|
|
||||||||
|
First published online February 24, 2002; 10.1104/pp.010887 Plant Physiol, March 2002, Vol. 128, pp. 1109-1119
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Glutamyl transpeptidase (
-GT) is a ubiquitous enzyme
that catalyzes the first step of glutathione (GSH) degradation in the
-glutamyl cycle in mammals. A cDNA encoding an Arabidopsis homolog
for
-GT was overexpressed in tobacco (Nicotiana
tabacum) plants. A high level of the membrane-bound
-GT
activity was localized outside the cell in transgenic plants. The
overproduced enzyme was characterized by a high affinity to GSH and was
cleaved post-translationally in two unequal subunits. Thus, Arabidopsis
-GT is similar to the mammalian enzymes in enzymatic properties,
post-translational processing, and cellular localization, suggesting
analogous biological functions as a key enzyme in the catabolism of GSH.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glutathione (GSH) is involved in a
number of important cellular functions, particularly in the storage and
transport of reduced S, protection of cells against oxidative stress,
detoxification of xenobiotics and heavy metals, redox regulation of
gene expression, and progression through the cell cycle (Meister and
Anderson, 1983
; May et al., 1998
; Noctor et al., 1998
; den Boer and
Murray, 2000
). Because GSH participates directly in the cellular
protection against oxidative stress, modification of the GSH metabolism
by changing the production of the enzymes involved in its regulation can be a useful approach to obtaining stress-tolerant plants (Noctor et
al., 1998
).
In mammals, the GSH metabolism is mediated by the so-called
-glutamyl cycle (Meister and Anderson, 1983
) that includes two ATP-dependent GSH synthesis steps, catalyzed by
-glutamyl Cys synthetase and GSH synthetase, and a specific GSH degradation pathway,
which allows the reutilization of the amino acids for further GSH
resynthesis. Because GSH is considered to be the main storage compound
of reduced S, GSH degradation is an important process to make S
available for an organism in the form of Cys (Lieberman et al.,
1996
).
The first enzyme of the GSH breakdown pathway is
-glutamyl
transpeptidase (
-GT; EC 2.3.2.2).
-GT catalyzes transfer of the
-glutamyl moiety from GSH to amino acids, peptides (including GSH
itself), or water (Meister et al., 1981
; Taniguchi and Ikeda, 1998
). In
contrast to GSH synthesis, GSH breakdown occurs on the outer surface of
the plasma membrane and includes the
-GT reaction followed by the
action of a dipeptidase:
|
|
-Glutamyl amino acids formed as a result of the
-GT action
are then transported back into cells where they become substrates for a
-glutamyl cyclotransferase, an enzyme converting them into 5-oxo-Pro
and the corresponding amino acids. Furthermore, a 5-oxo-prolinase converts 5-oxo-Pro to L-Glu acid, completing the
-glutamyl cycle:
|
|
-GT is highly active in organs with a secretory
or absorptive function. These organs are characterized by a high rate
of GSH export outside the cells (Meister and Anderson, 1983
-GT is
considered to be the main enzyme for Cys reabsorption and transport.
Knock-out mice lacking a functional
-GT lose Cys in the form of GSH
because they cannot reuse the GSH that has been exported outside the
cells. This leads to the development of glutathionemia and
glutathionuria, and animals eventually die from Cys starvation. This
phenotype can be partially rescued by Cys administration (Lieberman et
al., 1996Because GSH conjugates are also substrates for
-GT, the enzyme plays
a role both in detoxification of poisonous compounds (Meister, 1988
;
Ishikawa, 1992
) and the normal metabolism of biologically active
compounds such as leukotrienes and prostaglandins (Cagen et al., 1976
;
Anderson et al., 1982
; Meister, 1988
; Ishikawa, 1992
; Carter et al.,
1997
).
-GT is also an important enzyme that probably modulates the redox
status of thiols in the plasma membrane proteins (Del Bello et al.,
1999
; Dominici et al., 1999
), because one of the products of the
-GT
reaction, Cys-Gly, contains a highly reactive thiol capable of
producing active oxygen species by participating in the Fenton reaction
with iron ions (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1989
).
In plants, enzymes with
-GT activity are believed to be involved in
secondary metabolism and to catalyze the synthesis of a range of
-glutamyl dipeptides, which are formed during fruit ripening and
accumulate in storage tissues such as seeds or bulbs in certain plants.
Such peptides include hypoglycin B in the ackee plant (Blighia
sapida; Kean and Hare, 1980
);
-Glu linked to Asp, Phe, and Tyr
in soybean (Glycine max; Ishikawa et al., 1967
); Asp, Glu,
and Tyr in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis; Kasai et al.,
1982
); D-Ala and homo-Ser in pea (Pisum
sativum) seedlings (Kawasaki et al., 1982
); and some others. In
onion,
-GT is supposed to catalyze the last step in the formation of
volatile compound precursors by cleaving the
-glutamyl moiety off
-glutamyl alk(en) yl-Cys sulfoxides (Lancaster and Shaw,
1994
).
Whether plant
-GT participates in GSH metabolism is still an open
question. It is not clear whether GSH is a true substrate in vivo for
the plant
-GT, because, in some cases, GSH has been reported
to be a poor in vitro substrate for the plant
-GT
(Steinkamp and Rennenberg, 1984
; Lancaster and Shaw, 1994
). Moreover,
the existence of the
-glutamyl cycle in plants is not evident.
Although the GSH biosynthetic pathway is relatively well studied
(Noctor et al., 1998
), very little is known about the GSH degradation mechanism(s). Results obtained in experiments with tobacco
(Nicotiana tabacum) suspension cultures indicated that GSH
degradation is initiated by a carboxypeptidase (Steinkamp and
Rennenberg, 1985
; Rennenberg and Lamoureux, 1990
). The
-Glu-Cys
dipeptide produced as a result of this reaction is further degraded to
Glu and Cys by the consecutive actions of
-glutamylcyclotransferase
and 5-oxo-prolinase (Rennenberg and Lamoureux, 1990
). On the other
hand, Cys-Gly found in soybean (Bergmann and Rennenberg, 1993
) and
heterotrophic tobacco cultures (Schneider and Rennenberg, 1992
)
suggests that the first step in GSH degradation can be catalyzed by
-GT, followed by a dipeptidase activity.
-GT activities and the purified enzymes have been characterized from
a number of plant species (Thompson et al., 1964
; Goore and Thompson,
1967
; Kasai et al., 1982
; Kawasaki et al., 1982
; Martin and Slovin,
2000
). However, the reported molecular masses and composition, cellular
localization, and biochemical properties vary considerably.
A cDNA (D22) from Arabidopsis has been cloned that confers resistance
to oxidative stress when expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Kushnir et al., 1995
). The cDNA encoded a
protein with extensive homology to the mammalian
-GT. This finding
prompted us to overexpress the cDNA in tobacco plants to characterize
further the encoded protein and to study the possible effects of its
overproduction on the GSH metabolism.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
D22 cDNA Is Homologous to the Mammalian
-GT
Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of the protein
encoded by the D22 cDNA (Kushnir et al., 1995
) with the mammalian
-GT revealed that the putative Arabidopsis
-GT (AtGGT) is very similar to the animal enzymes (Fig. 1).
The AtGGT shares 41% identical and 48% similar amino acids with the
human (Homo sapiens)
-GT. A putative hydrophobic
membrane-anchoring domain was found at the N terminus of the plant
protein but was shorter than that of the mammalian enzyme. All amino
acid residues, which are necessary for the catalytic activity of the
mammalian
-GT, are conserved in the plant enzyme: Arg-107, Asp-422,
and Asp-423 (positions correspond to the human enzyme), which are
believed to be important for binding of the donor substrate, and
Ser-451 and Ser-452, which are of critical importance in both enzyme
catalysis and in the reaction with the specific
-GT inhibitor
acivicin (Taniguchi and Ikeda, 1998
). These data suggest that the D22
cDNA probably codes for an AtGGT that might have characteristics
similar to those of the mammalian enzyme.
|
-GT in Arabidopsis Is Encoded by a Small Gene Family
Purification of enzymes with
-GT activity from different plant
species resulted in contradictions regarding their molecular masses,
subunit composition, cellular localization, and biochemical characteristics. The availability of the nearly complete genomic sequence of Arabidopsis allowed us to assess to what extent these discrepancies might be due to either artifacts of enzyme purification procedures or natural gene diversity.
Database searches revealed that the AtGGT gene (accession no. CAB80627)
is localized on chromosome IV. The sequence of the gene is immediately
followed by that of a putative gene (accession no. CAB80628), of which
the deduced amino acid sequence of the encoded protein shares 83%
identical and 87% similar residues with AtGGT. These data are in
agreement with the previously obtained DNA gel-blot hybridization data
(Kushnir et al., 1995
) that showed the presence of at least two highly
homologous genes for AtGGT. Furthermore, one additional putative gene
(accession no. CAB79679) was found on the same chromosome with a
deduced protein sequence with 50% identical and 59% similar amino
acids to AtGGT and all of the hallmarks required for catalytic
activity. This putative protein of 69.2 kD has a long N-terminal
extension, which is predicted to contain a trans-membrane domain. A
potential gene (accession no. AAF07391) encoding a small protein of 191 amino acids (20.9 kD) was also found on chromosome I. The sequence of
the encoded protein matched the 311- to 501-amino acid
fragment of AtGGT, which contains the active site of the enzyme
(Taniguchi and Ikeda, 1998
). The putative protein shares 85% identical
and 87% similar amino acids with AtGGT in this region. Thus, in
Arabidopsis,
-GT is probably represented by at least four different
isoforms that might have different cellular localizations and serve
different functions.
Transgenic Tobacco Plants Producing AtGGT Possess High
-GT
Activity
To further characterize AtGGT, transgenic tobacco plants were transformed with the D22 cDNA under the control of the 35S promoter. Integration and expression of the transgenes were checked by DNA and RNA gel-blot hybridizations, respectively (data not shown). Transgenic lines that demonstrated highest transgene expression at the level of mRNA were selected for further analysis.
Total protein extracts from the leaves of transgenic plants have been
shown to catalyze the release of p-nitroaniline (PNA) from
-glutamyl-p-nitroanilide (GPNA), a typical reaction used to assay
-GT activity (Orlowski and Meister, 1963
; Fig.
2). No activity was detected in protein
extracts isolated from leaves of control plants transformed with the
"empty" vector under the assay conditions. This observation
suggests that the activity detected is attributed to the overproduced
protein. This result allowed us to conclude that AtGGT is a plant
-GT.
|
AtGGT Is Localized on the Plasma Membrane Outside the Cell
Because the animal
-GT is a membrane-bound protein, anchored by
its short N-terminal hydrophobic domain to the plasma membrane outside
the cell, we addressed the question of where AtGGT is localized.
Analysis of the AtGGT protein sequence with appropriate software
predicted a similar leader sequence in the N terminus and suggested
with equal likelihood that the enzyme was localized either in the
plasma or in the vacuolar membranes. To find out whether AtGGT is a
membrane-bound protein, we analyzed the solubilization of the enzymatic
activity as a function of the ionic strength of the extraction buffer,
because it had been shown previously that membrane-bound plant
-GTs
could be solubilized in a high-salt buffer (Martin and Slovin,
2000
).
No
-GT activity was detected in the soluble fraction of the leaf
tissue of transgenic plants under low-ionic-strength conditions, indicating that the overproduced enzyme was exclusively membrane bound.
The activity could only be solubilized in a high-salt solution, containing 0.5 to 1 M NaCl.
The mammalian
-GT is localized on the plasma membrane outside the
cell. To check whether this is the case for the plant enzyme, we
incubated intact mesophyll protoplasts from the transgenic and control
plants in a solution containing GPNA. Whereas no
-GT activity was
observed with protoplasts from the control plants, incubation of
protoplasts from transgenic plants resulted in the release of PNA,
suggesting that the overproduced enzyme is localized outside the cell.
However, this result still leaves open the possibility that the
substrate has been taken up by the protoplasts with further secretion
of the reaction product. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that a
fraction of the enzyme is localized in the intracellular membranes,
such as the vacuolar membrane or the endoplasmic reticulum.
To localize the AtGGT activity in a more direct way, leaf discs from
the transgenic and control plants were infiltrated with a fluorescent
-GT substrate,
-glutamyl-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin (Smith et al.,
1979
). The fluorescence was monitored in vivo using laser confocal
microscopy. As is seen in Figure 3,
intense fluorescence is associated with the plasma membrane/cell wall
of the AtGGT-overproducing plants. No membrane-associated fluorescence
was detected in control plants. Thus, the AtGGT is a plasma
membrane-bound protein and localized outside the cell.
|
AtGGT Consists of Two Unequal Subunits
The mammalian
-GT is composed of two subunits derived from the
processing by a protease of a single polypeptide chain precursor. When
high-salt protein extracts from the transgenic and control plants were
analyzed by protein gel blots with a polyclonal antibody raised against
AtGGT (see "Materials and Methods"), two bands with calculated
molecular masses of 29 and 41 kD in a 1:1 ratio were found to react
with the antibody (Fig. 4). The sum of
their calculated molecular masses, 70 kD, was roughly equal to the
expected molecular mass of AtGGT (61.1 kD). The AtGGT proteolysis did
probably not occur during the protein isolation, because the same bands were obtained in the protein gel blots of total protein extracts isolated under denaturing conditions (data not shown). From these data,
the bands can be assumed to be products of the single-chain precursor
cleavage. The discrepancy between expected and determined molecular
masses can be explained by possible glycosylation of the plant
-GT,
because animal
-GTs are known to be heavily glycosylated (Taniguchi
and Ikeda, 1998
). Two potential glycosylation sites were found in the
large subunit sequence and one in the sequence of the small subunit
(Fig. 1).
|
AtGGT Is Similar to the Mammalian Enzyme in Its Biochemical Characteristics
Given the similarity between the mammalian
-GT and AtGGT
sequences, processing, and extracellular localization, the question arises as to whether the plant enzyme also possesses similar
biochemical characteristics. The plant enzyme efficiently hydrolyzes
GPNA in a relatively wide pH range (Fig.
5), and by adding the "classical"
-glutamyl group acceptor, dipeptide Gly-Gly, the reaction is stimulated by approximately 1.5-fold (Vmax
of the hydrolysis and transpeptidation reactions, 5 and 8 µM min
1, respectively).
The transpeptidation was stimulated also to a different extent by
addition of different amino acid acceptors, each having a different pH
optimum (data not shown). The Km value of
AtGGT for GPNA as determined in the transpeptidation reaction with GPNA
as donor and Gly-Gly as acceptor was in a range similar to those of the
enzymes from other organisms (Table
I).
|
|
Because one of the supposed functions of AtGGT is connected to GSH
catabolism, it was important to determine whether AtGGT could readily
use GSH as donor substrate. Incubation of a purified bovine
-GT with
GSH as the donor and [35S]Met as the acceptor
of the
-glutamyl group led to the formation of the
35S-labeled
-Glu-Met, which was visualized by
thin-layer chromatography (Fig. 6).
Essentially the same reaction was catalyzed by the protein extract from
transgenic plants but not by that from the control plants. These data
prove unequivocally that GSH can be used in vitro by AtGGT as donor of
the
-glutamyl group.
|
The ability of AtGGT to use GSH as donor substrate in vitro raises
another important question as to whether GSH is a high-affinity substrate that can be used by the enzyme in vivo. When GSH was added to
the standard activity reaction, the release of PNA from GPNA was
inhibited competitively (Fig. 7). In such
a reaction in which one substrate inhibits the other substrate, the
inhibition constant Ki is actually equal to
the kinetic constant Km of the inhibiting
substrate (Cornish-Bowden and Wharton, 1988
). The kinetics of PNA
release at different GSH concentrations allowed us to determine the
Ki as 255 ± 4 µM. Therefore, the
Km value of AtGGT for GSH is 255 ± 4 µM, which is low enough to claim that GSH is a
good substrate for AtGGT in vitro and can potentially be the main in vivo substrate.
|
Taken together, these results confirm that AtGGT has catalytic
characteristics very similar to those of yeast, mammalian, and other
plant
-GTs and, more importantly, that it has a high in vitro
affinity to GSH, suggesting that GSH may be the functional substrate
for the plant
-GT in vivo.
Transgenic and Control Plants Have Similar GSH Degradation Rates
By assuming that GSH is a good substrate for AtGGT, does the
high
-GT activity affect GSH metabolism in transgenic plants? Quantitative determination of GSH and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) demonstrated that the steady-state levels of these compounds (800 ± 100 pM µg
1 protein with a GSH:GSSG ratio
of 9:1 [w/w]) are essentially the same in leaves of transgenic
and control plants. This observation does not exclude the possibility
that the GSH turnover rate can be different in transgenic plants,
because the higher GSH degradation rate brought about by the AtGGT
overproduction might be compensated by an increase in the rate of GSH
synthesis. To check whether this is the case, leaf discs from
transgenic and control plants were infiltrated with
L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine,
which inhibits GSH synthesis, and the time course of the GSH
degradation rate was followed (Fig. 8).
Upon inhibition of GSH synthesis with
L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine, the level of GSH slowly dropped to approximately 10% of the initial value after 32 h of incubation in leaf discs from both transgenic and control plants. No significant differences were observed between the transgenic and control plants in the degradation rate of
GSH.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In transgenic plants overproducing AtGGT, the
-GT activity is
high in the leaves, whereas no activity is detected in the leaves of
control plants, at least under our assay conditions. This observation
allowed us to use crude protein extracts from the transgenic plants to
study the catalytic properties of AtGGT without further purification.
We show that AtGGT is a membrane-bound protein localized on the plasma
membrane outside the cell. This result is consistent with most data
concerning mammalian enzymes, which have been shown to have the same
cellular localization (Meister et al., 1981
; Taniguchi and Ikeda,
1998
). In contrast, the yeast enzyme is confined not only to the plasma
membrane (Payne and Payne, 1984
), but also to the vacuolar membrane
(Jaspers and Penninckx, 1984
). Existing data on the cellular
localization of plant
-GTs are controversial. Two isoforms of
-GT
from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit have been
reported to be exclusively membrane-bound proteins (Martin and Slovin,
2000
). Steinkamp and Rennenberg (1984)
attributed only 30% of the
total
-GT activity in a tobacco suspension culture to
the plasma membrane-bound fraction and the remaining 70% to the
cytoplasm. This result was explained either by the enzyme solubilization during the tissue homogenization step or by the existence of several
-GT isoforms in tobacco (Steinkamp and
Rennenberg, 1984
). The Arabidopsis database search revealed that the
plant
-GT is represented by a multigene family, in which the protein products may have different cellular localizations and serve different functions.
The protein gel-blot analysis strongly suggests that AtGGT is a
heterodimer that is formed from the cleavage of the single-chain precursor with the large and small subunits of approximately 41 and 29 kD, respectively, as determined from the protein gel-blot hybridization. Moreover, the amino acid sequence of the cleavage site
is well conserved in all
-GT sequences available, and the AtGGT
sequence is no exception to this rule (Fig. 1). The data are in a good agreement with other reports showing that all
-GTs from bacteria, yeast, and mammals that have been studied to date, to
our knowledge, are post-translationally cleaved into two subunits with
molecular masses ranging from 38 to 72 kD for the large subunit and
from 21 to 66 kD for the small subunit (Taniguchi and Ikeda, 1998
). It
is noteworthy that such a high variation in the molecular masses can be
explained by a high glycosylation of the animal (Taniguchi and Ikeda,
1998
) and plant enzymes (Lancaster and Shaw, 1994
; Martin and Slovin,
2000
).
Previous studies concerning purified
-GT from plants reported that
the enzymes were single polypeptides with highly variable molecular
masses: 12.5 kD in the ackee plant (Kean and Hare, 1980
), 43 kD in
tomato fruits (Martin and Slovin, 2000
), 56.7 kD in onion (Lancaster
and Shaw, 1994
), and 180 kD in kidney bean (Goore and Thompson, 1967
).
These differences can be explained by the existence of different enzyme
isoforms, by partial proteolysis of the purified proteins, or by
glycosylation, in the case of the very high-molecular masses.
The catalytic properties of AtGGT are very similar to those of other
-GTs studied to date. When the artificial substrate GPNA is used,
the kinetics constants are in the same range as those described for the
mammalian, yeast, bacterial, and plant enzymes (Table I). However, a
discrepancy in the enzyme affinity toward GSH is found in different
-GTs of plant origin.
-GT purified from onion has a
Km value of 4.97 mM
for GSH (Lancaster and Shaw, 1994
). Indirect evidence presented by
Steinkamp and Rennenberg (1984)
also confirmed that GSH is a poor
substrate for
-GT from a tobacco suspension culture, challenging the
assumption that plant
-GT may function in vivo as an enzyme of the
GSH catabolism. On the other hand, two
-GTs isolated from tomato
fruits (Martin and Slovin, 2000
) have a high affinity to GSH
(Km values 90 and 110 µM). Like the enzymes from tomato fruits, AtGGT
has a high affinity to GSH (Km value 255 µM), which strongly suggests that GSH can be
used in vivo by AtGGT as the main donor substrate.
If we assume that AtGGT can use GSH, the AtGGT-overproducing transgenic
plants may be an interesting experimental system to study the role of
-GT in GSH metabolism. We did not find a significant difference in
either the steady-state levels of GSH or in the GSH to GSSG ratio in
transgenic plants when compared with control plants under "normal"
conditions. Moreover, the GSH degradation rate was essentially the same
in transgenic and control plants.
Although seemingly surprising, this fact makes direct sense
when the extracellular localization of AtGGT is borne in mind. For
example, under "normal conditions" the apoplast of barley (Hordeum vulgare) does not contain detectable amounts of GSH
(Vanacker et al., 1999
), which probably explains why the increase in
the
-GT activity brought about by the AtGGT overproduction did not lead to a higher GSH degradation rate and why the endogenous
-GT activity was practically undetectable in the control plants. However, the situation can dramatically change when plants are challenged by
biotic or abiotic stresses. In case of barley, the hypersensitive response to the mildew pathogen results in the increased GSH synthesis rate with the amount of apoplastic GSH rising to 2% of the total GSH
content. Under such conditions, AtGGT potentially can play a role in
GSH salvage and recycling as does the animal enzyme.
In conclusion, AtGGT is very similar to the mammalian enzyme in its in vitro biochemical properties, molecular structure, and cellular localization. Its possible in vivo role in GSH metabolism requires further investigation.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial Strains
For the molecular cloning procedures, the Escherichia
coli strain JM109 (Promega, Madison, WI) was used, and
expression of the D22-6x-His fusion was carried out in the E.
coli BL21(DE3) strain (Promega). Agrobacterium
tumefaciens strain C58C1RifR (pGV2260; Deblaere et
al., 1985
) was used for the transformation of tobacco plants.
Transformation of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Plants and Analysis of the Transgene Integration and Expression
Tobacco SR1 (Maliga et al., 1975
) was used for the generation of
stable transformants according to the procedure of leaf disc cocultivation (De Block et al., 1987
). Potential transgenic lines were
analyzed by DNA and RNA gel-blot hybridizations. In both procedures,
Hybond-N membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK)
were used, and hybridizations were done under stringent conditions
according to the manufacturer's specifications. Genomic DNA was
isolated using DNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA was
isolated with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD).
Probes were labeled with Redivue [32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci
mmol
1) with the Rediprime DNA labeling kit (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
Molecular Cloning Procedures
For the expression of D22 cDNA in transgenic plants, a plant
expression cassette pDH51 (Pietrzak et al., 1986
) was used containing the 35S promoter and the 3'nos transcription terminator.
The vector was digested with the restriction enzyme XbaI
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The resulting 5'-protruding ends were
dephosphorylated with calf intestinal phosphatase (Promega) followed by
end-filling with the Klenow fragment (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). D22
cDNA was cut out from the pFL61 yeast (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae) vector with NotI (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) and ligated with the vector after the ends were
filled in with the Klenow fragment. The resulting fusion between the
promoter cDNA and the terminator was excised from the vector with
EcoRI (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and subcloned into
the plant SalI-linearized (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
transformation vector pGSC1704 (Aventis CropScience, Gent, Belgium).
Before the ligation, the cohesive ends were converted to blunt as
described above. The resulting construct was used for plant transformation.
For the expression of the D22 cDNA in E. coli as a 6x-His fusion, the expression vector pET-19b (Novagen, Madison, WI) was used. The cDNA has been amplified with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with a pair of specific primers containing the NdeI site in frame with the 6x-His tag sequence of the expression vector. The amplified cDNA was digested with NdeI (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and ligated with the correspondingly digested and dephosphorylated vector.
Antibody Production
AtGGT was purified from the E. coli-overproducing
D22-6x-His fusion on His-affinity resin (Qiagen) under denatured
conditions according to the manufacturer's instructions. The produced
protein was insoluble and appeared in the SDS gel as a single band of the expected molecular mass of approximately 60 kD. Because the protein
was insoluble, it was suspended in phosphate-buffered saline buffer to
immunize rabbits according to a standard immunization protocol (Harlow
and Lane, 1988
) of subcutaneous antigen administration with boost
injections after 14, 28, and 84 d after the first antigen administration at the Laboratory of Hormonology (Marloie, Belgium).
Protein Extraction for the Analysis of
-GT Activity and
Protein Gel-Blot Hybridization
Typically, 5 g of tobacco leaf tissue was homogenized in
liquid nitrogen and resuspended in 25 mL of cold extraction buffer, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl,
and one tablet of a protein inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics,
Brussels). All procedures were carried out at 4°C. At this point, an
aliquot was taken and, after the cell debris had been precipitated by centrifugation at 20,000g, used to determine the
activity in the soluble fraction. To obtain a final NaCl concentration
of 0.5 M, 5 M NaCl solution was added to the
remainder of the homogenate. The homogenate was incubated for 30 min
with periodical steering to allow solubilization of membrane-bound
proteins. The homogenate was cleared by centrifugation at
20,000g, and proteins were precipitated by addition of
crystalline ammonium sulfate to 70% saturation. Precipitated proteins
were collected by centrifugation at 20,000g and diluted
in 3 mL of homogenization buffer. The protein extract was desalted on
the Econo-Pac 10DG column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and used for the
-GT activity assay. As an alternative, for the protein gel blots,
total proteins were isolated by using the phenol extraction method to
prevent protein degradation (Hurkman and Tanaka, 1986
). Protein
concentration in the samples was measured according to the method of
Bradford (1976)
.
The protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE with a Mini-Protean II apparatus (Bio-Rad) and subsequently blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond C super, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with a mini trans-blot electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Antisera against AtGGT were used at a dilution of 1:1,000,000 (v/v). For the primary antibody detection, the secondary anti-rabbit peroxidase-linked goat antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used in combination with the Renaissance ECL detection kit (NEN Life Science Products, Boston).
-GT Activity Assay
Standard
-GT activity assays were performed with GPNA
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis; Orlowski and Mister, 1963
) as donor
substrate and the dipeptide Gly-Gly (Sigma) as an acceptor substrate.
The assay was carried out in 96-well microtiter plates. The release of
PNA was monitored with a SpectraMAX 250 microplate spectrophotometer system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at 405 nm (
= 8,800). A
standard reaction was carried out typically in a volume of 300 µL and
contained 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM GPNA,
40 mM Gly-Gly, and 200 µg of the protein extract. One
unit of enzyme is defined as the amount that releases 1 µmol PNA
min
1 at 20°C. For the determination of the enzyme
activity in a pH range of 6.0 to 7.5, piperazine-N,N'-bis(ethanesulfonic acid) buffer was used at 0.1 M. All amino acid acceptors were
used at 40 mM concentration.
To determine the kinetics parameters, a time course of the reaction at
different concentrations of GPNA was recorded.
Km and Vmax were
determined from a Lineweaver-Burk plot as described (Wilson and
Goulding, 1986
). For the Ki determination,
the reaction was performed at different concentrations of GSH, and a
Lineweaver-Burk plot for each GSH concentration was constructed.
Ki was determined as a negative intercept of
a secondary plot of the slopes of the primary plots against the GSH
concentration on the GSH concentration axis (Wilson and Goulding,
1986
).
Reaction of AtGGT with GSH was done in a total volume of 50 µL with
0.1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM GSH, 10 mM Met (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 µCi of Redivue
[35S]Met (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and 200 µg of a
protein extract. As a positive control and marker for
-Glu-Met, a
reaction with bovine kidney
-GT (Sigma-Aldrich) was used. Before the
reaction with GSH, the bovine enzyme was titrated in a reaction with
GPNA to have approximately the same activity as the protein extract from a transgenic plant. The reaction was carried out at 20°C and was
stopped after 30 min by adding an equal volume of absolute ethanol.
After incubation on ice for 10 min and removal of the protein
precipitate, 2 µL of the reaction was analyzed by ascending thin-layer chromatography on Polygram CEL 300 plates
(Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) in a
pyrydine:butanol:water (1:1:1, v/v) buffer system. The reaction
products were visualized on a phosphor imager (model 445SI, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
For the AtGGT activity tests with intact protoplasts, tobacco mesophyll
protoplasts were isolated from the leaves of transgenic and control
plants according to a standard protocol (Kushnir et al., 1991
).
Protoplasts (106 mL
1) were incubated
in the standard reaction mix with GPNA supplemented with 0.4 M sorbitol. After 1 h of incubation, protoplasts were floated by centrifugation at 100g, and the underlying
supernatant was used to determine the amount of PNA released.
Determination of the AtGGT Cellular Localization
For the confocal microscopy, leaf discs with a diameter of 8 mm
cut from transgenic and control plants were vacuum infiltrated with a
solution containing 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM
-glutamyl-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin, 40 mM
Gly-Gly, briefly washed in water, and mounted in water. The leaf discs
were examined with a 20×/0.5 Plan-Neo fluor lens on a LSM510 laser
scanning confocal microscope (Karl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY). Images
were obtained with the Enterprise UV laser (351 and 364 nm) with the
band-pass emission filter 385 to 470 nm. Optical sections were taken
and maximal brightness was projected using the LSM510 software package
supplied with the microscope. The images were converted to black and
white for best contrast.
GSH Content Determination
The GSH content was analyzed according to the HPLC method
described by Willekens et al. (1997)
.
Determination of the Rate of GSH Breakdown
To determine the GSH breakdown rate, 0.8-cm-diameter leaf discs from transgenic or control plants were vacuum infiltrated with 1 mM L-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (Sigma-Aldrich) or water (negative control). At certain time points, four leaf discs from transgenic or control plants were taken to determine the GSH content.
Computer Analysis
For computer analyses, software from the Genetics Computer Group (Madison, WI) was used. Multiple sequences were aligned with the PILEUP Program and the aligned sequences were edited with the SeqVu program (The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney). Pair-wise amino acid sequence similarities were calculated with the GAP program (Genetics Computer Group). For the homology searches, the BLAST program was used. The searches were done at http://www.bork.embl-heidelberg.de and http://Arabidopsis.org. Prediction of the cellular localization was made by using the PSORT program at http://psort.nibb.ac.jp/form.html.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Gilbert Engler and Tom Beeckman for
-GT cellular
localization determination, Srikrishnan Mani for thin-layer
chromatography and fruitful discussions, Martine De Cock for help in
preparing the manuscript, and Rebecca Verbanck for excellent artwork.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received September 28, 2001; returned for revision October 11, 2001; accepted December 6, 2001.
1 This work was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (grant no. G004796).
2 Present address: Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Route de St-Cyr, F-78026 Versailles cedex, France.
3 Present address: Fruitteeltcentrum, Willem de Croylaan 442, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
* Corresponding author; e-mail diinz{at}gengenp.rug.ac.be; fax 32-9-264-5349.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010887.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-glutamyl transpeptidase: concomitant formation of leukotriene D4 and
-glutamyl amino acids.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
79: 1088-1091
-glutamyl transpeptidase-deficient mice.
J Biol Chem
272: 12305-12310
-glutamyl transpeptidase activity is involved in prevention of apoptosis and maintenance of proliferation in U937 cells.
FASEB J
13: 69-79
-glutamyl transpeptidase-dependent H2O2 production and S-thiolation.
Free Radic Biol Med
27: 623-635
-Glutamyl transpeptidase from kidney bean fruit: I. Purification and mechanism of action.
Biochim Biophys Acta
132: 15-26
- and
-glutamylaspartic acid.
Agric Biol Chem
31: 490-493
-glutamyl-transpeptidase is a vacuolar enzyme.
Biochimie
66: 71-74
-Glutamyltrans-peptidases in the metabolism of
-glutamyl peptides in plants.
Phytochemistry
21: 1233-1239
-glutamyltransferase responsible for the synthesis of
-L-glutamyl-D-alanine in pea seedlings.
Biochim Biophys Acta
716: 194-200
-Glutamyl transpeptidase of the ackee plant.
Phytochemistry
19: 199-203
-glutamyl transpeptidase in onions: evidence for in vivo role as a peptidase.
Phytochemistry
36: 1351-1358
-glutamyl transpeptidase-deficient mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93: 7923-7926
-glutamyl transpeptidases from tomato exhibit high affinity for glutathione and glutathione S-conjugates.
Plant Physiol
122: 1417-1426
-Glutamyl transpeptidase.
In
WB Jakoby, ed, Detoxication and Drug Metabolism. Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 77. Academic Press, New York, pp 237-253
-Glutamyl-p-nitroanilide: a new convenient substrate for determination and study of L- and D-
-glutamyltranspeptidase activities.
Biochim Biophys Acta
73: 679-681
-Glutamyltransferase is not involved in the bulk uptake of amino acids, peptides or
-glutamyl-amino acids in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
Biochem J
218: 147-155
-glutamyl transpeptidase from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
Phytochemistry
24: 1913-1918
-glutamyl transpeptidase.
Anal Biochem
100: 136-139
-Glutamyl-transpeptidase in tobacco suspension cultures: catalytic properties and subcellular localization.
Physiol Plant
61: 251-256
-glutamyltranspeptidase.
Z Naturforsch
40c: 29-33
-Glutamyl transpeptidase: catalytic mechanism and gene expression.
In
DL Purich, ed, Amino Acid Metabolism. Part A: Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Microbiology, Vol. 72. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 239-278
-glutamyl donors in
-glutamyl transpeptidase.
J Biol Chem
252: 6792-6798
-Glutamyl transpeptidase in plants.
Phytochemistry
3: 33-46
-glutamyltransferase in transgenic V79 Chinese hamster cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88: 7361-7365This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Heeg, C. Kruse, R. Jost, M. Gutensohn, T. Ruppert, M. Wirtz, and R. Hell Analysis of the Arabidopsis O-Acetylserine(thiol)lyase Gene Family Demonstrates Compartment-Specific Differences in the Regulation of Cysteine Synthesis PLANT CELL, January 1, 2008; 20(1): 168 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Martin, P. H. Saladores, E. Lambert, A. O. Hudson, and T. Leustek Localization of Members of the {gamma}-Glutamyl Transpeptidase Family Identifies Sites of Glutathione and Glutathione S-Conjugate Hydrolysis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 1715 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zechmann, G. Zellnig, and M. Muller Immunocytochemical localization of glutathione precursors in plant cells J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo), June 1, 2006; 55(3): 173 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Cairns, M. Pasternak, A. Wachter, C. S. Cobbett, and A. J. Meyer Maturation of Arabidopsis Seeds Is Dependent on Glutathione Biosynthesis within the Embryo Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 446 - 455. [Abstract] |