First published online October 24, 2002; 10.1104/pp.008185
Plant Physiol, November 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 1552-1561
Mechanisms of Arsenic Hyperaccumulation in Pteris
vittata. Uptake Kinetics, Interactions with Phosphate, and
Arsenic Speciation1
Junru
Wang,2
Fang-Jie
Zhao,*
Andrew A.
Meharg,
Andrea
Raab,
Joerg
Feldmann, and
Steve P.
McGrath
Agriculture and Environment Division, Rothamsted Research,
Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom (J.W., F.-J.Z.,
S.P.M.); and School of Biological Sciences (A.A.M.) and Chemistry
(A.R., J.F.), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, United
Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
The mechanisms of arsenic (As) hyperaccumulation in
Pteris vittata, the first identified As
hyperaccumulator, are unknown. We investigated the interactions of
arsenate and phosphate on the uptake and distribution of As and
phosphorus (P), and As speciation in P. vittata. In an
18-d hydroponic experiment with varying concentrations of arsenate and
phosphate, P. vittata accumulated As in the fronds up to
27,000 mg As kg 1 dry weight, and the frond As to root As
concentration ratio varied between 1.3 and 6.7. Increasing phosphate
supply decreased As uptake markedly, with the effect being greater on
root As concentration than on shoot As concentration. Increasing
arsenate supply decreased the P concentration in the roots, but not in
the fronds. Presence of phosphate in the uptake solution decreased
arsenate influx markedly, whereas P starvation for 8 d increased
the maximum net influx by 2.5-fold. The rate of arsenite uptake was
10% of that for arsenate in the absence of phosphate. Neither P
starvation nor the presence of phosphate affected arsenite uptake.
Within 8 h, 50% to 78% of the As taken up was distributed to the
fronds, with a higher translocation efficiency for arsenite than for
arsenate. In fronds, 49% to 94% of the As was extracted with a
phosphate buffer (pH 5.6). Speciation analysis using high-performance
liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy
showed that >85% of the extracted As was in the form of arsenite, and the remaining mostly as arsenate. We conclude that arsenate is taken up
by P. vittata via the phosphate transporters, reduced to
arsenite, and sequestered in the fronds primarily as As(III).
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Arsenic (As) is ubiquitous in the
environment and is derived from both natural and anthropogenic sources.
As is a nonessential element for plants, and inorganic As species are
generally highly phytotoxic. Arsenate is the predominant As species in
aerobic soils, whereas arsenite dominates under anaerobic conditions
(Smith et al., 1998 ). Arsenate acts as a phosphate analog and can
disrupt phosphate metabolism, whereas arsenite reacts with sulfhydryl groups of enzymes and tissue proteins, leading to inhibition of cellular function and death (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ). In all
plant species tested so far, it has been shown that arsenate is taken
up via the phosphate transport systems (Asher and Reay, 1979 ; Lee,
1982 ; Ullrich-Eberius et al., 1989 ; Meharg and Macnair, 1992 ). Arsenate
resistance has been identified in a range of plant species, which is
generally achieved through a decreased uptake of arsenate because of
suppression of the high-affinity phosphate uptake system (Meharg and
Macnair, 1991 , 1992 ; Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ). Inside plant
cells, arsenate may be detoxified through reduction to arsenite, which
is subsequently complexed with thiols, particularly phytochelatins
(PCs; Pickering et al., 2000 ; Schmöger et al., 2000 ;
Hartley-Whitaker et al., 2001 ). It is possible that As-PC complexes are
sequestered in vacuoles, although direct evidence for this is still
lacking (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ).
The transfer of As from soil to plant is low for most plant species.
This may be because of several reasons: (a) low bioavailability of As
in soil, (b) restricted uptake by plant roots, (c) limited translocation of As from roots to shoots, and (d) As phytotoxicity at
relatively low concentrations in plant tissues. Recently, the brake
fern Pteris vittata has been found to be able to
hyperaccumulate As from soil (Ma et al., 2001 ). It can accumulate up to
22,630 mg As kg 1 in the shoot (frond) dry
weight. Furthermore, the bioconcentration factor, defined as the ratio
of shoot As concentration to soil As concentration, was greater than
10. The fern possesses three key features that are typical of
metal/metalloid hyperaccumulator plants: an efficient root uptake, an
efficient root to shoot translocation, and a much-enhanced tolerance to
As inside plant cells. After the discovery of this first As
hyperaccumulator, several other fern species, including
Pityrogramma calomelanos (Francesconi et al., 2002 ),
Pteris cretica, Pteris longifolia, and
Pteris umbrosa (Zhao et al., 2002 ), have recently been added
to the list of As hyperaccumulators. The hyperaccumulation trait of
these ferns may be potentially exploitable in phytoremediation of As
contaminated soils.
Because As hyperaccumulation in P. vittata is a newly
discovered phenomenon, the mechanisms involved have not been
elucidated. We do not know if arsenate is taken up via the phosphate
transporters in P. vittata, as has been shown for
nonaccumulator species. If so, how do phosphorus (P) and As interact
during uptake and root to shoot translocation? Specifically, how does
P. vittata acquire and maintain sufficient P nutrition under
high arsenate supply? Also, does P. vittata take up arsenate
and arsenite similarly efficiently, as implied by Ma et al. (2001) ?
What are the As species in fronds? This is particularly relevant to the
understanding of As detoxification inside plant cells. These questions
are the focus of the present paper. To address the P × As
interactions in plants, one has to use hydroponic culture rather than
soil culture, because the latter also involves interactions of P and As
in soil chemical processes.
 |
RESULTS |
The P. vittata plants from the University of
Florida (Gainesville) were collected from As-contaminated soils
(Ma et al., 2001 ), whereas the plants in the Oxford Botanical
Garden (Oxford) grew on an uncontaminated soil. Our preliminary
studies showed that both accessions hyperaccumulated As similarly,
suggesting that As hyperaccumulation in P. vittata is a
constitutive trait (Zhao et al., 2002 ).
Arsenate and Phosphate Interactions Experiment
Phytotoxicity was observed in the 416 and 2,080 µM
arsenate treatments when P supply was low (20 µM). The
symptoms of phytotoxicity were necrosis of pinnae around the edges and
tips of fronds. Increasing P supply alleviated As phytotoxicity.
However, shoot and root dry weights were not affected significantly by
either As or P treatments (data not shown).
As hyperaccumulation was demonstrated clearly in this experiment, with
As concentrations in the roots and shoots reaching up to 8,960 and
27,000 mg kg 1 dry weight, respectively (Fig.
1, a and b). In all +As treatments, the
concentration of As in the shoots was always greater than that in the
roots, with the shoot to root ratio of As concentration varying from
1.3 to 6.7. Increasing phosphate concentration in nutrient solution
decreased both root and shoot concentrations of As significantly
(P < 0.01), but the effect was proportionally larger
for roots than for shoots. For example, in the 83 µM arsenate treatment, increasing phosphate
from 20 to 100 µM decreased root and shoot As
concentrations by 76% and 46%, respectively. In the 416 µM arsenate treatment, increasing phosphate
from 20 to 500 µM decreased root and shoot As
concentrations by 73% and 41%, respectively. The inhibitory effect of
phosphate on root As concentration was larger than what may be expected
from a simple "dilution" of arsenate by phosphate in the solution,
implying that phosphate has a higher affinity to the uptake system in
the roots than arsenate. In contrast, the inhibitory effect of
phosphate on shoot As concentration was smaller than what may be
expected from a simple "dilution" effect.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Effects of varying concentrations of arsenate and
phosphate in nutrient solution on the concentrations of As in roots (a)
and shoots (b), and the concentrations of P in roots (c) and shoots (d)
of P. vittata. P. vittata plants were
precultured with full nutrient solution for 3 weeks, and then exposed
to different concentrations of arsenate and phosphate for 18 d.
Values are means ± SEs (n = 4).
|
|
The concentrations of P in the roots and shoots of P. vittata are shown in Figure 1, c and d, respectively. Increasing
arsenate concentration in the solution decreased the concentration of P in the roots significantly (P < 0.05), particularly
when the P supply was low (20 µM). In contrast,
the arsenate treatments had no significant effect on the P
concentration in the shoots. The pattern of P distribution between
roots and shoots was markedly different from that of As. In most cases,
the concentration of P in the roots was greater than that in the shoots.
Kinetics of Arsenate Uptake
Depletion of arsenate in the uptake solution was monitored over
8 h, which reflects the net uptake of As by roots. Figure 2a shows the depletion curves of arsenate
in one replicate of each of the three treatments. Because the rate of
depletion depends on root weight, the depletion data of different
replicates in the same treatment cannot be averaged. In Figure 2a, root
weights were similar between the three treatments, allowing direct
comparisons of the depletion rate between the treatments. It is clear
that in the P-sufficient plants (control), the presence of 50 µM phosphate slowed the depletion of arsenate greatly. In
the control without phosphate, the arsenate concentration in the uptake
solution decreased to a minimal concentration after about 4 h,
whereas in the +50 µM phosphate treatment, only about
20% of the arsenate was taken up during 8 h. Compared with the
P-sufficient plants, the treatment where the P supply was withheld for
8 d before the depletion experiment showed markedly increased
depletion rate (Fig. 2a).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
a, Depletion curves of arsenate in the uptake
solution as affected by the presence of 50 µM phosphate,
or by P starvation for 8 d. One replicate per treatment, with
similar root fresh weights. For the Control P and P-deficient P
treatments, a modified Michaelis-Menten equation was fitted to the data
(see "Materials and Methods"). For the Control +50 µM
phosphate treatment, a linear regression was fitted. b, Accumulation of
As by P. vittata in the depletion experiment with
arsenate, expressed on a basis of root fresh weight. Note that
SEs increased markedly when arsenate in the uptake solution
was exhausted because of variation in the root fresh weight between
replicates. A Gompertz model was fitted to the data of the Control P
and P-deficient P treatments, and a linear model to the data of the
Control +50 µM phosphate treatment.
|
|
Figure 2b shows the cumulative uptake of arsenate,
expressed on a basis of root fresh weight, in the three treatments. The rate of arsenate accumulation by roots decreased markedly when phosphate was present in the uptake solution, and increased when the
plants were starved of P for 8 d. The rate of As
accumulation was approximately linear in the first 90 and 240 min for
the P-deficient and -sufficient (control) treatments, respectively,
without the presence of phosphate, but was linear for the entire uptake
period (8 h) for the control +50 µM phosphate treatment.
During the linear accumulation phase, the net uptake rate of arsenate
was 90, 20, and 215 nmol g 1 root fresh weight
h 1 for the control P, control +50
µM phosphate, and P-deficient P treatments, respectively.
Claassen and Barber (1974) and Drew et al. (1984) demonstrated
that the depletion technique can be used to estimate kinetic parameters
of ion influx, providing that a near complete depletion was achieved.
Table I shows the kinetic parameters for
arsenate uptake by P. vittata estimated from the depletion
data of the control P and P-deficient P treatments. It was not
possible to estimate the kinetic parameters for the control +50
µM phosphate treatment because the depletion of
arsenate was far from complete. Compared with the P-sufficient plants
(control), the P deficiency treatment increased
Imax for arsenate by 2.5-fold
(P < 0.001), but had no significant effect on
Km (Table I). In addition,
Cmin was significantly higher
(P < 0.01) in the P-deficient plants.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I.
Kinetic parameters of arsenate influx in P. vittata
Plants were precultured with a full nutrient solution for 3 weeks for
the control treatments. In the P-deficient treatment, plants were
starved of P for 8 d before the depletion experiment. The initial
concentration of arsenate in the uptake solution was 5 µM. Values are means ± SE
(n = 5).
|
|
Kinetics of Arsenite Uptake
In the depletion experiment with arsenite, between 20% and 40%
of the initial arsenite was depleted over the 8-h period (Fig. 3a). The rate of depletion was much
slower than that for arsenate. The differences between the control P,
control +50 µM phosphate, and P-deficient treatments were
small. When the depletion data were expressed as accumulation on a root
fresh weight basis (Fig. 3b), the rate of arsenite accumulation by
P. vittata roots was 8 to 10 nmol g 1
root fresh weight h 1. There were no significant
differences between the three treatments. Because arsenite in the
uptake solution was far from being depleted, kinetic parameters could
not be obtained.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
a, Depletion curves of arsenite in the uptake
solution as affected by the presence of 50 µM phosphate,
or by P starvation for 8 d. One replicate per treatment, with
similar root fresh weights, is shown. A linear regression was fitted to
the data in different treatments. b, Accumulation of As by P.
vittata in the depletion experiment with arsenite, expressed on
the basis of root fresh weight. A linear regression was fitted to the
data in different treatments.
|
|
Distribution of As between Roots and Shoots
At the end of the depletion experiments (8 h), on average 60% and
71% of the As taken up was distributed to the shoots (fronds) fed with
arsenate and arsenite, respectively. A significantly (P < 0.05) higher proportion of As taken up was in the shoots when
arsenite was supplied than when arsenate was supplied (Table II). Presence of 50 µM phosphate in the uptake solution had no significant effect on the distribution of As between roots and shoots.
However, the pretreatment with P starvation for 8 d enhanced the
distribution of As to the shoots significantly (P < 0.001), in both the arsenate and arsenite depletion experiments (Table II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II.
Percentage of the As taken up during the 8-h
depletion experiment that was distributed to the shoots
P. vittata plants were precultured with a full nutrient
solution for 3 weeks for the control treatments. In the P-deficient
treatment, plants were starved of P for 8 d before the depletion
experiment. The initial concentration of arsenate or arsenite in the
uptake solution was 5 µM. Values are means ± SES (n = 5).
|
|
As Speciation in P. vittata Fronds
Total uptake of As over 2 weeks differed for arsenite and
arsenate, with As accumulation with arsenite being higher, though not
significantly so, than for arsenate (Table
III). However, the percentage of As
extracted into a phosphate buffer at pH 5.6 was significantly higher
for arsenate-treated fern (94%) than for arsenite (49%)
(P < 0.05).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III.
Speciation of arsenic extracted by phosphate
buffer (pH 5.6) from fronds of plants treated with either arsenate or
arsenite
P. vittata plants were precultured with full nutrient
solution for 3 weeks, and then exposed to 50 µM arsenite
or arsenate for 2 weeks. Values are means ± SES
(n = 3).
|
|
Chromatography using inductively coupled plasma mass
spectroscopy (ICP-MS)-specific detection for As of the phosphate
extracts of fronds, using both anion-exchange and size exclusion HPLC
columns, showed that only arsenite and arsenate were detected under the chromatography conditions, with arsenite predominating for both treatments. Chromatograms for size exclusion and anion exchange are
presented in Figures 4 and
5, respectively, showing the separation of both the pure standards and of the fern extracts, and that good
separations were achieved for the As species. There were no significant
differences in the proportion of arsenite or arsenate detected between
the arsenite- and arsenate-treated ferns.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Chromatograms (HPLC-ICP-MS) using SEC (30 mM phosphate buffer pH 5.6) for As speciation
(mass-to-charge ratio [m/z] 75).
a, Standard mixture of pentavalent and trivalent inorganic As [As(III)
and As(V)] and their methylated counterparts [monomethyarsonic acid
(MMA) (III), MMA(V), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) (III), and DMA(V)]. b,
P. vittata cultured in hydroponic solution containing
either 50 µM arsenate or 50 µM
arsenite.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Chromatograms (HPLC-ICP-MS) using anion-exchange
chromatography (20 mM carbonate buffer, pH 8.08) for As
speciation (m/z 75). a, Standard mixture
of pentavalent and trivalent inorganic As [As(III) and As(V)] and
their methylated counterparts [MMA(III), MMA(V), DMA(III), and
DMA(V)]. b, P. vittata cultured in hydroponic solution
containing either 50 µM arsenate or 50 µM
arsenite.
|
|
When the proportion of the extracted As detected by size exclusion and
anion exchange was investigated, it was found that more of the
extracted As was detected by anion exchange, and also that more As in
the extract was accounted for in the arsenite-treated plants compared
with the arsenate-treated plants (Table III). Two-way analysis of
variance showed that both the type of chromatography used
(P < 0.01) and the As species with which the plants
were treated (P < 0.05) were significant.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The ability of P. vittata to hyperaccumulate As in
shoots was clearly demonstrated in the long-term (18 d) hydroponic
experiment. The concentration of As in the shoots was up to 27,000 mg
kg 1 dry weight, although phytotoxic symptoms
started to appear once the concentration exceeded approximately 10,000 mg kg 1 dry weight. This threshold value is
similar to that reported by Tu and Ma (2002) , who grew the
fern plants on a soil spiked with different sources of As. The
tolerance of P. vittata to As is far greater than that
observed for many non-hyperaccumulating plant species, which have a
threshold concentration for phytotoxicity of between 5 and 100 mg
kg 1 dry weight (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias,
1992 ). Internal detoxification of As must be an important feature of
this hyperaccumulator species. In this respect, P. vittata
is in sharp contrast to As resistant grass species, including
Holcus lanatus, Deschampsia cespitosa, and
Agrostis capillaris, which have a much lower uptake rate of arsenate than nonresistant populations of the same species (Meharg and
Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ).
In all plant species studied thus far, it has been shown that arsenate
is taken up via the phosphate transport systems (Meharg and
Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ). Here, we have shown that the As
hyperaccumulator P. vittata is no exception. The influx of
arsenate was strongly depressed by the presence of phosphate in the
uptake solution (Fig. 2). In the long-term hydroponic experiment, the
concentrations of As in the plants were decreased by increasing the
phosphate concentration in the nutrient solution (Fig. 1). The
inhibitory effect was more apparent when the concentrations of
phosphate and arsenate in nutrient solution were comparable, and
affected the root As concentration more than the shoot As concentration.
It is well known that P deficiency increases the capacity of plant
roots to take up phosphate (Lee, 1982 ; Drew et al., 1984 ). Expression
of the genes encoding phosphate transporters is up-regulated in the
roots of P-deficient plants (Muchhal et al., 1996 ; Smith et al., 1997 ;
Liu et al., 1998 ), which also leads to a concurrent increase in the
transporter protein (Muchhal and Raghothama, 1999 ). This means that
plants increase their capacity for phosphate uptake in response to P
deficiency by synthesis of additional transporter molecules. If
phosphate transporters are responsible for arsenate uptake, then
arsenate uptake should be enhanced in P-deficient plants. Such an
effect has been reported in barley (Hordeum vulgare; Lee, 1982 ) and in the As-nonresistant population of H. lanatus (Meharg and Macnair, 1992 ), and was demonstrated clearly
in this study for the As hyperaccumulator P. vittata (Fig.
2). P starvation for 8 d was found to increase
Imax for arsenate by 2.5-fold,
suggesting an increased density of phosphate/arsenate transporters on
the plasma membranes in root cells. In contrast, the
Km for arsenate was not affected
significantly by P starvation.
Because the initial As concentration was low in the depletion
experiments, As uptake was most likely attributed to high-affinity systems. Kinetic parameters for ion influx obtained under different experimental conditions are not strictly comparable. However, it is
noteworthy that Imax for the
P-sufficient plants of P. vittata was within a similar range
of values reported for barley (Asher and Reay, 1979 ), rice (Oryza
sativa; Abedin et al., 2002 ), and As-nonresistant H. lanatus, D. cespitosa, and A. capillaris
(Meharg and Macnair, 1991 ; Meharg et al., 1994 ). The
Km for P. vittata (0.5-1
µM, Table I) appears to be much lower than the
values reported for the above plants species (6-25
µM). This difference may explain the highly
efficient uptake of As by P. vittata from low-As soils (Ma
et al., 2001 ). To elucidate whether P. vittata has an
enhanced ability to take up arsenate requires a comparison of influx
kinetics with an As non-hyperaccumulator fern that is taxonomically
close to P. vittata, and has a similar root morphology and
growth habit. So far, all accessions of P. vittata and three other Pteris spp. we have tested have proved to be As
hyperaccumulators (Zhao et al., 2002 ).
Ma et al. (2001) reported that, apart from arsenate, P. vittata can also hyperaccumulate As when arsenite, MMA, or DMA was added to soil. However, we show in this study that arsenite was taken
up by P. vittata very slowly, at a rate that was about
one-tenth of the arsenate influx, when phosphate was not present in the uptake solution. Furthermore, phosphate in the medium did not compete
with the uptake of arsenite, and nor did P starvation enhance arsenite
influx, indicating that arsenite uptake does not share the same
transport systems for phosphate. In the study of Ma et al. (2001) , it
is possible that arsenite was oxidized to arsenate in the soil before
being taken up by the fern. Arsenate is the predominant species of As
in aerobic soils (Smith et al., 1998 ). Mechanisms of arsenite uptake by
higher plants remain unclear. Abedin et al. (2002) observed comparable
rates of uptake for arsenate and arsenite by paddy rice, which grows in
flooded environments where arsenite is the predominant As species. A
recent study by Wysocki et al. (2001) showed that arsenite was
transported across the plasma membrane of yeast (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae) via a glycerol channel protein.
In the experiment with 2-week exposure of arsenate or arsenite,
arsenite was taken up in as great a quantity as arsenate by the plants
(Table III), yet the rate of arsenite transport was much lower (Fig.
3). The relatively high level of phosphate in the root incubating
solution (100 µM) and in the pretreatment conditions (500 µM) will lead to suppression of high-affinity phosphate/arsenate transport (as observed in Fig. 2), and phosphate is
highly efficient at competing with arsenate for this transporter (Fig.
2). Both of these factors will lead to suppression of arsenate, but not
arsenite uptake.
The most striking feature associated with the As hyperaccumulation by
P. vittata lies in the exceedingly efficient transport from
roots to shoots. This trait is observed in other heavy metal hyperaccumulators (McGrath et al., 2002 ). In the depletion experiments (8 h), between 50% and 78% of As taken up had already been
transported to the fronds. The frond to root ratio of As concentration
was considerably larger than 1 in the long-term As × P experiment (and also Tu and Ma, 2002 ). In contrast, the shoot to root ratio of As concentration was <0.02 in tomato (Lycopersicum
esculentum) (Burló et al., 1999 ), <0.1 in Brassica
juncea (Pickering et al., 2000 ), and <0.2 in rice (Marin et al.,
1992 ) when arsenate was supplied. The frond to root ratio of P
concentration in P. vittata was smaller than 1. The fact
that arsenate had little effect on the concentration of P in the
fronds, and P had a much smaller effect on frond As concentration than
on root As concentration (Fig. 1) suggests that phosphate does not
compete with As in the long-distance transport from roots to
shoots. Arsenate can be readily reduced to arsenite both
enzymatically and nonenzymatically through, e.g. reactions with
glutathione (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ). If arsenite or its
complexes were the main forms of As for xylem loading and transport,
then it can be expected that As and P would not be competitive during
the processes. The observation that arsenite was more mobile from roots
to shoots than arsenate (Table II) supports this explanation. Pickering
et al. (2000) showed that addition of the dithiol As chelator
dimercaptosuccinate to the nutrient solution markedly enhanced As
transport from roots to shoots in the As nonaccumulator B. juncea. Whether arsenite is complexed before xylem loading and
xylem transport in P. vittata remains unclear.
As speciation in plant tissues by HPLC-ICP-MS is normally conducted on
methanol/water extracts, including previous studies of
As-hyperaccumulating ferns where only arsenate and arsenite have been
detected (Ma et al., 2001 ; Francesconi et al., 2002 ). Such
non-physiological extraction may disrupt As speciation in tissues.
PC-As complexes, known to be important species of As in a range of
plant species, dissociate under alkaline pH conditions to yield both
arsenite and arsenate (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ). Because of
this pH sensitivity, it is thought that As-PC complexes are localized
in the vacuole, and disrupting cells under nonphysiological conditions
would rapidly lead to an increase in the pH environment of the vacuolar
contents. However, in our study where pH was buffered to 5.6, only
inorganic As as arsenate and arsenite was detected. SEC would have
detected any PC-As complexes, as long as the complexes stayed intact or
did not stick to the column. There is a possibility that the As-PC
complexes were destroyed by our extraction procedure, but we know from
other studies that the As-PC complexes can survive extraction and
chromatography, though under different extraction and analytical
conditions to those we used here (Sneller et al., 1999 ). A recent study
using x-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy showed little evidence of coordination of As with S in a freeze-dried sample of
P. vittata fronds (Lombi et al., 2002 ). Furthermore, the
total concentrations of S in fronds were found to be much too small to
allow for a significant complexation of arsenite by PCs in a 1:3
stoichiometry of As:thiol (-SH), once the concentration of As in
fronds exceeded approximately 2,000 mg kg 1 dry
weight (Zhao et al., 2002 ). Based on the results obtained in this
study, we conclude that As is primarily present in inorganic forms in
fronds of P. vittita, although we cannot exclude the possibility of complexation. However, it is certain that no simple organo-As compounds, which have been detected in other terrestrial plant species at low levels (i.e. arsenobetaine, arsenocholine, arsenosugars, and methylated forms; Geiszinger et al., 2002 ; Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ), were present in the frond extracts. If As
is present predominantly as arsenite with some arsenate in P. vittata, this suggests effective storage of these species, either
intracellularly (such as in vacuoles) or in specialized cells where
disruption of biochemical processes or general plant function is either
unimportant or limited because both species disrupt a wide range of
metabolic activities (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ). A recent
study using energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis showed that As was
localized predominately in the vacuoles of the frond epidermal cells of
P. vittata (Lombi et al., 2002 ).
It can be seen from both the efficiency of As extraction from the
fronds, and from the As quantification by HPLC-ICP-MS, that other
species of As are present in the ferns besides arsenite and arsenate,
and that this speciation differs between the arsenate and arsenite
exposure treatments. Almost one-half the quantity of As was extracted
from the arsenite-treated plants compared with the arsenate-treated
plants, where extraction was highly effective (94% extraction; Table
III). Because arsenate, arsenite, and the common organo-arsenical
species are water soluble, these differences in extractability are
probably because of either As incorporation or complexation with
structural cellular components. The formation of arsenolipids such as
phospholipids or simply a binding to SH groups or disulfide bridges
in different kinds of macromolecules could result in a low extraction
efficiency. Because arsenite shows a high affinity for sulfur, the
latter scenario is more likely to take place for arsenite, which might be represented in the high abundance of the nonextractable As species
in the arsenite-treated ferns. These interactions with cellular
constituents are the primary causes of inorganic As toxicity. Because
arsenate is readily reduced intracellularly to arsenite in plant cells
(Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002 ), the differences in extraction
efficiencies may reflect differences in toxicology. Differences between
the toxicological stress imposed by the arsenate and arsenite
treatments may have led to specific changes to the plants' biochemical
processing of As, or to a nonspecific stress response that altered As biochemistry.
For the component extracted by phosphate buffer, there is also evidence
that other species were present besides arsenate and arsenite, but that
these species were not eluted, but rather absorbed to the column. About
20% to 30% more As was quantified from AEC compared with SEC (Table
III). For the arsenate treatment, only 50% of the As was detected by
the ICP-MS, with 50% remaining stuck to the column. Because the two
columns behaved differently with respect to accounting for the As, yet
only arsenate and arsenite were detected, this suggests differential
breakdown of complexed inorganic As on the columns. The anion exchange
was conducted at pH 8, where it is known that As-SH bonds are less
stable than at lower pHs.
Although we have gained some indications as to how As is speciated in
P. vittata, further work on the induction and regulation of
PCs (and potentially metallothionines) should be conducted, intercellular and intracellular localization needs to be ascertained, and As interaction with macromolecules or structural polymers needs investigating.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Culture
Spores of Pteris vittata were kindly provided by
Dr. Lena Ma (University of Florida, Gainesville) and were also
obtained from the Oxford Botanical Garden. The spores were sprinkled on
to moist potting compost in a seed tray. The tray was covered with a
plastic cling film to maintain moisture. After spore germination, the prothalli developed and were fertilized, and grew into sporelings with
true leaves (fronds). At the two-frond stage, sporelings were
transplanted individually into 8-cm pots containing a general purpose
potting compost, and allowed to grow to four to five fronds. Plant
roots were then washed carefully with tap water to remove adhering
compost, and transferred to 250-mL pots (one plant per pot) containing
a nutrient solution, which was a modified Hoagland solution with
one-half-strength major nutrients and full-strength micronutrients
(except that Fe was supplied as Fe-EDDHA at 100 µM;
Hewitt, 1966 ). The nutrient solution was aerated continuously and
renewed weekly. Experiments were conducted inside a controlled environment growth chamber with the following conditions: 16-h light
period with a light intensity of 350 µmol m 2
s 1, 25°C/20°C day/night temperature, and 60%
relative humidity.
Arsenate × Phosphate Interactions Experiment
Fern plants raised from the spores from Florida were used in
this experiment. After 3 weeks of preculture in hydroponics, plants
were treated with different combinations of phosphate and arsenate
concentrations. The phosphate concentrations were 20, 100, and 500 µM (supplied as
NH4H2PO4), and the concentrations of arsenate (Na2HAsO4) were 0, 83, 416, and 2080 µM. The concentration of
NH4+ was maintained at 1,000 µM
in all treatments by varying the concentration of NH4Cl.
All other nutrients were maintained at the same concentrations as in
the preculture solution. Solution pH was adjusted to 7.0. Nutrient
solutions were topped up every day and renewed once every 4 d.
Each treatment was replicated 4-fold. Plants were harvested 18 d
after the treatments were imposed. Roots and shoots were separated, and washed thoroughly with deionized water. Plant tissues were dried at 60°C for 48 h and dry weights recorded. Ground
plant materials were digested with a mixture of
HNO3:HClO4 (85:15 [v/v]), and the
concentrations of As and P were determined using ICP-atomic emission
spectroscopy (Fisons-ARL Accuris, Ecublens, Switzerland). The
detection limit of the instrument for As in solution was 0.02 mg
L 1. Blanks and internal standards were included for
quality assurance.
Short-Term Uptake Kinetics of Arsenate and Arsenite
Fern plants raised from the spores obtained from the Oxford
Botanical Garden were used in this experiment. The kinetics of arsenate
and arsenite influx were studied using a solution depletion technique
similar to that described by Claassen and Barber (1974) and by
Drew et al. (1984) . After 3 weeks of preculture in hydroponics, roots
of intact plants were rinsed with deionized water and transferred to a
pretreatment solution containing 0.5 mM CaCl2
and 5 mM MES with pH adjusted to 6.0. Twelve hours later
and when the light period had already started for 2 h, the
pretreatment solution was replaced with 240 mL of uptake solution
containing either 5 µM arsenate
(Na2HAsO4) or 5 µM arsenite
(NaAsO2), together with 0.5 mM
CaCl2 and 5 mM MES with pH adjusted to 6.0. The
uptake solution was aerated vigorously and continuously. At 0, 15, and 30 min and thereafter every 30 min at intervals up to 8 h, 0.3 mL
of uptake solution was removed for the determination of As concentration, and replaced with 0.3 mL of deionized water. Water losses through transpiration were compensated by additions of deionized
water at hourly intervals. The temperature was maintained at
25°C ± 0.5°C. After 8 h, roots were separated from
shoots, rinsed with deionized water, blotted dry, and weighed. The
concentration of As in the uptake solution was determined using atomic
absorption spectroscopy (4100ZL, Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA) equipped with a flow injection hydride
generation unit (FIAS 400, Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems), after a
prereduction step using KI and ascorbic acid. The instrument has a
detection limit for As in solution of 0.1 µg L 1,
equivalent to 0.05 µM As in the uptake solution. Dried
plant tissues were ground and digested with
HNO3/HClO4, and the concentration of As
determined using ICP-atomic emission spectroscopy.
The depletion experiment was carried out for both arsenate and arsenite
under three different treatments: (a) control, in which P-sufficient
plants were used and the uptake solution contained no phosphate; (b)
control + P, in which P-sufficient plants were used and the uptake
solution contained 50 µM phosphate
(Na2HPO4); and (c) P deficient, in which
P-deficient plants were used by withholding P supply for 8 d
before the uptake experiment, and the uptake solution contained no
phosphate. Each treatment was replicated 5-fold.
Where possible, a modified Michaelis-Menten kinetic model (Eq. 1) was
fitted to the depletion data, according to Claassen and Barber
(1974) and Drew et al. (1984) :
|
(1)
|
where I is the net influx, expressed as nmol
g 1 root fresh weight h 1;
Imax is the maximum net influx at saturating
concentrations; Km is the ion concentration
when I = 1/2 Imax; and Cmin is
the minimal ion concentration below which net influx ceases.
As Speciation in P. vittata Fronds
After a 3-week preculture in hydroponics, P.
vittata (from Oxford) plants were given either 50 µM arsenate (Na2HAsO4) or 50 µM arsenite (NaAsO2). The composition of
other nutrients was the same as in the preculture, except that the
phosphate concentration was decreased to 100 µM. The
nutrient solution was topped up every day and renewed every week. Each
treatment was replicated in three pots. After a 2-week exposure to As,
plants were separated into roots and fronds, and washed with deionized
water. For the As speciation, the fronds were crushed mechanically with
a homogenizer in a suspension of 30 mM ammonium phosphate
buffer at pH 5.6 (about 150 mg fresh weight mL 1). After
20 min, the suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was stored
at 4°C overnight. This solution was analyzed after being diluted with
the buffer (1:70-1:100 [v/v]) and filtered through a 0.45-µm
filter for its total As content by ICP-MS (Spectromass 2000, Spectro
Analytical Instruments) directly, and for the As speciation by SEC and
AEC. Quantitative determination of As in frond extracts and in the acid
digests (microwave digestion for 10 min at 100% power with
concentrated suprapur HNO3) was carried out with external
calibration of the ICP-MS with arsenate standards. The As content in
the standard reference material IAEA 140 (seaweed) was determined to be
42 ± 1 mg kg 1 (reference value of 42.2-46.4 mg
kg 1).
The analytical setup for As speciation analysis consisted of two
HPLC pumps (LKB, Bromma, Sweden), one for the separation and the
other for the post-column addition of a cesium solution (20 µg
L 1) as continuous internal standard. The outlet of the
separation column was mixed with the standard solution via a "T"
piece and then directly connected to a Meinhard nebulizer (GE Meinhard
Assoc., Inc., Santa Ana, CA) and a water-jacketed cyclonic spray
chamber of the ICP-MS. The ICP-MS was set up for the collection of
transient signals for 75, 77, and 133 m/z
with a dwell time of 500 ms to monitor As, a possible chloride
interference (ArCl), and the internal standard cesium. The ICP-MS was
optimized daily with an As standard solution (10 µg
L 1). For the SEC, Asahipak GS 220 (250 × 7.5 mm,
Showa, Denko K.K., Tokyo) with a sample loop of 20 µL was
used. The same buffer as employed for extraction was used (30 mM ammonium phosphate buffer, pH 5.6) and pumped at 1 L
min 1 through the system. For the anion-exchange
chromatography, a PRPX 100 Hamilton (150 × 4.6 mm) + pre-column
was used with 20 mM ammonium carbonate buffer (pH 8.08) as
the mobile phase at 1 mL min 1. Comparisons of both
retention times (SEC and AEC) with standards were used for peak
identification and quantification was done by measuring peak areas of
the individual species.
The buffer was prepared from suprapur phosphoric acid and ammonia (25%
[w/v] suprapur) or ammonium carbonate. For speciation, As(III)
was prepared from As2O3, As(V) was prepared
from Na3AsO4, DMA(V) was prepared from Na-DMA,
MMA(V) was prepared from Na2-MMA (a kind donation from
Prof. William R. Cullen, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, Canada), and DMA(III) and MMA(III) were reduced from their
pentavalent forms using thiosulfate and bisulfite according to the
method of Reay and Asher (1977) . All chemicals used were of the
analytical grade or better, and were from BDH (Poole, UK), and
deionized water was used throughout.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Dr. Lena Ma (University of Florida), Kate Pritchard
(University of Oxford Botanic Garden), and Dr. Jackie Barker (IACR-Long
Ashton) for providing spores of P. vittata, and Miss Sarah Dunham for technical assistance. J. Wang thanks China Scholarship Council for a one-year fellowship.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received May 7, 2002; returned for revision June 19, 2002; accepted July 13, 2002.
1
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and
Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK (grant to Rothamsted Research).
2
Present address: Life Science College,
Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling,
Shaanxi 712100, China.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail Fangjie.Zhao{at}bbsrc.ac.uk; fax
44-1582-760981.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.008185.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Abedin MJ, Feldmann J, Meharg AA
(2002)
Uptake kinetics of arsenic species in rice plants.
Plant Physiol
128: 1120-1128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Asher CJ, Reay PF
(1979)
Arsenic uptake by barley seedlings.
Aust J Plant Physiol
6: 459-466
-
Burló F, Guijarro I, Carbonell-Barrachina AA, Valero D, Martinez-Sánchez F
(1999)
Arsenic species: effects on and accumulation by tomato plants.
J Agric Food Chem
47: 1247-1253[Medline]
-
Claassen N, Barber SA
(1974)
A method for characterizing the relation between nutrient concentration and flux into roots of intact plants.
Plant Physiol
54: 564-568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Drew MC, Saker LR, Barber SA, Jenkins W
(1984)
Changes in the kinetics of phosphate and potassium absorption in nutrient-deficient barley roots measured by a solution-depletion technique.
Planta
160: 490-499[CrossRef]
-
Francesconi K, Visoottiviseth P, Sridokchan W, Goessler W
(2002)
Arsenic species in an arsenic hyperaccumulating fern, Pityrogramma calomelanos: a potential phytoremediator of arsenic-contaminated soils.
Sci Total Environ
284: 27-35[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Geiszinger A, Goessler W, Kosmus W
(2002)
Organoarsenic compounds in plants and soil on top of an ore vein.
Appl Organomet Chem
16: 245-249[CrossRef]
-
Hartley-Whitaker J, Ainsworth G, Vooijs R, Ten Bookum W, Schat H, Meharg AA
(2001)
Phytochelatins are involved in differential arsenate tolerance in Holcus lanatus.
Plant Physiol
126: 299-306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hewitt EJ
(1966)
Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition, Ed 2. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Bucks, UK
-
Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H
(1992)
Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, Ed 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
-
Lee RB
(1982)
Selectivity and kinetics of ion uptake by barley plants following nutrient deficiency.
Ann Bot
50: 429-449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu CM, Muchhal US, Uthappa M, Kononowicz AK, Raghothama KG
(1998)
Tomato phosphate transporter genes are differentially regulated in plant tissues by phosphorus.
Plant Physiol
116: 91-99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lombi E, Zhao FJ, Fuhrmann M, Ma LQ, McGrath SP (2002)
Arsenic distribution and speciation in the fronds of the
hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. New Phytol (in press)
-
Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, Zhang WH, Cai Y, Kennelley ED
(2001)
A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic: a hardy, versatile, fast-growing plant helps to remove arsenic from contaminated soils.
Nature
409: 579-579[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Marin AR, Masscheleyn PH, Patrick WH
(1992)
The influence of chemical form and concentration of arsenic on rice growth and tissue arsenic concentration.
Plant Soil
139: 175-183[CrossRef]
-
McGrath SP, Zhao FJ, Lombi E
(2002)
Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides.
Adv Agron
75: 1-56
-
Meharg AA, Hartley-Whitaker J
(2002)
Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species.
New Phytol
154: 29-43[CrossRef]
-
Meharg AA, Macnair MR
(1991)
The mechanisms of arsenate tolerance in Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) Beauv and Agrostis capillaris L.
New Phytol
119: 291-297[CrossRef]
-
Meharg AA, Macnair MR
(1992)
Suppression of the high-affinity phosphate uptake system: a mechanism of arsenate tolerance in Holcus lanatus L.
J Exp Bot
43: 519-524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Meharg AA, Naylor J, Macnair MR
(1994)
Phosphorus nutrition of arsenate tolerant and nontolerant phenotypes of velvetgrass.
J Environ Qual
23: 234-238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muchhal US, Pardo JM, Raghothama KG
(1996)
Phosphate transporters from the higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93: 10519-10523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muchhal US, Raghothama KG
(1999)
Transcriptional regulation of plant phosphate transporters.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96: 5868-5872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pickering IJ, Prince RC, George MJ, Smith RD, George GN, Salt DE
(2000)
Reduction and coordination of arsenic in Indian mustard.
Plant Physiol
122: 1171-1177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reay PF, Asher CJ
(1977)
Preparation and purification of 74As-labeled arsenate and arsenite for use in biological experiments.
Anal Biochem
78: 557-560[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Schmöger MEV, Oven M, Grill E
(2000)
Detoxification of arsenic by phytochelatins in plants.
Plant Physiol
122: 793-801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith E, Naidu R, Alston AM
(1998)
Arsenic in the soil environment: a review.
Adv Agron
64: 149-195
-
Smith FW, Ealing PM, Dong B, Delhaize E
(1997)
The cloning of two Arabidopsis genes belonging to a phosphate transporter family.
Plant J
11: 83-92[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Sneller FEC, Van Heerwaarden LM, Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Ten Bookum WM, Koevoets PLM, Schat H, Verkleij JAC
(1999)
Toxicity of arsenate in Silene vulgaris, accumulation and degradation of arsenate-induced phytochelatins.
New Phytol
144: 223-232[CrossRef]
-
Tu C, Ma LQ
(2002)
Effects of arsenic concentrations and forms on arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator ladder brake.
J Environ Qual
31: 641-647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ullrich-Eberius CI, Sanz A, Novacky AJ
(1989)
Evaluation of arsenate- and vanadate-associated changes of electrical membrane potential and phosphate transport in Lemna gibba-G1.
J Exp Bot
40: 119-128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wysocki R, Chery CC, Wawrzycka D, Van Hulle M, Cornelis R, Thevelein JM, Tamas MJ
(2001)
The glycerol channel Fps1p mediates the uptake of arsenite and antimonite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol Microbiol
40: 1391-1401[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP
(2002)
Arsenic hyperaccumulation by different fern species.
New Phytol
156: 27-31[CrossRef]
© 2002 American Society of Plant Biologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kupper, B. Gotz, A. Mijovilovich, F. C. Kupper, and W. Meyer-Klaucke
Complexation and Toxicity of Copper in Higher Plants. I. Characterization of Copper Accumulation, Speciation, and Toxicity in Crassula helmsii as a New Copper Accumulator
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2009;
151(2):
702 - 714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-G. ZHU, C.-N. GENG, Y.-P. TONG, S. E. SMITH, and F. A. SMITH
Phosphate (Pi) and Arsenate Uptake by Two Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars and Their Doubled Haploid Lines
Ann. Bot.,
September 1, 2006;
98(3):
631 - 636.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Santos, M. Gaspar, A. Caeiro, C. Branco-Price, A. Teixeira, and R. B. Ferreira
Exposure of Lemna minor to Arsenite: Expression Levels of the Components and Intermediates of the Ubiquitin/Proteasome Pathway
Plant Cell Physiol.,
September 1, 2006;
47(9):
1262 - 1273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Ellis, L. Gumaelius, E. Indriolo, I. J. Pickering, J. A. Banks, and D. E. Salt
A Novel Arsenate Reductase from the Arsenic Hyperaccumulating Fern Pteris vittata
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2006;
141(4):
1544 - 1554.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. P. Dhankher, B. P. Rosen, E. C. McKinney, and R. B. Meagher
Hyperaccumulation of arsenic in the shoots of Arabidopsis silenced for arsenate reductase (ACR2)
PNAS,
April 4, 2006;
103(14):
5413 - 5418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Al Agely, D. M. Sylvia, and L. Q. Ma
Mycorrhizae Increase Arsenic Uptake by the Hyperaccumulator Chinese Brake Fern (Pteris vittata L.)
J. Environ. Qual.,
November 7, 2005;
34(6):
2181 - 2186.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-L. Duan, Y.-G. Zhu, Y.-P. Tong, C. Cai, and R. Kneer
Characterization of Arsenate Reductase in the Extract of Roots and Fronds of Chinese Brake Fern, an Arsenic Hyperaccumulator
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2005;
138(1):
461 - 469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gumaelius, B. Lahner, D. E. Salt, and J. A. Banks
Arsenic Hyperaccumulation in Gametophytes of Pteris vittata. A New Model System for Analysis of Arsenic Hyperaccumulation
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2004;
136(2):
3198 - 3208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Raab, J. Feldmann, and A. A. Meharg
The Nature of Arsenic-Phytochelatin Complexes in Holcus lanatus and Pteris cretica
Plant Physiology,
March 1, 2004;
134(3):
1113 - 1122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|