|
Plant Physiol, December 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 1745-1746
THE HOT AND THE CLASSIC
 |
ALLELOPATHY AND GRAIN CROP PRODUCTION |
Allelopathy is the direct
influence of a chemical released from one living plant on the
development and growth of another. Many researchers have speculated
that allelopathy might prove useful in controlling weeds and increasing
grain yields. Selection for genotypes with enhanced allelopathic
potentials has been carried out in several field crops, and evidence
has accumulated that crop cultivars differ significantly in their
ability to inhibit the growth of certain weed species. Although
traditional breeding methods have not been successful in producing
highly allelopathic grain crops with good yields, genetic engineering
has the potential for overcoming this impasse (Duke et al.,
2001 ). Conceivably, genetic engineers could enhance
the production of allelochemicals already present in a crop or impart
the ability to produce new compounds. With either strategy, there are
potential problems that must be overcome with regard to tissue-specific
promoters, autotoxicity, metabolic imbalances, and proper movement of
the allelopathic compound to the rhizosphere. Thus, there is a
considerable amount of research to do in all the subdisciplines
surrounding this problem. This article highlights some recent
developments in this field.
 |
Rice (Oryza sativa) |
Allelopathic rice germplasm has been identified in laboratory
and greenhouse screenings. Rice cultivars of high allelopathic potential can suppress both mono- and dicot weed species. Field experiments revealed that allelopathy accounted for 34% of the overall
competitive ability in rice. Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) have been
developed for the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL)
controlling allelopathy (Olofsdotter et al., 2002a ).
The allelochemicals responsible for the growth inhibition of
rice-associated weeds, however, have not yet been identified for
certain. Several putative allelochemicals are found in extracts of rice
leaf and straw, decomposing straw, and in rice soils. Although phenolic acids are often mentioned as putative
allelochemicals, this idea has recently been criticized
(Olofsdotter et al., 2002b ). Phenolic acids
concentrations are normally greater in submerged than in aerobic
soils. A dose-response study, however, showed that seedlings of rice
cultivars adapted to submerged anaerobic soils did not have a higher
level of tolerance against p-hydroxybenzoic acid than
did seedlings of varieties adapted to aerobic upland soils. Moreover,
the rates at which rice plants released phenolic acids into solution
cultures was calculated to be insufficient for attaining phytotoxic
levels in the soil. Phenolic acids might be just one component in a
mixture of chemicals that, when present simultaneously, are
allelopathic (Olofsdotter et al., 2002b ). Kato-Noguchi
et al. (2002) have presented evidence that momilactone B
may play an important role in rice allelopathy.
 |
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) |
Both wheat residue and wheat seedling allelopathy are
being studied for their possible utilization in weed management. Wheat varieties differ greatly in their allelopathic potential against weeds.
Wu et al. (2000) evaluated wheat seedling
allelopathy against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum)
in a collection of 453 wheat accessions originating from 50 countries. The effectiveness of different accessions in their ability
to inhibit root growth of ryegrass ranged from 10% to 91%. Wheat
allelopathic activity was normally distributed within the collection,
indicating the involvement of multiple genes conferring the
allelopathic trait. Thus, there is considerable genetic variation of
allelopathic activity in wheat germplasm, and it may be possible to
breed for cultivars with enhanced allelopathy for weed suppression.
Several categories of allelochemicals for wheat allelopathy have been
identified, including phenolic acids, hydroxamic acids, and
short-chain fatty acids (Wu et al., 2001a ). Wu et
al. (2001b) have implicated
2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one as another important
allelochemical in wheat. Research is under way to identify genetic
markers associated with wheat allelopathy. Wheat allelopathic activity
is genetically controlled, and a multigenic model has been proposed
(Wu et al., 2001a ).
Allelopathy is also of agricultural importance because of the
phenomenon of autotoxicity -a type of intraspecific allelopathy, where
a plant species inhibits the growth of its own kind through the release
of toxic chemicals into the environment (Singh et al.,
1999 ). This phenomenon causes "soil sickness," particularly in semi-arid climates, where the soil "cleansing" affects of
rainfall are less frequent. The negative impacts of wheat autotoxicity on agricultural production systems have also been identified when wheat
straws are retained on the soil surface for conservation farming
purposes (Wu et al., 2001a ).
 |
Maize (Zea mays) |
Allelopathy in maize has attracted less attention than
allelopathy in rice or wheat. An important clue toward identifying the
allelochemicals of maize is that the allelopathic potential of maize
seedlings is enhanced by visible light. Kato-Noguchi (1999) found six substances with inhibitory activity in
the acetone extract of germinating maize seedlings. One of these
substances, identified as 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIBOA)
was higher in light-grown maize than in dark grown. At concentrations
greater than 0.03 mM, DIBOA inhibited the growth of roots
and hypocotyls of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seedlings.
The concentrations of DIBOA in the light-grown maize seedlings and
their root exudates were 43 and 0.38 µmol kg 1 fresh
weight, respectively, and concentrations in the dark-grown seedlings
and their root exudates were 19 and 0.17 µmol kg 1 fresh
weight, respectively. The level of DIBOA in the dark-grown seedlings
increased rapidly upon visible light irradiation. These results suggest
that visible light may enhance allelopathic activity of germinating
maize due to an increase in the level of DIBOA.
 |
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) |
Allelopathy by sorghum frequently harms wheat and
peanuts (Arachis hypogea) when these crops are grown in
rotation with sorghum. Much recent research has focused on cultivation
techniques that may reduce allelopathic residues left by previous
sorghum crops. Roth et al. (2000) found that prompt
tillage of the mature sorghum stalks delayed development of the
following wheat crop but did not affect grain yields, probably because
allelopathic compounds degraded in the soil. No-till sorghum stover had
little effect on stand establishment but frequently reduced grain
yields of wheat, possibly because allelopathic compounds leached
slowly. However, if erosion of soil is not a concern, allelopathy might be reduced by prompt tillage and other practices that promote rapid
decomposition of sorghum stover. Sene et al. (2000)
found that peanut seedling establishment was better between rows than on rows of previous sorghum crop. They proposed a geometrical sowing
pattern for peanuts between the rows of the previous sorghum crop to
escape the latter's "allelopathic heritage." They also examined
the phenolic content of the row and interrow soils but did not find
consistent data from year to year, suggesting possibly that phenolics
are not the principal compounds responsible for sorghum allelopathy.
Although the introduction of sorghum into a crop rotation is
often detrimental to crop yield, sorghum allelopathy, of course, does
not only hinder the "good" plants in the fields: It also hinders
many weeds. Paradoxically, if the weeds are inhibited by sorghum's
allelochemical heritage more than the crops are, the crop plants can
actually prosper because of the reduced competition by weeds. Thus,
sorghum allelochemicals are actually used as a natural herbicide called
sorgaab (a water extract of mature sorghum plants obtained after
soaking in water for 24 h). Cheema and Khaliq (2000) , for example, found that sorgaab applications
reduced weeds by 35% to 49% and increased wheat yield by 10% to
21%.
 |
Barley (Hordeum vulgare) |
Autotoxicity has been found to be a problem in at least
one cultivar of barley grown in Tunisia. Ben-Hammouda et al.
(2001) reported that this same cultivar of barley was autotoxic
to other cultivars of barley, though not to itself. Leaves were the
most important source of allelopathic substances. This same cultivar of
barley was also found to be phytotoxic to durum wheat (Triticum durum) and bread wheat (T. aestivum). Seedling
growth bioassays demonstrated that the two wheat species responded
differently to the allelopathic potential of barley with a greater
sensitivity shown by the bread wheats. For both wheat species, radicle
growth was more depressed than coleoptile growth, though stimulation of
seedling growth was observed for durum wheat. Leaves and roots were the
most phytotoxic barley plant parts for durum and bread wheats,
respectively. Results suggested that the response by durum wheat and
bread wheat varied depending on the source of allelochemicals (i.e.
plant part) and the growth stage of the barley plant. Consequently, barley should be considered a depressive prior crop for both durum wheat and bread wheat in a field cropping sequence.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.900057.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Ben-Hammouda M, Ghorbal H, Kremer RJ, Oueslati O
(2001)
Allelopathic effects of barley extracts on germination and seedlings growth of bread and durum wheats.
Agronomie
21: 65-71
-
Ben-Hammouda M, Ghorbal H, Kremer RJ, Oueslatt O
(2002)
Autotoxicity of barley.
J Plant Nutr
25: 1155-1161[CrossRef]
-
Cheema ZA, Khaliq A
(2000)
Use of sorghum allelopathic properties to control weeds in irrigated wheat in a semi arid region of Punjab.
Agric Ecosyst Environ
79: 105-112[CrossRef]
-
Duke SO, Scheffler BE, Dayan FE, Weston LA, Ota E
(2001)
Strategies for using transgenes to produce allelopathic crops.
Weed Technol
15: 826-834
-
Kato-Noguchi H
(1999)
Effect of light-irradiation on allelopathic potential of germinating maize.
Phytochemistry
52: 1023-1027[CrossRef]
-
Kato-Noguchi H, Ino T, Sata N, Yamamura S
(2002)
Isolation and identification of a potent allelopathic substance in rice root exudates.
Physiol Plant
115: 401-405[Medline]
-
Olofsdotter M, Jensen LB, Courtois B
(2002a)
Improving crop competitive ability using allelopathy
an example from rice.
Plant Breed
121: 1-9[CrossRef] -
Olofsdotter M, Rebulanan M, Madrid A, Wang DL, Navarez D, Olk DC
(2002b)
Why phenolic acids are unlikely primary allelochemicals in rice.
J Chem Ecol
28: 229-242[Medline]
-
Roth CM, Shroyer JP, Paulsen GM
(2000)
Allelopathy of sorghum on wheat under several tillage systems.
Agron J
92: 855-860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sene M, Dore T, Pellissier F
(2000)
Effect of phenolic acids in soil under and between rows of a prior sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) crop on germination, emergence, and seedling growth of peanut (Arachis hypogea).
J Chem Ecol
26: 625-637[CrossRef]
-
Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK
(1999)
Autotoxicity: concept, organisms, and ecological significance.
Crit Rev Plant Sci
18: 757-772[CrossRef]
-
Wu H, Pratley J, Lemerle D, Haig T
(2000)
Evaluation of seedling allelopathy in 453 wheat (Triticum aestivum) accessions against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) by the equal-compartment-agar method.
Austral J Agric Res
51: 937-944[CrossRef]
-
Wu H, Pratley J, Lemerle D, Haig T
(2001a)
Allelopathy in wheat (Triticum aestivum).
Ann Appl Biol
139: 1-9
-
Wu HW, Haig T, Pratley J, Lemerle D, An M
(2001b)
Allelochemicals in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): production and exudation of 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one.
J Chem Ecol
27: 1691-1700[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Peter V. Minorsky
Department of Natural Sciences Mercy College Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522
© 2002 American Society of Plant Biologists
|
|