|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, February 2001, Vol. 125, pp. 779-786 Cavitation Fatigue. Embolism and Refilling Cycles Can Weaken the Cavitation Resistance of Xylem1Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Although cavitation and refilling cycles could be common in plants, it is unknown whether these cycles weaken the cavitation resistance of xylem. Stem or petiole segments were tested for cavitation resistance before and after a controlled cavitation-refilling cycle. Cavitation was induced by centrifugation, air drying of shoots, or soil drought. Except for droughted plants, material was not significantly water stressed prior to collection. Cavitation resistance was determined from "vulnerability curves" showing the percentage loss of conductivity versus xylem pressure. Two responses were observed. "Resilient" xylem (Acer negundo and Alnus incana stems) showed no change in cavitation resistance after a cavitation-refilling cycle. In contrast, "weakened" xylem (Populus angustifolia, P. tremuloides, Helianthus annuus stems, and Aesculus hippocastanum petioles) showed considerable reduction in cavitation resistance. Weakening was observed whether cavitation was induced by centrifugation, air dehydration, or soil drought. Observations from H. annuus showed that weakening was proportional to the embolism induced by stress. Air injection experiments indicated that the weakened response was a result of an increase in the leakiness of the vascular system to air seeding. The increased air permeability in weakened xylem could result from rupture or loosening of the cellulosic mesh of interconduit pit membranes during the water stress and cavitation treatment.
There have been a number of reports
suggesting that cavitation and emptying of xylem conduits can be
followed at close intervals by their refilling (Tyree et al.,
1986 There are reasons to suspect that refilled vessels might not be as
resistant to cavitation as when fresh from the vascular cambium. There
is substantial evidence that cavitation by water stress occurs by the
"air seeding" mechanism (Zimmermann, 1983 There is only one instance that we know where the cavitation resistance
of refilled vessels has been tested. In this experiment, stems of
Betula occidentalis were used to generate a "vulnerability curve" showing the loss of xylem conductivity from cavitation (percentage loss of conductivity [PLC]) with decreasing xylem pressure. The stems were then refilled in the laboratory and the curve
repeated. The second curve was identical to the first, demonstrating that cavitation did not weaken the vessels (Alder et al., 1997
In this paper we surveyed six species to determine the effect of a cavitation and refilling cycle on cavitation resistance. We used stem or petiole segments that had not been significantly water stressed prior to collection. These segments were subjected to water stress and refilling cycles under controlled laboratory conditions. Additional experiments were conducted in selected species to compare laboratory results with controlled soil drought in intact plants and to investigate the mechanism for the surprising differences that we observed in the response of xylem to the cavitation and refilling cycle.
Native Versus Stressed Vulnerability Curves All native vulnerability curves possessed a similar shape, with little PLC occurring until xylem pressures dropped below some threshold value, which caused the PLC to increase steeply (Figs. 1 and 2, solid squares). Material used for these experiments was unlikely to have experienced significant drought-induced embolism. For Helianthus annuus and Aesculus hippocastanum we only used segments with less than 10% native PLC. The remaining material was from a riparian Red Butte Canyon site that does not experience soil drought or xylem pressures below the embolism thresholds for the native curves in Figures 1 and 2.
Stressed vulnerability curves revealed two different responses to the
cavitation-refilling treatment. In the "resilient" response (Acer negundo and Alnus incana), the stressed
curve was identical to the native curve (Fig. 1, compare open versus
solid squares), as had been found previously for B. occidentalis (Fig. 1C; Alder et al., 1997 Air Dehydration Versus Centrifuge Comparison and Soil Drought Experiments The weakening response was identical whether xylem was stressed to
>70 PLC on the centrifuge or by air drying. The PLC at test xylem
pressures of The weakening effect was also observed in H. annuus stems that had been stressed in the intact plant during controlled soil drought. In stems where native PLC exceeded 95% as a result of the drought, the vulnerability curve showed an even greater weakening effect than curves from stems stressed in the centrifuge (Fig. 2D, compare open circles and open squares). The greater weakening in the droughted plants was associated with their having been stressed to greater PLC (>95%) than the centrifuged stems (75%-95%). Further results from H. annuus confirmed that the extent of
weakening depended on the extent of native embolism induced by the
previous stress treatment. When native PLC caused by the stress treatment was plotted versus the PLC induced by a
The Bubble Versus Air Seeding Hypotheses for the Weakening Response Experiments on P. angustifolia and H. annuus
did not support the hypothesis that weakening resulted from bubbles
remaining in xylem conduits after the refilling treatment. P. angustifolia stems stressed to >70 PLC and refilled showed the
same PLC at a test pressure of Results did support the air seeding hypothesis. In the weakened species P. angustifolia and A. hippocastanum, there was significantly more PLC by air injection at a test pressure for stressed versus native material (Fig. 4, white bars, compare native versus stressed). In contrast, the resilient stems of A. negundo (Fig. 1A) did not show any difference in PLC by air injection in native versus stressed stems (Fig. 5, white bars, native versus stressed).
According to the air-seeding hypothesis, the PLC in native or stressed xylem should be the same whether it was induced by air injection or dehydration. This was the case in all instances (Figs. 4 and 5) except stressed stems of P. angustifolia. In these stems the air injection caused less PLC than expected from dehydration results (Fig. 4A, compare white and black bars for stressed material). This may have resulted from the applied test pressure being less than the actual injection pressure (see "Materials and Methods"). This was supported by results of the pulsed injection applied to A. hippocastanum petioles. Whereas normal injection at the test pressure of 1 MPa caused 31.7 ± 4.4 PLC in stressed petioles, the pulsed method (same test pressure) resulted in a higher value of 51.9 ± 7.4 PLC, which was not significantly different from stressed petioles centrifuged to the test xylem pressure as shown in Figure 4B ("stressed, injected" versus "stressed, spun"). Applying the pulsed procedure to native petioles of this species caused no difference (P > 0.05) in the test pressure PLC versus the steady injection (7.6 ± 4.2 versus 7.4 ± 4.1 PLC, respectively).
The results revealed two responses to controlled
cavitation-refilling cycles. In the resilient response there was no
change in cavitation resistance (Fig. 1), as seen previously for
B. occidentalis (Alder et al., 1997 It is presumable that the increased leakiness occurred at the
inter-conduit pit membranes where air seeding has been shown to occur
in other studies (Crombie et al., 1985 Our results were obtained from contrived, often severe, stress events
in the laboratory and the greenhouse, and all material was refilled
under artificial conditions. How relevant are the results to cavitation
resistance of intact plants in the field? Weakening in H. annuus was proportional to native PLC (Fig. 3), suggesting that
whenever cavitation occurs weakening would follow for a non-resilient
species. With the exception of the droughted H. annuus, our
material showed no evidence of substantial weakening in the native
state: all native curves possessed a roughly sigmoidal shape with a
threshold embolism pressure (Figs. 1 and 2, native curves). However, we
purposely selected young material that was unlikely to have experienced
significant cavitation in situ. The naturally growing plants in Red
Butte Canyon live in a consistently moist riparian habitat where
minimum stem xylem pressure is not likely to vary during the growing
season (e.g. Sperry and Sullivan, 1992 In contrast, a different type of native vulnerability curve is often
seen in stem xylem of species that experience strong seasonal variation
in soil moisture. For example, upland species from the Sonoran desert
possess very high native PLC (>50%) even under favorable water
availability, and the native curves can have a shape very similar to
that of the weakened xylem in our study (Pockman and Sperry, 2000 Root xylem of woody plants often exhibits the same symptoms of
weakening. Roots can have high native PLC (>50%; Sperry and Saliendra, 1994 In our study we only addressed weakening caused by water stress-induced
cavitation. It is possible, but not documented, that weakening may also
be caused by freezing-induced cavitation. However, this is unlikely in
our species since some of the native material we used had been
subjected to at least one winter, and previous studies have indicated
that extensive cavitation by freezing is likely in our species (Sperry
and Sullivan, 1992 Further experiments are needed to test whether weakening is a permanent
condition, or whether processes associated with natural refilling in
intact plants can restore the initial cavitation resistance. Weakening
could compromise the functioning of species experiencing cavitation and
refilling cycles in nature. These species may possess resilient xylem
or may have some means of repairing the weakening effect. The
phenomenon of cavitation fatigue complicates the interpretation of
vulnerability curves because it means that they can represent the
inherent properties of the original xylem and its subsequent stress
history. The weakening effect explains the large differences seen in
some vulnerability curves when performed on flushed versus non-flushed
native material (Sperry et al., 1991
Plant Material Stem segments were collected from Populus
angustifolia James, Populus tremuloides Michx.,
Alnus incana Moench, and Acer negundo growing along Red Butte creek in Red Butte Canyon near Salt Lake City
(111o47'W, 40o47'N, elevation 1,750 m). This is
the same site from which Betula occidentalis Hook. stems
of the Alder et al. (1996) Petiole segments of Aesculus hippocastanum were collected in July 1999 from a single tree on the campus of the University of Utah where it received frequent irrigation. We also collected stem segments from greenhouse-grown Helianthus annuus. Plants were grown in 4.5-L pots under natural light and well-watered conditions until the incipient flowering stage when they were used for the experiments. The soil consisted of 22% each of topsoil, perlite, and wood mulch, 17% vermiculite, 11% peat mulch, and 6% sand. Native Versus Stressed Vulnerability Curves The cavitation resistance of the xylem was determined from vulnerability curves that show the relationship between xylem pressure and the PLC caused by cavitation and subsequent embolism of the xylem conduits. Comparison was made between the "native" curve measured on branch segments after collection versus the "stressed" curve measured on segments previously stressed in the laboratory to a xylem pressure causing >70 PLC (Fig. 6, procedure 1) and then refilled.
Native and stressed vulnerability curves were measured using the
centrifugal force method (Alder et al., 1997 Except for A. hippocastanum, the stressed curve was measured on the same segments used for the native curve. The segments were flushed to refill embolized conduits and restore hydraulic conductivity to within 10% of the original Kmax. In a few heavily embolized segments (PLC > 90%), the initial Kmax could not be restored after multiple flushes. The reason for this is unknown, and these segments were discarded. The stressed vulnerability curve was measured on the refilled segments with a minimum sample size of six. Air Versus Centrifuge Dehydration Comparison To test whether the weakened resistance to cavitation that we
observed in stressed stems of some species (the "weakened"
response, see "Results") was a function of the xylem pressure
versus mechanical stress in stems during centrifugation, we compared
the effect of stressing the xylem in the centrifuge with comparable
water stress induced by air dehydration (Fig. 6, "air dry" option
in procedure 2). Two species showing the weakening response were chosen
(A. hippocastanum and P. angustifolia).
Unstressed, native material was flushed and centrifuged
(n = 6-8) or air-dried (n = 5-8) to a stress pressure inducing >70 PLC. Segments were reflushed, and then centrifuged at a moderate test pressure of Air drying experiments were also conducted on detached shoots of
H. annuus. Nine shoots were dried, and PLC was measured
on stem segments that had been excised from the shoots under water to
avoid causing embolism during collection. Stems were refilled, centrifuged to a test pressure of Controlled Soil Drought Experiments We used the greenhouse-grown H. annuus plants
(see "Plant Material") to compare the extent of weakening caused by
soil drought in intact plants with that caused by centrifugal or
air-drying stress on excised stems. Plants were well-watered until the
incipient flowering at which time water was withheld for >1 week. Stem
segments (n = 11 from 11 plants) were excised from
droughted plants under water to avoid causing embolism during
collection, were measured for native embolism, and were refilled.
Segments with >95% native PLC (n = 5) were used
to generate a complete vulnerability curve using the centrifuge method.
The other six segments were centrifuged to a test pressure of Experiments on the Mechanism of the Weakening Response We tested two hypotheses proposed to account for the weakening response. The first was the bubble hypothesis: After flushing a stressed and embolized segment, residual bubbles remained in the vessels to nucleate cavitation at mild xylem pressures in the stressed stems. The second was the air-seeding hypothesis: The xylem conduits become more leaky to air as a result of the stress episode, thus lowering the air-seeding threshold and increasing the vulnerability to cavitation. We tested the bubble hypothesis on P. angustifolia with
two types of experiments. In one experiment, a set of stems
(n = 3) was exposed to a stress pressure causing
>70 PLC and flushed to within 10% of Kmax.
Stems were submerged in water and pressurized at 2 MPa overnight to
promote bubble dissolution, and the PLC at a We also tested the bubble hypothesis on H. annuus stems
that had been naturally embolized during the soil drought. One set of
embolized stems was flushed with the normal non-degassed water supply,
and a second was flushed with degassed water. Flushing lasted >30 min.
Stems were then embolized at a test pressure of We tested the air seeding hypothesis with a series of air injection
experiments on stem segments of P. angustifolia and
A. negundo and petiole segments from A.
hippocastanum. The air injection procedure determined the PLC
caused by pushing air into xylem vessels through air seeding sites. It
is normal that the PLC caused by air pressure is the same as that
caused by xylem pressure of equal, but opposite, magnitude (Sperry et
al., 1996 A potential shortcoming of this injection procedure is that the air pressure measured by the gauge on the chamber may not be the same as the pressure at the actual site of air injection in the segment's vascular system when air is flowing from the chamber and through the stem xylem to the outside. To minimize this potential problem we designed a "pulsed" injection procedure that we applied to the petioles of A. hippocastanum for comparison with the normal injection. The double-ended injection chamber (with segment) was enclosed within a larger closed pressure chamber. Both chambers were initially pressurized to the test pressure, blocking flow through the segment, and equalizing all pressure at the gauge value of the injection chamber. The pressure in the larger chamber was then quickly reduced to ambient, exposing the segment to a pulse of air equal to the gauge pressure. After 1.5 min of this pulse, the large chamber was repressurized to block flow and bring all pressures back to the gauge value. By repeating this pressure pulse we could repeatedly expose the segment to an injection pressure close to the gauge pressure. We used three pressure pulses of 1.5 min each for each segment. As summarized in Figure 6 (procedure 2) PLC caused by air injection at the test pressure was compared for flushed native segments versus separate segments previously stressed to >70 PLC in the centrifuge and flushed. If weakening was associated with a change in air-seeding pressure, it should be detected by greater PLC by air injection in stressed versus native stems. At least five stem segments were used for each air injection treatment. Statistics Differences between native and stressed vulnerability curves were based on Student's t tests at each test pressure. Comparisons of test pressure embolism between treatments (e.g. Fig. 4) were made with a one-way ANOVA and the LSD test for multiple pairwise comparisons. The SPSS 8.0 statistics package was used to analyze the data (SPSS Inc., Chicago).
Received May 15, 2000; returned for revision August 28, 2000; accepted November 1, 2000. 1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. IBN-9723464), by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (grant no. 97-37100-2649 to J.S.S.), and by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation, Germany (Feodor-Lynen fellowship to U.G.H.).
* Corresponding author; e-mail hacke{at}biology.utah.edu; fax 801-581-4668.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|