First published online November 14, 2002; 10.1104/pp.008581
Plant Physiol, December 2002, Vol. 130, pp. 2085-2094
Differential Regulation of RNA Levels of Gibberellin Dioxygenases
by Photoperiod in Spinach1
Dong Ju
Lee and
Jan A.D.
Zeevaart*
Department of Energy-Plant Research Laboratory (D.J.L., J.A.D.Z.),
and Department of Plant Biology (J.A.D.Z.), Michigan State University,
East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312
 |
ABSTRACT |
Previous work with spinach (Spinacia oleracea) has
shown that the level of gibberellin (GA) 20-oxidase is strongly
up-regulated by long days (LD). In the present work, the effect of
photoperiod on expression of other GA dioxygenases was investigated and
compared with that of GA 20-oxidase. Two GA 2-oxidases and one GA
3-oxidase were isolated from spinach by reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction with degenerate primers and by
5'- and 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends. As determined by
high-performance liquid chromatography with on-line radioactivity
detection, the SoGA3ox1 gene product catalyzed
3 -hydroxylation of GA9 to GA4 and
GA20 to GA1. The SoGA2ox1 and
the SoGA2ox2 gene products catalyzed 2 -hydroxylation
of GA9 to GA51 and GA20 to
GA29. The product of GA20 metabolism by
SoGA3ox1 was identified as GA1 by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, whereas the products of GA1 and
GA20 metabolism by SoGA2ox1 and SoGA2ox2 were identified as
GA8 and GA29, respectively. SoGA2ox1 also
metabolized GA53 to GA97. The levels of
SoGA20ox1 transcripts were greatly increased in all
organs tested in LD conditions, but the levels of
SoGA3ox1 transcripts were only slightly increased in
blades and petioles. A decrease in the levels of the
SoGA2ox1 transcripts in young leaves and tips in LD
conditions is opposite to the expression pattern of the
SoGA20ox1. Expression of SoGA20ox1 in
petioles and young leaves was strongly up-regulated by a supplementary
16 h of light, but the levels of SoGA3ox1 and SoGA2ox1 transcripts did not change. It is concluded
that regulation and maintenance of GA1 concentration in
spinach are primarily attributable to changes in expression of
SoGA20ox1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Long-day (LD) rosette plants, such
as spinach (Spinacia oleracea), grow vegetatively and do not
produce a stem when grown under short-day (SD) conditions. Upon
transfer to LD conditions, stem elongation and flowering take place. In
spinach, LD-induced stem elongation is dependent on gibberellin
(GA)-regulated processes. There is considerable evidence that GA
biosynthesis increases in rosette plants in LD conditions
(Talon and Zeevaart, 1990 ; Talon et al.,
1991 ). The major endogenous GAs of spinach belong to the
early-13-hydroxylation pathway: GA53,
GA44, GA19,
GA20, GA1,
GA8, and GA29 (Fig.
1; Talon et al., 1991 ), of
which only GA1 is active per se (Zeevaart
et al., 1993 ). Several steps of the GA biosynthetic pathway are
regulated by photoperiod. For example, the biosynthesis of
ent-kaurene, an early step in the GA biosynthetic pathway,
is enhanced by LD (Zeevaart and Gage, 1993 ).
The later steps of sequential oxidation and elimination of C-20 of
C20-GAs
(GA53 GA44 GA19 GA20),
catalyzed by GA 20-oxidase, are also increased when spinach plants are
transferred from SD to LD conditions (Wu et al.,
1996 ).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
The early-13-hydroxylation pathway from
GA12 to GA8 of GA
biosynthesis and deactivation in spinach. GA53 is
converted to GA20 by GA 20-oxidase via
GA44 and GA19.
GA20 can be converted to
GA1 by GA 3-oxidase. GA12,
GA53, GA20, and
GA1 can be deactivated by 2 -hydroxylation to
GA110, GA97,
GA29, and GA8,
respectively.
|
|
3 -Hydroxylation is the final step to active GAs, converting
GA9 and GA20 to
GA4 and GA1, respectively.
Genes encoding 3-oxidases have been isolated from several species, and
their expression and regulation have been studied (Chiang et
al., 1995 ; Lester et al., 1997 ; Cowling
et al., 1998 ; Yamaguchi et al., 1998 ;
Itoh et al., 1999 , 2001 ; Rebers et
al., 1999 ). GA 2-oxidases introduce a 2 -hydroxyl group to
biologically active GAs and deactivate C19-GAs,
such as GA1, GA4,
GA9, and GA20
(Lester et al., 1999 ; Thomas et al.,
1999 ; Elliott et al., 2001 ). Both GA 3-oxidase and GA 2-oxidase can, therefore, directly regulate the levels of the
active GAs, GA1 and GA4,
and their immediate precursors, GA20 and
GA9, respectively (for reviews, see Hedden
and Phillips, 2000 ; Yamaguchi and Kamiya,
2000 ).
As shown in earlier work with spinach, transfer of plants from SD to LD
causes an increase in all GAs of the early-13-hydroxylation pathway,
with GA20, GA1, and
GA8 showing the largest increases (Wu et
al., 1996 ). The increase in GA20 can be
explained as being attributable to increased expression of the gene
encoding GA 20-oxidase, SoGA20ox1. However, to what extent
the levels of GA1 and GA8
are determined by photoperiodically induced changes in expression of GA
3-oxidase and GA 2-oxidase is not known. In this study, we describe the
molecular cloning of a GA 3-oxidase and two GA 2-oxidases from spinach
and the regulation of their expressions by photoperiod in comparison
with that of GA 20-oxidase. Our results indicate that expression of GA
20-oxidase1 and GA 2-oxidase1 is affected more by the photoperiod than
is expression of GA 3-oxidase1 and GA 2-oxidase2.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning of GA 3-Oxidase and GA 2-Oxidase cDNAs
Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR reactions were performed with total
RNA as a template isolated from spinach grown under SD conditions. All
combinations of degenerate primers were used in the PCR reactions with
first-strand cDNA as a template. The combination of degenerate primers
JZ418 and JZ432 (Table I) yielded a
521-bp fragment of GA 3-oxidase (data not shown). The sequence of this RT-PCR product was homologous to the GA 3-oxidase genes of Arabidopsis (Chiang et al., 1995 ) and pea (Pisum sativum;
Lester et al., 1997 ). 5'- and 3'-RACE were performed
with sequence-specific primers (JZ445 and JZ444) using the SMART RACE
cDNA Amplification Kit (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto). The coding
region of the SoGA3ox1 gene was obtained with primers JZ509
and JZ510 (Table I). The full-length cDNA clone of SoGA3ox1
(1,612 bp; accession no. AF506280) has an open reading frame (ORF) of
1,149 bp, encoding a putative protein of 382 amino acids with a 223-bp
5'-untranslated sequence and a 240-bp 3'-untranslated sequence. The
predicted protein molecular mass is 42 kD, with an pI of 8.39 (Fig.
2). Northern-blot analysis showed two
sizes of transcripts of the SoGA3ox1 gene in shoot tips
around 1.6 and 2.0 kb (data not shown). The longer transcript is
immature because it contains one intron of 361 bp. This exon/intron
structure is conserved at the same position as in other
GA3ox genes (Lester et al., 1997 ). When
compared with other GA 3-oxidases, the deduced amino acid sequence of
SoGA3ox1 belongs to the same class of enzymes and contains
certain conserved amino acid sequences, such as His-227, Asp-229, and
His-284, that may bind iron (Thomas et al., 1999 ). It
shares 33% to 56% identity with the GA 3-oxidases listed in Figure
2.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I.
Primers used for the amplification of gibberellin
dioxygenase genes from spinach
Y (C/T), N (A/T/G/C), R (A/G), S (C/G), M (A/C), H (A/T/C), D (A/G/T),
K (G/T), V (A/C/G), B (C/G/T), W (A/T).
|
|

View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Alignment of the deduced amino acid
sequences for the SoGA3ox1 gene from spinach with other GA
3-oxidases. Conserved regions are boxed in black. Asterisks indicate
the putative Fe2+-binding motif at the active
site of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (Thomas et al.,
1999 ). SoGA3ox1, GA 3-oxidase from spinach (GenBank accession
no. AF506280); NtGA3ox, GA 3-oxidase from tobacco
(Nicotiana tabacum; accession no. BAA89316); StGA3ox, GA
3-oxidase from potato (Solanum tuberosum;
accession no. AAK91507); PsGA3ox, GA 3-oxidase from garden pea (GenBank
accession no. AAC96015); AtGA3ox, GA 3-oxidase from Arabidopsis
(accession no. T51691); CmGA3ox and CmGA23ox, GA 3-oxidases from
pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo; accession nos. AAB64347 and
CAB92914); and OsGA3ox, GA 3-oxidase from rice (Oryza
sativa; accession no. BAB62072).
|
|
The primer combination JZ254 and JZ258 yielded a 236-bp fragment of GA
2-oxidase1, and JZ 254 and JZ 342 yielded a 119-bp fragment of GA
2-oxidase2 (data not shown). The sequence of each RT-PCR product was
homologous to the GA 2-oxidase genes of runner bean and Arabidopsis
(Thomas et al., 1999 ) and pea (Lester et al.,
1999 ). 5'- and 3'-RACE were performed with sequence-specific primers (JZ282 and JZ298 for GA 2-oxidase1, and JZ375 and JZ574 for GA
2-oxidase2; Table I) using the SMART RACE cDNA amplification kit (BD
Biosciences Clontech). The coding region of the SoGA2ox1 gene was obtained with primers JZ300 and JZ301 (Table I). The full-length SoGA2ox1 cDNA clone (1,229 bp, accession no.
AF506281) has an ORF of 1,014 bp and encodes a protein of 337 amino
acids with a 114-bp 5'-untranslated sequence and a 101-bp
3'-untranslated sequence. The molecular mass of the predicted protein
is 38 kD, with an pI of 8.46. The SoGA2ox1 protein shares 40% to 61%
identity with the other GA 2-oxidases listed in Figure
3. Northern-blot analysis showed that the
size of the SoGA2ox1 transcript is 1.3 kb (data not
shown).

View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Alignment of the deduced amino acid
sequences for the SoGA2ox1 and SoGA2ox2 genes
from spinach with other GA 2-oxidases. Conserved regions are boxed in
black. Asterisks indicate the putative
Fe2+-binding motif at the active site of
2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (Thomas et al.,
1999 ). SoGA2ox1 and SoGA2ox2, GA 2-oxidases from spinach
(accession nos. AF506281 and AF506282); PcGA2ox1, GA 2-oxidase from
runner bean (accession no. AT132438); PsGA2ox1 and PsGA2ox2, GA
2-oxidases from garden pea (accession nos. AF100954 and AF100955);
AtGA2ox1, AtGA2ox2, and AtGA2ox3, GA 2-oxidases from Arabidopsis
(accession nos. AJ132435, AJ132436, and AJ132437); OsGA2ox1, GA
2-oxidase from rice (accession no. BAB40934).
|
|
The full-length sequence of the second GA 2-oxidase (1,130 bp),
designated SoGA2ox2 (accession no. AF506282), contains an
ORF of 990 bp encoding a protein of 329 amino acids (36 kD) with a
113-bp 5'-untranslated sequence, and a 27-bp 3'-untranslated sequence with an pI of 7.1. The coding region of the
SoGA2ox2 gene was obtained by PCR with the
sequence-specific primers JZ619 and JZ582 (Table I). SoGA2ox2 shares
37% to 55% identity with other GA 2-oxidases listed in Figure 3 and
has a low identity (40%) with the SoGA2ox1 protein. We established by
dot-blot analysis that there is no cross-reactivity between the
SoGA2ox1 and SoGA2ox2 genes (data not
shown). Figure 3 shows the conserved regions among various GA
2-oxidases. Alignment with GA 2-oxidases from other species indicates
that the two putative GA 2-oxidases from spinach belong to the same
class of proteins and contain highly conserved amino acid sequences
that may bind iron at the active site.
Heterologous Expression in Escherichia coli
To determine that the SoGA3ox1 cDNA clone
encodes a GA 3-oxidase and that the SoGA2ox1 and
SoGA2ox2 clones encode GA 2-oxidases, each coding region was
heterologously expressed as a fusion protein of the glutathione
S-transferase fusion vector in E. coli, strain BL21p Lys21. Soluble protein extracts were used
for assays of GA 3-oxidase and GA 2-oxidase activities with several
radioactive GAs as substrates. The reaction products were separated by
reverse phase HPLC with an on-line radioactivity detector. Retention
times (Rts) of the products were compared with those of standard
14C-labeled GAs for tentative identification. The
SoGA3ox1 protein converted radioactive GA9 and
GA20 to products with Rts of 27.8 and 15.4 min,
corresponding to those of GA4 and
GA1, respectively. The product of
[14C4]GA20
(specific activity 20 µCi µmol 1) incubated
with SoGA3ox1 was identified as
[14C4]GA1
(Table II), thus demonstrating
conclusively that SoGA3ox1 encodes a GA 3-oxidase.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II.
Identification of products after incubation of
recombinant GA 2-oxidases (SoGA2ox1 and SoGA2ox2) and GA 3-oxidase
(SoGA3ox1) from spinach with different substrates
|
|
Both SoGA2ox recombinant proteins converted radioactive
GA9 and GA20 to putative
GA51 (Rt = 25.8 min) and
GA29 (Rt = 10.1 min), respectively. The
products of
[14C4]GA20
and
[2H2]GA20
metabolism were identified as
[14C4]GA29
and
[2H2]GA29,
respectively;
[2H2]GA1
was converted to
[2H2]GA8
(Table II), so that both GA20 and
GA1 are substrates for these GA 2-oxidases. In
addition to GA29, a second product (Rt = 15.0 min) was formed in incubations of GA20 with
SoGA2ox1. This product was tentatively identified as
GA29-catabolite, because [14C4]GA29
was converted by SoGA2ox1 to a product with the same Rt.
SoGA2ox1, but not SoGA2ox2, also converted GA53
(Rt = 29.3 min) to GA97 (Rt = 12.4 min;
Table II) and a second metabolite (Rt = 17.0 min), which was not
identified. Thus, it appears from these results that the substrate
specificity of the two GA 2-oxidases isolated from spinach is similar
to that of other GA 2-oxidases (Thomas et al., 1999 ;
Elliott et al., 2001 ) in that they all catalyze 2 -hydroxylation of C19-GAs, but that SoGA2ox1
is also capable of 2 -hydroxylation of the
C20-GA, GA53.
Gene Expression in SD and LD Conditions
SoGA2ox1 transcripts were barely detectable on northern
blots, so SoGA2ox1 gene expression was measured by the
quantitative RT-PCR method (Cowling et al.,
1998 ). For the PCR reaction, 29 cycles were chosen as the point
where PCR products of the SoGA2ox1 and SoActin
genes were increasing exponentially (data not shown).
To investigate how the photoperiod regulates expression of the GA
dioxygenases isolated, spinach plants grown in SD conditions were
transferred to LD conditions for 8 d. Figure
4 shows the expression patterns of four
GA dioxygenases in several organs. In SD conditions, the levels of the
SoGA20ox1 transcripts were low in blades, petioles, and
young leaves, but the SoGA20ox1 transcripts accumulated in
all organs tested, especially in petioles and tips, when spinach plants
were transferred from SD to LD conditions.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Expression patterns of the SoGA20ox1,
SoGA3ox1, SoGA2ox1, and SoGA2ox2 genes
in various organs of spinach plants grown in SD and after 8 LD.
Northern blots were prepared by separating 30 µg of total RNA of each
organ through 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels containing formaldehyde,
followed by transfer to Hybond-N+ membranes. The
blots were separately hybridized to
32P-labeled cDNAs of SoGA20ox1,
SoGA3ox1, SoGA2ox2, or SoActin. After
RT-PCR of SoGA2ox1 and SoActin, 10 µL of the
PCR reaction products were separated through 2.0% (w/v) agarose
gel by electrophoresis and hybridized to a
32P-labeled cDNA of SoGA2ox1 or
SoActin. The numbers under the blots indicate the relative
amount of each transcript after standardization using
SoActin as a loading control. The value for each gene
transcript in blades of spinach grown in SD conditions was arbitrarily
set at 1.0.
|
|
The levels of the SoGA3ox1 transcripts of plants in SD
conditions were lower in petioles and tips than in leaf blades and young leaves. There was a slight increase in SoGA3ox1
transcript levels in leaf blades and petioles when spinach plants were
transferred from SD to LD conditions, but the change in photoperiod had
very little effect on transcript level in young leaves and tips (Fig. 4), the organs where growth takes place.
The levels of the SoGA2ox1 transcripts in SD-grown plants
were lower in leaf blades than in petioles, young leaves, and tips. But
in LD conditions, the levels of the SoGA2ox1 transcripts
were lower in young leaves than in other organs. Thus, the levels of the SoGA2ox1 transcripts increased in blades and petioles
when spinach plants were transferred from SD to LD conditions. By
contrast, the level of SoGA2ox1 transcripts decreased in
young leaves and tips. This decrease in the level of
SoGA2ox1 transcripts in young leaves and tips in LD
conditions is opposite to the increase in the level of
SoGA20ox1 transcripts.
The SoGA2ox2 gene was highly expressed in leaf blades and
petioles. However, there were no significant differences between transcript levels in SD and LD, so that expression of
SoGA2ox2 was not further investigated in subsequent experiments.
Time Course of LD Treatment
Spinach plants were harvested at different time intervals after
transfer from SD to LD conditions to determine the time course of
changes in gene expression. The levels of the SoGA20ox1,
SoGA3ox1, and SoGA2ox1 transcripts were all
up-regulated in petioles in a time-dependent manner (Fig.
5A). This enhancement was much stronger in the case of the SoGA20ox1 gene (26×) than of the
SoGA3ox1 gene (1.6×) and of the SoGA2ox1 gene
(4×). The levels of the SoGA20ox1 transcripts were also
increased time-dependently in young leaves and tips (Fig. 5, B and C).
LD conditions caused more rapid accumulation of the
SoGA20ox1 transcripts in tips than in petioles and young leaves. However, the SoGA3ox1 mRNA abundance in young leaves
and tips was similar or only slightly increased by the LD treatment (Fig. 5, B and C). By contrast, the levels of the SoGA2ox1
transcripts were down-regulated in young leaves and tips (Fig. 5, B and
C). The levels of the SoGA2ox1 transcripts were more rapidly
decreased in young leaves than in tips. This rapid decrease may
compensate for the relatively low increase in the levels of the
SoGA20ox1 and SoGA3ox1 transcripts in young
leaves to maintain the active GAs. The time course experiment
demonstrates the different regulation by the photoperiod of the three
GA dioxygenases: (a) expression of SoGA20ox1 changed quickly
and strongly in petioles and tips, (b) the SoGA3ox1
transcript level was only slightly changed in petioles, and (c) the
SoGA2ox1 transcript level increased in petioles but
decreased in young leaves and tips.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Time course of SoGA20ox1,
SoGA3ox1, and SoGA2ox1 expression after spinach
plants were transferred from SD to LD conditions. GA20ox1
transcripts increased with increasing duration of LD treatment in
petioles (A), young leaves (B), and tips (C). GA3ox1
transcripts increased with increasing duration of LD treatment in
petioles (A), but they did not change in young leaves (B), and tips (C)
after exposure to increasing numbers of LD. GA2ox1
transcripts increased with increasing duration of LD treatment in
petioles (A), but they decreased in young leaves (B), and tips (C). The
numbers under the blots indicate the relative amount of transcript
after standardization using SoActin as a loading control.
The value of each transcript level in petioles in SD was arbitrarily
set at 1.0.
|
|
Effect of Light and Darkness on Gene Expression
To investigate the effect of light and darkness on gene
expression, spinach plants grown in SD and LD conditions were harvested at the end of the 8-h high-intensity light period (0 h), at the end of
16 h of darkness (16 D), or at the end of 16 h of
low-intensity light (16 L). The levels of the SoGA20ox1,
SoGA3ox1, and SoGA2ox1 transcripts were
determined in petioles, young leaves, and tips (Fig.
6). Compared with the levels in each
group at the end of the 8-h high-intensity light period (0 h),
additional light (16 L) greatly increased the levels of the
SoGA20ox1 transcripts in petioles of plants that were
initially in SD conditions (13× compared with SD at 0 h) and also
in petioles in LD conditions (4× compared with LD at 0 h; Fig.
6A). The levels of the SoGA20ox1 transcripts in tips were
not changed by additional light (Fig. 6C). A long dark treatment (16 D)
did not affect the levels of the SoGA20ox1 transcripts in
petioles, young leaves, and tips in either SD or LD conditions. This
means that the levels of SoGA20ox1 transcript are regulated
much more by light than by darkness. Exposure to weak light or dark
treatment had little effect on the levels of the SoGA3ox1
and SoGA2ox1 transcripts (Fig. 6).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Effects of light and darkness on the transcript
level of SoGA20ox1, SoGA3ox1, and
SoGA2ox1 in petioles (A), young leaves (B), and tips (C).
Spinach plants were harvested at the end of the 8-h high-intensity
light period (0 h) and after transfer from SD or LD conditions to
16 h of darkness (16 D) or to 16 h of weak incandescent light
(16 L). The numbers under the blots indicate the relative amount of
each transcript after standardization using SoActin as a
loading control. The value of each transcript level in petioles at
0 h in SD was arbitrarily set at 1.0.
|
|
Expression in Other Organs
To determine other organ-specific expression patterns of the GA
dioxygenases, male and female flowers, stems, and shoot tips were
harvested from spinach plants that had been exposed to LD conditions
for more than 3 weeks (Fig. 7). The shoot
tips included the upper 1 cm; stems were the next 1 cm of the elongated
stem. The SoGA20ox1 mRNA was more abundant in stems than in
shoot tips, and little transcript was detected in flowers. By contrast,
SoGA3ox1 and SoGA2ox1 were highly expressed in
male and female flowers, stems, and shoot tips.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Expression of SoGA20ox1,
SoGA3ox1, and SoGA2ox1 in male flowers ( ),
female flowers ( ), stems (St), and shoot tips (ShT). Spinach plants
were harvested after more than 3 weeks in LD conditions. In this case,
the shoot tips included the upper 1 cm of the shoots; stems were the
next 1 cm of the elongated stems. The numbers under the blots indicate
the relative amount of each transcript after standardization using
SoActin as a loading control. The value of the transcript
level of each gene in male flowers was arbitrarily set at 1.0.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We isolated a full-length cDNA clone encoding GA 3-oxidase and two
full-length cDNA clones encoding GA 2-oxidase from spinach. Heterologous expression in E. coli showed that
the product of the SoGA3ox1 gene is able to catalyze
3 -hydroxylation of GA20 to
GA1, whereas the products of the
SoGA2ox genes catalyze 2 -hydroxylation of
GA20 and GA1, both
C19-GAs with a -lactone in the A ring of the
GA structure (Fig. 1). In addition, recombinant SoGA2ox1 converts GA53 to GA97, both
C20-GAs (Fig. 1). The recombinant proteins of GA
2-oxidases from other species specifically 2 -hydroxylate C19-GAs (Thomas et al., 1999 ;
Elliott et al., 2001 ). So far, few exceptions have been
reported to this rule: GA15, a
C20-GA, was 2 -hydroxylated by PcGA2ox1 and
AtGA2ox2 (Thomas et al., 1999 ); and
GA44, also a C20-GA (Fig.
1), was 2 -hydroxylated to GA98 by OsGA2ox1
(Sakamoto et al., 2001 ). Both of these GAs have a -lactone in the A ring. When this lactone ring was opened,
GA15 was no longer metabolized by recombinant
PcGA2ox1, but it was (although less efficiently) by AtGA2ox2
(Thomas et al., 1999 ). Spinach produces large amounts of
2 -hydroxy-GA53 (=GA97),
and smaller amounts of GA98 (=
2 -hydroxy-GA44), GA99 (=
2 -hydroxy-GA19; Mander et al.,
1996 ), and GA110 (=
2 -hydroxy-GA12; Owen et al., 1998 ). Substrate specificity of the 2-oxidases for the possible precursors of these 2 -hydroxy-C20-GAs remains
to be determined.
Expression of SoGA3ox1 was very little affected by the
photoperiod (Figs. 4 and 5), so that it is possible that the
conversion of GA20 to
GA1 in LD is limited by the amount of
GA20 substrate available and not by the
enzyme level. Although expression of SoGA2ox1 was
down-regulated by LD, this may be only a minor factor in the
maintenance of a high GA1 level, because
SoGA2ox1 transcripts are much less abundant than those of
SoGA2ox2, and expression of the latter is not under
photoperiodic control (Fig. 4). In a different system, de-etiolation of
pea seedlings, GA 3-oxidase was down-regulated by light, whereas GA
2-oxidase was up-regulated. This resulted in decreased
GA1, increased GA8 levels,
and a reduction in growth rate (Reid et al.,
2002 ).
The increase in growth rate of petioles of spinach in LD occurs during
the first 16 h of weak supplementary light (Zeevaart, 1971 ). This may be mainly because of the increase in
SoGA20ox1 transcripts during the additional 16 h of
light rather than the small increase in SoGA3ox1 and
decrease in SoGA2ox1 transcripts (Fig. 6A). The results in
Figure 6 show that moving spinach plants from LD to 16 h darkness
did not reduce the transcript level of any of the GA dioxygenases
studied. On the other hand, Gilmour et al. (1986)
reported that enzyme activities for the conversions GA53 to GA44 and
GA19 to GA20, both
representing GA 20-oxidase activity, declined quickly in plants in
darkness. It is possible, therefore, that regulation of GA 20-oxidase
by photoperiod is not only at the transcriptional level, but that there
may be posttranscriptional control as well. Thus, transcript levels may
not necessarily be indicative of enzyme activity. Further work on
photoperiodic control of GA biosynthesis in spinach should therefore
attempt to compare the protein level and enzymatic activity of GA
20-oxidase.
The low expression of the SoGA20ox1 gene in spinach flowers
(Fig. 7) may mean that it has no role in flower development, unlike the
LeGA20ox1 and LeGA20ox2 genes, which are highly
expressed in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) during flower
bud and early fruit development (Rebers et al., 1999 ).
Thus, another GA 20-oxidase gene may be involved in flower development
in spinach.
Up-regulation of GA biosynthesis by LD starts at the beginning of the
pathway with increased ent-kaurene biosynthesis
(Zeevaart and Gage, 1993 ), and in the later stages, it
is mainly attributable to the much increased expression of
SoGA20ox1. It is surprising that expression of
SoGA3ox1, encoding the product that catalyzes the pivotal
step of 3 -hydroxylation, shows little fluctuation in response to the
photoperiod (Fig. 4). Although expression of SoGA2ox1 is
down-regulated in tips and young leaves of plants in LD, the overall
effect of LD on GA metabolism is that more GA29
(Metzger and Zeevaart, 1980 , 1982 )
and GA8 (Wu et al., 1996 ) are
produced in plants in LD than in SD. Thus, it appears that in SD, the
steps catalyzed by GA 20-oxidase are enzyme limited, whereas GA
3-oxidase and GA 2-oxidase are limited by the amount of substrate
available. In LD, a new balance is established between GA1 synthesis and deactivation, increasing the
GA1 level to such an extent that the threshold
value required for stem elongation is exceeded (Zeevaart et al.,
1993 ).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material and Growing Conditions
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv Savoy Hybrid
612) plants were grown in a SD growth chamber for approximately 6 or 7 weeks as described previously (Zeevaart and Gage, 1993 ).
SD conditions consisted of 8 h of light from fluorescent tubes and
incandescent bulbs of approximately 300 µmol m 2
s 1 at 23°C, followed by 16 h darkness at 20°C.
For LD conditions, the 8-h main light period was followed by 16 h
of weak light from incandescent bulbs of 10 µmol m 2
s 1 at 20°C.
RT-PCR
RT-PCR was used for the cloning of GA 3-oxidase and GA
2-oxidases. First-strand cDNA from total RNA was synthesized by
SuperScript II RNase H-minus Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA), using oligo(dT) primers at 42°C for 1 h. The cDNA
product was then used in PCR reactions containing Taq
polymerase and several pairs of degenerate primers (Table I). For GA
3-oxidase, degenerate primers were synthesized based on conserved
regions of GA 3-oxidases from Arabidopsis (Chiang et al.,
1995 ; Yamaguchi et al., 1998 ) and pea
(Lester et al., 1997 ). For GA 2-oxidase, the degenerate primers were synthesized based on conserved regions of GA 2-oxidases from runner bean and Arabidopsis (Thomas et al., 1999 ).
These primers were used in all combinations in PCR reactions with
first-strand cDNA as a template. The PCR amplifications were performed
with a DNA Thermal Cycler (RTC-200, MJ Research, Waltham, MA) in a 50-µL reaction containing 1× PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTP, 2.5 pmol
of each primer, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The reaction mixtures were heated to 94°C for 3 min and
then subjected to 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 48°C for 1 min, and
72°C for 45 s. A final extension was performed at 72°C for 10 min. A 5-µL volume of the PCR reaction products was analyzed by
1.2% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis, purified with a Wizard PCR purification system (Promega, Madison, WI), and then cloned into
the pGEM Teasy vector (Promega). Analysis of the DNA sequences was
carried out using the DNASTAR program (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI).
Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the Clustal W 1.8 Multiple Sequence Alignment program and printed using BOXSHADE 3.21 (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/Box_form.html).
RACE and Cloning
5'- and 3'-RACE of spinach GA 3-oxidase cDNA and GA 2-oxidase
cDNA were performed using the SMART RACE cDNA Amplification Kit from BD
Biosciences Clontech. Poly(A+) RNA was isolated from
spinach using the PolyATtract mRNA Isolation System IV (Promega)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. After RT with primers
supplied by BD Biosciences Clontech, the first-strand cDNA was used
directly in 5'- and 3'-RACE PCR reactions. Primary PCR amplification
reactions were achieved using a high-fidelity enzyme
(Pfu Turbo polymerase; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and
gene-specific primers JZ282 and JZ298 for GA 2-oxidase1, JZ375 and
JZ574 for GA 2-oxidase2, and JZ445 and JZ444 for GA 3-oxidase1 to
generate the 5'- and 3'-cDNA fragments, respectively. The PCR reaction consisted of the first denaturation for 3 min at 94°C, a series of 30 cycles (1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 54°C or 55°C, and 1 min at
72°C) with a final extension for 5 min at 72°C using a thermal cycler (RTC-200, MJ Research). A 5-µL aliquot of the RT-PCR and RACE
reaction solution was analyzed by 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were purified and cloned into the pCR-Script Cam SK(+) cloning vector from Stratagene. These constructs were sequenced.
Northern-Blot Analysis
Leaf blades, petioles, young leaves, tips (Zeevaart and
Gage, 1993 ), and other organs were harvested, frozen
immediately in liquid N2, and stored at 80°C. Northern
blots were prepared by electrophoresis of 30 µg of total RNA in the
presence of formaldehyde (Sambrook et al., 1989 ), and
RNA was transferred to nitrocellulose. Full-length cDNAs were labeled
with [32P]dCTP by the Random Primers DNA Labeling System
(Invitrogen) and the radioactive probes were used to probe northern
blots. Hybridization was carried out at 42°C using a 50% (v/v)
formamide system (Sambrook et al., 1989 ).
Membranes were washed twice for 10 min in 2× SSC at room temperature
and then twice for 10 min in 0.2× SSC with 0.1% (w/v) SDS at
65°C (high stringency). At low stringency, the membrane was washed
once for 10 min in 2× SSC at room temperature and then washed again
for 10 min in 2× SSC at 65°C.
The relative amounts of mRNA were determined with a PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Each blot was first probed with
one of the various cDNAs, and then stripped and reprobed with
SoActin. The ratio of the GA dioxygenase mRNA to
Actin mRNA was used to compare the mRNA levels in various
organs and treatments. Each experiment was repeated at least three
times with similar results.
Quantitative RT-PCR
The first-strand cDNA synthesis reactions were carried out using
5 µg of each total RNA sample, random hexamer primer, and avian RNase
H-minus reverse Transcriptase. A pair of primers (JZ385 and JZ386) was
used to amplify a 401-bp fragment of GA 2-oxidase1. JZ389 and JZ390
primers (Table I) were used to amplify a 324-bp fragment of the
SoActin gene as a control. Both of these fragments can
be distinguished from any contaminant of genomic DNA by size. The
RT-PCR products were cloned and sequenced to verify the sequences of
the fragments of the SoGA2ox1 and SoActin
genes. The cDNA solutions (2.5 µL) were used as a template in a
standard 50-µL PCR reaction. Expression of SoGA2ox1
and SoActin was compared at 29 cycles where both PCR
reactions were progressing exponentially. Ten microliters of PCR
reaction products was separated by electrophoresis, blotted, and hybridized.
Expression of Recombinant GA 3-Oxidase and GA 2-Oxidase
Proteins
Coding regions of 2-oxidases were produced by PCR with the
following primer set designed from the RACE product: JZ300 and JZ301
for mature GA 2-oxidase1 (PspAI and XhoI
sites inserted to facilitate cloning) and JZ582 and JZ619
(BamHI and XhoI sites inserted to
facilitate cloning) for mature GA 2-oxidase2. For GA 3-oxidase, JZ509
and JZ510 (PspAI and SalI sites inserted
to facilitate cloning) were used to get the coding region. The
resulting PCR fragments were cloned into a pCR-Script Cam SK(+) cloning vector and then digested with PspA1/XhoI,
BamHI/XhoI, or
PspA1/SalI, respectively, and subcloned
into the corresponding restriction sites of the pGEX-5X-2 vector
(Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). These full-length cDNA clones
(pGEXGA3ox1, pGEXGA2ox1, or pGEXGA2ox2) were transformed into
Escherichia coli, strain BL21pLysS. Fifty milliliters of
freshly cultured cells was added to 1 L of Luria-Bertani medium with
100 mg L 1 ampicillin and incubated at 37°C with
vigorous shaking. When the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.6, isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to give a
final concentration of 3 mM, and the culture was incubated
for another 2 h. The cells were harvested and suspended in lysis
buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 10 mg
mL 1 lysozyme), and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Crude cell extracts were obtained by using a Sonifier Cell
Disruptor 200 (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT) carried out for 10 cycles (10 × 10 s) on ice. The lysates were submerged in
liquid N2 for 2 min and then thawed in an ice bath for 15 min (Johnson and Hecht, 1994 ). The lysates were
centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 min, and the supernatant was stored at
80°C until used for enzyme assays.
Enzyme Assays and Product Identification
The assays for GA 3-oxidase activity and GA 2-oxidase activities
were performed with approximately 30,000 dpm of 14C-labeled
GAs. [2H2]GAs were used only for product
identification. The reaction mixture (100 µL) contained 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.5), 0.5 mM FeSO4, 5 mM 2-oxoglutarate, 5 mM
ascorbate, and 80 µL of bacterial extract. Cofactors were added again
after 1 h. The mixture was incubated at 30°C for up to 6 h
with gentle shaking. For identification of products, the assays were
scaled up to 500 µL. The products were isolated by reverse phase HPLC
with an on-line FLO-ONE detector (Radioanalytic, Tampa, FL;
Zeevaart and Gage, 1993 ). For identification of the
products by gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry (Zeevaart et al., 1993 ), the GC was equipped with a DB-5MS capillary
column (30-m × 0.32-mm × 0.25-µm film, J&W Scientific,
Folsom, CA), which was operated in splitless mode. The oven temperature
was kept at 100°C for 1 min after sample injection and then
programmed from 100°C to 230°C at 40°C min 1, from
230 to 280°C at 8°C min 1, and finally to 300°C at
20°C min 1. Specific activities of substrates and
products were determined by GC-selected ion monitoring of the
molecular ion clusters (Zeevaart and Gage,
1993 ).
Distribution of Materials
Upon written request, all novel materials described in this
publication will be made available in limited quantities and in a
timely manner for noncommercial research purposes, subject to the
requisite permission from any third-party owners of all or parts of the
material. Obtaining any permissions will be the responsibility of the requestor.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Bev Chamberlin (Michigan State University Mass
Spectrometry Facility) for her assistance with GC-mass spectrometry. We
are grateful to Dr. Xiangqian Ma (Michigan State University) for
her helpful comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received May 31, 2002; returned for revision July 11, 2002; accepted September 7, 2002.
1
This work was supported by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (grant no. 97-35304-4692) and by the U.S. Department
of Energy (grant no. DE-FG02-91ER20021).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail zeevaart{at}msu.edu; fax
517-353-9168.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.008581.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Chiang H-H, Hwang I, Goodman HM
(1995)
Isolation of the Arabidopsis GA4 locus.
Plant Cell
7: 195-201[Abstract]
-
Cowling RJ, Kamiya Y, Seto H, Harberd NP
(1998)
Gibberellin dose-response regulation of GA4 gene transcript levels in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol
117: 1195-1203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Elliott RC, Ross JJ, Smith JJ, Lester DR, Reid JB
(2001)
Feed-forward regulation of gibberellin deactivation in pea.
J Plant Growth Regul
20: 87-94[CrossRef][Web of Science]
-
Gilmour SJ, Zeevaart JAD, Schwenen L, Graebe JE
(1986)
Gibberellin metabolism in cell-free extracts from spinach leaves in relation to photoperiod.
Plant Physiol
82: 190-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hedden P, Phillips AL
(2000)
Gibberellin metabolism: new insights revealed by the genes.
Trends Plant Sci
5: 523-530[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Itoh H, Tanaka-Ueguchi M, Kawaide H, Chen X, Kamiya Y, Matsuoka M
(1999)
The gene encoding tobacco gibberellin 3-oxidase is expressed at the site of GA action during stem elongation and flower organ development.
Plant J
20: 15-24[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Itoh H, Tanaka-Ueguchi M, Sentoku N, Kitano H, Matsuoka M, Kobayashi M
(2001)
Cloning and functional analysis of two gibberellin 3
-oxidase genes that are differently expressed during the growth of rice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
98: 8909-8914[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Johnson BH, Hecht MH
(1994)
Recombinant proteins can be isolated from Escherichia coli cells by repeated cycles of freezing and thawing.
BioTechnology
12: 1357-1360[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lester DR, Ross JJ, Davies PJ, Reid JB
(1997)
Mendel's stem length gene (Le) encodes a gibberellin 3-oxidase.
Plant Cell
9: 1435-1443[Abstract]
-
Lester DR, Ross JJ, Smith JJ, Elliott RC, Reid JB
(1999)
Gibberellin 2-oxidation and the SLN gene of Pisum sativum.
Plant J
19: 65-73[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Mander LN, Owen DJ, Croker SJ, Gaskin P, Hedden P, Lewis MJ, Talon M, Gage DA, Zeevaart JAD, Brenner ML, et al
(1996)
Identification of three C20-gibberellins: GA97 (2
-hydroxy-GA53), GA98 (2 -hydroxy-GA44) and GA99 (2 -hydroxy-GA19).
Phytochemistry
43: 23-28[Medline] -
Metzger JD, Zeevaart JAD
(1980)
Effect of photoperiod on the levels of endogenous gibberellins in spinach as measured by combined gas chromatography-selected ion current monitoring.
Plant Physiol
66: 844-846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Metzger JD, Zeevaart JAD
(1982)
Photoperiodic control of gibberellin metabolism in spinach.
Plant Physiol
69: 287-291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Owen DJ, Mander LN, Storey JMD, Huntley RP, Gaskin P, Lenton JR, Gage DA, Zeevaart JAD
(1998)
Synthesis and confirmation of structure for a new gibberellin, 2
-hydroxy-GA12 (GA110), from spinach and oil palm.
Phytochemistry
47: 331-337[Medline] -
Rebers M, Kaneta T, Kawaide H, Yamaguchi S, Yang Y-Y, Imai R, Sekimoto H, Kamiya Y
(1999)
Regulation of gibberellin biosynthesis genes during flower and early fruit development of tomato.
Plant J
17: 241-250[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
-
Reid JB, Botwright NA, Smith JJ, O'Neill DP, Kerckhoffs LHJ
(2002)
Control of gibberellin levels and gene expression during de-etiolation in pea.
Plant Physiol
128: 734-741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sakamoto T, Kobayashi M, Itoh H, Tagiri A, Kayano T, Tanaka H, Iwahori S, Matsuoka M
(2001)
Expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene around the shoot apex is related to phase transition in rice.
Plant Physiol
125: 1508-1516[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook J, Fritch EF, Maniatis T
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Talon M, Zeevaart JAD
(1990)
Gibberellins and stem growth as related to photoperiod in Silene armeria L.
Plant Physiol
92: 1094-1100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Talon M, Zeevaart JAD, Gage DA
(1991)
Identification of gibberellins in spinach and effects of light and darkness on their levels.
Plant Physiol
97: 1521-1526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thomas SG, Philips AL, Hedden P
(1999)
Molecular cloning and functional expression of gibberellin 2-oxidases, multifunctional enzymes involved in gibberellin deactivation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96: 4698-4703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wu K, Gage DA, Zeevaart JAD
(1996)
Molecular cloning and photoperiod-regulated expression of gibberellin 20-oxidase from the long-day plant spinach.
Plant Physiol
110: 547-554[Abstract]
-
Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y
(2000)
Gibberellin biosynthesis: its regulation by endogenous and environmental signals.
Plant Cell Physiol
41: 251-257
-
Yamaguchi S, Smith MW, Brown RGS, Kamiya Y, Sun T
(1998)
Phytochrome regulation and differential expression of gibberellin 3
-hydroxylase genes in germinating Arabidopsis seeds.
Plant Cell
10: 2115-2126[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Zeevaart JAD
(1971)
Effects of photoperiod on growth rate and endogenous gibberellins in the long-day rosette plant spinach.
Plant Physiol
47: 821-827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zeevaart JAD, Gage DA
(1993)
ent-Kaurene biosynthesis is enhanced by long photoperiods in the long-day plants Spinacia oleracea L. and Agrostemma githago L.
Plant Physiol
101: 25-29[Abstract]
-
Zeevaart JAD, Gage DA, Talon M
(1993)
Gibberellin A1 is required for stem elongation in spinach.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90: 7401-7405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
© 2002 American Society of Plant Biologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-F. Lo, S.-Y. Yang, K.-T. Chen, Y.-I. Hsing, J. A.D. Zeevaart, L.-J. Chen, and S.-M. Yu
A Novel Class of Gibberellin 2-Oxidases Control Semidwarfism, Tillering, and Root Development in Rice
PLANT CELL,
October 1, 2008;
20(10):
2603 - 2618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. King, L. N. Mander, T. Asp, C. P. MacMillan, C. A. Blundell, and L. T. Evans
Selective Deactivation of Gibberellins below the Shoot Apex is Critical to Flowering but Not to Stem Elongation of Lolium
Mol Plant,
March 1, 2008;
1(2):
295 - 307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Serrani, R. Sanjuan, O. Ruiz-Rivero, M. Fos, and J. L. Garcia-Martinez
Gibberellin Regulation of Fruit Set and Growth in Tomato
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2007;
145(1):
246 - 257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. King, T. Moritz, L. T. Evans, J. Martin, C. H. Andersen, C. Blundell, I. Kardailsky, and P. M. Chandler
Regulation of Flowering in the Long-Day Grass Lolium temulentum by Gibberellins and the FLOWERING LOCUS T Gene
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2006;
141(2):
498 - 507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bancos, A.-M. Szatmari, J. Castle, L. Kozma-Bognar, K. Shibata, T. Yokota, G. J. Bishop, F. Nagy, and M. Szekeres
Diurnal Regulation of the Brassinosteroid-Biosynthetic CPD Gene in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2006;
141(1):
299 - 309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. MacMillan, C. A. Blundell, and R. W. King
Flowering of the Grass Lolium perenne. Effects of Vernalization and Long Days on Gibberellin Biosynthesis and Signaling
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2005;
138(3):
1794 - 1806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hisamatsu, R. W. King, C. A. Helliwell, and M. Koshioka
The Involvement of Gibberellin 20-Oxidase Genes in Phytochrome-Regulated Petiole Elongation of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2005;
138(2):
1106 - 1116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Lee and J. A.D. Zeevaart
Molecular Cloning of GA 2-Oxidase3 from Spinach and Its Ectopic Expression in Nicotiana sylvestris
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2005;
138(1):
243 - 254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|