Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 16, 2002; 10.1104/pp.001016

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/2/717    most recent
pp.001016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Basse, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kahmann, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Basse, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kahmann, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Basse, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kahmann, R.

Plant Physiol, June 2002, Vol. 129, pp. 717-732

Evidence for a Ustilago maydis Steroid 5alpha -Reductase by Functional Expression in Arabidopsis det2-1 Mutants1


Christoph W. Basse,* 2 Christine Kerschbamer, Markus Brustmann, Thomas Altmann, and Regine Kahmann2

Institut für Genetik und Mikrobiologie der Universität München, Maria-Ward-Strasse 1a, D-80638 Munich, Germany (C.W.B., C.K., M.B., R.K.); and Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Karl Liebknecht Strasse 25, D-14476 Golm, Germany (T.A.)


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LITERATURE CITED

We have identified a gene (udh1) in the basidiomycete Ustilago maydis that is induced during the parasitic interaction with its host plant maize (Zea mays). udh1 encodes a protein with high similarity to mammalian and plant 5alpha -steroid reductases. Udh1 differs from those of known 5alpha -steroid reductases by six additional domains, partially predicted to be membrane-spanning. A fusion protein of Udh1 and the green fluorescent protein provided evidence for endoplasmic reticulum localization in U. maydis. The function of the Udh1 protein was demonstrated by complementing Arabidopsis det2-1 mutants, which display a dwarf phenotype due to a mutation in the 5alpha -steroid reductase encoding DET2 gene. det2-1 mutant plants expressing either the udh1 or the DET2 gene controlled by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter differed from wild-type Columbia plants by accelerated stem growth, flower and seed development and a reduction in size and number of rosette leaves. The accelerated growth phenotype of udh1 transgenic plants was stably inherited and was favored under reduced light conditions. Truncation of the N-terminal 70 amino acids of the Udh1 protein abolished the ability to restore growth in det2-1 plants. Our results demonstrate the existence of a 5alpha -steroid reductase encoding gene in fungi and suggest a common ancestor between fungal, plant, and mammalian proteins.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LITERATURE CITED

The basidiomycete Ustilago maydis is a facultative biotrophic fungus that grows in a yeast form in culture. The pathogenic life cycle is initiated when compatible, haploid sporidia fuse and form a filamentous dikaryon, which is able to penetrate into host tissue (Snetselaar and Mims, 1993; Mills and Kotzé, 1981; for review, see Banuett, 1995). Prerequisites for compatibility are different a and b loci (for review, see Kahmann et al., 2000). The a locus encodes a pheromone-based recognition system required for mating (Bölker et al., 1992; Spellig et al., 1994). The b locus encodes the homeodomain proteins bE and bW that trigger pathogenic development of the dikaryotic hyphae (Kronstad and Leong, 1990; Schulz et al., 1990; Gillissen et al., 1992).

The pathogenic phase is characterized by extensive hyphal growth within the infected plant tissue followed by karyogamy and differentiation of the diploid teliospores (Banuett and Herskowitz, 1996). The plant reacts to the infection by tumor formation, which is associated with cell enlargement and proliferation (Snetselaar and Mims, 1994; I. Potrykus, personal communication). For more than four decades, it has been speculated that phytohormones, like auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins released by U. maydis, may trigger the morphological alterations in the host (Wolf, 1952; Turian and Hamilton, 1960; Mills and van Staden, 1978; Sokolovskaya and Kuznetsov, 1984; Basse et al., 1996). However, up to now there is no convincing evidence, to our knowledge, that these compounds are responsible for tumor induction. Another class of hormones that have a wide distribution throughout the plant kingdom and that control plant growth and development are brassinosteroids (Mandava, 1988; for review, see Altmann, 1998; Clouse and Sasse, 1998). In Arabidopsis, det2-1 mutants defective in brassinolide biosynthesis have been isolated (Chory et al., 1991). They are characterized by dramatic dwarfism, dark green leaves as consequence of an increased number of chloroplasts in a reduced cell volume, reduced male fertility and apical dominance, and delayed senescence and flowering (Chory et al., 1991; Li et al., 1996; for review, see Altmann, 1998; Clouse and Sasse, 1998). det2-1 plants are mutated in the DET2 gene, which encodes a steroid 5alpha -reductase with high similarities to mammalian steroid 5alpha -reductases. To date, DET2 represents the only cloned plant steroid 5alpha -reductase. In mammals, this class of enzyme catalyzes the NADPH-dependent conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, the potent androgen in male sex differentiation (for review, see Russell and Wilson, 1994). Detailed metabolic investigations have shown that the Arabidopsis DET2 protein catalyzes the 5alpha -reduction of (24R)-24-methylcholest-4-en-3-one to (24R)-24-methyl-5alpha -cholestan-3-one, the third step in a four-step process leading to the formation of campestanol from campesterol (Li et al., 1996; Fujioka et al., 1997; Noguchi et al., 1999). In microorganisms, the only gene with similarity to steroid 5alpha -reductases resides in the genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (GenBank accession no. T39193), however, evidence for a function as steroid 5alpha -reductase is lacking.

Here, we describe the U. maydis udh1 gene, which encodes a protein with high similarity to known steroid 5alpha -reductases from mammals and Arabidopsis and provide evidence for its function by complementation of Arabidopsis mutants homozygous for det2-1.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LITERATURE CITED

Isolation of udh1

A number of U. maydis genes that are strongly expressed during the tumor stage of infected maize (Zea mays) plants have been identified by applying the method of differential display (Basse et al., 2000, 2002). One of these U. maydis genes is udh1 (for U. maydis DET2 homolog). A fragment comprising the udh1 3' portion was used to identify genomic clones from a U. maydis cosmid library. Sequence analysis of a genomic AgeI-HindIII fragment revealed an open reading frame (ORF) of 1,164 bp encoding a predicted protein of 388 amino acids with an estimated molecular mass of 42.3 kD (Fig. 1). The absence of introns in the udh1 ORF sequence and the presence of a poly(A) site were demonstrated by the isolation of cDNA clones and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis (Fig. 1; see "Materials and Methods"). The deduced amino acid sequence of the udh1 gene is most similar to those of type 1 steroid-5 alpha -reductases from mammals (Andersson and Russell, 1990; Lopez-Solache et al., 1996), the Arabidopsis DET2 protein (Li et al., 1996), and a putative steroid reductase from S. pombe (GenBank accession no. T39193), with 30% sequence identity to the mammalian and plant enzymes and 35% sequence identity to the predicted S. pombe protein (Fig. 2A). For comparison, the Arabidopsis DET2 and rat type 1 steroid-5alpha -reductase (rS5R1) proteins share 41% sequence identity. In a number of positions, the Udh1 sequence matched either the mammalian or the Arabidopsis sequence (Fig. 2B), implying a common ancestor protein. In support of a function as steroid-5alpha -reductase, the Glu-311 residue of the Udh1 protein aligned with an invariant Glu residue of mammalian enzymes that is absolutely required for activity. This residue is also conserved in DET2 but is replaced by Lys-204 in the mutant det2-1 protein (Fig. 2A; Li et al., 1996). Furthermore, the Gly-52 residue of the Udh1 sequence matched the conserved Gly-34 residue of human type 2 steroid-5alpha -reductase (hSR2) implicated in testosterone binding (Thigpen and Russell, 1992). In addition, Udh1 contains five (Arg-266, Pro-295, Gly-297, Asn-307, and Arg-380) of six conserved amino acids that are part of a cofactor binding domain typical for mammalian 5alpha -reductases (for review, see Russell and Wilson, 1994). The Udh1 amino acid sequence remarkably differed in length from known 5alpha -steroid reductases by about an additional 130 amino acids (Fig. 2A). The additional amino acids are inserted in six stretches (I-VI) and comprise positions 1 to 25 (I), 80 to 102 (II), 174 to 213 (III), 222 to 234 (IV), 271 to 289 (V), and 330 to 348 (VI). Two of these stretches (II and V) also partially exist in the S. pombe ORF sequence (Fig. 2A) and emphasize the closer relationship between the fungal proteins. The U. maydis amino acid sequence contained eight potential transmembrane-spanning domains according to the program TMPRED, of which four aligned with the transmembrane-spanning domains of rS5R1 predicted by the same program (Fig. 2A). Two of the additional transmembrane domains in the U. maydis ORF sequence overlapped with stretches II and III. Thus, the U. maydis Udh1 seems to form a distinct class among 5alpha -steroid reductases.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Nucleotide sequence and derived amino acid sequence of udh1. Shown is the DNA sequence of the 1,722-bp genomic AgeI-HindIII fragment (GenBank accession no. AF502086) containing the udh1 gene. The translation start ATG codon is underlined and the stop codon of udh1 is indicated by an asterisk. Primers used for generating udh1-eGFP fusions are indicated by arrows. The deletion in Delta udh1 strains comprised the region from Phe-78 to Ala-358 (boxed). The poly(A) site is indicated at position 1,453.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Multiple alignment of Udh1 with other 5alpha -reductase sequences. A, Udh1, U. maydis Udh1; SP5R, putative S. pombe 5alpha -reductase; DET2, Arabidopsis DET2; rS5R1, rat type 1 5alpha -reductase. Amino acids (numbered at the borders) dominating a column are boxed and shaded. Gaps have been inserted to maximize the number of identities. Predicted transmembrane helices of Udh1 and rS5R1 are in boldface and emphasized by bars (gray for Udh1 and black for rS5R1). The highly conserved Glu residue, which is altered in the det2-1 mutant and corresponds to Glu-311 of Udh1, is marked by a dot. Conserved positions within Udh1 stretch V and the respective region of SP5R are boxed. B, Assignment of amino acids from the Udh1 sequence to matching positions from either the rS5R1 (top) or the DET2 (bottom) amino acid sequence. Amino acids are numbered from the N to C terminus.

Expression of udh1

As judged by northern analysis the U. maydis udh1 gene was expressed at similar levels during budding growth of haploid sporidia and during filamentous growth of either dikaryotic hyphae resulting from a cross of haploid strains FB1 and FB2 or the solopathogenic, diploid strain FBD11 (Fig. 3A). During biotrophic growth, udh1 transcripts were detected 3 d after inoculation, which coincides with an increase of fungal mass and the onset of visible tumor development (Fig. 3B). udh1 transcript levels were markedly increased 7 and 8 d after inoculation compared with the barely detectable transcript levels of the constitutively expressed ppi gene during biotrophic growth (Fig. 3B). This reflects the small amount of fungal biomass within infected leaves and emphasizes up-regulation of the udh1 gene during tumor formation, thus, explaining the identification of the udh1 gene by differential display analysis at this stage. Standardized in comparison with the ppi signal strength, udh1 transcript levels were 26-fold increased 7 d postinoculation compared with those in strain FB2 during axenic growth.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.   Expression analysis of udh1. A, U. maydis strains indicated at the top were grown on CM charcoal for 2 d before RNA isolation. Five to 15 µg of RNA was loaded in each lane. B, Lane 1, RNA (15 µg) from strain FB2 grown on CM charcoal for 2 d. Lanes 2 through 9, RNA (5 µg; 2 µg in lane 9) prepared from infected maize tissue between 2 and 12 d after inoculation with a mixture of strains FB1 and FB2. The northern blots were probed with a 32P-labeled udh1 cDNA fragment (positions 1,019-1,449 in Fig. 1). A and B, Radioactive signals were quantified (boxed) and standardized (FB2 = 1) by comparison with signals obtained by hybridization with the constitutively expressed U. maydis ppi gene. Staining with methylene blue reflected the amounts of total RNA loaded. The fungal and maize ribosomal RNA bands are indicated.

Localization of Udh1

Previous studies have indicated that human and rat 5alpha -steroid reductase isozymes reside in either the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or the nucleus depending on the tissue source of the enzyme as demonstrated by immunological detection and sedimentation analysis of enzyme activity (for review, see Russell and Wilson, 1994). To localize the U. maydis Udh1 protein, the green fluorescent protein encoding eGFP gene was translationally fused to the 3' end of udh1. Two independent U. maydis strains CL13/pugh1#8 and CL13/pugh1#10 harboring ectopic insertions of the udh1:eGFP fusion construct under control of udh1 promoter sequences were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. EGFP fluorescence mainly resided in the periphery of nuclei, which were localized by 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Fig. 4). This is indicative for localization of the Udh1 protein in membranes of either the nucleus or the ER, which is continuous with the nuclear membrane. In addition, fluorescent patches were visible at the cell periphery, which are indicative for the typical ER network structure in close vicinity to the plasma membrane (Fig. 4; Pichler et al., 2001; Wedlich-Söldner et al., 2002).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.   Localization of Udh1. U. maydis strains CL13/pugh1#8 (column A), CL13/pugh1#10 (column B) harboring ectopic insertions of the udh1-eGFP fusion construct, and strain CB35 (Basse et al., 2000; column C), expressing the eGFP gene under the constitutive strong otef promoter, were grown in YEPS medium and assayed by differential interference contrast (DIC) light microscopy (top row), and epifluorescence to detect eGFP (medium row) and DAPI (bottom row) distribution. The bar represents 10 µm. Bottom, Schematic depiction of the udh1-eGFP fusion construct. udh1 ORF promoter and 3' sequences are depicted by grayed arrows and bars, respectively.

Complementation of Arabidopsis det2-1 Mutants

Previous investigations have demonstrated that the Arabidopsis DET2 gene was functional in cultured human cells and, conversely, human 5alpha -steroid type 1 and type 2 reductases could complement Arabidopsis det2-1 mutants (Li et al., 1997). To investigate whether udh1 encodes a functional 5alpha -steroid reductase, the udh1 gene was introduced into the binary vector pBAR-35S in such a way that expression was driven by the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (Odell et al., 1985). Homozygous Arabidopsis det2-1 and wild-type Columbia (Col-0) plants carrying the resulting plasmid pBUB1 were generated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and selection for Basta resistance. Transgenic lines from two independent transformation experiments were investigated in four series (Table I). All transgenic lines were tested for the insertion of the udh1 gene into their genomes by PCR using primers derived from the CaMV 35S promoter and a primer located in the 3'-untranslated udh1 sequence and by a subsequent sequence analysis of the PCR products (Table I). This analysis confirmed the transgene in most plants analyzed but also revealed its absence in a few homozygous det2-1 plants, implying that Basta selection was not completely tight. As expected, these plants showed a dwarf phenotype (Table I). To confirm the genetic background of all transgenic lines, cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) analysis based on the absence of the MnlI site at position 610 in the det2-1 ORF was employed (Fig. 5; Table I). Whereas PCR products amplified from Col-0 DNA contained a MnlI restriction fragment of 152 bp, a 193-bp MnlI fragment was retrieved from amplified det2-1 DNA (Fig. 5). Three of the investigated descendants from infiltrated homozygous det2-1 plants that resisted Basta selection were heterozygous (DET2/det2-1) and have probably emerged from cross-pollination (Table I). In all cases, plants that carried the transgene were homozygous with respect to the det2-1 allele.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I.   Analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines

Transgenic lines from two independent transformation experiments were investigated in four series.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.   Genotypic verification by CAPS analysis. A, Schematic representation of CAPS analysis. Numbers refer to MnlI restriction sites and respective fragments. The 152-bp MnlI fragment (boxed) is only contained in wild-type fragments. B, Representative example of CAPS analysis. PCR products obtained from amplification with primers det3h/det3r were restricted with MnlI and subjected to Southern analysis using the DET2 EcoRV fragment as probe (see "Materials and Methods"). Minor signals above the expected MnlI bands in the various lanes reflect incomplete digests of PCR products.

Northern analysis was performed to determine whether transgenic plants carrying the pBUB1 constructs expressed the transgene (Fig. 6A). RNA was extracted from leaves of det2-1/pBUB1#1, 2, 8, and 12 plants (see Fig. 7D) and probed with the udh1 gene. RNA preparations from Arabidopsis Col-0 and U. maydis FB1 were included as control to exclude cross-hybridization of the udh1 gene with Arabidopsis RNA and to indicate the length of the U. maydis udh1 transcript. Expression of the udh1 transgene was detected in all pBUB1 transformants (Fig. 6A, lanes 1-4). The udh1 transcript size of pBUB1 transformants was larger than that of the endogenous udh1 gene expressed in U. maydis, implying differences in transcription start sites conferred by the different promoters.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.   Expression analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. A and B, RNA (0.3-1.8 µg) from the indicated plants (see "Materials and Methods") and from U. maydis strain FB1 (20 µg) grown on CM charcoal for 2 d was loaded. Radioactive signals were quantified (boxed) on both membranes and standardized (det2-1/pBUB1#1 = 100) by comparison to signals obtained after subsequent hybridization with the Arabidopsis 32P-labeled actin probe (ACT2). A, RNA from wild-type Col-0 plants 62 d after sowing was included as control. The northern blot was probed with the 32P-labeled AgeI-HindIII udh1 fragment. Arrowheads indicate the full-length udh1, the truncated udh1 (udh1Delta N70), the U. maydis endogenous udh1, and the actin transcript. The actin signal in the U. maydis lane is caused by cross-hybridization with the ACT2 probe. The different sizes of the udh1 and udh1Delta N70 transcripts were also reflected by faster migration of the truncated udh1 transcript. B, RNA from two different wild-type Col-0 and det2-1 mutant plants 61 d after sowing was included as control. The northern blot was probed with the 32P-labeled DET2 EcoRV fragment. DET2 and ACT2 transcripts are indicated by arrowheads. Faintly detectable endogenous DET2 transcripts are indicated by asterisks.



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7.   Development of Arabidopsis pBUB1, pBDET2, and pBUA1 transformants. A to C, Plants from series 2, 42 d after sowing. A, Wild-type Col-0. B, Mutant det2-1. C, Mutant det2-1 transgenic for pBUB1. Arrows indicate terminal flowers that developed in Col-0 and transgenic det2-1 plants. D and E, Plants from series 3, 61 d after sowing. D, Mutant det2-1 transgenic for pBUB1 (det2-1/pBUB#1, 2, 8, and 12). Seed pods are indicated by arrows. E, Wild-type Col-0 plants. Seed pods have not yet developed. F to H, Plants from series 4, 43 d after sowing. F, Transformants det2-1/pBDET2#1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 are numbered from 5 to 10. det2-1 plants carrying the pBDET2 construct (5-10) display seed pod development (arrows). Homozygous det2-1 (1-3) and heterozygous DET2/det2-1 (4) plants that escaped Basta treatment but lacked the transgene. G, Control wild-type Col-0 plants. H, pBUA1 transgenic det2-1 plants (2 and 3) are phenotypically indifferent from a det2-1 plant (1) that escaped Basta selection but lacked the transgene.

Transformed plants were compared with homozygous det2-1 mutants and wild-type Col-0 plants at different time points. Under the experimental conditions employed, Col-0 plants rarely displayed elongated shoots or flowers 42 d after sowing but normally required an additional period of at least 10 d for further development (Fig. 7A; Table I). At the same stage, control det2-1 plants showed a characteristic dwarf phenotype, small dark green leaves, and lacked flowers (Fig. 7B; Table I). All homozygous Arabidopsis det2-1 lines harboring the udh1 transgene remarkably were no longer dwarfs. Instead, they displayed an elongated main stem and developed flowers even earlier than wild-type Col-0 plants, indicating accelerated development due to the transgene (Fig. 7C; Table I). In addition, these plants differed from Col-0 plants by a reduced size and number of rosette leaves (Fig. 7, A and C). During further growth, transgenic plants showed accelerated seed pod development and additionally differed from wild-type Col-0 plants by excessively elongated stems, which were unable to keep the plant in an upright position (Fig. 7, D and E; Table I). The phenotype of Col-0 plants carrying pBUB1 resembled the one of det2-1/pBUB1 transformants with respect to accelerated elongation of the main stem, flower, and seed pod formation. However, main stems were more stable and the number of rosette leaves was less severely reduced than in the det2-1 transformants (Table I; data not shown).

To test whether the phenotype of pBUB1 transformants relied on the Udh1 function or were a consequence of overexpression, transgenic det2-1 lines expressing the DET2 gene under control of the CaMV 35S promoter were generated (see "Materials and Methods"). The genomic DET2 sequence was introduced into pBAR-35S and the resulting vector pBDET2 was transformed into homozygous det2-1 plants.

Transformants det2-1/pBDET2#1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 were analyzed for DET2 expression (Fig. 6B). This indicated expression of the transgene in all cases, whereas expression of the endogenous gene was barely detectable in wild-type Col-0 or mutant det2-1 plants (Fig. 6B, lanes 6-8). The expected position of the transgenic DET2 transcript was deduced from the faint endogenous DET2 signal of Col-0 and det2-1 RNA preparations. The presence of transcripts heterogeneous in size may reflect the use of different transcription start sites in transgenic plants. Strongly elevated DET2 expression levels like in the det2-1/pBDET2#3 transformant were not reflected by additional phenotypic alterations compared with the det2-1/pBDET2#1 transformant, which expressed the transgene at a 10-fold reduced level (see below), pointing to saturation in the conversion of the DET2 reaction product.

Like det2-1/pBUB1 transformants, all det2-1/pBDET2 transformants displayed long, thin stems, few rosette leaves of reduced size, and accelerated flower and seed pod development (Fig. 7, F and G; Table I), indicating that overexpression of either the udh1 or the DET2 gene accounted for the morphological differences compared with wild-type Col-0 plants.

The Udh1 amino acid sequence contained an N-terminal extension, which was absent in known 5alpha -steroid reductases (see Fig. 2A). To assess whether a truncated ORF starting from the second in-frame-positioned Met-71 codon resulted in a functional enzyme, the plasmid pBUA1 was constructed, which was derived from pBAR-35S by insertion of the 5'-truncated udh1 ORF. All of the five investigated det2-1/pBUA1 transformants were indistinguishable from homozygous det2-1 plants (Fig. 7H; Table I). This implicates the functional importance of the N-terminal 70 amino acids for Udh1 activity. From the relatively high expression levels of det2-1/pBUA1#13, 14, and 16 transformants determined by northern analysis (Fig. 6A, lanes 6-8), we infer that the inability of the truncated udh1 gene to restore growth in det2-1 transformants did not reflect the absence of transgene expression.

Accelerated Growth in the T2 Progeny under Different Light Conditions

To further investigate whether a general stress response from repeated Basta selection promoted the observed growth difference between wild-type and transgenic plants, we analyzed the T2 progeny derived from selfing of the T1 det2-1/pBUB1#1 plant (series 1). According to Mendelian inheritance, three-fourths of the T2 progeny should carry at least one copy of the transgene. Seedlings derived in the absence of Basta selection from T1 det2-1/pBUB1 and Col-0 were transferred to individual pots and either kept in the greenhouse with a 12-h photoperiodicity or transferred to the phytochamber with a 16-h photoperiodicity. Of the investigated T2 progeny from T1det2-1/pBUB1 plants, 78% displayed rescued growth (Table II), indicative for the presence of the transgene. As expected, some T2 plants (22%) displayed a dwarf phenotype reminiscent of det2-1 mutant plants. All of these plants lacked the transgene (Table II), demonstrating a strict linkage between its presence and rescued growth in the T2 progeny. Under long-day conditions development of transgenic T2 plants was weakly favored compared with F1 Col-0 plants, as illustrated from accelerated stem and flower bud formation and from seed pod development between 31 and 35 d after sowing (Table II; Fig. 8, D and E). Furthermore, stems from 19 of 22 T2det2-1/pBUB1 plants exhibited lengths between 10 and 19.5 cm compared with stems of the Col-0 variety with only 1 of 10 having elongated to a length of 10 cm 35 d after sowing (data not shown). Surprisingly, differences became more apparent upon exposure to a shorter photoperiod.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II.   Analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis T2 lines under different light conditions



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8.   Development of T2det2-1/pBUB1 plants (series 5 and 6) compared with F1Col-0 plants. A to C, Plants from series 5, 33 d after sowing. D to F, Plants from series 6, 33 d after sowing. All presented T2det2-1/pBUB1 plants, four (B), and six (E) Col-0 plants, respectively, were analyzed with respect to the genotype and the presence (A and D) or absence (B, C, E, and F) of the transgene. Growth conditions were as specified in Table II. A and D, T2det2-1/pBUB1. B and E, Wild-type Col-0. C and F, T2det2-1/pBUB1 that displayed a dwarf phenotype and lacked the transgene. Each pot contains two plants. The numbers in D refer to the plants used for northern analysis (see Fig. 9).

Although development of F1 Col-0 plants exposed to a 12-h photoperiod was attenuated compared with growth under long-day conditions (Table II; Fig. 8, B and E), development of det2-1/pBUB1 plants was comparable under both light conditions, as illustrated by early flowering and seed pod development between 31 and 35 d after sowing (Table II; Fig. 8, A and D). This suggests that udh1 overexpression can compensate for reduced light conditions and demonstrates the accelerated growth phenotype in the absence of Basta selection. In addition, all det2-1/pBUB1 plants developing under reduced light conditions differed from Col-0 plants by decreased numbers of rosette leaves and weakened stem stability, as already noticed in the T1 plants (Fig. 8A; data not shown). Northern analysis of transgenic T2 plants from series 6 demonstrated udh1 expression in all investigated plants. Although transgene expression levels were severely reduced in the T2det2-1/pBUB1#9 plant, they still exceeded the faintly detectable endogenous det2-1 expression levels (Fig. 9). The T2det2-1/pBUB#11 and 12 plants displayed significantly reduced stem lengths and had not-yet-developed flowers despite udh1 transcript levels as high as in the fully developed T2det2-1/pBUB1#4 plant (Fig. 8D; Fig. 9), indicating that extensive overexpression was not sufficient to promote accelerated growth in all plants under the chosen conditions. Similar results were obtained when udh1 transcript levels were determined by northern analysis in T2det2-1/pBUB1 plants that all displayed accelerated growth under a 12-h photoperiodicity (see Fig. 8A). From six analyzed plants, five exhibited comparable levels of strong overexpression, whereas accumulation of udh1 transcripts was 10-fold reduced in one plant, indicating that moderate levels of overexpression are sufficient for accelerated growth under reduced light conditions (data not shown). In all cases, udh1 transcript levels significantly exceeded those of the endogenous det2-1 gene of T2det2-1/pBUB1 plants and the DET2 gene of wild-type Col-0 plants from the same series, respectively (data not shown).



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9.   Expression of the udh1 gene in differently developed transgenic Arabidopsis plants. RNA (1 µg) isolated from rosette leaves of T2det2-1/pBUB1 plants from series 6, 33 d after sowing and from U. maydis strain FB2 (4 µg) grown on CM charcoal for 2 d was loaded (see "Materials and Methods"). Northern blots were probed with the 32P-labeled AgeI-HindIII udh1 fragment, the DET2 EcoRV fragment, and the Arabidopsis 32P-labeled actin probe (ACT2) as loading control. The ratio of quantified signals (udh1/ACT2) was calculated (arrowhead). Staining with methylene blue reflected the amounts of total RNA loaded. The full-length udh1, endogenous U. maydis udh1, ACT2, and the fungal and maize ribosomal RNA bands are indicated (arrowheads). Bottom, Developmental stage of investigated plants 35 d after sowing: B, Flower bud; F, flower; S, seed pods. The numbers refer to stem lengths in centimeters.

Deletion Analysis of udh1 in U. maydis

To assess the function of the udh1 gene in U. maydis, the respective ORF was deleted in compatible, haploid U. maydis strains (see "Materials and Methods"). Such strains were viable, microscopically indistinguishable from wild-type cells, and not affected in growth (data not shown). Three independent Delta udh1 strain combinations were assessed for pathogenicity in sweet corn (Zea mays var Early Golden Bantam). Tumors comparable in morphology and size with wild-type tumors developed in 47 of 76 plants after infection with Delta udh1 combinations, which compares with tumor formation (33 of 42) by the respective wild-type strains FB1 and FB2. Furthermore, the udh1 gene was deleted in the haploid strain SG200, which is solopathogenic due to the presence of a hybrid b locus composed of the compatible bE1 and bW2 genes. Again, the frequency of tumor development was comparable in plants (sweet corn var Early Golden Bantam) inoculated with either SG200Delta udh1 (72 of 79 plants) or SG200 strain (34 of 35 plants). In addition, the development of teliospores was unaffected by the udh1 deletion (data not shown). A reduction in virulence of Delta udh1 strains may possibly be reflected by attenuated biotrophic growth. We, therefore, inoculated mixtures of four independent SG200Delta udh1 and wild-type SG200 strains and determined their ratio in individual tumors 10 d postinoculation (sporulation stage). Intensities of strain-specific fragments amplified from Delta udh1 and wild-type strains were comparable when using DNA from preparations of tumors A to C, whereas the Delta udh1-specific fragment was slightly less efficiently amplified from DNA preparation of tumor D (Fig. 10A). This indicated that Delta udh1 mutants were able to proliferate at the same rate as wild-type strains during infection. To assess the possibility of gene redundancy, Southern hybridization was performed under non-stringent conditions using an udh1 fragment, which spanned the deleted ORF region of the mutant allele (Fig. 10B). Although genomic fragments of the expected sizes were detected in restricted chromosomal DNA from wild-type strain SG200, distinct cross-hybridizing signals were not detectable in restricted chromosomal DNA from two independently generated SG200Delta udh1 strains. Under the chosen non-stringent hybridization conditions a 2,504-bp BamHI fragment, which overlapped with only 43 bp of the udh1 probe, showed weak hybridization. This suggests that genes homologous to udh1 are either absent in U. maydis or have become highly diverged.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10.   Analysis of Delta udh1 strains. A, Detection of SG200 and SG200Delta udh1 strains in maize tumors. Chromosomal DNA (75 ng) isolated from tumors 10 d after inoculation with mixtures of SG200/SG200Delta udh1#12 (Tum A), SG200/SG200Delta udh1#15 (Tum B), SG200/SG200Delta udh1#20 (Tum C), and SG200/SG200Delta udh1#21 (Tum D) was used as template for PCR with the primer combinations a and b (see "Materials and Methods"). Expected sizes of PCR products were the 622-bp fragment of the hph gene flanked by udh1 5'-ORF sequences (a) and the 643-bp udh1 fragment (b). The numbers above the lanes refer to the PCR cycles performed. Phage lambda (M) DNA (500 ng) digested with PstI was used as size marker. The sizes of the respective fragments are indicated in basepairs. B, Non-stringent Southern analysis of wild-type SG200, SG200Delta udh1#20, and SG200Delta udh1#21 strains. Chromosomal DNA isolated from the strains indicated was restricted with either BamHI or SalI, and probed with a udh1 fragment spanning the deletion of the mutant udh1 allele. Attribution of sizes to the hybridizing bands is indicated (arrowheads). The sizes of cross-hybridizing lambda PstI fragments are marked on the right.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LITERATURE CITED

Our studies provide molecular evidence for the existence of a 5alpha -steroid reductase in U. maydis, which, based on sequence alignment (see Fig. 2, A and B), likely arose from a common ancestor between fungi, plants, and animals. However, the Udh1 amino acid sequence is unique with respect to six additional protein stretches whose significance remains to be determined. Two of them overlapped with predicted transmembrane domains, suggesting that the Udh1 protein may be more tightly embedded in the lipid bilayer than mammalian steroid 5alpha -reductases, which contain four putative transmembrane domains. Membrane localization of monkey type 1 and type 2 and human and rat steroid-5alpha -reductases have been described (Andersson et al., 1989; for review, see Russell and Wilson, 1994; Levy et al., 1995). For the mammalian proteins, evidence was provided that they reside in either the ER or the nuclear membrane depending on the tissue investigated. However, a conclusive discrimination remains difficult because the perinuclear localization may reflect the state of the ER, which is continuous with the nuclear membrane (for review, see Russell and Wilson, 1994). Fluorescence microscopy of single U. maydis cells expressing an Udh1-eGFP fusion protein corroborates the predicted localization of steroid-5alpha -reductases in membranes of the ER. Although the Udh1 sequence contains an ER retention element (HDEIL) at position 258, it is unclear whether this is functional because these elements are generally positioned at the C-terminal end (for review, see Pelham, 1990). As an alternative, the Udh1 protein may be associated with a protein targeted to the ER.

To determine whether udh1 encodes a functional 5alpha -steroid reductase, transgenic Arabidopsis plants carrying the udh1 gene under control of the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter were generated. In all cases, transformation with pBUB1 rescued the dwarf phenotype of Arabidopsis det2-1 plants. Intriguingly, all transformants displayed accelerated stem growth and flower and seed development compared with wild-type Col-0 plants. Because both pBUB1 and pBDET2 transformants promoted the same phenotype in homozygous det2-1 plants, increased levels of 5alpha -steroid reductase activity, which may encounter elevated levels of brassinosteroids, are responsible for accelerated development compared with wild-type Col-0 plants. This is consistent with the low endogenous DET2 expression levels in wild-type Col-0 plants (see Fig. 6B). The reduction in size and number of rosette leaves and the formation of thin, elongated steps in plants overexpressing 5alpha -steroid reductase may be the consequence of an imbalanced concentration of brassinosteroids. The phenotypic differences observed in T1 transgenic plants did not result from repeated Basta selection, because the accelerated growth phenotype was stably inherited to the T2 generation in the absence of Basta treatment. Under a 16-h photoperiod, individual developmental differences of det2-1/pBUB1 plants were still maintained in the T2 generation despite similar overexpression levels, whereas under reduced light conditions, accelerated growth dominated. The observation that phenotypic differences between det2-1/pBUB1 and wild-type Col-0 plants were strongly favored under a 12-h photoperiod compared with a 16-h photoperiod of the same light intensity suggests that enhanced levels of 5alpha -steroid reductase activity can compensate for low-light conditions, consistent with a role of brassinosteroids in photomorphogenesis (Clouse, 1997). This conclusion agrees with the recent observation that Arabidopsis antisense lines of the CPD gene, which is implicated in brassinosteroid biosynthesis, exhibit a more delayed development compared with wild-type plants if exposed to low-light conditions (Schlüter et al., 2002). All investigated plants expressed transgene levels that strongly exceeded those of the endogenous DET2 gene. This points to saturated levels of 5alpha -steroid reductase activity and may explain why differences in the strength of overexpression were not reflected by an additional growth phenotype.

To verify the translational start codon of udh1, the DNA sequence encoding the region between Met-1 to Met-71 was deleted. This has indicated that the less conserved N-terminal portion of the Udh1 protein, which corresponds to the N-terminal 58 amino acids of the rat rS5R1 protein is crucial for activity. A four-amino acid segment (VSIV) and the conserved Gly residue (matching Gly-52 of Udh1) suggested in substrate binding of the rat type 1 enzyme and human type 2 enzyme, respectively (Thigpen and Russell, 1992), are contained in this region.

Enzymes of steroid metabolism have been described in fungi. 17beta -hydroxy-steroid-dehydrogenase activity was detected in Cochliobolus lunatus and S. pombe (Lanisnik et al., 1992; Dlugonski and Wilmanska, 1998). 5alpha -Steroid reductase activity was detected in Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium crustosum, which in culture were able to reduce the 4,5-double bond in testosterone to give dihydrotestosterone (Cabeza et al., 1999). Which role these enzymes play in fungal growth or development remains to be shown. The finding that U. maydis Delta udh1 strains are unaffected in growth, virulence, and tumor induction capacity rules out the possibility that this enzyme is responsible for the synthesis of a plant hormone. However, an alternative mechanism for the Delta 4-5 reduction cannot be excluded. In mammals, steroid 5alpha -reductases exist as type 1 and type 2 isoforms implicated in catabolic and anabolic functions, respectively (Normington and Russell, 1992; for review, see Russell and Wilson, 1994), and the genome of Arabidopsis reveals the presence of a steroid 5alpha -reductase-like protein (GenBank accession no. T51384). Because the Udh1 sequence was more similar to mammalian type 1 enzymes, a possible catabolic function may be envisaged. However, screening the U. maydis genome sequence (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and Southern analysis provided no evidence for the existence of a second 5alpha -steroid reductase (data not shown). The S. pombe genome sequence revealed the existence of only one putative 5alpha -steroid reductase encoding gene, whereas a related gene was absent in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This seems to imply that some but not all fungi can profit from this enzymatic activity. Taking the elevated udh1 expression during the tumor stage into account, it remains an attractive possibility that U. maydis takes advantage of this enzyme during completion of its sexual life cycle in the plant. Therefore, it will be challenging to identify the endogenous substrate for the fungal enzyme.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LITERATURE CITED

Plant Material, Strains, and Growth Conditions

The standard wild-type genotype used was Arabidopsis Col-0. The det2-1 mutation is in the Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0 background (Chory et al., 1991). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101pMP90RK (Koncz and Schell, 1986), kindly provided by Dr. R. Kunze (Köln, Germany) transformed with the pBAR-b 35S derived vector constructs (see below) was used to transform Arabidopsis Col-0 and det2-1 plants by the vacuum infiltration method (Bechtold et al., 1993). Seeds were incubated in potting soil for 2 d at 8°C to induce germination. Five days after maintenance with a 16-h photoperiod (5,000 lux) at 21°C, seedlings were subjected to four cycles of Basta (0.01% [v/v] Basta [Aventis CropScience, Strasbourg, France] in 0.01% [v/v] Silwet L-77; Lehle Seeds, Round Rock, TX) selection in 1-d intervals. Basta-resistant seedlings were transferred to individual soil pots and maintained with a 16-h photoperiod at 21°C. To assess the influence of the udh1 transgene on development, a T2 progeny was harvested from mature siliques of self-pollinated det2-1/det2-1 plants carrying the pBUB1 transgene, and a F1Col-0 progeny line was obtained from self-pollinated Col-0 plants. Seeds were stored under identical conditions and plants were grown as specified in Table II.

Haploid Ustilago maydis strains FB1 (a1b1), FB2 (a2b2), and the diploid strains FBD11 (a1a2b1b2) have been described (Banuett, 1995). CL13 (a1bE1bW2) and SG200 (a1a2bE1bW2) are solopathogenic haploid strains (Bölker et al., 1995). Cells were grown at 28°C in yeast/peptone/Suc (YEPS; Tsukuda et al., 1988) or complete medium (CM; Holliday, 1974). To test for mating, strains were cospotted on charcoal containing potato dextrose plates and incubated at room temperature for 48 h. Plant infections were done as described (Basse et al., 2000) with the sweet corn var Early Golden Bantam (Olds Seed, Madison, WI). Escherichia coli K12 strain DH5alpha (Bethesda Research Laboratories, Bethesda, MD) and TOP10 (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used as hosts for plasmid amplification.

DNA and RNA Procedures

U. maydis chromosomal DNA was prepared according to Hoffman and Winston (1987). Maize (Zea mays) and Arabidopsis chromosomal DNA was isolated with the DNEasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Transformation of U. maydis followed the protocol of Schulz et al. (1990). RNA from U. maydis grown on solid medium and U. maydis-infected maize tissue was isolated according to Schmitt et al. (1990). Total RNA was extracted from Arabidopsis plants with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) or the NucleoSpin RNA II Kit (CLONTECH, Heidelberg). Radioactive labeling of DNA was performed with the megaprime DNA labeling kit (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). Detection and quantification of the signals was done using a STORM PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and the ImageQuant software. Nucleotide sequences were determined by automated sequencing using an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston). All PCR products were sequenced. Southern hybridization under non-stringent conditions was performed at 55°C. Stringent washing steps were omitted. All other DNA manipulations followed standard procedures as described by Sambrook et al. (1989). Nucleotide sequences were compared using the BLAST program (Altschul et al., 1997). Prediction of transmembrane helices were made with TMPRED (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html).

Plasmids and DNA Fragments

For subcloning and sequencing, plasmids pUC18, pUC19 (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech), and pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen) were used. The U. maydis cosmid library has been described (Bölker et al., 1995). Hygromycin (hph) and carboxin resistance (ip: encoding succinate dehydrogenase) cassettes and the ppi fragment (Bohlmann, 1996) as selectable markers and probes, respectively, for U. maydis have been described (Basse et al., 2000). The eGFP gene (CLONTECH) was excised as a 1,030-bp NcoI-EcoRV fragment from plasmid p123 (Aichinger, 2000). Udh1 was contained in cosmids 9B4, 9B10, and 29C12. A genomic AgeI-HindIII fragment of 1,722 bp that contained the udh1 gene was isolated from cosmid 9B4. Plasmid pudh1 contained the end-filled genomic AgeI-HindIII fragment in the SmaI site of pUC19. A. tumefaciens transformation vector pBAR-b 35S (kindly provided by Dr. R. Kunze, Köln, Germany) is a derivative of pGPTV-BAR (Becker et al., 1992) and contains the BAR gene as selectable marker and the CaMV 35S promoter and termination sequences for transgene expression. The udh1 fragment used for non-stringent Southern hybridization spanned positions 491 to 1,324 in Figure 1.

Differential Display and Isolation of udh1 cDNA Clones

Differential display was performed as described (Basse et al., 2000). Two individual RNA preparations from leaf tumor tissue 6 d after inoculation and mock-infected control leaf tissue were reverse-transcribed using T11CG and T11GG primers. For PCR amplification, the oligo(dT) primers from the first step combined with a 10-mer primer with a defined but arbitrary sequence (5'-SCCATGCACG-3') were used. The 0.8-kb EcoRI-BamHI fragment spanning the 3' portion of udh1 was used as probe to isolate two independent cDNAs from a cDNA library of FBD11 (Schauwecker et al., 1995). Both clones terminated approximately 100 bp downstream of the predicted translational initiator ATG codon. The remaining 5' end of the cDNA was obtained by RT-PCR with DNase-treated RNA isolated from leaf tumors 6 d after inoculation with strains FB1 and FB2 as described (Basse et al., 2000) using the forward primer Bspe (5'-GGACTAGTCCATGTCGATCCTCACCTGGATC-3'; positions 251-272 in Fig. 1) and the reverse primer ABsp (5'-TTGATCGAAGGCGAGAAGAGC-3'; positions 566-586 in Fig. 1).

eGFP-udh1 Fusion Constructs and Microscopy

For construction of the udh1:eGFP fusion construct pugh1, pudh1 was amplified with the forward primer udh1-2 containing a EcoRV restriction site (5'-TGTCGATATCTACCTTTCCGAAATTACCAC-3'; positions 1,419-1,438 in Fig. 1) and the reverse primer udh1-1 containing a NcoI restriction site (5'-AGGTCCATGGAGACAAAAGGGATGATTGCC-3'; positions 1,394-1,413 in Fig. 1). PCR reactions were performed in the presence of Taq precision polymerase (Stratagene, Amsterdam) using parameters as described (Basse et al., 2000). PCR products were cleaved with EcoRV and NcoI and ligated to the eGFP gene isolated as NcoI-EcoRV fragment to yield pug1. The sequence of the amplified udh1 gene showed one deviation at the wobble position of the Ala-206 codon, which, therefore, did not alter the amino acid sequence. The plasmid pugh1 was generated from pug1 by ligating the hph cassette as end-filled NotI fragment into the EcoRV site. The 6,274-bp SspI-SphI fragment was isolated from pugh1 and ectopically integrated into U. maydis strain CL13 (strains CL13/pugh1#8 and CL13/pugh1#10). For Southern analysis to confirm ectopic integration, genomic DNA was cleaved with BamHI and probed with the udh1 AgeI-HindIII fragment. U. maydis cells grown in YEPS medium were fixed with 4% (w/v) formaldehyde and stained with 0.5 µg mL-1 DAPI (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) for 15 min at 60°C and subsequent washing with phosphate-buffered saline. Samples were observed with differential interference contrast optics or under fluorescence microscopy (excitation/emission for DAPI: 365 nm/>397 nm; excitation/emission for eGFP: 450-490 nm/515-565 nm) using an Axiophot (Zeiss Jena, Germany).

A. tumefaciens Transformation Vectors

Plasmids pBUB1 and pBUA1 were derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae vectors p426ADH-udh-B1 and p426ADH-udh-A1, which contained the full-length udh1 gene and a 5'-truncated udh1 gene fragment, respectively (C. Basse, unpublished data). For construction of p426ADH-udh-B1 and p426ADH-udh-A1, the udh1 5' portions were amplified from pudh1 using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and the primer combinations Bspe/ABsp and Aspe610 (5'-GGACTAGTCCATGGAGATTCCTTCGCCCATC-3'; positions 461-482 in Fig. 1)/ABsp, respectively. Primers Aspe610 and Bspe contained SpeI restriction sites. PCR products were restricted with SpeI/BamHI and ligated into the respective sites of p426ADH1#1041 (kindly provided by Dr. R. Kunze, Köln, Germany) to yield p426AuB1 and p426AuA1, respectively. p426ADH-udh-B1 and p426ADH-udh-A1 were obtained by ligating the BamHI fragment, which contained the 3' portion of the udh1 gene (positions 534-1,629 in Fig. 1), into the BamHI sites of p426AuB1 and p426AuA1, respectively. The end-filled HindIII-SpeI fragments containing the udh1 gene were isolated from p426ADH-udh-B1 and p426ADH-udh-A1, respectively, and ligated into the SmaI site of pBAR-b 35S. The resulting vectors were termed pBUB1 and pBUA1, respectively. The DET2 gene was isolated from genomic Col-0 DNA by PCR in the presence of Pfu polymerase, the forward primer udhe5n (5'-AATTGATATCCCCGAAAAATGGAAGAA-ATCG-3'; positions from -8 to +13 in the DET2 ORF), and the reverse primer udhe3n (5'-AAACGATATCGGAATTAAACCGGTTACTGG-3'; positions 78-97 downstream of the DET2 ORF). Both primers contained EcoRV recognition sites. Sequence analysis of the genomic DET2 clone confirmed the presence of a short intron with a length of 85 bp inserted at position 397 of the DET2 ORF (Li et al., 1996). However, two alterations to the sequence described by Li et al. (1996) were detected (a C to G transversion and a C to T transition at positions 516 and 592, respectively). Whereas the first substitution affected the wobble position of the Arg-172 codon, the latter resulted in an Arg-198 to Cys conversion. A comparison with the respective region on chromosome 2 of Arabidopsis (GenBank accession no. AC007661) revealed the same alterations as determined in the amplified DET2 sequence, which we, therefore, consider to be correct. The PCR product was cloned into the SmaI site of pUC18 to yield pUCDET2. The EcoRV fragment was reisolated from pUCDET2 for insertion into the SmaI site of pBAR-b 35S to yield pBDET2.

Genotype and Expression Analysis of Arabidopsis Transformants

The presence of constructs pBUA1 and pBUB1 in A. tumefaciens and Arabidopsis was verified by PCR using the primer combination C13 (5'-ATCTCCACTGACGTAAGGGATGACG-3'; binds in the CaMV 35S promoter)/ABsp and the combination C13/udh511 (5'-CAGTGTGGTAATTTCGGAAAGG-3'; positions 1,421-1,442 in Fig. 1), respectively. The pBDET2 construct was detected by PCR using the primer combination C13/det2r (5'-GCAATGTACCA-CTTGTGACTCG-3'). All PCR products were sequenced from both ends. In addition, the PCR product of the det2-1/pBUB1#1 transformant (series 1) was completely sequenced. This indicated the presence of the complete and correct udh1 ORF sequence. Control PCR using the primer combinations C13/udh511 and C13/det2r performed with DNA from Col-0 and det2-1 plants did not result in PCR products of the expected size. To confirm the genetic background of analyzed plants, chromosomal Arabidopsis DNA was amplified with the primers det3h (5'-GTCGGACCGCACTTTGGTACG-3')/det3r (5'-CGAGTCTTGG-GATACTCTTCC-3'), which primed in the close context of the polymorphic MnlI site for subsequent RFLP analysis using the DET2 EcoRV fragment as probe. The G610 to A transition of the det2-1 ORF was additionally confirmed by sequence analysis of all PCR products (series 1) cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO. To analyze the genotype of pBDET2 transformants, an initial PCR was performed using primers detx (5'-AATTCCATAACCCGAAAAATGG-3') and dety (5'-GTTGTGCATTGTTGAAGATACC-3'), which both bind adjacent to the DET2 sequence present in pBDET2. Gel-purified PCR products were reamplified using the primer combination det3h/det3r for RFLP analysis. For expression analysis, RNA was isolated from leaves of det2-1/pBUB1#1, 2, 8, and 12 and wild-type Col-0 plants (series 3) 62 d after sowing; det2-1/pBUA1#13 and 14 plants (series 4) 61 after sowing; det2-1/pBUA1#16 (series 4) 75 d after sowing; and det2-1/pBDET2#1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 plants (series 4) and two different wild-type Col-0 and det2-1 mutant plants (series 2) 61 d after sowing; as well as from T2 progeny plants (see Fig. 9).

Construction of udh1 Deletion Strains

For construction of the udh1 deletion plasmid, pudh1 was amplified with the forward primer udet3 (5'-AAGGCCTCCTAGAGCTACCAACGGTCAC-3'; positions 1,326-1,346in Fig. 1) and the reverse primer udet1 (5'-AAGGCCTGATGGGCGAAGGAATCTCC-3'; positions 464-482 in Fig. 1), which both contain a StuI restriction site. The deletion comprised the complete udh1 ORF except the initial 231 bp at the 5' end and the terminal 91 bp at the 3' end. PCR parameters were as described (Basse et al., 2000). PCR products were cleaved with StuI and ligated to the hph cassette as an end-filled BamHI-EcoRV fragment to yield pudh1ko. To replace the resident udh1 gene with the hph cassette, a 4,434-bp SspI-SphI fragment was isolated from pudh1ko and transformed into U. maydis strains FB1, FB2, and SG200. For Southern analysis, genomic DNA was cleaved with either AgeI/HindIII or BamHI and probed with the udh1 containing AgeI-HindIII fragment. Because udh1 null-mutants were generated only in strains SG200 and FB2, FB1 udh1 null-mutants were obtained from the sexual offspring of a cross between FB2Delta udh1 and FB1.

Detection of U. maydis DNA in Maize Tissue Infected with Mixtures of SG200 and SG200Delta udh1 Strains

Maize plants (var Early Golden Bantam) were inoculated with mixtures of SG200 and SG200Delta udh1 cultures adjusted to a density of 7 to 10 × 107 cells mL-1. Four independent SG200Delta udh1 strains were used. In each case, DNA was prepared from a single leaf tumor of an infected maize plant 10 d after inoculation using the DNEasy plant kit (Qiagen). Chromosomal DNA was used as template for PCR under standard conditions. The following primer combinations were used to amplify fragments from (a) the hph gene flanked by udh1 5' ORF sequences and (b) the udh1 gene: (a) 5'-GCAGGTTCGCGTTCGATAGC-3'/5'-CCATGCAGTCTACGCAGTCG-3'; (b) 5'-CCGTGTTGCA-GCCATTGAGG-3'/5'-GGGAAAGAGACAGGGTGGTG-3'.Primer combinations a and b resulted in comparable amplification efficiencies using identical amounts of chromosomal DNA from either SG200Delta udh1(a) or SG200 (b) strains as template.

Distribution of Materials

Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be made available in a timely manner for non-commercial research purposes, subject to the requisite permission from any third-party owners of all or parts of the material. Obtaining any permission will be the responsibility of the requestor.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Kathrin Auffarth for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

Received November 26, 2001; returned for revision January 21, 2002; accepted March 25, 2002.

1 This work was supported by the Leibniz program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and through grant no. SFB369.

2 Present address: Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Department of Organismic Interactions, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse, D-35043 Marburg, Germany.

* Corresponding author; e-mail basse{at}mailer.uni-marburg.de; fax 49-6421-178-509.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.001016.


    LITERATURE CITED
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LITERATURE CITED

  • Aichinger C (2000) Identifizierung pflanzenabhängig-regulierter Gene in Ustilago maydis. PhD thesis. LMU München, Munich, Germany
  • Altmann T (1998) A tale of dwarfs and drugs: brassinosteroids to the rescue. Trends Genet 14: 490-495[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Andersson S, Bishop RW, Russell DW (1989) Expression cloning and regulation of steroid 5 alpha-reductase, an enzyme essential for male sexual differentiation. J Biol Chem 264: 16249-16255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Andersson S, Russell DW (1990) Structural and biochemical properties of cloned and expressed human and rat steroid 5 alpha-reductases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 3640-3644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Banuett F (1995) Genetics of Ustilago maydis, a fungal pathogen that induces tumors in maize. Annu Rev Genet 29: 179-208[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Banuett F, Herskowitz I (1996) Discrete developmental stages during teliospore formation in the corn smut fungus, Ustilago maydis. Development 122: 2965-2976[Abstract]
  • Basse CW, Kolb S, Kahmann R (2002) A maize-specifically expressed gene cluster in Ustilago maydis. Mol Microbiol 43: 75-93[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Basse CW, Lottspeich F, Steglich W, Kahmann R (1996) Two potential indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenases in the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. Eur J Biochem 242: 648-656[Medline]
  • Basse CW, Stumpferl S, Kahmann R (2000) Characterization of a Ustilago maydis gene specifically induced during the biotrophic phase: evidence for negative as well as positive regulation. Mol Cell Biol 20: 321-329
  • Bechtold N, Ellis J, Pelletier G (1993) In planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. C R Acad Sci (Paris) 316: 1194-1199
  • Becker D, Kemper E, Schell J, Masterson R (1992) New plant binary vectors with selectable markers located proximal to the left T-DNA border. Plant Mol Biol 20: 1195-1197[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Bohlmann R (1996) Isolierung und Charakterisierung von filamentspezifisch exprimiertenGenen aus Ustilago maydis. PhD thesis. LMU München, Munich, Germany
  • Bölker M, Genin S, Lehmler C, Kahmann R (1995) Genetic regulation of mating and dimorphism in Ustilago maydis. Can J Bot 73: 320-325
  • Bölker M, Urban M, Kahmann R (1992) The a mating type locus of Ustilago maydis specifies cell signaling components. Cell 68: 441-450[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Cabeza MS, Gutierrez EB, Garcia GA, Avalos AH, Hernandez MA (1999) Microbial transformations of testosterone to 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone by two species of Penicillium: P. chrysogenum and P. crustosum. Steroids 64: 379-384[Medline]
  • Chory J, Nagpal P, Peto CA (1991) Phenotypic and genetic analysis of det2, a new mutant that affects light-regulated seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3: 445-459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Clouse SD (1997) Molecular genetic analysis of brassinosteroid action. Physiol Plant 100: 702-709[CrossRef]
  • Clouse SD, Sasse JM (1998) Brassinosteroids: essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 427-451[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Dlugonski J, Wilmanska D (1998) Deleterious effects of androstenedione on growth and cell morphology of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73: 189-194[Medline]
  • Fujioka S, Li J, Choi YH, Seto H, Takatsuto S, Noguchi T, Watanabe T, Kuriyama H, Yokota T, Chory J, et al (1997) The Arabidopsis deetiolated2 mutant is blocked early in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 9: 1951-1962[Abstract]
  • Gillissen B, Bergemann J, Sandmann C, Schroer B, Bölker M, Kahmann R (1992) A two-component regulatory system for self/non-self recognition in Ustilago maydis. Cell 68: 647-657[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Hoffman CS, Winston F (1987) A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 57: 267-272[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Holliday R (1974) Ustilago maydis. In RC King, ed, Handbook of Genetics, Vol. 1. Plenum Press, New York, pp 575-595
  • Kahmann R, Steinberg G, Basse C, Feldbrügge M, Kämper J (2000) Ustilago maydis, the causative agent of corn smut disease. In JW Kronstad, ed, Fungal Pathology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 347-371
  • Koncz C, Schell J (1986) The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204: 383-396[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kronstad JW, Leong SA (1990) The b mating-type locus of Ustilago maydis contains variable and constant regions. Genes Dev 4: 1384-1395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lanisnik T, Zakelj-Mavric M, Belic I (1992) Fungal 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 78: 49-52[Medline]
  • Levy MA, Brandt M, Sheedy KM, Holt DA, Heaslip JI, Trill JJ, Ryan PJ, Morris RA, Garrison LM, Bergsma DJ (1995) Cloning, expression and functional characterization of type 1 and type 2 steroid 5 alpha-reductases from Cynomolgus monkey: comparisons with human and rat isoenzymes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 52: 307-319[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Li J, Biswasm MG, Chao A, Russell DW, Chory J (1997) Conservation of function between mammalian and plant steroid 5alpha-reductases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 3554-3559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Li J, Nagpal P, Vitart V, McMorris TC, Chory J (1996) A role for brassinosteroids in light-dependent development of Arabidopsis. Science 272: 398-401[Abstract]
  • Lopez-Solache I, Luu-The V, Seralini GE, Labrie F (1996) Heterogeneity of rat type I 5 alpha-reductase cDNA: cloning, expression and regulation by pituitary implants and dihydrotestosterone. Biochim Biophys Acta 1305: 139-144[Medline]
  • Mandava NB (1988) Plant growth-promoting brassinosteroids. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39: 23-52[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mills LJ, van Staden J (1978) Extraction of cytokinins from maize, smut tumors of maize and Ustilago maydis cultures. Physiol Plant Pathol 13: 73-80
  • Mills LJ, Kotzé JM (1981) Scanning electron microscopy of the germination, growth and infection of Ustilago maydis on maize. Phytopathol Z 102: 21-27
  • Noguchi T, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Sakurai A, Yoshida S, Li J, Chory J (1999) Arabidopsis det2 is defective in the conversion of (24R)-24-methylcholest-4-En-3-one to (24R)-24-methyl-5alpha -cholestan-3-one in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 120: 833-840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Normington K, Russell DW (1992) Tissue distribution and kinetic characteristics of rat steroid 5 alpha-reductase isozymes: evidence for distinct physiological functions. J Biol Chem 267: 19548-19554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH (1985) Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature 313: 810-812[CrossRef][Medline]
  • Pelham HR (1990) The retention signal for soluble proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum. Trends Biochem Sci 15: 483-486[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Pichler H, Gaigg B, Hrastnik C, Achleitner G, Kohlwein SD, Zellnig G, Perktold A, Daum G (2001) A subfraction of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum associates with the plasma membrane and has a high capacity to synthesize lipids. Eur J Biochem 268: 2351-2361[Web of Science][Medline]
  • Russell DW, Wilson JD (1994) Steroid 5 alpha-reductase: two genes/two enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 63: 25-61[Web of Science][Medline]
  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
  • Schauwecker F, Wanner G, Kahmann R (1995) Filament-specific expression of a cellulase gene in the dimorphic fungus Ustilago maydis. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 376: 617-625[Web of Science][Medline]
  • Schlüter U, Köpke D, Altmann T, Müssig C (2002) Analysis of carbohydrate metabolism of CPD antisense plants and the brassinosteroid deficient cbb1 mutant. Plant Cell Environ (in press)
  • Schmitt ME, Brown TA, Trumpower BL (1990) A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 3091-3092[Free Full Text]
  • Schulz B, Banuett F, Dahl M, Schlesinger R, Schäfer W, Martin T, Herskowitz I, Kahmann R (1990) The b alleles of U. maydis, whose combinations program pathogenic development, code for polypeptides containing a homeodomain-related motif. Cell 60: 295-306[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  • Snetselaar KM, Mims CW (1993) Infection of maize stigmas by Ustilago maydis: light and electron microscopy. Phytopathology 83: 843-850
  • Snetselaar KM, Mims CW (1994) Light and electron microscopy of Ustilago maydis hyphae in maize. Mycol Res 98: 347-355
  • Sokolovskaya IV, Kuznetsov LV (1984) Gibberellin-like substances in the mycelium of haploid and diploid strains of the smut fungus Ustilago-zeae. Appl Biochem Microbiol 20: 397-401
  • Spellig T, Bölker M, Lottspeich F, Frank RW, Kahmann R (1994) Pheromones trigger filamentous growth in Ustilago maydis. EMBO J 13: 1620-1627[Web of Science][Medline]
  • Thigpen AE, Russell DW (1992) Four-amino acid segment in steroid 5 alpha-reductase 1 confers sensitivity to finasteride, a competitive inhibitor. J Biol Chem 267: 8577-8583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tsukuda T, Carleton S, Fotheringham S, Holloman WK (1988) Isolation and characterization of an autonomously replicating sequence from Ustilago maydis. Mol Cell Biol 8: 3703-3709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Turian G, Hamilton RH (1960) Chemical detection of 3-indolylacetic acid in Ustilago zeae tumors. Biochim Biophys Acta 41: 148-150[Medline]
  • Wedlich-Söldner R, Schulz I, Straube A, Steinberg G (2002) Dynein supports motility of the endoplasmic reticulum in the fungus Ustilago maydis. Mol Biol Cell 13: 965-977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wolf FT (1952) The production of indole acetic acid by Ustilago zeae, and its possible significance in tumor formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 38: 106-111[Free Full Text]
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. W. Basse
Dissecting Defense-Related and Developmental Transcriptional Responses of Maize during Ustilago maydis Infection and Subsequent Tumor Formation
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2005; 138(3): 1774 - 1784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/2/717    most recent
pp.001016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Basse, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kahmann, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Basse, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kahmann, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Basse, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kahmann, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Plant Biologists