|
Plant Physiol, January 2002, Vol. 128, pp. 194-200
Phytochrome E Controls Light-Induced Germination of
Arabidopsis1
Lars
Hennig,2
Wendy M.
Stoddart,
Monika
Dieterle,
Garry
C.
Whitelam, and
Eberhard
Schäfer*
Institut für Biologie II, Universität Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany (L.H., M.D., E.S.); and Department of Biology,
Leicester University, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom (G.C.W.,
W.M.S.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Germination of Arabidopsis seeds is light dependent and
under phytochrome control. Previously, phytochromes A and B and at least one additional, unspecified phytochrome were shown to be involved
in this process. Here, we used a set of photoreceptor mutants to test
whether phytochrome D and/or phytochrome E can control germination of
Arabidopsis. The results show that only phytochromes B and E, but not
phytochrome D, participate directly in red/far-red light
(FR)-reversible germination. Unlike phytochromes B and D, phytochrome E
did not inhibit phytochrome A-mediated germination. Surprisingly,
phytochrome E was required for germination of Arabidopsis seeds in
continuous FR. However, inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by FR,
induction of cotyledon unfolding, and induction of agravitropic growth
were not affected by loss of phytochrome E. Therefore, phytochrome E is
not required per se for phytochrome A-mediated very low fluence
responses and the high irradiance response. Immunoblotting revealed
that the need of phytochrome E for germination in FR was not caused by
altered phytochrome A levels. These results uncover a novel role of
phytochrome E in plant development and demonstrate the considerable
functional diversification of the closely related phytochromes B, D,
and E.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In many plants, seed germination is
light dependent (Casal and Sánchez, 1998 ). Among plant
photoreceptors, only phytochromes have been shown to directly mediate
induction of germination. Recently, several new insights into the
molecular mechanisms of phytochrome action and its physiological role
throughout the whole life cycle of plants were achieved (for review,
see Whitelam and Devlin, 1997 ; Casal, 2000 ; Smith, 2000 ). In
Arabidopsis, phytochrome is a small gene family, consisting of the five
members, PHYA to PHYE (Sharrock and Quail, 1989 ;
Clack et al., 1994 ). PHYB, PHYD, and
PHYE are evolutionary related and clearly separated from
PHYA and PHYC (Mathews and Sharrock., 1997 ).
Studies using mutants and overexpressor lines demonstrated that
individual phytochrome family members have overlapping and distinct
functions (Reed et al., 1994 ; Smith et al., 1997 ). phyA and phyB are
the best characterized phytochromes in Arabidopsis. phyA mediates the
high irradiance response in far red light (FR; FR-HIR) and the very low
fluence response (VLFR), which can also be induced by FR. In contrast, phyB mediates the red light (R)/FR-reversible low fluence response (LFR; Casal et al., 1998 ). Less is known about the other phytochromes. An LFR-type action of phyD could be observed in phyB
seedlings (Aukerman et al., 1997 ; Hennig et al., 1999a ). The high
sequence identity of phyB and phyD (>80%) suggests very similar roles
of these two phytochromes, albeit certain physiological differences have been reported (Hennig et al., 1999a ). Finally, for phyE, mainly
functions in the shade avoidance syndrome of adult plants have been
described (Devlin et al., 1996 , 1998 ). Furthermore, phyE has been shown
to be capable of signaling to the circadian clock in seedlings (Devlin
and Kay, 2000 ).
Light-induced germination has been studied extensively in Arabidopsis
(for review, see Casal and Sánchez, 1998 ). This work revealed
that induction of germination by R is mediated by phyB and phyA,
whereas induction by FR is mediated only by phyA (Shinomura et al.,
1996 , 1998 ). Casal and coworkers demonstrated that phyA induces
germination when acting in the VLFR mode. In contrast, continuous FR
effectively opposes germination in many plant species, although not in
Arabidopsis (Botto et al., 1996 ; Casal and Sánchez, 1998 ).
Moreover, both phyB and phyD have been shown to interfere with
phyA-mediated induction of germination by FR (Hennig et al., 2001 ).
However, phyA and phyB are clearly not the only phytochromes participating in light-induced germination. R/FR-reversible induction of germination was observed in phyA phyB double mutants
(Poppe and Schäfer, 1997 ). Nonetheless, it has remained
completely unknown which other phytochromes are involved in this
reaction. Here, we used additional phyD and phyE
photoreceptor mutant combinations to investigate phytochrome-mediated
germination in Arabidopsis in more detail.
 |
RESULTS |
Poppe and Schäfer (1997) observed R/FR-reversible induction
of germination in phyA phyB double mutants. Using the
original light regime of hourly pulses for 3 d, we analyzed
additional photoreceptor mutants (Fig.
1). Wild-type (WT) seeds germinated efficiently in continuous white light (W) and after R pulses (30 s, 39 µmol m 2 s 1) but
germinated poorly in darkness and after long wavelength FR (3 min, 35 µmol m 2 s 1) or R/FR
pulses. As demonstrated before (Poppe and Schäfer, 1997 ),
germination of phyA phyB double mutants did not differ from
WT under these conditions. Likewise, phyA phyB cry1 and
phyA phyB phyD triple mutants behaved in a very similar way
to WT, except for less efficient germination of phyA phyB
phyD in W. Moreover, phyE mutants showed an unaltered
germination. In contrast, basically no light-inducible germination
could be observed for seeds of phyA phyB phyE triple
mutants.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Induction of germination by light pulses. After
sowing, seeds were incubated for 24 h at 4°C in darkness,
followed by continuous W or hourly pulses of the indicated light
quality at 25°C for 3 d. Germination frequencies were determined
after further incubation for 3 d in darkness (D).
|
|
Induction of germination by FR depends on phyA and is inhibited by phyB
and phyD (Hennig et al., 2001 ). Because phyB, phyD, and phyE are
evolutionary closely related, we tested the influence of phyE on
phyA-mediated germination in FR. Seeds were incubated for 24 h at
4°C in darkness; after treatment with indicated light qualities for
3 h, the seeds were stored at 25°C in darkness for 3 d. In
agreement with previous reports, only R lead to high germination rates
in WT and phyA under these conditions (Fig.
2). In contrast, FR and R followed by FR
were as efficient as R in inducing germination of phyB. For
phyD, FR and R/FR were slightly less effective than R. Seeds
of the phyA phyB double mutant germinated poorly under all
light conditions. Importantly, phyE seeds did not germinate appreciably after FR or R/FR and thus behaved like WT rather than phyB or phyD.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Induction of germination by light periods of
3 h. After sowing, seeds were incubated for 24 h at 4°C in
darkness, followed by a treatment at 25°C with R or FR for 3 h
or with R for 3 h, followed by FR for 3 h (R/FR). Germination
frequencies were determined after further incubation for 6 d in
darkness (D).
|
|
To further characterize the role of phyE in germination, we analyzed
induction of germination by continuous irradiation in more detail.
Seeds were incubated for 24 h at 4°C in darkness. After
treatment with indicated light qualities for 3 d, seeds were
stored at 25°C in darkness for another 3 d. Continuous
irradiation with W, blue (B), R, or FR for 3 d induced high
germination frequencies in WT (Fig. 3).
In contrast, phyA seeds germinated poorly after B and not at
all after FR treatment. Germination of phyB and
phyD was indistinguishable from WT. Seeds of the phyA
phyB double mutant germinated after neither B nor FR treatment.
Surprisingly, phyE seeds behaved in a very similar way to
phyA; germination after B was impaired and after FR it was
completely abolished. These results indicate a requirement of phyE for
phyA-mediated induction of germination under continuous FR. Similarly,
the phyA phyE double mutant germinated to a low extent after
B and barely after FR. Finally, the phyA phyB phyE triple
mutant completely failed to show light-inducible germination under
these conditions.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Induction of germination by continuous light.
After sowing, seeds were incubated for 24 h at 4°C and for
24 h at 25°C in darkness, followed by a treatment with the
indicated light quality at 25°C for 3 d. Germination frequencies
were determined after further incubation for 3 d in darkness
(D).
|
|
The requirement of phyE on germination in FR might be caused by altered
phyA levels in phyE seeds. To test this hypothesis, we
analyzed total phyA amounts by immunoblotting. Total
protein (25 µg) extracted from seeds, which had been allowed
to imbibe in darkness for 24 h at 4°C and for 24 h at
25°C was used. No signal was detected in phyA mutant
seeds. Importantly, WT and phyE contained similar phyA
levels (Fig. 4). Thus, the inability of
phyE seeds to germinate under FR is not caused by strongly decreased phyA amounts.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Contents of phyA in Arabidopsis seeds after
storage for 24 h at 4°C and for 24 h at 25°C in darkness.
Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting of 25 µg of protein and
probing with an antiserum against phyA.
|
|
Subsequently, we tested whether phyE is also required for other
phyA-mediated processes. To this end, seedlings were
exposed to hourly FR pulses (36 µmol
m 2 s 1) or continuous FR
(3 µmol m 2 s 1). After
5 d cotyledon opening angles were measured. The results are shown
in Figure 5. Both FR pulses and
continuous FR induced a strong opening of cotyledons in WT and
phyE but failed to do so in phyA. Therefore, only
phyA but not phyE is required for induction of cotyledon opening in
Arabidopsis. Another well-documented response of phyA is its
interference with the negative gravitropism of seedling growth. Here,
we measured the randomization of growth orientation after 3 d in
darkness (Fig. 6A) or after exposure to
hourly FR pulses (10 µmol m 2
s 1) for 3 d (Fig. 6B). In darkness, >60%
of all seedlings (WT, phyA, and phyE) differed
<10 degrees from the vertical. Seedlings of WT and phyE,
which were treated with FR pulses, displayed a wide range of hypocotyl
angles, reflecting agravitropism. In contrast, phyA
seedlings treated with FR pulses remained predominantly
vertical.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Induction of cotyledon opening by FR. After
induction of germination, seeds were exposed either to hourly FR pulses
of 5 min (36 µmol m 2
s 1; light-gray bars) or to continuous FR (3 µmol m 2 s 1; dark-gray
bars). After 5 d, seedlings were photographed and measurements
were taken.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Suppression of gravitropic growth by FR. After
induction of germination, seeds were kept in darkness (A) or exposed to
hourly FR pulses of 5 min (10 µmol m 2
s 1; B). Growth orientation of at least 60 seedlings was determined after 3 d. Displayed are frequencies of
seedlings with angles falling into the indicated ranges (light-gray
bars, < 60 or >+60 degrees; dark-gray bars, < 10 or > +10
degrees; black bars, 0 ± 10 degrees).
|
|
Next, we tested whether phyE might effect growth under FR, either by
positive or by negative interference with phyA action. Seedlings of WT,
phyA, and phyE were exposed to hourly FR pulses (36 µmol m 2 s 1) or
continuous FR (3 µmol m 2
s 1). After 5 d hypocotyl lengths were
measured. The results (Fig. 7A) show that
WT and phyE seedlings did not differ either under FR pulses
or under continuous FR. In contrast, phyA seedlings remained
elongated under both conditions. Interaction of photoreceptors can be
observed more easily under nonsaturating conditions (Hennig et al.,
2001 ). Consequently, seedlings of WT, phyA, phyB,
phyD, and phyE were grown under nonsaturating
continuous FR (0.6 µmol m 2
s 1). WT seedlings showed an inhibition of
elongation of about 40% under these conditions (Fig. 7B). In contrast,
growth of phyB mutants was inhibited by >50%. Nonetheless,
neither phyD nor phyE differed from the
WT.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in FR. A, After
induction of germination, seeds were exposed either to hourly FR pulses
of 5 min (36 µmol m 2
s 1; light-gray bars) or to continuous FR (3 µmol m 2 s 1; dark-gray
bars). After 5 d, seedlings were photographed and measurements
were taken. B, After induction of germination, seeds were exposed to
0.6 µmol m 2 s 1 FR.
Hypocotyl lengths of at least 25 seedlings were determined after 3 d.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Induction of germination by light is controlled by phyA and phyB
(Shinomura et al., 1996 ). However, in addition to these two photoreceptors other pigments have been shown to be involved in this
process. R/FR-reversible germination of phyA phyB double mutants led to the conclusion that at least one other member of the
phytochrome family controls germination in Arabidopsis (Poppe and
Schäfer, 1997 ). Moreover, no reports about a possible involvement of other photoreceptors, e.g. cryptochromes, exist. To determine the
role of additional phytochromes in germination, we used several photoreceptor single, double, and triple mutant combinations.
phyE Controls R/FR-Reversible Germination in phyA
phyB
A program of hourly light pulses applied for 3 d induced
R/FR-reversible germination in phyA phyB double mutants.
Both, phyA phyB phyD and phyA phyB cry1 triple
mutants displayed the same pattern of germination. Therefore, neither
phyD nor cry1 are required for germination under these conditions.
Given the high sequence conservation of phyB and phyD, it was
surprising that absence of phyD did not further impair R-induced
germination. Under none of the diverse conditions tested was any direct
demonstration of germination control by phyD obtained. In contrast,
phyA phyB phyE triple mutants were severely impaired in
light-induced germination and lacked any R/FR-reversible germination.
We conclude, therefore, that phyE plays an active role in germination
of Arabidopsis. If any additional photoreceptors were involved in this
process, they clearly depend on the presence of at least one of phyA,
phyB, or phyE. Moreover, the R/FR-reversible nature of induction of germination by phyE implies that this phytochrome can function in the
LFR mode of phytochrome action.
The similar actions of phyB and phyE in germination prompted us to
investigate negative effects of these phytochromes on phyA action.
Previously, we described inhibition of phyA-mediated germination by
phyB and phyD (Hennig et al., 2001 ). However, we were not able to
detect any negative interference of phyE with phyA function. This
difference could be due to different expression levels of phyB, phyD,
and phyE. Alternatively, it could reflect inherent mechanistic
differences in the biological actions of these phytochromes.
phyE Is Required for Germination in Continuous FR but Not for
Other phyA Responses
In addition to its involvement in germination after pulsed
irradiations, phyE proved to affect germination in continuous light. Surprisingly, phyE was required for induction of germination by continuous FR. This observation was not expected, because phyA is
generally regarded as being both necessary and sufficient for effects
of FR. Responses of phyA to FR are usually attributed to either the
VLFR or the HIR mode of phytochrome action (Casal et al., 1998 ). We
analyzed the consequences of phyE deficiency on additional responses of
either the VLFR or HIR type. None of three other VLFR reactions
(namely, induction of cotyledon opening, interference with
gravitropism, and growth inhibition by FR pulses) was altered in
phyE mutants. Further experiments showed that phyE was also
not required for control of hypocotyl growth under continuous FR
involving an HIR. However, phyE also had no negative influence on
inhibition of hypocotyl elongation by intermediate fluence rates of FR.
In this respect, phyE behaves like phyD and not like phyB, which
counteracts the FR-HIR (Hennig et al., 1999b ). Therefore, only
germination under FR, but not all phyA-mediated responses to FR, depend
on the presence of phyE.
Immunoblots showed that the amount of phyA in seeds is not influenced
by the presence or absence of phyE. Consequently, the failure of
phyE seeds to germinate under FR is not caused by reduced phyA levels. Several other mechanisms could account for the behavior of
the phyE mutant. phyE might control the level of signaling intermediates required by phyA for inducing germination. Alternatively, phyE might act as an additional photoreceptor for FR. In this regard,
it is noteworthy that a recent report described profound differences
between the photochemical properties of phyB and phyE (Eichenberg et
al., 2000 ). Further investigations will be required to resolve this issue.
The Physiological Roles of phyB, phyD, and phyE Differ
Considerably
The three closely related photoreceptors phyB, phyD, and phyE have
been shown to be involved in responses to R/FR (Devlin et al., 1998 ,
1999 ). All three phyB-like phytochromes can function in the LFR mode of
phytochrome action. Moreover, they are all capable of signaling to the
circadian clock (Devlin and Kay, 2000 ). For phyB and phyD, but not for
phyE, an involvement in control of hypocotyl elongation has been shown
(Reed et al., 1993 ; Aukerman et al., 1997 ; Hennig et al., 1999a ). Here,
we report that phyB and phyE, but not phyD, participate in
R/FR-reversible germination. Poppe and Schäfer (1997)
demonstrated that the photobiology of induction of germination by phyE,
termed phyX by these authors, differed greatly from that of phyB:
Requirement of prolonged irradiation and fluence rate response curves
were more similar to an HIR than to the classical LFR. Likewise, the
loss-of-reversibility kinetics were much faster for the phyE than for
the phyB response (Poppe and Schäfer, 1997 ). Our results show
that phyB and phyE also have opposing effects. Whereas phyB exerts an
inhibitory action on a diverse set of phyA functions under FR,
including germination (Hennig et al., 2001 ), phyE is required for
germination under FR. Taken together, phyB is more similar to phyD than
to phyE regarding interference with phyA-mediated germination. In
contrast, phyB is more similar to phyE than to phyD regarding positive
control of germination after R pulses. Hence, the physiological
functions of the closely related phyB, phyD, and phyE are only partly
redundant but differ in several aspects.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material, Growth Conditions, and Light Sources
The Landsberg erecta (Ler) ecotype
of Arabidopsis (L.) Heynh. was used (obtained from Lehle Seeds, Tuscon,
AZ). The mutants were phyA-201 (Nagatani et al., 1993 ;
Reed et al., 1994 ), phyB-5 (Koornneef et
al., 1980 ; Reed et al., 1993 ), phyD-1
(Aukerman et al., 1997 ), phyE-1 (Devlin et al., 1998 ),
and hy4-2.23n (containing a defect CRY1
gene, Koornneef et al., 1980 ; Ahmad and Cashmore, 1993 ). Double and
triple mutants were generated by crossing (Devlin et al., 1998 , 1999 ;
Hennig et al., 1999a ).
Seeds were plated on four layers of water-soaked filter paper, which
were placed into clear plastic boxes. A 24-h dark treatment at 4°C
was followed by induction of germination by the light quality and
duration indicated in Figures 1 to 4 and 7B. Subsequently, samples were further incubated in the dark at 25°C. Standard B (436 nm, 35 µmol m 2 s 1), R (656 nm, 30 µmol
m 2 s 1), or FR (730 nm, 20 µmol
m 2 s 1) fields were used. Repetitive pulse
irradiation with monochromatic light was achieved using
computer-controlled Leitz Prado light projectors (Leitz,
Wetzlar, Germany) with 660 nm of DAL interference filters or RG9
color glasses (Schott, Mainz, Germany). Alternatively, seeds were sown
onto plates (0.8% agar Lehle medium, Lehle Seeds) and chilled at 4°C
for 3 d. Germination was induced by 30 min of white fluorescent
light (80 µmol m 2 s 1), and plates were
incubated in the dark at 22°C for 24 h, after which irradiation
was started (Figs. 5, 6, and 7A).
Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting
Seeds were ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted with
preheated SDS sample buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 4 M urea, 3% [w/v] SDS, 10% [v/v] glycerol, 10 mM dithioerythritol, 0.05% [w/v] bromphenol
blue). After heating to 95°C for 5 min, the crude extracts were
clarified by centrifugation for 15 min at 20,000g
(25°C).
SDS-PAGE, protein blotting, and immunodetection were performed as
described by Harter et al. (1993) using CSPD-STAR (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA) as the substrate for alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies against phyA of Arabidopsis were a generous gift of P. Quail (Albany, CA; Hirschfeld et al., 1998 ).
Determination of Hypocotyl Length and Germination
Frequencies
Hypocotyl lengths were measured manually for at
least 20 seedlings. The mean value and SE from at least
three independent experiments (Fig. 7B) or the results of one
representative experiment are shown (Fig. 7A). Significant differences
of hypocotyl lengths of dark-grown seedlings were not observed (data
not shown). Germination percentages of 80 to 120 seeds were determined
by taking the protrusion of the radicle as the criterion of
germination. The mean value and SE of at least four
independent experiments are shown. At least two independent seed
batches per mutant were used for germination experiments.
Determination of Hypocotyl Growth Orientation
Seeds were sown onto plates (1.2% agar Lehle medium, Lehle
Seeds) and chilled at 4°C for 3 d. Germination was induced by 30 min of white fluorescent light (80 µmol m 2
s 1), and plates were orientated vertically and incubated
in the dark at 22°C for 24 h, after which irradiation was
started. Plates were maintained at a vertical orientation throughout.
After 3 d of treatments, plates were photographed, and
measurements were taken of at least 60 (dark control) or 100 seedlings.
The angles of hypocotyls relative to vertical were recorded, resulting
in values from 0 (vertical) to ±180 degrees.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Peter H. Quail for the antiserum against phyA. We thank
Dr. Trish Ingles for help with the experiments on growth orientation.
Furthermore, we thank Rena Wiehe for excellent technical assistance and
Claudia Büche for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received June 25, 2001; returned for revision July 28, 2001; accepted August 12, 2001.
1
This work was supported by Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. SFB592 to E.S.).
2
Present address: Institut für
Pflanzenwissenschaften, Eidgenössische Technische
Hochschule Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail schaegen{at}ruf.uni-freiburg.de; fax
49-761-203-2629.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010559.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Ahmad M, Cashmore AR
(1993)
HY4 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor.
Nature
366: 162-166[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Aukerman MJ, Hirschfeld M, Wester L, Weaver M, Clack T, Amasino RM, Sharrock RA
(1997)
A deletion in the PHYD gene of the Arabidopsis Wassilewskija ecotype defines a role for phytochrome D in red/far-red light sensing.
Plant Cell
9: 1317-1326[Abstract]
-
Botto JF, Sanchez RA, Whitelam GC, Casal JJ
(1996)
Phytochrome A mediates the promotion of seed germination by very low fluences of light and canopy shade light in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol
110: 439-444[Abstract]
-
Casal JJ
(2000)
Phytochromes, cryptochromes, phototropin: photoreceptor interactions in plants.
Photochem Photobiol
71: 1-11[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Casal JJ, Sánchez RA
(1998)
Phytochromes and seed germination.
Seed Sci Res
8: 317-329
-
Casal JJ, Sánchez RA, Botto JF
(1998)
Modes of action of phytochromes.
J Exp Bot
49: 127-138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clack T, Mathews S, Sharrock RA
(1994)
The phytochrome apoprotein family in Arabidopsis is encoded by five genes: the sequences and expression of PHYD and PHYE.
Plant Mol Biol
25: 413-427[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Devlin PF, Halliday KJ, Harberd NP, Whitelam GC
(1996)
The rosette habit of Arabidopsis thaliana is dependent upon phytochrome action: Novel phytochromes control internode elongation and flowering time.
Plant J
10: 1127-1134[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Devlin PF, Kay SA
(2000)
Cryptochromes are required for phytochrome signaling to the circadian clock but not for rhythmicity.
Plant Cell
12: 2499-2510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Devlin PF, Patel SR, Whitelam GC
(1998)
Phytochrome E influences internode elongation and flowering time in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
10: 1479-1487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Devlin PF, Robson PRH, Patel SR, Goosey L, Sharrock R, Whitelam GC
(1999)
Phytochrome D acts in the shade-avoidance syndrome in Arabidopsis by controlling elongation growth and flowering time.
Plant Physiol
119: 909-915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eichenberg K, Bäurle I, Paulo N, Sharrock RA, Rüdiger W, Schäfer E
(2000)
Arabidopsis phytochromes C and E have different spectral characteristics from those of phytochromes A and B.
FEBS Lett
470: 107-112[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Harter K, Talke-Messerer C, Barz W, Schäfer E
(1993)
Light-dependent and sucrose-dependent gene expression in photomixotrophic cell suspension cultures and protoplasts of rape (Brassica napus L.).
Plant J
4: 507-516
-
Hennig L, Funk M, Whitelam GC, Schäfer E
(1999a)
Functional interaction of cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome D.
Plant J
20: 289-294[ISI][Medline]
-
Hennig L, Poppe C, Sweere U, Martin A, Schäfer E
(2001)
Negative interference of endogenous phytochrome B with phytochrome A function in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol
125: 1036-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hennig L, Poppe C, Unger S, Schäfer E
(1999b)
Control of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana by photoreceptor interaction.
Planta
208: 257-263[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Hirschfeld M, Tepperman JM, Clack T, Quail PH, Sharrock RA
(1998)
Coordination of phytochrome levels in phyB mutants of Arabidopsis as revealed by apoprotein-specific monoclonal antibodies.
Genetics
149: 523-535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koornneef M, Rolff E, Spruit CJP
(1980)
Genetic control of light-inhibited hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Z Pflanzenphysiol
100: 147-160
-
Mathews S, Sharrock RA
(1997)
Phytochrome gene diversity.
Plant Cell Environ
20: 666-671[CrossRef]
-
Nagatani A, Reed JW, Chory J
(1993)
Isolation and initial characterization of Arabidopsis mutants that are deficient in phytochrome A.
Plant Physiol
102: 269-277[Abstract]
-
Poppe C, Schäfer E
(1997)
Seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana phyA/phyB double mutants is under phytochrome control.
Plant Physiol
114: 1487-1492[Abstract]
-
Reed JW, Nagatani A, Elich TD, Fagan M, Chory J
(1994)
Phytochrome A and phytochrome B have overlapping but distinct functions in Arabidopsis development.
Plant Physiol
104: 1139-1149[Abstract]
-
Reed JW, Nagpal P, Poole DS, Furuya M, Chory J
(1993)
Mutations in the gene for the red-far-red light receptor phytochrome B alter cell elongation and physiological responses throughout Arabidopsis development.
Plant Cell
5: 147-157[Abstract]
-
Sharrock RA, Quail PH
(1989)
Novel phytochrome sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana: structure, evolution and differential expression of a plant regulatory photoreceptor family.
Genes Dev
3: 1745-1757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shinomura T, Hanzawa H, Schäfer E, Furuya M
(1998)
Mode of phytochrome B action in the photoregulation of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
13: 583-590[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Shinomura T, Nagatani A, Hanzawa H, Kubota M, Watanabe M, Furuya M
(1996)
Action spectra for phyto-chrome A- and B-specific photoinduction of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93: 8129-8133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith H
(2000)
Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants: an emerging synthesis.
Nature
407: 585-591[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Smith H, Xu Y, Quail PH
(1997)
Antagonistic but complementary actions of phytochromes A and B allow optimum seedling de-etiolation.
Plant Physiol
114: 637-641[Abstract]
-
Whitelam GC, Devlin PF
(1997)
Roles of different phytochromes in Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis.
Plant Cell Environ
20: 752-758[CrossRef]
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Laserna, R. A. Sanchez, and J. F. Botto
Light-related Loci Controlling Seed Germination in Ler x Cvi and Bay-0 x Sha Recombinant Inbred-line Populations of Arabidopsis thaliana
Ann. Bot.,
October 1, 2008;
102(4):
631 - 642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kneissl, T. Shinomura, M. Furuya, and C. Bolle
A Rice Phytochrome A in Arabidopsis: The Role of the N-terminus under red and far-red light
Mol Plant,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
84 - 102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-H. Meng, A. Macquet, O. Loudet, A. Marion-Poll, and H. M. North
Analysis of Natural Allelic Variation Controlling Arabidopsis thaliana Seed Germinability in Response to Cold and Dark: Identification of Three Major Quantitative Trait Loci
Mol Plant,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
145 - 154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Dreher and J. Callis
Ubiquitin, Hormones and Biotic Stress in Plants
Ann. Bot.,
May 1, 2007;
99(5):
787 - 822.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Oliverio, M. Crepy, E. L. Martin-Tryon, R. Milich, S. L. Harmer, J. Putterill, M. J. Yanovsky, and J. J. Casal
GIGANTEA Regulates Phytochrome A-Mediated Photomorphogenesis Independently of Its Role in the Circadian Clock
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2007;
144(1):
495 - 502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Oh, S. Yamaguchi, J. Hu, J. Yusuke, B. Jung, I. Paik, H.-S. Lee, T.-p. Sun, Y. Kamiya, and G. Choi
PIL5, a Phytochrome-Interacting bHLH Protein, Regulates Gibberellin Responsiveness by Binding Directly to the GAI and RGA Promoters in Arabidopsis Seeds
PLANT CELL,
April 1, 2007;
19(4):
1192 - 1208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mathews
Phytochrome Evolution in Green and Nongreen Plants
J. Hered.,
May 1, 2005;
96(3):
197 - 204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Correll and J. Z. Kiss
The Roles of Phytochromes in Elongation and Gravitropism of Roots
Plant Cell Physiol.,
February 1, 2005;
46(2):
317 - 323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Franklin and G. C. Whitelam
Light signals, phytochromes and cross-talk with other environmental cues
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 2, 2004;
55(395):
271 - 276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Monte, J. M. Alonso, J. R. Ecker, Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Young, S. Austin-Phillips, and P. H. Quail
Isolation and Characterization of phyC Mutants in Arabidopsis Reveals Complex Crosstalk between Phytochrome Signaling Pathways
PLANT CELL,
September 1, 2003;
15(9):
1962 - 1980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mathews, J. G. Burleigh, and M. J. Donoghue
Adaptive Evolution in the Photosensory Domain of Phytochrome A in Early Angiosperms
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
July 1, 2003;
20(7):
1087 - 1097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Halliday and G. C. Whitelam
Changes in Photoperiod or Temperature Alter the Functional Relationships between Phytochromes and Reveal Roles for phyD and phyE
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2003;
131(4):
1913 - 1920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Franklin, U. Praekelt, W. M. Stoddart, O. E. Billingham, K. J. Halliday, and G. C. Whitelam
Phytochromes B, D, and E Act Redundantly to Control Multiple Physiological Responses in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2003;
131(3):
1340 - 1346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Z. Kiss, J. L. Mullen, M. J. Correll, and R. P. Hangarter
Phytochromes A and B Mediate Red-Light-Induced Positive Phototropism in Roots
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2003;
131(3):
1411 - 1417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Sharrock and T. Clack
Patterns of Expression and Normalized Levels of the Five Arabidopsis Phytochromes
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2002;
130(1):
442 - 456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|