|
Plant Physiol, January 2002, Vol. 128, pp. 30-37
Functional Analysis of Tomato Pti4 in
Arabidopsis1,2
Keqiang
Wu,
Lining
Tian,
Jamie
Hollingworth,
Daniel C.W.
Brown, and
Brian
Miki*
Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West
Virginia 26506-6057 (K.W.); Southern Crop Protection and Food Research
Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, Ontario, Canada N5V
4T3 (L.T., D.C.W.B.); and Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre,
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
(J.H., B.M.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Pti4 is a tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)
transcription factor that belongs to the ERF (ethylene-responsive
element binding factor) family of proteins. It interacts with the Pto
kinase in tomato, which confers resistance to the Pseudomonas
syringae pv tomato pathogen that causes
bacterial speck disease. To study the function of Pti4, transgenic
Arabidopsis plants were generated that expressed tomato
Pti4 driven by the strong constitutive promoters, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and tCUP.
Global gene expression analysis by Affimetric GeneChip indicated that
expression of Pti4 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants
induced the expression of GCC box-containing PR genes. We also
demonstrated that Pti4 enhanced GCC box-mediated transcription of a
reporter gene. The data suggests that tomato Pti4 could act as a
transcriptional activator to regulate expression of GCC box-containing
genes. Furthermore, we show that the expression of tomato
Pti4 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants produced a
phenotype similar to that seen in plants treated with ethylene, thus
providing evidence that the Pti4 gene is involved in the
regulation of a subset of ethylene-responsive genes containing the GCC box.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ERF (ethylene-responsive element
binding factor) proteins (formerly known as EREBPs
[ethylene-responsive element binding proteins]) were first isolated
as GCC box binding proteins from tobacco (Nicotiana
tabacum; Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1995 ). The GCC box contains a
conserved AGCCGCC sequence, which was first indentified from the
promoters of ethylene-inducible genes in tobacco (Ohme-Takagi and
Shinshi, 1990 ). ERF proteins contain a highly conserved DNA binding
domain (ERF domain) consisting of 58 or 59 amino acids (Ohme-Takagi and
Shinshi, 1995 ; Hao et al., 1998 ). Although the ERF domain shares some
sequence homology with the AP2 domain found in the Arabidopsis protein
APETALA2 (Jofuku et al., 1994 ; Riechmann and Meyerowitz, 1998 ), the ERF and AP2 domain proteins belong to distinct families (Fujimoto et al.,
2000 ).
A number of ERF proteins have been identified from different plant
species (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1995 ; Buttner and Singh, 1997 ;
Stockinger et al., 1997 ; Zhou et al., 1997 ; Liu et al., 1998 ; Solano et
al., 1998 ; Menke et al., 1999 ; Fujimoto et al., 2000 ; Ohta et al.,
2000 ). For example, CBF1, DREBP1A, and DREB2A have been shown to bind
to a C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element that is involved in
drought and cold stress (Stockinger et al., 1997 ; Liu et al., 1998 ).
The ERFs, Pti4/5/6, AtERP, Arabidopsis ERF1, AtERFs, and ORCA2 bind to
the GCC box in the ethylene-responsive element that is essential for
the responsiveness of some promoters to ethylene (Ohme-Takagi and
Shinshi, 1995 ; Buttner and Singh, 1997 ; Zhou et al., 1997 ; Solano et
al., 1998 ; Menke et al., 1999 ; Fujimoto et al., 2000 ; Gu et al., 2000 ;
Ohta et al., 2000 ). In addition, a tobacco ERF protein, Tsi1, that
could bind both the GCC and the C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element
sequences was also identified (Park et al., 2001 ).
Studies on the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) resistance
(R) gene, Pto, provided evidence that linked the ERF genes to the defense response. Pto is a protein kinase that confers resistance to
Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato, a bacteria that
expresses the avirulence gene avrPto. Pto was shown to
directly interact in two-hybrid assays with the tomato ERF proteins,
Pti4/5/6 (Zhou et al., 1997 ). Pti4/5/6 proteins have been shown to bind
the GCC box cis-element, which is present in the promoter region of
many ethylene-regulated pathogenesis-related (PR) genes (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1995 ; Zhou et al., 1997 ; Gu et al., 2000 ). It has been
proposed that the Pti4/5/6 proteins may activate PR gene expression by
binding to the GCC box of the PR gene promoters (Zhou et al., 1997 ; Gu
et al., 2000 ). Ethylene has been implicated in the regulation of
basic-type PR genes during the defense responses of plants attacked by
pathogens. Infection by a pathogen and treatment with an elicitor both
promote the synthesis of ethylene and ethylene activates the
transcription of basic-type PR genes (Ecker, 1995 ; Yamamoto et al.,
1999 ). The differential expression of Pti4, Pti5, and Pti6 in various tomato tissues implies that they may
have distinct roles in plants (Thara et al., 1999 ; Gu et al., 2000 ). Pti4 is particularly interesting because its expression is
induced by ethylene and salicylic acid, and its product is
phosphorylated by the Pto kinase (Gu et al., 2000 ).
We have generated transgenic Arabidopsis plants transformed with binary
vectors carrying fusions of the tCUP or cauliflower mosaic
virus (CaMV) 35S promoter to the tomato Pti4
cDNA. Overexpression of Pti4 in Arabidopsis induces the
expression of the GCC box-containing PR genes. Etiolated
Pti4 transgenic seedlings show inhibition of hypocotyl
elongation, which is a typical characteristic of plants treated with
ethylene (Ecker, 1995 ). In addition, Pti4 transgenic plants
also display a dwarf phenotype similar to that of constitutive
ethylene-responsive mutants. Our study provides direct evidence that
the Pti4 gene product is involved in the regulation of the
ethylene-responsive genes containing the GCC box.
 |
RESULTS |
Pti4 Protein Activates GCC Box-Mediated Transcription of a
Reporter Gene
To test whether the tomato Pti4 protein can interact with
the GCC box, Pti4 effector plasmids were constructed in
which the Pti4 cDNA was driven by a strong constitutive
promoter, CaMV 35S or tCUP (Fig. 1A). The
reporter plasmids, GCC::GUS and
mGCC::GUS, were constructed using a
-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. Two GCC boxes or mutated GCC
boxes (mGCC; Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1995 ) were fused to a minimal
promoter, -62tCUP (Wu et al., 2001 ) to drive the GUS
reporter gene expression. The effector plasmids were cobombarded into
tobacco leaves together with a reporter plasmid. As shown in Figure 1B,
cotransfection of the reporter plasmid GCC::GUS
with a effector plasmid resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in GUS
expression, indicating that Pti4 protein can interact with the GCC
boxes in the promoter of the reporter construct to activate
transcription. Transcription of the reporter gene that had a mutated
GCC box was not activated by Pti4 (data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Activation of the GCC box-mediated transcription
of GUS reporter gene by Pti4 protein in transient expression assays. A,
Schematic diagram of the effector and reporter constructs used in
cobombardment experiments. The effector constructs contain the
Pti4 cDNA fused to the Nos terminator driven by
the 35S or tCUP promoter. The reporter construct
contains two GCC boxes fused to the -62tCUP minimal
promoter-GUS construct. B, Activation of the
GCC::GUS fusion gene by Pti4. The reporter plasmid
GCC::GUS was cobombarded with each effector
plasmid or the control plasmid pUC19. GUS activity was
reported as picomoles of 4-methylumbelliferone per milligram of
protein per minute. Bars indicate the SE of three
replicates.
|
|
Ectopic Expression of Tomato Pti4 Induces Resident Basic Chitinase
Gene Expression
Transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated that expressed
Pti4 driven by a strong constitutive promoter, CaMV
35S or tCUP (Foster et al., 1999 ). Southern-blot
analysis was performed to determine whether the genomic DNA of the
putative transformants contained the transgenic DNA (data not shown).
Four of the transgenic lines (tCUP::Pti4-1,
tCUP::Pti4-3 and tCUP::Pti4-4, and
tCUP::Pti4-5) contained the Pti4
transgene driven by tCUP promoter and two transgenic lines
(35S::Pti4-3 and 35S::Pti4-6)
contained Pti4 transgene driven by CaMV 35S promoter.
The expression of Pti4 RNA in the transgenic lines was
determined by northern analysis. The predicted 1-kb transcript
was detected in five transgenic lines,
tCUP::Pti4-1, tCUP::Pti4-3, tCUP::Pti4-4, 35S::Pti4-3 and
35S::Pti4-6, using the Pti4 cDNA probe.
It was absent from the wild-type plants as expected (Fig. 2). One transgenic line,
tCUP::Pti4-5, showed bands that were larger in
size than the bands in the other lanes of the transgenic plants. This
is most likely due to the downstream termination of transcription.
Different levels of Pti4 transcript accumulation were
detected in the transgenic lines, with the transgenic line tCUP::Pti4-1 having the lowest level of
Pti4 expression.

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Northern-blot analysis of the
Pti4 transgenic plants. Total RNA was isolated from
wild-type (WT) and transgenic lines (1-6). Lanes 1 to 6 correspond to
transgenic lines tCUP::Pti4-1,
tCUP::Pti4-3, tCUP::Pti4-4,
tCUP::Pti4-5, 35S::Pti4-3,
and 35S::Pti4-6, respectively. Five micrograms of
total RNA was probed with a Pti4 cDNA, a basic chitinase
(BC), and an rDNA probe, respectively.
|
|
Solano et al. (1998) reported that overexpression of another ERF
protein, ERF1, in transgenic Arabidopsis plants induced basic chitinase
gene expression. Basic chitinase is an ethylene-responsive gene, which
contains the GCC box in its promoter (Samac et al., 1990 ). We therefore
examined whether the expression of tomato Pti4 in
Arabidopsis could induce the expression of the Arabidopsis basic
chitinase gene. As shown in the Figure 2, the basic chitinase gene was
expressed at a relative low level in the wild-type but was induced in
the transgenic lines tCUP::Pti4-3,
tCUP::Pti4-5, 35S::Pti4-3,
and 35S::Pti4-6. The transgenic line
tCUP::Pti4-1, which had the lowest level of
Pti4 expression among the six transgenic lines, did not show
the induction of chitinase expression. These data indicated that there
was a general correlation between Pti4 expression and
chitinase RNA accumulation, suggesting that Pti4 induced the
expression of the basic chitinase gene in Arabidopsis. The expression
of other GCC box-containing genes, PDF1.2, PR-1, and HOOKLESS1, however, was not induced by expression of
Pti4 in transgenic plants (data not shown), suggesting that
the expression of these genes and basic chitinase gene was regulated by
different mechanisms.
Pti4 Induces Expression of the GCC Box-Containing Genes
To identify other genes regulated by Pti4, we compared global gene
expression in tCUP::Pti4-3 and wild-type seedlings
by cDNA hybridization to GeneChip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA)
containing 8,247 Arabidopsis genes. Of the 8,247 Arabidopsis genes,
only 28 genes that exhibited greater than 2.5-fold expression in
tCUP::Pti4-3 compared with the wild-type (Table
I). In comparison, the expression of the
control genes such as actin, GAPDH, and
UBQ4 did not show significant difference. Search for
cis-elements in promoter regions of these 28 induced genes revealed
that 18 of them contain GCC box related sequences in 5' upstream
sequences. Some of them encode well-known pathogen-related proteins.
These include chitinase and -1,3-glucanase that have
antifungal activities; xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase and
-glucosidase and monooxygenase 1 involve in cell wall modification;
and peroxidases, basic blue protein, and protein disulfide isomerase
involve in oxidative burst.
Pti4 Transgenic Plants Display an Ethylene-Responsive
Phenotype
To evaluate the involvement of Pti4 in the ethylene signaling
pathway, Pti4 transgenic plant lines were examined for the
ethylene-responsive phenotype. This is characterized by a triple
response in Arabidopsis, which includes inhibition of root and
hypocotyl elongation, radial swelling of the hypocotyl and root, and
exaggeration in the curvature of the apical hook (Ecker, 1995 ; Chang
and Shockey, 1999 ). The hypocotyls of the etiolated transgenic
seedlings were measured 72 h after germination. As shown in
Figures 3 and 4, the transgenic lines
showed inhibition of hypocotyl
elongation, a phenotype similar to those observed in the constitutive
ethylene response-mutants or in wild-type plants exposed ethylene
(Solano et al., 1998 ). The seedlings from the transgenic line
tCUP::Pti4-3, which had a high Pti4
expression, displayed strong inhibition of hypocotyl elongation. The
seedlings from the transgenic line tCUP::Pti4-1, which had a lower level of Pti4 transgene expression, showed
weak inhibition of hypocotyl elongation (Fig. 3). These data indicated that there was a correlation between the Pti4 expression and
the inhibition of hyopcotyl elongation.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Length of hypocotyl of transgenic
Arabidopsis seedlings. Surface-sterilized seeds from wild-type (WT) and
transgenic lines were planted in growth medium and cold treated at
4°C for 4 d before germination and growth in the dark at 23°C
for 72 h in the presence (with ACC) or absence (without ACC) of
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. The lengths of seedling
hypocotyls were measured to the closest millimeter. Fourteen to 20 seedlings from each line were measured. Error bars correspond to the
SE.
|
|

View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Phenotype of Pti4 overexpression in
transgenic seedlings. Each panel is composed of two etiolated
Arabidopsis seedling. Surface-sterilized seeds were planted in growth
medium and cold treated at 4°C for 4 d before germination and
growth in the dark at 23°C for 72 h. A, Wild type incubated
without aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (ACC); B, wild type
displaying the triple response in the presence of 10 µM ACC; C, tCUP::Pti4-3
transgenic seedlings incubated without ACC; and D,
tCUP::Pti4-3 transgenic seedlings incubated in the
presence of 10 µM ACC.
|
|
The seedlings from the transgenic lines did not show strong curvature
of the apical hook (Fig. 4), suggesting a partial seedling triple
response phenotype. This is consistent with the observation that the
HOOKLESS1 gene, a gene required for apical hook curvature (Lehman et al., 1996 ), was not expressed in the transgenic plants (data
not shown). The adult plants from the transgenic lines also displayed
reduced leaf size when compared with the wild-type plants (Fig.
5). This is a phenotype similar to that
of the constitutive ethylene-responsive mutants such as ctr1
(Ecker, 1995 ).

View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Phenotype of Pti4 overexpression in
transgenic plants. The transgenic tCUP::Pti4-3
plants (middle and right) displayed a reduced leaf size when compared
with the wild-type plant (left). The photo was taken after plants were
grown for 5 weeks in a growth chamber (16 h of light and 8 h of
darkness at 23°C).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Pti4 protein belongs to the ERF-type proteins, which is a
large family of plant transcription factors (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi,
1995 ; Riechmann and Meyerowitz, 1998 ; Fujimoto et al., 2000 ). The
binding of some ERF proteins to the GCC box in the ethylene-responsive
element suggests a role for these proteins in the regulation of
ethylene-responsive gene expression. In tomato, Pti4 transcripts
rapidly accumulated in response to ethylene, before expression of the
GCC box-containing GluB and Osm genes (Thara et
al., 1999 ; Gu et al., 2000 ), further supporting a role in
ethylene-regulated PR gene expression. Using a transient expression system, we have shown that Pti4 can function as a transcriptional activator of a GCC box-containing reporter gene. Furthermore, expression of Pti4 in Arabidopsis induced the expression of
GCC box-containing genes and conferred a constitutive
ethylene-responsive phenotype. These data suggested that
Pti4 is involved in the regulation of ethylene-responsive
genes containing the GCC box.
The GCC box contains a conserved AGCCGCC sequence, which was first
identified from the promoters of ethylene-inducible PR genes in tobacco
(Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1990 ; Eyal et al., 1993 ; Hart et al., 1993 ).
It has been suggested that this sequence is a target in the ethylene
signal transduction pathway because deletion of the GCC box eliminates
ethylene responsiveness (Broglie et al., 1989 ; Meller et al., 1993 ;
Vogeli-Lange et al., 1994 ; Shinshi et al., 1995 ). A search for plant
promoter sequences containing the GCC box sequence uncovered a number
of predominantly basic PR genes from bean (Phaesoleus
vulgarus), tobacco, potato (Solanum tuberosum),
Arabidopsis, Brassica sp., and tomato (Zhou et al., 1997 ;
Jia and Martin, 1999 ), suggesting that these PR genes might be
regulated by related ERF transcriptional factors. In Arabidopsis, the
GCC box-containing genes include basic chitinase gene,
PDF1.2, PR-1, and HOOKLESS1 (Samac et
al., 1990 ; Lehman et al., 1996 ; Lebel et al., 1998 ; Manners et al.,
1998 ). Overexpression of Pti4 in Arabidopsis induces the
expression of the basic chitinase gene and other GCC box-containing
genes. The expression of PDF1.2, PR-1, and
HOOKLESS1, however, was not induced, suggesting that the
expression of these genes might be regulated by different ERF proteins.
The Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive factor 1 (ERF1) was induced rapidly
by ethylene, and its role in regulating ethylene-inducible genes was
demonstrated (Solano et al., 1998 ). The Arabidopsis ERF1 activates GCC
box-containing PR genes such as the basic chitinase gene and
PDF1.2 and confers constitutive ethylene response when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Pti4 could be a tomato functional homolog
of ERF1 in mediating ethylene-regulated expression of PR genes
containing a GCC box. In Arabidopsis, expression of ERF1 is
controlled by a novel DNA-binding protein encoded by the
EIN3 gene, indicating that ERF1 acts downstream
of EIN3 in ethylene signaling (Solano et al., 1998 ). It
remains to be determined whether Pti4 gene expression is
regulated by a transcriptional factor similar to EIN3 in tomato.
In tobacco, at least four different ERF proteins, ERF1 through -4, have
been identified (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi, 1995 ). ERF2 and ERF4 enhance
the GCC box-mediated transcription of a reporter gene in tobacco
protoplasts, suggesting that they act as transcriptional activators
(Ohta et al., 2000 ). In contrast to ERF2 and ERF 4, ERF3 reduces the
transcription of the reporter gene in tobacco protoplasts, indicating
that ERF3 functions as a repressor. Several Arabidopsis ERF-like genes,
AtERF1 to -5, were also isolated from an
Arabidopsis cDNA library by using tobacco ERFs as probes
(Fujimoto et al., 2000 ). It has been shown that AtERF1, AtERF2, and
AtERF5 act as transcriptional activators for GCC box-dependent
transcription. AtERF3 and AtERF4, however, act as transcriptional
repressors (Fujimoto et al., 2000 ). These studies indicate that GCC
box-dependent transcription is controlled by a dynamic system utilizing
antagonistic mechanisms in plants. Different ERF proteins also possess
distinct DNA binding preferences, suggesting they could play different roles in the differential control of GCC box-containing gene expression (Hao et al., 1998 ; Fujimoto et al., 2000 ).
In tomato, three ERF-like genes, Pti4/5/6, were
identified by their interaction with Pto kinase in yeast two-hybrid
screening (Zhou et al., 1997 ). Pti4/5/6 show differential
expression patterns in various tomato tissues, implying that they may
play distinct roles (Thara et al., 1999 ; Gu et al., 2000 ). Our study
demonstrates that expression of the Pti4 gene in Arabidopsis
induces the expression of GCC box-containing genes. In tomato,
several GCC box-containing genes, such as GluB,
Osm, and one 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase
gene, have been identified (Jia and Martin, 1999 ). Pti4 transcripts
rapidly accumulated in response to ethylene, before expression of the
GCC box-containing GluB and Osm genes (Thara et
al., 1999 ; Gu et al., 2000 ), suggesting that Pti4 may control the
expression of a subset of GCC box-containing genes in tomato. In
Arabidopsis, an ERF-like protein, AtEBP, was shown to interact with a
basic Leu zipper transcription factor (Buttner and Singh, 1997 ),
indicating that ERF proteins may interact with other transcriptional
factors to regulate gene expression. Further research is required to
investigate how subsets of GCC box-containing genes are regulated by
different EFR proteins.
In summary, we have demonstrated that Pti4 can act as a transcriptional
activator to enhance GCC box-mediated gene transcription. Expression of
Pti4 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants confers a constitutive
ethylene phenotype and induces the GCC box-containing gene expression.
Our study provides evidence that Pti4 gene product is
involved in the regulation of a subset of ethylene-responsive genes
containing the GCC box.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material
Arabidopsis (ecotype Columbia) was grown in a growth chamber (16 h of light and 8 h of darkness at 23°C) after a 2- to 4-d vernalization period. For growth under sterile conditions, seeds were
surface sterilized (15-min incubation in 5% [v/v] sodium hypochlorite, and a three-time rinse in sterile distilled water) and
sown on one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog salts (Sigma, St. Louis;
Murashige and Skoog, 1962 ) supplemented with 1% (w/v) Suc,
pH 5.7, and 0.8% (w/v) agar in petri dishes.
To test the triple response of seedlings, surface-sterilized seeds were
planted in Murashige and Skoog growth medium and cold treated at 4°C
for 4 d. Seeds were then grown in the dark at 23°C for 72 h
in the presence or absence of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid,
and the hypocotyl lengths of seedlings were measured.
Southern- and Northern-Blot Analysis
Total genomic DNA from Arabidopsis was extracted as described
(Dellaporta et al., 1983 ). For Southern blots, Arabidopsis genomic DNA
was digested with restriction enzymes, separated by agarose gel
electrophoresis, and transferred to nylon membranes (Sambrook et al.,
1989 ). For northern analysis, total RNA was isolated from 100 to 200 mg
of Arabidopsis tissues using TriPure Reagent as described by the
manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim, Basel). Northern blots were prepared
by electrophoresis of 5- to 10-µg samples of total RNA through
agarose gels in the presence of formaldehyde (Strommer et al., 1993 ),
followed by transfer to nylon membranes. Southern and northern blots
were probed with 32P-labeled probes. Prehybridization and
hybridization were performed at 65°C in 0.5 M
Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2), 7% (w/v) SDS, and 1 mM EDTA. Filters were washed once for 15 min in 2× SSC
with 0.1% (w/v) SDS at room temperature, then twice for 20 min
in 0.1× SSC, 0.1% (w/v) SDS at 65°C. The damp filters were
autoradiographed at 80°C using two intensifying screens. Filters
were stripped in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM
EDTA, and 0.05% (w/v) SDS at 100°C for 2 min when reprobing
was required.
Synthesis of Biotin-Labeled cRNA
The methods for preparation of cRNA directly from total RNA and
subsequent steps leading to hybridization and scanning of the U95
GeneChip Arrays were provided by the manufacturer (Affymetrix). Briefly, first-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 20 µg of total RNA
with a special oligo(dT)24 primer containing a T7 RNA polymerase promoter at its 5' end in 20 µL of first-strand reaction mix at 42°C for 1 h. The second-strand was synthesized in second-strand reaction mix for 2 h at 16°C. After second-strand synthesis,
biotin-labeled cRNA was generated from the cDNA sample by an in vitro
transcription reaction using BioArray RNA Transcript Labeling Kit (Enzo
Diagnostics, New York) with biotin-labeled CTP and UTP. The labeled
cRNA was purified by using RNeasy spin columns (Qiagen USA, Valencia,
CA). Fifteen micrograms of each cRNA sample was fragmented at 94°C for 35 min in fragmentation buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, pH
8.1, 100 mM potassium acetate, and 30 mM
magnesium acetate) and then used to prepare 300 µL of mixture. A
biotinylated oligonucleotide, B2, was added that hybridizes to unique
features at the center and four corners of each chip to map the probe
sets on the chip.
Oligonucleotide Array Hybridization and Scanning
cRNA hybridization mix was heated to 94°C for 5 min,
equilibrated to 45°C for 5 min, and clarified by centrifugation
(14,000g) at room temperature for 6 min. Aliquots of
each sample (10 mg of cRNA in 200 mL of the mixture) were hybridized
GeneChip arrays at 45°C for 16 h in a rotisserie oven set at 60 rpm (GeneChip Hybridization Oven 640, Affymetrix). After this, the
arrays were washed with SSPE, stained with streptavidin-phycoerythrin
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and washed again. The whole procedure of
washing and staining was carried out in GeneChip Fluidics Station 400 (Affymetrix). Then the chip was scanned by GeneArray Scanner (HP and
Affymetrix). Average difference and expression call for each features
on the chip was computed using Affymetrix GeneChip Analysis Suite
version with a default parameters.
Plasmid Construction
To prepare reporter constructs, the CaMV 35S
promoter of pBI221 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) was
replaced with a truncated tCUP promoter,
-394tCUP (Wu et al., 2001 ), to generate the
pBI-BtCUP vector. The -394tCUP promoter
of pBI-BtCUP was replaced with a minimal
tCUP promoter, -62tCUP. DNA fragments
containing two GCC boxes or mutated GCC boxes (Ohme-Takagi and Shinshi,
1995 ) were ligated into the PstI site located upstream
of the -62tCUP promoter.
To construct the effector plasmids, we replaced the 35S
promoter of pBI221 with the tCUP promoter
(Foster et al., 1999 ) to generate the pBI-tCUP vector.
The GUS gene in the pBI221 and
pBI-tCUP was replaced with the Pti4
coding region to generate 35S::Pti4 and
tCUP::Pti4, respectively.
To generate plasmid for Arabidopsis transformation, the
35S::Pti4 and
tCUP::Pti4 plasmids were digested with
EcoRI and HindIII, and the resulting
fragment containing the promoters and the Pti4 gene were
then subcloned into the multicloning sites of
pCAMBIA2300 binary vector (Cambia, Canberra, Australia).
Plant Transformation and Selection
Plant transformation plasmids were electroporated into
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 as described by Shaw
(1995) . The A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation of
Arabidopsis was performed as described (Clough and Bent, 1998 ), with
the following modifications. Plants with immature floral buds and few
siliques were dipped into a solution containing A.
tumefaciens, 2.3 g L 1 Murashige and Skoog
salts (Sigma), 5% (w/v) Suc, and 0.03% (w/v) Silwet L-77
(Lehle Seeds, Round Rock, TX) for 0.5 min. T1 seeds were collected,
dried at 25°C, and sown on sterile media containing 40 µg
mL 1 kanamycin to select the transformants. Surviving T1
plantlets were transferred to soil to set seeds (T2).
Particle Gun Delivery Assays
Tobacco (SR1; Nicotiana tabacum) plants were
maintained in vitro in one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium
(Murashige and Skoog, 1962 ) in Magenta containers (Magenta Corp.,
Chicago) in a growth chamber at 25°C. After transfer to fresh medium
for 2 to 3 weeks, uniform-sized leaves (about 3 cm in width) were cut
off from the plants and placed on a medium consisting of Murashige and
Skoog salts, B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al., 1968 ), 1 mg L 1
6-benzyladenine, 0.1 mg L 1 naphthalene acetic acid,
3% (w/v) Suc, and 0.25% (w/v) Gelrite in a 20- × 15-mm petri
dish. The leaves were preconditioned on this medium for 1 d before
gene delivery.
Plasmid DNA was isolated using the Qiagen Plasmid Midi Kit. The
reporter plasmid was mixed with an effector plasmid at a 1:5 ratio
(w/v). In the control, the reporter was mixed with the pUC19 plasmid. A
modified particle inflow gun (Brown et al., 1994 ) was used for DNA
delivery. DNA was precipitated onto tungsten particles using following
protocol: 5 µg of DNA was added to 25 µL of tungsten particles (100 mg mL 1) and followed by the addition of 25 µL of 2.5 M CaCl2 and 5 µL of 0.1 M
spermidine. The leaves were bombarded at a distance 16 cm from the
screen and under a pressure of 1,000 kPa of He gas. Bombarded leaves
were maintained on the same medium for 24 h before assay for GUS
activity. Gene expression was determined by histochemical and
fluorometric assays (Jefferson, 1988 ). GUS activity was reported as
picomoles of 4-methylumbelliferone per milligram of protein per minute.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Gregory Martin (Cornell
University) for providing us with the Pti4 cDNA
clone. We thank Ming Hu, Teresa Martin, Marysia Latoszek-Green, and
Susan Sibbold for technical assistance, Dr. Tim Xing and Linda Harris
for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received August 6, 2001; accepted October 13, 2001.
1
This work was supported in part by the Matching
Investment Initiative Program at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. This
paper is Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre contribution
no. 001554.
2
©Minister of Public Works and Government Services
Canada 2002. For the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food,
Government of Canada.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail mikib{at}em.agr.ca; fax
613-759- 1701.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010696.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Broglie KE, Biddle P, Cressman R, Broglie R
(1989)
Functional analysis of DNA sequences responsible for ethylene regulation of a bean chitinase gene in transgenic tobacco.
Plant Cell
1: 599-607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brown DCW, Tian L-N, Buckley DJ, Lefebvre M, McGrath A, Webb J
(1994)
Development of a simple particle bombardment device for gene delivery into plant cells.
Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult
37: 47-53
-
Buttner M, Singh KB
(1997)
Arabidopsis thaliana ethylene-responsive element binding protein (AtEBP), an ethylene-inducible, GCC box DNA-binding protein interacts with an ocs element binding protein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94: 5961-5966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chang C, Shockey JA
(1999)
The ethylene-response pathway: signal perception to gene regulation.
Curr Opin Plant Biol
2: 352-358[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Clough SJ, Bent AF
(1998)
Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
16: 735-743[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB
(1983)
A plant DNA minipreparation, version II.
Plant Mol Rep
1: 19-21
-
Ecker JR
(1995)
The ethylene signal transduction pathway in plants.
Science
268: 667-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eyal Y, Meller Y, Lev-Yadun S, Fluhr R
(1993)
A basic-type PR-1 promoter directs ethylene responsiveness, vascular and abscission zone-specific expression.
Plant J
4: 225-234[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Foster E, Hattori J, Labbe H, Ouellet T, Fobert P, James L, Miki B
(1999)
A tobacco cryptic constitutive promoter, tCUP, revealed by T-DNA tagging.
Plant Mol Biol
41: 45-55[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Fujimoto SY, Ohta M, Usui A, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M
(2000)
Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive element binding factors act as transcriptional activators or repressors of GCC box-mediated gene expression.
Plant Cell
12: 393-404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K
(1968)
Nutrient requirement suspension cultures of soybean root cells.
Exp Cell Res
50: 151-158[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Gu Y, Yang C, Thara YK, Zhou J, Martin GB
(2000)
Pti4 is induced by ethylene and salicylic acid, and its product is phosphorylated by the Pto kinase.
Plant Cell
12: 771-786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hao D, Ohme-Takagi M, Sarai A
(1998)
Unique mode of GCC box recognition by the DNA-binding domain of ethylene-responsive element-binding factor (ERF domain) in plant.
J Biol Chem
273: 26857-26861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hart CM, Nagy F, Meins F Jr
(1993)
A 61 bp enhancer element of the tobacco beta-1,3-glucanase B gene interacts with one or more regulated nuclear proteins.
Plant Mol Biol
21: 121-131[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Jefferson R
(1988)
Plant reporter genes: the GUS gene fusion system.
In
JK Setlow, A Hollaender, eds, Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods Plenum Press, New York, pp 247-263
-
Jia Y, Martin GB
(1999)
Rapid transcript accumulation of pathogenesis-related genes during an incompatible interaction in bacterial speck disease-resistant tomato plants.
Plant Mol Biol
40: 455-465[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Jofuku KD, den Boer BG, Van Montagu M, Okamuro JK
(1994)
Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene APETALA2.
Plant Cell
6: 1211-1225[Abstract]
-
Lebel E, Heifetz P, Thorne L, Uknes S, Ryals J, Ward E
(1998)
Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controlling PR-1 gene expression in Arabidopsis.
Plant J
16: 223-233[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Lehman A, Black R, Ecker JR
(1996)
HOOKLESS1, an ethylene response gene, is required for differential cell elongation in the Arabidopsis hypocotyl.
Cell
85: 183-194[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y, Abe H, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K
(1998)
Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
10: 1391-1406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Manners JM, Penninckx IA, Vermaere K, Kazan K, Brown RL, Morgan A, Maclean DJ, Curtis MD, Cammue BP, Broekaert WF
(1998)
The promoter of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2 from Arabidopsis is systemically activated by fungal pathogens and responds to methyl jasmonate but not to salicylic acid.
Plant Mol Biol
38: 1071-1080[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Meller Y, Sessa G, Eyal Y, Fluhr R
(1993)
DNA-protein interactions on a cis-DNA element essential for ethylene regulation.
Plant Mol Biol
23: 453-463[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Menke FLH, Champion A, Kijne JW, Memelink J
(1999)
A novel jasmonate- and elicitor-responsive element in the periwinkle secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene Str interacts with a jasmonate- and elicitor-inducible AP2-domain transcription factor, ORCA2.
EMBO J
18: 4455-4463[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Murashige T, Skoog F
(1962)
A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures.
Physiol Plant
15: 473-497[CrossRef]
-
Ohme-Takagi M, Shinshi H
(1990)
Structure and expression of a tobacco beta-1,3-glucanase gene.
Plant Mol Biol
15: 941-946[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Ohme-Takagi M, Shinshi H
(1995)
Ethylene-inducible DNA binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element.
Plant Cell
7: 173-182[Abstract]
-
Ohta M, Ohme-Takagi M, Shinshi H
(2000)
Three ethylene-responsive transcriptional factors in tobacco with distinct transactivation functions.
Plant J
22: 29-38[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Park JM, Park C, Lee S, Ham B, Shin R, Pack K
(2001)
Overexpression of the tobacco Isi1 gene encoding an EREBP/AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco.
Plant Cell
13: 1035-1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM
(1998)
The AP2/EREBP family of plant transcription factors.
Biol Chem
379: 633-646[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Samac DA, Hironaka CM, Yallaly PE, Shah DM
(1990)
Isolation and characterization of the genes encoding basic and acidic chitinase in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Physiol
93: 907-914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Shaw CH
(1995)
Introduction of cloning plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
Methods Mol Biol
49: 33-37[Medline]
-
Shinshi H, Usami S, Ohme-Takagi M
(1995)
Identification of an ethylene-responsive region in the promoter of a tobacco class I chitinase gene.
Plant Mol Biol
27: 923-932[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Solano R, Stepanova A, Chao Q, Ecker JR
(1998)
Nuclear events in ethylene signaling: a transcriptional cascade mediated by ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and ETHYLENE-RESPONSE-FACTOR1.
Genes Dev
12: 3703-3714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stockinger EJ, Gilmour SJ, Thomashow MF
(1997)
Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94: 1035-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Strommer J, Gregerson R, Vayda M
(1993)
Isolation and characterization of plant mRNA.
In
BR Glik, JE Thompson, eds, Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 49-66
-
Thara VK, Tang X, Gu YQ, Martin GB, Zhou JM
(1999)
Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato induces the expression of tomato EREBP-like genes Pti4 and Pti5 independent of ethylene, salicylate and jasmonate.
Plant J
20: 475-483[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Vogeli-Lange R, Frundt C, Hart CM, Nagy F, Meins F Jr
(1994)
Developmental, hormonal, and pathogenesis-related regulation of the tobacco class I beta-1,3-glucanase B promoter.
Plant Mol Biol
25: 299-311[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Yamamoto S, Suzuki K, Shinshi H
(1999)
Elicitor-responsive, ethylene-independent activation of GCC box-mediated transcription that is regulated by both protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in cultured tobacco cells.
Plant J
20: 571-579[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Wu K, Malik K, Tian L, Hu M, Martin T, Foster L, Brown D, Miki B
(2001)
Enhancers and core promoter elements are essential for the activity of a cryptic gene activation sequence from tobacco, tCUP.
Mol Genet Genom
265: 763-770[Medline]
-
Zhou J, Tang X, Martin GB
(1997)
The Pto kinase conferring resistance to tomato bacterial speck disease interacts with proteins that bind a cis-element of pathogenesis-related genes.
EMBO J
16: 3207-3218[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, R. Quan, X.-C. Wang, and R. Huang
Transcriptional Regulation of the Ethylene Response Factor LeERF2 in the Expression of Ethylene Biosynthesis Genes Controls Ethylene Production in Tomato and Tobacco
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2009;
150(1):
365 - 377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Li, X. Su, B. Zhang, Q. Huang, X. Zhang, and R. Huang
Expression of jasmonic ethylene responsive factor gene in transgenic poplar tree leads to increased salt tolerance
Tree Physiol,
February 1, 2009;
29(2):
273 - 279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gonzalez-Lamothe, P. Boyle, A. Dulude, V. Roy, C. Lezin-Doumbou, G. S. Kaur, K. Bouarab, C. Despres, and N. Brisson
The Transcriptional Activator Pti4 Is Required for the Recruitment of a Repressosome Nucleated by Repressor SEBF at the Potato PR-10a Gene
PLANT CELL,
November 1, 2008;
20(11):
3136 - 3147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Szemenyei, M. Hannon, and J. A. Long
TOPLESS Mediates Auxin-Dependent Transcriptional Repression During Arabidopsis Embryogenesis
Science,
March 7, 2008;
319(5868):
1384 - 1386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Welsch, D. Maass, T. Voegel, D. DellaPenna, and P. Beyer
Transcription Factor RAP2.2 and Its Interacting Partner SINAT2: Stable Elements in the Carotenogenesis of Arabidopsis Leaves
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2007;
145(3):
1073 - 1085.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Fukao, K. Xu, P. C. Ronald, and J. Bailey-Serres
A Variable Cluster of Ethylene Response Factor-Like Genes Regulates Metabolic and Developmental Acclimation Responses to Submergence in Rice
PLANT CELL,
August 1, 2006;
18(8):
2021 - 2034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y. Yi, J.-H. Kim, Y.-H. Joung, S. Lee, W.-T. Kim, S. H. Yu, and D. Choi
The Pepper Transcription Factor CaPF1 Confers Pathogen and Freezing Tolerance in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2004;
136(1):
2862 - 2874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Boter, O. Ruiz-Rivero, A. Abdeen, and S. Prat
Conserved MYC transcription factors play a key role in jasmonate signaling both in tomato and Arabidopsis
Genes & Dev.,
July 1, 2004;
18(13):
1577 - 1591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chakravarthy, R. P. Tuori, M. D. D'Ascenzo, P. R. Fobert, C. Despres, and G. B. Martin
The Tomato Transcription Factor Pti4 Regulates Defense-Related Gene Expression via GCC Box and Non-GCC Box cis Elements
PLANT CELL,
December 1, 2003;
15(12):
3033 - 3050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Brown, K. Kazan, K. C. McGrath, D. J. Maclean, and J. M. Manners
A Role for the GCC-Box in Jasmonate-Mediated Activation of the PDF1.2 Gene of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2003;
132(2):
1020 - 1032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|