|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, December 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 1524-1532
UPDATE ON C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The biochemical and
physiological characteristics of C4
photosynthesis have been researched and clarified in detail. We now know that the differentiation of two cell types, mesophyll cells (MC)
and bundle sheath cells (BSC), is required for efficient C4 photosynthesis. Thus, the leaves of
C4 plants have more complicated structural and
functional features than those of C3 plants
(Hatch, 1999
; Kanai and Edwards, 1999
). Current studies are focused on elucidating the regulatory mechanisms of genetic and developmental events in C4 photosynthesis, but most of them are
as yet poorly understood (Dengler and Nelson, 1999
; Sheen, 1999
). There
is much indirect evidence that C4 plants have
evolved in parallel from C3 plants among diverse
taxonomic groups (Kellogg, 1999
). Some C3-C4 intermediate plants,
such as Flaveria spp., provide a suitable system for
studying the possible process of evolution of C4
plants (Ku et al., 1991
; Westhoff et al., 1997
). It is becoming clear that there is diversity not only in the structural and biochemical features, but also in the genetic and developmental aspects of C4 photosynthesis (Dengler and Nelson, 1999
;
Sheen, 1999
; Edwards et al., 2001
).
This article reviews the available data on the
differentiation of photosynthetic characteristics in some amphibious
species of Eleocharis in the Cyperaceae, with particular
reference to the sedge Eleocharis vivipara. E. vivipara has
a unique nature that expresses C4 characteristics
under terrestrial conditions and C3
characteristics under submerged aquatic conditions (Ueno et al., 1988
).
This characteristic is unknown in other C4
plants, and this plant provides an excellent opportunity to investigate the development of C4 photosynthesis in response
to environmental factors. The amphibious species of
Eleocharis are also useful for increasing our understanding
of the ecological and adaptive aspects of C4 plants.
| |
C3 AND C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the C3 pathway,
CO2 is fixed by Rubisco and is synthesized into
carbohydrate. This metabolic pathway operates only in the MC. Leaves of
C4 plants display Kranz anatomy, in which
vascular bundles are surrounded by an outer layer of MC and an inner
layer of BSC (Dengler and Nelson, 1999
). In the
C4 pathway, CO2 is fixed initially by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), which
is localized in the MC, forming C4 acids (malate
and Asp). The C4 acids are transported to the
BSC, where they are decarboxylated by
C4-acid-decarboxylating enzymes. The released
CO2 is incorporated in the
C3 cycle by the operation of Rubisco. In the
process of decarboxylation of the C4 acids,
pyruvate is also formed. This C3 compound is
returned to the MC and used for regeneration of phosphoenolpyruvate by pyruvate, Pi dikinase (PPDK). The
operation of the C4 cycle results in the
increased concentration of CO2 at the active site
of Rubisco in the BSC and suppression of the oxygenase reaction of
Rubisco. As a consequence, C4 photosynthesis is
more efficient than C3 photosynthesis under some
environmental conditions (Hatch, 1999
; Kanai and Edwards,
1999
).
In general, most plants use one of these photosynthetic modes: Leaves
of rice and maize fix carbon through the C3
pathway and the C4 pathway, respectively,
although the reproductive organs may use different photosynthetic
pathways (Imaizumi et al., 1990
; Langdale and Nelson, 1991
).
Environmental factors influence the expression of photosynthetic
machinery in some plants. Well-known examples occur in plants with
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), such as common ice plant
(Mesembryanthemum crystallinum), and in some submerged
aquatic plants, such as Hydrilla verticillata. In the
former, a switch from C3 to CAM mode is induced
by NaCl stress (Winter and Smith, 1996
), whereas in the latter a change from C3 to C4 metabolism
occurs if CO2 is limited in the water (Bowes and
Salvucci, 1989
; Reiskind et al., 1997
). In these facultative CAM plants
and aquatic plants, the photosynthetic carbon metabolism operates in a
single cell, and no differentiation of two cell types is required. In
contrast, C4 photosynthesis requires structural differentiation and biochemical specialization of photosynthetic cells.
Therefore, conversion between C3 and
C4 modes may not be as easy for plants as those
between other modes.
| |
DISCOVERY OF C3 AND C4 DIFFERENTIATION IN E. VIVIPARA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many C4 species occur in the
monocotyledonous family Cyperaceae, and most of them thrive in
relatively wet habitats. Thus, the C4 group of
the Cyperaceae represents ecologically unusual C4
plants (Ueno and Takeda, 1992
). Several genera that include both
C3 and C4 species, such as
Cyperus, Rhynchospora, and Eleocharis, are found in this family (Takeda et al., 1980
; Bruhl et al., 1987
). At
the New York Botanical Garden, I extensively screened the
photosynthetic modes of Eleocharis spp. by examining
herbarium specimens. This study revealed that most species in the genus
are C3 plants, but some species possess
characteristics of C4 and
C3-C4 intermediate plants
(Ueno et al., 1989
). Furthermore, this study led to a more important
discovery that the amphibious species E. vivipara exhibits Kranz anatomy in the photosynthetic tissues of the terrestrial form,
but exhibits non-Kranz anatomy in those of the submerged form.
Subsequent biochemical studies with fresh plants in Dr. Miyachi's
laboratory demonstrated that E. vivipara can display C3 or C4 characteristics,
depending on the environmental conditions (Ueno et al., 1988
).
E. vivipara occurs in the margins of ponds, marshes, swamps,
and wet ditches in Florida (Wunderlin, 1998
). The plants grow continuously in conditions ranging from completely aerial to
semi-aerial and semi-submerged, to completely submerged aquatic (Fig.
1A).
|
| |
STRUCTURAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN E. VIVIPARA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In E. vivipara, the leaf blades are reduced, and the
culms function as photosynthetic tissues, as seen in all other members of Eleocharis spp. Some amphibious plants exhibit
heterophylly between aerial and aquatic leaves (Sculthorpe, 1967
; Smith
and Hake, 1992
). This is the case in culms of E. vivipara
(Fig. 1B). The terrestrial form has erect, hard culms. In contrast, the
submerged form shows a hair-like morphology consisting of slender, soft culms, and reproduces new culms by proliferation from sterile spikelets
at the apex of the culms.
The dimorphism is clearer in the anatomical features of the culms (Ueno
et al., 1988
; Ueno, 1996a
). The culms of the terrestrial form show
Kranz anatomy, but the structure is complex: There are three bundle
sheaths
the outermost parenchymatous sheath, the middle mestome
sheath, and the innermost organelle-rich sheath
together with the
MC (Fig. 2A). The innermost BSC
(Kranz cells) include many granal chloroplasts and large
mitochondria. In contrast, the culms of the submerged form lack Kranz
anatomy (Fig. 2B). The MC have a spherical shape, forming one or two
layers inside the epidermis. The innermost BSC are small and include
only a few small chloroplasts and mitochondria. As a result, the MC to BSC volume ratio is much higher in the submerged form than in the
terrestrial form. The culms of the submerged form lack stomata, and the
vascular bundles are reduced both in size and number compared with
those in the terrestrial form.
|
The 14C pulse-12C chase
experiment indicates that the terrestrial form shows a pattern of
14C labeling characteristic of
C4 plants, forming Asp and malate as initial
photosynthetic products. However, the submerged form shows a
C3 pattern of labeling, forming
C3 compounds as initial products (Ueno et al.,
1988
). The terrestrial form has high activities of
C4 enzymes, such as PEPC, PPDK, and NAD-malic
enzyme (ME), whereas in the submerged form these activities are low.
Rubisco activity in the submerged form is almost the same as, or higher than, that in the terrestrial form (Ueno et al., 1988
; Ueno, 1998a
). These trends in enzymatic activity have also been confirmed by the
amounts of these enzyme proteins present after immunoblotting (Ueno,
1996b
).
To understand the photosynthetic pathways operating in the two growth
forms, it is important to determine in which cells and compartments the
photosynthetic enzymes are localized (Fig. 2C). Immunogold localization
studies reveal that in the terrestrial form PEPC is localized in the
cytosol of both the MC and the outermost BSC (Fig.
3A), and NAD-ME is found in the
mitochondria of the innermost BSC. In the submerged form, these enzymes
occur in the same sites as in the terrestrial form, but at low levels
(Fig. 3B; Ueno, 1996b
, 1998a
). PPDK is also distributed in the
chloroplasts of the MC and the outermost BSC, and at higher levels in
the terrestrial form than in the submerged form. In addition, cytosolic
PPDK is found in the photosynthetic cells of both growth forms, which is unusual in C4 leaves (Ueno, 1996b
). In both
the terrestrial and submerged forms, Rubisco is distributed in the
chloroplasts of the MC, the outermost BSC, and the innermost BSC (Ueno,
1996b
). This cellular distribution of Rubisco is unknown in typical
C4 plants. In C4 species of
the Cyperaceae, such as Fimbristylis and Cyperus,
which also show unusual Kranz anatomy, Rubisco is restricted to only
the innermost BSC (Ueno, 1998b
).
|
From these studies, it is evident that the NAD-ME-dependent
C4 pathway is operative in the terrestrial form
(Fig. 2C). However, the culms of the terrestrial form of E. vivipara show slightly more negative
13C
values than those of other Eleocharis spp. with Kranz
anatomy (Ueno et al., 1988
, 1989
). An inhibitor of PEPC,
3,3-dichloro-2-(dihydroxyphosphinoylmethyl)- propenoate
(Jenkins, 1989
), does not completely suppress photosynthesis in the
terrestrial form, despite the fact that it completely inhibits photosynthesis of a typical C4 species of
Fimbristylis (O. Ueno and K. Ishimaru, unpublished data).
Thus, some CO2 may be fixed by Rubisco (probably
through the C3 cycle) present in the MC, even
though most CO2 is fixed through the
C4 pathway. Such features are reminiscent of
those of C4-like plants of Flaveria
spp. (Cheng et al., 1989
), but they may not be identical, because in
E. vivipara PEPC and NAD-ME are compartmentalized between
the MC and the BSC. In the submerged form the MC are the main
photosynthetic tissues, because of the reduction of the BSC. In the MC
of the submerged form, both PEPC and Rubisco are present, but the
level of PEPC is low relative to that of Rubisco. Thus, it is
suggested that CO2 in water is fixed mainly by
Rubisco and the C3 cycle in the chloroplasts of
the MC (Fig. 2C; Ueno, 1996b
). Under water conditions of low carbon,
the proportion of 14C incorporated into
C4 compounds is higher than under conditions of
high carbon. However, the turnover of 14C in
C4 compounds is very slow (Ueno, 1998a
).
Therefore, it is thought that even though the ME-dependent
C4 cycle also operates in the submerged form, the
contribution to total carbon flux is not large. It is concluded that
cellular regulation of photosynthetic enzyme accumulation, the unusual
localization of Rubisco, and the anatomical differentiation of
photosynthetic tissues are the main factors responsible for the
expression of C3 and
C4 characteristics in E. vivipara
(Ueno, 1996a
, 1996b
).
| |
PLASTIC EXPRESSION OF C3 AND C4 CHARACTERISTICS IN E. VIVIPARA IN FLUCTUATING ENVIRONMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transfer experiments demonstrate that the two growth forms of
E. vivipara can change reversibly into one another. When
submerged plants are exposed to air, the culms wither from the rapid
drying. However, plants produce new culms, which possess both Kranz
anatomy and the C4 biochemical traits. When
terrestrial plants are immersed in water, the plants develop new culms
with intermediate characteristics and finally with
C3 characteristics. It takes several weeks for the switch from the submerged to the terrestrial form and several months for the reverse change (Ueno et al., 1988
). When the submerged form is growing underwater, the tips of the culms often reach the water
surface. The plants then develop aerial culms at these tips, together
with culms floating at the water surface. The aerial culms possess both
Kranz anatomy and C4 biochemical traits, despite the fact that the underwater culms have non-Kranz anatomy and C3 characteristics. The floating culms show
intermediate anatomies between Kranz and non-Kranz types. Therefore, it
appears that different photosynthetic modes operate within a single
plant and between joined tissues in contrasting environments.
Therefore, plants growing in habitats with fluctuating water levels may
possess various culms with different anatomical and biochemical
features. It seems that the environmental response of E. vivipara represents a very plastic expression of
C3 and C4 characteristics
accompanied by tissue differentiation within a single plant.
| |
HORMONAL REGULATION OF C3 AND C4 DIFFERENTIATION IN E. VIVIPARA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heterophylly in aquatic plants is controlled by various
environmental and hormonal factors (Smith and Hake, 1992
). Although abscisic acid (ABA) is considered to be a stress hormone in plants, there is evidence that it is involved in the determination of leaf
identity in some heterophyllic aquatic plants (Goliber and Feldman,
1989
). It is thought that when plant shoots emerge from underwater into
the air, the concomitant osmotic stress and higher light levels induce
ABA production, which leads to the development of aerial leaves
(Goliber and Feldman, 1989
). In fact, when submerged E. vivipara are grown in an aqueous solution of ABA, they begin to
develop new culms with Kranz anatomy (Ueno, 1998a
). The ABA-induced tissues have several times more C4 enzyme
activity than have tissues of untreated submerged plants and accumulate
large amounts of C4 enzymes at the appropriate
cellular sites (Fig. 3C). They exhibit a C4-like
pattern of 14C fixation under aqueous conditions
of low carbon, indicating enhanced C4 capacity in
the tissues (Ueno, 1998a
). These facts imply that in E. vivipara ABA acts as a trigger for the regulatory cascade of
complex developmental processes that lead to the formation of Kranz
anatomy and C4 biochemical characteristics (Fig.
4).
|
ABA has been reported to induce CAM in some facultative CAM plants (Chu
et al., 1990
; McElwain et al., 1992
; Edwards et al., 1996
; Taybi and
Cushman, 1999
). However, no stimulatory effects of ABA on
C4 enzymes have been observed in maize (Sugiharto
et al., 1992
), C4 species of Flaveria,
or the obligate CAM species Kalanchoë daigremontiana
(Chu et al., 1990
). It would be interesting to examine whether a
similar signaling system that leads to changes in photosynthetic
metabolism in response to environmental stimuli and that is mediated by
ABA might have evolved simultaneously in facultative CAM species and
E. vivipara (Ueno, 1998a
). The induction of PEPC and NADP-ME
by ABA has also been reported in a submerged aquatic plant,
Egeria densa, which expresses C4
metabolism under high temperature and light conditions, which limit
CO2 availability (Casati et al., 2000
).
There is no evidence that a single gene is capable of setting in motion
the entire C4 machinery. Thus,
C4 photosynthesis appears to be a combination of
independently inherited characteristics (Brown and Bouton, 1993
). Our
understanding of the molecular basis of the control of
C4 differentiation is still limited. However, transcriptional regulators suggesting a specific role in the
differentiation of cell types of maize leaves have recently been
reported (Hall et al., 1998
; Rossini et al., 2001
). When gibberellic
acid is exogenously applied to terrestrial E. vivipara
plants, the plants develop new tissues, without stomata, that are
similar to the non-Kranz type tissues of submerged plants.
Nevertheless, the tissues show a high accumulation of
C4 enzymes (Fig. 4; O. Ueno and M. Kai,
unpublished data). This fact suggests that in E. vivipara, the structural and biochemical characteristics of
C4 photosynthesis are not always differentiated
in a coordinated manner, implying that separate signaling systems are
responsible for the individual differentiation of structural and
biochemical characteristics. Similar results have also been observed in
differentiation of these characteristics during the transition from the
terrestrial to the submerged form (Uchino et al., 1998
).
| |
EXPRESSION OF C3 AND C4 PHOTOSYNTHETIC GENES IN E. VIVIPARA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is intriguing to address how C3 and
C4 differentiation is regulated within E. vivipara at the molecular level. At present, this molecular basis
remains to be uncovered, but the isolation and expression analysis of
several genes encoding C3 and
C4 enzymes have been performed (Agarie et al.,
1997a
, 1997b
; Baba et al., 1997
; Uchino et al., 1998
). It is thought
that the difference in levels of C3 and
C4 enzymes between the two growth forms of E. vivipara is regulated largely at a transcriptional level
of the corresponding genes (Agarie et al., 1997a
, 1997b
; Baba et al.,
1997
; Uchino et al., 1998
). This is clearly observed in plants growing
under semi-submerged and semi-aerial conditions; the underwater culms
show lower expression of genes for PEPC and PPDK, whereas the aerial
culms show enhanced expression of the genes. The culms floating at the
water surface reveal intermediate expression of the genes (Agarie et
al., 1997b
). The intercellular patterns of expression of genes for
PEPC, PPDK, and the large and small subunits of Rubisco correspond well
with the patterns of accumulation of the enzyme proteins (Baba et al.,
1997
; Uchino et al., 1998
).
The kinetic properties of PEPC in E. vivipara differ between
the terrestrial and submerged forms. The Km
for phosphoenolpyruvate of the terrestrial form's PEPC is
intermediate between those of typical C3 and
C4 plants, whereas that of the submerged form's PEPC is C3-like (O. Ueno, unpublished data). It
is possible that several isogenes for PEPC are expressed in E. vivipara, as is the case in other plants (Cushman et al., 1989
;
Kawamura et al., 1992
; Westhoff et al., 1997
), and that the expression
patterns of respective isogenes differ between the terrestrial and
submerged forms. Recently, a gene for PEPC, which probably encodes a
PEPC expressed most strongly in the terrestrial form, has been isolated (Agarie et al., 1997b
). Homology research shows that this PEPC is
located between a cluster of C4-form PEPCs from
C4 grasses and a cluster consisting of
C3-form PEPCs from C3 and
C4 species and a CAM-form PEPC from the
facultative CAM species M. crystallinum.
Although a gene for chloroplastic PPDK is strongly expressed in the
leaves of C4 plants (Sheen, 1999
), a gene for
cytosolic PPDK and a gene for chloroplastic PPDK are simultaneously
expressed in the culms of E. vivipara (Agarie et al.,
1997a
). Both genes are more strongly expressed in the terrestrial form
than in the submerged form. In the terrestrial form, the gene for
chloroplastic PPDK is more highly expressed than the other gene,
whereas in the submerged form, the reverse trend is found. In general,
cytosolic PPDK seems to be involved in functions other than
photosynthesis (Moons et al., 1998
). However, it has recently been
reported that in some CAM plants, both chloroplastic and cytosolic
PPDKs are accumulated in the leaves (Kondo et al., 2000
). In the
facultative CAM plant Kalanchoë blossfeldiana,
coordinated accumulation of both PPDKs is observed during enhanced CAM
expression, suggesting that they are involved in CAM function (Kondo et
al., 2001
). At present, it is not known whether the unusual pattern of
PPDK expression in E. vivipara is related to its unique
C3/C4 property.
The ABA-induced culms of the submerged plants exhibit high expression
of the genes for PEPC and PPDK. When culms formed before ABA treatment
of submerged plants (which lack Kranz anatomy) are exposed to ABA
solution, they also exhibit high expression of the genes for PEPC and
PPDK (Agarie et al., 1997b
). Thus, it seems again that expression of
these genes can occur without coordinated differentiation of Kranz anatomy.
| |
VARIATION IN EXPRESSION OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC MODES IN AMPHIBIOUS SPECIES OF ELEOCHARIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the genus Eleocharis, two other amphibious species,
Eleocharis baldwinii and Eleocharis retroflexa
subsp. chaetaria, show C4
characteristics in their terrestrial forms (Ueno et al., 1989
). The
responses of these species to aquatic environments differ from that of
E. vivipara (Table I; Uchino
et al., 1995
; Ueno et al., 1998
).
|
The terrestrial forms of E. baldwinii and E. retroflexa possess structural and biochemical characteristics of
the NAD-ME-type C4 plant (Table I). The culms
also exhibit unusual Kranz anatomy in which the mestome sheath is
interposed between the MC and the BSC. The chloroplasts of the MC, as
well as those of the BSC, accumulate Rubisco, but less than in E. vivipara (Ueno, 2000
). Consistent with the enzyme distribution,
the
13C values of the terrestrial forms of
E. baldwinii and E. retroflexa are less negative
than those of E. vivipara, although the values of the three
species are within C4 range (Ueno et al., 1989
). The activities of the C4 enzymes in the
terrestrial forms of all three amphibious species are high, ranging in
the following order: E. vivipara less than E. baldwinii less than E. retroflexa. The inhibitory
effects of 3,3-dichloro-2-(dihydroxyphosphinoylmethyl)-propenoate on photosynthesis also show the same trend. Thus, the terrestrial forms of E. baldwinii and E. retroflexa also
differ from typical C4 plants, and there is a
gradient in the degree of expression of C4
characteristics among the terrestrial forms of the three species.
When E. baldwinii is growing under submerged conditions, it
develops culms with traits intermediate between
C3 and C4 biochemistry (Uchino et al., 1995
). The BSC become small, and the MC develop well.
In the MC, the amount of Rubisco becomes higher than that in the
terrestrial form, and the amount of PEPC becomes lower (Ueno, 2000
).
Despite a decrease in NAD-ME activity, NADP-ME activity is maintained
or slightly increased in the submerged form. There is evidence that a
Kranz-less C4 metabolism is operative in some submerged aquatic plants such as Hydrilla and
Egeria spp. (Bowes and Salvucci, 1989
; Reiskind et al.,
1997
; Casati et al., 2000
). A possible unicellular
C4 metabolism has recently been reported in a
marine diatom, Thalassiosira weissflogii (Reinfelder et al., 2000
). In Hydrilla spp. and Egeria spp., enhanced
expression of NADP-ME is observed during induction of
C4 metabolism (Magnin et al., 1997
; Casati et
al., 2000
). It would be interesting to examine whether the submerged
form of E. baldwinii fixes some CO2
through a similar C4 metabolism. In contrast,
E. retroflexa essentially maintains C4
characteristics even underwater; the culms of the submerged form have
both Kranz-like anatomy and C4 biochemical
characteristics (Ueno et al., 1998
). Therefore, its features resemble
those of some aquatic C4 grasses in the
Orcuttieae (Keeley, 1998
). Also, in the submerged form of E. retroflexa, the level of Rubisco in the MC is slightly higher than
in the terrestrial form (O. Ueno, unpublished data).
We may well ask why there is variation in the growth-form-specific
expression of photosynthetic modes among the amphibious species of
Eleocharis. This might be partly explained by the difference in the degree of C4 expression in the terrestrial
forms. From taxonomic study of the photosynthetic modes of
Eleocharis spp. it seems that C4
photosynthesis evolved relatively recently in the genus, generating
various intermediate stages (Ueno et al., 1989
). According to this
scenario, it appears that the terrestrial form of E. vivipara represents an evolutionary stage that is somewhat less
advanced toward a full C4 syndrome than the
terrestrial forms of the other two species. This may facilitate the
intriguingly plastic expression of photosynthetic modes seen in
E. vivipara in contrasting environments.
| |
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is ample evidence to suggest that C4
photosynthesis evolved from C3 photosynthesis in
parallel among diverse taxonomic groups, thereby, generating extensive
diversity in the structural, biochemical, and developmental aspects of
C4 photosynthesis among present-day species
(Sheen, 1999
; Freitag and Stichler, 2000
; Edwards et al., 2001
). These
include some C3-C4
intermediate species of Flaveria that have been useful in
elucidating the sequence of events during the evolution in the mode of
photosynthesis (Ku et al., 1991
). However, the E. vivipara,
which has retained its ability to switch between
C3 and C4 mode of
photosynthesis depending upon environmental conditions, provides an
attractive opportunity to investigate the developmental process from
C3 to C4 photosynthesis in
its totality.
We still do not understand the molecular mechanism(s) that brings about
the switching between photosynthetic modes in E. vivipara. A
comparative study of the signaling mechanisms involved in the expression of photosynthetic traits in E. vivipara,
facultative CAM plants (Edwards et al., 1996
; Taybi and Cushman, 1999
),
and some submerged aquatic plants (Magnin et al., 1997
; Casati et al.,
2000
) might be of help in determining the universality and/or diversity
of the underlying molecular mechanisms. One of the salient features of
C4 photosynthesis is the differentiation of MC
and BSC. Although characterization of mutants from maize (Hall et al.,
1998
; Rossini et al., 2001
) and Arabidopsis (Kinsman and Pyke, 1998
)
can provide some insight into the mechanism, analyses of plants such as
E. vivipara and some C4 dicots that
develop cotyledons with a C3 mode (Voznesenskaya
et al., 1999
) may provide a better system to understand this process of
cell differentiation.
Undoubtedly, the amphibious species of Eleocharis are worth
studying if we are to expand our knowledge of the ecological and adaptive aspects of C4 plants. We still do not
know the adaptive significance of the alteration of the photosynthetic
characteristics of E. vivipara from C4
to C3 and of E. baldwinii from
C4 to
C3-C4 intermediate when
these plants are grown underwater. Further research of the amphibious
species of Eleocharis, Hydrilla (Reiskind et al., 1997
), and
aquatic C4 grasses (Keeley, 1998
) may contribute toward a deeper understanding not only of the diversity of
photosynthetic metabolism in aquatic environments but also of
evolutionary significance of C4 photosynthesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I am grateful to Dr. Sanjay Kapoor for a critical reading of the manuscript and to an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received August 28, 2001; returned for revision September 9, 2001; accepted September 14, 2001.
1 This study was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (grant-in aid no. BDP-01-I-1-6).
* E-mail uenoos{at}nias.affrc.go.jp; fax 81-298-38-7408.
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010704.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Hinchliff and E. H. Roalson Stem architecture in Eleocharis subgenus Limnochloa (Cyperaceae): Evidence of dynamic morphological evolution in a group of pantropical sedges Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1487 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Besnard, A. M. Muasya, F. Russier, E. H. Roalson, N. Salamin, and P.-A. Christin Phylogenomics of C4 Photosynthesis in Sedges (Cyperaceae): Multiple Appearances and Genetic Convergence Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2009; 26(8): 1909 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Patel and J. O. Berry Rubisco gene expression in C4 plants J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1625 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Baksh and J. H. Richards An architectural model for Eleocharis: morphology and development of Eleocharis cellulosa (Cyperaceae) Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2006; 93(5): 707 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. MOMMER and E. J. W. VISSER Underwater Photosynthesis in Flooded Terrestrial Plants: A Matter of Leaf Plasticity Ann. Bot., September 1, 2005; 96(4): 581 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Ueno, S. W. Bang, Y. Wada, A. Kondo, K. Ishihara, Y. Kaneko, and Y. Matsuzawa Structural and Biochemical Dissection of Photorespiration in Hybrids Differing in Genome Constitution between Diplotaxis tenuifolia (C3-C4) and Radish (C3) Plant Physiology, July 1, 2003; 132(3): 1550 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|