Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.

Plant Physiol, July 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 921-922

ON THE INSIDE



    On the Scent of a Flower
TOP
On the Scent of...
Calreticulin and Ca2+...
Cholesterol Oxidase and the...
Double-Stranded RNA and RNA...
A Triple Mutant That...
Engineered Resistance to Sulfur...

The flowers of most insect-pollinated species produce complex mixtures of volatiles that give each species their unique fragrance. Floral fragrances belong to a broad category of secondary metabolites comprised mainly of terpenoid, benzenoid, and phenylpropanoid compounds. Despite their importance in pollination biology, floral scents have received surprisingly scant attention from plant physiologists and molecular biologists. In this issue, Kolosova et al. (pp. 956-964) reveal that the forces of selection that have crafted the exquisite macroscopic architecture of flowers have been no less impressive at the subcellular level. Their subject of study was S-adenosyl-L-Met:benzoic acid carboxyl methyl transferase (BAMT), the enzyme that yields methylbenzoate, the benzenoid ester that is one of the most abundant scent compounds in snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus). BAMT was found to be immunolocalized predominantly in the conical cells of the inner (adaxial) epidermis of snapdragon petal lobes (Fig. 1). The localization of scent production to those flower surfaces upon which the pollinators alight is an architectural nuance that serves to increase pollination efficiency and minimize the biosynthetic cost of advertising for pollinators.



View larger version (234K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Scanning electron micrograph of the conical, scent-emitting cells of the adaxial epidermis of snapdragon flowers.


    Calreticulin and Ca2+ Homeostasis
TOP
On the Scent of...
Calreticulin and Ca2+...
Cholesterol Oxidase and the...
Double-Stranded RNA and RNA...
A Triple Mutant That...
Engineered Resistance to Sulfur...

Along with the vacuole, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is one of the major intracellular storage sites for Ca2+ ions in plant cells. It contains a variety of Ca2+ binding proteins in its lumen, including calreticulin. In other eukaryotes, calreticulin plays an important role in regulating the activity of ER Ca2+ fluxes. In this issue, Persson et al. (pp. 1092-1104) report that the perturbation of calreticulin levels affects ER Ca2+ in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) suspension cells and Arabidopsis plants. Calreticulin levels were selectively modulated by means of a heat shock-inducible promoter coupled to maize (Zea mays) calreticulin cDNA. Heat shock-induced production of calreticulin led to a significant increase in the accumulation of Ca2+ in ER-enriched vesicles from tobacco cells. Overexpression of calreticulin in intact Arabidopsis plants was also found to enhance the tolerance of the plants to Ca2+-deficient conditions. The evidence presented supports the hypothesis that ERCa2+ is involved in maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis in plant cells and that calreticulin plays a major role in the ability of the ER to sequester Ca2+.


    Cholesterol Oxidase and the Control of Boll Weevils
TOP
On the Scent of...
Calreticulin and Ca2+...
Cholesterol Oxidase and the...
Double-Stranded RNA and RNA...
A Triple Mutant That...
Engineered Resistance to Sulfur...

The cotton boll weevil (Anthomus grandis grandis) is particularly difficult to control because its larvae feed and develop while safely sheltered from chemical sprays within the immature flower buds or fruit (bolls) of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Cholesterol oxidase is a bacterial enzyme that has potent insecticidal activity against cotton boll weevils. Upon ingestion, this protein causes developmental arrest and death of boll weevil larvae and a decrease in the fecundity of adult female weevils. Unlike the delta -endotoxin insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis, which have no known enzyme activity, cholesterol oxidase is an insecticidal protein that has well-known enzymatic properties. Because cholesterol oxidase can oxidize many plant sterols, including sitosterol, stigmasterol, and campesterol, the production of foreign cholesterol oxidase in plant cells could potentially result in the oxidation of plant sterols and have detrimental effects on plant growth and development. In this issue, Corbin et al. (pp. 1116-1128) transformed tobacco plants with the cholesterol oxidase ChoM gene. Plants that were engineered to express ChoM cytosolically demonstrated severe developmental abnormalities, including a failure to produce floral buds. In contrast, plants that expressed ChoM from a chloroplast-targeted vector were developmentally normal (Fig. 2). In addition to its obvious applied interest, this study also provides insights into the function of phytosterols in plants.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Non-targeted expression of boll weevil-killing cholesterol oxidase prevents flowering (left), whereas chloroplast-targeted expression yields normal-looking plants (right; control, middle).


    Double-Stranded RNA and RNA Silencing
TOP
On the Scent of...
Calreticulin and Ca2+...
Cholesterol Oxidase and the...
Double-Stranded RNA and RNA...
A Triple Mutant That...
Engineered Resistance to Sulfur...

One of the major mechanisms that plants use to combat invading viruses is RNA silencing. As a result of this process, the mRNAs of invading viruses are recognized and degraded in a sequence-specific manner. A key step in RNA silencing is the formation of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). In the case of most plant viruses, dsRNA is formed during genome replication, and this may explain why viruses are often potent inducers of RNA silencing. Unfortunately, plants also employ this same defense in response to transfection by foreign RNA. This limits the applicability of techniques such as the Agrobacterium tumefaciens delivery system for continuously expressing foreign DNA in plant cells. For example, under the control of the potent 35S promoter, the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) is subject to RNA silencing after an initial burst of gene expression in Nicotiana benthamiana cells. In this issue, Johansen and Carrington (pp. 930-938) report on the effects of an artificial dsRNA construct on RNA silencing in N. benthamiana. The dsRNA construct was made from a 35S-GFP/antisense GFP gene containing the full-length GFP coding sequence, an intron, and a full-length GFP sequence in the inverted orientation. Transcription of this gene and RNA processing yields an intron-spliced hairpin RNA referred to as double-stranded GFP (dsGFP) RNA. When leaves of N. benthamiana were infiltrated with cultures of Agrobacterium containing a vector harboring both the GFP and dsGFP constructs, GFP fluorescence was abolished. Viruses, however, have evolved mechanisms to circumvent RNA silencing. For example, the tobacco etch virus RNA silencing suppressor P1/HC-Pro has been found to suppress RNA silencing. In contrast to the lack of GFP fluorescence in tissues injected with mixtures of Agrobacterium containing GFP plus dsGFP genes, tissues infiltrated with the triple mixture containing GFP, dsGFP, and P1/HC-Pro genes exhibited bright green fluorescence. The authors propose that P1/HC-Pro may potentially suppress the RNA silencing of other constructs and result in the maintenance of high expression for extended periods. This will greatly enhance the efficiency of the Agrobacterium delivery system to introduce foreign genes into leaf tissue, and to interpret the effects of their continued expression on metabolism.


    A Triple Mutant That Doesn't Flower Unless Vernalized
TOP
On the Scent of...
Calreticulin and Ca2+...
Cholesterol Oxidase and the...
Double-Stranded RNA and RNA...
A Triple Mutant That...
Engineered Resistance to Sulfur...

Many mutations that delay the flowering of Arabidopsis have been isolated, but none of them prevent flowering under all conditions. Genetic and physiological analyses have led to the idea that there are three independent pathways that promote flowering---the long-day, autonomous, and gibberellin (GA)-dependent pathways. Mutations affecting the long-day pathway delay flowering under long but not short days, whereas mutations affecting the autonomous pathway delay flowering irrespective of photoperiod. Mutations affecting GA synthesis delay flowering under long and short days, but have their strongest effect under short days. In this issue, Reeves and Coupland (pp. 1085-1091) describe a triple mutant in which the activities of the long-day, autonomous, and GA-dependent pathways are impaired. These flowers do not flower under long or short days. Only after the plants have been vernalized by extended exposure to low temperatures after germination do they flower. This finding suggests that vernalization-induced flowering probably employs a fourth pathway different from those described above. The triple mutant can also be used for comparison purposes in experiments comparing the time to flowering in double mutants in which only one pathway is active. Studies of such double mutants revealed that under long photoperiods, the long-day pathway promoted flowering most effectively, whereas under short periods the GA pathway had the strongest effect. The autonomous pathway had a weak effect when acting alone under either photoperiod but appeared to play a role in facilitating the promotion of flowering by the other two pathways.


    Engineered Resistance to Sulfur Pollutants
TOP
On the Scent of...
Calreticulin and Ca2+...
Cholesterol Oxidase and the...
Double-Stranded RNA and RNA...
A Triple Mutant That...
Engineered Resistance to Sulfur...

Pollution by sulfur-containing compounds, particularly gaseous SO2, is a major environmental problem. In the case of plants, the most common symptoms of SO2 toxicity are leaf chlorosis and necrosis. Although sulfur-containing compounds such as SO2 are toxic to plants at high concentrations, sulfur is also an essential nutrient for plants. Inorganic sulfur is assimilated into plants by the Cys biosynthetic pathway. In this issue, Noji et al. (pp. 973-980) explore the possibility of genetically manipulating the Cys biosynthetic pathway as a means to confer tolerance to sulfur-containing pollutants. The final step in Cys biosynthesis is the joining of sulfide with O-acetyl-L-Ser in a reaction catalyzed by Cys synthase, an enzyme found mostly in the cytoplasm and the chloroplasts. The authors constructed two transgenic tobacco lines with enhanced expression of Cys synthase in the cytosol and the chloroplast, respectively. As anticipated, the F1 progeny of these two transgenic lines were highly tolerant to SO2 and underwent an increase in Cys titer in response to fumigation with SO2.

Peter V. Minorsky

Department of Biology
Vassar College
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604

© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Plant Biologists