Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.

Plant Physiol, December 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 1739-1740

ON THE INSIDE



    Cow Flops, Compost, and Proton Pumping in Maize (Zea mays)
TOP
Cow Flops, Compost, and...
Insights into a "Mystery...
Gene Expression Analysis of...
Gene Expression during Maize...
How Grass Disease Resistance...
Cell Wall Oligosaccharide...

Earthworm (Eisenia foetida) compost enhances soil fertility by increasing the availability of nutrients and improving the soil's structure and water-holding capacity (Fig. 1). In the process of hastening decomposition, earthworms also produce several bioactive humic substances that exhibit auxin-like activity and which improve plant nutrition and growth. Humic acids (HAs), macromolecules consisting mainly of long alkyl chains containing aromatic groups, comprise one of the major fractions of humic substances. The mechanism underlying their auxin-like activity remains unsettled. Auxins stimulate plant growth by inducing an increase in the amount of plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Activation of the H+-ATPase also improves plant nutrition by enhancing the electrochemical proton gradient that drives ion transport across the cell membrane via secondary transport systems. Could HAs be acting by a similar mechanism? In this issue, Canellas et al. (pp. 1951-1957) investigate the effects of HAs isolated from cattle manure earthworm compost on the earliest stages of lateral root development (an auxin-regulated process) and on the plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity. HAs are found to enhance the root growth of maize seedlings in conjunction with a marked proliferation of sites of lateral root emergence. They also stimulate the plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity, apparently by promoting the expression of this H+-pumping protein. In addition, structural analyses reveal the presence of exchangeable auxin groups in the macrostructure of the earthworm compost HA. The stimulatory effect of HA may be triggered by an association of HAs with specific receptors on the cell surface or may involve the release of small bioactive molecules from the HA macrostructure.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Earthworm compost produces humic acid, which up-regulates the proton pump of maize roots.


    Insights into a "Mystery Organelle"
TOP
Cow Flops, Compost, and...
Insights into a "Mystery...
Gene Expression Analysis of...
Gene Expression during Maize...
How Grass Disease Resistance...
Cell Wall Oligosaccharide...

Researchers have long been aware of a mysterious organelle, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) body, in the cells of various Brassicaceae, including Arabidopsis (Fig. 2). Fluorescent imaging of ER bodies by green fluorescent protein with an ER retention signal has provided new insights into the distribution and possible roles of these rod-shaped structures that are characteristically 5 µm long and 0.5 µm wide. Electron microscopic studies revealed that ER bodies have a fibrous pattern inside, are derived from ER, and are surrounded by ribosomes. Immunocytochemical analysis showed that ER bodies contain precursors of two Cys proteinases, RD21 and gamma VPE. Both RD21 and gamma VPE are vacuolar proteinases that are induced by environmental stresses. During salt-induced cell death, ER bodies fuse with each other and with lytic vacuoles, thereby mediating the delivery of the proteinase precursors directly into the vacuoles. These findings suggest that ER bodies are a proteinase-sorting system that assists Brassicacean cells under various stress conditions. In this issue, Matsushima et al. (pp. 1807-1814) report that wounding and treatment with methyl jasmonate (MeJa) induce many ER bodies in the rosette leaves of Arabidopsis, which have no ER bodies under normal conditions. The induction of ER bodies by MeJa is suppressed by ethylene. An experiment using coi1 and etr1-4 mutant plants shows that the induction of ER bodies was strictly coupled with the signal transduction of MeJa and ethylene. These results suggest that the formation of ER bodies is a novel and unique type of endomembrane system in the Brassicaceae and that it is involved in the responses of certain cells to environmental stress.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Fluorescent imaging of Arabidopsis ER reveals unique, rod-shaped bodies (ER bodies) that are produced in response to stress.


    Gene Expression Analysis of Al Stress in Rye (Secale cereale)
TOP
Cow Flops, Compost, and...
Insights into a "Mystery...
Gene Expression Analysis of...
Gene Expression during Maize...
How Grass Disease Resistance...
Cell Wall Oligosaccharide...

Al is one of the most important limiting factors for crop production on acid soils such as those that often occur in the tropics. With the goal of identifying novel genes regulated by Al stress, Milla et al. (pp. 1706-1716) employed an expressed sequence tag (EST) approach to analyze Al-induced changes in gene expression in roots of an Al-tolerant rye (Secale cereale) cultivar. In total, 1,968 sequences were obtained, and ESTs showing significant homology to proteins of known function were functionally classified. Comparison of the data sets from non-stressed and stressed libraries revealed many previously reported Al-responsive genes as well as 13 genes which hitherto have not been implicated in Al stress. Among the more significant findings from this study were the rapid down-regulation by Al stress of tonoplast aquaporins (involved in cell elongation), and the late induction of the ubiquitin-like protein SMT3 gene (involved in the control and recovery of the cell cycle). In addition, the results suggest that glutathione-dependent systems provide the most important antioxidant defense in root apices under Al stress, whereas ascorbate-related systems seem to be negatively affected. The strong and complex effects of Al stress on several genes involved in the control of Fe uptake and homeostasis suggest an important role of this mechanism during the response of plants to Al, possibly in connection to oxidative stress. Other novel Al-induced genes (pathogenesis-related protein 1.2, heme oxygenase, and epoxide hydrolase) require further research to determine where they fit into the overall response of Al-tolerant plants to toxic levels of Al.


    Gene Expression during Maize Pollen Maturation
TOP
Cow Flops, Compost, and...
Insights into a "Mystery...
Gene Expression Analysis of...
Gene Expression during Maize...
How Grass Disease Resistance...
Cell Wall Oligosaccharide...

Generally, in male-sterile plant mutants, including the S-type cytoplasmic male sterility (S-CMS) of maize, pollen inviability is associated with starch deficiency. Pollen maturation appears to be prematurely terminated if starch levels remain lower than a certain threshold. The pollen (the gametophyte) itself controls starch deposition. Datta et al. (pp. 1645-1656) took advantage of the failure of S-CMS pollen to "fill" during the last stages of maturation to help elucidate, by comparison with wild-type pollen, what genes are expressed during this critical stage of pollen development. As expected, male-fertile pollen, but not the CMS starch-deficient genotypes, showed changes in the expression patterns of a large number of genes during the "filling" stage of pollen development. In addition to a battery of housekeeping genes necessary for carbohydrate metabolism, they observed changes in hexose transporter, plasma membrane H+-ATPase, ZmMADS1, and 14-3-3 proteins. Collectively, the data suggest that the combined effects of both reduced levels of sugars and their reduced flux into starch biosynthesis may lead to the observed temporal changes in gene expressions, and ultimately to pollen sterility.


    How Grass Disease Resistance (R) Genes Evolve
TOP
Cow Flops, Compost, and...
Insights into a "Mystery...
Gene Expression Analysis of...
Gene Expression during Maize...
How Grass Disease Resistance...
Cell Wall Oligosaccharide...

Plants employ hundreds of disease resistance genes to defend against a wide variety of pathogens and pests. The most abundant class of R genes encodes proteins with a nucleotide-binding site and a Leu-rich repeat (LRR) region. The LRR region apparently enables the protein to recognize specific pathogen gene products and to initiate several defense pathways. Because pathogens can easily become virulent by loss of features that allow their recognition, R genes must evolve rapidly to keep pace with evolving pathogen populations. From an evolutionary perspective, it would be interesting to perform a comparative analysis of DNA sequences from orthologous, R gene-containing chromosomal regions from two closely related species. Such studies might shed light on the mechanisms by which R genes are able to evolve so quickly, and whether these same mechanisms are used by different species. One well-studied R gene is Rp1, a complex disease resistance locus in maize that confers resistance to common leaf rust (Puccinia sorghi). In this issue, Ramakrishna et al. (pp. 1728-1738) sequenced a contiguous 268 kb of the Rp1-orthologous region in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to determine the structural variation of an R gene cluster that has diverged since the ancestral divergence of maize and sorghum about 15 to 20 million years ago. The maize and sorghum orthologous Rp1 regions share numerous structural features, but all involve events that occurred independently in each species. The data suggest that complex disease resistance gene clusters are unusually prone to frequent internal and adjacent chromosomal rearrangements of several types.


    Cell Wall Oligosaccharide Fingerprinting
TOP
Cow Flops, Compost, and...
Insights into a "Mystery...
Gene Expression Analysis of...
Gene Expression during Maize...
How Grass Disease Resistance...
Cell Wall Oligosaccharide...

The selection of mutant plants with altered cell wall composition provides new opportunities to study the functions of cell wall polysaccharides and to identify the gene(s) encoding enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of cell wall components. In this issue, Lerouxel et al. (pp. 1754-1763) describe the use of various enzymatic-fingerprinting methods that allow the rapid and detailed structural analysis of cell wall polysaccharides. To demonstrate the feasibility of the techniques, the researchers focused on the analysis of xyloglucans, the most abundant hemicellulose present in the primary cell walls of most plants. Of the three techniques tested, the most impressive results were obtained using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The spectra generated by this technique take less than a minute to make, allowing for the rapid screening of a vast number of plants. The authors were able to record reproducible MALDI-TOF MS spectra on xyloglucan fragment pools released from a single Arabidopsis seedling. Applied to mur mutants, the automated analysis was able to select not only strongly affected xyloglucan mur1-mur3 mutants harboring side-chains alterations, but also less obviously affected mutants such as mur11. The automated and high-throughput methods presented can easily be adopted for the analysis of other wall polysaccharides.

    FOOTNOTES

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.900056.

Peter V. Minorsky

Department of Natural Sciences
Mercy College
Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522

© 2002 American Society of Plant Biologists




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Plant Biologists