|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, December 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 1513-1523
UPDATE ON WOOD FORMATION IN TREES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
TREES ARE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE BIOSPHERE, AND THEIR WOOD HAS A MAJOR ROLE AS A SUSTAINABLE AND RENEWABLE ECOMATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wood is the most important natural and endlessly renewable source of energy and therefore has a major future role as an environmentally cost-effective alternative to burning fossils fuels. The major role of wood is not only the provision of energy but also the provision of energy-sufficient material for our buildings and many other products. In addition, developing wood cells represent one of the most important sinks for excess atmospheric CO2, thereby reducing one of the major contributors to global warming.
| |
WOOD IS ALSO A RAW MATERIAL FOR A MAJOR GLOBAL INDUSTRY, AND ITS DEMAND IS INCREASING |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wood is the fifth most important product of the world trade. Vast quantities of wood are logged by foresters to provide fuel, fibers (for pulp, paper products, and boards), and sawn timber (for house building and furniture) as commodities. The complex chemical makeup of wood (cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, and pectins) also makes it an ideal raw material for what could be a future "ligno-chemical" industry that could replace the petrochemical industry, in providing not only plastic and all kinds of chemical products, but also food and textile products.
| |
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF TREES CONFLICT INCREASINGLY WITH INDUSTRIAL FORESTRY PRACTICES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Resource analyses have led to the conclusion that wood and fiber needs over the next 40 years can only be met by logging 20% to 40% of the total present standing timber inventory in the natural forest (Food and Agriculture Organization). However, most agree that some of these forests should be either left completely alone or managed with only a minimum of wood extraction to preserve their environmental value.
| |
WHERE COULD THE WORLD FIND MORE WOOD IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The solution is to try to accomplish what agriculture has been doing for the last few centuries: grow wood as a crop in the same way that we grow wheat and maize. The future of the world's forests as well as the forest products industry will therefore depend to a huge extent on our ability to domesticate wild tree species and tailor them for maximum economic yield in the highly controlled environments typical of agriculture. The domestication of forest trees must be accomplished rationally, using the best available modern scientific methods, to develop high-yielding, intensively managed plantation forests, occupying a small percentage of existing forested land. In particular, the safe and careful application of biotechnology (marker-assisted breeding, genetic engineering, and in vitro propagation) to forestry practices, should help develop genetically superior trees in a time span of only a few decades.
| |
OUR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW WOOD DEVELOPS IS NOT COMPLETE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Considering the important role that wood is foreseen to play in
the near future, it is surprising to see that our understanding of how
wood develops is far from complete. With a few exceptions, very little
is known about the cellular, molecular, and developmental processes
that underlie wood formation. Xylogenesis represents an example of cell
differentiation in an exceptionally complex form. This process is
controlled by a wide variety of factors both exogenous (photoperiod and
temperature) and endogenous (phytohormones) and by interaction between
them. It is driven by the coordinated expression of numerous structural
genes (some of known function) involved in cell origination,
differentiation, programmed cell death, and heartwood (HW) formation
and by virtually unknown regulatory genes orchestrating this ordered
developmental sequence. The presence of gene families and the extreme
plasticity of the metabolism involved (as exemplified by the unusual
behavior of plants with transformed cell walls; for review, see Fagard
et al., 2000
) add a further complexity to our understanding of the
process of wood formation.
The making of wood spans a broad range of topics. Rather than to attempt a detailed review of all recent works in the different fields of wood formation, it is an objective of this contribution to give a brief overview and generalized concepts of this developmental process. We first open this Update by reviewing the well-known stages leading to the formation of wood, starting from the activities in a secondary meristem (the vascular cambium) to programmed cell death via the maturation of cambial derivatives. Emphasis is made on the biosynthesis and deposition of the main cell wall compounds, as well as the mediation of this ordered developmental process by phytohormones and transcription factors. The considerable plasticity in anatomical, chemical and physical wood properties is then described in view of providing a unique opportunity to dissect the molecular and biochemical mechanisms involved in such differences. Finally, the current progress in the molecular biology of wood development is presented.
| |
WOOD BIOSYNTHESIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wood (secondary xylem) is manufactured by a succession of five
major steps, including cell division, cell expansion (elongation and
radial enlargement), cell wall thickening (involving cellulose, hemicellulose, cell wall proteins, and lignin biosynthesis and deposition), programmed cell death, and HW formation. The developmental biology of wood has been recently extensively reviewed and the following reading will provide the reader with essential references in
research on vascular differentiation: Chaffey (1999)
, Lachaud et al.
(1999)
, Savidge et al. (2000)
, Chaffey (2001)
, and Mellerowicz et al.
(2001)
.
Wood Cells Originate from Vascular Cambium Activity
The vascular cambium is a secondary meristem derived from the
procambium, which in turn develops from the apical meristem (Larson,
1994
). The cambium plays a major role in the diametral growth of
gymnosperm and angiosperm shoots and roots and is of great
significance, particularly in respect to the wood that is produced.
Cambial activity ensures the perennial life of trees through the
regular renewing of functional xylem and phloem. The cambial zone
includes the cambium sensu stricto made up of only one layer of
juvenile cells, called initials, and the phloem and xylem mother cells,
which are both produced by the dividing cambial initials.
Xylem mother cells always divide more compared with phloem mother cells, which explains the considerable disproportion existing between phloem and xylem tissues (Fig. 1A). The cambial zone consists of a few layers of narrow, elongated, thin-walled cells and comprises two types of highly vacuolated cells (Fig. 1A). Short radial initials give rise to rays that are essential to the translocation of nutrients between phloem and xylem (Fig. 1B). Elongated fusiform initials divide length-wise and produce secondary vascular tissues through periclinal divisions (tangential plane) in a position-dependent manner: on the inner side, wood elements (mostly tracheids in gymnosperms, but also vessel elements, vessel-associated cells, axial parenchyma and fibers in dicotyledons) and, on the outer side, phloem cells (sieve tubes, and, in dicotyledons, companion cells, axial parenchyma, and fibers). Anticlinal (radial) divisions of the fusiform initials also produce daughter cells similar to mother cells and ensure the harmonious increase in circumference of the cambium (Fig. 1A). New ray initials are formed by subsequent anticlinal divisions of fusiform initials.
|
The Differentiation of Xylem Cells Involves Four Major Steps
The daughter cells, produced by the cambial initials, give rise to a wide variety of wood cells, whose unique characteristics and three-dimensional associations define the intrinsic structure of wood (Fig. 1B). In the following section we will focus on the maturation process engaged by the xylem cells: tracheids, vessels, and fibers involved in water transport and mechanical support of the entire tree. The differentiation of these cells involves four major steps: cell expansion, followed by the ordered deposition of a thick multilayered secondary cell wall, lignification, and cell death.
Derivative cells expand longitudinally and radially to reach their
final size during the formation of the primary wall. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylases, endoglucanases, expansins, pectin methyl esterases, and pectinases are among the primary determinants of this
process. Once expansion is completed, the formation of the secondary
cell wall begins, driven by the coordinated expression of numerous
genes specifically involved in the biosynthesis and assembly of four
major compounds: polysaccharides (cellulose, hemicelluloses), lignins,
cell wall proteins and other minor soluble (stilbenes, flavonoids,
tannins, and terpenoids), and insoluble (pectins and cell wall
proteins) compounds in a neutral solvent (Higuchi, 1997
).
Between 40% and 50% of wood consists of cellulose. The fundamental
structure units are the microfibrils (MFs), which are the result of a
strong association of inter- and intrachain hydrogen bonds between the
different chains of
-linked Glc residues in a manner so precise that
microfibrillar cellulose is largely crystalline. Until recently, not
even one single enzyme involved in cellulose biosynthesis and
deposition was purified or cloned (Arioli et al., 2000
). A first
breakthrough had been the identification of genes encoding the
catalytic subunit of the cellulose synthase (Ces) complex. In
Arabidopsis, at least six genes encode putative catalytic subunits of
Ces. In addition, a large gene family of over 20 more distantly related
genes, so-called Ces-like (Csl) genes, exists, whose gene products most
likely are involved in the synthesis of other polysaccharides. In
higher plants, the substrate for Ces (UDP-D-Glc) is
provided by Suc synthase. The complex Ces/Suc synthase is thought to
have a cytoplasmic localization and the growing cellulose chain may be
secreted through the membrane via a pore. Cortical microtubules (mainly
composed of
- and
-tubulin) may determine the wall pattern by
defining the position and orientation of cellulose MFs during the
differentiation of conducting elements (Chaffey, 2000
), probably by
guiding the movement of the cellulose-synthesizing complex in the
plasma membrane. However, although in many cases co-orientation of
microtubules and MFs were observed, mathematical models (that remain to
be tested in wood-forming tissue) relying on the geometry of the cell,
have been proposed to challenge this dogma (Mulder and Emons,
2001
).
The water-insoluble cellulose MFs are associated with mixtures of
soluble noncellulosic polysaccharides, the hemicelluloses, which
account for about 25% of the dry weight of wood. They generally occur
as heteropolymer such as glucomannan, galactoglucomannan, arabinogalactan, and glucuronoxylan, or as a homopolymer like galactan,
arabinan, and
-1,3-glucan. The biosynthesis of these polysaccharides
occurs in the Golgi apparatus by a process that can be divided into two
main steps: the synthesis of the backbone by polysaccharide synthases,
and the addition of side chain residues in reactions catalyzed by a
variety of glycosyltransferases (Keegstra and Raikhel, 2001
).
The third major component of wood (25%-35%) is lignin, a phenolic
polymer derived from three hydroxycinnamyl alcohols (monolignols): p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol,
giving rise to H, G, and S units, which differ from each other only by their degree of methoxylation. Lignin embeds the polysaccharide matrix
giving rigidity and cohesiveness to the wood tissue as a whole, and
providing the hydrophobic surface needed for the transport of water.
Lignin content and monomeric composition vary widely among different
taxa, individuals, tissues, cell types, and cell wall layers. As an
example, no S units are detected in gymnosperms compared with
angiosperms. Lignin biosynthesis has been the most studied pathway,
resulting in the cloning of several structural genes (Whetten et al.,
1998
; Christensen et al., 2000
). However, it is somewhat surprising
that recent attempts at engineering lignin biosynthesis have
demonstrated that our current models of the pathway are incomplete
(Grima-Pettenati and Goffner, 1999
).
Cell wall proteins and pectins are among the other minor compounds of
the cell wall. Although different proteins are present in the cell wall
at different times during development, the amount of protein remaining
in the wood is small. Nevertheless, such proteins could play important
roles determining the composition and morphology of xylem cell walls
(Cassab, 1998
). Abundant cell wall associated proteins have been found
in many plants and have traditionally been classified into four main
groups: Gly-rich proteins, Pro-rich proteins, arabinogalactan proteins,
and Hyp-rich glycoproteins (or extensins). These proteins are
cross-linked into the cell wall and probably have structural functions.
Pectins are thought to play a fundamental role in the regulation of
cell wall extensibility. They are also thought to be exported from the
Golgi apparatus as highly esterified galacturonan and then de-esterified in muro by cell wall-bound pectin methylesterases, thus
allowing the formation of intermolecular bonds through calcium ions
(Guglielmino et al., 1997
; Higuchi, 1997
).
When lignification is completed, conducting xylem elements undergo
programmed cell death, involving cell-autonomous, active, and ordered
suicide, in which specific hydrolases (Cys and Ser proteases,
nucleases, and RNase) are recruited (Roberts and McCann, 2000
). Several
factors (auxins, cytokinins, and Suc) prepare the cell to die by
determining the profile of hydrolases synthesized by the cell. These
hydrolases are inactive in the vacuole. By a signal that remains
unknown, a calcium flux provokes the vacuoles to collapse with the
release of hydrolases (Jones, 2001
) that degrade all of the cellular
content but not the secondary cell wall.
Regulation of Wood Biosynthesis
The role of phytohormones in procambium initiation, cambial cell
division, primary cell wall expansion, and secondary wall formation has
been reviewed by Sundberg et al. (2000)
and Mellerowicz et al. (2001)
.
Recent findings have demonstrated the existence of an auxin
(indole-3-acetic acid [IAA]) gradient across the developing vascular
tissues of pine and poplar. This IAA concentration gradient seems to
have a function in positional signaling, i.e. cambial derivatives
develop according to their position along the gradient, and neighboring
cell files receive the same dose to develop in a synchronized manner. A
Suc gradient has been observed as well and may provide additional
positional information for xylem and phloem differentiation. Other
hormones than auxins have been shown to be involved in xylogenesis by
interacting with IAA in a synergetic (gibberellins, cytokinins, and
ethylene) or inhibitory (abscisic acid) manner.
Knowledge of the molecular events that determine the differentiation
pathway of a cambial derivative is embryonic. Even if the intervening
signal transduction steps remain mysterious, we can assume that these
signaling inputs result in altered patterns of gene transcription,
which in turn requires the activity of specific transcription factors.
In particular, considerable progress has been made in understanding the
roles of transcription factors in controlling lignification. The
analysis of lignification genes have also shown the presence in the
promoter of conserved motifs that have been demonstrated to be
important in xylem localized gene expression (Lacombe et al., 2000
).
Proteins that can bind this motif and activate the transcription,
belong to the MYB family. Two MYB genes preferentially expressed in
Pinus taeda xylem were proposed to be involved in regulating
transcription during xylogenesis (Newman and Campbell, 2000
).
Wood Cell Walls Are Highly Structured
The cell wall is composed of several layers that are fabricated at
different periods during cell differentiation (Fig.
2). The first layer to be developed after
cell division is called the middle lamella, which is found between the
wood cells, and ensures the adhesion of a cell with its neighbors. The
middle lamella is only 0.5 to 1.5 µm thick and is made up of pectic
substances to which lignin may be added during the differentiation
period. At the beginning of cell differentiation, the primary cell wall forms. This new, highly elastic layer is attached to the middle lamella
and is approximately 0.1 µm thick. The primary cell wall is made up
of several layers of MFs, which are arranged randomly within this wall.
Pectic substances, lignin, and hemicelluloses can be found between
these MFs. As the developing cell reaches its definitive size, a new
layer is formed inside the primary cell wall, which is the most
important layer for the cell, in terms of mechanical strength. This new
secondary cell wall is divided into three different layers,
S1, S2, and
S3 (Timell, 1986
). Each of these layers is
composed of cellulose MFs, aligned in an ordered, parallel arrangement,
which differs from S layer to S layer. Hemicelluloses and lignin are
also present in each of these layers. These three S layers can be
modified during cell maturation, which lasts for several days after the
birth of the wood cell, e.g. the amount of lignin and cellulose laid
down in the secondary cell wall may be influenced by abiotic factors
such as mechanical stress, i.e. wind and stem lean.
|
The S1 layer is the thinnest of the S layers, being only 0.1 to 0.35 µm thick, and representing just 5% to 10% of the total thickness of the cell wall. This layer is considered as an intermediate between the primary cell wall and the S2 and S3 layers. The MF angle with regard to the cell axis is 60° to 80°. The S2 layer is the thickest layer in the secondary cell wall, and is the most important, with regard to mechanical support. The thickness of the S2 layer varies between 1 and 10 µm, and accounts for 75% to 85% of the total thickness of the cell wall. The MF angle in this layer is 5° to 30° to the cell axis, and can be even higher, depending on external mechanical stress (see later section on reaction wood). The angle of the cellulose MFs in the S2 layer can influence greatly the physical and mechanical properties of the cell and even stem wood as a whole. As the MF angle increases, with regard to the cell axis, wood becomes less rigid, and the longitudinal modulus of elasticity decreases, as in the case of juvenile and compression wood (CW). The innermost layer of the secondary cell wall, the S3 layer, is relatively thin, being only 0.5 to 1.10 µm thick. The MFs are ordered in a parallel arrangement, but less strictly than in the S2 layer, and the MF angle is 60° to 90° with regard to the cell axis.
Newly Developed Wood Is Stretched Longitudinally and Compressed Tangentially
Immediately after cell birth, the newly developed cells undergo a
several day long "maturation" period, in which two mechanisms take
place in the cell wall: (a) as lignin is deposited, the amorphic cellulose matrix swells transversely, and (b) when cellulose
crystallization occurs, MFs shrink longitudinally. The combined effect
of these two mechanisms results in a longitudinal shrinking of the cell (Fig. 3). However, as the maturing wood
cells are attached to older, already lignified cells, they cannot
shrink completely. Hence, these maturing cells are held in a state of
tensile stress, and it is only on cutting the wood, that these
"maturation stresses" can be released in the form of residual
strains along the longitudinal axis (Archer, 1986
). The wood cells at
the surface of a tree are therefore stretched longitudinally and
compressed tangentially and can be said to be held in tension. However,
as more and more wood is added to the tree surface, the wood cells
inside the trunk are slowly compressed, until they are completely held
in compression, toward the center of the trunk. This gradient of
mechanical stress in a trunk, whereby the outside is held in tension,
and the center in compression, is called growth stress, and can be
highly detrimental to wood quality, resulting in warping and twisting
of boards and planks.
|
HW: The Final Transformation of Xylem Cells
On cutting a mature tree, several different colored zones may be
observed, a lighter colored external zone: the sapwood (SW), and often
a darker colored wood: the HW situated at the center of the tree (Fig.
4). A third zone, often intermediate in
color
the transition zone, TZ
may exist between the two. SW is known
as the functional part of the tree and is sometimes termed the
"living" part of the tree. Although SW contains living cells, most
of its mass is comprised of terminally differentiated non-living
tracheids or libriform fibers. Soon after their birth in the cambium,
wood cells die, except for the longitudinal and radial parenchyma
cells, which remain alive and functional until several years later,
when they too die. It is when these parenchyma cells become
dysfunctional, that HW forms. A specific role for HW has not yet been
determined, although it has been suggested that it forms to provide
long-term resistance to pathogens or even provides a mechanical role in tree support. Recent research suggests that HW forms as a response to a
hydraulic stimulus and that HW may even develop irregularly, both
radially and longitudinally in the trunk, to maintain a constant and
optimal proportion of SW in the tree stem (Berthier et al., 2001
). As
yet, there is no clear explanation as to why or how HW forms, although
a theory has been put forward by Higuchi (1997)
, which is supported by
recent research. Higuchi (1997)
proposed that endogenous factors
trigger expression of genes involved in phenolics biosynthesis in
parenchyma cells bordering the TZ. As the parenchyma cells die, these
phenolics are released and diffused into the neighboring cell walls and
lumens.
|
Possible candidates that may trigger the molecular signal include an
increase in ethylene, which is needed for polyphenol production, or a
rapid change in water content near the TZ resulting in bordered pit
aspiration, and even external mechanical stress, i.e. wind loading or
stem lean, as trees which have been subjected to such a stress, show
greater HW formation near the zone of mechanical loading (Berthier et
al., 2001
). However, HW formation is also under species-specific
genetic control as some species exist which do not even produce HW,
even at a very advanced age (Hillis, 1987
). Once genes in the TZ have
been activated by a molecular signal, a cascade of events occurs
resulting in eventual cell death. Very little work has been carried out
on the identification of the genes involved in this process. However,
recent research has shown that in black walnut (Juglans
nigra), flavanol biosynthesis was up-regulated in the TZ.
Flavonoids are highly soluble polyphenols and in black walnut, the
flavanol production was found to be highly correlated with the
transcript levels of genes encoding the enzymes chalcone synthase
(CHS), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), and
dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), all of which are
implicated in the flavonoid pathway (Beritognolo et al., 2001
). At the
same time that these genes are being expressed in the TZ, carbohydrate
content decreases drastically in this zone. Magel et al. (1994)
found
that in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) non-structural
storage carbohydrates (Glc, Fru, Suc, and starch) decrease from the
outer to the inner SW, with only trace amounts present in the TZ,
thereby suggesting that these sugars and starch are necessary for
polyphenol synthesis.
To elucidate the mechanism by which HW forms, future research should concentrate on the genes expressed in the TZ of different species, as well as the factors, endogenous or exogenous, inducing molecular activity in this zone.
Wood Is a Highly Variable Raw Material
Wood differs among trees. Use of the terms "softwood" for gymnosperms and "hardwood" for dicotyledon angiosperms is a crude acknowledgment of this difference. This variability is due to the heterogeneity of the cell types that make up the different woods and the structure of the individual cells. Anatomical, chemical, and physical differences in wood characteristics within a single tree are also a common feature. These include: (a) variation within the annual ring in temperate zones, i.e. early versus late wood, (b) variation due to juvenile wood (JW) with extremely variable properties, ranging from the pith to the bark, particularly in the early years of cambium activity, and (c) variation between normal and reaction wood. Wood can also be modified by damage from pathogens and by wounding.
Wood Formation Varies during the Growing Season
In temperate regions, the annual course of cambial activity
(dormancy and activation) is induced by temperature and/or photoperiod (Uggla et al., 2001
and refs. therein). In temperate zones, EW is
formed early in the growing season when temperature and photoperiod are
favorable for active growth. EW has shorter cells and a lower density
resulting from thin-walled tracheids or fibers of large radial diameter
(Fig. 4B). LW is formed in the late summer or autumn when cambial cell
division and expansion declines. LW has high density resulting from the
small tracheid/fiber radial diameter and large tangential wall
thickness. Having narrower lumens in the wood cells, the LW is much
less vulnerable to water-stress-induced xylem embolism, and so
increases the safety of water conductance. The passage of one type of
wood cell to another is always abrupt between two growing seasons, i.e.
between autumn and the following spring. However, within one growing
season, this passage may be relatively progressive or abrupt depending
on the species.
Wood Formation Varies during the Aging Process
The transition from juvenile wood (formed during the first 10-20
years of a tree's life, i.e. in young trees and in the crown of older
trees; Zobel and Sprague, 1998
) to mature wood (MW) is another major
transition typically found in wood during a tree's life (Fig. 4A). As
demand for wood continues to increase and as new trees are developed
that grow faster than their predecessors and are often logged at an
early stage, the proportion of JW in the harvested timber increases.
One of the characteristics of JW compared with MW is a lower density
and a higher MF angle, which generally leads to such wood being
considered "inferior" (lower tensile and tear strength) to MW.
Reaction Wood: A Mechanism by Which Trees Respond to Stem Displacement
Reaction wood is generally formed in response to a non-vertical
orientation of the stem caused by prevailing winds, snow, slope, or
asymmetric crown shape. This abnormal type of wood forms as part of a
developmental process, which aims to re-orient a leaning stem or
branch, so as to enable the tree find a more favorable position (for
review, see Timell, 1986
; Zobel and van Buijtenen, 1989
). In both
softwood and hardwood species, such tissue is often associated with
eccentric radial growth of the leaning stem and in conifers is called
CW as it often appears in localized zones of the tree held in
compression, e.g. on the underside of a leaning stem. CW is highly
lignified with more p-hydroxyphenyl subunits, and contains
less cellulose than NW. The density of CW is up to 50% higher than
that of NW. In CW, the MFangle of the cellulose fibers in the
S2 layer of the cell wall is high (<45°), tracheid length is reduced, cell cross-sectional profile is rounder, and the
intercellular spaces larger.
In hardwood species, reaction wood is called tension wood (TW) as it
tends to form in zones of the tree held in tension e.g. the upper side
of a leaning stem. The overall lignin content of TW is lower, the
cellulose content is higher and MFangle is lower than that of
corresponding NW. The wood produced on the side of a stem or branch
opposite to the reaction wood (opposite wood) may also be of a special
nature and can be viewed as having many properties intermediate between
NW and reaction wood (Timell, 1986
). The signaling pathway which
controls reaction wood formation is still poorly understood but may be
a gravitropic response of the tree, related to intrinsic growth
direction and phytohormone distribution and interaction, particularly
that of ethylene and auxin (Timell, 1986
; Sundberg et al., 1994
; Little
and Eklund, 1999
).
A high proportion of reaction wood in a trunk is considered to be a major problem for several industrial applications. CW constitutes major defects in wood quality (the increase in S2 MF angle in CW, causes an increase in longitudinal shrinkage, and consequently, lumber with CW is more likely to warp during drying) and fiber products (decrease of pulp yield). TW is also a problem for the solid wood industry as it increases longitudinal, radial, and tangential shrinkage during the drying process.
The most important mechanism by which reaction wood allows a tree to
return to the vertical, occurs during the cell maturation process. In
CW (gymnosperms), the MF angle in the S2 layer is much higher (30°-45° to the cell axis) than in NW (5°-30°),
due to a greater deposit of lignin laid down between the MF chains. As
a result of this change in cell wall chemical composition, the newly
developed wood cells tend to expand longitudinally. However, as
explained in a previous section for NW, the new cells are attached to
older cells, and cannot deform fully, therefore, they too exist in a
state of mechanical stress. On cutting CW in a tree trunk, the wood
therefore expands longitudinally, as these stresses are released. In TW
(angiosperms), an extra layer exists between the lumen and the
S3 layer, called the gelatinous, or G layer. The
G layer is almost entirely made up of cellulose, with an almost
vertical MF angle. During maturation, this layer shrinks strongly in
the longitudinal direction, thereby creating a very strong state of
tensile stress in the cell. The combined result of reaction wood cells
is to "push" the tree upright in the case of conifers, and to
"pull" the tree to a vertical position in hardwoods (Archer, 1986
;
Timell, 1986
).
This considerable plasticity in wood properties, as reflected by the coexistence of these several different types of wood within a single tree, is certainly due to natural variations in the expression patterns of genes/proteins. This variation provides a unique opportunity to dissect the molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying such differences.
| |
MOLECULAR STUDIES OF SECONDARY CELL WALL FORMATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wood properties are known to vary among species and among
genotypes within species. This variability is heritable and thus presents an opportunity to select for improved wood properties, i.e.
superior product quality (Zobel and Jett, 1995
). Such selection is
currently hampered by costly traditional chemical and technological assays and the necessity to wait until the trees are nearly mature to
evaluate wood properties. Application of modern genomic sciences to
identify the genes controlling these properties, should increase selection efficiency and/or reduce the time and costs associated with
measuring such properties, by providing early selection criteria and
tools to alter cell wall properties in transgenic trees. As a highly
specialized developmental process that is likely to involve a unique
set of genes, it is obvious that the first place to study the molecular
mechanisms of wood formation in woody perennials is trees.
As the secondary xylem of softwoods and hardwoods is different in many aspects, both gymnosperm and angiosperm species should be studied to fully understand the process of wood formation. Populus spp. and Eucalyptus spp. are evident candidates among the hardwood species, because of their ease of vegetative propagation, their suitability for genetic transformation, their small genome size (5 × 108 and 6 × 108 bp respectively, i.e. only a little larger than that of Arabidopsis) and the availability of genetic maps. With regard to the conifer model, and considering the high conservation of chromosome number and gene sequences in conifer species as well as the homogeneous cellular components of the wood, it is likely that the results gathered in the few studied species will be of benefit to research on other conifers.
The formation of the secondary cell wall is driven by the coordinated
expression of numerous genes specifically involved in the biosynthesis,
assembly, and deposition of polysaccharides, lignins, pectins, and cell
wall protein. The use of molecular techniques in wood research has
allowed the identification and characterization of a rather small
proportion of the key molecular players involved in this process
(Higuchi, 1997
; Savidge et al., 2000
), such as those involved in
lignification (Whetten et al., 1998
) and cellulose synthesis (Arioli et
al., 2000
), but also hemicelluloses (Reid, 2000
), cell wall-associated
proteins (Zhang et al., 2000
), and pectins (Reid, 2000
). This lack of
information is illustrated by the fact that from the several hundred
genes presumably required for polysaccharide biosynthesis and
deposition, only a handful have been characterized. Even if the main
structural pathways are known to a certain extent, virtually nothing is
known about their specific regulation.
It is likely that some unknown fraction of wood quality variability
will derive from structural or regulatory genes that have not yet been
identified and sequenced. Therefore, much more information at the gene
and protein expression level is needed in order to understand the
profound basic pathways characteristic for wood physiology
and to create tools which could be targets for biotechnological approaches leading to the introduction of desired wood properties. Large scale cDNA sequencing efforts to identify genes that are related
to wood formation are being developed for tree species (see the list of
public-domain projects at
http://www.pierroton.inra.fr/Lignome/links.html). Based on the
determination of putative gene function by sequence homology, a wealth
of genes of known function and that are active during the
formation of woody tissues were isolated, providing a pool of candidate
genes (CGs) for genetic manipulation of the wood forming processes. A
significant proportion of the genes were also classified as orphan
(Allona et al., 1998
; Sterky et al., 1998
). We can speculate that some
of these unknown genes could be specific regulators involved in wood
formation. Transcript profiling using cDNA microarrays is being used in
concert with proteomics for tracking the genes/proteins of interest and
to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the molecular process of
wood formation. In poplar, the expression patterns of 2,995 genes were
analyzed during the successive stages in the differentiation process
leading to mature xylem cells (Hertzberg, 2001
). This author also
showed that many structural and potential regulatory genes of
xylogenesis were under a strict developmental stage-specific regulation.
Of particular interest are those genes/proteins that underlie the
anatomical, structural, and chemical differences observed between TW or
CW versus NW (Zhang and Chiang, 1997
; McDougall, 2000
; Plomion et al.,
2000
; Wu et al., 2000
; Zhang et al., 2000
), EW versus LW, and JW versus
MW. The identification and characterization of gene products
differentially expressed in developing xylem, associated with a range
of wood characteristics, pinpoint important genes controlling chemical
composition and architecture of cell walls and cell shape, therefore
determining wood and end-use properties.
Proteins accumulating abundantly in young differentiating xylem of pine
and poplar (Costa et al., 1999
; Mijnsbrugge et al., 2000
) also provide
us with essential knowledge of secondary cell wall formation. It is
remarkable that S-adenosyl-l-Met synthases, one of the most
highly expressed genes in poplar (Sterky et al., 1998
) and pine (Allona
et al., 1998
) developing-xylem expressed sequence tag libraries, were
also strongly expressed at the proteome level in both species (Costa et
al., 1999
; Mijnsbrugge et al., 2000
). The presence of several
S-adenosyl-l-Met synthases points out the importance of
methyl transfer reactions and the complexity of gene regulation for
methyl-group donation during xylogenesis.
The identification of genes specifically expressed in the highly specialized vascular cambium or differentiating xylem tissues may also give us substantial information with respect to the molecular processes involved in xylogenesis. Such genes are thought to play critical roles in the genetic engineering of wood properties, because genetic manipulation will require precise spatial regulation of introduced sequences.
All of these studies are powerful strategies to the identification of CGs potentially involved in wood formation and in controlling the chemical and mechanical properties of wood. Whether these CGs are involved in the genetic control of wood quality traits still needs to be tested by using (a) reverse genetics experiments in trees or model organisms or (b) forward genetics experiments: colocation study between CGs and wood quality quantitative trait loci or linkage disequilibrium mapping in natural populations. Mapping such CG is already under way in eucalyptus, pine and poplar, for which quantitative trait loci for wood and end-uses properties have been localized on genetic linkage maps.
| |
PROSPECTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Non-Woody Systems Shed New Light on the Cell Biology of Xylogenesis... .
It is obvious that for the study of wood formation, woody models are desirable. However, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in cell wall biosynthesis and assembly can also arise from model plant systems such as Arabidopsis and zinnia (Zinnia elegans). Crucial to the use of such wood-forming models is the degree of similarity of xylem formation in these plants to that in the tree. More and more evidence supports the view that the vast majority of the biochemical, metabolic, cellular, and developmental processes is conserved throughout the plant kingdom. This theory also applies to secondary xylem formation. Indeed, even if wood properties can be highly specific for a given species, it is reasonable to assume that the differences in wood properties are the result of natural variation in expression patterns or biochemical properties of proteins, and are also part of the biochemical, metabolic, cellular, and developmental pathways conserved by the evolution processes. Some of these conserved pathways have already been identified. They include for example, the synthesis, deposition, and orientation of cellulose MFs. The formation of reaction wood, although highly specific to trees, also involves conserved signaling pathways including thigmomorphogenesis, ethylene, and auxin signaling pathways.
Arabidopsis undergoes secondary substantial thickening in the hypocotyl
under appropriate growth conditions, and can therefore be viewed as a
miniature tree (Chaffey et al., 2001
). This species is the most
advanced model system used in plant biology, with the complete genome
sequence already available. With respect to wood formation, screening
for Arabidopsis mutants (for review, see Fagard et al., 2000
; Roberts
and McCann, 2000
) has already yielded interesting results concerning
structural and regulatory genes (e.g. homeobox genes). A gene playing a
crucial role in the control of the orientation of microtubules in
Arabidopsis has been identified (Bichet et al., 2001
; Burk et al.,
2001
) and is very likely to play a similar role in other plant species
including tree species. An alternative use of Arabidopsis in research
in xylogenesis would be to reveal the function of CGs identified in
tree genomics projects by reverse genetics or identification of
knock-out mutants.
Certain aspects of wood development are also being studied in the
ornamental garden plant, zinnia. In zinnia, mesophyll cells can be
induced to redifferentiate synchronously, into tracheary elements,
hence, proteins and genes can be identified at different stages of
xylem formation (Roberts and McCann, 2000
; Milioni et al.,
2001
).
... But Trees Will Remain the Main Model for Field Testing
The limited amount of cambium and secondary xylem and the small size of these non-woody models make it difficult to isolate large amounts of tissue for investigations into the molecular biology and biochemistry of wood formation. In contrast, during the active growth of trees, kilograms of maturing xylem may be readily collected by simply peeling away the bark, thus providing highly enriched material for molecular studies. Given also the heterogeneous structure and complex functioning (i.e. seasonal cycle of cambial dormancy-activity, wood maturation, and production of HW) of wood, trees will remain the main model to investigate the whole dimension of the "making" of wood.
For a long time, the understanding of the process by which the vascular cambium produces wood has progressed very slowly. There has been an extensive descriptive literature addressing wood anatomy, chemistry and physical properties. The understanding of the molecular and physiological mechanisms of cambial activity and wood formation is now considered as the main research area which must draw upon diverse disciplines, including genomics as well as the more traditional biochemical and wood sciences.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Björn Sundberg, Jacqueline Grima-Pettenati, Herman Höfte, and Nigel Chaffey for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received September 6, 2001; returned for revision October 2, 2001; accepted October 4, 2001.
1 This work was supported by the European Union (grant nos. GENIALITY FAIR-CT98-3953 and GEMINI QLRT-1999-00942), the Ministère de la Recherche (grant no. 98C0204), the Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche (grant no. DERF 01.40.40/99), and the Région Aquitaine (grant no. CCRRDT 20000307007). G.L. is supported by a joint PhD fellowship from Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique and Région Aquitaine.
* Corresponding author; e-mail plomion{at}pierroton.inra.fr; fax 33-55-79-79-088.
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010816.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Structure and Function
13: 138-151This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. J. Mellerowicz, P. Immerzeel, and T. Hayashi Xyloglucan: The Molecular Muscle of Trees Ann. Bot., November 1, 2008; 102(5): 659 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nishikubo, T. Awano, A. Banasiak, V. Bourquin, F. Ibatullin, R. Funada, H. Brumer, T. T. Teeri, T. Hayashi, B. Sundberg, et al. Xyloglucan Endo-transglycosylase (XET) Functions in Gelatinous Layers of Tension Wood Fibers in Poplar--A Glimpse into the Mechanism of the Balancing Act of Trees Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 843 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q.-H. Zhu, A.-Y. Guo, G. Gao, Y.-F. Zhong, M. Xu, M. Huang, and J. Luo DPTF: a database of poplar transcription factors Bioinformatics, May 15, 2007; 23(10): 1307 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Friedmann, S. G. Ralph, D. Aeschliman, J. Zhuang, K. Ritland, B. E. Ellis, J. Bohlmann, and C. J. Douglas Microarray gene expression profiling of developmental transitions in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) apical shoots J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2007; 58(3): 593 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Gonzalez-Martinez, N. C. Wheeler, E. Ersoz, C. D. Nelson, and D. B. Neale Association Genetics in Pinus taeda L. I. Wood Property Traits Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 399 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mitsuda, A. Iwase, H. Yamamoto, M. Yoshida, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki, and M. Ohme-Takagi NAC Transcription Factors, NST1 and NST3, Are Key Regulators of the Formation of Secondary Walls in Woody Tissues of Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, January 1, 2007; 19(1): 270 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Read and A. Stokes Plant biomechanics in an ecological context Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1546 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gierlinger and M. Schwanninger Chemical Imaging of Poplar Wood Cell Walls by Confocal Raman Microscopy Plant Physiology, April 1, 2006; 140(4): 1246 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Thumma, M. F. Nolan, R. Evans, and G. F. Moran Polymorphisms in Cinnamoyl CoA Reductase (CCR) Are Associated With Variation in Microfibril Angle in Eucalyptus spp. Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1257 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. GRICAR, K. CUFAR, P. OVEN, and U. SCHMITT Differentiation of Terminal Latewood Tracheids in Silver Fir Trees During Autumn Ann. Bot., May 1, 2005; 95(6): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Ko, K.-H. Han, S. Park, and J. Yang Plant Body Weight-Induced Secondary Growth in Arabidopsis and Its Transcription Phenotype Revealed by Whole-Transcriptome Profiling Plant Physiology, June 1, 2004; 135(2): 1069 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|