freezing event in the leaf. The leaf tip was touching a nearby surface
on which moisture had condensed and was freezing. When freezing of this
moisture spread to droplets that touched the tip of the leaf it
initiated freezing in the leaf (red arrow in b) and warming spread
basipetally through the leaf (white and green areas in b-d) and then
cooled (e).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table V.
Rate of longitudinal spread of first freezing event
in fully expanded leaves of H. lanatus tested in situ during a natural
frost
No artificial aids to nucleate freezing were used.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
IRVT showed freezing throughout the barley plant, allowing a
comprehensive account of the spread of ice to be obtained: (a) The
first and second freezing events in leaves are distinct. The first
involves a rapid longitudinal spread of freezing, mainly in narrow
strips, involving only a small fraction of leaf water. In contrast, the
second freezing event spreads slowly and locally, from the margin of
the leaf toward the mid-rib, and occurs simultaneously throughout
the length of the leaf. It involves freezing of most of the
leaf's water, causing the intracellular dehydration that stresses the
plant. (b) Above
2°C the initial spread of freezing through the
crown is delayed much more than at lower temperatures. This sets an
important limitation on the ability of freezing initiated in one organ
to spread further. Consistent with this, our results also indicate that
nucleation of freezing occurs independently in different leaves. Thus
any function the barriers have in adaptation to freezing could be in
protecting the crown rather than preventing spread to other leaves. (c)
Without the initial spread of ice from a point of nucleation, the plant
will not experience freezing stress. Thus
any strategy to modify freezing
behavior in plants must address the route by which
freezing spreads. The water that freezes during the initial spread of
ice is probably drawn from cell walls. If so, it is only a fraction of
the total water present in cell walls, and may be drawn only from the
most gel-like parts. (d) The species used acclimated only moderately in
the environments used, so the results need not be typical of all
cereals or the most strongly acclimatory environments. Nevertheless,
our experiments showed no differences in freezing behavior between the
cold-acclimated and nonacclimated plants.
Natural Freezing
Freezing in the leaves during a natural frost was similar to that
in leaves tested in the laboratory. There was an initial freezing event
that comprised rapid spread of ice, but freezing of only a fraction of
the leaf water. When the temperature fell further, there was a second
freezing event during which much more water froze. The rate of spread
of ice in the first freezing event was also similar to in the
laboratory. Thus the more detailed analysis in the laboratory tests was
likely to be indicative of behavior and mechanisms in leaves in the field.
Laboratory experiments have shown that ice may enter leaves through
stomata (Wisniewski and Fuller, 1999
). However, at night, stomata will
be closed. In our field experiments done at night, the hydathodes at
the tip of the leaves, through which water guttated, was an important
channel for ice to spread into or out of the plant (Fig. 4). Laboratory
tests indicated that guttated water itself does not have a high
nucleation temperature (not shown), and in the limited observations in
the field it was frozen by contact with ice nucleated from elsewhere.
Nevertheless, in our field experiments droplets that froze on the leaf
surface did not nucleate freezing in the leaf except when the droplet
at the leaf tip was nucleated.
Intercellular spaces in hydathodes are connected to the termination of
vascular strands. However, there is not a free path of water between
the guttating drop and the lumen of the xylem elements since the
strands terminate in tracheids (Esau, 1965
). It is generally thought
that there would be a delay in ice crossing into tracheids or crossing
the end-walls of vessels, due to the presence of pit membranes (Single
and Marcellos, 1981
; Záme
ník et al., 1994
).
However, we could not detect any delay, which may indicate that the
initial rapid spread of ice through the leaf was not through the
xylem vessels or that pore size in these pit membranes was not restrictive.
Rates of Spread of Freezing in Leaves
The rate of longitudinal spread of freezing in the
leaf blades was rapid, between 1 and 4 cm s
1,
depending on age and freezing temperature, with an overall average of
2.6 cm s
1. These are among the fastest rates of
spread recorded in plants, though earlier estimates are close; up to 2 cm s
1 in nonacclimated wheat (Single and
Marcellos, 1981
), 1 cm s
1 in mulberry (Kitaura,
1967
), and 0.4 cm s
1 in barley seminal
internodes and bean internodes (Záme
ník et al.,
1994
; Wisniewski et al., 1997
).
The fastest rates of spread of freezing in plants are somewhat faster
than the linear growth rate of ice in water, which at atmospheric
pressure and when supercooled by about 1° K, is 0.5 cm
s
1 (Hobbs, 1974
). To obtain a rate comparable
with the fastest found in plants, above 2 cm
s
1, supercooling of about 5° K is needed
(Hobbs, 1974
). Allowing for a depression of freezing point of about
1° K (Levitt, 1980
), this is several degrees more supercooling than
occurred in our experiments. Growth of ice from the vapor phase is much
slower than in water, of the order of 10
4 cm
s
1 (Hobbs, 1974
). Thus plants show unusual
freezing behavior compared with physical experiments, speeding the
spread of ice.
Rapid dissipation of the heat released from the very small amount of
water frozen during the initial spread of ice could explain this.
Dissipation of the heat of fusion is a major factor determining the
rate of growth of ice (Hobbs, 1974
). The amount of water that froze
during the initial spread of ice accounted for less than 0.4% of the
total leaf water. Consistent with this explanation, the warming at the
spreading front was much higher and the associated rate of spread was
slower in the water-soaked leaves, in which more water froze initially.
The Route of the Initial Spread of Ice in Leaves
The IRVT method used does not resolve ice formation in or around
individual cells. However, it did show differences in freezing between
adjacent areas within leaves at distances of less than 1 mm. In
addition, it provided circumstantial evidence relating to the precise
locations of ice.
The initial longitudinal spread of freezing in leaves occurred mainly
in strips that could have corresponded to main ribs, and if so, this
spread could have been associated closely with the vascular bundles.
However, this need not indicate freezing in the vessels themselves. In
Solanum and Brassica, freezing in petioles first
occurred in vascular tissue and adjacent intercellular spaces (Hudson
and Idle, 1962
). Several of our observations indicate that the initial
spread of freezing was not through the xylem elements themselves.
Freezing withdraws water from leaf cells, forming ice in the
intercellular spaces (Pearce, 1988
; Pearce and Ashworth, 1992
). If the
leaf is damaged, then on thawing, this water remains in the
intercellular spaces causing a water-soaked appearance. However, water
would have remained in the xylem vessels. Thus, one would expect to see
the same rapid initial spread of freezing in ribs in non-damaged,
non-water-soaked leaves and in damaged, fully water-soaked leaves.
However, the patterns of spread (Figs. 2, C and D and 3B) and initial
rates of spread, which differed by a factor of 10, were quite
different. This may indicate that the initial longitudinal spread of
ice was in both cases extracellular.
In five of the partially water-soaked leaves there was a typical first
freezing event involving rapid spread of freezing in strips down the
leaf (Fig. 2F). However, these then initiated localized
short-lived freezing events in between under 1 s and a few
seconds, again suggesting initial spread was extracellular.
The rate of lateral spread in leaves was an order of magnitude less
than the rate of longitudinal spread. Minor vein connections run
laterally between the longitudinal veins. In festucoid grasses they
occur with a frequency connecting each pair of longitudinal vascular
bundles of about 1 per mm (illustration in Pate and Gunning, 1969
) or
more (illustration in Esau, 1965
). The lateral veins do not form a
linear path across the leaf, instead, any ice spreading laterally
through xylem vessels would have to take a tortuous route, which might
then partially explain the slower rate of spread laterally than
longitudinally. However, it is equally plausible that spread occurred
outside the vascular bundles since paths of travel at right angles to
each other might lead to different rates of travel due the different
structure of the leaf in the lateral and longitudinal directions.
The proportion of the leaf water that froze during the initial spread
of ice was under 0.4%. Assuming the initial spread of ice was
extracellular, then there are two sources of water for this initial
freeze: the vapor phase in the gas spaces and the cell walls. The
former would contribute a negligible amount: a fall in temperature from
0°C to
5°C would contribute through condensation about 4 × 10
5% of the leaves water content (based on a
change in water content of the vapor phase of 62.5 × 10
6 mol L
1 between
0°C and
5°C). The proportion of the leaf water volume accounted
for by water in the cell walls is about 6% (assuming the cell wall
accounts for about 10% of the leaf fresh weight and that it has a
water content of 60%-70%). Thus much less than the full amount of
water in the cell walls froze during this initial spread of ice. The
small pore sizes in plant cell walls, averaging 4 nm (Preston, 1974
),
would reduce the average freezing point of water in the wall to between
15°C and
25°C (Ashworth and Ables, 1984
). The converse will
follow, that the vapor pressure of ice outside the cell walls will not
be low enough at temperatures above these to draw water out from such
pores. On the other hand, water might be drawn from more gel-like parts
of cell walls such as the middle lamella or from water-rich wall layers
found in some fibers. If so, the distribution of these sources of
wall water at the tissue and organ level could influence the route of
the initial spread of ice.
The Second Freezing Event
In leaves of freeze-stressed temperate cereals ice is
extracellular (Pearce, 1988
; Pearce and Ashworth, 1992
). The
second freezing event accounts for most of the freezing in the leaf and therefore must comprise formation of this extracellular ice.
The ice formed during the first freezing event probably initiates the
second freezing event. In other respects, the two freezing events are
separable. When the first freezing event began above
2°C the
occurrence of the second freezing event could be delayed (using a slow
cooling rate) for a considerable time. However, if the first freezing
event occurred below
2°C, the second freezing event followed within
a few minutes or seconds. This indicates that the two freezing events
involved separate fractions of plant water with different freezing
points, one above
2°C and one just below. This is consistent with
the first freezing event being apoplasmic, whereas the second involved
drawing water from the symplast.
Other details confirm the distinctness of the two freezing events. The
first freezing event spread longitudinally through the leaf and thus
reached different parts of the leaf at different times, but the second
freezing event began simultaneously at different points along the
length of the leaf (Figs. 2C and 3B). Also, the second freezing event
began first at the edge and spread toward the center of the leaf from
there, whereas the first freezing event involved longitudinal spread
across the leaf's width (Fig. 2E).
Spread of Freezing through the Plant
In festucoid grasses the largest vascular bundles originating in a
leaf have major connections in the stem with the vascular bundles of
the leaves inserted two nodes above and below, and are connected only
indirectly via these main connections and via the nodal plexus with the
leaves inserted one node to either side (Hitch and Sharman, 1971
). When
the joined vasculatures reach the base of the crown they connect with
the root vasculature via the complex network of the vascular transition
zone. Thus if the spread of freezing were confined to the xylem
vessels, at least parts of the rest of the shoot should freeze before
any of the roots, and leaves two-above and two-below the nucleated leaf
should freeze before the leaves adjacent to it. However, when the
freezing front reached the crown it always first initiated freezing in the roots, and the next leaf above the nucleated one froze before the
one next above that.
Embolisms may form in vessels as a result of freezing, though the
vessels can refill when thawed (Canny, 1997
). The vascular system of
angiosperms is segmented; vessels are terminated by tracheids at nodes,
and this prevents the spread of embolisms between organs (Aloni, 1987
).
These termini are more frequent in the vascular transition zone between
the root and shoot in hardy than in tender cereals (Aloni and Griffith,
1991
), and spread of ice is delayed in this zone
(Záme
ník et al., 1995
). The node is also a barrier
to the spread of freezing in the reproductive stem of wheat. Single and
Marcellos (1981)
suggested that the barrier is the tracheal termini in
the node, and that passage of ice across the node is in or around
living cells. The same pattern of spread occurs in the first barley
leaf to freeze as in the barley leaf that freezing spreads to last.
This would be unlikely if spread were first in the vessels and then
outside them.
Our results show that below
2.0°C the delay to spread of ice caused
by these barriers is only a few seconds, whereas above
2.0°C the
delay may be prolonged or indefinite. Thus, in young barley plants the
barriers are unlikely to be effective in reducing spread of ice
throughout the plant except in the mildest frosts. In many frost
situations the base of the plant will tend to be warmer than the
exposed parts of the leaves. This difference in temperature could, in
vegetative plants, also be an effective barrier delaying spread
from one leaf to the rest of the plant (Fig. 2A). However, in the
laboratory and in nature, individual leaves of barley are capable of
freezing separately (Fig. 2B). Fuller and Wisniewski (1998)
made
similar observations in potato. Ice did not travel from one shoot
growing up from the tuber to another, because of, it was suggested,
insulation by the soil. Shoot morphology is quite different in potato
and barley. Nevertheless, as in barley, leaves of potato sprayed with
water froze independently, thus structural or biochemical barriers were
important in both species.
Thus the role of these barriers in cereals, if they have one, would be
to control freezing of the crown, rather than to protect leaves from
freezing. This is interesting because the crown is often as
frost-sensitive or more sensitive than other parts of cereal and grass
shoots (Tanino and McKersie, 1985
; Shibata and Shimada, 1986
) and the
survival of the crown is essential for plant survival (Olien,
1967
).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material and Growth Environments
Barley (Hordeum vulgare cv Gleam) was grown
in nonacclimating and cold-acclimating environments. The nonacclimating
environment comprised a greenhouse at the Seale-Hayne campus of the
University of Plymouth (Devon, UK) maintained with a minimum
temperature of 10°C and supplementary lighting during an 8-h day. The
acclimating environment comprised a field site also at the Seale Hayne
campus of the University of Plymouth (50° 32' N, 3° 34' W; January
mean temperature of 5.7°C). At this site the daily minimum and
maximum air temperatures in the 7 d preceding use of the plants in
February 1999 varied from
1.5°C to
8.8°C and from 6.4°C to
10.6°C, respectively. Barely cv Igri was grown in a nonacclimating
environment of 20°C/15°C (day/night temperature, 10-h photoperiod,
250 µmol m
2 s
1 photon flux density).
Hordeum murinum was grown in a similar controlled
environment using a cold-acclimating temperature of 6°C/2°C.
Holcus lanatus was growing wild in a lawn in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (55° 0' N, 1° 40' W; January mean temperature
3.7°C) and was tested in February 2000. In the 7 d immediately
preceding the test the daily grass minimum temperature varied between
1.2°C and 3.1°C and daily grass maximum temperature varied
between 6.4°C and 12.0°C, as recorded at the nearby University of
Newcastle Close House Field Station.
Freezing-Test Environments and IRVT
Freezing of barley cv Gleam was tested at Seale Hayne in a
controlled environment radiation freezing chamber giving a steady cooling profile and using a cooling rate of between 1°C
h
1 and 3°C h
1 (Fuller and LeGrice, 1998
).
Freezing of H. lanatus was observed in situ during a
mild natural frost in February 2000. Freezing of barley cv Igri and of
H. murinum was done at Newcastle University in a
controlled environment chamber giving a steady cooling rate of 2°C
h
1 and a minimum temperature that could be maintained for
prolonged periods with less than 0.5°C variation.
An infrared imaging camera using a HgCdTe long-wave detector (model
760, Inframetrics, North Billerica, MA) was used to monitor exothermic
events in the freezing plants (Wisniewski et al., 1997
). Frame
averaging of 16 frames s
1 was used to smooth the image.
The results were recorded on video tape as color and black-and-white
images using two recorders. Thermocouples placed in the field of view
in contact with the background, but not touching the plant were used as
an independent check of the temperatures recorded. The temperature
recorded by the camera was also standardized against an ice-water
mixture at 0°C.
The image delivered by the camera used false color to show the
temperature. The temperature scale used covered a 2°C range from
"cold" colors (pink and blue) to "warm" colors (yellow and red). The plant material was placed against a background chosen to be
of a different temperature to the plant, warmer or cooler (depending on
the background material). This provided sufficient contrast for the
specimen to be visualized by the camera before it froze, and thus to
position the plant in the camera's field of view and to focus the
image. It was important to avoid confounding warming of the plant due
to any warming in the environment with warming due to heat released
during freezing. Therefore we discounted any warming of the plant that
was accompanied by warming in the background. The color image
facilitated visual detection of exotherms with a temperature resolution
of between 0.1°C and 0.2°C.
The black-and-white recording was analyzed using the program Thermagram
Plot (Inframetrics). This allowed quantification of freezing. Warming
(in Kelvin) due to freezing was detected by subtracting the average
temperature of pixels in a 0.7-cm line in the background from the
average temperature of pixels in a 0.7-cm line in the image of the
leaf. Freezing occurred during a period of slow cooling and raised the
temperature of the sample by less than 1°K, and thus gave only small
changes in the driving force (gradient of temperature between leaf and
the condenser of the cooling unit) for removal of heat throughout the
test period. Thus the amount of water freezing was proportional to the
area under the graph of temperature against time during freezing. The proportion of water freezing in the first freezing event was calculated as the area under the graph of temperature against time during the
first freezing event relative to the area under the whole graph of
first and second freezing event, from initiation of freezing to
completion. A remaining small amount of unfrozen water would freeze
subsequently as temperature fell further, and therefore this
calculation gave a maximum estimate of the proportion of leaf water
frozen in the first freezing event.
The video images were studied frame-by-frame to obtain the time and
location of start and finish of freezing events. The dimensions of
excised leaves and of the organs of plants used in the experiments was
measured. From this data the rate of spread within organs and the time
for spread between organs was calculated.
Statistically significant effects were detected by t
tests or in Table III, by ANOVA and estimates of 95% confidence intervals.
After plants had been used in freezing tests they were placed in the
greenhouse environment described above and assessed after 1 week for
visual symptoms of damage: loss of turgor and dryness indicated killed
regions and premature yellowing of leaves indicated a sublethal effect.
INA Bacteria
The ice-nucleating bacterium, Pseudomonas
syringae strain Cit7 (Lindow, 1985
), was grown for
72 h on plates of King's medium B (King et al., 1954
) at 20°C.
The plates were then stored at 4°C to induce expression of the
ice-nucleation protein. Cells were harvested with a loop and suspended
in sterile deionized water and stored on ice before use.
Received May 22, 2000; modified July 10, 2000; accepted August 23, 2000.