Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorimer;, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorimer;, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lorimer;, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, C.

Plant Physiol, September 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 3-3

LETTER TO THE EDITOR


    LETTER

Dear Editor:

Chris Somerville must surely have been into his third bottle of Silicon Valley Cabernet Carnegie when he penned his recent account "An Early Arabidopsis Demonstration Resolving a Few Issues Concerning Photorespiration" (Somerville, 2001). In a more sober moment he might not have written: "About a year after the oxygenase paper was published, George Lorimer, a student of Ed Tolbert's at the time, reportedly burst into Ogren's office with an armful of O2 electrode tracings from failed attempts to measure RuBP oxygenase activity and dumped them on Ogren's desk with the words, `It doesn't work'." That sentence contains only one true statement---I was a student of Ed Tolbert. The remainder is pure fiction.

"About a year after the oxygenase paper was published... George Lorimer burst into Ogren's office." The Bowes et al. paper (Bowes et al., 1971) showing the formation of phosphoglycolate from ribulose bisphosphate by a preparation of carboxylase was published in November 1971. By November 1972, I had been a postdoctoral associate of Birgit Vennesland in Berlin for 8 months, 5,000 miles from Urbana, XX.

"... an armful of O2 electrode tracings... " It is unfortunate that the Tolbert lab did not then possess an O2 electrode with which to make such tracings. John Andrews and I followed the uptake of oxygen manometrically (Andrews et al., 1973). We confirmed the identity of the reaction products using [14C] ribulose bisphosphate and by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of the trimethylsilyl derivatives of phosphogycolate and phosphoglycerate (Lorimer et al., 1973). John Andrews returned to Australia and, with Murray Badger, was the first to use an O2 electrode to follow the oxygenase reaction (Bowes et al., 1971).

"It doesn't work." John Andrews and I had no difficulty whatsoever demonstrating the oxygenation of ribulose bisphosphate. By the time the Bowes et al. paper appeared in November 1971, we had more or less completed the work that was published 13 months later (Andrews et al., 1973; Lorimer et al., 1973). Several investigators did experience some difficulties demonstrating the oxygenase reaction in the year or two thereafter. In their zeal to exclude CO2 from the oxygenase reaction mixture, they inadvertently removed the activating CO2. When the activating effects of pre-incubating the enzyme with CO2 and Mg (discovered in University of California [Berkeley] in 1963 [Pon et al., 1963], not in Urbana in 1975 [Lorimer and Andrews, 1973]) were realized, no further difficulties were encountered (Lorimer et al., 1976, 1977).

So I don't admit to ever saying, "It doesn't work," but I do admit to arguing (Lorimer and Andrews, 1973) repeatedly with innumerable, starry-eyed molecular geneticists, who dreamed, perhaps over café au lait in Paris, of genetically selecting an oxygenase-less Rubisco. Thirty years on, not to speak of 2 billion years of evolution, a less ardent geneticist might have grudgingly admitted that that particular Parisian fantasy has come to naught.

    LITERATURE CITED

George Lorimer

    LETTER

Dear Editor:

All I can add to George Lorimer's letter concerning my recent article is my apology. It was thoughtless stupidity on my part to relay an anecdote that I had heard 20 years before and about which I had no personal knowledge and an imperfect recollection. I find it incomprehensible that I submitted the article without asking George whether the story had any basis in fact. I have been a friend and admirer of George's for 20 years and did not intend to misrepresent his contributions. Rather, I was trying to convey a sense of the passion with which he and others pursued the scientific problems associated with photorespiration 30 years ago.

Chris Somerville

© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorimer;, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorimer;, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lorimer;, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Plant Biologists