|
|
||||||||
|
First published online August 29, 2002; 10.1104/pp.004721 Plant Physiol, September 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 78-89 Effect of Regulated Overexpression of the MADS Domain Factor AGL15 on Flower Senescence and Fruit Maturation1Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1381
We have examined the effect of regulated overexpression of AGL15, a member of the MADS domain family of regulatory factors, on reproductive tissues. Using molecular and physiological markers, we show that constitutive overexpression of AGL15 in Arabidopsis leads to delay and down-regulation of senescence programs in perianth organs and developing fruits and alters the process of seed desiccation. Through genetic crosses, we show that the rate of water loss in the maturing seeds is dictated by the genetic composition and physiological state of the maternal tissue, rather than the embryo. To define the developmental time and/or place when senescence programs are most affected by elevated AGL15 levels, we expressed AGL15 under the control of various promoters. Expression during senescence or in abscission zone cells did not produce delays in floral organ senescence or abscission. Using a glucocorticoid-inducible expression system, we show that an increase in AGL15 levels around the time of flower opening is necessary to delay senescence and increase floral organ longevity.
Members of the MADS domain family of
transcriptional regulators participate in a variety of developmental
processes in Arabidopsis, including regulation of floral organ identity
(Yanofsky et al., 1990 Members of the MADS domain family have been shown recently to be
important for developmental processes that involve cell separation. For
example, SHP1 (SHATTERPROOF1) and SHP2 (SHATTERPROOF2) act redundantly to specify cell identity in the dehiscence zone in Arabidopsis fruits and to promote the lignification of cells adjacent to the dehiscence zone (Liljegren et al., 2000 In a previous study, we showed that constitutive overexpression of the
MADS domain protein AGL15 (AGAMOUS like 15) results in delays in
abscission of sepals and petals in Arabidopsis (Fernandez et al.,
2000 AGL15 preferentially accumulates in young tissues, and our working
hypothesis is that endogenous AGL15 operates to maintain or enhance an
immature or juvenile or non-senescent state in those tissues.
Constitutive overexpression of AGL15 might result in repression of some
aspect of programmed senescence in aging floral tissues. Abscission of
an organ is often coupled to its senescence, although petals appear to
be shed in a turgid state in Arabidopsis (Bleecker and Patterson,
1997 In the first part of the work reported here, we examined the impact of AGL15 overexpression on senescence programs in floral organs and fruits and explored the relationship between fruit maturation and the process of seed desiccation. We then generated transgenic plants where AGL15 was expressed only in abscission zones or only during senescence to examine the contribution of cell- or program-specific expression to the effect on senescence. Finally, we set up a system where overexpression of AGL15 could be induced by the addition of glucocorticoid. Using this system, we show that AGL15 overexpression must be induced before the onset of senescence and abscission to produce subsequent delays in these processes.
The Effect of Overexpression of AGL15 on Perianth Senescence Arabidopsis plants that constitutively express AGL15 exhibit
increased perianth organ longevity (Fernandez et al., 2000
The Effect of Overexpression of AGL15 on Fruit Wall Senescence Overexpression of AGL15 also affects maturation processes in
developing fruits. In Arabidopsis, the gynoecium, i.e. fourth whorl
floral organs, develops into a silique that undergoes senescence when
the seeds become mature. The siliques of plants constitutively overexpressing AGL15 remain green for an extended period of time. To
compare the rates of silique maturation in these plants with wild type,
we measured changes in chlorophyll content over time. Wild-type
siliques contained approximately 1,200 µg chlorophyll g
Siliques from plants that constitutively overexpress AGL15 had a higher
chlorophyll content at all stages. As Figure 2A shows, the maturation
process had three distinct phases, marked by different rates of
chlorophyll loss. From 9 to 13 DAP, chlorophyll content declined fairly
rapidly. From 13 to 15 DAP, chlorophyll content declined very slowly,
and then from 15 to 23 DAP, the chlorophyll content declined rapidly
again. At 17 DAP, when the siliques of wild-type plants are fully
mature, the siliques of plants carrying the AGL15 transgene still
contain approximately one-half of the amount of chlorophyll present at
9 DAP. These siliques finally become yellow or brownish yellow around
21 to 23 DAP, when they contained approximately 100 µg chlorophyll
g The effect of AGL15 overexpression on activation of the SAG12 promoter in maturing siliques was also examined. The same population of plants used for the floral organ analysis (35S:gAGL15 segregating in the presence of an SAG12: GUS reporter) was used in this study. In progeny that lacked the 35S:gAGL15 transgene, GUS activity could be detected in tissues of the fruit wall by 16 to 17 DAP (Fig. 2C). This is quite late in the senescence process and coincides with the final stages of chlorophyll loss in the siliques. In siblings that carried the AGL15 transgene, SAG12 promoter activity could not be detected in the fruits until 21 to 23 DAP (Fig. 2D), which corresponds to the final stages of chlorophyll loss in these siliques. Thus, based on the chlorophyll loss profiles and SAG12 promoter activity, senescence of fruit tissues appears to be delayed by almost 5 to 6 d when AGL15 is constitutively overexpressed. To determine whether SAG12 promoter activity is down-regulated as well as delayed in the silique tissues, GUS activity was quantified by measuring emitted fluorescence after incubations with 4-methyl umbelliferyl glucuronide. At 17 DAP, the GUS activity in silique tissues of control plants was approximately 10-fold higher than the GUS activity in silique tissues of plants with the AGL15 transgene (Fig. 2B). The GUS activity increased with age in the silique tissues of the plants constitutively expressing AGL15, but never reached the levels observed in the control plants. The maximal activity, measured at 25 DAP, was approximately 25% of that in control plants at 17 DAP. After 25 DAP, the siliques tended to shatter during harvest, and no further measurements of GUS activity were made. The Effect of Overexpression of AGL15 on Seed Desiccation What are the consequences of increased silique tissue longevity? One possible effect, because the silique tissues have higher water potentials for a longer period, is an alteration in the decline in water content that marks the later stages of seed development. We compared the water content of seeds collected from self-pollinated wild-type plants and seeds from self-pollinated transgenic plants that contain a single copy of either 35S:AGL15 or 35S:gAGL15 in the hemizygous condition. As shown in Figure 3A, the initial water content and decline in water content from 9 to 15 DAP were very similar in seeds of wild-type plants (black line) and seeds of plants carrying AGL15 transgenes (blue and red lines). After 15 DAP, the water content of seeds of wild-type plants continued to drop rapidly and reached approximately 5% at 19 DAP. For seeds developing on plants constitutively overexpressing AGL15, the decline in seed water content slowed around 15 DAP. The seed water content was maintained at approximately 30% to 40% from 17 to 23 DAP and then declined rapidly after 23 DAP to reach 6% to 8% at 31 DAP. We conclude that constitutive overexpression of AGL15 leads to alterations in water relations in the developing fruit.
Does expression of the AGL15 transgene in the embryo contribute to this effect? We addressed this question genetically in two ways. First, we pollinated wild-type plants with pollen from transgenic plants carrying a single copy of the 35S:AGL15 transgene in the homozygous condition. The resulting seeds contained embryos with one copy of the AGL15 transgene and wild-type seed coats, and were surrounded by wild-type silique tissues. As shown in Figure 3B, the decline in water content in the seeds resulting from such crosses (green line) was similar to that in the seeds from self-pollinated wild-type plants (black line). Thus, presence of the AGL15 transgene in embryos is not sufficient to cause a delay in seed desiccation. Second, we pollinated transgenic plants that were hemizygous for the AGL15 transgene with wild-type pollen. This increased the frequency of wild-type embryos in developing fruits from 25% (selfed 35S:AGL15 plant, blue line, Fig. 3A) to 50% (pink line, Fig. 3B). However, the rate and pattern of water content decline of the seeds, shown by the pink line in Figure 3B, did not change. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the genotype of the embryo contributes little to the effect of AGL15 overexpression on seed desiccation. The Effect of Abscission Zone-Specific Expression of AGL15 In our previous study, we showed that constitutive overexpression
of AGL15 leads to delays in perianth organ abscission (Fernandez et
al., 2000 To overexpress AGL15 in the abscission zone, we transformed plants with
a construct designated Chi: gAGL15, which consisted of the promoter of
a bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) chitinase gene (Broglie
et al., 1989
The Effect of Senescence-Induced Expression of AGL15 We have shown that overexpression of AGL15 leads to delays in
floral organ senescence and fruit maturation. Does overexpression of
AGL15 have the same effect if it occurs after the start of tissue
senescence? To address this question, transgenic plants in which AGL15
is expressed under the control of the SAG12 promoter were generated.
Previous studies showed that placing expression of bacterial cytokinin
synthesis genes under the control of this promoter leads to delayed
leaf senescence (Gan and Amasino, 1995
Plants that overexpress AGL15 in senescing tissues resembled wild-type plants in most regards. Leaf senescence was not affected and floral organ senescence and abscission were not visibly altered (Fig. 5, B and C). Fruit maturation appeared to be slightly delayed, however. The siliques turned yellow 2 to 4 d later (relative to the time of pollination) in the transgenic plants than in wild-type plants (not shown). Based on these results, we conclude that, although it is possible to see some effects in fruits, senescence-induced overexpression of AGL15 is not equivalent to constitutive overexpression in terms of enhancing organ longevity. The Effect of Elevation of AGL15 at Different Stages We used a glucocorticoid-inducible expression system to more clearly define when overexpression of AGL15 exerts its effects. A line carrying a transcriptional regulator activated by the application of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (35S:GVG), obtained from Dr. Nam-Hai Chua (Rockefeller University, New York), was crossed to a line carrying the regulatory "target" (UAS:AGL15). Plants carrying both constructs were selected in the F3 generation. Overexpression of AGL15 was induced at various times by applying dexamethasone, either by bottom watering (for systemic induction) or by spraying (for local induction). The effectiveness of the induction system was established through gel-blot analysis (Fig. 6A) of total RNA samples isolated from induced and uninduced plants. AGL15 transcripts accumulated at higher levels in plants carrying the induction system than in wild-type plants, even in the absence of dexamethasone induction. However, the perianth organs of these plants senesced and abscised normally (not shown), indicating that the constitutive expression due to the leakiness of the system is below the threshold needed for overexpression effects. In plants treated with dexamethasone, AGL15 transcripts accumulate at higher levels than in plants carrying 35S:AGL15 constructs (Fig. 6A).
To determine when AGL15 overexpression is most critical for extended organ longevity, AGL15 was induced systemically by introducing dexamethasone into the solution used for watering at various times after the start of germination. We found that systemic induction during the reproductive phase was sufficient to produce the overexpression effects in floral organs. The plants did not need to be exposed to dexamethasone during the vegetative phase or during the transition to flowering. Spraying the inflorescence with dexamethasone was just as effective as systemic induction. All of the unopened floral buds sprayed with dexamethasone gave rise to flowers showing delayed abscission and senescence of perianth organs (Fig. 6, B and C). Buds sprayed with solutions lacking dexamethasone showed no effects on either senescence or abscission (Fig. 6D). Open flowers sprayed with dexamethasone also showed no effects, even though AGL15 transcripts accumulated in these flowers (not shown). We conclude that stage 13 (flower opening) marks a period of transition with regard to the sensitivity of floral tissues and senescence programs to increased AGL15 levels. Induction of AGL15 overexpression can occur as late as stage 11 or 12 but must occur before stage 13 (bud anthesis) to increase floral organ longevity.
Overexpression of AGL15 Affects Multiple Developmental Processes Overexpression of AGL15 results in an overall delay in abscission
and senescence in reproductive tissues. In addition to the previously
reported effects on perianth organ longevity and abscission (Fernandez
et al., 2000 Overexpression of AGL15 leads to both down-regulation and delays in the molecular programs associated with senescence in floral organs and maturing siliques. In wild-type plants, the senescence reporter SAG12:GUS is activated as early as 3 DAP in the floral organs and during the final stages of chlorophyll loss in silique tissues. When AGL15 is overexpressed, SAG12 promoter activation is delayed by up to 3 d in floral organs. SAG12 promoter activation and chlorophyll loss are both delayed in the fruits of plants overexpressing AGL15, and GUS activity is significantly lower at the final stages of fruit maturation than in wild-type plants. We conclude that AGL15 serves as a repressor of senescence when it is constitutively overexpressed, and is likely to act at a point upstream of both the final stages of chlorophyll loss and SAG12 promoter activation. Overexpression of AGL15 results in an extended desiccation phase during seed development. During the maturation phase, seed fresh and dry weight increase rapidly due to synthesis and deposition of storage reserves. During the desiccation phase, both the fresh weight and water content drop as the seeds lose water. The desiccation phase is longer in the seeds produced on plants overexpressing AGL15 largely because of changes in the profile of water loss. Although seed water content usually declines at a steady rate throughout the desiccation phase in wild type, seed water content is maintained around the 30% to 40% level for several days (from 17-23 DAP) in plants overexpressing AGL15. Although the decline in water content later resumes, seed maturation is delayed. The seeds remain green several days longer and will not germinate readily if they are excised during this period (not shown), indicating that they are not yet fully mature. Although an extension of the maturation period might be expected to enhance reserve accumulation, this does not appear to be the case here. The levels of storage proteins in mature seeds obtained from plants that overexpress AGL15 are not elevated relative to the levels in mature wild-type seeds (K.W. Nichols and D.E. Fernandez, unpublished data). Effects on Fruit Maturation and Seed Desiccation Can Be Attributed to AGL15 Overexpression in Maternal Tissues Can any part of the effects on fruit maturation and seed desiccation be attributed to signals coming from embryos that carry the AGL15 transgene? We found that introducing the AGL15 transgene into embryos is not sufficient to produce the overexpression effects in wild-type females. In addition, when crosses are performed with transgenic females such that the dosage and/or the frequency of embryos carrying the AGL15 transgene is reduced, no alteration is seen in the pattern of water content decline or rate of fruit senescence relative to self-pollinated transgenic plants. Hence, we conclude that transgene expression in the maternal tissues is necessary, and may be sufficient, to direct the changes seen with AGL15 overexpression. Overexpression of AGL15 affects several features that may contribute to
changes in water balance and the delay in seed desiccation. First,
delays in fruit wall senescence may result in the maintenance of higher
water potentials inside the silique. Seed desiccation is associated
with senescence of the pod or capsule in legumes (Greenwood and Bewley,
1982 Another possible contributing factor in this developmental context
would be an effect on seed detachment. The final stages of seed
desiccation occur after the vascular supply to the seed is severed
through funiculus "abscission" (Kermode, 1990 The Effects of Abscission- and Senescence-Induced Expression of AGL15 Abscission is frequently associated with senescence of the organ
distal to the point of cell separation, and both processes can be
initiated in response to the same developmental and environmental factors (Taylor and Whitelaw, 2001 If AGL15's primary effect is on genes controlling abscission, we might expect that overexpression of AGL15 in abscission zone cells would be sufficient to achieve the floral overexpression phenotype. We found, however, that when AGL15 is supplied ectopically only in the abscission zone, the perianth organs on such plants both senesce and abscise as in wild type. We cannot rule out the possibility that abscission zone-specific expression at an earlier stage, before the chitinase promoter is active, would have the desired effect; however, our results suggest that the effect on abscission is a secondary effect. If AGL15 regulates senescence genes directly, we might expect to see aspects of the overexpression phenotype if AGL15 is supplied at elevated levels during the course of senescence. However, plants that express AGL15 in a senescence-activated manner show no change in the timing of perianth organ senescence and abscission relative to wild type. In fact, in subsequent experiments with glucocorticoid-inducible expression, we found that AGL15 overexpression that occurs anytime after the flowers open is ineffective. Fruit senescence, on the other hand, is somewhat delayed relative to wild type when AGL15 is expressed in a senescence-activated manner, although not to the extent it is in plants that constitutively overexpress AGL15. Thus, although AGL15 may affect some aspects of late senescence programs, it cannot act to halt or reverse the senescence process in either flowers or fruits if it is expressed after senescence is initiated. Overexpression of AGL15 before the Onset of Senescence and Abscission Produces Pronounced Effects To investigate the contribution the timing of AGL15 overexpression
makes to the total picture of overexpression effects, we set up a
system that allowed us to inducibly express AGL15 at high levels.
Although the system showed some "leakiness" (i.e. AGL15 is
expressed at low levels even in the absence of the glucocorticoid inducer), phenotypic changes were associated exclusively with induction
and high-level expression. Our studies showed that induction before the
transition to flowering or in very young floral buds is not necessary.
Induction immediately (1 d) before the flower opens is sufficient to
achieve the full overexpression effect on perianth longevity and
retention. This corresponds to the period when AGL15 promoter activity
normally ceases in wild-type flowers (Fernandez et al., 2000 In summary, overexpression of AGL15 affects the progression of developmental programs, particularly those that involve both senescence and abscission/cell separation, in flowers, fruits, and seeds. Transgenic plants can often provide new insights into important physiological relationships. In this case, we see a particularly striking demonstration of the strong connection between senescence/maturation of the maternal tissues and the process of seed desiccation. Based on our analysis of the effects of regulated AGL15 overexpression, we conclude that programs operating in cells in the presenescent state or just initiating senescence are most sensitive to changes in AGL15 levels. The phenotypic changes likely reflect changes in gene regulation that occur at a stage before obvious signs of abscission or senescence appear.
Plant Material Arabidopsis ecotype Wassilewskija (Ws) was used in all
experiments unless otherwise specified. Plants were grown to maturity in a growth chamber (Enconair Ecological Chamber, Winnipeg, Canada) with a 16-h-light (approximately 125 µEm Chlorophyll Content Measurement Newly opened flowers were hand pollinated and siliques were
collected at various DAP. Two siliques from each of two individual plants were collected, weighed, quickly frozen with liquid nitrogen, and stored at
Senescence Reporter Gene Analysis Seeds of a line (Landsberg erecta ecotype)
carrying a single insertion of the SAG12:GUS reporter gene construct
(Gan and Amasino, 1995 GUS Activity Assays For histochemical assays, tissues were incubated with 0.5 mg
mL For fluorometric assays, siliques at different developmental stages
were harvested, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
Water Content Analysis For each data point, a total of eight to 12 staged siliques were
collected from eight to 12 individual plants. To determine fresh
weight, the seeds were removed from the siliques using forceps, pooled,
and weighed. To determine dry weight, each seed sample was then baked
at 80°C for 5 h and weighed again. The water content was
calculated as follows:
Generation of Transgenic Arabidopsis To express AGL15 in the floral organ abscission zones, AGL15 was
placed under the control of regulatory sequences from a bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) abscission chitinase gene (Chi:gAGL15).
A 1.4-kb fragment, representing the chitinase upstream regulatory region plus 24 bp of the coding sequence, was excised from pBD3226 (Broglie et al., 1989 To express AGL15 during senescence, AGL15 was placed under the control
of regulatory sequences from the SAG12 gene (Gan and Amasino, 1995 Immunohistochemistry Arabidopsis tissues were fixed with 4% (w/v) freshly prepared
paraformaldehyde and 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100 in 50 mM
potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, at 4°C overnight. Fixed tissues
were embedded in paraffin medium (Paraplast Plus, Sigma, St.
Louis) and sectioned (7 µm thick) with a steel knife.
Immunolocalization was performed using AGL15-specific antiserum, as
described previously (Perry et al., 1996 Analysis of Petal Break Strength Petal break strength was measured in flowers of the primary
inflorescence at the stage when at least 10 flowers had opened but
before global proliferative arrest (Hensel et al., 1994 System for Glucocorticoid-Inducible Expression of AGL15 The AGL15 coding sequence amplified from 35S:gAGL15 (Fernandez
et al., 2000 To introduce the glucocorticoid-regulated transcriptional activator
GVG, transgenic plants carrying the UAS-35S:gAGL15 construct were
crossed to transgenic plants carrying the TA7002:LUC construct (seed
obtained from Dr. Nam-Hai Chua, Rockefeller University). TA7002:LUC
contains the complete two-component glucocorticoid-inducible system
(Aoyama and Chua, 1997 Glucocorticoid Treatments Dexamethasone (Sigma), an analog of glucocorticoid, was
dissolved in 100% (v/v) ethanol to make a 30 mM
stock solution and stored at RNA Gel-Blot Analysis Total RNA was isolated according to the method described by
Verwoerd et al. (1989) Distribution of Materials Upon request, all novel materials described in this publication will be made available in a timely manner for noncommercial research purposes.
We thank Melissa Lehti-Shiu for helpful comments on the manuscript, Dr. Susheng Gan for the SAG12 reporter construct, Drs. Anthony Bleecker and Sara Patterson for the Chitinase construct, Dr. Nam-Hai Chua for the GVG constructs, and Claudia Lipke for assistance with plant photography.
Received February 27, 2002; returned for revision March 25, 2002; accepted April 16, 2002. 1 This work was supported by the University of Wisconsin (Madison) Graduate School, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (grant no. 96-35304-3699), and by the Department of Energy/National Science Foundation/U.S. Department of Agriculture Collaborative Program on Research in Plant Biology (grant no. DBI 96-02222).
2 Present address: Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC0349, La Jolla, CA 92093.
* Corresponding author; e-mail dfernand{at}facstaff.wisc.edu; fax 608-262-7509.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.004721.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|