Plant Physiol, December 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 1466-1475

UPDATE ON SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
Signal Transduction in Maize and Arabidopsis Mesophyll Protoplasts¹

Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Wellman 11, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

Plant protoplasts show physiological perceptions and responses to hormones, metabolites, environmental cues, and pathogen-derived elicitors, similar to cell-autonomous responses in intact tissues and plants. The development of defined protoplast transient expression systems for high-throughput screening and systematic characterization of gene functions has greatly contributed to elucidating plant signal transduction pathways, in combination with genetic, genomic, and transgenic approaches.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

The availability of mutants, transgenic plants, global gene expression profiles, and genomic sequences has offered invaluable opportunities in understanding organismal plant biology at the cellular and molecular level (Gai et al., 2000; Genome, 2000; Parinov and Sundaresan, 2000; Richmond and Somerville, 2000; Sussman et al., 2000; Walbot, 2000; Zhu and Wang, 2000). Notably, molecular and genetic studies have discovered central components from receptors to transcription factors in diverse plant signal transduction pathways (Bleecker and Kende, 2000; Gray and Estelle, 2000; McCarty and Chory, 2000; Urao et al., 2000; Dangl and Jones, 2001; Inoue et al., 2001; Schroeder et al., 2001; Tena et al., 2001; Zhu, 2001). Still, many missing links exist in the plant transduction pathways from signals to target genes.

Analogous to the mammalian tissue culture lines and transient gene expression assays that are indispensable for the rapid progress in discoveries of signal transduction pathways in multicellular organisms, protoplast transient expression systems using parsley (Petroselinum crispum), maize (Zea mays), carrot (Daucus carota), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), Arabidopsis, and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) suspension culture cells have been established. These plant cell lines offer new opportunities to dissect signal transduction pathways involved in UV (Lipphardt et al., 1988), abscisic acid (ABA; Vasil et al., 1989), metabolite (Loake et al., 1991), ribosomal RNA (Doelling and Pikaard, 1993), light (Frohnmeyer et al., 1994; Harter et al., 1994), auxin (Liu et al., 1994), defense (Nurnberger et al., 1994), and cell cycle regulation (Evans and Bravo, 1983; Nagata et al., 1992; Ito et al., 2001). Compared with cell culture lines, the use of fresh tissues as protoplast sources offers unique advantages. For example, protoplasts isolated from plant tissues retain their cell identity and differentiated state; they show high transformation efficiency with low maintenance. These freshly isolated protoplasts have proven to be physiological and versatile cell systems for studying a broad spectrum of plant signaling mechanisms underlying phytochrome, clock (Kim et al., 1993), auxin (Abel and Theologis, 1996), gibberellin (GA; Gubler et al., 1999), light, sugar, stress, auxin, hydrogen peroxide (Sheen, 1999; Tena et al., 2001), membrane transport (Maathuis et al., 1997; Bauer et al., 2000; Hamilton et al., 2000; Schroeder et al., 2001), ABA (Uno et al., 2000), cytokinin (Hwang and Sheen, 2001), and cell death (Asai et al., 2000; Bethke and Jones, 2001) controls. With advances made in novel protoplast assays, taking full advantage of the completed plant genome sequences for functional genomic and proteomic analyses of individual plant genes and their products will become a reality.

	A BRIEF HISTORY OF PROTOPLAST TRANSIENT EXPRESSION SYSTEMS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

Forty years ago, Cocking published the first paper describing a method for the isolation of plant protoplasts (Cocking, 1960). A decade later, the first successful experiment for the introduction of nucleic acid into protoplasts was accomplished by Aoki and Takebe using tobacco mesophyll protoplasts and tobacco mosaic virus RNA (Aoki and Takebe, 1969). Although efficient methods for DNA transfection were not yet available, protoplasts were already a useful tool for investigating cell wall regeneration, cell division, embryogenesis, and differentiation (Kao et al., 1970; Nagata and Takebe, 1970; Takebe, 1971; Vasil and Vasil, 1972), as well as for plant virus research (Zaitlin and Beachy, 1974). Subsequently, protoplasts were isolated from diverse tissues and plants, and shown to retain physiological activities and regulation. For example, freshly isolated mesophyll protoplasts perform active photosynthesis and respiration (Edwards et al., 1970; Kanai and Edwards, 1973; Podibelkowska et al., 1975). In barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone protoplasts, the endogenous -amylase gene is regulated by ABA and GA in parallel to what is observed in seeds (Jacobsen and Beach, 1985). In broadbean (Vicia faba) guard cell protoplasts, H⁺ ATPase is activated by blue light (Assmann et al., 1985). Protoplasts also retain cell membrane potentials similar to intact cells and have served as a model system to study membrane transporters. In particular, patch clamping of protoplasts is routinely used to study ion channels and their regulation by light, stress, or hormones (Moran et al., 1984; Schroeder et al., 1984, 2001; Maathuis and Sanders, 1994; Cho and Spalding, 1996; Bauer et al., 2000; Downey et al., 2000; Hamilton et al., 2000). Furthermore, protoplasts are frequently used to analyze calcium signals and regulation in plant cells (Gilroy and Jones, 1992; Trewavas, 1999; Pauly et al., 2000).

The development and improvement of protoplast transformation methods with plasmid DNA by polyethylene glycol (PEG; Krens et al., 1982; Potrykus et al., 1985; Negrutiu et al., 1987), electroporation (Fromm et al., 1985; Nishiguchi et al., 1986; Ou-Lee et al., 1986; Hauptmann et al., 1987; Jones et al., 1989), and microinjection (Hillmer et al., 1992) set the foundation to use protoplasts to study gene regulation and signal transduction in plant cells. The establishment of new, and more economical, convenient and sensitive reporter gene assays for -glucuronidase (GUS; Jefferson et al., 1987), chloramphenicol acyltransferase (Seed and Sheen, 1988), LUC (firefly luciferase; Luehrsen et al., 1992) and later green fluorescent protein (GFP; Sheen et al., 1995; Chiu et al., 1996) for plant cells has also facilitated the application of protoplast transient expression systems.

Following the establishment of the basic technologies, the first demonstrations that plasmid DNA constructs carrying chimeric reporter genes can be regulated by specific signals in transiently transformed protoplasts were reported. These early examples include the ABA-responsive Em promoter in rice (Oryza sativa) protoplasts (Marcotte Jr. et al., 1988), the UV-inducible chalcone synthase (CHS) promoter and elicitor-responsive pathogenesis-related (PR2) promoter in parsley protoplasts (Lipphardt et al., 1988; van de Locht et al., 1990), the GA-regulated -amylase gene promoter in oat (Avena sativa) and barley aleurone protoplasts (Huttley and Baulcombe, 1989; Gopalakrishnan et al., 1991; Jacobsen and Close, 1991), the p-coumaric acid-activated CHS promoter in alfalfa protoplasts (Loake et al., 1991), several tissue-specific promoters in tobacco and maize protoplasts (Harkins et al., 1990; Schaeffner and Sheen, 1991, 1992; Sheen, 1991), the feedback control of the shrunken (Sh) promoter in maize protoplasts (Mass et al., 1990), and light and metabolic regulation of seven photosynthetic gene promoters in maize mesophyll protoplasts (Sheen, 1990).

In the past decade, a few laboratories have employed protoplast transient expression to dissect the functions of cis-elements and trans-factors in many essential processes and signaling pathways. These significant studies have unraveled the control mechanisms of RNA transcription, splicing, transport, and translation in maize and tobacco protoplasts (Callis et al., 1987; Gallie et al., 1987, 1989; Goodall and Filipowicz, 1989; Waibel and Filipowicz, 1990; Doelling and Pikaard, 1995; Gallie and Bailey-Serres, 1997); the involvement of VP1, MYB, and bZIP factors in ABA and GA signaling in maize, barley, and Arabidopsis protoplasts (McCarty et al., 1991; Hattori et al., 1992; Kao et al., 1996; Urao et al., 1996; Gubler et al., 1999; Uno et al., 2000); the function of promoters and AUX/IAA proteins and auxin-response factors in auxin signaling in tobacco, pea (Pisum sativum), carrot, and Arabidopsis protoplasts (Ballas et al., 1993; Abel and Theologis, 1994, 1996; Ulmasov et al., 1997a, 1999; Guilfoyle et al., 1998), the elicitor- and WRKY factor-mediated transcription regulation in parsley protoplasts (Eulgem et al., 1999), and the important cis-elements and transcription factors for light, phosphate, sugar, and cell cycle regulation in maize, parsley, and tobacco protoplasts (Sheen, 1990, 1993; Frohnmeyer et al., 1994; Graham et al., 1994; Sadka et al., 1994; Ni et al., 1996; Yanagisawa and Sheen, 1998; Ito et al., 2001). Recently, tobacco, maize, potato (Solanum tuberosum), and Arabidopsis protoplast transient expression assays have also been used to study protein stability control (Worley et al., 2000), retrotransposon regulation (Pouteau et al., 1991; Takeda et al., 1999), protein targeting and trafficking (Chang et al., 1999; Kleiner et al., 1999; Nimchuk et al., 2000; Jin et al., 2001; Ueda et al., 2001), cell death (Asai et al., 2000), virus movement proteins (Heinlein et al., 1995; McLean et al., 1995; Huang et al., 2000), resistance gene product (Leister and Katagiri, 2000), heat shock proteins and factors (Czarnecka-Verner et al., 2000; Kirschner et al., 2000), protein-protein interactions (Subramaniam et al., 2001), and stress and hormone signaling (Sheen, 1996, 1998; Kovtun et al., 1998, 2000; Hwang and Sheen, 2001; Tena et al., 2001). It is anticipated that more protoplast assays will be developed to dissect a variety of plant signal transduction pathways.

	ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF MESOPHYLL PROTOPLAST TRANSIENT EXPRESSION SYSTEMS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

Much can be learned about gene function and regulation in transient assays. Isolated mesophyll protoplasts usually represent active and homogeneous cell populations (Fig. 1) that are amenable for synchronous pharmacological and biochemical treatments, the analysis of early and transient responses, and most importantly for DNA transformation. Recent extensive effort in the generation of Arabidopsis knockouts has revealed that the majority of single gene mutants lack overt phenotypes (Bouche and Bouchez, 2001), suggesting the functional redundancy of plant genes under common growth conditions. Protoplast transient expression assays can be used for high-throughput screening of candidate genes even for closely related members of gene families (Sheen, 1996, 1998; Kovtun et al., 2000; Cheng et al., 2001; Tena et al., 2001). Constitutively active and dominant-negative mutants can be rationally created and tested (Tena et al., 2001). The use of epitope and GFP tags enables gene products to be more easily followed and studied in transiently transformed plant cells (Fig. 2; Chiu et al., 1996; Sheen, 1996). Although generating transgenic plants is no longer a formidable task for Arabidopsis (Clough and Bent, 1998), the unpredictable nature of transgene expression and phenotypes still requires major effort, thus limiting the number of genes and constructs that can be analyzed simultaneously. The transient nature of the protoplast assay can also circumvent the difficulty in analyzing genes that cause lethality when deleted or overexpressed in plants. In combination with the increasingly available information on global gene expression patterns (Richmond and Somerville, 2000; Zhu and Wang, 2000), transient assay results can facilitate design of more precise and productive experiments using transgenic and mutant plants.

View larger version (123K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1.   Viability of Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Arabidopsis leaves were digested with cellulase and macerozyme for 3 h at room temperature. A homogeneous population of mesophyll protoplasts was released and observed under bright field (left) or with a FITC filter to show viable cells stained with a vital dye fluorescein diacetate (right). The purity or viability of the mesophyll protoplasts is usually >95% without gradient purification. Scale bar = 35 µm.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2.   High transfection efficiency of Arabidopsis and maize mesophyll protoplasts. Arabidopsis protoplasts were transiently transformed by the PEG method. Maize protoplasts were transiently transformed by electroporation. A cytosolic GFP marker was used to visualize the transformation efficiency. The mesophyll protoplasts showing only red chlorophyll autofluorescence are untransformed. The transformed cells appear yellow, orange, and/or green. The transformation efficiency is 90% for Arabidopsis protoplasts and 40% for maize protoplasts. Scale bar = 35 µm (Arabidopsis) and 25 µm (maize).

Because many plant signal transduction pathways are active in mesophyll cells, conserved aspects of plant signaling mechanisms can be established using these cells. The signal transduction pathways found in mesophyll cells can potentially be generalized to other cell types, e.g. root and meristem cells, with the addition of cell type-specific components and/or the use of genes with homologous functions but distinct expression patterns (Hwang and Sheen, 2001). Recent studies have shown that a conserved two-component cytokinin signaling pathway established in mesophyll protoplasts is also active in the root and in shoot meristematic cells (Hwang and Sheen, 2001; Inoue et al., 2001).

Mesophyll protoplasts isolated from fresh leaves have many practical advantages. For example, plant materials are grown from seeds that are genetically stable and more easily stored without subculturing and without needing a sterile tissue culture facility. Non-sterile and differentiated cells are abundant and accessible. Fast and simple procedures have been established to obtain homogeneous, active, and responsive mesophyll protoplasts (Fig. 1) with high transformation efficiency (Fig. 2). The transformation efficiency of Arabidopsis and maize mesophyll protoplasts can reach 90% (Fig. 2) and 75%, respectively (J. Sheen, unpublished data), and cotransfection of multiple plasmids expressing different constructs is very efficient (Abel and Theologis, 1994; Kovtun et al., 1998; Sheen, 1998). Compared with biolistic transient assays that are less effective, this high level of transformation efficiency enables broader functional analyses of protein products of transgenes in protoplast transient assays. Mesophyll protoplasts can also be isolated from maize and Arabidopsis mutants for cellular and biochemical analysis in transient assays (L. Zhou and J. Sheen, unpublished data; Asai et al., 2000; Uno et al., 2000).

Despite many advantages, conceivable limitations of protoplast transient expression systems also exist. First of all, it is presently not possible to isolate active protoplasts from each plant cell type or from all growth conditions (Power and Chapman, 1985). For example, etiolated true leaves grown in the dark can be obtained from wild-type monocot plants such as maize and barley, but not commonly from dicot plants such as Arabidopsis and tobacco. Currently, etiolated or greening maize leaves provide the best source of mesophyll protoplasts to study synchronous light and sugar regulation of photosynthetic genes (Sheen, 1990, 1991, 1993; Schaeffner and Sheen, 1991, 1992; Jang and Sheen, 1994; Yanagisawa and Sheen, 1998). Establishment of new physiological assays is empirical and can be time-consuming. In the case of transgene overexpression, interpretation of the results must be cautious. Cell walls, plasmodesmata, and cell-cell interactions are lost or interrupted. However, with an optimal supply of nutrients and hormones, Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts can actually be used as "stem cells" and the starting point to study cell wall regeneration, cell proliferation, cell-cell communication, embryogenesis, and differentiation (Damm et al., 1989; Masson and Paszkowski, 1992; Wenck and Marton, 1995; Luo and Koop, 1997; Mordhorst et al., 1998).

	MISCONCEPTIONS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

Although protoplast transient expression assays appear to be simple and straightforward, proficiency requires training, lots of patience, creativity, determination, and a "feeling" for the organism. Because protoplast isolation requires enzymatic removal of the cell wall, there is the mistaken impression that protoplasts are irreversibly wounded and thus are stressed and dying cells. When properly isolated and maintained, protoplasts retain their original biochemical and cellular activities. Based on vital staining with fluorescein diacetate (Larkin, 1976) or Evans blue (Asai et al., 2000), the viability of freshly isolated intact maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts is greater than 95% (Fig. 1) for more than 48 h in simple mannitol solution. Most transient assays can be carried out within 12 h after isolation. In fact, Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were used recently as an experimental system to study a specific cell death program induced by fumonisin B1 toxin (Asai et al., 2000). Barley aleurone protoplasts are conducive to study cell death program mediated by reactive oxygen species (Bethke and Jones, 2001). The best evidence against the perception that protoplasts are highly stressed and not suitable for studying signaling is the demonstration that maize and Arabidopsis protoplasts respond to oxidative, heat, and osmotic stress signals and pathogen-derived elicitors as do cells in intact plants (Nurnberger et al., 1994; Sheen, 1996; Kovtun et al., 1998, 2000; Eulgem et al., 1999; Tena et al., 2001). Thus, the "stress" status of mesophyll protoplasts can be quantified using stress-inducible genes. If protoplasts are truly stressed and dying, the general gene expression program is shut down (Asai et al., 2000; J. Sheen, unpublished data). Furthermore, the functionality of plasma membrane proteins in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts has been demonstrated by the detection of cell surface receptor activities for cytokinin and for a peptide elicitor (Hwang and Sheen, 2001; Tena et al., 2001).

For successful and reproducible results, great care should be taken in establishing plant growth conditions (Power and Chapman, 1985; Masson and Paszkowski, 1992), monitoring leaf morphology, age and development, isolating protoplasts, and in testing and comparing various physiological responses between transgenes in protoplasts and endogenous genes in protoplasts and intact plants. Homogeneous populations (>95%) of mesophyll protoplasts are routinely obtained; purity can be easily confirmed by microscopic observation (Fig. 1; Sheen, 1995). Other leaf cell types are generally not released using the established procedure for mesophyll protoplast isolation (Sheen, 1995). Other experimental conditions such as plasmid DNA purity, DNA to protoplast ratio, and protoplast culture density need to be optimized. The method of choice for DNA transfection needs to be tested empirically. For instance, electroporation for maize mesophyll protoplasts and PEG transfection for Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts work well (Fig. 2; Sheen, 1990, 1991; Kovtun et al., 2000; Hwang and Sheen, 2001). For each transfection sample, 100 times fewer protoplasts than previously established (10^6-7) gives optimal gene expression based on the activity of constitutive 35S and ubiquitin promoters (J. Sheen, unpublished data). Depending on the nature of transient expression analysis, one million mesophyll protoplasts could be used for 100 or more transfections and/or assays, a substantial efficiency improvement if plant material is limited. The activities of single cells can also be easily monitored and visualized by vital markers, such as GFP and LUC (Chiu et al., 1996; Sheen, 1996; Kovtun et al., 1998; Yanagisawa and Sheen, 1998; Hwang and Sheen, 2001; Zhu, 2001). Although responses in transient expression assays can be monitored as early as 1 to 2 h after DNA transfection, optimal assay conditions need to be established experimentally. In general, protoplast transient expression analysis is intensive and demanding but enormously rewarding.

	DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

The best demonstration of the fitness of the protoplast transient expression systems for discovering and dissecting plant signal transduction pathways is to provide successful examples (Fig. 3). These studies support the idea that key regulators of plant signaling transduction pathways are conserved in dicots and monocots, and justify the use of model plants such as maize and Arabidopsis. For instance, the discovery of the global sugar repression of photosynthetic gene promoters in maize mesophyll protoplasts is now supported by studies in diverse plant species (Sheen, 1990; Sheen et al., 1999). The proposed role of hexokinase as a sugar sensor based on maize protoplast transient expression analysis is also validated by transgenic plant studies (Jang et al., 1997; Dai et al., 1999) and by the isolation of hexokinase mutants displaying Glc insensitivity in Arabidopsis (Sheen et al., 1999). The negative role of ABA insensitive protein (ABI1) and the redundancy of protein phosphatase 2C (PP2Cs) in ABA signaling revealed by transient expression analysis in maize mesophyll protoplasts (Sheen, 1998) have been confirmed by the isolation of Arabidopsis abi1 null mutants (Gosti et al., 1999) and by studies in a rice protoplast assay (Hagenbeek et al., 2000).

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3.   Protoplast transient expression assays. Arabidopsis and maize mesophyll protoplasts are versatile systems for the elucidation of protein activities and functions in plant signal transduction pathways. Diverse signal responses have been detected in mesophyll protoplasts based on analyses of reporter gene expression. The nucleus of the Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast is revealed by a nuclear GFP marker. Chloroplasts show red chlorophyll autofluorescence. Flg22, 22-amino acid peptide elicitor derived from pathogenic bacterial flagellin; PKs, protein kinases; PPs, protein phosphatases; TFs, transcription factors. UBQ, a constitutive ubiquitin promoter.

Protoplast transient expression analysis has been used for intensive studies of auxin regulated gene expression in diverse plants (Ballas et al., 1993; Abel and Theologis, 1996; Guilfoyle et al., 1998; Ulmasov et al., 1999). A soybean (Glycine max) GH3 promoter exhibits similar auxin induction in tobacco, carrot, maize and Arabidopsis protoplasts, suggesting conservation in auxin signaling (Liu et al., 1994; Guilfoyle et al., 1998; Kovtun et al., 1998, 2000). Recent characterization of Arabidopsis auxin signaling mutants (Gray and Estelle, 2000) supports the physiological functions of AUX/IAA proteins and auxin-response factors first discovered in protoplast transient expression assays (Abel and Theologis, 1996; Ulmasov et al., 1997a, 1997b; Guilfoyle et al., 1998; Ulmasov et al., 1999). The alternation of IAA17/AXR3 mutant protein stability has also been demonstrated using a protoplast transient assay (Worley et al., 2000). Mesophyll protoplasts have been isolated from Arabidopsis mutants (jar1, etr1, pad4, npr1, acd2, cpr1, and cpr6) and transgenic plants (NahG) to investigate fumonisin B1-induced cell death program that requires ethylene, salicylate, and jasmonate signaling pathways (Asai et al., 2000). The activity of an ABA-regulated reporter gene in a protoplast transient expression assay has been shown to be repressed in the ABA insensitive mutants, abi1 and abi2, but greatly enhanced in the ABA hypersensitive mutant era1 (Uno et al., 2000). Recently, the use of the maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast transient expression assays has allowed functional analysis of the MAPK signaling cascades involved in oxidative stress, auxin, and defense signaling pathways (Kovtun et al., 1998; Kovtun et al., 2000; Tena et al., 2001). Finally, we have established a quantitative and specific protoplast assay based on cytokinin early response gene transcription (D'Agostino et al., 2000; Hwang and Sheen, 2001). Using this novel system, we have identified a two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction consisting of four major steps: His protein kinase receptor sensing and signaling, phosphotransmitter nuclear translocation, response regulator-dependent transcription activation, and a negative feedback loop through cytokinin-inducible genes encoding a distinct class of response regulators (Hwang and Sheen, 2001). Analyses of transgenic tissues and plants support the importance of this central signaling pathway in diverse cytokinin responses. This protoplast-based analysis is consistent with genetic characterization of Arabidopsis cytokinin mutants cki1 and cre1 (Kakimoto, 1996; Hwang and Sheen, 2001; Inoue et al., 2001) and with cytokinin-inducible gene regulation in wild-type and transgenic plants (D'Agostino et al., 2000).

The development of various protoplast transient expression assays has broadened the methodology for plant signaling pathway analyses to include biochemical, cellular, genomics, genetic, and transgenic tools. In most cases, discoveries made in protoplasts and conclusions derived from transient expression assays have been supported by transgenic plant studies and/or the isolation and characterization of relevant mutants. It will be possible to use protoplasts isolated from mutants for gene cloning by functional complementation with appropriate transient assays.

	FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

Powerful and versatile cell systems using mesophyll protoplasts isolated from fresh leaves of maize and Arabidopsis have been developed. These protoplast transient expression systems show regulated gene expression in response to internal and external signals and allow efficient and penetrating analysis of molecular mechanisms underlying hormone, sugar, stress, and defense signaling (Fig. 3). The use of a combination of tools and diverse resources in the protoplast system offers unprecedented opportunities to answer questions in plant physiology and development. Similar protoplast systems could also be developed using tobacco, barley, wheat (Triticum aestivum), and rice mesophyll protoplasts (J. Sheen, unpublished). The applications of protoplast transient expression systems will continue to contribute to the elucidation of intracellular signaling mechanisms in plants. Observation, imagination, creativity, and commitment are necessary for making discoveries using the protoplast assays. In the model plant Arabidopsis, extensive genetic analyses, genomic sequences, and global gene expression profiles offer a wealth of information to test signal transduction mechanisms in the protoplast transient expression assays (Fig. 3). The conclusions derived from single cell studies can then be readily confirmed using transgenic plants and mutants. It is now possible to develop high-throughout protoplast transient assays for functional genomic and proteomic research, such as to screen for activities and functions of protein kinases, protein phosphatases, receptors, G proteins, and transcription factors (Chory and Wu, 2001; Hwang and Sheen, 2001; Tena et al., 2001), as well as protein kinase substrates (Cheng et al., 2001). Studies in protoplast systems can provide a framework for whole plant analysis of tissue- or cell type-specific pathways in knockout mutants and transgenic plants.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I apologize for overlooking work on plant protoplasts not cited in this review. I would like to thank Brandon Moore, Heven Sze, Virginia Walbot, and Natasha V. Raikhel for valuable discussion and comments on the review, and my past and present colleagues, Anton Schaeffner, Hai Huang, Jyun-Chyun Jang, Patricia Leon, Kin-Ing To, Wan-Ling Chiu, Weike Zeng, Helen Wang, Yelena Kovtun, Shu-Hua Cheng, Brandon Moore, Guillaume Tena, Tsuneaki Asai, Ildoo Hwang, Matthew Willmann, Filip Rolland, and Senthil Ramu, who took the adventure with me in testing and improving the maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast systems. The reporters 35S-CAT/LUC, AtUBQ10-GUS, ZmUBQ-GUS, and Actin-GUS were kindly provided by Virginia Walbot, Judy Callis, Peter Quail, and Ray Wu, respectively.

	FOOTNOTES

Received September 7, 2001; accepted September 24, 2001.

¹ This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, by the National Institutes of Health, and by Hoechst A.G.

^* E-mail sheen{at}molbio.mgh.harvard.edu; fax 617-726-6893.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010820.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION A BRIEF HISTORY OF... ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF... MISCONCEPTIONS DISCOVER AND DISSECT PLANT... FUTURE PERSPECTIVES LITERATURE CITED

• Abel S, Theologis A (1994) Transient transformation of Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts: a versatile experimental system to study gene expression. Plant J 5: 421-427[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Abel S, Theologis A (1996) Early genes and auxin action. Plant Physiol 111: 9-17[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Aoki S, Takebe I (1969) Infection of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts by tobacco mosaic virus ribonucleic acid. Virology 39: 439-448[Medline]
• Asai T, Stone JM, Head JE, Kovtun Y, Yorgey P, Sheen J, Ausubel FM (2000) Fumonisin B1-induced cell death in Arabidopsis protoplasts requires jasmonate-, ethylene, and salicylate-dependent signaling pathways. Plant Cell 12: 1823-1835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Assmann SM, Simoncini L, Schroeder JI (1985) Blue light activates electrogenic ion pumping in guard cell protoplasts of Vicia faba. Nature 318: 285-287[CrossRef]
• Ballas N, Wong LM, Theologis A (1993) Identification of the auxin-responsive element, AuxRE, in the primary indoleacetic acid-inducible gene, PS-IAA4/5, of pea (Pisum sativum). J Mol Biol 233: 580-596[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Bauer CS, Hoth S, Haga K, Philippar K, Aoki N, Hedrich R (2000) Differential expression and regulation of K(+) channels in the maize coleoptile: molecular and biophysical analysis of cells isolated from cortex and vasculature. Plant J 24: 139-145[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Bethke PC, Jones RL (2001) Cell death of barley aleurone protoplasts is mediated by reactive oxygen species. Plant J 25: 19-29[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Bleecker AB, Kende H (2000) Ethylene: a gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16: 1-18[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Bouche N, Bouchez D (2001) Arabidopsis gene knockout: phenotype wanted. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4: 111-117[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Callis J, Fromm M, Walbot V (1987) Expression of mRNA electroporated into plant and animal cells. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 5823-5831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Chang C-C, Sheen J, Bligny M, Niwa Y, Lerbs-Mache S, Stern DB (1999) Functional analysis of two maize cDNAs encoding T7-like RNA polymerases. Plant Cell 11: 911-926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Cheng S-H, Sheen J, Gerrish C, Bolwell GP (2001) Molecular identification of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase as a substrate of a specific constitutively active Arabidopsis CDPK expressed in maize protoplasts. FEBS Lett 503: 185-188[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Chiu W-L, Niwa Y, Zeng W, Hirano T, Kobayashi H, Sheen J (1996) Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr Biol 6: 325-330[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Cho MH, Spalding EP (1996) An anion channel in Arabidopsis hypocotyls activated by blue light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 8134-8138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Chory J, Wu D (2001) Weaving the complex web of signal transduction. Plant Physiol 125: 77-80[Free Full Text]
• Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735-743[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Cocking EC (1960) A method for the isolation of plant protoplasts and vacuoles. Nature 187: 927-929
• Czarnecka-Verner E, Yuan CX, Scharf KD, Englich G, Gurley WB (2000) Plants contain a novel multi-member class of heat shock factors without transcriptional activator potential. Plant Mol Biol 43: 459-471[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• D'Agostino IB, Deruere J, Kieber JJ (2000) Characterization of the response of the Arabidopsis response regulator gene family to cytokinin. Plant Physiol 124: 1706-1717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Dai N, Schaffer A, Petreikov M, Shahak Y, Giller Y, Ratner K, Levine A, Granot D (1999) Overexpression of Arabidopsis hexokinase in tomato plants inhibits growth, reduces photosynthesis, and induces rapid senescence. Plant Cell 11: 177-189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Damm B, Schmidt R, Willmitzer L (1989) Efficient transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using direct gene transfer to protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 217: 6-12[CrossRef][Medline]
• Dangl JL, Jones JD (2001) Plant pathogens and integrated defense responses to infection. Nature 411: 826-833[CrossRef][Medline]
• Doelling JH, Pikaard CS (1993) Transient expression in Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts derived from rapidly established cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Rep 12: 241-244[Web of Science]
• Doelling JH, Pikaard CS (1995) The minimal ribosomal RNA gene promoter of Arabidopsis thaliana includes a critical element at the transcription initiation site. Plant J 8: 683-692[CrossRef][Medline]
• Downey P, Szabo I, Ivashikina N, Negro A, Guzzo F, Ache P, Hedrich R, Terzi M, Schiavo FL (2000) KDC1, a novel carrot root hair K+ channel. Cloning, characterization, and expression in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 275: 39420-39426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Edwards GE, Lee SS, Chen TM, Black CC (1970) Carboxylation reactions and photosynthesis of carbon compounds in isolated mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 39: 389-395[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Schmelzer E, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE (1999) Early nuclear events in plant defense signalling: rapid gene activation by WRKY transcription factors. EMBO J 18: 4689-4699[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Evans DA, Bravo JE (1983) Plant protoplast isolation and culture. Int Rev Cytol Suppl 16: 33-53
• Frohnmeyer H, Hahlbrock K, Schafer E (1994) A light-responsive in vitro transcription system from evacuolated parsley protoplasts. Plant J 5: 437-449[CrossRef][Medline]
• Fromm M, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1985) Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 5824-5828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Gai X, Lal S, Xing L, Brendel V, Walbot V (2000) Gene discovery using the maize genome database ZmDB. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 94-96[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Gallie DR, Bailey-Serres J (1997) Eyes off transcription! The wonderful world of post-transcriptional regulation. Plant Cell 9: 667-673[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Gallie DR, Lucas WJ, Walbot V (1989) Visualizing mRNA expression in plant protoplasts: factors influencing efficient mRNA uptake and translation. Plant Cell 1: 301-311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Gallie DR, Sleat DE, Watts JW, Turner PC, Wilson TM (1987) A comparison of eukaryotic viral 5'-leader sequences as enhancers of mRNA expression in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 8693-8711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Genome AI (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815[CrossRef][Medline]
• Gilroy S, Jones RL (1992) Gibberellic acid and abscisic acid coordinately regulate cytoplasmic calcium and secretory activity in barley aleurone protoplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3591-3995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Goodall GJ, Filipowicz W (1989) The AU-rich sequences present in the introns of plant nuclear Pre-mRNAs are required for splicing. Cell 58: 473-483[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Gopalakrishnan B, Sonthayanon B, Ramatullah R, Muthukrishnan S (1991) Barley aleurone layer cell protoplasts as a transient expression system. Plant Mol Biol 16: 463-467[Medline]
• Gosti F, Beaudoin N, Serizet C, Webb AAR, Vartanian N, Giraudat J (1999) ABI1 protein phosphotase 2C is a negative regulator of ABA signaling. Plant Cell 11: 1897-1909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Graham IA, Baker CJ, Leaver CJ (1994) Analysis of the cucumber malate synthase gene promoter by transient expression and gel retardation assays. Plant J 6: 893-902[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Gray WM, Estelle M (2000) Function of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in auxin response. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 133-138[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Gubler F, Raventos D, Keys M, Watts R, Mundy J, Jacobsen JV (1999) Target genes and regulatory domains of the GAMYB transcriptional activator in cereal aleurone. Plant J 17: 1-9[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Guilfoyle T, Hagen G, Ulmasov T, Murfett J (1998) How does auxin turn on genes? Plant Physiol 118: 341-347[Free Full Text]
• Hagenbeek D, Quatrano RS, Rock CD (2000) Trivalent ions activate abscisic acid-inducible promoters through an ABI1-dependent pathway in rice protoplasts. Plant Physiol 123: 1553-1560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hamilton DW, Hills A, Kohler B, Blatt MR (2000) Ca²⁺ channels at the plasma membrane of stomatal guard cells are activated by hyperpolarization and abscisic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 4967-4972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Harkins KR, Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW, Galbraith DW (1990) Expression of photosynthesis-related gene fusions is restricted by cell type in transgenic plants and in transfected protoplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 816-820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Harter K, Frohnmeyer H, Kircher S, Kunkel T, Muhlbauer S, Schafer E (1994) Light induces rapid changes of the phosphorylation pattern in the cytosol of evacuolated parsley protoplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 5038-5042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hattori T, Vasil V, Rosenkrans L, Hannah LC, McCarty DR, Vasil IK (1992) The Viviparous-1 gene and abscisic acid activate the C1 regulatory gene for anthocyanin biosynthesis during seed maturation in maize. Genes Dev 6: 609-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hauptmann RM, Ozias-Akins P, Vasil V, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Vasil IK, Fraley RT (1987) Transient expression of electroporated DNA in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species. Plant Cell Rep 6: 265-270
• Heinlein M, Epel BL, Padgett HS, Beachy RN (1995) Interaction of tobamovirus movement proteins with the plant cytoskeleton. Science 270: 1983-1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hillmer S, Gilroy S, Jones RL (1992) Visualizing enzyme secretion from individual barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone protoplasts. Plant Physiol 102: 279-286[Abstract]
• Huang Z, Han Y, Howell SH (2000) Formation of surface tubules and fluorescent foci in Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts expressing a fusion between the green fluorescent protein and the cauliflower mosaic virus movement protein. Virology 271: 58-64[CrossRef][Medline]
• Huttley AK, Baulcombe DC (1989) A wheat -Amy-2 promoter is regulated by gibberellin in transformed oat aleurone protoplasts. EMBO J 8: 1907-1913[Web of Science][Medline]
• Hwang I, Sheen J (2001) Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature 413: 383-389[CrossRef][Medline]
• Inoue T, Higuchi M, Hashimoto Y, Seki M, Kobayashi M, Kato T, Tabata S, Shinozaki K, Kakimoto T (2001) Identification of CRE1 as a cytokinin receptor from Arabidopsis. Nature 409: 1060-1063[CrossRef][Medline]
• Ito M, Araki S, Matsunaga S, Itoh T, Nishihama R, Machida Y, Doonan JH, Watanabe A (2001) G2/M-phase-specific transcription during the plant cell cycle is mediated by c-Myb-like transcription factors. Plant Cell 13: 1891-1905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Jacobsen JV, Beach LR (1985) Control of transcription of -amylase and rRNA genes in barley aleurone protoplasts by gibberellin and abscisic acid. Nature 316: 275-277[CrossRef]
• Jacobsen JV, Close TJ (1991) Control of transient expression of chimeric genes by gibberellic acid and abscisic acid in protoplasts prepared from mature barley aleurone layers. Plant Mol Biol 16: 713-724[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Jang JC, Leon P, Zhou L, Sheen J (1997) Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell 9: 5-19[Abstract]
• Jang J-C, Sheen J (1994) Sugar sensing in higher plants. Plant Cell 6: 1665-1679[Abstract]
• Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6: 3901-3907[Web of Science][Medline]
• Jin JB, Kim YA, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Kim DH, Cheong GW, Hwang I (2001) A new dynamin-like protein, ADL6, is involved in trafficking from the trans-Golgi network to the central vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 1511-1526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Jones H, Ooms G, Jones MG (1989) Transient gene expression in electroporated Solanum protoplasts. Plant Mol Biol 13: 503-511[Medline]
• Kakimoto T (1996) CKI1, a histidine kinase homolog implicated in cytokinin signal transduction. Science 274: 982-985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kanai R, Edwards GE (1973) Separation of mesophyll protoplasts and bundle sheath cells from maize leaves for photosynthetic studies. Plant Physiol 51: 1133-1137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kao CY, Cocciolone SM, Vasil IK, McCarty DR (1996) Localization and interaction of the cis-acting elements for abscisic acid, VIVIPAROUS1, and light activation of the C1 gene of maize. Plant Cell 8: 1171-1179[Abstract]
• Kao KN, Keller WA, Miller RA (1970) Cell division in newly formed cells from protoplasts of soybean. Exp Cell Res 62: 338-340[Medline]
• Kim HY, Cote GG, Crain RC (1993) Potassium channels in Samanea saman protoplasts controlled by phtichrome and the biological clock. Science 260: 960-962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kirschner M, Winkelhaus S, Thierfelder JM, Nover L (2000) Transient expression and heat-stress-induced co-aggregation of endogenous and heterologous small heat-stress proteins in tobacco protoplasts. Plant J 24: 397-411[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Kleiner O, Kircher S, Harter K, Batschauer A (1999) Nuclear localization of the Arabidopsis blue light receptor cryptochrome. Plant J 19: 289-296[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Kovtun Y, Chiu W-L, Tena G, Sheen J (2000) Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated MAPK cascade in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 2940-2945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kovtun Y, Chiu W-L, Zeng W, Sheen J (1998) Suppression of auxin signal transduction by a MAPK cascade in higher plants. Nature 395: 716-720[CrossRef][Medline]
• Krens FA, Molendijk L, Wullems GJ, Schilperoot RA (1982) In vitro transformation of plant protoplasts with Ti-plasmid DNA. Nature 296: 72-74[CrossRef]
• Larkin PJ (1976) Purification and viability determination of plant protoplasts. Planta 128: 213-216[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Leister RT, Katagiri F (2000) A resistance gene product of the nucleotide binding siteleucine rich repeats class can form a complex with bacterial avirulence proteins in vivo. Plant J 22: 345-354[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Lipphardt S, Brettschneider R, Kreuzaler F, Schell J, Dangl JL (1988) UV-inducible transient expression in parsley protoplasts identifies regulatory cis-elements of a chimeric Antirrhinum majus chalcone synthase gene. EMBO J 7: 4027-4033[Web of Science][Medline]
• Liu ZB, Ulmasov T, Shi X, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ (1994) Soybean GH3 promoter contains multiple auxin-inducible elements. Plant Cell 6: 645-657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Loake GJ, Choudhary AD, Harrison MJ, Mavandad M, Lamb CJ, Dixon RA (1991) Phenylpropanoid pathway intermediates regulate transient expression of a chalcone synthase gene promoter. Plant Cell 3: 829-840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Luehrsen KR, de Wet JR, Walbot V (1992) Transient expression analysis in plants using firefly luciferase reporter gene. Methods Enzymol 216: 397-414[Web of Science][Medline]
• Luo Y, Koop HU (1997) Somatic embryogenesis in cultured immature zygotic embryos and leaf protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Planta 202: 387-396[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Maathuis FJ, Sanders D (1994) Mechanism of high-affinity potassium uptake in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 9272-9276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Maathuis JM, Taylor AR, Assmann SM, Sanders D (1997) Seal-promoting solutions and pipette perfusion for patch clamping plant cells. Plant J 11: 891-896[CrossRef][Medline]
• Marcotte WR Jr, Bayley CC, Quatrano RS (1988) Regulation of a wheat promoter by abscisic acid in rice protoplasts. Nature 335: 454-457[CrossRef]
• Mass C, Schaal S, Werr W (1990) A feedback control element near the transcription start site of the maize sucrose synthase gene determines promoter activity. EMBO J 11: 3447-3452
• Masson J, Paszkowski J (1992) The culture response of Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts is determined by the growth conditions of donor plants. Plant J 2: 829-833[Web of Science]
• McCarty DR, Chory J (2000) Conservation and innovation in plant signaling pathways. Cell 103: 201-209[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• McCarty DR, Hattori T, Carson CB, Vasil V, Lazar M, Vasil IK (1991) The Viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional activator. Cell 66: 895-905[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• McLean BG, Zupan J, Zambryski PC (1995) Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein associates with the cytoskeleton in tobacco cells. Plant Cell 7: 2101-2114[Abstract]
• Moran N, Ehrensten G, Iwasa K, Bare C, Mischke C (1984) Ion channels in plasmalemma of wheat protoplasts. Science 226: 835-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Mordhorst AP, Voerman KJ, Hartog MV, Meijer EA, van Went J, Koornneef M, de Vries SC (1998) Somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana is facilitated by mutations in genes repressing meristematic cell divisions. Genetics 149: 549-563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Nagata T, Nemoto Y, Hasezawa S (1992) Tobacco BY-2 cell line as the "Hela" cell in the cell biology of higher plants. Int Rev Cytol 132: 1-30[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Nagata T, Takebe I (1970) Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Planta 92: 301-308[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Negrutiu I, Shillito R, Potrykus I, Biasini G, Sala F (1987) Hybrid genes in the analysis of transformation conditions. Plant Mol Biol 8: 363-373
• Ni M, Dehesh K, Tepperman JM, Quail PH (1996) GT-2: in vivo transcriptional activation activity and definition of novel twin DNA binding domains with reciprocal target sequence selectivity. Plant Cell 8: 1041-1059[Abstract]
• Nimchuk Z, Marois E, Kjemtrup S, Leister RT, Katagiri F, Dangl JL (2000) Eukaryotic fatty acylation drives plasma membrane targeting and enhances function of several type III effector proteins from Pseudomonas syringae. Cell 101: 353-363[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Nishiguchi M, Langridge WHR, Szalay AA, Zaitlin M (1986) Electroporation-mediated infection of tobacco leaf protoplasts with tobacco mosaic virus RNA and cucumber mosaic virus RNA. Plant Cell Rep 5: 57-60
• Nurnberger T, Nennstiel D, Jabs T, Sacks WR, Hahlbrock K, Scheel D (1994) High affinity binding of a fungal oligopeptide elicitor to parsley plasma membranes triggers multiple defense responses. Cell 78: 449-460[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Ou-Lee T-M, Turgeon R, Wu R (1986) Expression of a foreign gene linked to either a plant-virus or a Drosophila promoter, after electroporation of protoplasts of rice, wheat, and sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6815-6819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Parinov S, Sundaresan V (2000) Functional genomics in Arabidopsis: Large-scale insertional mutagenesis complements the genome sequencing project. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11: 157-161[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Pauly N, Knight MR, Thuleau P, van der Luit AH, Moreau M, Trewavas AJ, Ranjeva R, Mazars C (2000) Control of free calcium in plant cell nuclei. Nature 405: 754-755[CrossRef][Medline]
• Podibelkowska M, Zarska-Maciejewska B, Kacperska-Palacz A (1975) Morphology of protoplast as affected by an inhibition of respiration. Protoplasma 83: 201-208[Medline]
• Potrykus I, Shillito RD, Saul M, Paszkowski J (1985) Direct gene transfer: state of the art and future perspectives. Plant Mol Biol Rep 3: 117-128
• Pouteau S, Huttner E, Grandbastien MA, Caboche M (1991) Specific expression of the tobacco Tnt1 retrotransposon in protoplasts. EMBO J 10: 1911-1918[Web of Science][Medline]
• Power JB, Chapman JV (1985) Isolation, culture and genetic manipulation of plant protoplasts. In RA Dixon, ed, Plant Cell Culture: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, UK, pp 37-66
• Richmond T, Somerville S (2000) Chasing the dream: plant EST microarrays. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 108-116[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Sadka A, DeWald DB, May GD, Park WD, Mullet JE (1994) Phosphate modulates transcription of soybean VspB and other sugar-inducible genes. Plant Cell 6: 737-749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Schaeffner AR, Sheen J (1991) Maize rbcS promoter activity depends on sequence elements not found in dicot rbcS promoters. Plant Cell 3: 997-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Schaeffner AR, Sheen J (1992) Maize C4 photosynthesis involves differential regulation of maize PEPC genes. Plant J 2: 221-232[Web of Science][Medline]
• Schroeder JI, Hedrich R, Fernandez JM (1984) Potassium-selective signle channels in guard cell protoplasts of Vicia faba. Nature 312: 361-362[CrossRef]
• Schroeder JI, Kwak JM, Allen GJ (2001) Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature 410: 327-330[CrossRef][Medline]
• Seed B, Sheen JY (1988) A simple phase-extraction assay for chloramphenicol acyltransferase activity. Gene 67: 271-277[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Sheen J (1990) Metabolic repression of transcription in higher plants. Plant Cell 2: 1027-1038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Sheen J (1991) Molecular mechanisms underlying the differential expression of maize pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase genes. Plant Cell 3: 225-245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Sheen J (1993) Protein phosphatase activity is required for light-inducible gene expression in maize. EMBO J 12: 3497-3505[Web of Science][Medline]
• Sheen J (1995) Methods for mesophyll and bundle sheath cell separation. Methods Cell Biol 49: 305-314[Web of Science][Medline]
• Sheen J (1996) Specific Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase in stress signal transduction. Science 274: 1900-1902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Sheen J (1998) Mutational analysis of protein phosphatase 2C involved in abscisic acid signal transduction in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 975-980
• Sheen J (1999) C4 gene expression. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50: 187-217[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Sheen J, Hwang S, Niwa Y, Kobayashi H, Galbraith DW (1995) Green-fluorescent protein as a new vital marker in plant cells. Plant J 8: 777-784[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang J-C (1999) Sugars as signaling molecules. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2: 410-418[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Subramaniam R, Desveaux D, Spickler C, Michnick SW, Brisson N (2001) Direct visualization of protein interactions in plant cells. Nature Biotechnol 19: 769-772[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Sussman MR, Amasino RM, Young JC, Krysan PJ, Austin-Phillips S (2000) The Arabidopsis knockout facility at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Plant Physiol 124: 1465-1467[Free Full Text]
• Takebe I (1971) Regeneration of whole plants from isolated mesophyll protoplasts of tobacco. Naturwissenschaft 58: 318-320[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Takeda S, Sugimoto K, Otsuki H, Hirochika H (1999) A 13-bp cis-regulatory element in the LTR promoter of the tobacco retrotransposon Tto1 is involved in responsiveness to tissue culture, wounding, methyl jasmonate and fungal elicitors. Plant J 18: 383-393[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Tena G, Asai T, Chiu W-L, Sheen J (2001) Plant MAP kinase signaling cascades. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4: 392-400[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Trewavas A (1999) Le calcium, C'est la vie: Calcium makes waves. Plant Physiol 120: 1-6[Free Full Text]
• Ueda T, Yamaguchi M, Uchimiya H, Nakano A (2001) Ara6, a plant-unique novel type Rab GTPase, functions in the endocytic pathway of Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J 20: 4730-4741[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Ulmasov T, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ (1997a) ARF1, a transcription factor that binds to auxin response elements. Science 276: 1865-1868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Ulmasov T, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ (1999) Activation and repression of transcription by auxin-response factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 5844-5849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Ulmasov T, Murfett J, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ (1997b) Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell 9: 1963-1971[Abstract]
• Uno Y, Furihata T, Abe H, Yoshida R, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2000) Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper transcription factors involved in an abscisic acid-dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high-salinity conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11632-11637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Urao T, Noji M-A, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1996) A transcriptional activation domain of ATMYB2, a drought-inducible Arabidopsis Myb-related protein. Plant Cell 10: 1145-1148
• Urao T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2000) Two-component systems in plant signal transduction. Trends Plant Sci 5: 67-74[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• van de Locht U, Meier I, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE (1990) A 125 bp promoter fragment is sufficient for strong elicitor-mediated gene activation in parsley. EMBO J 9: 2945-2950[Web of Science][Medline]
• Vasil IK, Vasil V (1972) Totipotency and embryogenesis in plant cell and tissue cultures. In Vitro 8: 117-127[Medline]
• Vasil V, Clancy M, Ferl RJ, Vasil IK, Hannah LC (1989) Increased gene expression by the intron of the maize sh1 locus in grass species. Plant Physiol 91: 1575-1579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Waibel F, Filipowicz W (1990) RNA-polymerase specificity of transcription of Arabidopsis U snRNA genes determined by promoter element spacing. Nature 346: 199-202[CrossRef][Medline]
• Walbot V (2000) Saturation mutagenesis using maize transposons. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 103-107[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Wenck AR, Marton L (1995) Large-scale protoplast isolation and regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biotechniques 18: 640-643[Medline]
• Worley CK, Zenser N, Ramos J, Rouse D, Leyser O, Theologis A, Callis J (2000) Degradation of Aux/IAA proteins is essential for normal auxin signalling. Plant J 21: 553-562[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Yanagisawa S, Sheen J (1998) Involvement of maize Dof zinc finger proteins in tissue-specific and light-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 10: 75-89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Zaitlin M, Beachy RN (1974) The use of protoplasts and separated cells in plant virus research. Adv Virus Res 19: 1-35[Medline]
• Zhu JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6: 66-71[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
• Zhu T, Wang X (2000) Large-scale profiling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome. Plant Physiol 124: 1472-1476[Free Full Text]