|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 8, 2002; 10.1104/pp.004226 Plant Physiol, September 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 303-311 Sterol C-24 Methyltransferase Type 1 Controls the Flux of Carbon into Sterol Biosynthesis in Tobacco SeedPlant Sciences, Colworth House, Unilever Research and Development Laboratory, Sharnbrook, Bedford MK44 1LQ, United Kingdom
The first committed step in the conversion of cycloartenol
into
Sterols are ubiquitous in plant
cells, where they serve crucial functions to control the fluidity and
permeability of membranes and as precursors to steroid growth
regulators such as brassinosteroids (Ikekawa, 1990
The conversion of cycloartenol into 24-methylene cycloartenol is
principally catalyzed by an
S-adenosyl-L-Met-dependent
sterol C-24 methyltransferase type 1 (SMT1). Genes encoding SMT1 enzyme have been cloned from yeast (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae) and a range of plants such as Arabidopsis, tobacco,
Ricinus communis, soybean (Glycine max), and
Oryza sativa (Schaeffer et al., 2000 To date, all effort has been devoted to elucidate the function of SMT1
in vegetative plant tissues in relation to sterol composition and plant
development (Deiner at al., 2000
Overexpression of SMT1 in Tobacco The Ntsmt1-1 gene, encoding SMT1, was cloned from a
pool of tobacco cDNAs as described in "Materials and Methods."
Plant expression vectors were constructed by placing
Ntsmt1-1 under control of either the constitutive carnation
etched ring virus (CERV; pNH7) or the seed-specific truncated
acyl-carrier protein (ACP) promoter (pNH19; Fig.
2). The CERV promoter has similar
strength and developmental regulation pattern as the more commonly used
enhanced cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (M. Harker, N. Holmberg, J.C. Clayton, C.L. Gibbard, A.D. Wallace, S. Rawlins, S.A.
Hellyer, A. Lanot, and R. Safford, unpublished data). The ACP
promoter is active during the second and third stages of rape seed
development, when sterol biosynthesis occurs (DeSilva et al., 1990
Binary vectors pNH7 (CERV-Ntsmt1-1-NOS) and pNH19 (ACPp-Ntsmt1-1-NOS), and the empty vector control, pSJ35, were transformed into tobacco. Thirty individually transformed NH7 and NH19 lines were generated and screened for SMT1 activity in leaf and seed tissue. As demonstrated in Figure 3, A and B, transgenic NH7 lines exhibited up to 4.3-fold more SMT1 activity in leaf and up to 7.4-fold more activity in seed tissue than the average of control plants. Although the overall trend of increased activity in the population of leaf samples was mirrored in the seed samples, there was only a loose correlation between the SMT1 activity in leaf and seed tissue. The transgenic NH19 lines also demonstrated significant increases in SMT1 activity in seed tissue (Fig. 3C). Plants NH19:13 and NH19:27 exhibited up to 3.5-fold more SMT1 activity than the average of control plants. Seeds of selected high-expressing plants were germinated on hygromycin and grown on to the subsequent generation (T1).
Genetic Characterization of SMT1-Expressing Lines Transgenic NH7 and NH19 lines in the T0
generation, which exhibited high SMT1 activity, were subjected to
Southern-blot analysis to deduce the number of transgene integration
loci because previous reports have indicated that multiple copies may
lead to cosuppression (Hobbs et al., 1990
Segregation of the transgene in T1 lines NH7:27
and NH19:27 was assessed by germinating 25 seeds on
hygromycin-containing media. NH7:27 and NH19:27 exhibited Mendelian
segregation ratios of 3:1 ( Enhanced Carbon Flux into End Product Sterols in Seed But Not in Leaf Tissue The sterol level and composition of leaf tissue from five
individual T1 NH7 lines was analyzed (Table
II). In agreement with Schaeffer et al.
(2000)
The sterol composition of SMT1-overexpressing leaf tissue, however, was
altered, with cycloartenol and cholesterol levels dramatically reduced
(Table II). The level of cycloartenol was reduced from approximately 50 µg g In contrast to leaf, seed of transgenic tobacco overexpressing SMT1,
under control of either the CERV or ACP promoter, exhibited elevated
total sterol levels (Tables III and IV). The total sterol level was
27% and 44% higher in the NH7:27 and NH19:27 T1
lines, respectively. Interestingly, the relative decrease of
cycloartenol (percent of wild type level) was less dramatic in the seed
tissue than in the leaf tissue of the NH7 lines (Tables II and III).
However, it should be pointed out that the absolute amount of
cycloartenol was higher in wild-type seed than leaf (approximately 300 versus approximately 50 µg g
The end product sterols, isofucosterol, campesterol, and sitosterol, were all significantly increased in the seeds of NH7:27 and NH19:27 tobacco (Tables III and IV), but levels of stigmasterol were unaltered in seed as well as leaf tissue (Tables II-IV). The latter finding is easy to explain in leaf tissue because the level of the immediate precursor of stigmasterol, sitosterol, is unaltered. However, the sitosterol level in seed tissue was increased by 30% to 50%, without impacting on the level of stigmasterol, suggesting that the C-22 desaturase that catalyzes the conversion of sitosterol into stigmasterol is a critical slow step in seed tissue (Tables III and IV; M. Harker, N. Holmberg, J.C. Clayton, C.L. Gibbard, A.D. Wallace, S. Rawlins, S.A. Hellyer, A. Lanot, and R. Safford, unpublished data). The increased levels of end product sterols cannot simply be explained
by the conversion of cycloartenol into the concomitant alkylated
sterols because cycloartenol is only a minor intermediate (approximately 8% of total sterols in seed). An alternative
explanation is that the decreased levels of cycloartenol and/or
cholesterol levels feed back to enzymes upstream of SMT1, up-regulating
enzyme activities and enhancing carbon flux into the sterol
biosynthetic pathway. One potential target enzyme is HMGR, which has
been shown to control the flux of carbon into sterol biosynthesis
(Chappell et al., 1995 Increased Endogenous HMGR Activity in Seed with Reduced Levels of Cycloartenol HMGR activity and transcript levels were measured in seed tissue of two high T1 sterol lines (NH7:27 and NH19:27). As shown in Figure 4A, lines NH7:27 and NH19:27 have elevated HMGR activity, up to 2.7- and 3.6-fold, respectively. Moreover, these lines exhibit not only elevated Ntsmt1-1 transcript levels, which are due to the transgene expression, but also elevated levels of endogenous hmgr transcripts (Fig. 4B). The relative differences in the increases of hmgr and Ntsmt1-1 transcript levels between the NH7:27 and NH19:27 lines are most likely due to differences in the promoter strength and temporal expression patterns of the CERV and ACP promoters (Fig. 4B).
The most obvious conclusion from these experiments is that the overexpression of SMT1 reduces the level of cycloartenol, which in turn feeds back to up-regulate the activity of HMGR. The elevated transcript levels suggest that up-regulation of HMGR activity occurs via transcriptional control, but it cannot be excluded that HMGR is regulated on other levels as well. Concluding Remarks It has been shown in several studies that the activity of HMGR is
important in regulating the carbon flux from acetate to sterols (e.g.
Chappell et al., 1995 We have demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge, that overexpression of SMT1 leads to an increase in sterol accumulation in seed, while also confirming the lack of effect on sterol levels in leaf tissue. Hence, we conclude that the carbon fluxes into the sterol pathways in leaf and seed tissue are regulated via different mechanisms. Although overexpressing SMT1 in seed only gave rise to modest absolute decreases in cycloartenol levels, greater significant increases in total sterol levels were observed (Tables III and IV). Furthermore, we also detected increases in endogenous HMGR activity in the SMT1-overexpressing tobacco (Fig. 4). Therefore, we hypothesize that lowering the level of the key intermediate, cycloartenol, feeds back and up-regulates HMGR activity to increase the carbon flux to cycloartenol. However, it cannot be ruled out that lowering the cholesterol level also affects HMGR activity. Furthermore, the elevated hmgr transcript levels suggest that transcriptional regulation is involved. The question of why sterol biosynthesis is regulated via different
mechanisms in seed and leaf tissues remains unanswered. However, it has
been shown that germinating seed lacks an active de novo sterol
pathway, but important changes in sterol composition still occur during
germination and seedling development (Fang and Baisted, 1975
Strains, Plasmids, Media, and Culture Conditions Escherichia coli strain DH5 Plant Material Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cv SR1 Petite Havana
was grown in either Murashige and Skoog medium or a compost:perlite
mixture (2:1 [v/v]; Murashige and Skoog, 1962 Oligonucleotide Synthesis All oligonucleotides were synthesized by MWG (Milton Keynes, UK) and they are compiled in Table V.
Cloning of Ntsmt1-1 Two-week-old seedlings of tobacco cv SR1 Petit Havana were
ground up in a mortar and the total RNA was isolated using the Purescript RNA isolation kit from Flowgen (Shenstone, UK). Total RNA (5 µg) was mixed with primer RoRidT17 (10 pmol) in 11.34 µL of
diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. The mixture was incubated at 68°C for 4 min and thereafter placed in wet ice for 2 min. First
strand buffer (1×), dithiothreitol (0.1 µmol), RNAsin (22 units), dNTP (20 nmol), and Superscript (200 units) were added to give
a final volume of 20 µL. The mix was incubated at 37°C for 60 min.
The Ntsmt1-1 cDNA (accession no. U81312) was amplified by gene-specific primers Ntsmt15 and Ntsmt13 using 35 thermal cycles
(30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 53°C, and 90 s at 72°C) and a
mix of Taq and Pyrococcus furiosus
(10% [v/v]) DNA polymerase. The amplification products were
separated on a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel and the fragment corresponding
to the full-length Ntsmt1-1 cDNA was excised and ligated
into pGEM-T. Plasmid pGEM-T plasmid harboring the
Ntsmt1-1 gene was sequenced using an automatic 373 sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the following primers: pUC/M13 forward, pUC/M13 reverse, Seqsmt5, and
Seqsmt3. Sequencing demonstrated that the cloned gene contained two
base substitutions (T553 to G and G555 to T) as compared with the
published Ntsmt1-1 sequence (Bouvier-Navé et al.,
1998 Construction of Shuttle Vectors The 308-bp
HindIII/BamHI-digested CERV promoter
fragment from pSJ103 and the
SacI/EcoRI-digested 275-bp NOS from pSJ35
was inserted into pUC19, giving pUCN. A synthetic DNA linker, assembled by annealing oligonucleotides PCR628 and PCR629, was inserted into the
BamHI/SacI-digested pUCV, yielding pUCV2.
This linker introduces the following restriction enzyme sites (5' to
3'): NcoI, NheI, and MunI.
Another DNA linker was assembled thereafter by annealing PCR645 and
PCR646. The sequence of this linker was designed to mimic the consensus
Kozak sequence from plants (taa acc ATG G), which
has been shown to render efficient translation (Joshi et al., 1997 Cloning of Promoters The CERV promoter was isolated by PCR from infected
Dianthus barbatus leaf material using the primers CERV1
and CERV2 under standard conditions. The approximately 380-bp fragment
(corresponding to nucleotides 6,737-7,118 of Hull et al., 1986 A truncated 289-bp portion of the ACP promoter and 69 bp of the
5'-untranslated region of the ACP5 gene were amplified
from vector pTZ5BS (DeSilva et al., 1990 Construction of Ntsmt1-1 Expression Vectors The 1,040-bp Ntsmt1-1 gene was amplified from plasmid pGEM-T, harboring Ntsmt1-1, by PCR using standard conditions. To facilitate cloning, the primers used, clsmt5 and clsmt3, were designed with 5' overhangs containing AflIII and EcoRI restriction sites, respectively. A mix of Taq and Pyrococcus furiosus (10% [v/v]) DNA polymerase was used to ensure high amplification fidelity during the amplification. The amplification products were separated on a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel and the 1,040-bp Ntsmt1-1 gene was excised, purified, digested by AflIII and EcoRI, and inserted into vector pNH3 downstream of the CERV promoter and upstream of the NOS terminator giving pNH6. Plasmid pNH6 was sequenced with primers CERV1S, clsmt5, seqsmt5, seqsmt3, clsmt3, and NosAs to confirm its authenticity. The CERV-Ntsmt1-1-NOS cassette was excised from pNH6 using XmaI and EcoRI and subsequently inserted into XmaI/EcoRI-digested pSJ35, giving pNH7 (Fig. 1). Vector pNH7 was sequenced using primers CERV1S and NosAs to confirm that the junction between promoter, Ntsmt1-1, and terminator were intact. The AflIII/EcoRI-digested Ntsmt1-1 amplification product was inserted into NcoI/MunI-digested pNH12, rendering pNH14. Plasmid pNH14 was sequenced with primers 181, clsmt5, seqsmt5, seqsmt3, and NosAs to confirm that the PCR amplification had not introduced any mutations. Vector pNH14 was digested by XmaI and EcoRI to excise the ACPp-Ntsmt1-1-NOS expression cassette. This cassette was subsequently inserted into XmaI/EcoRI-digested pSJ35, resulting in binary expression vector pNH19 (Fig. 1). Vector pNH19 was sequenced with primers ACP5, Ntsmt15, and NosAs to confirm that the junction regions between promoter, gene, and terminator were intact. Plant Transformation and Growth Conditions Binary vectors pNH7, pNH19, and pSJ35 were transformed into
Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 using electroporation
as described by Shen and Forde (1989) Southern-Blot Analysis Genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue of 4-week-old
soil-grown primary transgenics using the cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide method as described by Rogers and Bendich (1985) SMT1 Activity Assay All steps were carried out at 4°C unless otherwise stated.
Approximately 150 mg of tagged seeds (collected 17 d after
anthesis), which had been stored previously at Crude extracts of young developing tobacco leaves were homogenized 1:10 in homogenization buffer (same as above) using an Ultra-turrax at maximum speed. After centrifugation for 5 min at 1,200g, the resulting supernatant was immediately assayed for SMT1 activity. The standard assay system consisted of 50 µM
S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-14C] Met
(57 mCi mmol HMGR Activity Assay All steps were carried out at 4°C unless otherwise stated.
Homogenization buffer was 0.2 M potassium phosphate, pH
7.5, containing 0.4 M Suc, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glutathione, and 4 g/100 µL insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone. Developing seeds from tagged pods (approximately 150 mg), collected 14 d after anthesis, were homogenized in the ratio 1:10 (w/v) seed:buffer using an Ultra-turrax at maximum speed. After centrifugation for 5 min at
1,200g, the lipid and pellet fractions were extracted
together with 400 µL of homogenization buffer containing 2% (w/v)
Brij. The samples were vortexed and incubated on ice for 20 min. The
samples were again centrifuged at 1,200g for 5 min at
4°C. This process was immediately repeated. The two detergent
extracts were mixed 1:1 (v/v) and assayed for HMGR enzyme activity. The
assay system consisted of 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH
7.5; 3 mM NADPH; 20 µM [14C]
HMG CoA (30 nCi); and 20 µL of enzyme extract in a final volume of 26 µL. In control assays, the enzyme extract was omitted. After incubation for 15 min at 30°C, reactions were terminated by the addition of 5 µL of 6 M HCl. To this mixture, 5 µL of
mevalonate lactone (1 mg µL Real-Time PCR Total RNA was isolated from developing tobacco seed (14 d after anthesis) of NH7:27, NH19:27, and SR1 plants using the RNaqueous kit according to the supplier's instructions (Ambion, Austin, TX). The total RNA was treated with DNase to remove any contamination of genomic DNA and subsequently converted into cDNA using the 3' RACE System from Invitrogen. Taqman primer pairs directed against Ntsmt1-1 (TaqN1 and TaqN2), tobacco tac9 actin (TaqA1 and TaqA2), and tobacco hmgr (TaqNtH1 and TaqNtH2) genes were designed using the Primer Express software (PE-Applied Biosystems). These primer pairs were used together with Sybr Green (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in Taqman PCR reactions to detect transcript levels of Ntsmt1-1, hmgr, and tac9 in transgenic and control samples. The Ntsmt1-1 and hmgr transcript levels in the transgenic tobacco were calculated in relation to the transcript levels in SR1 tobacco according to the manual supplied by PE-Applied Biosystems. Sterol Analysis Mature seed and leaf tissue was collected and freeze dried. Freeze-dried tissue (approximately 50 mg) was ground with a pestle and mortar. Dihydrocholesterol (250 µL, 0.2% [w/v]) in chloroform was added to act as the internal standard. Sterols were extracted in 5 mL of 2:1 (v/v) chloroform:methanol for 30 min at 80°C. The mixture was allowed to cool and then filtered. The extract was reduced to dryness under nitrogen. Transmethylation of the extract was performed by resuspending the extracts in 1 mL of toluene and 2 mL of sodium methoxide (0.5 M). The mixture was maintained at 80°C for 30 min and allowed to cool. Boron trifluoride solution (2 mL, 14% [w/v]) was added and the mixture was heated for a further 10 min at 80°C. Diethyl ether (3 mL) was added to the mixture when cool, followed by deionized water (5 mL) with vigorous shaking. The ether layer was removed and a second extraction with ether performed. The ether layers were combined and backwashed with 5 mL of water. The ether phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate overnight. Extracts were resuspended in 300 µL of toluene and the free sterols
silylated by the addition of 150 µL of 95:5 (v/v)
N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide:trimethylchlorosilane followed by incubation at 50°C for 10 min. Sterol derivatives were
analyzed by gas chromatography using a Perkin-Elmer Autosystem XL GC
with flame ionization detection and a BPX5 capillary column (25-m × 0.32-mm i.d., 0.25-µm film thickness, and helium 8 pounds per
square inch), ex SGE. The temperature program used a fast rise
from 80°C to 230°C (45°C min
We thank Ann Scarborough, Rachel Payne, and Bernadette Marsh for skillful sequencing assistance.
Received March 5, 2002; returned for revision April 4, 2002; accepted April 24, 2002. * Corresponding author; e-mail niklas.holmberg{at}alligatorbio-science.com; fax 46-2864290.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.004226.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|