Plant Physiol, March 2002, Vol. 128, pp. 783-783
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
 |
Dear Editor: |
TOP
Dear Editor:
|
The recent article "Why Leaves
Turn Red in Autumn. The Role of Anthocyanins in Senescing Leaves of
Red-Osier Dogwood" (Feild TS, Lee DW, Holbrook NM [2001]
Plant Physiol 127: 566-574) provokes me to write in
protest, yet again, about the illogical and teleological propensities
that continue to infect our science. The proper answer to the question
posed is simply that some leaves turn red because in the course of
their development, red pigments are produced as chlorophyll is
declining. But this is not what the authors mean by the question. They
wish to have an answer that provides a "reason" for the reddening
and assume, at the outset, that the outcome must be some benefit to the
plant. In essence, they propose that, fully aware of the effects of
accessory photosystem II photon efficiency, the exposed leaves of the
plant deliberately produce red pigments in order to reduce light
absorption by the chloroplasts. This, in turn, by tortuous speculation,
is supposed to result in greater recovery of N from the senescing leaves (although no such evidence is provided).
However, I am not so much concerned here with the experimental results
or the conclusions. Rather, I wish to challenge again the
anthropomorphic proposition that implies in one way or another, and
however delicately or indirectly, that plants have the ability to plan
their structure and even destiny. This is the teleological trap that I
have discussed previously (Beevers H [1993] Annu
Rev Plant Physiol 41: 1-12) and which others allude to much
earlier. The continued references to all manners of "strategies" in
plants
strategies of phloem loading, of pollination, of defense against disease, and even the absurdity of evolutionary strategies
all imply that deliberate choices designed for a successful outcome have
been made by plants.
It is of course perfectly reasonable to inquire whether the reddening
of particular leaves confers on them any functional advantage over
others not so endowed, but to suggest, for a moment, that the leaves
redden to protect themselves from a potential danger is, I submit, indefensible.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.900027.
Harry Beevers
Department of Biology University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists