Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.

Plant Physiol, September 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 4-5

NEWS FROM THE ARCHIVES



    Do Plants Have Ouabain (OU)-Sensitive ATPases?
TOP
Do Plants Have Ouabain...
Origins of OU Sensitivity
Physiological Effects of OU
Two OU-Sensitive ATPases?
LITERATURE CITED

In the 1960s and 1970s, many plant physiologists labored under the assumption that any electrogenic ion pumps discovered in plant cells would be similar, if not identical, to the electrogenic Na+, K+-ATPase found in the plasma membrane of animal cells. These expectations eventually subsided as evidence, now incontrovertible, mounted that electrogenesis in plants involves primarily OU-insensitive H+-ATPases. Before this consensus was reached, however, many biochemical and physiological studies were performed concerning the effects of OU on plants. Although these results were not entirely negative, interest in the question of the mode of action of OU on plants came to a virtual standstill as researchers focused their attentions on elucidating the properties of the dominant OU-insensitive H+-ATPases. It is not the purpose of this review to dispute the fundamental importance of OU-insensitive H+-ATPases in plant function, but rather to suggest that there may be some minor ATPases within higher plants that possess sensitivity to OU.

A survey of the botanical literature has found more than 50 published reports consistent with the idea that pharmacologically valid concentrations of OU (i.e. 125 µM or less) have physiological effects on plants or inhibit plant membrane ATPase activities in vitro. It is regrettable, therefore, that studies of the effects of OU on plants virtually ceased in the 1990s, even though there is now a whole new arsenal of molecular techniques that could be brought to bear on the question of the sites of OU action in plants. It is hoped that this review will revitalize interest in this moribund question.


    Origins of OU Sensitivity
TOP
Do Plants Have Ouabain...
Origins of OU Sensitivity
Physiological Effects of OU
Two OU-Sensitive ATPases?
LITERATURE CITED

The H+-ATPases of plants and fungi, the Na+, K+-ATPase of animals, as well as certain other types of ATPases (e.g. the plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase, the gastric H+, K+-ATPase, and the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase) are all related members of a larger molecular family---the P-type ATPases (Green, 1992). The fact that at least one other P-type ATPase besides the Na+, K+-ATPase exhibits sensitivity to OU, namely the H+, K+-ATPase of colonocytes (Cougnon et al., 1996), raises the possibility that the OU-sensitive ATPases in plants need not necessarily act as Na+ pumps. Experiments have shown that there may be less distinction between the various types of P-type ATPases than their essentialist names would suggest. For example, the Na+, K+-ATPase of animal cells can, under certain conditions, pass protons instead of Na+ ions (Polvani and Blostein, 1988), and, conversely, the gastric H+, K+-ATPase can, under certain conditions, pass Na+ ions instead of protons (Polvani et al., 1989). Thus, researchers should be attentive to the possibility that OU-sensitive ATPases in plants could be serving slightly or very different functions from their counterparts in animal cells.

Reports that OU affects physiological processes in ciliates (Fabczak and Fabczak, 1989), euglenozoa (Mikolajczyk, 1986), fungi (Ayres et al., 1987; Rauforova et al., 1997), green algae (Meszes and Erdei, 1969), and cyanobacteria (Iwano, 1995) suggest that OU sensitivity may have had an ancient origin during the molecular phylogeny of P-type ATPases.


    Physiological Effects of OU
TOP
Do Plants Have Ouabain...
Origins of OU Sensitivity
Physiological Effects of OU
Two OU-Sensitive ATPases?
LITERATURE CITED

OU has been found to influence many physiological processes and parameters in plants, including membrane potential (Stolarek, 1968a; Latala, 1975; Zientara, 1983; Solic and Zuvic, 1990), Na+ fluxes (Cram, 1968; Ozerskii, 1969; Davis and Jaworski, 1979), K+ fluxes (MacRobbie, 1962; Stolarek, 1968b), amino acid uptake (Basu et al., 1988), electrical signaling (Desbiez, 1973; Pazurkiewicz-Kocot and Stolarek, 1980; Karege et al., 1982; Slesak, 1984), stomatal aperture (Thomas, 1970; Turner, 1973), pulvinar function (Watanabe, 1971; Jonas, 1976) respiration (Legros et al., 1973; Migliaccio 1973) secretion (Brown et al., 1964), root pressure (Mozhaeva et al., 1979), transpiration (Morant-Avice et al., 1997), and flowering (Oota, 1974).


    Two OU-Sensitive ATPases?
TOP
Do Plants Have Ouabain...
Origins of OU Sensitivity
Physiological Effects of OU
Two OU-Sensitive ATPases?
LITERATURE CITED

Two studies (Brown et al., 1964; Thomas, 1970) produced OU dose response curves very similar to those commonly found in animal studies. In other cases (e.g. Nassery and Baker, 1972), the dose response curves for OU sensitivity are shifted over more than 3 orders of magnitude. This suggests that there are may be two OU-sensitive processes in plants: one (type 1) with an I50 of approximately 0.1 µM, and the other (type 2) with a concentration for half-inhibition (I50) of approximately 100 µM. Oota's (1974) finding of an unusual U-shaped dose response curve suggests that the Lemna gibba flowering response he studied may be lowered by type 1 OU inhibition and enhanced by type 2 OU inhibition.

Other evidence that there may be more than one site of OU sensitivity in plants comes from biochemical studies. Lindberg (1982) concluded that two forms of OU-sensitive ATPases exist in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) roots; one with an optimal pH of 5.5 to 6.0, and the other with an optimal pH of 8.0. It has been hypothesized that the acidophilic OU-sensitive ATPase is endomembranous. It may be germane in this regard that plants do have a P-type Ca2+-ATPase coded for by a single gene, which is found in both the plasma membrane and the vacuolar membrane (Ferrol and Bennett, 1996). Because OU interacts with the extracellular face of the Na+, K+-ATPase, researchers have tended to ignore the effects of intracellular OU. OU, however, is also taken up internally into animal cells (Nunez-Duran et al., 1988). The possibility that OU may have an intracellular site of action in plants is one that should be considered.

    FOOTNOTES

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.900046.


    LITERATURE CITED
TOP
Do Plants Have Ouabain...
Origins of OU Sensitivity
Physiological Effects of OU
Two OU-Sensitive ATPases?
LITERATURE CITED

  • Ayres R, Steinkraus KH, Olek A, Farr D (1987) Characterization of the semi-purified membrane-bound-ATPases of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii adapted to 18% sodium chloride. Int J Food Microbiol 4: 331-340[CrossRef]
  • Basu A, Sethi U, Guha-Mukherjee S (1988) Involvement of phytochrome in calcium-dependent, calmodulin-independent L-leucine uptake in Brassica. Plant Sci 58: 25-34
  • Brown HD, Jackson RT, Dupuy HJ (1964) Transport of sugar in Allium: effects of inhibitors and ethylene. Nature 202: 722-723[Medline]
  • Cougnon M, Planelles G, Crowson MS, Shull GE, Rossier BC, Juisser R (1996) The rat distal colon P-ATPase alpha -subunit encodes a ouabain-sensitive H+, K+-ATPase. J Biol Chem 271: 7277-7280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Cram WJ (1968) The effects of ouabain on sodium and potassium fluxes in excised roots of carrot. J Exp Bot 19: 611-616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Davis RF, Jaworski AZ (1979) Effects of ouabain and low temperature on the sodium efflux pump in excised corn roots. Plant Physiol 63: 940-946[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Desbiez MO (1973) Précisions sur le mécanisme des corrélations entre bourgeons cotylédoniares induites par des stimulations mécaniques du cotylédon chez Bidens pilosus. Z Pflanzenphysiol 69: 174-180
  • Fabczak H, Fabczak S (1989) Modulators of intracellular sodium concentration affect contractile vacuole activity in ciliate Blepharisma japonicum. Acta Protozool 28: 253-264
  • Ferrol N, Bennett AB (1996) A single gene may encode differentially localized Ca2+-ATPases in tomato. Plant Cell 8: 1159-1169[Abstract]
  • Green NM (1992) Evolutionary relationships within the family of P-type cation pumps. Ann N Y Acad Sci 671: 104-112[CrossRef][Medline]
  • Iwano M (1995) Selective effect of salt stress on the activity of two ATPases in cell membrane of Nostoc muscorum. Plant Cell Physiol 36: 1297-1301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jonas H (1976) Mimosa pudica L.: responses to electrical and mechanical stimuli, cardenolides and light. Z Pflanzenphysiol 80: 395-406
  • Karege F, Pebel C, Greppin H (1982) Rapid correlation between the leaves of spinach and the photocontrol of a peroxidase activity. Plant Physiol 69: 437-441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Latala A (1975) Investigation of the changes in the trans-membrane potential of the leaf cell of the moss Funaria hygrometrica. Bull Acad Pol Sci 23: 717-723
  • Legros F, Saines M, Conard V (1973) Competitive effect of insulin and ouabain on metabolism of Acetabularia mediterranea. Arch Int Physiol Biochem 81: 745-754[Medline]
  • Lindberg S (1982) Sucrose and ouabain effects on the kinetic properties of a membrane bound (Na+ + K+ + Mg2+) ATPase in sugar beet roots. Physiol Plant 54: 455-460
  • MacRobbie EAC (1962) Ionic relations of Nitella translucens. J Gen Physiol 45: 861-878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Meszes G, Erdei L (1969) The effect of pH and the ATPase activity of the unicellular alga Scenedesmus obtusiusculus CHOD. Acta Biochim Biophys Acad Sci Hung 4: 357-363[Medline]
  • Migliaccio F (1973) Ouabain effect of water retention in root tissues. Agrochimica 17: 499-503
  • Mikolajczyk E (1986) Sodium-potassium transport and photosensitivity of the colorless flagellate Peranema tricophorum (Euglenida). Photochem Photobiol 43: 455-460
  • Morant-Avice AA, Jurvilliers P, Tremblin G, Coudret A (1997) Effect of ouabain on stomatal movements and transpiration rate of Secale cereale. Biol Plant 39: 235-242[CrossRef]
  • Mozhaeva LV, Pil'shchikova NV, Kuzina VI (1979) Study on the nature of the motive force of plant exudation with the use of chemical effects. Izv Timirya Sel'skokh Akad 1979: 3-9
  • Nassery H, Baker DA (1972) Extrusion of sodium ions by barley roots: I. Characteristics of the extrusion mechanism. Ann Bot 36: 881-887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Nunez-Duran H, Riboni L, Ubaldo E, Kabela E, Barcenas-Ruiz L (1988) Ouabain uptake by endocytosis in isolated guinea pig atria. Am J Physiol 255: C1478-C1485
  • Oota Y (1974) Removal of the sugar inhibition of flowering in Lemna gibba G3 by catecholamines. Plant Cell Physiol 15: 63-68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Ozerskii MI (1969) Effects of X-radiation on the permeability of the alga Nitella flexilis to 22Na ions. Radiobiology 91: 156-159
  • Pazurkiewicz-Kocot K, Stolarek J (1980) Effect of phytohormones on the generation and propagation of action potentials in Phaseolus vulgaris. Pr Nauk Uniw Slask Kat 375: 18-28
  • Polvani CC, Blostein R (1988) Protons as substitutes for sodium and potassium in the sodium pump reaction. J Biol Chem 263: 167657-167663
  • Polvani CC, Sachs G, Blostein R (1989) Sodium ions as substitutes for protons in the gastric H, K-ATPase. J Biol Chem 264: 17854-17859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Rauforova L, Metlicka R, Benes I, Kotyk A, Janacek K (1997) Cell volume regulation in Claviceps fusiformis: an animal-type Na-K-ATPase in a fungus? Biochem Mol Biol Intl 41: 153-160[Medline]
  • Slesak E (1984) The influence of inhibitors of ATPases on action potentials in pumpkin. Folia Soc Sci Lublin 26: 141-143
  • Solic F, Zuvic M (1990) Influence of ouabain on the resting potential of plant cell and isolated protoplasmic droplet. Stud Biophys 138: 169-173
  • Stolarek J (1968a) The effect of IAA on bioelectric potentials and resistances in giant algal cells. Stud Biophys 6: 187-192
  • Stolarek J (1968b) Ionic relations and electrophysiology of single cells of Characeae: II. The effect of IAA on sodium and potassium influx in cells of Nitella translucens. Acta Soc Bot Pol 36: 337-345
  • Thomas DA (1970) The regulation of stomatal aperture in tobacco leaf epidermal strips: II. The effect of ouabain. Aust J Biol Sci 23: 981-989
  • Turner NC (1973) Action of fusicoccin on the potassium balance of guard cells of Phaseolus vulgaris. Am J Bot 60: 717-725
  • Watanabe S (1971) Ouabain and IAA effects on Mimosa pudica. Artes Liberales Iwate Univ 8: 75-80
  • Zientara M (1983) Effect of auxin, gibberellin and kinetin on membrane potential and proton pump in wheat coleoptile cells. Acta Soc Bot Pol 52: 279-284
Peter V. Minorsky

Department of Natural Sciences
Mercy College
Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522

© 2002 American Society of Plant Physiologists




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Plant Biologists