First published online May 24, 2002; 10.1104/pp.010969
Plant Physiol, June 2002, Vol. 129, pp. 774-785
Action Spectrum for Cryptochrome-Dependent Hypocotyl Growth
Inhibition in Arabidopsis1
Margaret
Ahmad,*
Nicholas
Grancher,
Mary
Heil,
Robert C.
Black,
Baldissera
Giovani,
Paul
Galland, and
Danielle
Lardemer
Universite Paris VI, Tour 53 E 5, Casier 156, 4, Place Jussieu,
75252 Paris cedex 05, France (M.A., N.G., B.G., D.L.);
Pennsylvania State University, 25 Yearsley Mill Road, Media,
Pennsylvania 19063 (M.A., M.H., R.C.B.); and FB Biologie/Botanik,
Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse, 35032 Marburg,
Germany (P.G.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cryptochrome blue-light photoreceptors are found in both plants and
animals and have been implicated in numerous developmental and
circadian signaling pathways. Nevertheless, no action spectrum for a
physiological response shown to be entirely under the control of
cryptochrome has been reported. In this work, an action spectrum was
determined in vivo for a cryptochrome-mediated high-irradiance response, the blue-light-dependent inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. Comparison of growth of wild-type,
cry1cry2 cryptochrome-deficient double mutants, and
cryptochrome-overexpressing seedlings demonstrated that responsivity to
monochromatic light sources within the range of 390 to 530 nm results
from the activity of cryptochrome with no other photoreceptor having a
significant primary role at the fluence range tested. In both green-
and norflurazon-treated (chlorophyll-deficient) seedlings, cryptochrome
activity is fairly uniform throughout its range of maximal response
(390-480 nm), with no sharply defined peak at 450 nm; however,
activity at longer wavelengths was disproportionately enhanced in
CRY1-overexpressing seedlings as compared with wild type. The action
spectrum does not correlate well with the absorption spectra either of
purified recombinant cryptochrome photoreceptor or to that of a second
class of blue-light photoreceptor, phototropin (PHOT1 and PHOT2).
Photoreceptor concentration as determined by western-blot analysis
showed a greater stability of CRY2 protein under the monochromatic
light conditions used in this study as compared with broad band blue
light, suggesting a complex mechanism of photoreceptor activation. The
possible role of additional photoreceptors (in particular phytochrome
A) in cryptochrome responses is discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Blue-light responses are
found in organisms throughout the biological kingdom; in many
instances, these responses are mediated by photoreceptors that
specifically absorb blue light and are relatively ineffective at other
wavelengths. In Arabidopsis, flavoprotein blue-light photoreceptors
known as cryptochromes have been implicated in light responses
including inhibition of hypocotyl elongation, anthocyanin accumulation,
internode and petiole elongation, seed germination,
blue-light-regulated gene expression, initiation of flowering time,
phototropism, and the entrainment of circadian rhythms (Ahmad and
Cashmore, 1996 ; Ahmad, 1999 ). Cryptochrome-type photoreceptors have recently been found in animal systems as well wherein they seem to play essential roles in the entrainment and maintenance of circadian rhythms (Sancar, 2000 ). Cryptochromes are
characterized by their striking homology to certain classes of DNA
photolyases, or blue-light-dependent DNA repair enzymes, which catalyze
a blue-light-dependent electron transfer reaction (Deisenhofer,
2000 ). In Arabidopsis there are two similar genes encoding
cryptochrome photoreceptors, CRY1 (or HY4)
and CRY2, whose encoded proteins differ primarily in their
respective C-terminal domains. In addition, the CRY1 photoreceptor is
stable in plants grown in high intensities of blue light, whereas CRY2
photoreceptor fails to accumulate and appears to be rapidly degraded
under conditions wherein the photoreceptor is active (Ahmad et al.,
1998a ; Lin et al., 1998 ). Cryptochromes contain the chromophore-binding
domain of photolyases, and have been shown to bind both a pterin and flavin chromophore; however, they lack the apparent pyrimidine dimer
binding or repair activity of photolyases (Malhotra et al., 1995 ; Lin
et al., 1995 ). In addition, some cryptochromes contain C-terminal
extensions not found in photolyases, which are shown to be necessary
for photoreceptor functions (Ahmad et al., 1995 ; Yang et al., 2000 ).
Given the striking homology of cryptochromes to photolyases, a primary
mechanism of action via blue-light-dependent electron transfer is
likely (see Ahmad and Cashmore, 1996 ; Ahmad, 1999 ; Lin, 2000 , and refs.
therein). Recent studies with fruitfly (Drosophila
melanogaster) and animal cryptochromes also suggest electron
transfer mechanisms (Lin et al., 2001 ).
Although the cryptochrome photoreceptors are well characterized and
have been studied in a variety of plant and animal systems, very little
is known about their mechanism of action and photochemistry. Photolyases, to which the cryptochrome photoreceptors are most closely
related, are unusual among flavoproteins in that they are activated
with flavin present in the reduced form. Reduced flavin, in contrast to
oxidized flavin, has a peak of absorption at around 360 nm and absorbs
very little visible light. As a result, photolyases rely on an antennae
pigment, a folate, or deazaflavin derivative for the bulk of their
activity in blue light (400-500 nm). The peak of absorption of the
antennae pigment can be between 380 to 440 nm depending on the precise
composition of the chromophore (Sancar et al., 1987 ; Ahmad and
Cashmore, 1996 ) and seems to occur at near 420 nm for purified
recombinant cryptochrome (Malhotra et al., 1995 ). By contrast, most
flavoenzymes occur in the oxidized form, showing a peak of absorption
at 450 nm, as is found in the phototropin-like photoreceptors (Briggs
et al., 2001 ). Therefore, an important clue regarding the mechanism of
action of the cryptochrome photoreceptors would be to ascertain the
absorption characteristics of the photoreceptor in its active state
within the plant. Such data is provided by the production of an action
spectrum, a dose-response curve at multiple wavelengths, for a certain
plant activity or physiological response that is under the control of
this photoreceptor.
Although many action spectra for plant blue-light responses exist in
the literature, their interpretation is complicated by the fact that
multiple plant photoreceptors in addition to cryptochromes are active
in blue light. Unrelated blue-light photoreceptors, distinct from the
cryptochromes, have recently been identified and shown to be
flavoproteins, absorbing maximally at 450 nm (Briggs and Huala, 1999 ;
Briggs et al., 2001 ). In addition, plant phytochrome photoreceptors,
which respond principally to red/far-red light, show some absorption of
blue light, rendering the interpretation of classical blue-light
action spectra more difficult (Shinomura et al., 2000 ;
Shinomura et al., 1996 ). In the case of higher plants, the situation is
even further complicated by the observation that a signal from
phytochrome is necessary for full activity of the cryptochrome
blue-light photoreceptors in hypocotyl growth inhibition and
anthocyanin accumulation (Ahmad and Cashmore, 1997 ). Therefore, it is
not possible to infer that any given published blue-light action
spectra represents the activity of cryptochrome.
In this study, an action spectrum is generated for a response
demonstrated to be under the control of cryptochrome, namely blue-light-dependent inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. In previous studies in Arabidopsis (Young et al., 1992 ; Goto et al.,
1993 ), the extent of growth inhibition resulting from cryptochrome activity (both CRY1 and CRY2) had not been determined, nor had there
been correction for potential artifacts resulting from shading of the
blue-light receptors by chlorophylls and carotenoids. In the present
study, we show that cry1cry2 double-mutant seedlings show no
measurable growth inhibition at wavelengths from 390 to 530 nm under
the given light intensities, indicating cryptochrome as the primary
photoreceptor species involved. Growth inhibition biosynthesis studies
in the presence of norflurazon, a carotenoid inhibitor resulting in
photobleaching of Arabidopsis seedlings, were performed to correct for
possible shifts in the action spectra due to shading by chlorophyll.
Further clues into possible photoreceptor mechanism of action and
photochemistry is provided by examination of action spectra of a
cryptochrome-1-overexpressing transgenic line and an analysis of
photoreceptor concentration and stability, in particular that of
light-labile CRY2. These action spectra are compared with the
absorption spectra of purified Arabidopsis blue-light photoreceptors,
and the results are discussed in relation to the known photoreceptors
that might contribute to this response in Arabidopsis and other plants.
 |
RESULTS |
Inhibition of Hypocotyl Elongation in Arabidopsis Activity Spectrum
for Cryptochrome in a High-Irradiance Response
In Arabidopsis, inhibition of hypocotyl elongation is a sensitive
and quantitative light response in which multiple photoreceptors participate, including phytochromes, CRY1, and CRY2. There are currently two published action spectra for blue-light-dependent inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis (Young et al., 1992 ;
Goto et al., 1993 ), but in neither case did the authors identify the
component of the response due solely to cryptochrome (CRY1 and CRY2).
In the present study, the growth response of wild-type Arabidopsis
seedlings was compared with that of double cryptochrome
cry1cry2 mutants, allowing unequivocal determination of an
activity spectrum for cryptochrome. In addition, the responsivity of
seedlings overexpressing CRY1 protein was evaluated for possible wavelength-specific effects, because such seedlings show a
hypersensitive response to blue light under broad band conditions (Lin
et al., 1996 ; Ahmad et al., 1998a ). In darkness, the lengths of the
hypocotyls of wild type, mutant seedlings and CRY1 overexpressors were
essentially the same (Fig. 1A). Hypocotyl
growth inhibition in light-treated seedlings was measured at multiple
light intensities at wavelengths of 10- to 20-nm intervals spanning the
range of 380- to 450-nm bandwidth, with additional points in the
red/far-red and near-UV region (not shown). The degree of inhibition of
hypocotyl growth was plotted as a percentage of the growth of seedlings
retained in complete darkness (no growth inhibition) at wavelengths in which a robust cryptochrome response was obtained (Fig. 1B). These experiments were repeated in a total of five separate trials; in all
cases, the results were qualitatively similar and internally consistent. The differential growth inhibition of seedlings lacking all
cryptochrome (cry1cry2), and containing a superabundance of cryptochrome photoreceptor (Oe) allows the determination of a high-irradiance action spectrum for a cryptochrome response.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis
seedlings. A, Hypocotyl lengths of seedlings germinated as described in
"Materials and Methods" and maintained for the indicated lengths of
time in darkness. Error bars represent the SE. Wt, Wild
type; Oe, CRY1 overexpressor; C1C2, cry1cry2 double-mutant
seedlings. B, Seedlings were plated and placed under monochromatic
light sources as indicated in "Materials and Methods." Measurements
of seedling hypocotyl growth are presented as percentages of dark-grown
control seedlings (where there is no growth inhibition). Error bars
represent the SE. OE, Transgenic seedlings
overexpressing CRY1 protein; Wt, wild-type seedlings; C1C2,
cry1cry2 double-mutant seedlings. C, Plot of cryptochrome
action spectrum for 20% and 30% hypocotyl growth inhibition,
respectively, as calculated from the data used in B. Oe, Overexpressor
of CRY1; Wt, wild type. Peaks represent peak activity (maximal
sensitivity) of the photoreceptor.
|
|
Significantly, cry1cry2 double-mutant seedlings
did not show growth inhibition at any wavelength of monochromatic light
tested between 311 and 550 nm at the photon fluence rates used in this study. Both wild-type and CRY1-overexpressing seedlings showed maximal
growth inhibition between 380 and 500 nm (Fig. 1B). Very little
response was seen below 365 nm, using UV sources of light fluence 0.5 to 1.0 µmol m 2 s 1.
From 500 to 550 nm, little growth inhibition of wild type was observed
at the output (30-50 µmol m 2
s 1) our lamps could generate, although
increased growth inhibition of CRY1-overexpressing seedlings as
compared with wild type or cry1cry2 double mutant was
observed until 550 nm (not shown). At wavelengths longer than 570 nm,
there were no detectable differences in light-dependent hypocotyl
growth inhibition between cryptochrome-deficient and
cryptochrome-overexpressing seedlings, even at quite high light
intensities (80-100 µmol m 2
s 1; not shown). This result is consistent with
cryptochromes being active principally in the range from 365 to 550 nm.
To more precisely ascertain the wavelength at which cryptochrome is
maximally effective in these seedlings, an action spectrum was
generated in which the photon fluence rate resulting in 20% or 30%
growth inhibition was plotted as a function of wavelength (Fig. 1C).
The action spectrum is plotted such that peaks occurring in the plot
correspond to peak sensitivity of the photoreceptor. In the case of
wild type, the action spectrum is almost flat with no more than a
2-fold variation in effectiveness of light between 380 and 480 nm.
Similar to wild type, the CRY1-overexpressing seedlings showed a fairly
flat action spectrum, although they were considerably more
light-sensitive than wild type at all wavelengths tested. However, in
contrast to wild type, maximal activity in the CRY1 overexpressor
occurred near 480 nm, with a greater relative responsivity at 500 nm
(only 4-fold less than that of wild type, which showed a 10-fold drop
in activity at 500 nm compared with 450 nm; Fig. 1C). Thus, increasing
the dosage of cryptochrome photoreceptor appears to result in shift of
photoreceptor sensitivity toward higher bandwidths.
A concern with the interpretation of action spectra in de-etiolated
plant material is shading by non-photoreceptor pigments, in particular
chlorophylls and carotenoids, both of which absorb in blue light. It
had been previously shown for both Sinapis alba (Beggs et
al., 1980 ) and Chenopodium rubrum (Holmes and Wagner, 1982 )
that chlorophyll significantly altered the action spectrum of hypocotyl
growth inhibition in these plant species. To correct for possible
shading artifacts, action spectra for seedling growth inhibition were
repeated on petri plates containing the herbicide norflurazon, an
inhibitor of carotenoid biosynthesis that also prevents chlorophyll
accumulation in light-grown plants (Beggs et al., 1980 ; Holmes and
Wagner, 1982 ).
Wild type, cry1cry2 mutant seedlings, and CRY1
overexpressors grown on norflurazon showed identical rates of growth in
darkness, red light (660 nm), and far-red light (713 nm; Fig.
2A). This indicates that
there was no activity of cryptochrome under these conditions, and also
that the various mutant lines were comparable in growth capacity. At
wavelengths from 392 to 530 nm, there was no observable growth
inhibition in cry1cry2 double-mutant seedlings (Fig. 2B),
indicating that no additional blue-light photoreceptor was contributing
measurably to the primary response at these wavelengths. As an
additional control, the degree of growth inhibition obtained for
seedlings at 450 nm was measured after 30 h of continuous growth
instead of 60 h. These data were compared with the data at 450 nm
obtained for growth inhibition at 60 h in Figure 2B. No difference
in fluence response characteristics was observed, indicating that no
major distortion in the action spectra is likely to occur at least
during the latter one-half of the growth period (not shown). The action
spectrum for the norflurazon-grown seedlings was calculated from the
data used for Figure 2B and plotted for 20%, 30%, and 50% growth
inhibition for wild-type and CRY1-overexpressing seedlings (Fig.
2C).


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis
seedlings grown on norflurazon. A, Hypocotyl lengths of seedlings
germinated as described in "Materials and Methods" and maintained
for the indicated lengths of time in darkness (upper panel) or for
60 h continuous growth in 660-nm red light (41 µmol
m 2 s 1) or 713 nm far
red light (29 µmol m 2
s 1). Error bars represent the SE.
Wt, Wild type; Oe, CRY1 overexpressor; C1C2, cry1cry2
double-mutant seedlings. B, Seedlings were plated and placed under
monochromatic light sources as indicated in "Materials and
Methods." Measurements of seedling hypocotyl growth are presented as
percentages of dark-grown control seedlings (where there is no growth
inhibition). Error bars represent the SE. Oe,
Transgenic seedlings overexpressing CRY1 protein; Wt, wild-type
seedlings; C1C2, cry1cry2 double-mutant seedlings. C, Plot
of cryptochrome action spectrum for 20%, 30%, and 50% hypocotyl
growth inhibition, respectively, as calculated from the data presented
in B. Oe, Overexpressor of CRY1; Wt, wild type. Peaks represent peak
activity (maximal sensitivity) of the photoreceptor.
|
|
The action spectra obtained on norflurazon for wild-type seedlings is
also fairly flat in shape with no more than 2.5-fold variation in peak
photon effectiveness in the wavelength range from 380 to 480 nm (Fig.
2C). In contrast to untreated seedlings, some growth inhibition was
observed for cry1cry2 double-mutant seedlings at 380 nm
(Fig. 2B, see 380-nm curve), indicating the activity of additional
photoreceptors absorbing in the UV that were shaded in untreated
seedlings and that were, thereby, not detected. In addition, wild-type
seedlings were more sensitive to blue light on norflurazon and
responded to lower light intensities than was the case for untreated
seedlings, again suggesting that chlorophyll significantly shades the
relevant photoreceptors in green tissues. Action spectra obtained on
norflurazon for the cryptochrome-overexpressing lines did not show a
peak near 480 nm as for untreated seedlings but, instead, showed a more
pronounced shoulder than seen for the wild type.
Differential Stability of CRY2 Protein in Broad Band and
Monochromatic Light
It has been previously shown that both CRY1 and CRY2 contribute to
the growth inhibition response in Arabidopsis (Ahmad et al., 1998a ; Lin
et al., 1998 ). However, unlike CRY1, the CRY2 photoreceptor of
Arabidopsis appears to be light labile, and levels of photoreceptor
protein in seedlings are significantly lower in broad band blue, UV-A,
and green light (in which the photoreceptor is active) than in red
light or dark (in which the photoreceptor shows no activity). To assess
the possible contribution of CRY2 protein to the cryptochrome action
spectrum, the stability of CRY2 protein was evaluated at several
wavelengths of monochromatic light throughout the range of maximum
cryptochrome effectiveness (Fig. 3).
Western-blot analysis of seedlings of Arabidopsis were performed with
anti-CRY2 antibody, and levels of CRY2 protein were compared with
levels of accumulation in dark. Surprisingly, at 400, 450, and 500 nm,
the amount of CRY2 protein did not decrease dramatically from that
found in dark-grown control seedlings. The light photon fluences used
were relatively high; at 450 nm, the intensity of 8 µmol
m 2 s 1 was sufficient to
induce more than 50% hypocotyl growth inhibition in wild-type
seedlings, for example, indicating considerable cryptochrome photoreceptor activity. These results are in contrast to the marked instability of CRY2 protein in broad band blue light (Fig. 3).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Stability of CRY2 protein under monochromatic
light conditions. Equal amounts of protein from 3-d-old seedlings grown
under the indicated light conditions were loaded onto each lane of an
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with
anti-CRY2 antibody. Light intensities used are 10 µmol
m 2 s 1 for red and blue
light under broad band conditions and 10, 8, and 25 µmol
m 2 s 1 light fluence for
400-, 450-, and 500-nm monochromatic light, respectively.
|
|
Cryptochrome Activity Is Modified by Receptor Dosage in a
Wavelength-Specific Manner
An unexpected feature of the cryptochrome action spectrum is that
CRY1-overexpressing seedlings show relatively greater activity than
wild type at wavelengths longer than about 430 nm (Figs. 1C and 2C).
There is an approximately 4-fold greater sensitivity to 400 nm in
CRY1-overexpressing seedlings as compared with wild type, whereas the
difference in sensitivity is almost 20-fold at 480 nm light. The
observed shift in peak activity to 480 nm of
cryptochrome-overexpressing seedlings (Fig. 1C) is significantly less
pronounced in norflurazon-treated seedlings (Fig. 2C), suggesting it
may have been partially resulting from the higher chlorophyll content
of such seedlings in continuous light conditions. Nevertheless, a
greater sensitivity to higher wavelength light in CRY1-overexpressing seedlings holds even in the presence of norflurazon. For instance, CRY1-overexpressing seedlings on norflurazon are about 4-fold more
sensitive than wild-type seedlings between 392 and 413 nm monochromatic
light (Fig. 2, B and C). By contrast, the difference in sensitivity is
close to 10-fold at several longer wavelengths, particularly between
472 and 491 nm.
This effect is illustrated in Figure 4A,
showing a typical experiment where seedlings of wild-type and
overexpressing lines were subjected to decreasing photon fluences of
monochromatic light at 491 and 400 nm light, respectively. Wild-type
seedlings show similar sensitivity to the initial light intensity
chosen. However, CRY1-overexpressing seedlings are considerably more
sensitive to decreasing intensities of 491 nm than of 400 nm
light.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
CRY1 dosage dependence of hypocotyl growth
inhibition. A, Relative growth inhibition of norflurazon-treated
wild-type (wt) and cryptochrome-overexpressing seedlings at decreasing
photon fluence rates of 491- and 400-nm monochromatic light,
respectively. Initial photon fluence rates (designated 100%) were
chosen that resulted in identical growth inhibition of wild-type
seedlings (7 µmol m 2
s 1 at 491 nm; 2.4 µmol
m 2 s 1 at 400 nm).
Growth of seedlings was compared at decreasing intensities of light
(60%, 33%, and 13%), and growth inhibition of CRY1-overexpressing
seedlings was compared under the two wavelengths. Overexpressing
seedlings (Oe) showed greater relative sensitivity to
491-nm than to 400-nm light. B, CRY1 cryptochrome photoreceptor
concentration in the seedlings did not change at any light treatment.
Western blots were prepared from Wt and Oe (overexpressing) seedlings
from A and compared with seedlings grown in continuous darkness. C,
Comparison of photoreceptor concentration between
cryptochrome-overproducing and wild-type seedlings. Lane 1, Wt and Oe indicates equivalent concentrations of total proteins of
wild-type and overexpressing seedlings, respectively. Lanes 0.5 and 0.2 represent a dilution of 2- and 5-fold, respectively, of plant extract
from the cryptochrome-overexpressing seedlings.
|
|
A simple explanation for the increased sensitivity to blue light in
CRY1-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines would be a proportionate increase
in the concentration of the cryptochrome photoreceptors. To test this
possibility, the levels of CRY1 and CRY2 protein were compared in
wild-type and overexpressing Arabidopsis lines by
western-blot analysis under the different growth conditions used in
Figure 4A (Fig. 4B). At none of the light intensities examined was
there any variation relative to dark levels of cryptochrome photoreceptor, either in overexpressing (Oe) or wild-type lines. Finally, a dilution series of protein extracted from
cryptochrome-overexpressing lines indicated the increase in
cryptochrome photoreceptor concentration in the CRY1-overexpressing
Arabidopsis lines was not greater than a 5-fold increase as compared
with wild type (Fig. 4C).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study we have measured hypocotyl growth inhibition in a
number of cryptochrome mutants over the wavelength range 311 to 730 nm.
To correct for possible shading artifacts by chlorophyll or carotenoids
(Beggs et al., 1980 ; Holmes and Wagner, 1982 ), the action spectra were
also performed with seedlings grown on the herbicide norflurazon, which
eliminates chlorophyll in light-grown seedlings. Based on comparisons
of wild-type, cry1cry2 double-mutant, and
CRY1-overexpressing Arabidopsis seedlings, it was determined that
maximal cryptochrome activity occurs between 380- to 500-nm bandwidth,
and that, moreover, there is no significant independent contribution by
other blue-light receptors to stem growth inhibition between 392 to 530 nm under the conditions used in this study. There was some residual
cryptochrome activity at shorter wavelengths (up to 365 nm) and also at
longer wavelengths up to 550 nm, but no cryptochrome-specific activity
in either red (660 nm) or far-red (713 nm) light, consistent with
several prior studies (Goto et al., 1993 ; Lin et al., 1996 ) and
somewhat in contrast to recent suggestions for a role for cryptochrome
in red light (Devlin and Kay, 2000 ).
In overall shape and fluence threshold, the data we present for
wild-type seedlings are in agreement with the results from prior
studies investigating hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis as a function of
wavelength, involving a comparison of wild-type with
phytochrome-deficient hy2 mutant seedlings (Goto et al., 1993 ) and to blu1, an allele of hy4 (deficient in
CRY1; Young et al., 1992 ). However, the action spectra obtained from
norflurazon-treated seedlings, though similar in shape to those of
untreated seedlings for wild type, showed significantly greater
sensitivity at all light intensities, in agreement with prior
observations for other plant species (Beggs et al., 1980 ; Holmes and
Wagner, 1982 ).
The absence of response in cry1cry2 double mutants in blue
light is important because it suggests that no other photoreceptor has
a significant direct role in blue-light-dependent hypocotyl growth
inhibition. Therefore, other photoreceptors that have been proposed to
play a direct role, in particular phytochrome A (phyA; Casal and
Mazella, 1998 ; Neff and Chory, 1998 ; Poppe et al., 1998 ) most likely
act indirectly through modification/interaction with the
cryptochrome-dependent signaling pathway. An enhancement of CRY2
function by phytochrome is demonstrated by pulse experiments, in which
red-light treatment increases CRY2-dependent growth inhibition in
Arabidopsis seedlings (Fig. 5). In
addition, possible interaction between CRY2 and phytochrome has been
documented both in vitro (Ahmad et al., 1998b ) and in vivo (Mas et al.,
2000 ). Recent studies on the role of phyA in early events of
blue-light-mediated stem growth inhibition support an indirect role for
phyA in some cryptochrome responses (Folta and Spalding,
2001b ).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Enhancement of CRY1 and CRY2 action by
phytochrome. Seedlings of the indicated genotypes (wt, wild type;
cry1cry2, double mutant of cryptochrome; OECRY1,
overexpressor of CRY1; OECRY2, overexpressor of CRY2; Ahmad et al.,
1998a ) were germinated as described in "Materials and Methods" and
then placed for 72 h under the following light conditions: BL,
0.05 µmol m 2 s 1
blue-light intensity; BL + RL, seedlings were kept at 0.05 µmol
m 2 s 1 blue-light
intensity and subjected to 10-min red light pulses once every 3 h
at a fluence of 3 µmol m 2
s 1; RL, seedlings were kept in continuous
darkness and subjected to 10-min red light pulses once every 3 h
at a fluence of 3 µmol m 2
s 1. Hypocotyl lengths of 20 seedlings per light
treatment were averaged; error bars represent the
SE.
|
|
Action spectra have traditionally been constructed as a tool for
proposing the molecular identity of the relevant photoreceptor. The
absorption spectra of putative photoreceptors is compared with the
action spectrum of the response, and the best "match" is presumed
to be the photoreceptor. There exist a number of published absorption
spectra for recombinant cryptochrome expressed in heterologous systems.
Plant cryptochrome expressed heterologously in Escherichia coli shows a pronounced peak of absorption near 420 nm as a result of the pterin chromophore (Malhotra et al., 1995 ), with the absorption spectrum trailing off rapidly to near zero by 500 nm. CRY1
photoreceptor has, in addition, been expressed in insect cell systems,
from which it has been isolated as an oxidized flavoprotein lacking a
secondary pterin chromophore (Lin et al., 1995 ). However, a difference
spectrum between insect cell extracts expressing high levels of CRY1
photoreceptor protein and control extracts (not expressing CRY1) shows
an absorption spectrum identical to the E. coli expression
product, with a major peak near 420 nm (Fig. 6A). Therefore, the lack of a secondary
chromophore in these earlier insect cell experiments may have occurred
as a result of the purification process, in which the pterin
chromophore was lost.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Absorption spectra of purified blue-light
photoreceptors. A, Absorption spectrum of CRY1 protein expressed in
baculovirus-infected Sf9 insect cells. Characteristics of absorption
spectra are as in published plant cryptochrome spectra (Malhotra et
al., 1995 ). B, Absorption spectrum of amino terminal NPL1 or PHOT-2
protein fragment expressed in E. coli. Characteristics of
absorption spectra are as in published NPH1 spectra (Christie et al.,
1998 ; Salomon et al., 2000 ).
|
|
Surprisingly, comparison of the action spectra (Figs. 1C and 2C) with
the cryptochrome absorption spectrum (Fig. 6A) shows little
correspondence. There is no pronounced peak at 420 nm in the action
spectrum, and activity at 500 nm is relatively high, particularly in
overexpressing seedlings, in comparison with the absorption spectrum.
This lack of correspondence between action spectrum and absorption
spectrum is all the more surprising because, in the case of type I
photolyases, to which plant cryptochromes show the greatest degree of
homology, action spectra for DNA photorepair are essentially
superimposable upon the absorption spectra of the purified proteins
(Jorns et al., 1986 ; Sancar et al., 1987 ). Cryptochrome may in fact be
active in a different form (perhaps using oxidized flavin, thereby
explaining the peak at 450 nm) than is photolyase, thus, raising the
intriguing possibility of a differing primary mechanism of action of
cryptochrome from photolyase.
An alternative explanation for the lack of correspondence between
absorption spectra and action spectra may be complex events downstream
of the point of photoreception, which distort the action spectra. This is particularly a possibility with action
spectra involving long periods of irradiation (HIR
spectra). To determine whether distortion might occur over the
period of total irradiation, we measured degree of growth
inhibition after a shorter (30 h) growth period for seedlings in 450 nm
light, but observed no significant distortion at least after the 1st d
of growth (not shown). Nevertheless, only a much more rapid assay
for cryptochrome function can definitively exclude the possibility of
artifact in these action spectra. It would also be preferable to
devise an assay for cryptochrome function in dark-grown seedlings,
because in this way, indirect light effects on concentrations of other
photoreceptors and/or signaling intermediates may be avoided.
A second class of plant blue-light photoreceptor for which the
absorption spectra have been determined are the plant phototropins, PHOT1 and PHOT2. This class of photoreceptor bind oxidized flavin and
have been implicated in a variety of blue-light responses including
phototropism and blue-light-dependent chloroplast movements (Briggs et
al., 2001 ). The absorption spectrum of purified recombinant PHOT1 has
been identified from both insect cell (Christie et al., 1998 ) and
E. coli (Salomon et al., 2000 ) expression systems and shows
a marked peak at 450 nm resulting from oxidized flavin. For the
purposes of this discussion, we have expressed a fragment of PHOT2
comprising the flavin-binding domains of this photoreceptor in E. coli and present the absorption spectrum below (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, the cryptochrome action spectrum is somewhat more similar to the phototropin absorption spectra than it is to that of
purified cryptochrome. The position of the peak (450 nm) and shoulders
(Figs. 1C and 2C) in wild-type seedlings corresponds more closely with
those of the phototropin absorption spectrum, although the cryptochrome
curve is much flatter. We have determined that there is a small effect
of PHOT1 on hypocotyl elongation at high-intensity broad band blue
light (M. Ahmad, unpublished data). A role for phototropin in
inhibition of hypocotyl elongation is also suggested in recent
publications investigating blue-light-dependent activation of ion
channels (Folta and Spalding, 2001a ). However, given that
cry1cry2 double mutants show no growth inhibition at the
conditions used in the present work, any contribution by such PAS-domain-containing photoreceptors to the action spectrum is likely
to be indirect and/or minor.
Evidence of wavelength-specific effects on the cryptochrome
photoreceptors is found in the differential stability of CRY2 protein.
Under broad band blue-light conditions, CRY2 protein is rapidly
degraded and accumulates to only very low concentrations in seedlings.
This may be due to targeting by degradative enzymes upon activation of
the photoreceptor, by analogy to the situation with phyA. However,
under the narrow band light conditions used in these action spectra,
CRY2 protein appears to be more stable and accumulates even at
relatively high blue-light intensities. It is possible that
cryptochromes may cycle between multiple conformations upon activation
by light and that only one of these forms is recognized by protein
degradative enzymes. It will be intriguing to examine whether
combinations of monochromatic light of different wavelengths reduce the
stability of CRY2 protein and whether the conformation of CRY2
photoreceptor under monochromatic light conditions differs from that
under broad band blue light.
The action spectra of CRY1-overexpressing seedlings show an unexpected
feature in that the responsivity varies between a 4-fold to a more than
10-fold increase compared with wild type, even though the increase in
photoreceptor concentration is not more than 5-fold at any wavelength.
In particular, there is greater responsivity of
cryptochrome-overexpressing seedlings above 430 nm in comparison with
wild-type seedlings of both untreated and norflurazon-treated plant
material. A similar shift to longer wavelengths in the action spectrum
has been observed for transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings overexpressing
phytochrome (McCormac et al., 1993 ; Shinomura et al., 1998 ) and was
explained in terms of wavelength dependent differences in the absolute
amounts of Pfr generated in overexpressing lines (Shinomura et al.,
1998 ). It is intriguing to speculate that dosage dependence in
cryptochrome photoreceptor mutants may also reflect differential
accumulation and/or lifetime of multiple interchangeable receptor conformations.
In summary, we present here an action spectrum for a response
demonstrated to be under the control of cryptochrome under the fluence
range investigated. The action spectrum shows several unexpected
features, in particular a lack of correspondence with the absorption
spectrum of the purified cryptochrome photoreceptor from several
heterologous systems. This may indicate some difference in the
biochemical mode of action between cryptochromes and photolyases, where
absorption spectra and action spectra coincide closely. Furthermore,
examination of cryptochrome responses in CRY1-overexpressing seedlings
shows a complex dosage dependence at different wavelengths, suggesting
a complex mechanism of activation. Finally, the stability of CRY2
photoreceptor is affected differentially by broad band and
monochromatic light, further suggesting complex events within the
photoreceptor at the point of absorption of the light signal. It will
be of great interest to sort out the molecular basis of this intriguing
physiology, both by biophysical investigation of the purified
photoreceptor and by detailed examination of cryptochrome interactions
with potential substrates as a function of wavelength.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Arabidopsis Seedling Germination and Growth
For all light irradiation experiments Arabidopsis seeds were
surface sterilized by a brief wash in 100% (v/v) ethanol,
followed by air drying under a laminar flow hood. Seeds were sown on
one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog salts medium (Sigma, St.
Louis) on petri plates containing 2% (w/v) Suc and 0.8% (w/v)
agar. Norflurazon was added at a final concentration of 5 × 10 6 M and was a kind gift of Dr. Klaus Kreuz (Novartis,
Basel). Plates were stored for 2 d at 4°C to break dormancy, and
were subsequently transferred to white light (30 µmol
m 2 s 1) for 24 h to induce germination.
Hy4-2.23N and fha alleles were used for
CRY1 and CRY2 mutations, respectively; CRY1- and CRY2-overexpressing seedlings were as described (Ahmad et al., 1998a ).
Interference Filters and Light Sources
Monochromatic light was produced by slide projectors (Prado
Universal 31047, Ernst Leitz GmBH, Wetzler, Germany) in combination with 5-mm KGI heat-absorbing filters (Schott Glaswerke, Mainz, Germany)
placed before interference filters of 8- to 10-nm half-bandwidth (Schott Glaswerke, Mainz, Germany). Broad band light was produced by
using cool-white fluorescent bulbs (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) in association with broad band plexiglass filters of
100-nm bandwidth as used in prior studies (Ahmad et al.,
1998a ).
Inhibition of Hypocotyl Elongation Assays
Approximately 50 seeds of wild-type,
cryptochrome-overexpressing, and cryptochrome-deficient Arabidopsis
lines were plated within a single petri dish for each light treatment.
In this way, hypocotyl growth of seedlings is directly comparable and
did not suffer from possible inconsistencies in light treatments or
experimental manipulation between plates. Seedlings were plated an
average of 1 to 2 mm apart to minimize self-shading through the course of the light irradiations. Plates were stacked in columns under light
sources, and irradiated from above, such that the light intensity at
subsequent positions in the stack were reduced by a defined amount.
Beams of light from slide projectors were shone through interference
filters by objectives that penetrated the wall at each position.
Irradiations were performed for a continuous 60 h after the 24-h
white-light treatment to induce germination of seedlings (see above).
For each experiment, a number of plates were wrapped in foil and
maintained for 60 h as dark controls. Light intensities at the
surface of the petri plates were measured for each plate in a stack
after the completion of the experiment. In all instances, dark controls
showed no evidence of differential growth between the different
genotypes, indicating that this growth regime does not activate the
cryptochrome photoreceptors in the absence of light. Subsequent to
termination of the light treatments, samples for determination of
protein concentrations were taken immediately. Additional plates of
seedlings were stored at 4°C for a period not greater than 8 h,
during which time from 10 to 20 seedlings were measured per plate per
Arabidopsis line. Error bars represent the SE; in general,
growth was very uniform, and variation within a population was not more
than 10% of total seedling length. Light treatments under broad band
filters were carried out under light conditions (filters and
fluorescent bulbs) as described previously (Ahmad et al.,
1998a ).
Western-Blot Analysis
Western-blot analysis of seedlings was performed using anti-CRY1
and anti-CRY2 antibodies prepared to the C terminus of the respective
proteins expressed in recombinant form, essentially as described
previously (Ahmad et al., 1998a ). All seedlings used for western-blot
analysis were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen subsequent to light
treatments. Samples were then ground in SDS sample buffer (Laemmli) and
equivalent amounts of protein run on each lane of an SDS polyacrylamide
gel, before western transfer and detection by antisera.
Absorption Spectra of Recombinant Photoreceptors
Cryptochrome-1 protein was expressed in insect cell (Sf9) system
as described previously (Lin et al., 1995 ). Insect cell cultures expressing recombinant cryptochrome were precipitated and lysed as
described (Lin et al., 1995 ) in parallel with an equal amount of
uninfected Sf9 cells. The cell suspensions were clarified by ultracentrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 1 h, and the supernatants were adjusted to an equivalent total protein concentration (1 mg
mL 1). The absorption spectrum of the extract from both
cryptochrome-expressing and control cells was taken in a DU7400
spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). Insect cell
control cultures not expressing recombinant cryptochrome showed no
measurable absorption at the concentration used in visible (380-800
nm) light. The absorption spectrum of cryptochrome was assessed as the
difference spectra between extracts from cryptochrome-expressing and
uninduced cell cultures, similarly to the determination of recombinant
PHOT1 absorption spectra from insect cell culture (Christie et al., 1998 ).
An N-terminal fragment of PHOT2 photoreceptor comprising a
flavin-binding or LOV domain (amino acids 1-900) was expressed in
Escherichia coli using the PET21 vector expression
system (Novagen, Madison, WI). Recombinant truncated NPL1 protein was
purified via an HIS affinity tag on a nickel affinity column by methods recommended by the manufacturer. The purified recombinant protein was
eluted, and the absorption spectrum taken in a Beckman Coulter DU7400
spectrophotometer. The spectrum is identical to published spectra
(Salomon et al., 2000 ).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Alfred Batschauer for use of action spectroscopy
facilities and critical reading of the manuscript; Jean-Pierre Bouly for critical reading of the manuscript; and Emile Miginiac,
Jean-Claude Kader, and the members of the plant science laboratory at
the University of Paris for their assistance and support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received October 23, 2001; returned for revision December 26, 2001; accepted March 12, 2002.
1
This work was supported by a Contrat Atipe
Blanche from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (to
M.A.).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail ahmad{at}ccr.jussieu.fr; fax 133144272916.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.010969.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Ahmad M
(1999)
Seeing the world in red and blue: insight into plant vision and photoreceptors.
Curr Opin Plant Biol
2: 230-235[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Ahmad M, Cashmore AR
(1996)
Seeing blue: the discovery of cryptochrome.
Plant Mol Biol
30: 851-861[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Ahmad M, Cashmore AR
(1997)
The blue-light receptor cryptochrome 1 shows functional dependence on phytochrome A or phytochrome B in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
11: 421-427[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Ahmad M, Jarillo JA, Cashmore AR
(1998a)
Chimeric proteins between cry1 and cry2 Arabidopsis blue light photoreceptors indicate overlapping functions and varying protein stability.
Plant Cell
10: 197-208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ahmad M, Jarillo J, Smirnova O, Cashmore AR
(1998b)
The CRY1 blue light photoreceptor of Arabidopsis interacts with phytochrome A in vitro.
Mol Cells
1: 939-948
-
Ahmad M, Lin C, Cashmore AR
(1995)
Mutations throughout an Arabidopsis blue-light photoreceptor impair blue-light-responsive anthocyanin accumulation and inhibition of hypocotyl elongation.
Plant J
8: 653-658[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Beggs CJ, Holmes MG, Jabben M, Schafer E
(1980)
Action spectra for the inhibition of hypocotyl growth by continuous irradiation in light and dark-grown Sinapis alba L. seedlings.
Plant Physiol
66: 615-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Briggs W, Huala E
(1999)
Blue-light photoreceptors in higher plants.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
15: 33-62[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Briggs WR, Beck CF, Cashmore AR, Christie JM, Hughes J, Jarillo JA, Kagawa T, Kanegae H, Liscum E, Nagatani A, et al
(2001)
The phototropin family of photoreceptors.
Plant Cell
13: 993-997[Free Full Text]
-
Casal JJ, Mazella MA
(1998)
Conditional synergism between cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B is shown by the analysis of phyA, phyB, and hy4 simple, double, and triple mutants in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol
118: 19-25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Christie JM, Reymond P, Powell GK, Bernasconi P, Raibekas AA, Liscum E, Briggs W
(1998)
Arabidopsis NPH1: a flavoprotein with the properties of a photoreceptor for phototropism.
Science
282: 1698-1701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Deisenhofer J
(2000)
DNA photolyases and cryptochromes.
Mutat Res
460: 143-149[Medline]
-
Devlin PF, Kay SA
(2000)
Cryptochromes are required for phytochrome signaling to the circadian clock but not for rhythmicity.
Plant Cell
12: 2499-2510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Folta KM, Spalding EP
(2001a)
Unexpected roles for cryptochrome 2 and phototropin revealed by high-resolution analysis of blue light-mediated hypocotyl growth inhibition.
Plant J
26: 471-478[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Folta KM, Spalding EP
(2001b)
Opposing roles of phytochrome A and phytochrome B in early cryptochrome-mediated growth inhibition.
Plant J
28: 333-340[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Goto N, Yamamoto K, Watanabe M
(1993)
Action spectra for inhibition of hypocotyl growth of wild-type plants and of the hy2 long-hypocotyl mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Photochem Photobiol
57: 867-871
-
Holmes MG, Wagner E
(1982)
The influence of chlorophyll on the spectral control of elongation growth in Chenopodium rubrum L. hypocotyls.
Plant Cell Physiol
23: 745-750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jorns MS, Baldwin ET, Sancar GB, Sancar A
(1986)
Action mechanism of Escherischia coli DNA photolyase.
J Biol Chem
262: 486-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin C
(2000)
Plant blue-light receptors.
Trends Plant Sci
5: 337-342[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Lin C, Ahmad M, Cashmore AR
(1996)
Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 is a soluble protein mediating blue light-dependent regulation of plant growth and development.
Plant J
10: 893-902[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Lin C, Robertson DE, Ahmad M, Raibekas AA, Jorns MS, Dutton PL, Cashmore AR
(1995)
Association of flavin adenine dinucleotide with the Arabidopsis blue light receptor CRY1.
Science
269: 968-970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin C, Yang H, Guo H, Mockler T, Chen J, Cashmore AR
(1998)
Enhancement of blue-light sensitivity of Arabidopsis seedlings by a blue-light receptor cryptochrome 2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95: 7686-7690
-
Lin FJ, Song W, Meyer-Bernstein E, Naidoo N, Sehgal A
(2001)
Photic signaling by cryptochrome in the Drosophila circadian system.
Mol Cell Biol
21: 7287-7294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Malhotra K, Sang-Tae K, Batschauer A, Dawut L, Sancar A
(1995)
Putative blue-light photoreceptors from Arabidopsis thaliana and Sinapis alba with a high degree of sequence homology to DNA photolyase contain the two photolyase cofactors but lack DNA repair activity.
Biochemistry
34: 6892-6899[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Mas P, Devlin PF, Panda S, Kay SA
(2000)
Functional interaction of phytochrome B and cryptochrome 2.
Nature
408: 207-211[CrossRef][Medline]
-
McCormac AC, Wagner D, Boylan MT, Quail PH, Smith H, Whitelam GC
(1993)
Photoresponses of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings expressing introduced phytochrome B-encoding cDNA: evidence that phytochrome A and phytochrome B have distinct photoregulatory functions.
Plant J
4: 19-27[CrossRef][Web of Science]
-
Neff MM, Chory J
(1998)
Genetic interactions between phytochrome A, phytochrome B, and cryptochrome 1 during Arabidopsis development.
Plant Physiol
118: 27-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Poppe C, Sweere U, Drumm-Herrel H, Schafer E
(1998)
The blue-light receptor cryptochrome 1 can act independently of phytochrome A and B in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
16: 465-471[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Salomon M, Christie JM, Knieb E, Lempert U, Briggs WR
(2000)
Photochemical and mutational analysis of the FMN-binding domains of the plant blue light receptor, phototropin.
Biochemistry
39: 9401-9410[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Sancar A
(2000)
CRYPTOCHROME: the second photoactive pigment in the eye and its role in circadian photoreception.
Annu Rev Biochem
69: 31-67[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Sancar GB, Jorns MS, Payne G, Fluke DJ, Rupert CS, Sancar A
(1987)
Action mechanism of Escherischia coli DNA photolyase.
J Biol Chem
262: 492-498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shinomura T, Hanzawa H, Schafer E, Furuya M
(1998)
Mode of phytochrome B action in the photoregulation of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant J
13: 583-590[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Shinomura T, Nagatani A, Hanzawa H, Kubota M, Watanabe M, Furuya M
(1996)
Action spectrum for phytochrome-A and B-specific photoinduction of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93: 8129-8133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shinomura T, Uchida K, Furuya M
(2000)
Elementary processes of photoperception by phytochrome A for high-irradiance response of hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol
122: 147-156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yang HQ, Wu YJ, Tang RH, Liu D, Liu Y, Cashmore AR
(2000)
The C termini of Arabidopsis cryptochromes mediate a constitutive light response.
Cell
103: 815-827[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Young J, Liscum E, Hangarter RJ
(1992)
Spectral-dependence of light-inhibited hypocotyl elongation in photomorphogenic mutants of Arabidopsis: evidence for a UV-A photosensor.
Planta
188: 106-114[CrossRef][Web of Science]
© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hoang, J.-P. Bouly, and M. Ahmad
Evidence of a Light-Sensing Role for Folate in Arabidopsis Cryptochrome Blue-Light Receptors
Mol Plant,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
68 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Yang, Z.-C. Zuo, X.-Y. Zhao, X. Li, J. Klejnot, Y. Li, P. Chen, S.-P. Liang, X.-H. Yu, X.-M. Liu, et al.
Blue-Light-Independent Activity of Arabidopsis Cryptochromes in the Regulation of Steady-State Levels of Protein and mRNA Expression
Mol Plant,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
167 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Vandenbussche, B. Vancompernolle, I. Rieu, M. Ahmad, A. Phillips, T. Moritz, P. Hedden, and D. Van Der Straeten
Ethylene-induced Arabidopsis hypocotyl elongation is dependent on but not mediated by gibberellins
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 1, 2007;
58(15-16):
4269 - 4281.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Folta and S. A. Maruhnich
Green light: a signal to slow down or stop
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2007;
58(12):
3099 - 3111.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Song, N. Ozturk, T. R. Denaro, N. O. Arat, Y.-T. Kao, H. Zhu, D. Zhong, S. M. Reppert, and A. Sancar
Formation and Function of Flavin Anion Radical in Cryptochrome 1 Blue-Light Photoreceptor of Monarch Butterfly
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 15, 2007;
282(24):
17608 - 17612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Banerjee, E. Schleicher, S. Meier, R. M. Viana, R. Pokorny, M. Ahmad, R. Bittl, and A. Batschauer
The Signaling State of Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 2 Contains Flavin Semiquinone
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2007;
282(20):
14916 - 14922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Berndt, T. Kottke, H. Breitkreuz, R. Dvorsky, S. Hennig, M. Alexander, and E. Wolf
A Novel Photoreaction Mechanism for the Circadian Blue Light Photoreceptor Drosophila Cryptochrome
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 27, 2007;
282(17):
13011 - 13021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. VanVickle-Chavez and R. N. Van Gelder
Action Spectrum of Drosophila Cryptochrome
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 6, 2007;
282(14):
10561 - 10566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Bouly, E. Schleicher, M. Dionisio-Sese, F. Vandenbussche, D. Van Der Straeten, N. Bakrim, S. Meier, A. Batschauer, P. Galland, R. Bittl, et al.
Cryptochrome Blue Light Photoreceptors Are Activated through Interconversion of Flavin Redox States
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
9383 - 9391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ozturk, S.-H. Song, S. Ozgur, C. P. Selby, L. Morrison, C. Partch, D. Zhong, and A. Sancar
Structure and Function of Animal Cryptochromes
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
January 1, 2007;
72(0):
119 - 131.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Christophe, B. Moulia, and C. Varlet-Grancher
Quantitative contributions of blue light and PAR to the photocontrol of plant morphogenesis in Trifolium repens (L.)
J. Exp. Bot.,
July 1, 2006;
57(10):
2379 - 2390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Tucker, M. Lee, S. Alli, V. Sookhdeo, M. Wada, T. Imaizumi, M. Kasahara, and P. K. Hepler
UV-A Induces Two Calcium Waves in Physcomitrella patens
Plant Cell Physiol.,
August 1, 2005;
46(8):
1226 - 1236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zeugner, M. Byrdin, J.-P. Bouly, N. Bakrim, B. Giovani, K. Brettel, and M. Ahmad
Light-induced Electron Transfer in Arabidopsis Cryptochrome-1 Correlates with in Vivo Function
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 20, 2005;
280(20):
19437 - 19440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Folta
Green Light Stimulates Early Stem Elongation, Antagonizing Light-Mediated Growth Inhibition
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2004;
135(3):
1407 - 1416.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Klarsfeld, S. Malpel, C. Michard-Vanhee, M. Picot, E. Chelot, and F. Rouyer
Novel Features of Cryptochrome-Mediated Photoreception in the Brain Circadian Clock of Drosophila
J. Neurosci.,
February 11, 2004;
24(6):
1468 - 1477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Whippo and R. P. Hangarter
Second Positive Phototropism Results from Coordinated Co-Action of the Phototropins and Cryptochromes
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2003;
132(3):
1499 - 1507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|